<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"> <channel><title>S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices - HousingViews</title> <link>http://www.housingviews.com</link> <description>S&amp;P's Blog on the Housing Market</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/HousingViews" /><feedburner:info uri="housingviews" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>HousingViews</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item><title>Forbes.com: Case And Shiller Say Housing Is Better, Not Back To Booming</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/8UT8sF_x4Gc/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/22/forbes-com-case-and-shiller-say-housing-is-better-not-back-to-booming/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:16:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Dave Guarino</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[S&P/Case-Shiller]]></category> <category><![CDATA[US Housing Prices]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5598</guid> <description><![CDATA[S&#38;P Dow Jones Indices hosted a discussion on the U.S. housing market with Professors Robert Shiller and Karl Case and Dr. David Blitzer. Read Steve Schaefer&#8217;s piece on this morning&#8217;s roundtable.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices hosted a discussion on the U.S. housing market with <b>Professors Robert Shiller</b> and <b>Karl Case</b> and <b>Dr. David Blitzer.</b></p><p>Read <a
href="http://onforb.es/10MoPwm" target="_blank">Steve Schaefer&#8217;s piece</a> on this morning&#8217;s roundtable.</p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/8UT8sF_x4Gc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/22/forbes-com-case-and-shiller-say-housing-is-better-not-back-to-booming/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/22/forbes-com-case-and-shiller-say-housing-is-better-not-back-to-booming/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=forbes-com-case-and-shiller-say-housing-is-better-not-back-to-booming</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>National Credit Default Rates Fell in April 2013 According to the S&amp;P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/-UbH9Qee-zY/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/21/national-credit-default-rates-fell-in-april-2013-according-to-the-spexperian-consumer-credit-default-indices/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:16:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Dave Guarino</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Consumer Credit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economic Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[10-City Composite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Credit Default Indices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David Blitzer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Experian]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5588</guid> <description><![CDATA[S&#38;P Dow Jones Indices released the latest results for the S&#38;P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices. Data is through April 2013. S&#38;P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices Press Release – May 2013]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices released the latest results for the S&amp;P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices. Data is through April 2013.<div
class='documentIcons'><div
class='documentIcons_icon'><a
href='http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Experian-Press-Release-5-21-13-2.pdf'><img
src='http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/plugins/attachment-file-icons/mime/pdf-icon.png'/></a></div><div
class='documentIcons_link'><a
href='http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Experian-Press-Release-5-21-13-2.pdf'>S&amp;P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices Press Release – May 2013</a></div></div><div
class='clear'></div></p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/-UbH9Qee-zY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/21/national-credit-default-rates-fell-in-april-2013-according-to-the-spexperian-consumer-credit-default-indices/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/21/national-credit-default-rates-fell-in-april-2013-according-to-the-spexperian-consumer-credit-default-indices/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=national-credit-default-rates-fell-in-april-2013-according-to-the-spexperian-consumer-credit-default-indices</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Stocks and Houses</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/m-FhYhQpcys/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/19/stocks-and-houses/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>David Blitzer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Economic Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[S&P/Case-Shiller Indices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5580</guid> <description><![CDATA[Twelve years ago when the boom in tech stocks ended, housing was considered a safe investment to escape to.  Six years ago the financial crisis took down both stocks and housing.  Clearly neither is without risk, but maybe the past can offer some hint as to which might be better.   Looking at the period [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twelve years ago when the boom in tech stocks ended, housing was considered a safe investment to escape to.  Six years ago the financial crisis took down both stocks and housing.  Clearly neither is without risk, but maybe the past can offer some hint as to which might be better.   Looking at the period since January 1987 when the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller 10-City Index begins to the most recent data point from last February,  stocks measured by the S&amp;P 500 are up 472% and home prices are up 154%.  Neither figure is adjusted for inflation and neither includes dividends or any adjustments for taxes.  However, if the starting point is the summer of 2000 when the stock market peaked, stocks are only 2% high now while housing is up 45%.  Alternatively, if one starts the comparison in October, 2002 when the tech bust bear market ended, stocks are up 77% since then while housing gained only 14%.   Maybe the most telling choice of  starting point is October 2007 when the financial crisis began &#8212; from then to last February stocks are down 2% and housing is down 24%.   When you buy matters almost as much as what you buy.</p><p>For those who like the big picture, the chart compares the S&amp;P 500 and the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller 10-City Home Price Index.  The Home Prices were rebased to start at the same level as the S&amp;P 500 in January 1987.</p><div
id="attachment_5582" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 430px"><a
href="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/stocks-and-houses.jpg"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-5582" alt="Source: S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices, S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices" src="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/stocks-and-houses-420x324.jpg" width="420" height="324" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">Source: S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices, S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices</p></div> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/m-FhYhQpcys" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/19/stocks-and-houses/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/19/stocks-and-houses/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=stocks-and-houses</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Gold in the House</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/4D2fVneevi0/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/18/gold-in-the-house/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:03:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>David Blitzer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5570</guid> <description><![CDATA[Through the last decade or two of gyrating stock markets and financial crisis two investments have been heralded as booms, busts and the only place to safely stash your assets: gold and your house.  With gold prices appearing to take a hint from the past behavior of home prices, it might be interesting to compare [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through the last decade or two of gyrating stock markets and financial crisis two investments have been heralded as booms, busts and the only place to safely stash your assets: gold and your house.  With gold prices appearing to take a hint from the past behavior of home prices, it might be interesting to compare one to the other.  The chart shows the monthly average price of gold and the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller 10 City Home Price Index.  The index is rescaled so that it was equal to the gold price in January 1987, making it easy to compare the ups and downs of both series.  The gold price is the London afternoon gold fixing in U.S. dollars.  The data on the chart are from January, 1987 when the home price series begins to February 2013, the latest home price data point.  This excludes some of the recent weakness in gold prices. (Click on graph for a larger image.)</p><p
style="text-align: justify"><div
id="attachment_5575" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 430px"><a
href="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Golden-Homes2.jpg"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-5575" alt="Source: S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices; St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank" src="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Golden-Homes2-420x324.jpg" width="420" height="324" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">Source: S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices; St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank</p></div> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/4D2fVneevi0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/18/gold-in-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/18/gold-in-the-house/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=gold-in-the-house</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Australian RMBS Heading For Busiest Year Since 2008</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/o85B8gOZO1Q/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/16/australian-rmbs-heading-for-busiest-year-since-2008/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Vera Chaplin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific Market]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RMBS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vera Chaplin]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5566</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Australian residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market may be heading for its busiest year since 2008 issuance amid renewed investor interest in the asset class, according to a new report issued by Standard &#38; Poor&#8217;s Ratings Services. The report, &#8220;Australian RMBS Issuance Has Strengthened, But Is The Revival Sustainable?,&#8221; notes that more than A$8 billion [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Australian residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market may be heading for its busiest year since 2008 issuance amid renewed investor interest in the asset class, according to a new report issued by Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s Ratings Services. The report, &#8220;<a
href="https://www.globalcreditportal.com/ratingsdirect/showArticlePage.do?object_id=7932229&amp;rev_id=1&amp;sid=1124367&amp;sind=A&amp;">Australian RMBS Issuance Has Strengthened, But Is The Revival Sustainable?</a>,&#8221; notes that more than A$8 billion of RMBS has been issued in Australia so far this year, but says the sustainability of the market&#8217;s recent revival remains sensitive to issues such as global economic and financial market conditions. It also discusses the performance outlook for Australian RMBS in 2013 and the implications of upcoming regulatory changes.</p><p>Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s Managing Director Vera Chaplin says: &#8220;While we are less pessimistic about global economic and credit conditions than we were in 2012, Australia&#8217;s RMBS market isn&#8217;t immune to the flow-on effects of some plausible downside global risks, such as contagion from the unresolved eurozone crisis, excessive fiscal tightening in the U.S., and a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Although less likely, rapid deterioration in the Australian economy that drives a rapid increase in unemployment and hurts house prices could adversely impact the performance of RMBS and new issuance conditions.&#8221;</p><p>Standard &amp; Poor’s expects the strong issuance levels seen in  the past few months to continue in 2013, potentially pushing total RMBS issuance volume beyond A$20 billion. At the same time, we expect our ratings on outstanding RMBS to remain stable during the year.</p><p>See the full report <a
title="Australia RMBS" href="http://ow.ly/d/1fFR ">here. </a></p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/o85B8gOZO1Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/16/australian-rmbs-heading-for-busiest-year-since-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/16/australian-rmbs-heading-for-busiest-year-since-2008/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=australian-rmbs-heading-for-busiest-year-since-2008</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Homes vs. Condos</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/Ztw2FeiYBUI/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/02/homes-vs-condos/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>David Blitzer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[S&P/Case-Shiller Indices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category> <category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5555</guid> <description><![CDATA[S&#38;P/Case-Shiller Home Prices Indices cover condominiums in five markets as well as single family homes in 20 cities.  The table compares the boom-bust and recovery results for homes and condominiums in the five cities &#8212; Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Boston and New York.   The overall performance is similar between homes and condos but there [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Prices Indices cover condominiums in five markets as well as single family homes in 20 cities.  The table compares the boom-bust and recovery results for homes and condominiums in the five cities &#8212; Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Boston and New York.   The overall performance is similar between homes and condos but there are a few differences. Los Angeles condos had the largest rise of any market, gaining more from 2000 to their peak than even Miami did.  New York condos have recovered much more strongly than single family homes in the region.  Peak and trough dates are generally close between the two housing types. (Click on the table for a larger image.)</p><p><a
href="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Homes-and-Condos.jpg"><img
class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5557" alt="Homes and Condos" src="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Homes-and-Condos-420x324.jpg" width="420" height="324" /></a></p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/Ztw2FeiYBUI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/02/homes-vs-condos/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/02/homes-vs-condos/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=homes-vs-condos</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Principal Forgiveness, Still The Best Way To Limit U.S. Mortgage Redefaults, Is Becoming More Prevalent</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/ZaBPVlXfs58/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/02/principal-forgiveness-still-the-best-way-to-limit-u-s-mortgage-redefaults-is-becoming-more-prevalent/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:53:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Vandana Sharma</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Economic Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Housing Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RMBS]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5553</guid> <description><![CDATA[In June of last year, Standard &#38; Poor&#8217;s Ratings Services contended that principal forgiveness was more likely to keep U.S. mortgage borrowers current than more commonly used modification tools (see &#8220;The Best Way to Limit U.S. Mortgage Redefaults May Be Principal Forgiveness,&#8221; June 15, 2012). Data gathered since then not only support this view but [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June of last year, Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s Ratings Services contended that principal forgiveness was more likely to keep U.S. mortgage borrowers current than more commonly used modification tools (see &#8220;<a
href="https://www.globalcreditportal.com/ratingsdirect/showArticlePage.do?object_id=7380366&amp;rev_id=7&amp;sid=1122610&amp;sind=A&amp;">The Best Way to Limit U.S. Mortgage Redefaults May Be Principal Forgiveness</a>,&#8221; June 15, 2012). Data gathered since then not only support this view but also demonstrate servicers&#8217; growing adoption of this form of loss mitigation.</p><p>As of February of this year, more than 1.5 million homeowners have received a permanent modification through the U.S. federal government&#8217;s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Since the publication of our June 2012 article, there have been more than 400,000 additional modifications on outstanding mortgages (as of March 2013). This translates to roughly a 22% rate of growth in the number of modifications on an additional $2.4 billion in mortgage debt.</p><p>Under the HAMP Principal Reduction Alternative (PRA) program, which provides monetary incentives to servicers that reduce principal, borrowers have received approximately $9.6 billion in principal forgiveness as of March 2013. Interestingly, servicers have ramped up their use of principal forgiveness on loans that don&#8217;t necessarily qualify for PRA assistance. Indeed, among the top five servicers for non-agency loans, we&#8217;ve noted that principal forgiveness, as a percentage of average modifications performed on a monthly basis, has increased by about 200% since the latter half of 2011 (see Chart 1). We attribute part of this to the $25 billion settlement in February 2012 with 49 state attorneys general and these same five servicers: Ally/GMAC, Bank of America, Citi, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo). In fact, although principal reduction remains the least common type of loan modification among servicers, the percentage of non-agency modified loans that have received principal forgiveness has increased by 3% since June 2012 . Since 2009, servicers have forgiven principal on approximately $45 billion of outstanding non-agency mortgages.*</p><p><a
title="RMBS" href="http://ow.ly/d/1dHw ">Click here</a> to read S&amp;P&#8217;s full report.</p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/ZaBPVlXfs58" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/02/principal-forgiveness-still-the-best-way-to-limit-u-s-mortgage-redefaults-is-becoming-more-prevalent/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/02/principal-forgiveness-still-the-best-way-to-limit-u-s-mortgage-redefaults-is-becoming-more-prevalent/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=principal-forgiveness-still-the-best-way-to-limit-u-s-mortgage-redefaults-is-becoming-more-prevalent</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Rise and Fall</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/-ebayDMO08Q/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/01/rise-and-fall/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>David Blitzer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Housing Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[S&P/Case-Shiller Indices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bigger they are]]></category> <category><![CDATA[the harder they fall]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5543</guid> <description><![CDATA[Did huge price gains in the housing boom make for a deeper dive in the collapse?  Now that we can confidently say we&#8217;re past the bottom and the housing bust is behind us, we can answer this question with the data.  The chart shows the peak index value on the horizontal axis and the percentage [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did huge price gains in the housing boom make for a deeper dive in the collapse?  Now that we can confidently say we&#8217;re past the bottom and the housing bust is behind us, we can answer this question with the data.  The chart shows the peak index value on the horizontal axis and the percentage drop on the vertical axis for each of the 20 cities plus the 10 and 20 city composites. The cities are labeled, the composites are identified as &#8220;10&#8243; and &#8220;20.&#8221; The results are clear &#8212; there is a strong tendency for cities like Phoenix, Las Vegas and Miami (all in the lower right corner) to plunge after their outsize gains.  At the other end of the diagonal in the upper left corner Dallas, Denver and Charlotte saw modest increases and modest declines.  Were the pattern perfect, all the cities would lie on the diagonal; there are probably other factors that affect the depth of the decline. (Click on chart for larger image)<a
href="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Rise-and-Fall.jpg"><img
class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5545" alt="Rise and Fall" src="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Rise-and-Fall-420x324.jpg" width="420" height="324" /></a></p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/-ebayDMO08Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/01/rise-and-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/05/01/rise-and-fall/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rise-and-fall</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>CNBC Exclusive Interview with David Blitzer on U.S. Home Prices for February</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/5_VdZoojIHs/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/04/30/cnbc-exclusive-interview-with-david-blitzer-on-u-s-home-prices-for-february/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:22:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Dave Guarino</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Economic Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Housing Data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[S&P/Case-Shiller Indices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David Blitzer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy and Real Estate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[home prices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[latest results]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5539</guid> <description><![CDATA[David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the S&#38;P Index Committee, discusses the latest data results for the S&#38;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices on CNBC.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the S&amp;P Index Committee, <a
href="http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?play=1&amp;video=3000164247#eyJ2aWQiOiIzMDAwMTY0MjQ3IiwiZW5jVmlkIjoiV0NRRytMSFo5VnR0ZnlIK0RCTXZQQT09IiwidlRhYiI6InRyYW5zY3JpcHQiLCJ2UGFnZSI6IiIsImdOYXYiOlsiXHUwMGEwTGF0ZXN0IFZpZGVvIl0sImdTZWN0IjoiQUxMIiwiZ1BhZ2UiOiIxIiwic3ltIjoiIiwic2VhcmNoIjoiIn0=" target="_blank">discusses the latest data results for the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices on CNBC</a>.</p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/5_VdZoojIHs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/04/30/cnbc-exclusive-interview-with-david-blitzer-on-u-s-home-prices-for-february/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/04/30/cnbc-exclusive-interview-with-david-blitzer-on-u-s-home-prices-for-february/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=cnbc-exclusive-interview-with-david-blitzer-on-u-s-home-prices-for-february</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Behind the Numbers in the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Release</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HousingViews/~3/ABWxwJ-qLt0/</link> <comments>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/04/30/behind-the-numbers-in-the-spcase-shiller-release/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>David Blitzer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.housingviews.com/?p=5531</guid> <description><![CDATA[The February S&#38;P/Case-Shiller Release, out this morning, shows a strong performance by housing across all 20 metropolitan areas.  The composite of 20 cities rose 9.3% in the last year, the best gain since May 2006 and seasonally adjusted all 20 cities rose month to month for two consecutive months; the last time that happened was [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The February S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Release, out this morning, shows a strong performance by housing across all 20 metropolitan areas.  The composite of 20 cities rose 9.3% in the last year, the best gain since May 2006 and seasonally adjusted all 20 cities rose month to month for two consecutive months; the last time that happened was at the beginning of 2005.</p><p>The &#8220;spagetti&#8221; chart shows how the 20 cities have performed since the composites hit bottom in March 2012. While everything is up since then, some like Phoenix are way up and others like New York are barely ahead.  Still others like Chicago appear to have peaked and fallen a bit.  (Click on the chart for a bigger image.)</p><p><a
href="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Since-the-Bottom.jpg"><img
class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5532" alt="Since the Bottom" src="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Since-the-Bottom-420x324.jpg" width="420" height="324" /></a></p><p>The table compares the peaks and troughs of the 20 cities &#8212; where the gain was the biggest or the tumble was the largest.</p><p><a
href="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/How-Cities-Did-February-2013.jpg"><img
class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5533" alt="How Cities Did February 2013" src="http://www.housingviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/How-Cities-Did-February-2013-420x324.jpg" width="420" height="324" /></a></p> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HousingViews/~4/ABWxwJ-qLt0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/04/30/behind-the-numbers-in-the-spcase-shiller-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.housingviews.com/2013/04/30/behind-the-numbers-in-the-spcase-shiller-release/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=behind-the-numbers-in-the-spcase-shiller-release</feedburner:origLink></item> </channel> </rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.551 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-22 16:37:44 -->
