<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>IGP Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.internetgovernance.org</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IGPBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="igpblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>IGPBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Will the GAC go away if the Board doesn’t follow its advice?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/KYNXpGne1bw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/05/13/will-the-gac-go-away-if-the-board-doesnt-follow-its-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A video was posted of an ICANN staff member interviewing the Chair of ICANN&#8217;s Governmental Advisory Committee, Heather Dryden of Canada. The interview appeared on the ICANN website one day before the deadline for public comments about the Beijing advice issued by the GAC. The Beijing Communique, hammered out in a closed room where no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/05/13/will-the-gac-go-away-if-the-board-doesnt-follow-its-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/05/13/will-the-gac-go-away-if-the-board-doesnt-follow-its-advice/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=will-the-gac-go-away-if-the-board-doesnt-follow-its-advice</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Can’t sell your IPv4 numbers? Try leasing them.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/-tK6PvewuPM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/28/cant-sell-your-ipv4-numbers-try-leasing-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenden Kuerbis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a &#8220;policy implementation and experience report&#8221; presented at ARIN 31 in Barbados, ARIN&#8217;s staff noted that they are seeing &#8220;circumstances&#8221; related to the leasing of IPv4 number blocks.  At the recent INET in Denver, ARIN&#8217;s Director John Curran alleged that there is a &#8220;correlation&#8221; between address leasing activity and organizations that have been unable to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/28/cant-sell-your-ipv4-numbers-try-leasing-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/28/cant-sell-your-ipv4-numbers-try-leasing-them/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=cant-sell-your-ipv4-numbers-try-leasing-them</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>WTF? WTPF! The continuing battle over Internet governance principles</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/n5jznzjkZ8I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/23/wtf-wtpf-the-continuing-battle-over-internet-governance-principles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember all the businesses, internet techies and NGOs who were screaming about an “ITU takeover of the Internet” a year ago? Where are they now? Because this time, we actually need them. May 14 – 21 is Internet governance week in Geneva. We have declared it so because there will be three events in that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/23/wtf-wtpf-the-continuing-battle-over-internet-governance-principles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/23/wtf-wtpf-the-continuing-battle-over-internet-governance-principles/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=wtf-wtpf-the-continuing-battle-over-internet-governance-principles</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>An Internet ‘free from Government Control:’ A worthy principle</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/6CF5IEWiHy4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/14/an-internet-free-from-government-control-a-worthy-principle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, April 10, a bill &#8220;to Affirm the Policy of the United States Regarding Internet Governance&#8221; was marked up in the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill is an attempt to put a formal policy statement into statute law. The effective part says simply: It is the policy of the United States to promote [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/14/an-internet-free-from-government-control-a-worthy-principle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/14/an-internet-free-from-government-control-a-worthy-principle/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=an-internet-free-from-government-control-a-worthy-principle</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Who needs the ITU when you have a GAC?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/TqhqPjxY_-k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/11/who-needs-the-itu-when-you-have-a-gac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone doubted our recurring warnings that ICANN’s GAC is evolving into an intergovernmental organization, they should have come to Beijing for ICANN 46. A new GAC communique was released in the middle of the public comment forum. As people downloaded and read it, they discovered that GAC’s “advice” is really a complete redesign of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/11/who-needs-the-itu-when-you-have-a-gac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/11/who-needs-the-itu-when-you-have-a-gac/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=who-needs-the-itu-when-you-have-a-gac</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>One World, One Internet: An open discussion…in China</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/QdzoywbsBQU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/03/one-world-one-internet-an-open-discussion-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN&#8217;s Noncommercial Users Constituency, which represents civil society and individuals in the domain name policy making process, has established a traditional of holding policy conferences at ICANN meetings that are usually far more interesting and creative than the official workshops put on by ICANN. The Beijing meeting is no exception. NCUC is facilitating a dialogue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/03/one-world-one-internet-an-open-discussion-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/03/one-world-one-internet-an-open-discussion-in-china/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=one-world-one-internet-an-open-discussion-in-china</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How ARIN and U.S. Commerce Department were duped by the ITU</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/l3lt0OA7Qe8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/28/how-arin-and-u-s-commerce-department-were-duped-by-the-itu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ARIN is the Internet numbers registry for the North American region. It likes to present itself as a paragon of multistakeholder governance and a staunch opponent of the International Telecommunication Union&#8217;s encroachments into Internet governance. Surely, if anyone wants to keep the ITU out of Internet addressing and routing policy, it would be ARIN. And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/28/how-arin-and-u-s-commerce-department-were-duped-by-the-itu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/28/how-arin-and-u-s-commerce-department-were-duped-by-the-itu/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=how-arin-and-u-s-commerce-department-were-duped-by-the-itu</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Needs Assessments in IPv4?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/W5kHPSyLgag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/20/the-end-of-needs-assessments-in-ipv4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A policy change now being considered by the European IP address registry RIPE-NCC would completely eliminate needs assessments as an eligibility criterion for acquiring IPv4 number blocks. If successful, policy proposal 2013-3 would liberalize the allocation and use of IPv4 number blocks, and open the door to a much more efficient and predictable market for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/20/the-end-of-needs-assessments-in-ipv4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/20/the-end-of-needs-assessments-in-ipv4/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-end-of-needs-assessments-in-ipv4</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulating the Market for Zero-day Exploits: Look to the demand side</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/hBPIJaeZsI0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/15/regulating-the-market-for-zero-day-exploits-look-to-the-demand-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A market has developed in which specialized firms discover new vulnerabilities in software and sell that knowledge for tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. These vulnerabilities are known as “zero day exploits” because there is no advance knowledge of them before they are used. In this blog post, we recognize that this market may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/15/regulating-the-market-for-zero-day-exploits-look-to-the-demand-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/15/regulating-the-market-for-zero-day-exploits-look-to-the-demand-side/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=regulating-the-market-for-zero-day-exploits-look-to-the-demand-side</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom to innovate and new top level domains</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IGPBlog/~3/FgkQdRSA7is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/06/freedom-to-innovate-and-new-top-level-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milton Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetgovernance.org/?p=1539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are hundreds of applications for generic words in ICANN’s new top level domain program. They include .BOOK, .MUSIC, .CLOUD, .ACCOUNTANT, .ARAB and .ART. Some of the applicants for these domains have chosen to make direct use of the name space under the TLD for their own sites rather than offering them for broad general [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/06/freedom-to-innovate-and-new-top-level-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/03/06/freedom-to-innovate-and-new-top-level-domains/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=freedom-to-innovate-and-new-top-level-domains</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.689 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-21 20:26:39 -->
