Horwich and Bolton UK Nationalist Supporters Group

ON THE DEFEAT FOR MAHOMET-HOUSE IN DUDLEY

2012-02-09T12:02:00.000Z

DEFEAT FOR MAHOMET-HOUSE IN DUDLEY

| Written by Rev West |

An application to have a Mohammedan Super-Mosque built in Dudley to be named “The Pride of Dudley” has been unanimously turned-down by the Dudley Development Control Committee which described it as “characterless”, “featureless”, “inappropriate” and, most appropriate of all, “an alien feature.”

A similar Mahomet-House proposal has also been turned down by Maidenhead.

God is still at work in Britain!

Islam which likes to portray itself - with treacherous media, Radio 4 and BBC help - as the “Religion of Peace” is on record as being a Jew-baiting, wife-beating, honour-killing, Israel-phobic religion which has a halal philosophy of cruelty to animals and believes, in its sharia, in the death-penalty for homosexual offenders.

This is surely not hope, but hate, to any normal thinking, reason-using human being in Britain.

But every single major political party in Britain is complicit in a conspiracy of silence on this matter.

This is appeasement, super-appeasement, beyond the wildest imaginations of any.

It veritably puts Neville Chamberlain, the man who sold out to Hitler, into the category of a Hercules!

But there are now signs that ordinary people, and their local authorities, are showing more guts than our spineless and weak leaders in church and state, who seem to care nothing for the future of these islands.

The 14^th century Byzantine or East Roman Emperor, Manuel II Palaiologos, said of Islam, Radio 4’s “Religion of Peace”:

“Show me just what Mahomet brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

Bishop Michael Nazir Ali of the Church of England has said that:

“….given the world view [of Islam]… there can never be sufficient appeasement and new demands will continue to be made."

It was, of course, just the same with Hitler and his aggressive ideology.

The Danger of MAINSTREAM ,Islamic Takeover in Britain

2012-02-08T12:09:00.000Z

The Danger of MAINSTREAM

Written by Rev West at the Christian Council of Britain|

Islamic Takeover in Britain

There can be little doubt that the growing presence of large numbers of Muslims in the West - Britain, Europe [not just the EU], North America and the Antipodes - is a great problem posing a considerable danger to our faith, our society and its values, and to each of those countries of the Western world which have so much in common with ourselves, based as all of them are, on broadly Judeao-Christian, liberal, and democratic values. The immense privileges which we have gained over the long centuries of Christendom are now in danger by the presence of so large and growing a Mohammedan following. We need to be clear about the nature of that following, why it poses so considerable a threat to us, and what its methods are which it is even now currently using to bring the danger to pass. It is no exaggeration to say that, just as we had to see down the Nazis between 1933 and 1945, and the Communists between 1917 and 1991, so we will have to see down this new threat, though in historical terms it is a lot older.

Mainstream Islamic Threat to Christianity

The presence of well-organised Mohammedans among us is a grave threat, though not often recognised, to our Christian faith. The Mohammedans, following their prophet Mohammed or Mahomet (570-632AD), believe that God is simply one and not the Trinity-in-Unity, the Three-in-One. They deny that Jesus is the Son of God and also that He died for our sins being crucified upon the cross. But the Bible says that the one undivided God is Father, Son and Holy Ghost; that the Son is equal in honour to the Father (Jn 5: 22-23); that we must believe in the Son (Jn 8: 24) - and what He did for us men and our salvation - if we are to be saved (1 Cor 15: 3, 4). Mohammed did not like any of this and forbad his followers from believing this, charging them to stop others proclaiming it. In faithfulness to Mohammed, not Christ, his followers now oppose and persecute, sometimes to death, any who bring these glad tidings of great joy which should be to all people. We see increasing Muslim violence against Christians almost everywhere; and it will, sooner or later, come to Britain if it is not here already. There is an issue here of freedom of religious expression and propagation; indeed a question of the freedom to publish and proclaim this good news to all, including to the followers of Mohammed. Wherever Mohammedanism is in power it stops the freedom which is needed to proclaim the gospel. But the gospel of Christ, and the Christian values that flow from it, are something that we all benefit from, even when considering only the good things that it brings in this life. This is because Christianity is the root of a very fruitful tree; and the fruits of Christianity will not long survive where the freedom-constricting and belief-restraining laws of the Mosque prevail. God is indeed great as the Muslims often affirm, and gracious which they tend to ignore; but the Son of God is equally as great and gracious (Jn 17:5; 1 Jn 5: 11, 12). And if we do not have the Son then we do not have the Father either (1 Jn 2: 23).

Mainstream Islamic Threat to the Jews

The Jews also tend to suffer a great deal where large numbers of Mohammedans are able to influence law-making, policy-making and the general social, political, media and educational culture. Islam not only has a problem with the existence of the State of Israel, and the consequent loss of most of Muslim Palestine (which Islam sees as a major affront to its claim to supremacy everywhere), and the treatment that is meted out to the enemies of the State of Israel in the Middle East; Islam also has a problem with the Jewish nation itself whether in the land of Israel or in the Diaspora. Mohammed and his followers conceived a kind of eternal hatred against the Jews because the Jews, and not the Islamic ummah, according to the Old Testament or Talmud, which Mohammed revered, are the chosen nation (Gen 12: 3). Mohammed wanted his own followers to feel that they were the ones who were specially chosen by Allah. Mohammed sought the approval of both the Jews and the Christians, the peoples of the Book, and when this was not given he turned in great bitterness against both. As a result his followers have a great hatred not only for Christianity but also for the nationality of the Jews; the Muslims have a kind of eternal enmity against the Jews for this reason, known as Al-Yahud. It is in the Arab and the Mohammedan world, especially, that copies of Hitler’s Mein Kamph are circulated and propagated with approval and where the fact of the Nazi race-genocide against the Jews, between 1941-1945, is most vehemently denied. The Mufti of Jerusalem visited Hitler during World War II because of the common racial hatred of the Jews which they both shared; and, in Europe, Bosnian Mohammedans joined Hitler’s SS Hansa division as a means of carrying on their eternal war against the people God really did choose. In the New Testament Jesus said that salvation was of the Jews (Jn 4: 22) and the apostle Paul laid down in Romans chapters 9-11 the awful story of the partial rejection of the Jews in God’s plan in order to bring the Gentiles into the true Church - those who have faith in the true God.

The New Testament and the Christian View of the Jews

The special status and love of the Israelite is a little known part, but an important part, of the New Testament Christian faith; and it is a part of the Christian faith, along with the Trinity and the Godhood of Christ (and the death of Christ to atone for our sins) that the followers of Mohammed have an especial dislike for. The President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ahmadinejad, has threatened to wipe the State of Israel off of the map, such is the racial (and religious) hatred of the Muslim for the Jew; and yet we are allowing increasing numbers of these adherents into the whole of the West: something which ought to betoken an increasing level of fear to the Jew and instability to ourselves. Yet our foolish governments continue to allow it to happen.

It is important to be clear what the New Testament, which is part of our Christian faith, says of the Jew. I have already said a lot, elsewhere, about what the whole of the Bible says about nations, nationhood and national homelands. You must not be surprised, therefore, that the New Testament, the especially Christian part of the Bible, has something to say about the chosen nation even though they are, now, very largely in unbelief; a state of affairs that is indeed alluded to in the New Testament. The apostle Paul says that ‘if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world,” which it was, ‘what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead” (Roms 11: 15). He goes on to say ‘that blindness is in part happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles come in.” (Roms 11: 25.) We are living in that time-frame where blindness in part is come to the Jew; but note well they are still the chosen race, collectively, for the sake of the fathers. In Roms 11: 21 Paul refers to them as the ‘natural branches” and, in Roms 9: 3 he refers to them as his ‘kinsmen by race” (Revised Standard Version) ‘kinsman according to the flesh’ in the Authorised Version, and how, though he was the apostle to the Gentiles (Roms 11: 13; Gals 2: 7-9), he could wish himself accursed and cut off from Christ for their sakes. All the blessings of the covenant belong to them pre-eminently - the sonship, the glory, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. Islam - at its inception, being a kind of religious form of extreme Arab nationalism - resented all of this because the Arabs descended from Ishmael, the son of the bondwoman, not Isaac and Jacob in whom Abraham’s privileges shall belong and be transmitted (Gals 4:22-3; Roms 9: 7-13). It is a question of sour grapes, as with so much related to the attitude and outlook of Mohammed.

So we have seen that Mohammedanism dislikes both Christianity and the nation of the Jews intensely for reasons which are deeply religious and historical, and for reasons which to the secular mind may seem almost incomprehensible and unbelievable; but our Christian faith upholds all these points and, as Christians, we must be faithful to them, acknowledging, at the same time, that it is only by individual faith and repentance that anyone can come to Jesus, be they Jew or Gentile: for we are all to seek, by faith only, that righteousness which comes to us by what Christ has done for us, and not by our own efforts and works of the law (Roms 10: 3, 6, 10, 17).

Mainstream Islamic Threat to our Parliamentary Democracy

But why is the presence of large numbers of the followers of Mohammed among us so great a threat to our liberal and national democracy? It is due to the nature of Islam itself and not to the alleged extremism of some radicals within it. By our standards all of Islam is extreme. The roots of Islamic terror indeed go back to Mohammed and only too faithfully repeat what he commanded, practised and enjoined. When the so-called radicals emulate him, they are only being faithful to what he taught and practised; and yet when the so-called moderates try to play this down, they too are, also, only being faithful to doctrines and practices - of patience, stealth and dissimulation - which he also practised and avowed in tandem, depending on the situation which he found himself in: but always with an eye as to which of the conflicting approaches would best achieve the most suitable outcome for the furtherance of his own religion and its ultimate goal of dominating, bit by bit, the whole world.

The object of Islam is extreme: to dominate all. There will be no freedom of religion, no freedom to leave Islam, and no freedom to critique it: the leaving of Islam is seen as apostasy and under the Islamic sharia (or pathway) it carries the death penalty; the criticising of Islam is deemed blasphemy and likewise, under the sharia, carries severe penalties. Islam means submission or surrender and has no concept of individual freedom of choice or lack of compulsion in religion once you are within the faith yourself or if you dwell in the Abode of Islam, the Dar al Islam, where the Mohammedans are in the majority and the laws of the state back-up and support the rule of the Imam and the Mosque.

But in the Abode of War, the Dar al Harb, where Mohammedans are not in the majority, or where Islam has not yet established near total ascendancy, more subtlety or trickery is required to fool the ‘infidels’ into believing that they are safe, until… … the moment comes when they can either be subdued or ‘persuaded’ to submit ‘voluntarily.’ If the latter, all well and good; but if the former then Allah has at least been merciful in giving them time and opportunity to surrender and convert. You may not regard that as very fair or tolerant but you are not coming to it from the perspective of Allah’s apostle; and in any case in the things of Allah their prophet was clear that there could not be, nor would it in principle be right for there to be, any leeway or toleration for what they see as rebellion and apostasy against the one true God. The idea of belief being from the heart and freely given is a Judeao-Christian one, found in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures, not in the Koran, which sees outward conformity or submission as being of the essence of the faith of the whole community.

Jihad not simply confined to Violence

The means used to secure the domination of the whole world, country by country, are often overlooked; but they have become more and more exposed by Islam-scholars and by individuals who have been converted to Christ out of the pit of Mohammedanism. The Rev Dr Patrick Sookhdeo has written a number of books on Islam and is an expert on its terrorist networks and their methods. But works on Muslim terror only deal with the radicals and overlook the greater danger of an Islamic takeover by stealth, as promoted by the comparatively more moderate, but really more slippery and cunning mainstream. We must not be fooled. In particular Dr Sam Solomon and others have written on this. It is mainstream Mohammedanism, not the radicals, which drives the war, or struggle (known in Arabic as jihad), against the non-Islamic world, the unbeliever, the infidel or kaffir - kufr meaning unbelief; and it does so by these other means which often fall short of violence but which may threaten violence against the kaffir, and will certainly use all kinds of pressure - legal, propaganda, cultural, and financial - to bring about either the kaffir’s total submission by conversion to Islam, or his reduction to the status of dhimmitude. This is what Christians and Jews in particular are to be reduced to: it involves establishing an Islamic protectorate over them by which they are made wards of Islam and have to pay a jizya, a humiliating tax for their ‘protection,’ and where they lose equal rights in a Muslim-dominated state and society. This jihad, or struggle, is an ongoing and systematic programme to take over the non-Islamic states in terms of Islam’s own ideology as founded upon the Koran, the Sunnah (trodden path), the hadiths (the written traditions); and the sharia (the Islamic religious laws), as propounded by their scholars (the ulema) from time to time; especially in the early days of the religion but also in current fatwas to meet situations which have not arisen before for which there is no guiding precedent. Jihad can also include terrorism, assassinations, kidnaps, beatings-up, holy war - all in the name of Allah and His apostle - but it is by no means confined to such actual or threatened violence. The whole of the West, as part of the Abode of War, the Dar Al Harb, is currently being subjected to an organised and well-directed institutional, legal, educational and cultural jihad, from Mohammedan pressure to have school girls wear the hijab and “dress modestly”, to pressure on Tescos to sell halal meat, and on the banks to deal in sharia-compliant financial services.

Immigration and Swamping is another means of Jihad

One main way of promoting this kind of jihad is by hirja: migration or swamping. Following the precedent of Mohammed’s flight or migration to Medina from Mecca, his followers have historically been bidden, likewise, to migrate to further the struggle and spread the faith. It can be within one country, such as from Leicester to Peterborough, or Peterborough to Boston, or it can be between countries, from Morocco to England or Libya to Scotland; but though it may be presented as all kinds of things, its object and its effect is to keep the migrating community of Mohammed’s followers together so that they can then dominate a locality and spread the Middle East. Fleeing from it? They are bringing it with them; that is the whole point! Hirja or migration is one of the main ways now being pursued to subject the West to Islam and to turn Europe, especially, into Eurabia.

“Islam Means Peace” is another means of Jihad by Takiyya or Deception.

Another way of ensuring that this kind of jihad-promotion is protected is by means of takiyya (deception) - Koranic injunctions for a “viable survival through deception” where the Muslims are still in the minority and may yet be vulnerable. Takiyya, which means deception, is the most irreligious of doctrines for it countenances and enjoins lying for the cause - in other words doing evil that ‘good’ may come (Roms 3: 8). That is what they think of you as an ‘infidel’, a non-Muslim. It is practised at the personal level and at the community level through its leaders and institutions and it is used by arrogant and evil Muslims even under oath, backed up often by their Mosques, to falsely accuse Christians, and Jews, either for personal gain or to wage jihad against their communities. In the media these Mohammedans constantly trot out the lie that Islam is a peaceful religion. No it is not: it is one of the most vile, violent and depraved religions that have cursed the Earth and which has held back large areas of mankind in servitude, sexual debasement and depravity, and intellectual backwardness for centuries.

Thus Islamic jihad, both the violent and the non-violent varieties, are all of a piece in the struggle of Mohammed, and his followers, against all who have not yet submitted to the crescent god. Mohammedanism, in all its forms and in all the ways it is being promoted, is thus one of several great threats that the West, broadly defined, is now facing, and which it must defeat if its way of life is to be preserved and prosper. As we fought Hitler and the followers of Lenin and Marx so we must take on the false prophet of Allah who even now, from the grave, seeks to destroy us. And of one thing we can be certain: Christ, the Lord God and the Son of God shall prevail.

All scripture quotations are from the King James Authorised Version (1611) unless otherwise stated. The Revised Standard Version has been quoted in one place where it is helpful (Roms 9:3) though it is generally unreliable, especially on Christology and on its underlying text of the New Testament.

2,785 British Jobs Advertised in Romania

2012-02-07T22:01:00.003Z

2,785 British Jobs Advertised in Romania

from BNP News

By Jennifer Matthys - Unemployment in the UK is still soaring, but that doesn’t stop British bosses offering thousands of jobs to Romanian workers over British ones.

The number of British unemployed has now reached a 17 year high of 2.68 million.

And yet, despite this, 2,785 vacancies, including roles for nurses, engineers, chefs and other skilled workers, are being advertised by an online recruitment agency in Bucharest, Romania.

The firm says that British companies are trying to fill these jobs with Romanian workers.

Earlier this month, UK unemployment hit 8.4%, the highest level since 1994. And now official figures show that nine out of ten jobs created in 2010 went to foreign nationals.

Phil McCabe, of the Forum of Private Business, said “If there are British workers that are ready, willing and skilled enough to do these jobs then it is absolutely right that those jobs should be offered first to British workers.

“However from talking to our members, we have found that there is a shortage of skilled workers from the UK, and many people have basic skills lacking such as numeracy and literacy.

“In addition young people’s attitudes are sometimes found to be lacking, so advertising in Romania possibly reflects this situation.”

In the South West, there are currently 176,000 unemployed people living there, and yet a whole host of taxi driving jobs in the region are currently being advertised in Romania.

Meanwhile, in the South East, there are 276,000 jobless people, yet supposedly many hotel worker jobs are available here and advertised in Romania.

A Letter to: Mr Richard Brasher Chief Executive, UK Operations TESCO

2012-02-03T17:45:00.001Z

A Letter to: Mr Richard Brasher Chief Executive, UK Operations TESCO
| PostAuthorIconWritten by Rev West | PDF Print E-mail

Dear Mr Brasher,

I wish to protest in the strongest terms against your charities policy to support 'gay pride' perversion.

It is also outrageous that TESCO should succumb to Islamic demands in providing halal meat products.

Consequently, I will be encouraging your customers to shop elsewhere.

The attached documents outline the basis of my complaints.

In the wake of the Prime Minister's call to defend the 'values and moral code' of the Bible, I too would remind you that our Christian heritage rules out both homosexuality and Islam. We promote both at our peril.

Yours faithfully,

Dr Alan C. Clifford

______________________________

The Revd Alan C. Clifford

BA, MLitt, PhD

Pastor, Norwich Reformed Church

www.nrchurch.co.nr

A call for balance, a call for truth

2012-01-24T18:39:00.002Z

Liz Jones of the Daily Mail - Racist

2012-01-17T12:55:00.000Z

Liz Jones of the Daily Mail - Racist

Written by Green Arrow

January 2012

The trouble is, the Daily Mail is run by people who really hate the True British but being greedy bastards they know that to retain their falling readership they have to report on some stories that are critical of the establishment and are in tune with right thinking British People.

However, behind the scenes, they are about as anti-white as you can get (the Saint Stephen Lawrence Love Affair) and rest assured there is nothing more sick, evil and dangerous than an anti-white renegade who puts all other races before their own.

One such renegade is the evil bitch Liz Jones, who is a columnist for the rag and is the real face of the Daily Mail.

This revolting and snobby creature has a habit of offending normal decent people. There was the outrage when she made light of the murder of Jo Yeates when she criticised the way the murdered woman spent her last few hours for a start.

A vegetarian anorexic who hates the country, she made a few pounds from a book that attacked the countryside and the people who lived in it, saying that they were old, smelly, hairy and did not wear Prada.

The book was written after she did a white flight and then found out that she missed her trendy yuppy London bars and fancy restaurants before scuttling back to Sewer City. She then whined that the countryside people did not take to her - personally they should have thrown her in the nearest midden.

This creature also upset women, when she penned a piece in which she proudly confessed to stealing a black lovers semen to have a child. How decent of her to offer to dispose of the condom. She figured she had actually paid for the sperm because, as she says, she kept the man in food. Is that paying for sex?

By now you should have learnt enough to make a sound judgement about this sick creatures life but there is a bit more that you should read that shows that she is clearly insane as well as a vile anti-white racist who I would not urinate on were she on fire.

An hat tip to Ace Patriot for reminding us of this story from 2009 in which the creature writes as a headline - I've never lived with a white man, but racism is still there in my DNA.

Today I am going to reveal something I have never written about before (and you thought there were no more guts to spill).
Here we go. I’ve never had a relationship with a white man. I’ve never had sex with a white man, although I have kissed the odd one, many years ago.

Such is her hatred for white people that she even has a pop at the white whore, Cheryl Cole for going out with a black, who had "Caucasian" features, saying that Cole had a racist fetish for dark skin. Talk about barking mad.

Originally - she writes - that she first started dating blacks because it was "fashionable" and "cool" before moving on to Asians who were the "new blacks" and so much more intelligent because they could write books.

White people, no matter how many community projects we might fund or months we might serve fighting for a foreign cause, are capable of racist thoughts and actions that need to be stamped on, hard.

Told you she was an evil bitch. Just do not pay for any newspaper - all you do is make rich bitches like Liz Jones richer.

And todays white renegade is Alasdair Palmer of the crap Telegraph who delights in writing:

"There are around seven million people in Britain who were not born in this country. One hope for a more peaceful future is that the demarcation lines between ethnic groups are being blurred. Put simply, people are falling in love and having children. The most accurate estimate suggests there may be two million Britons with at least one non-white parent. So it’s getting harder for racists to talk in terms of “us versus them”.

Just so you understand what this cess pit serpent is saying. He is saying nothing about 7 million unwanted and univited colonisers - he is welcoming the white genocide. A pox on him and may it take him quick.

Chris Bryant MP - Paliament is a Gay Bar Now

2012-01-16T22:51:00.001Z

Chris Bryant MP - Paliament is a Gay Bar Now

Written by Green Arrow

January 2012

Chris Bryant, the homosexual MP for Rhonda and former Common Purpose manager, who is mainly remembered for posing in grubby soiled underpants whilst texting: "I'd love a good long f**k" to a stranger he met on a website for homosexuals - who enjoys the sick delights of "fisting" and "rimming" - is in the news again.

It seems that our sick corrupt parliament is now so full of perverts and paedophiles frequenting the Strangers Bar, that he has announced that his "husband" is worried about him going to work.

No "husband" was not a mistake. Bryant shamefully dumped on all Christians and the Law when he managed to get the poisonous Ashkenazi Dwarf and Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow to allow him and the creature he calls his "husband" to waive the law and allow Bryant to "tie the knot" in the Chapel of the Palace of Westminster, despite the law saying that houses of worship can not conduct civil partnership ceremonies.

"Indeed, sometimes when you go into the Strangers Bar you feel as though you are in Rupert Street [in Soho]. It is virtually a gay bar now, and my husband sometimes worries about whether I should be allowed in there any more."

Well thanks for the tip about Rupert Street - I shall never be able to cuddle my Teddy again - but his statement about the numbers of homosexuals in the government, should give you some understanding about why there is a drive by the establishment to promote homosexuality in our class rooms. You should now also understand on just how the law on sodomising children was passed, despite it being against the wishes of the British Public - because Parliament is run by an homosexual mafia.

Well you get what you vote for and clearly the people of the Rhonda have no problems with their sons being sodomised by paedophiles once they reach the age of 16.

To me, sodomy is an aberration and whilst the law may say it is legal, any person carrying out such an act on a 16 year old boy is a paedophile in my eyes as well as obviously a pervert.

You should also know, that there is something much stronger than even organisations like the Masons - it is stronger even than a chain of steel - and that is a Daisy Chain of linked homosexual MPs, who put those they have "bonded" with before anything else in their sordid lives.

PRAISE GOD FROM WHOM ALL BLESSINGS FLOW!

2012-01-08T15:45:00.001Z

PRAISE GOD FROM WHOM ALL BLESSINGS FLOW!

Written by Rev West |

CHRISTIANS rejoice in the benefits they receive in the knowledge they have of Christ Jesus. This knowledge is both intellectual and experiential and gives them a lift in all the perspectives that they have in their experience of the trials, temptations - and joys and blessings - of this life. As Great Britain, even the whole world, heads towards an economic depression (or worse); as evil men wax or grow worse and worse; as political and Church leaders seem to fail us and fail Christ the King; the genuine Christian does, and can, look up to the supreme head over all things to the Church (Ephesians 1: 22), even the great God our Saviour, Christ Himself (Titus 2: 13).

JESUS said that in the world we would have tribulation but we are to be of good cheer for “I”, He says, “Have overcome the world” (John 16: 33). There is clearly a lot going on in our country, which is being effected by evil men, promoting great evils and thinking all the time that they can, and will, get away with it. But that does not change the fact that it is God, not man, who is the ruler of men and lifts up whom He wishes, and puts down whom He will (Daniel 4: 35, 37); and that He will bring the most high and lofty word, and look, to the most terrible and awesome judgment. Fools mock at this. Only fools would. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Hebrews 10: 31)!

OUR job is to rejoice in Him and what He brings, be it good or ill (Philippians 4: 11); and to do so with joy abounding and full of glory (1 Peter 1: 8). Oh! Praise Him all ye heavenly host. But we are also to occupy till He comes (Luke 19: 13). We, in the Christian Council of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, will continue to be doing this, as will others; recognising, however, that it is not our fight but His who has all earthly power and Heavenly glory. Hell is rising but it will never, can never, prevail against the Son of the living God and the true Church, the true community of faith, which He (and only He) can build (Matthew 16: 18).

Nigeria: An Object Lesson In African Financial Management

2012-01-04T18:46:00.000Z

Nigeria: An Object Lesson In African Financial Management

Written by John of Gwent

January 2012

Prompted by the previous article, I just spent five minutes browsing the BBC news web site to see whether they were circling like vultures waiting for someone else to kill their next meal for them, or whether they had, as I suspected, long since taken their fill of Emma West's story and moved on. As some will already know, last year brought me a once-in-a lifetime opportunity to study the behaviour of the Electronic News Gathering vulture and it was no surprise to me to see thay have found new pickings.

But my eye fell upon a story that I feel outlines just where this country is headed should those running it, and those who ran it for the thirteen years before that, continue to have their way.

It seems that there is uproar in Nigeria this morning as fuel prices have doubled overnight owing to the withdrawal of the state subsidy on petrol. Yesterday a litre of petrol cost roughly what it cost us the day I passed my driving test, twenty six pence a litre.

Today it costs what it cost us after three years of John Major's Fuel Duty Escalator, sixty pence a litre.

The reason is that the Nigerian government has withdrawn a state subsidy on the pump price of petrol it imports.

The key word there, the word that explains everything that anyone needs to know about that sorry shithole of a Black African State is not as some people might think "subsidy". It is the word import.

For the truth is that this shining beacon for the achievement of the Black Man in his own continent is a country that produces and exports more crude oil than any other African country, yet it is so riven with corruption and anarchy that it cannot get its act together to construct its own petrol refinery and must instead import petrol for its people.

Having said that, I see that Newport Council have recently been handed a planning application for a licence to drill for oil and gas in the fields just south of Nash College. What a splendid opportunity for the positive discrimination multiculturalists to bring us the advantages of energy policy as advocated by the indigenous population of the Dark Continent.

Good Luck to Ron Paul - The World's Last Hope?

2012-01-03T18:38:00.001Z

Good Luck to Ron Paul - The World's Last Hope?

Written by Green Arrow

Monday, January 2012

Today, Tuesday 3rd of January, one of the most important elections in the history of the world will take place when the Republican Candidates make their first pitch to lead their party into the American equivalent of our General Election.

Although the vote that takes place, in what is known as the Iowa caucus, is just the start of a six month run-up to the 2012 American Presidential 2012 elections, it is the most important, as it will be a good indicator as to which Republican candidate will be officially nominated to lead the Republican Party into the election.

You can learn more about how the American electoral system works by clicking here.

So why is who gets to run America important to us in the UK?

Well if you do not know that we are little more than a puppet of America, itself a puppet of the NWO, then you are as ignorant as those foolish people who support the Pepsi Cola Party.

Ron Paul, a truly patriotic Republican candidate, understands exactly how the world works, which is why the NWO media are saying so little about him.

Ron Paul is totally opposed to the planned wars against Syria and Iran and has been an outspoken critic of most of America's foreign so called interventions in the past.

Support for Texas Congressman Ron Paul has slipped a little after he was challenged about his non-interventionist foreign policy views.
"I may come in first, I may come in second. I doubt I'll come in third or fourth," he told CNN.

Mr Paul opposes intervention in Iran over the issue of nuclear weapons and wants to end US aid to Israel and other allies.

Standing firm, he told CNN: "I would say that we just need to be more cautious. I think if we overreact and participate in bombing Iran, we're looking for a lot more trouble."

Now there is little we can do in this country to affect the results tomorrow in Iowa but the least we can do is pray for a Ron Paul victory, because I truly believe he is Americas and the worlds last hope for a peaceful solution to all our problems.

Now then, you must and I mean MUST watch the following video. You must watch it for two reasons. The first is because it provides information on the activities of the anti-American "elite" and secondly because it contains one of the greatest political campaign songs I have ever listened to.

No Frames

It is by Aimee Allen singing "Ron Paul Revolution" and the lyrics really do say it all about America and who runs a country that is in as big a mess as our country. Please, please watch it in full.

Once you have seen the video why not go take a look at the Ron Paul Restore America site.

Can Britain survive the Islamic conquest of our nation?

2011-12-31T13:04:00.000Z

Can Britain survive the Islamic conquest of our nation?

Written by Jim Dowson of Britain First

December 2011

Can Britain survive the Islamic conquest of our nation?

Time to face some facts folks, and you won’t like them but how we react to them will decide the fate of our nation, race and future.

I would like to make a simple projection based on the increasing numbers of articles found now even in the ‘liberal press’ that claim that the Muslim population is rising so fast that the Islamification of Britain is not only a possibility but an absolute inevitable certainty within a lifetime.

Muslim population figures (about half of what I believe is the true reality, but let’s use them anyway and err on the side of a conservative estimate/projection):

2004: 1,870,000
2005: 2,017,000
2006: 2,142,000
2007: 2,327,000
2008: 2,422,000

Source: Labour Force Survey

If we make a table, we can find out other information from this such as the numerical increase and the percentage change from the year before.

The Muslim population rose on average by 6.45% per annum.

So, assuming that this 6.45% increase is maintained, and not increased (remember we are already using the Governments extremely LOW figures to start with) we can see the results in a few short years.

Unfortunately the ‘Iron Law of Population’ is irreversible, unstoppable and during thousands of years of human history….never wrong!

THE PROJECTION

The key milestones based on the projection are:

2013 - 3 million Muslims in the UK.
2018 - 4 million Muslims in the UK.
2021 - 5 million Muslims in the UK.
2024 - 6 million Muslims in the UK.
2026 - 7 million Muslims in the UK.
2029 - 8 million Muslims in the UK.
2031 - 9 million Muslims in the UK.
2032 - 10 million Muslims in the UK
2039 - The Muslim population will be increasing by 1 million per annum at this point.
2043 - 20 million Muslims in the UK.
2050 - 30 million Muslims in the UK.
2051 - The Muslim population will be increasing by 2 million per annum at this point.
2054 - 40 million Muslims in the UK.
2057 -The Muslim population will be increasing by 3 million per annum at this point.
2058 - 50 million Muslims in the UK.
2060 - 60 million Muslims in the UK.
2061 - The Muslim population will be increasing by 4 million per annum at this point.
2063 - 70 million Muslims in the UK.
2065 - 80 million Muslims in the UK. (Muslim population will be increasing by 5 million per annum at this point)
2067 - 90 million Muslims in the UK. (Muslim population will be increasing by 6 million per annum at this point)
2069 - 100 million Muslims in the UK.
2070 - The Muslim population will be increasing by 7 million per annum at this point.

The official government projection claims the UK's population will be roughly 71.5 million people in 2033.

According to this extremely conservative Muslim population projection, the Muslim population will possibly be roughly 11 million.

Therefore 11 million/71.5 million X 100 = Muslims will be at the very least 15.4% of the total population of the UK and will be made up of vast legions of young people, while our population will be overwhelmingly old.

As you can see from the tables above, when the Islamic population reaches their optimum breeding plateau (around 2035) their already terrifying and overwhelming numbers will rocket to truly apocalyptic proportions.

Can Britain survive this? Honestly my friend, can you, in clear conscience and sound mind say yes?

It is my sincere and honest opinion that no nation on earth could withstand even half of an onslaught of this magnitude, so no.

I do not think we even have a slim chance of surviving this in any present recognisable form.

But I am sure some Britons will survive and go on to secure a part of our Islands as a safe homeland for themselves and their children but even that will only be maintained by a military prowess and a martial people.

That’s as good as it MAY get, and even that would require superhuman effort, suffering and resilience from many generations of patriots.

To believe otherwise is a dangerous delusion and wastes the little precious time we have left to prepare our children for a very uncertain future.

No one likes to peer into the abyss, but whether you keep your eyes closed or not, the abyss still exists and our children and grandchildren are relying on our keen eyes and bold vision for the future so that they might survive.

My friend, are YOUR eyes open or will you go quietly into the night, taking future generations of your own blood with you as you blindly lead them over the edge into an abyss from which no one or nation ever returns.

What we are entering now, both here and right across Europe, will be our new ‘dark age’.

It may well last a thousand years but our peoples survival is all I really care about, everything else is but dross, fantasy and wishful daydreams.

It is our duty in this time remaining to prepare, to educate and to invigorate so that future generations may effectively resist.

But if we fail, then our people and perhaps all people of our blood across the globe and the whole world and all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new dark age made more sinister, and more deadly by the power of a perverted religion.

Let us then settle down with serious realism and stoic determination and go about our sacred duty as parents, as nationalists and as patriots.

It is we, in our generation and time on this earth who must build the stout foundations that will one day shield our children from the wrath of the fanatical Mohammedan locusts who are intent on devouring our once green and pleasant land.

Therefore, let us brace ourselves and be resolved to do all within our power to be the ‘watchmen on the walls’, to sound the alarm so eventually even the most distracted amongst our people will hear our warning cries.

This is our task, our duty and our legacy.

As we enter a new year, may I respectfully enquire of you my friend: How will YOU go about this most earnest of responsibilities?

It is my most urgent personal desire that we enter 2012 with focused minds, pure hearts and a fervent desire to put all old quarrels, misunderstandings and divisions behind us and join as one people, with one goal…the survival of all we love and care for.

If this is your heart’s desire, you are welcome on board and I look forward to our toil together as we perform our duty as best we can in these days where the light still shines, albeit already somewhat diminished, for soon our children will have to toil under a blood red crescent moon and its suffocating cloak of darkness, conflict and ignorance that may last a thousand years.

Let us make 2012 the year when WE woke up and started to build a secure future for our country and those we love.

Let this be our ‘New year’ resolution, one we dare not break!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem

2011-12-04T21:09:00.000Z

Everybody says there is this RACE problem

Written by Green Arrow

December 2011

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Source: The Mantra

In your opinion I'm a racist:
You're just saying that because I'm white

Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white

Recommended viewing.

Some White British Genocide Facts.

One in three of the current population of London were born overseas.

One in six of the population of the United Kingdom were born overseas.

These colonisers hate our past, they envy what the white race has created - in short they hate the white race.

The white population of the world is now less than 8% with only 2% being white women capable of bearing children. It is the whites who are the real minority. Wake up and put your own people first.

V For ‘Visitor’ Rights

2011-11-26T16:57:00.000Z

V For ‘Visitor’ Rights

Posted by BNP Ideas on Nov, 2011

By Southwest Nationalist.

Experts writing for journal Astrobiology have speculated that alien life may exist within our solar system – the moon Titan, in orbit around Saturn, in fact.

It’s interesting that Stephen Hawking speculates that, in order to survive, humanity must one day colonise the stars.

Is that when we run out of room and resources due to the catastrophic – and largely man made – population explosions in Africa and Asia, or when we render the planet barren and radioactive in the inevitable wars that will arise due to the same overpopulation?

One always wonders why we’re so desperate to find alien life at any rate.

We’ve all seen V – the original, not that awful soap opera with aliens remake – no good will come of it.

Not that the aliens would have to invade us by force.

Give them a week and they’ll be signing on down at the local DSS, before returning to a council house kindly provided by the local authorities.

We’ll have changes in the law so that those aliens can eat their halal, err sorry, human dinners, and loads of rights groups will spring up to defend them.

Say a bad word about them and you’ll be in prison, you nasty interstellar racist you, equality is universal.

We’d probably get Labour offering the aliens special political wings in the party, and Nick Clegg whining that the extra-terrestrials have trouble getting bank loans.

And, of course, any aliens who did attack us would just be a small minority, they’re the visitors of peace you know – you can imagine the politically correct media and politicians swarming all over that one.

Nope, those aliens are best left undiscovered, we’ve enough problems here already with aliens of our own.

Whose Children in Need? Not Ours!

2011-11-23T19:33:00.000Z

Whose Children in Need?

Written by Green Arrow

November 2011

The annual opportunity for 2nd rate celebrities to get their faces noticed by the public has just ended, with a record £26 million being donated by the gullible British Public to Children in Need.

Now were the money being raised for the benefit of True British Children, then I would not have a problem but again the ever generous British are being used like little tiny birds to assist voracious cuckoos in our nest.

Cuckoos that will one day show their gratitude by throwing the British out of the nest completely. There will be no aid for us I can assure you.

Before I give you a link that you will find quite enlightening, I want you to think on this - Charity begins at home, or at least it should. The people today behind nearly EVERY single charity, are in it mainly for the money they make for themselves and then to undermine and weaken the True British People.

Below are some of the "worthy causes" that were provided with your mone by Children in Need in August of this year. See if you think that the recipients deserve the money.

For the full list please go here and try not to be sick. It is difficult to remove vomit from a keyboard. By the way if you find any assistance to a specifically white or Christian group then let me know because I could not locate one. Also remember this is just one months assistance.

Harrow Association of Somali Voluntary Organisations
Harrow £9,624 This project will run a holiday club for young people from the Somali community which will involve creative writing, sports and arts.

Horn of Africa Youth Association Hayes £16,500 The project will provide support to children from an asylum seeker and refugee background, specifically around housing and employment.

Sahan Society Centre Hayes £51,230 This project will provide a support service to children with special educational needs and their families, who are from the Somali community.

Somali Community Advancement Organisation London £5,850 This project will provide weekend lessons in Maths, English and Science for young people from the Somali or other East African communities, who face a range of disadvantage and who are struggling at school.

Crossworld FC London £6,130 This project will provide football training for young asylum seekers and refugees to improve their health and well being.

African Cultural Association Barnet London £6,135 This project will provide cultural activities for disadvantaged young people including arts and crafts, jewellery making, textiles and design.

West London Moroccan Widadia London £8,372 This project will provide a homework club and reading support to young people from the Moroccan community who are struggling at school.

Ivorian and African French Speaking Women Action Group
London £9,000 Through providing music workshops and tuition, this project will promote positive relationships between children and young people from other cultural backgrounds who face a range of disadvantage.

African Womens Care London £9,500 This project will provide a programme of support to young people who have experienced some form of personal abuse or domestic violence.

Wings Of Hope Community Association London £9,910 This project will deliver sporting activities, dance sessions and healthy living advice at weekends for disadvantaged young people from the North African community.

YouthSpace London £10,000 This project will provide a two week residential for young boys from the orthodox Jewish community who live in over crowded conditions and who would not otherwise have this opportunity.

Beis Rochel Community Group London £10,000 This project will provide a summer holiday activity programme for girls from the Orthodox Jewish community who wouldn't otherwise have this opportunity.

Voice 4 Somali London £10,000 This project will provide regular weekend classes to improve the educational attainment of young people from the Somali community who are failing at school.

African Women Group London £10,000 This project will provide a weekly homework club for girls of African origin who face a range of disadvantage and are struggling at school.

Bromley Somali Community Association London £26,854 This project will provide supplementary classes for children and young people from low income Somali families who are struggling at school. This will enable them to improve their educational attainment, aspirations and self confidence.

Somali and Somaliland Lewisham Community London £27,600 Through the provision of supplementary classes this project will help
children and young people who are struggling at school to improve
their numeracy, literacy and increase their self confidence.

Helping Hands Support Association London £28,101 This project will provide tuition in English, Maths and Science for children and young people from ethnic minority backgrounds and who are underachieving at school.

Bikur Cholim Dsatmar Trust (Home Hospital Link) London £52,300 This project will provide support to children and young people primarily
from the Jewish community, who have a family member or sibling with
an illness or disability.

Uganda Community Relief Association London £61,100 This project will work with children and young people with HIV or AIDS through the provision of creative, sporting and leisure activities and supportive information to help them plan positively for the future and
increase their confidence.

Fashion and Development Centre Southall £10,000 This project will match young mentors with young people from refugee backgrounds to support them with their school work and help them achieve their goals for the future.

Blessing Family Association Thornton Heath £9,405 Through the provision of supplementary classes this project will help to integrate refugee children and young people into mainstream schools, improve their numeracy, literacy and increase their self confidence.

Nekh Welfare Foundation Barking £9,000 This project will provide after-school classes for young people from ethnic minority communities in East London, to address issues of truancy, underachievement and language barriers at school.

Midaye Somali Development Network London £4,868 This project will provide Saturday supplementary classes for children and young people from low income Somali families in Kensington and Chelsea.

Hackney Playbus London £9,101 The Hackney Playbus will provide a range of activities for children from the traveller community in East London, giving them somewhere safe to play and helping them to access local services.

Bengali International London £9,660 This project will provide recreational activities in a safe setting for young people living on a deprived estate in East London.

St Peter's Community and Advice Centre London £9,875 This project will provide healthy eating advice and sports sessions for girls from the Bangladeshi community living in low income families in East London.

Yismach Moshe Community Group London £10,000 This project will provide a 12 day summer holiday programme for boys, aged 0-15, from low income Orthodox Jewish families, living in Hackney.

SAIL (Summer Adventure for Inner Londoners)London £10,000 This project will provide a 2 week residential holiday to Manchester for 100 young males, aged 13-16, who are from low income Orthodox Jewish families living in Hackney and Haringey.

Muslim Womens Assn Southwark London £2,740 This project will provide day trips for children from the Muslim community, most of whom are recent arrivals to the UK, some seeking asylum, and some from low income families. They hope to develop confidence, language skills and well being.

Baraka Youth Association London £18,300 This project will provide supplementary Maths English classes, football and swimming sessions, for children and young people from refugee and asylum-seeking families in Kensington and Chelsea.

Community Music Ltd. London £20,238 This project will provide music lessons for Bengali and Bangladeshi young people living in deprived communities in East London.

Hammersmith Community Gardens Association London £23,650 This project will provide an environmental playscheme for children and young people from low income families, living in Hammersmith and Fulham.

Sierra Leone Refugee Welfare Association London £25,950 This project will provide an after-school club for children from refugee
communities to help support them with their education and integration
in to the UK.

Kongolese Centre For Information Advice London £28,094 This project will provide Saturday sporting activities for children and young people from refugee and asylum seeking communities in Westminster, enabling them to become physically active and improve their communication skills.

To be added to as soon as I get some more time

Big Hat Tip to Daz of the British Resistance Paltalk Room.

The Ethnic Cleansing of Bolton and Britain and European Nations

2011-11-19T17:16:00.001Z

The Ethnic Cleansing of Britain and European Nations Around the Globe: What Can Be Done?

Posted at BNP Ideas Nov 2011

Yesterday’s news—not unexpected—that Third World immigrants now make up the majority of secondary school pupils in London has underlined the reality that unless the immigration disaster is solved soon, Britain, and indeed all Western First World nations, will be ethnically cleansed of white people within a few decades.

When the white civilisations of the ancient world were overrun, there were always new territories and new lands to be opened.

When Mesopotamia fell, Egypt arose. When Egypt fell, classical Greece arose. When classical Greece fell, Rome arose. When Rome fell, the European states arose.

Then the New World was opened, and North America, Australia, and New Zealand were added as white heartlands.

Now, however, these are all threatened by mass Third World immigration. There are no more new territories or lands to be opened. It is the final call for white Western civilisation.

Can the West survive? The simple answer is yes, provided some basic steps are taken.

1. First and foremost, white people must have more children.

All other political activity is meaningless without this fundamental building block.

History, politics, and human affairs are the product of demography. A failure to breed is punished by Nature with extinction.

2. Political activity must be directed at awakening as many white European people as possible to the reality of race and its underpinning of world events.

3. This political activity must always be done in the idiom of the time. All attempts at political necrophilia (which seek to recreate certain past time periods, such as the Ku Klux Klan/Confederacy or National Socialist Germany) are doomed to failure.

The era of “white supremacy” is gone, and all attempts to recreate it are foolish. The white race will live or die in the twenty-first century, and not in the centuries gone by.

4. This political activity must always be directed in reasonable, moderate, and socially acceptable language, terms, and presentation. There is, after all, nothing wrong with demanding the same rights which are accorded to all Third World nations (freedom from colonization and the right to self-determination) for First World nations. It is, in fact, entirely reasonable and normal.

5. This political activity must not be restricted to “only” publishing the odd book, website, or journal.

It is a non sequitur to argue that there “are no politicians who support the interests of white people” when the people who make that complaint are not involved in practical politics. Of course there will be no pro-white politicians if all the politically-aware people who are pro-white, do not campaign and stand for office.

6. Political realism must be the watchword for all activists. Too many enter politics with false expectations of instant victory, and burn out when the expected glory does not materialize.

Activists must be aware that the racial worldview goes against nearly a century of leftist indoctrination.

The mass media is, for the greatest part, completely hostile and in the hands of those who applaud the racial destruction of the West.

It is no easy ride, and victories on a pro-white political platform are, simply put, the hardest-to-achieve objectives which any activist will experience.

7. Fortunately, it is not necessary to win outright. All that is needed is for a significant minority of Western people to be awakened to the racial realities.

The biggest threat to the future existence of the white race does not come from other racial groups, but rather from the sway which white liberals hold over society.

All other races and groups do what they do because the ruling white liberal elite allows it.

And therein lies the rub; the nature of modern liberalism is suicidal.

Liberals will, given enough time, destroy themselves. They will stop having children; they will miscegenate, and they will then cease to exist.

As long as pro-white political activists have had sufficient children and engaged in sensible, reasonable political activity, their political views will be unopposed among the surviving white community.

Those who might argue that the racially-conscious surviving numbers will be too small to matter, should be aware that the founding European population in Upper Paleolithic times was no more than a few hundred thousand at most.

There are already more people than that—millions, in fact—who have voted for pro-white or anti-immigration parties in Europe.

There is no cause for pessimism about numbers.

8. Finally, the surviving white communities will have to be realistic about their geographic circumstances.

It is no good to be a racially-conscious minority in a sea of hostile nonwhites, as the Afrikaners in South Africa discovered to their cost.

As such, serious consideration will have to be given to white geographic consolidation once the time comes.

In this regard, Eastern Europe and “white Russia” are likely to play a decisive role in providing a homeland in which white people from around the world will be able to reform, regroup, and survive—and hopefully learn from the lessons of history.

Is any of this possible? You, dear reader, and your actions, will help decide the answer to that question.

*This article was taken from the final section of the new version of March of the Titans, The Complete History of the White Race by Arthur Kemp, available here.

Lord Justice Neuberger: The Judiciary and the Ethnic Oppression of White Males

2011-11-19T11:20:00.000Z

Lord Justice Neuberger: The Judiciary and the Ethnic Oppression of White Males

Written by Tim Heydon

November 2011

‘(Herrnstein and Murray’s) ‘The Bell Curve’ is a fact of life. The blacks on average score 85% per cent on IQ and it is accurate, nothing to do with culture. The whites score an average 100. (East) Asians score more…the ‘Bell Curve’ authors put it at least 10 points higher. These are realities that, if you do not accept, will lead to frustration because you will be spending money on wrong assumptions and the results cannot follow.’

- Lee Kuan Yew,. Prime Minister /Minister Mentor Of Singapore (Quoted in the Official Biography).

Should we be surprised that the Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Neuberger has demanded that more women and ethnic minorities should be appointed to the judiciary, at the expense of white males?

Should we heck.

Does Neuberger at some Level think he is protecting his Ethnic Interests as a Jew?

As a Jew, Neuberger is of course himself a member of an ethnic minority. It is perhaps not surprising that as such he should want the majority population to be elbowed out of such positions. Stripping the majority population of its majority rights is generally seen by ethnic minorities as an excellent thing in itself since it confers power on themselves and so (they think) makes their own position in the country more secure. That is why they tend to be leftists and liberals like Neuberger. This attitude is selfish, unfair and ultimately likely to be dangerous.

What Democracy is For

The Greatest Happiness of the greatest Number

Politically Correct Liberals like Neuberger tend to forget or try to ignore what democracy - rule by the majority - is for. It exists in societies such as ours because in them the guiding principle is fundamentally the utilitarian one of the greatest happiness of the greatest number (or some variation thereof). Majorities have superior rights to enforce their interests or ought to have them simply by virtue of being majorities.

The Replacement of Force in the Exercise of Power

Even more important perhaps is the fact that the democratic process is a device for replacing force in the getting and wielding of power. While they insult and work to destroy the democratic rights of the ethnic majority at every turn with Marxoid ideologies and devices such as ‘Human Rights’, liberals simultaneously rely on that majority’s aquiescence and good will without which their liberalism would not survive for a week. When these are not readily forthcoming, as increasingly in this country, they rely on Political Oppression including the championing of the existing sham of a democratic system which works to their advantage and the systematic , calculated demoralisation of the majority.

When Democracy Disappears, Force will Reappear

But when majorities see that their interests are consistently and as an act of policy being deliberately overridden in favour of those of minorities, the result in the end might very well be explosive. That is, in the right conditions including the manifest absence of true democracy as orchestrated by an unrepresentative political class, which is increasingly widely being recognised as the case in Britain now, the majority might revert to violence including political extremism to enforce its interests.

Harsh Economic Conditions and Oppression of the Majority are the Seed Bed of Violence

That is especially the case in the harsh economic climate that stretches ahead into the indefinite future. This is the danger, or one of them, that those like Neuberger who advocate ‘affirmative action’ ie anti-native British discrimination and oppression, run in advocating this course. There are already rumblings along these lines in this country. At the present rate it won’t be so very long before they burst out into serious civil disturbances

The Farthest a Fair-Minded Majority will go

Equality in terms of appointments on merit alone is as much as the majority ethnic group is likely to want to put up with in the long run.

Affirmative Action means Loss of Prestige

Another danger for the Neubergers is that, as in other areas of our national life where the policy of ‘affirmative action’ is practiced, ethnic and female members of the Judiciary will lose prestige because there will always exist the suspicion that they came by their appointments ahead of white males who have better claims themselves, even if they are said to be ‘equally qualified’.

Institutionalised Anti-White Male Bias

And that suspicion of bias will not be without foundation because contrary to what Neuberger asserts, no two candidates are ever going to be identically qualified academically, by experience or by character .

Further, the structural bias which demands that when there are two ‘equal’ candidates, the ethnic or female candidate will be chosen, will in practice undoubtedly be compounded by an enhanced fear of accusations that ethnic / sex bias is being shown if white males are selected. This will result in a double bias against non-ethnic males. (Incidentally, when both candidates are female presumably the ethnic female will be chosen ahead of a white female as scoring more points on the PC scale of ‘oppression’).

The False Premise of Equality of Ability and other Characteristics

If Neuberger’s proposal and the Legislation he refers to has any claim to fairness it must be that it is based on the actual equality of ability and inclination of all. But the idea that minorities and women are equal in every relevant respect to white males and should be more fully represented in the judiciary, ideally in proportion to their numbers is as in other areas of life is without foundation.

And because it is, it is the basis of oppression of the more able white males who are then excluded from their just rewards. Neuberger’ s own family history ought tell him that while family culture undoubtedly plays a part, ability is largely hereditary.

Neuberger’s own Family History is an Indication of Inherited ability

Wikipedia tells us that he was ‘born on 10 January 1948, the son of Professor Albert Neuberger,^[2] Professor of Chemical Pathology at St Mary's Hospital, University of London, and his wife, Lilian. His uncle was the noted rabbi, Herman N. Neuberger. All three of his brothers are now professors: James is Professor of Medicine at the University of Birmingham, Michael is Professor of Molecular Immunology at the University of Cambridge, while Anthony is Professor in Finance at Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.^[3]’

It’s not just Individuals who inherit Ability, it is Ethnicities.

Further, the make –up of the Supreme Court ought to tell Neuberger that it is not just himself and his siblings who are the beneficiaries of inherited ability. It is the Jews as an ethnic group, as with other ethnic groups. The high proportion of Jews in the upper reaches of the British Judiciary matches their presence in the other professions and is entirely in line with what we would expect from what we know of their high level of average intelligence, which is in the range 107.7- 113 (native British 100). (Richard Lynn, The Global Bell Curve pp 94, 95. Washington Summit 2008).

The Average Woman is not as Intelligent as the average Man.

Further, Wikinews tells us. ‘In a study accepted for publication by the British Journal of Psychology, Dr. Paul Irwing (Manchester Business School, Senior Lecturer in Organizational Psychology) and Prof. Richard Lynn (University of Ulster, Professor Emeritus) conclude that men are on average five points ahead on IQ tests. The study also found that men outnumbered women in increasing numbers as intelligence levels rise. There were twice as many with IQ scores of 125, a level typical for people with first-class degrees. When scores rose to 155, a level associated with genius, there were 5.5 men for every woman.

Since women are not as intelligent as men, especially at the higher levels, have a natural role in bearing and raising babies and because of this natural function have emotional abilities and needs and therefore attitudes to work etc that differ from those of men, the assumption that they should be present in the same proportion as men at the higher reaches of the professions is ludicrous and the product of mere ideology rather than the plainly observable facts of life which that ideology tries to-dismiss.

The Ethnic Origins of the Judges of the Supreme Court

Lord Phillips

President of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, KG

Jewish

Lord Hope

Deputy President of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Hope of Craighead, KT

Scottish . Hope seems solidly Scottish

Lord Walker

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe

English. Walker went to Downside School, a Catholic Indpendent School

Lady Hale

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Baroness Hale of Richmond

Hale’s provenance is not certain because there are few readily available clues on this point. She went to a Christian school, but her name, Hale, appears on a list of possibly Jewish surnames.

She looks like a typical Jewish mother. Her second husband Julian Farrand has a name which can be thoroughly Jewish and has very Jewish looks. Further, the Farrands have strong Jewish associations. For example, we learn that they attended ‘a reception in honour of Dorit Beinisch, president of the Supreme Court of Israel, and the other Israeli judges and academics who were in London as guests of their British counterparts. The reception, hosted by the Jewish Lord and Lady Pannick, was held at the House of Lords. In his address Lord Pannick joked that with six Israeli judges in the room there would be at least seven opinions. Baroness Hale said: “We learn so much from these exchanges.”

Lord Brown

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood

Jewish. Brown is the son of Denis Baer Brown and Edna Elizabeth Abrahams.

Lord Mance

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Mance

English . But 'Mance' can be Jewish. His first name is Jonathan, favoured by Jews. He was introduced to the House of Lords between two Jews, Lord Hoffman and Lord Brown (See above). His wife’s father was a partner in a firm of solicitors founded by the Jewish Abel Morrall.

Lord Kerr

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore

Ulsterman. Kerr is an Ulsterman. Most likely Catholic (He went to a Catholic school in Northern Ireland).

Lord Clarke

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony

English . There is not much information on Clarke, but there is no reason to think otherwise. He has a very English name and face.

Lord Dyson

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Honourable Lord Dyson

Jewish . Dyson stepped into the vacancy left by Neuberger, himself a Jew of course, when the latter became Master of the Rolls. Dyson was a chairman of the British Friends of the Hebrew University's legal group.

Lord Wilson

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon. Lord Wilson of Culworth

English – apparently. Not much information on ethnicity available. Again, he has an English / Scottish name and a very British face.

Jonathan Sumption

Newly appointed Justice of The Supreme Court

English (probably). Sumption is an old English name but can be Jewish. It has been suggested that it is a variant of the given name "Samson," from the Hebrew "Shimson", a diminutive of "shemesh". The first name Jonathan is obviously favoured by Jews. However as a Historian Sumption wrote extensively on Christianity in the Middle Ages although this does have relevance to Jewry.

So at least three of the 11 present members of the highest court in the land ie 27% (more or less) and possibly others are Jewish. Given that the present population of Jews in the UK is about 290,000 ie 0.5% of the whole , this disproportion is quite extraordinary. If Neuberger is after proper ethnic proportionate representation in the Judiciary, there should be no Jews in the Supreme Court , or in other high positions – ever. For surely ‘equal treatment’ as claimed by Neuberger means that, not just ‘under representation’ but ‘ over representation’ should be rectified Or does Neuberger have a strictly one-way process in mind?

The fact that Jews, a tiny minority in the country, are in such numbers in the upper reaches of the Judiciary as in other areas of life in Britain is a proof that that there is no barrier to ethnics of ability. The artificial attempt to increase their representation and that of females by what amounts to affirmative action is a gross oppression of white males. It will not be tolerated in the long run.

(Note: This article assumes that the Judiciary including Neuberger subscribes to the formula in Locabail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd and another [2000] QB 451

There, a specially convened Court of Appeal bench stated that:

“We cannot … conceive of circumstances in which an objection [of apparent judicial bias] could be soundly based on the religion, ethnic or national origin, gender, age, class, means or sexual orientation of the judge.”

The bench was emphatic that a judge’s particular religious convictions or cultural background or associations would not and should not be thought to influence his or her decisions on matters of law’

Your writer regards this statement as a pious fiction. But that is a subject for another article).

Turkey: The Sleeping Giant Of Islam

2011-11-18T19:10:00.000Z

Turkey: The Sleeping Giant Of Islam

fromworldaffairs journal.org

Today is a turning point in history. Nothing will ever be the same again.” So said Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan shortly after nine Turks aboard a Turkish ship died in a May 2010 clash with Israelis. The ship had challenged Israel’s embargo on terror-related goods bound for Gaza. Some observers said that the prime minister shook visibly as he spoke that day.

Erdogan was indeed marking a historic turning point. But not in Turkish-Israeli relations. Rather, he should have been seen—and in fact has been seen throughout the Middle East—as signaling a much broader and more ambitious regional agenda for Turkey, one that will impact its relations with Iran. And to the degree that this agenda succeeds, Erdogan’s words will be seen as prophetic: nothing hereafter will be the same.

Among Turks there seems little doubt that the Erdogan government was complicit in the “flotilla affair,” and that the prime minister looked forward to a confrontation that, one way or another, would show him dramatically standing against Israel. Under his leadership, Turkey’s once firm relations with Israel had already decayed. The Turkish radicals on board the ship heading toward Gaza were not surprised when an Israeli ship interdicted them; violence seems to have been in their plans. Investigations are under way. But this is a region resistant to the niceties of depositions; it sees a higher truth in this affair.

The Middle East has known for some time of Erdogan’s determination to change the nature of his country’s strategic vision. Under his tightening leadership, Turkey is distancing itself from a century of Western orientation and half a century of Western alliances. It pursues a patient and careful course toward a leading, or even dominant, role in the greater Gulf region, and perhaps in the universe of Muslim-majority countries more generally.

No explicit declaration marked this change, for none was wise or needed. Erdogan still calls Turkey a bridge to the Muslim world and tells Westerners that he will be an honest broker between them and it. But the Muslim world understands very well that Turkey has tilted toward the East. Until recently, Erdogan had quietly pursued this shift in three main ways: positioning Turkey to benefit from the decline of the Arab states whose leadership of the region has dramatically deteriorated in the past decade; reaching out to Iran, the most openly aggressive claimant for regional leadership and standard bearer for hostility toward the West; and slowly redefining Turkey’s domestic priorities and politics. Few expected the EU to embrace Turkish membership, but Erdogan adroitly used the EU rejection to undermine Ataturk’s Westernizing legacy. There is a certain artistry, if not originality, in plotting behind the brim of Ataturk’s Western ideals to favor the headscarf.

There have, of course, been less subtle signs of the shift eastward. In 2003, Turkey barred the passage of US troops into Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. In 2005, Erdogan honored Iran’s newly elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the halls of Istanbul, despite Ahmadinejad’s calls for genocide. And in 2006, Erdogan embraced Hamas after its victory in Palestinian elections, and then Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, despite his indictment for war crimes in Darfur. Even before the flotilla sailed for Gaza, Erdogan’s criticism of Israel had already grown shrill. But the change in Turkey’s posture toward Israel has in large part been a tool to advance the country’s reorientation, rather than in any sense its cause.

Erdogan’s comments following the flotilla affair marked a new stage in his quest rather than a change in his goals. He has declared Turkey’s intent to step to the fore as a leader of angry, threatening, anti-Western elements that seek to control the Islamic world. “Turkey’s hostility,” Erdogan pointedly proclaimed in his “turning point” speech, “is as strong as its friendship is valuable.” It was an advertisement for Middle Eastern consumers: we will be the enemy of your enemies, a shelter to our friends.

In the Muslim realm, radical and jihadi precincts included, Erdogan’s message was understood and applauded. Arab publics cheered Turkey as a new leader of hostility against Israel. The deputy head of al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, taking for granted Turkey’s role as chief instigator of the flotilla, urged the heirs of the Ottomans toward even more forceful action against Israel—advice he has repeated since. Zawahiri recalled with praise centuries of “Turkish” rule of the Muslim world.

Al-Qaeda’s endorsement confirms Erdogan’s push to be seen not merely as a leader of the Muslim world, but the leader. While he had previously played merely a supportive role to Iran, with the flotilla affair Erdogan pressed Turkey’s case. One of the many subtle implications of his “turning point” remark is that Turkey and Iran are now rivals, as well as collaborators in the drive to create an internationally more aggressive Middle East. It is unlikely that Ahmadinejad missed this nuance.

This development should not be entirely surprising. Once Erdogan and his party chose to redefine Turkish identity in a more Islamic, and perhaps Islamist, way, and once Turkey set its eyes east and south toward the ancient Muslim heartlands, a rivalry with Iran was likely.

Iran’s regional ambitions are hardwired into the theocratic regime both by its revolutionary doctrine and the limited legitimacy of its rulers. This is especially true now as different factions of the mullahs’ ruling elite compete for ownership of the “revolution.” As the Arab states’ power and influence in the region has declined, Iran has sought, with some success, to take their place. These ambitions have been advanced in the short term by the removal of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein and by the erratic recovery in Iraq and continuing conflict in Afghanistan, but far more by Iran’s unchecked pursuit of nuclear weapons. Iran draws, too, upon the attraction of its enormous proven reserves in natural gas and oil (second and third largest, respectively, in the world). But the mullahs’ regional ambitions wash up against Iran’s ancient rival, Turkey.

In the form of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey for centuries led the greater Middle East. Today its population and economy are slightly larger than Iran’s, and its economy and conventional military are stronger. Despite limits in its democratic processes, Turkey’s government enjoys substantially more stability and legitimacy at home and abroad than Iran’s does. In addition, the Iranian political elite must deal with a traditional “quietist” school of Shiite Islam, now prospering in neighboring Iraq, that scorns theocratic rule. By contrast, as a Sunni country, Turkey may more readily garner support in a largely Sunni Middle East. Indeed, the country has historically invoked its role as the natural leader of the Sunnis to buy peace at home and fend off pressures from abroad. In Ottoman times, it did so in the aftermath of a losing war in the eighteenth century, and again in the late nineteenth. In that era, Sunnis as far afield as India responded positively to that claim; the recent statements of al-Qaeda’s Zawahiri show that Turkey may again attract such support.

The emergence of a Turkish-Iranian rivalry was somewhat delayed by the political problems Erdogan faced when he took power in 2002 with only a minority of the electorate behind him. Turkey’s longstanding secular political tradition meant that he had to move cautiously and cleverly in pursuing the domestic redefinition of Turkish identity. For Erdogan knew his history: the Turkish military had repeatedly thwarted previous Islamist-oriented parties, including, only a decade earlier, one in which Erdogan was a leading figure. So he pursued, initially, the safe course of leaning more toward Iran, and following its lead, albeit at a distance. Hence the warm reception accorded Ahmadinejad and other friendly gestures.

But Erdogan’s party was reelected in 2007 with an increased plurality and a greater majority in Parliament. Since then, he has further weakened internal opposition. While it will not be easy for him to gain and keep broad Turkish support for his plans, there are signs of his progress so far. He recently rejected with virtually no protest several of the military’s candidates for senior promotions; and civilians, not the military, will draft the new National Security Document—both changes from past patterns. Meanwhile, the opposition press has been systematically muzzled—a dash of tax intimidation, a touch of party-supported competition, a measure of prison for alleged seditious activity. Most recently, the constitutional referendum held in September passed with an unexpectedly large majority. Several of the amendments it approved significantly enhance Erdogan’s power. One of them will allow him to take greater control of the heretofore independent judiciary, which had remained a source of opposition; a second reduces the military’s control of its own criteria for membership, especially its power to exclude soldiers on religious grounds. Moreover, the referendum sets the stage for a complete rewriting of the Constitution, which had already been proposed.

In the meantime, Erdogan’s government is pursuing the prosecution of high-level officers for their role in an alleged coup planned in 2003. There are increasingly credible claims among Turks that this is a fraudulent prosecution, knowingly based on forged documents. This might cause Erdogan some domestic difficulties, but the appearance of ruthless dishonesty may confirm for both supporters and opponents alike the depth of his desire for control.

Having fewer constraints on the bases of his power, the prime minister can act with a freer hand in the foreign sphere. Indeed, the two areas at this point may be mutually reinforcing. Erdogan’s behavior in the flotilla crisis won him massive domestic demonstrations of support as he headed into the referendum campaign and positioned his party for the next general elections in 2011.

It is perhaps only a historical oddity, but still a curious one, that a modern struggle for leadership of the greater Middle East and its ancient Muslim heartlands brings to mind rivalries there five hundred years ago. Turkey and Iran are the diminished heirs of two great Muslim Empires of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Shiite Safavid Empire. The Ottomans’ four-hundred-year rule (1517–1917) of vast, especially Arab, Muslim lands arose amidst its rivalry with the Safavid state, a state founded on the basis of new, radical Shiite teachings. Indeed, the Shiite Safavids claimed a particularly close connection with the divine. Their soldiers believed the Safavid leader a divine incarnation, and they attacked the Ottoman border with millenarian utopian fervor, fomenting Shiite rebellions in Anatolia. The present border between Turkey and Iran roughly tracks the border that emerged from Ottoman-Safavid wars, and this rivalry led to long-lasting changes throughout the region. Before the conflict, the Ottomans were more preeminently a European power with an Anatolian hinterland. Afterward, Ottoman ambitions had expanded, and by a chain of events they had not only defeated the Safavids but found themselves quickly in control of present-day Iraq, Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and North Africa. From that time forward, the Ottomans became the standard bearer of Sunnis and put forward a claim, often accepted, to the ancient and prestigious title of caliph.

The defeated Safavid Empire left its own lasting legacy: the conversion of Iran from a majority Sunni to an uneasy Shiite land. The essentially theocratic Islamic Revolution of 1979 revived radical Shiism and its ambitions, toppled a regional order based on the Shah, and projected power into Syria, Iraq, the Gulf, Lebanon, Central Asia, and more recently the Palestinian community. In time, Shiite-Sunni conflict intensified, infamously in Iraq but also in Lebanon and Pakistan. The political and military struggle between Sunnis and Shiites, Turks and Persians, for preeminence in the ancient Muslim heartlands, especially Iraq, may not determine the Middle East’s future, but its influence has stalked this region’s politics for centuries.

Atop these ancient layers lie more modern sources of rivalry created by the current regional framework of states and their particular characteristics. For example, Turkey remains interested in having an influential role in Azerbaijan. A high-level Turkish delegation recently visited and concluded agreements there. Azeris are Shiites, but they are ethnically Turkish and Turkish speaking and maintain a tense relationship with Iran, which must remain concerned with Turkish-Azeri relations because approximately one-quarter of its population is Azeri and rests uneasily under “Persian rule.”

Iraq, too, presents an arena of competition because of its genuine desire to protect itself from Iranian ambitions, the internal Shiite-Sunni divide, and the Kurdish question, which looms large in Iraqi and Turkish politics, and even in Iran, with its own large Kurdish minority. (Recently there have been notably violent attacks on Iranian officials and soldiers in Iran’s “Kurdistan,” though the provenance of these attacks is not clear.)

Lebanon and Syria present yet another Muslim arena for competition. Lebanon is nearby and riven internally, not least along a Sunni-Shia divide. In the recent past, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s support for Kurdish separatists led to an actively hostile Turkish-Syrian border. Turkey has in the last few years undertaken a rapprochement with Syria. Nevertheless, both Syria and Lebanon have increasingly become satellites of Iran. Turkey must inevitably be concerned about further consolidation of Iranian influence near its borders—for example, through the enhanced power of Hezbollah.

Ahmadinejad’s recent state visit to Lebanon (his first) and the enthusiastic reception he received have real as well as symbolic implications. The trip endorsed, and provided support for, the ever-growing power of Hezbollah but also declared how far the ruling mullahs feel that Iranian writ may run. Iran is in effect claiming an “imperial sphere” that reaches across Turkey’s southern border. Iranian flags lined Lebanese roads and signs declared, “Welcome to the protector of Lebanon.” A Lebanese politician observed that “Lebanon will become an Iranian base on the shores of the Mediterranean.” Moreover, Ahmadinejad made the centerpiece of his visit the declaration of renewed hostility to Israel and the United States, saying, “Our world today stands on the verge of change, a change that is starting from our region. Lebanon is an example . . . for the unwavering resistance to the world’s tyrants and a university for jihad.” Ahmadinejad thus announced his own version of a “turning point” and emphasized, as he has in the past, an abiding goal that the “Zionists be wiped out.” Although his visit served several of his own purposes, including domestic ones, one of its most important initiatives was to renew a claim for the leadership role that Erdogan sought to grab through the flotilla affair.

Conflicting interests can be resolved; history is not destiny. The course of Turkish-Iranian relations and the region remains unknown and subject, in part, to Erdogan’s domestic goals, the agendas of others (including the Iranian drive for nuclear weapons), and the roles the Great Powers play.

In the near term, Erdogan may revert to a more cautious mode. He might be satisfied with “profit taking” after the flotilla affair. (One indication of this is the next installment in the Turkish film series Valley of the Wolves—very popular in Turkey and elsewhere—which will open with a flotilla scene. As a Turkish film critic recently said, the film will thus capitalize on Turkey’s regional popularity. Erdogan will capitalize, too.) He has sent a high-level delegation to Washington to reaffirm Turkish-American ties. This fits his ongoing claim that Turkey has not turned decisively to the Muslim East and remains a “bridge” between the West and Islam—a claim that is no longer easily credible, but which serves his other ends. Erdogan continues to seek more control over domestic Turkish politics—further rewriting the Constitution to enhance his power, curbing Kurdish separatists, and controlling the military with measures like the prosecution of officers for alleged conspiracies. In the long term, Erdogan may find that it will not suffice merely to bring the military under control; he may want to put his imprint on it and incorporate it into his foreign and domestic designs.

Erdogan has reasons to prefer a cautious approach, but history reveals, especially in the region, that it is hard to tame a radical agenda: Others act on their fears or hopes; Erdogan must know that the prestige of being Israel’s greatest enemy exposes him to crises created by others. The consolidation of control by Iran’s most revolutionary elements may permit, or even force, him to adopt a more aggressive policy to stay in the game. Hamas or Hezbollah may act for reasons of their own. Erdogan may find it tricky to limit entanglement without jeopardizing his desired role. In the spring of 1967, Syria sparked an escalation of Arab threats and military preparations that soon swept Egypt and other Arab states into an unwanted Six-Day War for which they were ill prepared. Events may not follow Erdogan’s chosen course or calendar, despite caution or cleverness.

Erdogan may even see some advantage in Iran’s determined drive for nuclear weapons. Assertive heirs of the Ottomans may not welcome Iranian nuclear weapons, but after observing diplomacy between Ahmadinejad and the West, Erdogan may well conclude that only a successful Israeli strike will slow Iran. By joining Brazil to mediate a transparently unacceptable nuclear deal with Iran, Erdogan raises his profile and hedges his bets: If the West falters, or if it succeeds, he has not weakened the Muslim world or exposed Turkey to Iran. In the near term, there are other opportunities for Turkish regional gains: Iran’s nuclear bid has weakened its economy and stirred up opposition among Sunni states; in the wake of an Israeli strike, should one occur, Turkey will raise its public voice in anger, even if among its leaders there is some private relief.

But Turkey’s own nuclear ambitions—and not just Iran’s—loom in Erdogan’s maneuvers. In the shadow of Iran’s headlong rush, Turkey has quietly pursued a nuclear course of its own. In 2006, Erdogan revived the country’s long-delayed plans for nuclear power; in 2007, the Turkish Parliament acted affirmatively; in 2010, Turkey and Russia agreed to build a nuclear plant in Turkey this decade. Nuclear power may or may not make economic sense for earthquake-prone, resource-poor Turkey, given that it straddles major energy transit lines. Nuclear technology presents an entirely separate strategic calculation. The Iranian example shows that nuclear enrichment capabilities are best won quietly, a task for which Erdogan is well suited. But as Turkey seeks a leading and aggressive Muslim identity, loosening Western ties, will Erdogan see Turkey’s safety or prestige ensured by having nuclear weapons only in the hands of Russians, Chinese, Indians, Pakistanis, and Western powers—and likely Iran’s as well?

Today Turkey and Iran pursue their regional ambitions with a watchful eye on the interests of greater outside powers. At the moment, there is a powerful and growing belief in the region that the United States is withdrawing—not only from Iraq, but from any forceful role in the region. This may not properly reflect President Obama’s policy; and even if it did, some may claim it is not possible for years to come. However, there is enough ambiguity, for example, in our policies toward Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel, to inflame our enemies and cause uncertainty among our friends. They know the perversity of this region where persistent efforts may win gains, while lesser efforts likely fail. On the occasion of Ahmadinejad’s Lebanese tour, for instance, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared, “We would hope that no visitor would do anything or say anything that would give cause to greater tension or instability in that country.” Many in the region share that hope, but they will be most interested in what deeds accompany our words.

Looking at Western European states, the Middle East cannot help but see rising domestic Muslim constituencies and declining interest in international efforts that might clash with determined Islamist aims. It also sees Russia, China, and India becoming more assertive, not to mention more willing to bargain for their own ends. This reflects not only these nations’ growing power in the world but also their increasing interest in energy resources, transportation infrastructure, and the heightened regional roles of states closer to them—states like Turkey and Iran.

So the Great Powers offer (or just as importantly, seem to offer) the leaders of Turkey and Iran new pieces in a game long played in the lands that stretch from the Bosphorus to the Straits of Hormuz. For example, the new Turkish national security strategy reportedly will remove Russia from its list of enemies, and Russia and Turkey are focused on pipelines critical to both that would have enormous strategic impact on Europe. Meanwhile, Iran has used Russian and Chinese interests to forestall UN sanctions. Even in earlier days, the Ottomans or Persians time and again allied with Russia to struggle against one another. The region is practiced in such maneuvers.

Turkey and Iran may yet follow anti-Western paths more similar than not. American problems might deepen if Turkey or Iran manipulates outside powers for support. Recently Turkey staged one of its regular “Anatolian Eagle” joint military maneuvers. This time, atypically, American and Israeli forces were absent, replaced by Chinese planes and pilots. The Chinese reached Turkey by flying, with Tehran’s permission, through Iranian airspace.

Dealing with this new configuration of power and ambition calls for a determined policy by America, one that deals realistically with the landscape we face, not the one we wish for. There are prospects for us in this landscape, but diplomacy, however adept, will accomplish little if, correctly or incorrectly, the region doubts our will to follow through.

In the 1930s, Ataturk admonished Turks to free their public life from dysfunctional ways. He warned that the choice was not ideological or aesthetic but pragmatic. “Civilization,” he said, “is a fearful fire which consumes those who ignore it.” And fire spreads—especially when fed by a volatile mix of gas, oil, religion, and ambition.

Petrol Prices Fuel Our Radical British Nationalist Alternative

2011-11-17T15:13:00.002Z

Petrol Prices Fuel Our Radical Alternative

Posted AT BNP IDEAS on Nov 2011

By Mark Pritchard.

With prices at petrol pumps having tripled in twenty years, far above the rate of inflation, and now at record levels, and the Government set to slap another 3p tax on a litre of fuel in January, MPs responded by indulging in a futile debate on fuel prices on Tuesday afternoon.

A debate that may give the public the impression intended, that the politicians care about the increasing suffering this is inflicting on ordinary families and will do something. But which will result in nothing being done. Because the issues around fuel prices are much more fundamental, and will require much more radical action, than fiddling with a penny here and there on fuel duty.

Fuel duty is certainly significant: 58p of the price you pay for every litre goes in duty. Plus another 22.4p a litre on average for petrol and 23.1p for diesel in VAT. Craftily the taxman charges VAT on the rest of the price of the fuel, including duty, so you are paying 20% tax on tax!

The actual cost of the fuel, including refining it so it can go in your car, amounts to only 46.7p a litre on petrol and 52.6p a litre on diesel. This incidentally is pretty constant across the country – the wide variation in prices charged at the pumps is simply opportunistic profiteering by the multinational corporations on whom you and I depend to put fuel in our cars.

Those multinationals do not do at all badly out of it. Profit margins on fuel average 25% after tax, which is a very handsome profit margin as any businessman will tell you. Given that the UK rate on fuel companies’ profits is 62%, it is clear that their profiteering from our forced purchases of petrol and diesel is considerably greater than the 25% they get to pocket.

This is as far as the debate, very largely, has gone.

The AA and RAC on behalf of the hapless motorists bewail high tax rates and the Government, this one and the last, justify these on the basis of needing the money thus raised to reduce the massive level of public debt they have run up. The latter means neither Tories, Labour or LibDems will do anything much about the ever rising prices we pay at the pumps. They cannot afford to.

Public debt and what should be done about it is a separate debate. But in fact it is irrelevant to the real issue. As is arguing about the rate of tax on fuel.

The real problem causing the real pain to us ordinary Britons isn’t that an awful lot of the price we pay for petrol and diesel goes in tax and oil company profits. It always did. The real problem is that that price itself just keeps on rising ever higher, faster than inflation and, most importantly, faster than incomes rise.

Filling up our cars, and distribution companies filling up their trucks and vans, is getting steadily more expensive in real terms. It is this that is the real issue causing the real pain. Both directly at the pumps and indirectly as higher fuel costs feed through via higher distribution costs to put up the price of food and other goods in the shops. It is this that is the real issue.

The root cause of this, the real issue, is that the price of crude oil, the underlying raw material, is rising inexorably. Whilst pump prices go up pretty much in lockstep with the underlying oil price.

We are paying three times what we paid for fuel twenty years ago because the price of crude oil has itself tripled over this period. There have been fluctuations – the Bankers’ Crash of 2008/09 reduced demand for oil globally, the price of crude fell and so, briefly, did the price we paid at the pumps.

Also and as usual the nefarious and parasitic antics of global market speculators have temporarily distorted prices from time to time. But the underlying trend is inexorably up. In the long run, if things go on like this, we are going to be paying ever more – a growing fraction of our incomes, on fuelling our cars, vans and trucks. Whilst ever more of these costs will also put up the price of food, clothing and other necessities.

It is this, the inexorable long term rise in real oil prices, that is the fundamental problem, and the one the MPs’ bickering, shouting, making inane jokes and scoring party points as ever in Parliament assembled most certainly never really considered, let alone addressed.

So we must, especially as we are not burdened by the immediate pressures of Government or Opposition.

Why are oil prices steadily going up? The answer is basic economics: supply and demand. The supply of crude oil is not keeping pace with rising demand worldwide. This must and does drive up prices on the global oil market. Because we are in that global market, that means we get to pay more. And more, and more.

Why is demand rising? Mostly because India and China are massively increasing oil consumption. Partly to run industries dumping their cheap goods in our home markets thanks to the global market economy.

Partly as the profits of that exploitation and undercutting of Western peoples fuels greater consumption and especially car use amongst the exploiting classes in countries like India and China.

Whilst children and poor peasants work long hours for derisory pay in the sweatshops churning out their cheap goods, a growing class of bosses, managers and Capitalists is getting richer and swapping their bicycles for cars. Which need petrol. With economies growing at several percent a year these countries will keep on wanting more and more oil.

In theory, this rise in demand pushes prices up in the short term which in the long term creates more supply, as new suppliers are attracted into the market by the higher prices. In practice, oil is a limited good.

Higher prices do make previously uneconomic sources worth exploiting, but the cost of finding and extracting it steadily rises, so that these new sources do little or nothing to bring down the cost of oil. For example, a barrel of oil costs at most £2 to get out of the Saudi sands. It costs over £40 a barrel to extract from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada.

Matters are made worse by the fact that most of the world’s oil that is cheap to extract is in politically unstable and dangerous places, whose rulers seek to exploit the undeserved power the oil gives them.

The producers’ cartel OPEC has in the past consistently used monopoly power to keep prices artificially high – although now it no longer, interestingly, needs to do so. It has always been outrageous and immoral that British families needing to fuel their cars have been exploited by super-rich Islamic sheikhs who neither made, found, extracted nor used the oil beneath usually uninhabitaed and waste tracts of their domains.

As oil prices rise there is a strong case likely to be made in the short-term for an alliance of Western powers confiscating this undeserved asset and the wealth exacted from it. The more so as the oil states are swept by Islamism and political instability – the Saudi sheikhs are looking shaky indeed these days!

The replacement of bandits driven by greed with fanatics driven by hate in control of the oil supplies on which the West has become dependent would be a disaster demanding and probably getting urgent, and doubtless military, action. At least British soldiers would not die in vain in Arabia defending our country’s short-term energy supply as they do in Afghanistan defending nothing of the least relevance to Britain.

However, secret as the sheikhs keep the size of their stash of remaining Black Gold, it is no secret that it is limited and will sooner or later run out. Sooner, as global demand fuelled by China, India and their ilk, rises inexorably. The same is true of all oil reserves, at some point. Some probably not too distant point, in fact.

Although there is a great deal of crackpot nonsense spoken and written about “Peak Oil” (especially by those who choose to surround themselves with unthreatening cranks!) it is a truism universally acknowledged that the supply of oil is finite – the Earth is essentially a stone in the sky with a molten metal middle rather than a giant floating oil droplet, after all!

Also whilst in theory ever-more difficult and inaccessible oil deposits can be exploited as prices rise, eventually a limit is set by physics, rather than economics.

If it takes more energy to extract the oil than is released when it is burned, it is not worth extracting. And the energy cost of extraction is a physical cost, comprised of effort, not an economic cost denominated in money. Once we have to put in more energy per barrel of oil than we get out of it as fuel, further extraction is unsustainable. The oil has run out.

Long before then, demand rising faster than supply will have forced prices to unaffordable levels at the pumps. In theory, this would cause users to seek more affordable alternatives.

This is the theory behind the “fuel duty escalator” which was meant to control oil consumption by gradually reducing demand in favour of alternatives.

The problem is there aren’t any alternatives today, in practice. Public transport has been privatised and, over much of rural Britain, closed down. The railways, neglected for decades in favour if what Margaret Thatcher once famously called “our great car economy” are now inadequate to cope with demand, overcrowded, and, again, subject to the parasitic removal of corporate profit from their operations, further starving them of resources.

The transport infrastructure is now totally built around motor vehicles. The subservience of both Labour and Tory politics, nationally and locally, to economics in the form of huge corporations’ money has led to the replacement of local small High Street shops in walking distance of most homes with giant out-of-town malls of Tesco superstores etc., only really accessible by car.

The breakdown of community and the feeling of safety on the streets it brings, combined with the rising flood of cars making streets physically dangerous for children, has fuelled the motor-driven daily “school run” in place of children walking or being bussed to school.

The result is that most people have no realistic alternative to the car for personal and family transport. Nor do most businesses have one to using vans and trucks for distribution. The result in turn is that in the British – and other Western – markets demand for petrol/diesel is in economic terms “price inelastic”.

Raising price does not reduce demand, because people have no alternative but simply to pay more. As price rises people are forced to go without less vital goods in order to afford to get to work, school and the shops. Small transport businesses go bust.

But there is no significant move out of cars. Until a break point is suddenly reached – we can only speculate what that is: £5 a litre, £10, £50?—when suddenly most of the public cannot afford to fill their tanks, therefore do not go to work, and the economy and society collapse catastrophically.

That is what will happen eventually unless our rulers stop tinkering with a penny on or off fuel duty here and a VAT rate change there and start addressing the real underlying issue.

We are not the only people to see this: on the day Parliament had its futile safety valve hot air release, Richard Hebditch, of the Campaign for Better Transport, rightly said the “big problem” is that Britons are reliant on their cars and dependent on foreign oil supplies, which are “quite risky oil supplies.”

He went: “What we need to do is take the money from fuel duty and invest it in giving people real alternatives and modernising our transport systems so we aren’t so dependent on foreign and risky oil supplies.”

Mr Hebditch is right. We must go further – in the long run we have to aim for sustainable energy independence. An economy in which we meet all our energy needs from within our own borders and the territory we control.

It would have been easier if the oil we did have in the North Sea had not been sold off by Labour and Tory alike to foreign multinationals, who have flogged it all off for a fast buck. Instead we should have kept it in the hands of our own people, and husbanded it for maximum use, as Norway has done. Now we are importing oil, and gas, again.

As long as we can still afford to do so as we have to pay ever more bidding against the billions of India and China on the global markets.

We don’t need to forever. Oil itself is basically only a means of storing energy and moving it about until it can be used, normally to drive an internal combustion engine.

In terms of energy per unit mass it is very efficient. The main current alternative, electrical batteries, store much less energy per unit mass, which is why electric cars struggle to become established in the market.

When oil gets a lot more expensive or if batteries become a lot more efficient this will change. Especially as batteries can store energy captured from many sources – sun, wind, and water as well as by releasing energy from sunlight captured and stored by plants millions of years ago as with coal and oil.

We should, for example, now be funding massive research on new and better ways of storing energy, better batteries and making oil from coal (which we do still have in abundance). There are lots of other ideas we should be developing now against the day we will need to achieve energy independence.

This is what we as a country should be doing. As a Party, we should be explaining the real cause of dear petrol at the pumps is the fact that we are dependent for supply on a global market in which prices will keep on rising faster than people’s incomes.

We should be arguing the case for a radical alternative based not on 2p off fuel duty but on energy independence. Indeed we should be arguing the case for as much as possible sustainable economic independence in which we not only produce our own fuel and generate our own power but feed and clothe our own people from our own territory. Autarky rather than the global market.

At this point some more conservative with a small “c” – but no less patriotic and nationally-minded-Nationalists will argue that such radicalism will scare the horses and lose us votes.

They would and do argue we should not openly advocate a radical alternative to the global market Capitalist system – even though they must privately admit that if we came to power tomorrow it would expel us in a wave of sanctions etc. whether we wanted to leave or not.

Precipitating a massive economic crisis and very probably the collapse of our Government, the more so if we had not suggested any such break with globalism beforehand. They argue that economic autarky is politically damaging and should be dropped as a policy. We will never win power on such a platform, they fear.

In the short term they are right. But in the short term we are not going to be anywhere near power anyway. We will not win power on any platform for now.

In the short term the present System mostly sort of works and most of the public are mostly sort of happy with it. And therefore mostly sort of happy with the Parties that run it.

There may be ever more lumps in the bunk mattress, the cabins may be cleaned less frequently and well, and dinner may be worse and worse cooked. There may even be the odd fly in the soup. But the passengers are not anxious to leave the luxury liner for the lifeboats, and are happy to trust the Captain who says the ship is unsinkable rather than the weatherbeaten and disreputable old matelot who says they should be looking instead to the condition of the lifeboats. Until the iceberg hits…

Then they will remember – and in that hour heed and turn to – the bloke who knew about the lifeboats. Rather than the more civic-minded seaman who shied from mentioning icebergs and lifeboats because it would scare the passengers, and instead just moaned about the failings of the Captain and the First Mate.

The endless long term rise is the price of petrol isn’t a dirty cabin or a fly in the soup of the system’s liner. It is one of a number of approaching icebergs, a dial heading inexorably toward the red line beyond which something will fail catastrophically.

There are others – food prices, the ethnic/demographic issues around immigration and relative birth rates, the increasing instability of the global economic system, manifest in the Bankers’ Slump and now the Sovereign Debt/Eurozone Crisis, and so on.

In all such cases we need to sound the alarm and advance a radical nationalist alternative. We need to let it be known we will be offering a lifeboat, not another bucket to bail, when the ship starts to sink.

Not a lifeboat the passengers need yet. For now they simply need to see a sensible locally-based alternative able to help them with day to day issues. We have shown we can offer that, win significant local and even European representation doing so, and build a credible small national party.

We can do that again. In that task our view on global markets and autarky should be no significant hindrance, provided we are careful to avoid crankiness.

We should be saying, sotto voce to some extent in public for the present but saying nevertheless, especially to our own members, that we think the current global market economy is unstable and unsustainable in the fact of growing global pressures of rising population and economic activity pressing against limited planetary resources – a view in which we are much less alone, and in which we have more and sometimes surprising allies, than some may think – and that we do have alternatives ready for the aftermath of its collapse when they will be needed. And wanted, desperately.

For they will be needed and wanted. The global market alternative is to fight harder and harder for less and less in a world of more and more people. Not just in energy. We cannot be sure when we will reach Peak Oil. But sometime this century we will reach Peak People.

When the global population reaches and then exceeds the total available planetary resources of oil and other energy. And, more basically food and water.

Like germs in a bottle of sour milk, humans have fed and fed and fed and bred and bred and bred until the food and resources are gone. Then, as with the bacteria in the bottle, our numbers will die back and crash catastrophically.

Our mission is to ensure as many of our people as possible come through that dieback alive, and our nation is still afloat at the end of the great civilization-shattering historical storm that will happen when the System’s ship founders.

Then, and only then, will our fellow passengers look to see and flock to those who can offer them a lifeboat. Then will come our hour of destiny.

We must not hide the fact that we have a lifeboat just because at the moment it upsets passengers who don’t see, as we do, that we are on a sinking ship. Far from never coming to power on a radical platform, we will only come to power on a radical platform. When desperate times demand the desperate measures we and we alone offer.

Asian spat in face of poppies girl Beth

2011-11-17T11:04:00.000Z

Asian spat in face of poppies girl Beth

Maybe this will wake some sheeple up and encourage them to vote for a British Nationalist Party?

The Sun reports - A YOUNG yob spat in a girl Army cadet's face as she sold Remembrance Day poppies in a city shopping centre, it was revealed yesterday.

One of the three Asian hoodies — all said to be aged about 12 — took a poppy from a box held by Bethany Holmes and spat on it before spitting into her face three times.

In a separate incident, two teenage girl Army Cadets faced a barrage of verbal abuse for selling poppies — because they were Asian.

Others sellers in Bradford, West Yorks, were threatened and attacked.

Poppy Appeal organiser Barbara Allsopp said: "I feel sorry for the cadets. These yobs should hang their heads in shame."

Bethany's mum, Christine, added: "I want to make them apologise. They are disgusting, the lowest of the low."

Police in the city were studying CCTV in a bid to nail the yobs.

Chris Bryant MP - lABOUR Pervert and Politician of the Year

2011-11-16T20:03:00.000Z

Chris Bryant MP - Pervert and Politician of the Year

Written by Green Arrow

November 2011

I was reading over on some news site or other, that the homosexual Member of Parliament for Rhonda, Chris Bryant had been voted Politican of the Year by the nasty and dangerous homosexual lobby group Stonewall.

It was at their sixth annual awards - where they pat individuals who have made a positive impact on the lives of homosexuals, on the back or maybe even on the bottom.

Their citation reads: "Politician of the Year - Chris Bryant MP. Chris Bryant has been garlanded with plaudits from across the political spectrum for his tenacious campaign against News International phone hacking. The judges were impressed with 'the resolve and tenacity' that Chris has demonstrated, as an equality advocate, in the last decade."

Now I am not a big fan of homosexuals but providing they do not start "fisting" and "rimming" each other in public and homosexuality is not promoted in schools as being "normal", they can do what they like in the privacy of their own closets.

However, that does not stop me being curious as to how their minds work - clearly not in the same way as mine or most normal decent people I suspect.

Remember this photograph and story about Chris Bryant? Can someone tell me just how this creatures behaviour is anything other than obnoxious and reduces the reputation of the Houses of Parliament even further - if that is possible.

Bryant, as to be expected from a creature that poses in soiled underpants on the internet soliciting for sex, is a former London Manager of Common Purpose - an organisation that according to BNP Ideas is just a harmless charity. Bloody intellectuals - thick as planks the lot of them.

How posing on the Internet in grubby pants makes for a positive contribution to the homosexual cause, I am not sure. Neither am I sure that Bryants involvement in the disgusting pigs in the trough scandal of MP's fiddling their expenses should have qualified him as making a positive contribution to anything. Then again, homosexuals clearly have different values to most normal people and so let them get on with their irrelevant awards.

Oh there was one laugh at the awards. The obese mountain of lard, Vanessa Feltz, who was voted Journalist of the Year at the awards, said "If I get another caller saying "It's Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve" I will shoot myself in the heart". If anyone has gigantoes number can they please give her a call on my behalf and say those magic words that would cause her to go and make all decent people happy.

You may be interested in this other article concerning Chris Bryant - Politician of the Year.

Chris Bryant is not a panto dame - he is a pervert.

White teenage mother stabbed to death by Asian Cowards

2011-11-16T18:07:00.001Z

White teenage mother stabbed to death and dumped in canal 'after her married Asian lover rejected her child'

Laura Wilson, 17, killed three days after she revealed to the families of Ishaq Hussain, 22, and Ashtiaq Asghar, 18, that she had had affairs with both men
Asghar 'sent text to Hussain day before she died which read: "I'm gonna send that kaffir bitch straight to hell" '
No Stephen Lawrence enquiry likely here I guess!
Read the Daily Mails version of this awful Anti British Anti White racist murder here

Scottish National Party threatens England

2011-11-15T19:23:00.000Z

Scottish National Party threatens England

Written by Gary Raikes:
Britain First Scotland

November 2011

Alex Salmond, the leader of the Scottish National Party and First Minister for Scotland, speaking in Qatar, was at his belligerent best recently, arrogantly saying that England’s lights would be dependent on Scotland’s renewable energy in the future.

It is a complete fallacy to believe that England, our largest customer by far, would be dependant on Scotland for any product or service. As for North Sea oil being an answer to all our problems, Salmond omits to tell the truth that it is thanks to the Barnett formula that Scotland gets the same amount raised in oil tax back to spend in Scotland.

The truth of renewable energy is also glossed over as a major bank warned this week that electricity bills will more than double under Salmonds plan to build an independent Scotland on green power.

Citigroup claimed bills would soar by an average of £875 per household if the country goes it alone and pursues SNP plans to invest billions in wave and wind power.

A select few are lining their pockets as ordinary Scots face crippling fuel bills. The big power companies continue to rake it in posting profits that have climbed to billions every single year.

The main driver for this is the ROCs (Renewable Obligation Certificates) and feed-in tariffs that throw money at power companies and landowners.

This is the reason that Scottish landowners are keen to have their farms and estates industrialised by wind farms.

Sir Alastair Gordon-Cumming will earn £435,000 annually from 29 giant turbines on his Altyre estate while The Duke of Roxburghe will net £720,000 a year from his 48 400ft high turbines at Fallago Rig in the beautiful Lammermuir Hills.

In an attempt to conceal yet more truth from the people the SNP Government refused a Freedom of Information request to release its legal advice on an independent Scotland’s position with the EU, giving the reason that the answer would “prejudice substantially” the SNP administrations conduct and it would be “contrary to the public interest”.

The fact is that there is increasing academic and legal reasons that an independent Scotland would have to apply to join the EU. Accession states must accept all aspects of the EU. Not only would Scotland have to adopt the Euro, we would lose all the UK’s opt-outs thus finding ourselves in the same basket-case situation of Greece.

The SNP continue to show they are not nationalists who care about the ordinary people but just like the other parties spend time courting bankers, big business and rich landowners.

Mr Salmond’s disrespectful attitude to Great Britain, the United Kingdom and England in particular is frankly embarrassing.

Footnote by The Green Arrow

Gary Raikes is the Scottish Coordinator of Britain First, so if you live in Scotland and care about Scotland and wish to know more, then you can find his contact details here, along with an interesting bit of news about a new Britain First Group being set up in Fife.

LIBYA - THE MEDIAS LIE'S AND BANKERS AGENDA

2011-11-13T21:22:00.002Z

LIBYA- THE MEDIA LIES AND THE BANKERS AGENDA

Many of you should seek the truth and not just accept what the bankers run media tells you , just watch to see what really went on in Libya!

Our British jobs and industry need protection

2011-11-13T20:57:00.001Z

Our jobs and industry need protection

Written by BNP Ideas
font size
E-mail

28th October 2011: Yesterday lunchtime, just before leaving the European Parliament in Strasbourg, Andrew Brons had hoped to make this contribution under the 'Catch the Eye' procedure to a debate on the conclusions of the European Council held the previous Sunday.
Disappointingly, he wasn't called to speak.
Andrew would have said:
"I refer to the report on Sunday's meeting (which was the agenda item).
The laudability of a stated aim does not mean that the chosen means are either appropriate or likely to be successful.
Merely to say that you are in favour of sustainable and job-creating growth should not be enough to put you on the side of the angels.
The Single Market might be beneficial to large businesses always seeking cheaper factors of production but do not presume that everybody is a winner and that there are no losers.
The EU promising to reduce the overall regulatory burden is like a recidivist criminal promising to do something about crime. He will do something!
Tucked away in paragraph 4 is a eulogy of the Euro Plus Pact. Under the headline Competitivenes, in the Pact, is the advocacy of abolition of wage indexation. Real wage cuts, we are told, will increase competitiveness - this is the price we pay for embracing Globalism. European countries do not need international trade liberalisation; they need protection for their industries and their jobs."

mmigration - now it’s the British elderly who are expected to pay the price!

2011-11-12T18:07:00.000Z

Immigration - now it’s the elderly who are expected to pay the price!

Written by Richard Barnbrook

November 2011

A shock report issued by the newly formed, left-wing pressure group, Intergenerational Foundation, is out to make war on one of society’s softest targets: the elderly.

In their unashamedly ageist attack on senior citizens, whom they consider to be fair game, the Foundation, launched by Labour’s Tessa Jowell, has issued a report that is blatantly draconian and hostile to the interests and well-being of the elderly - all in the name of ’fairness’, of course. The proposal is that because of the current housing shortage, older people should be taxed out of their family homes in order to make room for younger families.

On the surface this might seem to be a sensible suggestion, but when seen in the light of the fact of the net figure of over a quarter of a million immigrants entering the country last year, the implications become far more sinister.

As I have been saying for a long time, large numbers of newcomers need to be both serviced and accommodated somewhere - because it’s a fact of life that you can’t squeeze a quart into a pint pot. (And I make no apologies for using imperial measurement!) So, where shall we put them all? Where indeed! According to the Intergenerational Foundation, the answer’s quite simple - turf out all those lonely oldies living in three bedroom houses and push them into accommodation that is ‘more suited to their needs,’ to make way for younger families! So much for the age-old saying ‘an Englishman’s home is his castle’!

When, oh when will the British public wake up? How much longer will they be prepared to sit back and watch their birthright being stolen before their eyes? Our national sovereignty has been hijacked by Brussels so that we can’t even make our own laws any more. Our politicians ignore our wishes, even though we elected them to represent our interests. Our children are being sold short in the education system, health tourists from abroad exploit our already over-stretched NHS, and our own people can’t get jobs, which are being given to foreign nationals. And now, senior members of society, who deserve respect and the dignity of some space in their declining years, having worked all their lives to earn it, are blatantly being told to move over because they are in the way! Even to make such a pointed and offensive suggestion is indicative of how far some politicians are prepared to go in this full-scale attack on the interests of the people of this country.

The only comfort that I can draw from this disgusting and shameful attack on the elderly is the fact that Tessa Jowell herself is clearly no spring-chicken! In the not too distant future, she may live to rue the day that she affiliated herself with such a barbarous bunch of ageist bigots!