Ignore History ?

King Edwin and his Conversion to Christianity

2010-09-20T09:14:00.001-07:00

The continuation of the history of my home, The ancient Kingdom and modern region of England called Northumbria

When Aethelfrith died, Edwin, the son of Aelle and prince of Deira seized the kingdom of Northumbrian . A Deiran was now in charge of the Northumbrian kingdom, but the rivalry between Deiran and Bernician factions was still there. The claimant for the Bernician's was Aethelfrith's son Prince Oswald, who fled from Northumbria for safety. He had taken refuge on the island monastery of Iona off the west coast of Scotland . If and Anglo-Saxon King wanted to gain support and respect, it was essential that he had victories in battle as well as political expansion . T his was as true for Edwin as it had beeen for Aethelfrith.

The Celtic influence was still strong on the southern borders of Northumbria, consequently, lot of Edwin's early military activity seems to have been concentrated there. He evicted a client king called Ceretic from the ancient British kingdom of Elmet near Leeds, this was about 626. He then followed this with the capture of Meicen (Hatfield), a Celtic kingdom ( near Doncaster). He also extended south into the Anglian kingdom of Lindsey (Lincolnshire).

Edwin already had control over much of the land acquired by Aethelfrith, consequently, Edwin's power in the north was unequalled by any of his Anglian predecessors. However,his power and expansion naturally aroused jealousy and fear amongst rivals including Cuichelm, King of the West Saxons. The consequence of this jealousy was that in 626 Cuichelm sent an assassin north. The assassin was called Eumer, attempted to kill Edwin as he celebrated the pagan festival of Easter at his palace, which is thought to be situated somewhere close to the River Derwent on the edge of the Yorkshire wolds. Eumer, the assassin entered Edwin's court and asked to speak with him. He said he bhad an important message from the West Saxon King. When he was presented to King Edwin, Eumer produced a poisoned dagger from beneath his cloak and attempted to stab Edwin with it. Fortunately one of Edwin's men, who's name was Lillam, jumped in the way and took the blow which killed him. Edwin was injured in the fight which followed, but Eumer was eventually put to death. On the same night attempt on his life, Queen Ethelburga, King Edwin's wife, gave birth. Angered by the assasination attempt, Edwin sought revenge and defeated the West Saxons in a great battle in Wessex. This resulted in Edwin proclaiming himself 'overking' of all England.

EDWIN'S CONVERSION TO CHRISTIANITY

Up to this point in time, all the kings of Northumbria , including Edwin, had been pagan , this was however, about to change. Edwin had already formed an important alliance with the Kingdom of Kent. Kent was an Anglo-Saxon Kingdom that St Augustine, and his influence, had managed to converted to Christianity . A marriage had been arranged in 625, between Edwin and the Christian Princess of Kent called Ethelberga. At that time Edwin was already considering his own conversion to Christianity and he took the opportunity to claim that his victory in Wessex was due to his new Christian faith.

On April 11 627, Edwin converted to Christianity, and was baptized at York. The baptism was performed by Paulinus, a Roman missionary . The ceremony took place in the new, wooden church dedicated to St Peter. This humble little wooden building was the foundation of the present York Minster. Edwin's Pagan high priest Coifi,, followed the king's example and also converted to Christianity. Coifi destroyed the great heathen temple of Goodmanham near the River Derwent, to demonstrate his new faith. Goodmanham was in what is now East Yorkshire.

Though the title and position of "Bishop of York" had not been used since the time of Roman rule, Paulinus was appointed to that position. Paulinus travelled throughout Northumbria converting the people, particularly in those areas associated with the Royal household. He reputed to have baptised thousands people near Catterick , in the Swale, and in the River Glen near Yeavering.

Though it t is only visible from the air, the outline of one of Edwin's Palaces can still be seen in the fields at Yeavering. The outline of several buildings including an auditorium and a great hall can clearly be seen. It is thought that the people of the area assembled here to hear the words of influential speakers such as Edwin and Paulinus. The palace lies at the foot of a prominent hill called Yeavering Bell, which is also the site of a large Celtic fort. This may be one of the areas where the Celtic and Anglian cultures merged together.

Though tempting as it is to look for the continuous presence of Christianity in the region since Roman times. It may be significant that York was chosen by Edwin as the centre for his Christian activity because it was so closely associated with the great Christian Emperor Constantine as well as being the site of a Roman bishopric. Edwin's new wooden minster was built within what had been Yorks headquarters building, of the Roman legionary fortress. The church of St Peter's was rebuilt in 628 AD by Edwin. He built his new church in stone, and may even have used rubble from the Roman fortess in its construction. The Anglo-Saxon certainly made use of Roman stone in the building of their churches. This can be seen at the Anglo-Saxon church at Escomb in County Durham. It is also known for certain, that the minster at York is dedicated to St Peter, and was chosen to reflect its links with St Peter's in Rome. The church was given sealed approval by the Pope.

Though Roman Christianity was now re-established in the north. Its future was not secure and would only be assured as long as Edwin remained in power. Edwin was killed on October 12, 633. As with Aethelfrith, Edwin' died during a battle on the marshy low country near Doncaster. The battle was at Heathfield (or Hatfield). Edwin's forces were crushed by the Mercians who were alliance with the Welsh. The Mercians fought under a chieftain called Penda. The Welsh assisted under the their king Caedwalla. Osric, who was a possible successor to Edwin, was also killed in the battle. Edwin's son Edfrith surrendered.

The Mercians appointed Penda as their King, His Welsh ally Caedwalla, could now claim to be one of the most powerful kings in the north. Caedwalla claimed the throne of Deira, he also had his eye on Northumbrian territory. It is not so strange that a Welshman would claim Anglian territory in Yorkshire, as many parts of the region still encompassed Welsh speaking territory particularly in the Pennines and in the old Celtic kingdoms near Leeds and Doncaster.

In Bernicia, Eanfrith, the son of Aethelfrith, who was a pagan, was crowned King of the Northumbrians. Those people who had converted to Christianity during the reign of Edwin, may have thought it wise to revert to Eanfrith's Pagan ways. The Christian Bishop of York, St Paulinus, returned to Kent.

--
Malcolm

malcolm.shoestringmall.com

king Aethelfrith

2010-09-18T03:09:00.001-07:00

In the North-East of England, Aethelfrith, the grandson of Ida the Flamebearer, became the new King of Bernicia in 593. His power seemed assured, even in the Celtic regions. Aethelfrith's men heavily defeated the native Britons in a great battle at Catterick in 598 . It was here that the ancient British kingdom called Catraeth was situated, on the rivers Tees and Swale. After assembling at Edinburgh, a huge army of Britons, included the people of Gododdin, Rheged and Northern Wales. marched to Catterick. It was as if the Britons were engaging in a last stand against the Anglo-Saxons. But they were heavily defeated by Aethelfrith. The kingdom of Catraeth was seized.

Aethelfrith's power was now beyond dispute and the Celts were forced to accept his rule. That did not mean however, that large areas of the north became Anglo-Saxon overnight. The settlements of Anglo-Saxons were extensive, but Celts were still dominant in Cumbria, the Pennines, and in the Celtic Kingdoms of Elmet and Meicen (in Hatfield, the marshy country near Doncaster) as well as Loidis (Leeds) .

Aethelfrith turned his attention to the Celts of the far north in 603 , going into battle with Aidan MacGabrain, King of the Dalriada Scots. The Dalriada Scots lived in western Caledonia but had originated from Ireland (Hibernia). During the battle, the Scots were assisted by a large force of Ulstermen, but were defeated in battle at Degastan, though the precise location is unknown, it is thought to be possibly in Liddesdale. Aethelfrith's victory resulted in the Kingdoms of Strathclyde in the west, Rheged in Cumbria and Gododdin in the Lothians being forced to recognise Bernician superiority again. His power and prestige assured, Aethelfrith seized the crown of Deira in Yorkshire. This resulted in him becoming King of both Deira and Bernicia, this united all the Angle territory north of the River Humber into one kingdom called Northumbria. Bernicia and Deira were reduced to mere sub kingdoms.

Many in Deira disliked Bernician rule, so Aethelfrith encouraged Deiran support by marrying Acha, a member of the Deiran royal family. The marriage did not stop Acha's brother Edwin from claiming the kingdom of Deira but it was too dangerous for Edwin to stay in Northumbria so he sought protection at the court of King Cearl of Mercia (an Angle kingdom based in the Midlands). Edwin's presence in Mercia was a constant threat to Aethelfrith.

In 615, the Bernician capital Din Guyardi, was renamed Bebbanburgh in honour of Bebba, Aethelfrith's new wife. The name meant the fort of Bebba, but it would gradually come to be pronounced Bamburgh. This was perhaps one of many Celtic place names that were replaced by Anglo-Saxon names in this period and may reflect the gradual replacement of Celtic with Anglo-Saxon speech. It seemed that the native Celts were no longer the major threat to the expansion of the Angles and Aethelfrith for one was now preoccupied with defeating his Anglian rival.

Later in 615 AD, Aethelfrith ousted King Cearl from the Kingdom of Mercia and took control of the midland kingdom, he did however, employ a Mercian to look after Northumbrian interests here. Aethefrith's major Northumbria rival, Edwin, fled from Mercia and took refuge with the King of East Anglia. Though Edwin was still a threat to Aethelfrith, he probably seemed a more distant one. It seemed there would be no end to Aethelfrith's expansion. Aethelfrith defeated the Welsh in 615, in battle at Chester and again seized Cumbria, bringing it firmly under Northumbria rule. The event was significant as it isolated the Britons of North Wales from those of Strathclyde and the Lothians, although that is not to say that the Britons were exterminated in the District of the Lakes.

Aethelfrith's expansion would not remain unchecked forever. He finally met his end in 616, in battle, against Raedwald King of East Anglia at Bawtry on the River Idle. The site lies close to the present borders of Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire. In Aethelfrith's time this area lay on the southern reaches of Northumbria. It was a dangerous marshy region close to the border with Lindsey and easily accessible from the East Anglian kingdom.

malcolm.shoestringmall.com

DEIRA AND BERNICIA

2010-09-07T22:57:00.001-07:00

Probably the most important date in this period of history in the North East ,was 547 AD, when Din Guyaroi (Bamburgh) on the North East coast was seized by the Angle chief called Ida the Flamebearer. Even then, this was an ancient fortress, His capture of this important British stronghold was important to the Angles' political and military seizure of the North. It is is a year which is widely regarded as the first date in history of the kingdom that would become known as Northumbria. It is probable that Ida already controlled an area in the Tyne, Wear and Tees region. But the more populated lands held by the British, to the north, in the vicinity of Bamburgh (Din Guyardi), were to become important additions to Ida's Kingdom of Bernicia, a kingdom that was expanding.

The name Bernicia, was like Deira, probably an corruption of an existing Celtic name and would come to be synonymous with the region of the North East in the centuries to come.

Huge areas of the North East had been conquered by Ida. By 550 this included some territory south of the Tees. Ida was now the undisputed and most powerful leader in the northern Angle Land (later England) and Bamburgh or (Din Guyardi) was the capital . Ida was succeeded by his son Theodoric, In 560 . His domain was confined to Bernicia, north of the Tees. However, some of the remaining Celtic kingdoms in the north, saw Theodoric as a weaker leader than his father and would to accept his rule.

Meanwhile, in the Yorkshire Wolds (known as Deira to the Angles) Aelle, an Anglian chief was rising to power and leading his people against the native Britons. Aelle is often regarded as the first king of Deira. Rivalry between the two kingdoms of Deira and Bernicia would be a long running, and would feature in Anglo-Saxon history in the north for many years. The native Celts however, were still not completely subdued. Urien, the king of the of Rheged , a British kingdom based in Cumbria, was determined to fight for the Celtic cause. , He besieged King Theodoric of Bernicia on the island of LindisfarneIn 575 AD. The siege that lasted three days, but victory could not be claimed.

,Due to the close proximity of the island of Lindisfarne to the Bernician capital of Bamburgh, it seems to have been important as a location for the early battles between Britons and Angles in the North. Not much is known of this period but, Urien of Rheged would meet his end fighting against the Anglo-Saxons on Lindisfarne in 590 AD. It is thought that Morgan, a leader of the Goddodin tribe from north of the Tweed betrayed him

http://www.bamburghcastle.com/

--
Malcolm

malcolm.pickering@gmail.com

malcolm.shoestringmall.com

Rome's departure from Britain

2010-08-29T11:59:00.000-07:00

I have done enough about the Roman history of the area of which I live and think it is now time to move on a little to the so called "Dark Ages". First we have to give a little background into how the North East became subject to the Anglo-Saxons.

For three and a half centuries Britain was under Roman rule. The Romans built roads, towns, forts and temples, bringing with them soldiers and cultures from across Europe. They had conquered the native 'Celtic' tribes of Britain and established military control in the North with the construction of Hadrian's Wall and the huge legionary fortress at York. In the reign of Constantine the Great, they also brought Christianity. Constantine, who was proclaimed Emperor at no less a place than York, would himself become the first Emperor to convert to Christianity.

By 314 York was one of a number of important places in the Roman empire with a Christian bishop. Christianity however
was , only one of a number of religions accepted within the Roman empire and it is not known how many Britons were actually Christians. The native people of Britain were ancient Britons, speaking a Celtic language resembling Welsh, but of course many would also learn to speak the Latin of the Romans. Many of these people continued to practice their native Celtic 'pagan' religions, while others may have adopted more exotic religions introduced from other parts of the Roman empire. One thing is certain however, in 300 years of occupation the Britons had intermixed with the multicultural Romans to form a 'Romano-British' society, quite different from the Celtic culture of pre-Roman times.

In the areas around the Roman forts, native Britons intermarried with Roman soldiers enlisted from far flung corners of the Roman empire like Iraq or North Africa. At Housesteads on the Roman Wall, they may even have intermarried with members of the Roman garrison of Anglo-Saxon soldiers stationed at that fort. But we should remember that these Anglo-Saxons were not yet native to Britain and came from the Germanic lands of the continent.

By 399 AD, three and half centuries of Roman rule in Britain were drawing to an end as the Romans commenced the removal of their troops from Britain. Attacks on Rome by the Visigoths from eastern Europe meant that reinforcements were desperately needed elsewhere and the Romans could no longer hold on to Britain as a military province. In the North of Britain, the depletion of the Roman army left the northern frontier of Hadrian's Wall severely exposed and revolts against the small scattering of Romans who remained soon gained momentum.

The Romans left a vacuum when they left Britain. The North East of England was ravaged by raids from Scandinavia and Germany. The people did try to hold on to the ideas and the culture that Rome had bequeathed. The attacks from over the North Sea and from North of Hadrian's Wall became stronger and with greater numbers, and as the attackers began to stay, the legacy of Rome began to fade. A new culture was taking strength, it was the culture of the "Norse" people. The invaders did not totally disregard what had gone before, instead they assimilated themselves into the area and the people. The Anglo-Saxon period covers roughly from 450AD to 866AD

By 410AD the Roman troops had virtually left Britain, leaving her borders and shores defenceless. The North East was particularly vulnerable to attack from over the North Sea by raids from th Anglo -Saxons and from north of Hadrian's Wall by the Picts and Scots. The Angles, who were also known as Anglians , came from the border area between Denmark and Germany, while the Saxons came from Northern Germany.

During the later years Rome's occupation, they built several defensive watch towers along the coast to defend against the Anglo-Saxon raiders. In the North East, examples could be found at Scarborough, Goldsborough, Filey and Saltburn, but there were almost certainly others. When Roman rule came to an end the Anglo-Saxons continued to raid the coast but some however, were employed by the native Britions as mercenaries to defend Britain against attacks from the northern side of Hadrian's Wall by the Scots and Picts. In return for their protection the Anglo-Saxons were given land in Britain , but it became increasingly obvious to the new settlers, that Britain was now a vulnerable province that was like a ripe apple, waiting to be plucked, and pluck it they did.

The Angles began to invade and settle in all parts of the eastern shores of England, seizing the area they called East Anglia by 440, along with Lincolnshire and other areas further inland. It is likely that the North East was already under attack or at least bracing itself for invasion, but some aspects of the Roman way of life still persisted. It is known, for example, that in 445 AD, Newcastle upon Tyne was still known by its Roman name of Pons Aelius - the site of a fort adjoining a bridge over the Tyne.

By 450 AD, the Angles had begun their invasion of the north, colonising land in the Yorkshire Wolds, just to the north of the Humber in a land they called Deira. This name was probably an adapatation of an exisiting Celtic tribal region or kingdom. Gradually the Angles would invade territory further north and began settling the lowland river valleys of the east coast including possibly the Tyne, Wear and Tees. Excavations at Norton on Teesside, have revealed evidence of Anglo-Saxon settlement in this early period. It is also possible that one group of Angles from Lincolnshire - a region then known as Lindis feorna (later Lindsey) colonised and named the island we know today as Lindisfarne. Lindisfarne was certainly known in early times as Lindis feorna.

The early Anglo-Saxon period was probably n an age of war and upheaval and our knowledge of this period is scanty. It is this early age of Anglo-Saxon invasion that is often associated with King Arthur, a Briton who is said to have fought against the Anglo-Saxons. He is reputed to have died in 537, perhaps on the Roman Wall, but little can be said of Arthur, since so little is known. He may not have existed at all. To give too much attention to a shadowy figure like Arthur, himself largely a creation of later Medieval writers would give a distorted and unreliable view of Anglo-Saxon history

Our limited knowledge of this early period has led to the term 'Dark Ages' but it would be wrong to apply this term to the whole Anglo-Saxon age, as the Anglo-Saxon period is in fact a time about which we know a great deal. However, in the earliest period of Anglo-Saxon history it is very much a case for the gradual emergence of history from darkness.

One important clue to the early settlement of Anglo-Saxons is in place names, as most of the place names of our region and indeed of England as a whole, are of Anglo-Saxon origin and often tell us the names and activities of the first Anglo-Saxon settlers. Significantly, almost all places ending in 'ton' or 'ham' are of Anglo-Saxon origin, Washington is an example of that , The name comes from the local Anglo Saxon chief 'Hwaes', whose family 'Inga' had an estate 'Tun' there — 'Hwaesingatun'.

but there are many other types of Anglo-Saxon place names. Suprisingly the original Celtic and Romano-Celtic places names are very rare in England.

Roman Newcastle (Pons Aelius)

2010-08-22T11:54:00.000-07:00

Newcastle upon Tyne in North East England can trace its history back to Roman times. During that period, the Fort that was built there was to protect the bridge crossing over the River Tyne.This is how Pons Aelius is thought to have looked

The fort was named Pons Aelius. Pons was the Lain word for Bridge, Aulius was the family name of the Emperor Hadrian , He also gave his name to the Roman wall, which stretches from Newcastle to Carlisle and was the northern most outpost of the Roman Empire.

The Roman bridge at Newcastle was built of timber on stone piers and may have continued in use for many centuries. Records suggest that the bridge may still have stood in Norman times and if this is so then it was not finally destroyed until 1248 during a raging fire. It is highly likely that a medieval bridge which replaced this burned structure still utilised the Roman foundations.
The Roman bridge at Newcastle was built of timber on stone piers and may have continued in use for many centuries. Records suggest that the bridge may still have stood in Norman times and if this is so then it was not finally destroyed until 1248 during a raging fire. It is highly likely that a medieval bridge which replaced this burned structure still utilized the Roman foundations.

A little way to the west, built as part of the Roman wall was the Fort of Condercum. This is now Benwell part of the modern city of Newcastle. The modern name "Benwell" is of Anglo-Saxon origin coming from the words Beonnam-wall, this means "a place within the wall". Today most of what remains of the fort at Benwell is largely buried beneath modern housing, but the defensive Roman ditch called the `Vallum' can still be clearly be seen along with the nearby ruins of a Roman temple dedicated to a local god called Antenociticus.

From Benwell the Roman wall continued east, towards the fort near the river at Newcastle called Pons Aelius. Between Benwell and Newcastle City Center. Hadrian's Wall more or less ran along the course of what is now the Westgate Road. This road is built along the site of a Roman defensive ditch situated just north of Hadrian's Wall.
. The Roman Wall runs across northern England from Newcastle to Carlisle

Initially the Roman bridge and fort at Newcastle formed the eastern end of Hadrian's Wall but later the wall was extended three miles further to the east where a fort called Segedunum was built at what we now know as the modern suburb of Wallsend. Segedunum was strategically located at the point where a short northward flowing section of the River Tyne suddenly turns east towards the sea. East of here the Tyne provided a natural continuation of Roman defences. This is demonstrated by the fact that one of the defensive walls of Wallsend fort actually extended into the River Tyne itself.

This is the reconstructed bath house and museum in

Segedunum

Segedunum Roman Fort and Arbia Fort North and South Tyneside

2010-08-20T08:40:00.001-07:00

Segedunum Roman Fort is on the banks of the River Tyne, in the modern town of Wallsend, so called because it is at the eastern end of Hadrian's Wall.

In AD122 the Emperor Hadrian ordered a mighty frontier system to be built across Britain to defend the Roman Empire from the barbarians to the North.

The result was Hadrian's Wall, a 73 mile barrier stretching from the River Tyne in the east to the Solway Firth in the west. Segedunum, which means strong Fort, stood at the eastern end of the Wall and was home to 600 Roman soldiers. For almost 300 years Segedunum guarded this important part of the frontier.

Today, Segedunum is once again the gateway to Hadrian's Wall. It is the most excavated Fort along the Wall and has a large interactive museum plus a 35 metre high viewing tower providing outstanding views across this World Heritage Site.

Segedunum Roman Fort, Baths & Museum is managed by Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums on behalf of North Tyneside Council.

A metro Train can be taken to cross the River Tyne to South Shields , to visit the Roman Fort of Arbeia. The metro is a good way to see Tyne and Wear as it is integrated to the local bus and main line train service.

In the early 4th century, a troop of boatmen were transferred from one end of the Roman Empire to the other. Abandoning the warmth of the River Tigris, they found themselves enjoying the delights of South Shields, a supply fort at the eastern end of Hadrian's Wall.

They no doubt noticed a number of changes. One in particular soon impinged on their consciousness: the climate of South Shields is not quite as warm as that on the Tigris. The commandant therefore set about building himself a new house which incorporated a number of heating devices. Furthermore he also decided to emphasise that he was a Roman, and not a barbarian, so he therefore determined to impress the barbaric 'Britunculi' with what is perhaps the finest fully excavated example of a commanding officer's house in Roman Britain, and the best understood classical house plan.

On the North East coast of England lies Arbeia, the Roman fort at South Shields. It lies just beyond the end of Hadrian's Wall, and served as the supply depot to the Wall. This photo shows the rows of granaries in which supplies were stored, with the recently reconstructed gatehouse beyond.

The house was not at the centre of the fort as is normal, but is tucked away at the south eastern corner - rather a long way away from the headquarters building in the centre of the fort; but then who wants to live on top of the office? Thanks to the excavations directed by Paul Bidwell and Nicholas Hodgson for the Tyne and Wear Museums, it is now possible to conduct a guided tour of the house.

Plan of the Commandants House. Entrance to the left (room 231) with bathhouse adjacent.

The entrance was to the west, through an elaborate aisled hall which might even be called an 'atrium', Room 21. In the corner the doorkeeper sat in Room 22, while adjacent in Room 23 was a small heated office where the less important visitors would be interviewed. At the centre of the atrium was a stone-lined pit that may have been a strong-box for the safe-keeping of valuables.We then pass through into the centre courtyard - very Roman in style, though there is a veranda only along two sides. To our left are the private apartments. Rooms 3, 4, 5, and 6 form a suite with doors leading through one to the other: the two end rooms 5 and 6 had central heating.Then at the far end of the courtyard was the piece de resistance - the triclinium or dining room (room 7). This was where the commander dined with his guests: at the far end, the classical arrangement of couches set around three sides were marked out by flagstones. It shows how even in the 4th century the commander of the Tigris boatmen was determined to maintain proper civilised Roman standards and to recline and loll about at his meals and not do as barbarians do, and sit up straight.

There was however one little problem: it was unheated, and in the winter it became a little cold (and probably in spring and autumn too). They therefore built a more intimate winter dining room adjacent in Room 12 which was smaller, but properly heated. The rooms between the two, 8 9 and 11 were presumably the kitchens - note the back door leading out to the intervallum street. Continuing round, Room 13 was a store room from which the hypocaust was fired: there was also a latrine in the corner. Adjacent, room 14 had a rough metalled floor, and drains, and was probably therefore a stable. Then coming back to the west end of the house there was a small but luxurious set of baths set adjacent to the entrance. Here at the far extremity of the Roman Empire the Tigris boatmen could behave like proper Roman gentlemen.

Plan of the 4th century fort at South Shields. At the top is a row of barracks, originally granaries.In the centre is the Headquarters building, the 'Principia' with the forecourt granary adjacent.Then comes another row of barracks, and at the bottom is the 'Courtyard House'.

The excavations at South Shields have continued to give surprises. The first stone fort was built around 160 as a conventional fort. However around 200 everything was reorganised and it became a supply base. A dividing wall was built across the middle and in the northern half all the barracks were pulled down and replaced by granaries. However around 230 AD it was re-organised yet again. In the northern half even the headquarters building was now replaced by a couple of granaries and a new mini-headquarters building was erected in the southern quadrant. This lasted to around 300 AD when it was all burnt down - accidental fire or enemy attack? And the new luxurious house was then laid out.

Underneath the barracks there have been further surprises. The most unexpected was the discovery of the parade ground of the very first fort of all. This is a large area of cobbles, all beautifully laid. The Roman soldiers clearly took their drill very seriously.

The Roman parade ground at Arbeia. Note the elaborate division down the centre, dividing it into quadrants.

Sealed beneath the parade ground was an even greater surprise, a well preserved Iron Age roundhouse which makes a satisfyingly long sequence of occupation on the site.

Buckingham Palace Garden Party

2010-08-18T22:22:00.000-07:00

During the last few months I have been on extended sick leave. This is due to the ongoing problem I have with the right knee. The problem was originally caused by an argument with a taxi in Lisbon. The Taxi won, and I was repatriated back to the UK and The Royal Naval Hospital "Haslar" in Gosport where I spent about a year between 1988 and 1989. The QARNNS, (The Queen Alexanders Royal Navy Nursing Service) and the Naval Surgeons saved the leg but the accident has left me with leg problems that will follow me for the rest of my life. Perhaps it would have been easier just to get in the taxi. The good thing about the extended sick leave is that I am having to rethink the way my life is going. Though I only have about six years left before retirement (unless that get changed as well due to the inheritance left to the Nation).

While on this sick leave I did have an invitation to attend the Buckingham Palace Garden Party. As you can imagine, I was rather cock-a-hoop. I arrived at the Mall for 1500hrs on the 22nd of June, as I stood in line, waiting to get in with the other guests, a Policeman told me to go to the gates and see his "mate". As I was in uniform I was allowed to go into the Palace early. I did as I was told. I was ushered through the arch under the balcony that the Royal Family uses for big occasions, and into the courtyard that is usually only seen on tv. We were then shown up the stairs by liveried staff to the main entrance and through the marble hall, passing paintings and other antiques as I sank into the carpet. We were then ushered through the Garden Room (originally built as a Library but never used as such) I took time to look at the antique ceramic services in the wall cases around the room before passing through the door and onto the terrace.

The Garden Parties at the Palace were a concept of Queen Victoria in the 1860s The format has changed little , people still dress in formal clothes, Men and women in Dress Uniform or Morning Clothes and day dresses or gowns. Some of The Clergy dress in frock coats and top hats. The Military bands play nonstop music . It is a day that is remembered for the rest of their lives,by those who attend. It is also a way that the Monarch can say "thank you" to those who may never get any other form of formal recognition in the way of an Honour.