Comments for HighTech EDGE

Comment on F-15 Eagle Fighter Jet by Dharmesh

Dharmesh — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:02:02 +0000

enough for air force

Comment on The Challenger 2 by Dharmesh

Dharmesh — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:54:58 +0000

nice tank

Comment on FA-37 New Stealth Fighter Air Craft Jet by Gryphon71

Gryphon71 — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:06:53 +0000

There is a plane, called the Switchblade or Bird of Prey, that has a very similar look with wings that move to three different positions for different functions. Straight out for bombing, swept forward for maneuverability, and fully forward tucked at the sides for speeds up to Mach 3.

Comment on Remotely Destroy Cell Phone Data by joy

joy — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:38:35 +0000

my phone lost on the 11th january 2010.
Nokia-N70-1
Imei: 354551018618060
Code: D536418
Fccid: QFXRM-84
Made in Finland (Under Scandinavia country)
Nokia Line: 01-4666542.
please me destory the phone.
Regards
Joy.

Comment on British Military Invisible Tank by skeptic

skeptic — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:36:05 +0000

1 problem with this technology, it only works if ur looking at it from 1 side. if u place an observer on a flanking maneuver, the tank is history. good luck fighting a war when the enemy is always in front of u.

Comment on Airborne Military Laser Weapons by Zach

Zach — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:46:34 +0000

Thanks for trying, you spelled efficient wrong. If we have the technology and resources to create laser firing turrets on airplanes, we have the technology and resources to alter something we have already created (specifically the avionics) so it can run a magnetic field while maintaining control and communication stability. If this isn’t possible, then it is possible to make a deflective field made out of SOMETHING (probably not plasma, tbh.), so there is no point in arguing about it anyway, which concludes my comment.

Comment on Hot Air Force Babe a Gunner on an AC-130 by devildog

devildog — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:43:56 +0000

She had better watch her tail or some Devil Grunt’s gonna get her.

Comment on How to Remove Scratches from CDs and DVDs by uzair

uzair — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:04:52 +0000

does it works on ps3 games ?

Comment on Top Ten Fighter Planes by kiran

kiran — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:54:55 +0000

If it is the list of ten all-time great warplanes, then it shouldn’t ignore the THUNDERBOLT and F-16..Not sur about ‘Su’s and ‘Mig’s though..

Comment on Top Ten Fighter Planes by Dhiraj

Dhiraj — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:32:39 +0000

I saw about the harrier jump jet it is not so capable as like the HAL Tejas current 4th generation circraft because it can be hit by heat seeking missiles.

Comment on AA-12 Fully Automatic Shotgun by Brian

Brian — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:17:17 +0000

a couple of my friends got our hands on the AA-12 and we unloaded it and holy shit I’ve never met a shotgun close to this….this would be a good gun for riot police only have bean bag rounds shot at crowds

Comment on Cold War Images by Rafael

Rafael — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:52:04 +0000

Explode umas bombas atômicas no Brasil, Rafael Barbará Nunes, Pelotas, Rua São João 288.

Comment on Apple iPad Mac Tablet iBook by Nick

Nick — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:05:33 +0000

The “rumour” that the iPad doesn’t multitask is not really a rumour at all since developers have access to the SDK (which is basically the same as for the iPhone) and are well aware of exactly what that iPad’s capabilities are.
Like the iPhone, iPad can only run one user application at once. That means that when you go back to the home screen, whatever application you were running quits, so it is impossible to run two applications simultaneously, or have one application doing something in the background while another is doing something in the foreground.
For the most part this limitation is a non-issue for ordinary users. The kind of situation where it’s annoying is if you want to listen to say, Spotify streaming music whilst browsing your email, or have an MSN chat open in the corner of the screen whilst working on a spreadsheet. These things are not possible on the iPad.
The tradeoff, and the reason why Apple has made this decision, is that because only one app runs at once it can use the whole power of the processor and consequently iPad (and iPhone, iPod Touch, etc) all run blazingly fast compared to other devices with comparable hardware specs.

Comment on Semi Transparent LCD Screens by JJ

JJ — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:13:57 +0000

Yes,,, already transparent,,, our only major use for transparent screens would be for mobile phones or to get rid of frames on computers and tv’s all together… i think contrast might have a part to play in this… setting the contrast can make the polarizers to not be so intense when blacking out… maybe go for a more gray matter as it will probably make screens see through,,,, this would work well wh sun glasses if it were possible.

Comment on British Military Invisible Tank by Aldiar

Aldiar — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:03:40 +0000

I need real stuff so please help if you can