<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>IRS Tax Audit News</title>
	
	<link>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog</link>
	<description>Gary S. Wolfe, Professional Law Corporation</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IRSTaxAuditNews" /><feedburner:info uri="irstaxauditnews" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>IRSTaxAuditNews</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>FBAR - Possible Criminal Charges</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/2ODJSZp5el4/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/02/22/fbar-possible-criminal-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FBAR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to IRS FAQ (#14) of May 6, 2009, Taxpayers who do not report income from foreign bank/financial accounts or file FBAR’s face up to 19 years in jail:
What are some of the criminal charges I might face if I don&#8217;t come in under voluntary disclosure and the IRS finds me?

Possible criminal charges related to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to IRS FAQ (#14) of May 6, 2009, Taxpayers who do not report income from foreign bank/financial accounts or file FBAR’s face up to 19 years in jail:</p>
<p><em>What are some of the criminal charges I might face if I don&#8217;t come in under voluntary disclosure and the IRS finds me?<br />
</em><br />
Possible criminal charges related to tax returns include tax evasion (26 U.S.C. § 7201), filing a false return (26 U.S.C. § 7206(1)) and failure to file an income tax return (26 U.S.C. § 7203). The failure to file an FBAR and the filing of a false FBAR are both violations that are subject to criminal penalties under 31 U.S.C.§ 5322.</p>
<p>A person convicted of tax evasion is subject to a prison term of up to five years and a fine of up to $250,000. Filing a false return subjects a person to a prison term of up to three years and a fine of up to $250,000. A person who fails to file a tax return is subject to a prison term of up to one year and a fine of up to $100,000. Failing to file an FBAR subjects a person to a prison term of up to ten years and criminal penalties of up to $500,000.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/2ODJSZp5el4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/02/22/fbar-possible-criminal-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/02/22/fbar-possible-criminal-charges/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FBAR: Civil Pentalties</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/iJ2Gl_VGbrw/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/02/09/fbar-civil-pentalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FBAR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TD F 90-22.1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[voluntary disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS FBAR FAQ #15 (posted on 5/06/09) states: Taxpayers who fail to report foreign bank/financial accounts face civil penalties (based on the entity tax reporting due).
What are some of the civil penalties that might apply if I don&#8217;t come in under voluntary disclosure and the IRS finds me? How do they work?
The following is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRS FBAR FAQ #15 (posted on 5/06/09) states: Taxpayers who fail to report foreign bank/financial accounts face civil penalties (based on the entity tax reporting due).</p>
<p><em>What are some of the civil penalties that might apply if I don&#8217;t come in under voluntary disclosure and the IRS finds me? How do they work?</em></p>
<p>The following is a summary of potential reporting requirements and civil penalties that could apply to a taxpayer, depending on his or her particular facts and circumstances.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file the Form TD F 90-22.1 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, commonly known as an &#8220;FBAR&#8221;). United States citizens, residents and certain other persons must annually report their direct or indirect financial interest in, or signature authority (or other authority that is comparable to signature authority) over, a financial account that is maintained with a financial institution located in a foreign country if, for any calendar year, the aggregate value of all foreign accounts exceeded $10,000 at any time during the year. Generally, the civil penalty for willfully failing to file an FBAR can be as high as the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the total balance of the foreign account. See 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5). Nonwillful violations are subject to a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file Form 3520, Annual Return to Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts.  Taxpayers must also report various transactions involving foreign trusts, including creation of a foreign trust by a United States person, transfers of property from a United States person to a foreign trust and receipt of distributions from foreign trusts under section 6048. This return also reports the receipt of gifts from foreign entities under section 6039F. The penalty for failing to file each one of these information returns, or for filing an incomplete return, is 35 percent of the gross reportable amount, except for returns reporting gifts, where the penalty is five percent of the gift per month, up to a maximum penalty of 25 percent of the gift.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file Form 3520-A, Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner. Taxpayers must also report ownership interests in foreign trusts, by United States persons with various interests in and powers over those trusts under section 6048(b). The penalty for failing to file each one of these information returns or for filing an incomplete return, is five percent of the gross value of trust assets determined to be owned bythe United States person.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Person with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations. Certain United States persons who are officers, directors or shareholders in certain foreign corporations (including International Business Corporations) are required to report information under sections 6035, 6038 and 6046. The penalty for failing to file each one of these information returns is $10,000, with an additional $10,000 added for each month the failure continues beginning 90 days after the taxpayer is notified of the delinquency, up to a maximum of $50,000 per return.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file Form 5472, Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or Business. Taxpayers may be required to report transactions between a 25 percent foreign-owned domestic corporation or a foreign corporation engaged in a trade or business in the United States and a related party as required by sections 6038A and 6038C. The penalty for failing to file each one of these information returns, or to keep certain records regarding reportable transactions, is $10,000, with an additional $10,000 added for each month the failure continues beginning 90 days after the taxpayer is notified of the delinquency, up to a maximum of $50,000 per return.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file Form 926, Return by a U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation. Taxpayers are required to report transfers of property to foreign corporations and other information under section 6038B. The penalty for failing to file each one of these information returns is ten percent of the value of the property transferred, up to a maximum of $100,000 per return, with no limit if the failure to report the transfer was intentional.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file Form 8865, Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships. United States persons with certain interests in foreign partnerships use this form to report interests in and transactions of the foreign partnerships, transfers of property to the foreign partnerships, and acquisitions, dispositions and changes in foreign partnership interests under sections 6038, 6038B, and 6046A. Penalties include $10,000 for failure to file each return, with an additional $10,000 added for each month the failure continues beginning 90 days after the taxpayer is notified of the delinquency, up to a maximum of $50,000 per return, and ten percent of the value of any transferred property that is not reported, subject to a $100,000 limit.</p>
<p>• Fraud penalties imposed under sections 6651(f) or 6663. Where an underpayment of tax, or a failure to file a tax return, is due to fraud, the taxpayer is liable for penalties that, although calculated differently, essentially amount to 75 percent of the unpaid tax.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to file a tax return imposed under section 6651(a)(1). Generally, taxpayers are required to file income tax returns. If a taxpayer fails to do so, a penalty of 5 percent of the balance due, plus an additional 5 percent for each month or fraction thereof during which the failure continues may be imposed. The penalty shall not exceed 25 percent.</p>
<p>• A penalty for failing to pay the amount of tax shown on the return under section 6651(a)(2). If a taxpayer fails to pay the amount of tax shown on the return, he or she may be liable for a penalty of .5 percent of the amount of tax shown on the return, plus an additional .5 percent for each additional month or fraction thereof that the amount remains unpaid, not exceeding 25 percent.</p>
<p>• An accuracy-related penalty on underpayments imposed under section 6662. Depending upon which component of the accuracy-related penalty is applicable, a taxpayer may be liable for a 20 percent or 40 percent penalty.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/iJ2Gl_VGbrw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/02/09/fbar-civil-pentalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/02/09/fbar-civil-pentalties/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FBAR Filing: Statute of Limitations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/AOs6rA_sq1w/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/25/fbar-filing-statute-of-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FBAR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[voluntary disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/24/09, in FAQ #31, the IRS confirmed they will be able to assess taxes under a 6 year statute of limitations if the IRS can prove a substantial omission of gross income:
How can the IRS propose adjustments to tax for a six-year period without either an agreement from the taxpayer or a statutory exception [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/24/09, in <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=210027,00.html">FAQ #31</a>, the IRS confirmed they will be able to assess taxes under a 6 year statute of limitations if the IRS can prove a substantial omission of gross income:</p>
<p>How can the IRS propose adjustments to tax for a six-year period without either an agreement from the taxpayer or a statutory exception to the normal three-year statute of limitations for making those adjustments?</p>
<p>Going back six years is part of the resolution offered by the IRS for resolving offshore voluntary disclosures. The taxpayer must agree to assessment of the liabilities for those years in order to get the benefit of the reduced penalty framework. If the taxpayer does not agree to the tax, interest and penalty proposed by the voluntary disclosure examiner, the case will be referred to the field for a complete examination. In that examination, normal statute of limitations rules will apply. If no exception to the normal three-year statute applies, the IRS will only be able to assess tax, penalty and interest for three years. However, if the period of limitations was open because, for example, the IRS can prove a substantial omission of gross income, six years of liability may be assessed. Similarly, if there was a failure to file certain information returns, such as Form 3520 or Form 5471, the statute of limitations will not have begun to run. If the IRS can prove fraud, there is no statute of limitations for assessing tax.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/AOs6rA_sq1w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/25/fbar-filing-statute-of-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/25/fbar-filing-statute-of-limitations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS to Expand Audits as Cash Runs Low</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/aazDzv51CXQ/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/22/irs-to-expand-audits-as-cash-runs-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Joe Mont, TheStreet.com &#8211; The Internal Revenue Service, trying to recoup some of the estimated $14 billion that companies underpay in employer taxes a year, plans to wage a three-year campaign to audit 6,000 businesses.
Click link above for complete article.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Joe Mont, <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10661647/1/irs-to-expand-audits-as-cash-runs-low.html">TheStreet.com </a>&#8211; The Internal Revenue Service, trying to recoup some of the estimated $14 billion that companies underpay in employer taxes a year, plans to wage a three-year campaign to audit 6,000 businesses.</p>
<p>Click link above for complete article.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/aazDzv51CXQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/22/irs-to-expand-audits-as-cash-runs-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/22/irs-to-expand-audits-as-cash-runs-low/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Currency Transaction Report (CTR) &amp; Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/oA3im70WOlo/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/13/currency-transaction-report-ctr-suspicious-activity-report-sar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FBAR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CTRC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. financial institutions file Currency Transaction Reports (CTR) and Suspicious Activity Reports (SAR) with the IRS Detroit Computing Center (uploaded into the IRS/DCC Currency Banking and Retrieval System database at the IRS/DCC).
The combined CTR/SAS currency transaction reports provides a paper trail (or roadmap) for investigations of financial crimes and illegal activities including: tax evasion, embezzlement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. financial institutions file Currency Transaction Reports (CTR) and Suspicious Activity Reports (SAR) with the IRS Detroit Computing Center (uploaded into the IRS/DCC Currency Banking and Retrieval System database at the IRS/DCC).</p>
<p>The combined CTR/SAS currency transaction reports provides a paper trail (or roadmap) for investigations of financial crimes and illegal activities including: tax evasion, embezzlement and money laundering.  Between 1994 - 1997, the IRS criminal Investigation Division initiated 1030 investigations as a result of CTR/SAR (Currency Transaction Reports).  <br />
 <br />
Report/Requirements</p>
<p><strong>Currency Transaction Report</strong> (CTR) - Filed by financial institutions that engage in a currency transaction in excess of $10,000.<br />
 <br />
<strong>Currency Transaction Report Casino</strong> (CTRC) - Filed by a casino to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000.</p>
<p><strong>Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts</strong> (FBAR) - Filed by individuals to report a financial interest in or signatory authority over one or more accounts in foreign countries, if the aggregate value of these accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year.<br />
 <br />
<strong>IRS Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business</strong> - Filed by persons engaged in a trade or business who, in the course of that trade or business, receives more than $10,000 in cash in one transaction or two or more related transactions within a twelve month period.<br />
 <br />
<strong>Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)</strong> - Filed on transactions or attempted transactions involving at least $5,000 that the financial institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect the money was derived from illegal activities. Also filed when transactions are part of a plan to violate federal laws and financial reporting requirements (structuring).</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/oA3im70WOlo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/13/currency-transaction-report-ctr-suspicious-activity-report-sar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/13/currency-transaction-report-ctr-suspicious-activity-report-sar/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit Suisse (Casualty Loss)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/lIK036VTsxk/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/08/credit-suisse-casualty-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[casualty loss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tax loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investors at four high-end luxury resorts have filed a class action lawsuit against Credit Suisse and Cushman &#38; Wakefield, contending they conspired to inflate the value of property so that they could take them over.
In the Complaint, the Plaintiff’s lawyers contend that Credit Suisse and Cushman &#38; Wakefield conspired by setting up a Cayman Islands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investors at four high-end luxury resorts have filed a class action lawsuit against Credit Suisse and Cushman &amp; Wakefield, contending they conspired to inflate the value of property so that they could take them over.</p>
<p>In the Complaint, the Plaintiff’s lawyers contend that Credit Suisse and Cushman &amp; Wakefield conspired by setting up a Cayman Islands branch to circumvent a federal law on real estate appraisals.  The Plaintiff alleges they inflated the value of resorts and made millions of dollars in fees on loans against the property.  Credit Suisse knew the resorts would most likely default under the weight of inflated values which would allow the bank to take ownership of each on the behalf of the Creditor.</p>
<p><strong>For taxpayers who have been defrauded, they may be eligible for a tax loss deduction for their fraud damages if the fraud is considered theft under their state’s law (see Gerstell v. Commissioner 46 TC 161 (1966)).  The tax loss deduction may be carried back for prior years for tax refund, or carried forward for future years for tax free income up to the amount of the tax loss.</strong></p>
<p>See article,<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/business/05resorts.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">Credit Suisse is Accused of Defrauding Investors in 4 Resorts</a><br />
The New York Times, January 5, 2010.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/lIK036VTsxk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/08/credit-suisse-casualty-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/08/credit-suisse-casualty-loss/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>UBS Client Who Hid $6.1 Million From IRS Avoids Jail</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/K3rMgwM8TlY/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/07/ubs-client-who-hid-61-million-from-irs-avoids-jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Voreacos, Bloomberg.com 
A New Jersey businessman who admitted using a UBS AG account to hide $6.1 million from U.S. tax authorities was sentenced to five years probation by a judge who credited his cooperation with prosecutors.
Juergen Homann, 67, also was fined $60,000 and ordered to perform 300 hours of community service by U.S. District [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By David Voreacos, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGDntBO90Meg&amp;pos=6">Bloomberg.com </a></p>
<p>A New Jersey businessman who admitted using a UBS AG account to hide $6.1 million from U.S. tax authorities was sentenced to five years probation by a judge who credited his cooperation with prosecutors.</p>
<p>Juergen Homann, 67, also was fined $60,000 and ordered to perform 300 hours of community service by U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler in Newark, New Jersey, yesterday. Homann, who faced as long as five years in prison after he pleaded guilty Sept. 25, has helped prosecutors pursuing offshore tax evasion, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Marc Ferzan.</p>
<p>“His cooperation was very significant to the government,” Ferzan said in an interview.</p>
<p>Click link above for complete article.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/K3rMgwM8TlY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/07/ubs-client-who-hid-61-million-from-irs-avoids-jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/07/ubs-client-who-hid-61-million-from-irs-avoids-jail/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS to start regulating paid tax preparers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/5Nxd4aXsbtE/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/04/irs-to-start-regulating-paid-tax-preparers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tax preparer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service plans to start regulating paid tax preparers, requiring them to register with the government, pass competency tests and adhere to ethical standards&#8230;
Shulman said he hopes to have all paid tax preparers registered by the 2011 filing season. Preparers will be given about three years to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100104/ap_on_bi_ge/us_tax_preparers">Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press</a></p>
<p>WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service plans to start regulating paid tax preparers, requiring them to register with the government, pass competency tests and adhere to ethical standards&#8230;</p>
<p>Shulman said he hopes to have all paid tax preparers registered by the 2011 filing season. Preparers will be given about three years to meet competency requirements.</p>
<p>Click link above for complete article.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/5Nxd4aXsbtE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/04/irs-to-start-regulating-paid-tax-preparers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2010/01/04/irs-to-start-regulating-paid-tax-preparers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S., Italy launch tax accord after decade delay</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/HqVX2GRXiTc/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2009/12/17/us-italy-launch-tax-accord-after-decade-delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Treaty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Reuters.com
The U.S. Treasury on Wednesday announced the activation of a long-delayed income tax treaty with Italy that will reduce taxes on U.S. businesses operating in Italy.
The treaty was ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1999, but was not ratified by Italy&#8217;s parliament until March 2009. It will largely be effective for taxable years starting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1615089820091217">Reuters.com</a></p>
<p>The U.S. Treasury on Wednesday announced the activation of a long-delayed income tax treaty with Italy that will reduce taxes on U.S. businesses operating in Italy.</p>
<p>The treaty was ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1999, but was not ratified by Italy&#8217;s parliament until March 2009. It will largely be effective for taxable years starting Jan. 1, applying to taxes withheld at source on Feb. 1.</p>
<p>Click link above for complete article.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/HqVX2GRXiTc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2009/12/17/us-italy-launch-tax-accord-after-decade-delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2009/12/17/us-italy-launch-tax-accord-after-decade-delay/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FBAR: Foreign Land and Artwork</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~3/D87jJVQrers/</link>
		<comments>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2009/12/09/fbar-foreign-land-and-artwork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FBAR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[voluntary disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/24/09, the IRS updated their Voluntary Disclosure FAQ clarifying the FBAR reporting requirements for foreign land and artwork owned in the taxpayer&#8217;s own name.
 
In FAQ #37, the IRS confirmed that the FBAR filing for foreign land and artwork owned in the taxpayer&#8217;s own name, is due once the asset becomes income-producing (i.e., yields current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/24/09, the IRS updated their Voluntary Disclosure FAQ clarifying the FBAR reporting requirements for foreign land and artwork owned in the taxpayer&#8217;s own name.<br />
 <br />
In FAQ #37, the IRS confirmed that the FBAR filing for foreign land and artwork owned in the taxpayer&#8217;s own name, is due once the asset becomes income-producing (i.e., yields current income, or gain from the sale).</p>
<p>If the foreign land/artwork is held in an entity, the taxpayer is required to file tax information returns (Trust: Form 3520) (Corporation: Form 5471).</p>
<p>Re: FAQ 20 A taxpayer owns valuable land and artwork located in a foreign jurisdiction. This property produces no income and there were no reporting requirements regarding this property. Must the taxpayer report the land and artwork and pay a 20 percent penalty?</p>
<p>FAQ 20 relates to income producing property for which no income was reported. Under those circumstances, no distinction is made between assets held directly and assets held through an entity in computing the 20 percent offshore penalty. However, if the taxpayer owns nonincome producing property in the taxpayer&#8217;s own name, there has been no U.S. taxable event and no reporting obligation to disclose. The taxpayer will be required to report any current income from the property or gain from its sale or other disposition at such time in the future as the income is realized. Because there has as yet been no tax noncompliance, the 20 percent offshore penalty would not apply to those assets. If the foreign assets were held in the name of an entity such as a trust or corporation, there would have been an information return filing obligation that may need to be disclosed.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IRSTaxAuditNews/~4/D87jJVQrers" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2009/12/09/fbar-foreign-land-and-artwork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gswlaw.com/irsblog/2009/12/09/fbar-foreign-land-and-artwork/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
