With a spectacular presentation that included parachutists, cyclists, climbers and others, the co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin, appeared in the stage of Google I/O 2012 to present more innovations on Google Glass, the glasses of developing reality made by the company and that until now are in prototype stage.

During the presentation it was explained that Google Glass includes a screen that goes posicionada on the eye instead of opposite to him, with the intention of which I did not hinder us on having wanted to look at our surroundings. Also it has a camerawoman who will allow us to capture photos and videos, microphone to capture voice, and a tactile surface in a side for the control panel.

Neither details of the processor nor memory happened, although it was said that also it includes a series of sensors like gyroscope, GPS and others.

The project of these glasses has a gestation surrounds at the age of 2, and the prototype has been changing in the time to become smaller and more light. As it was said in the presentation, they weigh even less than some glasses of the sun, and allow to go in for sport or the activity that let’s want.

Other of the points that those of Mountain View want to tackle with Glass, is that the persons could gain access to information quickly. So that it will not be already necessary to ask on anything anybody, since now you will have all this information within reach of your hand, I mean, seen.

Brin announced also the “Explorer Edition” of the glasses, which will be available for USD$1.500 for the developers who were present at the event, from 2013. The glasses will keep on being a prototype, and the co-founder warned that they will not be so polished like the version that hopes to sell for the final users. The product is only for the really interested ones that they want the last technology, he said.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OUP_Z3iZPs

Microsoft posteó in its blog, seemingly for error, that the next version of test of Windows 8, called Preview Be Reread, will be available for discharge from now on on May 31.

The announcement was eliminated, but as in Internet the people are very rapid, the copies of the message of Chuck Chan, vice-president of the team of development of Windows, they multiplied for Internet. According to Chan, Preview Relea Relea he was “put at disposal today”, signing below with the date of today and the name – “Chuck Chan, May 31st”.

The message was eliminated a few moments after it was published, but the most probable thing is that we see appearing again during today.

Previously Microsoft had promised That Preview Be Reread for the first week of June, something that they would be taking very literally, would thinking that tomorrow on Friday it is newly a June 1.

There are no official announcements yet on when the final version of the operating system will be available, but one hopes that it should make debut in October. In contrast to others “be reread candidate” previous, Preview Be Reread it is not finished, and he lacks some characteristics that will enter the final version.

It does a pair of weeks, for example, Microsoft he affirmed that it will not keep on using the interface Aero in the office of Windows 8, but this change will not be visible up to the final version.

Link: Microsoft accidentally announces Windows 8 Release Preview availability for May 31 (Neowin)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngul5sHLzUE&feature=player_embedded#!

In the course of the morning Facebook had lost little more than 12 % of the value of its shares but it was of hoping that they should recover a little.

Since they can realize, this recovery was very small, managing to limit the loss margin to 10.99 %. On Friday every action was quoting in the USD $ 38.23 and today it closed in the USD$34.03.

In spite of this it went to Nasdaq very well and had an upturn of 2.46 %

In the full XXIst century, the use of the new technologies presents itself as a fundamental aspect in the development of the professional assignments in its respective ambiences or sectors in the present post will be included how the lawyer faces the advance of the new technologies.

1. CHANGES: The produced economic changes are immense, a topcoat for the machinery that the proper lawyers and the assistants of these use in its offices and offices to carry out a simpler and rapid work; therefore in spite of being a task simplificadora and although it represents the same feature or monotony character, all this drives to that the professional sees its juridical attenuated occupation. The texts processors for the writing of diverse documents were completely unthinkable instruments 25 ó 30 years earlier, in that the typewriter and the continuous errors, on the part of the clerk, were to the agenda, but with the current means, the above mentioned mistakes scarcely take place. A work takes place in any case with less possibility of commission of errors and a major guarantee of a quite realized work.

2. – YOU CAUSE: The emergence of the new technologies is something obviously unavoidable, we can be in favor or contemplate it as if it was a question of our worst enemy, but of yes being all insurances, it is that the person in general and the professional in particular, they must go of parallel form with the advance of the times. It is a question of a predominantly social question, more than juridical: social networks in which the people interact and they raise its problems, specific juridical social networks (like www.pleiteando.com), Forums where the proper lawyers interact to cooperate and to collaborate between them in the doubts solution, clients who already leave aside the old telephone directories in role and increasingly they use the web pages to look the professional who more is convenient for them what it saves time and money they are between many new situations between which far from demonizarlas we should always use them of course with the caution of not knowing with whom we speak to another side of the network.

3. – AFTEREFFECTS: It is the consequences that the lawyer in principle, is in an area, completely unknown; it is something clear, because he knows that it has to realize a series of changes, which not only are transcendental for their own development, but he contemplates the difficulty of its prompt implantation in the least possible time.

4. – TARGETS: I think in this case that the general target is the entire attainment of the plans that the governments establish for the impulse of the Information society and of the Knowledge. The activity of the right in some way can be foreign to it and a big interest appears also on the part of the professional schools for a major approach between technology and right, claiming in turn the corresponding comparison between small, medium-sized and big offices, like also the professionals’ alliances; they all must enjoy the new technologies, which it is not an exclusive matter for the most wealthy, between other things, not like prize that is awarded, but like essential element for the llevanza to end of its labor obligations.
In the present decade and in the future ones, the lawyer will be facing the new technologies major safety. We understand that its use, it can transport perhaps his major benefits that damages (it is for what one waits, as it always happens in a revolution), but everything depends on the employment that of the same ones they give themselves. The new technologies are neither good nor bad, it is the configuration that establishes of them what turns facing the society the fact, like positive or negative.
But this safety of that I refer is under my perspective, the point of inflection at least in a part of the politics of work in the juridical offices, due to two distinguishable questions seemingly:
A. – the work of adequacy of subsequent questions to the inertia of the computer science.

B. – the task of computerization of records, reports and other papers. All the juridical problems that raise this new hardware a few proper requirements of its profession join, from the point of view of the lawyer, as they are those who derive from the duty of professional secret and from the subjection to the norms deontológicas. It becomes necessary, therefore, of a side, a safety environment that offers the same guarantees as the traditional performance of the legal profession and that assures that he is a lawyer who says it to be; and of other, a suitable regulation that guarantees the fulfillment of the requirements deontológicas.

Other one of the questions that can be thought is in marketing terms. Often, the criteria to select lawyers it is based on perceptions or intuitions of the persons more that in the theoretical knowledge and of the juridical praxis in the strict sense, with what the staging is truly excellent because the client or potential consumer can go so far as to establish the relation technology – quality, to major technology, therefore major quality, because it is of supposing that of previous form there has been a strong economic investment in furniture and technical instruments and consistently this alone those might do them with a certain status, but I believe that this is changing, that it is necessary to be optimists and therefore if intention exists as I mentioned before being equal in technological means both to individual offices and to big consultancies, the previous comment loses meaning of life in every respect.

It is a reality that the constant technological advances of the society provoke in the lawyers, be already like citizens, be already like collaborators of the service of Administration of justice, a need for real and concrete insertion to the fascinating world of the new technologies, which suppose a series of advantages for the profession and the obligation of search of the Justice and the equity.

Nevertheless, and opposite to this position, there rise voices that consider the new technologies to be an unnecessary and addictive instrument and accuse to the applications constructed for the use of the freeways of the information like something not necessary essentially for the exercise of our profession.

The world evolves at such a speed that we run the risk of remaining in the past from the same moment in which we begin walking. It is not enough to know that the technology is necessary, it is necessary to internalize this idea and to make her ours, not to remain to the margin of this continuous revolution that develops around us.

THE FEAR AS TOOL OF THE PROGRESS

There exists an insuperable reality that comes from the limits of the history, which implies that the human being stretches to become strong in the situations and before the circumstances that turn out to be comfortable to him. All this is trasladable to any of the ambiences of our life, in general, and to the professional ambience, in particular. On the other hand, the man before the novel thing, reacts with certain prevention, and inclusive I push back, especially if it is something that it does not comprise.

For many lawyers the new technologies mean something unknown, own of other branches of the knowledge. They know that they serve, but they do not understand how they work, and to penetrate into them seem terribly complicated to them. In such a way that in the end they come to the conclusion that what is not easy to explain is not attractive and to the attractive little they must approach the least possible thing.

To imagine the utilities of the new technologies means to accept the effort and the sacrifice that supposes dedicating time to learn its handling and the possibilities that they offer and to accept that from the moment in which they are learned to use everything it is going to change, and is that what it retracts. They are afraid that the professional situation of the one through that they have lived, knowing what it is necessary to do in every moment, with a definite model, is going to disappear, and the fear of what could come creates confusion and fear of the new thing.

We are calm knowing which are the hardware that we use, which are the courts that we cover, which are the books to which we resort. We are afraid about not knowing, and this fear is worse than the own ignorance, because it paralyzes and prevents from progressing, forgetting and denying that the new technologies do not mean another thing than evolution and progress, and this one always ends up by going in our benefit.

The question is to acquire conscience of it.

The computers and the mobiles play an increasing roll in helping the doctors to monitoring to its patients

 The computer technology advances, and with her the possibilities multiply. Now, in many hospitals and clinics in the USA the technology is used for monitorear closely, and in real-time, to the patients. A team, for example, monitorea the blood pressure and other important parameters, like the cardiac rhythm or the level of sugar in the blood, and he sends it to a servant. Also, a computer located in the house of the patient, can read him the information and warn him when some parameter is not inside the status of wished values, or the notice can be sent by cell phone to the patient, at the same time that to its doctor. The doctors at first were skeptical on this matter, but now when it is proved that the system works and serves, the same one is used in patients of the old age. Nevertheless, they clarify, the system does not end with the visits to the hospital or to the doctor, but the same ones are less frequent, but the contact and monitoring, constant. Although the system aims at aged users or of the old age, its developers of the Oxford University are not afraid that it finds it hard to them to adapt itself to the mobiles, to be able to read in them the information of its checkups. It is supposed that, motivated by the calmness of feeling elegant, they will not have disadvantages in learning quickly the handling of the mobiles of last generation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRZ2Sh5-XuM

Bonus wat video!

WASHINGTON – republican Legislators promoted on Wednesday a project of law that would arrange to the Office of Immigration and Customs (I HOISTED for its initials in English) to stop to those who put themselves after the frill under the effects of the alcohol and reside in the United States without authorization, a measurement that the democrats denounced like a national version of the migratory laws approved in Arizona dui and Alabama dui.

During a hearing celebrated by the subcommittee of immigration of the Lower House, the republican legislator Lamar Smith, president of the judicial committee, said that it supports the law project because the current law does not need from ICE to stop immigrants without the due papers who have incurred related absences to be handled under the effects of the alcohol.

Smith indicated that the Supreme Court failed in 2004 that a penal judgment for handling intoxicated when there is no bad intention does not constitute a violent crime for migratory effects.

“The illegal immigrants who drive intoxicated must be stopped until they have been deported so that they could not turn into threat for any more Americans”, said Smith after pointing out that an American dies every 48 minutes in road accidents related to the consumption of alcohol.

The measurement, presented in January by the republican Sue Myrick, stipulates that the state and municipal police officers consult databases updated by the federal government to determine the migratory condition of the drunk drivers that they stop. Also, it brings funds to the local authorities to transport these arrested up to ICE offices.

Zoe Logfren, main democrat in the subcommittee, denounced to the law project as violatorio of the Tenth Amendment of the American Constitution, since “the states are sovereign in our system of federalist government. The federal government simply cannot ‘order’ the state officials to look over the fulfillment of federal laws”.

Also, the legislator of California pointed out that the measurement would give place to discrimination and racial categorization on having demanded from the police officers that they should consult the databases when they suspect that the persons aprehendidas are immigrant not authorized to remain in the country.

“, On having ordered the state police officers to treat the persons differently if they seem foreign, the law project essentially would turn into a national version of the migratory laws of Arizona dui and Alabama dui, inviting the spread of racial discrimination and of discrimination, violating the Constitution”, said Logfren.

The law project must be submitted to voting in the plenary meeting of the committee, controlled by the republicans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9c6W4CCU9M4

Google obtained the patent for the design of its glasses of developing reality Glass, which had been deposited to the responsible state office last October 26.

Google obtains this way the rights on the frame and the construction of the device – not on the screens or the specific components that are used. The patent is quite scarce in details, so we have to remain with the general idea that Google already presented to us one month ago.
Google Glass is a project carried out by the laboratory Google X, which tries to bring the reality increased to our everyday life across these screens opposite to the eyes, which would warn us when they come to us called, we have an e-mail, how it is the time out and other things.