Full details at: http://www.webcom-montreal.com

My colleague Benoit David and myself will spend most of the day at Webcom and will be delighted to meet you there. Please let me know if you plan on attending too.

Surviving 20 years in this hectic industry is an achievement in itself. But I feel particularly proud that we did so while remaining true to our core values, thus avoiding the latest technological hype, financing fad, and other medicine-man gobbledygook.

While tools and technology changed over the years, we remained focused on the same goal: to design robust and finely engineered software that perfectly align with business needs, as well as human needs.

Of course, things have changed so much that I sometimes feel like I lived through the entire history of our industry in fast forward. From the dinosaur era right through to Modern Times, and with a few brief relapses into the Dark Ages along the way.

I could tell 200 odd stories from those 20 years, but let me tell you one that occurred to me in a quick flashback this week.

It was 1990 and I had just replaced my Mac Plus 128KB with the new Mac IIcx - a sleeker, more power model with a flatter keyboard that promised to relieve the early symptoms of what turned out to be carpal-tunnel syndrome (I was a precursor to that too!)

I decided to turn my Mac Plus and its whopping 20 MB hard drive and full 8” footprint into a QuickMail server – the precursor to email. It ran on Apple Talk and pre-dated the TCP/ IP standard used today, so it used a modem to store and forward emails through a regulator phone line. After getting through some of the challenges of setting it up, I faced a larger and more intractable challenge: Who could I send an e-mail to? I was the only person in my ecosystem to have such a device.

Thus, the next logical step was to exchange e-mails with my good friend Rafi in Paris (who turned out to be the first commercial Internet Service Provider in France a few years later!). For a good while, we felt like Alexander Graham Bell and Thomas Watson – alone in our ability to communicate with one another, but proud that we were on to something so big, so early on in the game. Despite spending an unreasonable amount of time and money making this rather unreliable system work, we had fun and we learned a lot.

I could tell you many similar stories of ideas and technologies that started one way and ended up going in unintended, though more beneficial, directions. Of course, I don't imply that one should run random experiments. But planning for various futures and constantly re-planning them is an essential part of what I've learned in 20 years.

I now feel ready for a second 20-year round if you are. Our success was only possible thanks to our clients, partners, staff members and former staff members, many of whom I was very pleased to see this last Thursday.

At one end, Microsoft is readying the next version of their OS: Windows 7. Windows 7 is nothing more than Windows Vista done right: more stable and polished. At the other end, Google announced Chrome OS, a Linux-based minimal operating system meant to run a web browser on a computer without any further sophistication.

Our position at INM clearly leans towards the latter side, not because we prefer Google's logo to Microsoft's but mainly because we had predicted that Operating Systems were becoming irrelevant commodities (see conclusion of "All aboard! The new Intel-based Mac is leaving the station; here's how to switch platforms" and that real challenges were moving away from the metal and closer to the mental. Our key argument is that, thanks to RIAs and technologies such as Adobe Flex, MS Silverlight and HTML 5, it is nowadays possible to deliver rich content and interactivity without the cost and hassle of desktop applications.

Ironically though, while Google's core message is that an operating system ought to be small, subordinate to the web browser and mostly free; they are precisely drawing attention to the relevance on the operating system by discussing it in the media.

On the other hand, Microsoft is crafting a sophisticated pricing plan for Windows 7, with an array of colors and flavors ranging from Home Edition to Ultimate thus underscoring that the choice of the right OS, and hence the OS per se, matters.

Moving forward, I think there will be confusion and internal conflicts at Google, and ultimately Android will prevail as Google's canonical operating system for all devices ranging from smartphones to tablets to small PCs (as well as yet-to-be invented small devices).

Windows and MacOS would obviously remain the OSes of choices for users of Photoshop, video editing and other high-end applications. But as the cloud becomes more reliable and people discover the true benefits of RIAs, most common applications will migrate to lightweight (and invisible) OSes, and only specialists would need to shop for heavier operating systems.