<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>House Detective: Making the Most of Home Inspection</title>
	
	<link>http://www.housedetective.com</link>
	<description>Featuring America's Home Inspector: Nationally Syndicated Columnist, Barry Stone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/HouseDetective" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>HouseDetective</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>For Sale By Owner vs. Loyalty to Agent</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HouseDetective/~3/0BwmQ662ZMY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/11/07/for-sale-by-owner-vs-loyalty-to-agent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housedetective.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House Detective:  by Barry Stone, Certified Home Inspector</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> Our Realtor has been showing us listings for several weeks. But last week, we found a for-sale-by-owner property and made an offer to the owner without calling our agent. Since our Realtor spent so much time trying to find a house for us, are we obligated to involve him in this purchase?  Rob</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Rob:</strong> This type of situation is a sore spot with many real estate professionals. Your Realtor devoted many hours to your search for a home and now will receive nothing for those efforts. Unless you have a contract with him, you are under no obligation. However, most agents feel that the time and effort they spend showing property to a prospective client warrants some loyalty.</p>
<p>The seller in this case is clearly under no obligation to pay a real estate commission, nor is it likely that he would be willing to pay one. So there&#8217;s probably no way to involve your Realtor in the current transaction.</p>
<p>The most fair and respectful way to have handled this situation would have been to inform your Realtor of your interest in the property, rather than contacting the seller directly. The Realtor could then have called the seller and said, &#8220;I have clients who are interested in your home. Would you be willing to pay a reduced commission if I bring you an offer?&#8221; At that point, the seller could have accepted or declined. If he had declined, you would have been free to make your own offer, without misgivings between you and your agent.</p>
<p>At this point, you can choose whether or not to inform your Realtor of the decision you have made. Expressing your concern and extending your apologies would probably be more respectful than to say nothing at all.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/11/07/for-sale-by-owner-vs-loyalty-to-agent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/11/07/for-sale-by-owner-vs-loyalty-to-agent/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Seller Disputes Condition of Fireplace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HouseDetective/~3/R1UbZZutqB4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/11/03/seller-disputes-condition-of-fireplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[As is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fireplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housedetective.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House Detective:  by Barry Stone, Certified Home Inspector</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> I&#8217;m having trouble with the seller of the home I am buying. When I first looked at the house, he said the fireplace was in good working order. But my home inspector says there are loose bricks and mortar in the firebox. Now the seller says he never used the fireplace but was told when he bought the house that it worked. When I asked him to fix the loose masonry, he refused because the sale is not contingent on the findings of the home inspector. And he still insists that the fireplace is in working order, even though the home inspector disagrees. Does the seller have to pay to fix the fireplace? And if not, can I get out of the contract even though there wasn&#8217;t a contingency on passing inspection?  Kim</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Kim:</strong> If the purchase contract is not contingent on the findings of the home inspection, then the seller is not required to make repairs, and the condition of the fireplace does not provide an option to cancel the purchase. The seller, however, should stop insisting that the fireplace is in working condition. If he has never used it, and if the bricks and mortar are loose, he obviously has no basis for that claim.</p>
<p>Your choice, then, is to decide if the cost of chimney repair overrides the value of the home. If the property is acceptable to you in all other respects, does a fireplace repair of several hundred or even a few thousand dollars offset its desirability. If so, you may have to forfeit your deposit. Otherwise, you should proceed with the purchase and eventually pay to have the fireplace repaired. But before you decide, hire a fireplace specialist to provide a detailed evaluation, as well as a written bid for necessary repairs.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/11/03/seller-disputes-condition-of-fireplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/11/03/seller-disputes-condition-of-fireplace/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Inspector’s Halloween</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HouseDetective/~3/aylxTg_gcnM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/10/29/home-inspectors-halloween/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housedetective.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House Detective:  by Barry Stone, Certified Home Inspector</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> You never do columns that recognize holidays. Even at Christmas time and the 4th of July, your articles are always about property defects, real estate disclosure, and home inspections. Now that Halloween is here, how about a spooky house story; something in keeping with the season. Surely you&#8217;ve inspected a few creaky old houses. How about it?  Bram</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Bram:</strong> Home inspections tend to be business-as-usual events: checking the foundations, roofing, plumbing, electrical wiring, etc. But there was one inspection that I recall with dread and discomfort; an inspection where property defects ceased to be of concern, where routine was over-shadowed by fear, where disclosures were eclipsed by a frenzied struggle to flee the premises. And it just so happened that this inspection occurred on the eve of Halloween.</p>
<p>The house was an old, neglected, two-story Victorian, with leaning fences, tangled vegetation, and dense vines engulfing the walls, windows, and roof. The property, in escrow as a probate sale, had been the subject of headlines when the owner had been found hanging from the rafters of the foyer. The police investigation had not determined whether death was from suicide or foul play, and the body&#8217;s subsequent disappearance from the local mortuary had unsettled the community.</p>
<p>The buyers and agent were unable to attend the inspection, but the agent had left a key under the mat. Pressing open the massive door, I entered slowly and commenced what I had hoped would be a routine inspection. But then, beneath the lofty ceiling of the darkened interior, I beheld the noosed rope, still attached to a high, dusty beam. A foul odor of decay permeated the stagnant air, and I recalled reading that the man had spent many days at the end of that rope before the neighbors had found him. The prospect of working alone in those dim, silent rooms unsettled me, and my foremost thought was to complete the job and get out of that ominous place.</p>
<p>A steep stairway descended to the basement, where I proceeded to inspect the old stone foundations, but the sounds of creaking timbers echoed throughout the building, disrupting my attention. And then there seemed to be a different sound, somewhere upstairs. At first, it blended with the incessant creaking of the structure, but the difference soon became apparent. This was not the sound of timbers. It was the slow but steady motion of footsteps. Someone was in the house. Hoping that it was the real estate agent, I called out, &#8220;Hello, is someone upstairs?&#8221; No one answered, but the footsteps continued down the hallway and stopped at the dark entrance to the basement staircase. I called again, &#8220;Hello, who&#8217;s there?&#8221; Again, no answer. Then, a shadow appeared on the stairs and moved slowly, silently downward.</p>
<p>The dark, disfigured form gradually took shape, his head laid awkwardly against his left shoulder. Yet my attention was drawn from this to some shadowy, indistinct object that dangled from his left hand. As he reached the basement floor, a putrid foulness filled the room, so that breathing became difficult and repugnant. Gripped with horror and disbelief, I was unable to move. But then, the eyes of that disjointed head found me, the lips formed a sardonic grin, dripping with thick gray saliva, and my mobility was wakened by a wave of terror. Clawing my way up the basement wall, I squeezed into the narrow space between the ground and the floor framing, seeking desperately for any way of escape. But the advancing form appeared atop the foundation wall and steadily pursued me into that dark crawlspace.</p>
<p>Trapped in a corner where the foundation walls joined, I realized with desperate finality that I could flee no further. Somewhere is the nearby darkness, I could hear that half dead form crawling toward me. Clutching at my flashlight, I was startled at the impending nearness of his face: the glare of cold eyes, the glint of gray teeth, the viscous fluid that dripped from grimacing lips &#8212; and that mysterious object gripped in his left hand.</p>
<p>Terror pounded in my chest as I faced those final, hopeless, remaining seconds. The feet between us became inches. His right hand gripped my ankle as he drew forward. Then his left hand extended the old gunny sack that he held, and the acrid smell of cold breath filled my face, as he cried, &#8220;Trick or treat!!&#8221;</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/10/29/home-inspectors-halloween/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/10/29/home-inspectors-halloween/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Buyer Takes Issue With Seller’s Disclosure Statement</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HouseDetective/~3/7tnqPw4_ZyI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/10/15/buyer-takes-issue-with-sellers-disclosure-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housedetective.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>The House Detective:  by Barry Stone, Certified Home Inspector</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> </em> I recently made a purchase offer on a house. The seller&#8217;s disclosure statement listed no defects, but the offer was contingent on a clean home inspection report. So I hired a home inspector and also ordered an appraisal for a total cost of $700. When I read the inspection report, I couldn&#8217;t believe the number of major issues that needed attention, from standing water under the building to rotted wood on the roof. Because of this, I&#8217;ve decided not to buy the house. Since the seller&#8217;s disclosure statement listed no defect, is he liable for the money I spent on the inspection and appraisal?  Dan</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Dan:</strong> Unless you can prove that the seller concealed known defects in the disclosure statement, he is not responsible to reimburse your costs. The purchase contract was contingent on your acceptance of the home inspection report. Therefore, your only options are to cancel the transaction or renegotiate the contract.</p>
<p>Reliance on seller disclosure statements is usually disappointing. In most cases, disclosure statements are worth less than the squares of toilet tissue they might have been printed on. A home inspection report, if properly prepared by a qualified professional, will always reveal more than a disclosure statement.</p>
<p>In most cases, sellers are simply unaware of defects in their homes, although there are instances where sellers deliberately conceal known defects. The seller in your case may never have looked under the building and may have been totally unaware of the drainage problem. Likewise, he probably never walked on the roof or crawled through the attic, and therefore had no idea that the wood was rotted.</p>
<p>It is unfortunate that you hired an appraiser before you reviewed the home inspection report. The appraisal should have been done after you considered the physical condition of the property. That would have limited your nonrefundable expenses.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> </em>When we bought our home, the sellers prevented our home inspector from inspecting the attic. They simply told him that there was no access, and he merely confirmed this in his inspection report. We later discovered that the access was on the wall of the master closet, behind some clothes. Our concern now is whether we have asbestos insulation in our attic. If so, are the sellers liable for asbestos removal?  Kim</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Kim:</strong> The sellers must have known about the access panel in the closet, although they may not have realized it was the entry to the attic. On the other hand, there may have been some attic issues that they wanted to hide. The answers to these questions may never be known. The main focus now is to inspect the attic for possible defects.</p>
<p>Asbestos in the attic is only likely if the home dates back to the early 1970&#8217;s. At that time, asbestos was used for air duct insulation and for flue pipes. It was not used, however, to insulate attic spaces. Attic insulation typically consists of fiberglass, rock wool, or recycled cellulose.</p>
<p>The one error that was made by your home inspector was to confirm the lack of an access with no further comment. The disclosure in the inspection report should have been: &#8220;No attic access was found. It is recommended that an access be made to enable completion of this inspection.&#8221; (or words to that effect)</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/10/15/buyer-takes-issue-with-sellers-disclosure-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/10/15/buyer-takes-issue-with-sellers-disclosure-statement/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Complaints Against Property Managers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HouseDetective/~3/3OlBC87T8JE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/09/10/two-complaints-against-property-managers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complaints]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housedetective.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>The House Detective:  by Barry Stone, Certified Home Inspector</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> I recently moved from a house that I had been renting. A few months before moving, I noticed a crack in the window above the stall shower. I don&#8217;t know how or when the crack happened, but I notified the property manager and requested that he replace the glass. Nothing was done about this window until after I vacated the property, and now the cost of glass replacement has been charged to my security deposit. I&#8217;m wondering if temperature changes could have caused the crack, if the window should have been tempered safety glass, and if the glass should have been replaced before I moved. What do you think?  Kessa</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Kessa:</strong> :  There is no way to know with certainty what caused the glass to crack. The cause might have been temperature changes, but no one will ever know for sure. Therefore, you have an unsolvable point of contention with the property manager. You do not believe you broke the window, but the property manager apparently disagrees and holds you responsible for the damage.</p>
<p>On the other hand, there is an overriding issue. The property manager was remiss in neglecting the glass repair when it was first reported, while the shower was still being used by you and your family. Failure to replace broken glass near a shower exposes occupants to potential injury. Therefore, the property manager was professionally negligent. If you can prove that you notified him of the crack while you still occupied the home, you may have a strong case against the management company and the property owner. Hopefully, your notice regarding the cracked window was written, not verbal. If so, you could probably prevail in small claims court.</p>
<p>As for glass requirements at the shower: Tempered safety glass is required unless the window sill is higher than five feet above the shower floor.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Dear Barry:</strong><em> We moved out of our mobile home and are having trouble selling it. The park management has a requirement that they must approve all prospective buyers. So far, we&#8217;ve sent three buyers to their office. In each case, the manager sold a park-owned mobile home to our buyers. The park got the sale, while we continue to pay monthly rent for our park space. This seems very underhanded. Is there anything we can do about it?  Thomas</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Dear Thomas:</strong> :  There are two things you can do to prevent the park from stealing your buyers. First, you should accompany your prospective buyers to the park office, rather than sending them to the office on their own. Just tell the buyers, &#8220;Let&#8217;s go over to the park office and I&#8217;ll help you to get approved.&#8221; The park owner or manager will be less likely to pull a fast one with you sitting right there.</p>
<p>The other thing you should do is to make sure your mobile home is competitively marketed. This means the mobile home and yard area should be well maintained, and the unit should not be overpriced. If the condition and price of your unit compete well with those that are owned by the park, your buyers will be less likely to buy one from the park management.</p></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/09/10/two-complaints-against-property-managers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.housedetective.com/2009/09/10/two-complaints-against-property-managers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
