<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
    <channel>
      <title>Herbalife Nutrition Institute RSS 2.0 Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.herbalifenutritioninstitute.com/en/current-opinion/</link>
      <description>Current Opinion</description>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:33:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/HerbalifeNutritionInstituteRss20Feed" /><feedburner:info uri="herbalifenutritioninstituterss20feed" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
          <title>Two Weeks of a Healthy Lifestyle Program Influences Cognition and Brain Function</title>
          <link>http://www.herbalifenutritioninstitute.com/en/current-opinion/</link>
          <guid>http://www.herbalifenutritioninstitute.com/en/current-opinion/</guid>
          <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:33:54 GMT</pubDate>
          <description>The risk for cognitive decline increases with age. Approximately 40 percent of people 65 years and older have age-associated memory impairment characterized by self-perception of memory loss and a standardized memory test score demonstrating lower objective memory performance compared with young adults. Such mild age-related memory changes are relatively stable over time. By contrast, patients with mild cognitive impairment, characterized by greater cognitive decline without impairment of activities of daily living, are at risk for progressing to Alzheimer’s disease at a rate of about 15 percent per year.</description>
        </item>
		<item>
          <title>The Cost of U.S. Foods as  Related to their Nutritive Value</title>
          <link>http://www.herbalifenutritioninstitute.com/en/current-opinion/Food_Costs.aspx</link>
          <guid>http://www.herbalifenutritioninstitute.com/en/current-opinion/Food_Costs.aspx</guid>
          <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:33:54 GMT</pubDate>
          <description>In comparing the cost of different  foods, “We are apt to judge them by the prices per pound, quart or bushel,  without much regard to the amounts or kinds of actual nutrients which they  contain.” Those words were written by Wilbur Atwater in 1894 (1). They still  hold true today. In 1894, Atwater recognized that different foods varied  greatly in the proportion of water they contained (1). Because water  contributed to food weight but supplied neither nutrients nor calories, Atwater  ignored food weight and calculated instead the amounts of energy and nutrients  that could be obtained from different foods for a given price. At the time,  corn meal, wheat flour and sugar provided the most calories for 25 cents (1).</description>
        </item>
   </channel>
   
</rss>

