<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>iMedia Trends</title><description>Where Old and New Media Converge</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>79</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ImediaTrends" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="imediatrends" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3007449734817762847</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-29T17:30:07.758-04:00</atom:updated><title>Newspapers Are In Trouble, But Radio Isn't!</title><description>I can't believe how radio gets lumped in with newspapers and television in discussions about how old media is not longer able to sustain their business models.  Newspapers are in trouble.  All you have to do is follow the news the past few months to see what is happening to this once robust industry.  But is radio facing the same troubled fate? &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;That's easy, No!&lt;/span&gt; The problems radio faces are not even close to what newspapers and television face.  Let's look at the facts:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Newspapers are expensive to run.&lt;/span&gt;  That bit of news is not a revelation to any one. Newspapers involve printing presses that cost millions, paper and ink are consumed in huge volumes and the price of these commodities changes daily.  Pressmen, delivery trucks, truck drivers, and the trusty paperboy are all still a part of the chain.  And that doesn't include writers, editors, photographers, and all of the support behind the scenes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Newspapers have four sources of income and ALL are down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;subscriptions are down&lt;/span&gt;.  Young people are not subscribing as their parents did and many older folks, who have discovered their favorite newspapers on the Internet, have dropped their subscriptions.  And they often compete in their same markets with weekly free newspapers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;news stand and news box sales are down&lt;/span&gt;.  I can't believe the number of times I went to purchase a paper from a machine, not  having three quarters in my pocket.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Third, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;classified advertising is down over 50% in many markets&lt;/span&gt;.  Web sites like Craig's List have made classified ads FREE on the web.  Other web sites like Autos.com, Cars.com, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;AutoTrader&lt;/span&gt;.com, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;CarSoup&lt;/span&gt;.com have taken a big bite out of the automotive classified sections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;CareerBuilder&lt;/span&gt;.com and Monster.com have cut into employment advertising, in addition to a number of regional employment sites. And even obituaries have been hurt by national sites like legacy.com and free on-line obit services in many smaller markets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And added to that, real estate brokers and agents, huge print advertisers, are not spending large amounts since the beginning of the housing crisis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And forth,&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; display advertising is down 28%&lt;/span&gt;. Not a pretty picture as any one can agree.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How does radio compare?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Radio stations are not expensive to run.&lt;/span&gt;  As a matter of fact, they are fixed expense businesses with towers, transmitters, antennas, and studio equipment that is probably paid for and payrolls that don't include all of the staff necessary to deliver the newspaper.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Newspapers have subscribers but &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;radio is and has always been FREE!&lt;/span&gt;  Radios are ubiquitous.  They are readily available, and are included in other purchases like cars, clock radios, and CD players.  Every one has access to several and they are free to use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Newspapers lost classifieds, radio never had them&lt;/span&gt;.  Newspapers lost subscribers, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;radio listening is down only slightly, and still is heard by over 90% of the population each week&lt;/span&gt;.  And while display advertising is down 28%, spot radio advertising is down, but not as a result of the business model being outdated, but simple down because of the economy and down as a result of automotive advertising being off substantially.  But radios non-traditional revenue is up, and it's &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Internet&lt;/span&gt; revenue is up, as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure, spot radio is &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;interrruptive&lt;/span&gt; advertising.  But it is advertising that listeners have come to expect as the small price to pay for this free, readily available service.  Television, satellite radio, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;ipods&lt;/span&gt;, mp3 players, all have found a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;niche&lt;/span&gt;, but not at the expense of radio!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is the radio model changing?  Sure it is.  But it is changing slowly, and as it does radio has begun to embrace both non-traditional revenues (events etc.) and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Internet&lt;/span&gt; sales, streaming, and using micro-sites, landing pages, and the synergy of moving listeners to their web products as a way to evolve radio's business model.  As spot sales decline, these new categories will fill in and a new model will emerge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Television has it's own problems.  Television stations are expensive to operate.  Programming is expensive to create and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Tivo&lt;/span&gt; and Digital recording devices have made it easier to fast forward past the commercials for content.  But radio doesn't have these problems.  No one is fast forwarding past the commercials.  You might argue that listeners can change the channel, but they have always been able to do that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Radio is changing to be sure.  But, unlike newspapers and television, our model still works, evolving to be sure, and radio might emerge from the recession a smaller business, but the radio model is still healthy as long as we realize that it is changing and embrace other revenue streams like the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Internet&lt;/span&gt; to keep us moving forward.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do you think?  I'd love to hear your comments.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3007449734817762847?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/03/newspapers-are-in-trouble-but-radio.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-303455357454900879</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-18T09:00:00.779-04:00</atom:updated><title>Radio's Uncertain Future</title><description>We are experiencing a fundamental change in the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Radio revenues will continue their decline until 2013&lt;/span&gt;. At that point revenues will again begin to increase but we will be a smaller industry and a return to the 2003 billing levels is far into the future, if ever.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rate integrity is an outdated idea&lt;/span&gt;. We will have to make rate concessions to retain advertisers. A failure to do so will result in them going elsewhere (not radio) and they will not return.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Advertisers will be slower to pay&lt;/span&gt;. The net 30 will become 60 and    advertisers (like Budweiser) will want us to extend credit to 120+ days. We take the deal or we will be eliminated from their ad schedules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Advertisers will demand more and more accountability&lt;/span&gt; in our        ability to provide a measurable return on investment. Value will become the   strategy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Barter will again be a way of doing business&lt;/span&gt;.  In tough times many people are willing to barter their services in return for advertising schedules.  Where we can do so and cut cash expenditures, it might make sense.  Remember the half cash/half trade deals from past recessions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Bad debt write-offs will increase&lt;/span&gt;. There is no way around it, if we extend credit past 60 days, some advertisers will not pay or worst yet will go out of business. We will simply write off more bad debt. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What can we do?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, we must recognize that this fundamental change in the media business will present opportunities for those companies willing to embrace the change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We must think of ourselves as being in the media business, NOT the radio business. We must begin to think web first, then radio. As a result, we need to:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Make the web part of EVERY advertising schedule&lt;/span&gt;. The web gives radio the opportunity to have a visual component for the first time. This opens up new categories of advertisers like real estate, retail medical, and others.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Use landing pages,&lt;/span&gt; jump pages, squeeze pages and micro sites as a means of bringing a visual component to out advertising and giving more value and better accountability to our clients.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;We can no longer retreat to selling spots&lt;/span&gt; with the mistaken thinking that this is our core business and this will get us through the storm.  That’s exactly what Kodak did.  When the world was switching to digital photography, they stuck to their core business and invested in better film.  Now Kodak is playing catch-up in a crowded market they once dominated.  They should have been the leader in the digital photography transformation, but the stuck to their guns and did what they always did.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"&gt;“If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4.  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;We must embrace the Internet&lt;/span&gt;; we must spend most of our training time and training money on developing the Internet “brands” of each of our products. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;“We must not expect success BEFORE we have made the investment!  We must invest, then implement, before we can ever expect success.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;“R.O.I. no longer means return on investment, it means Risk of Inaction!”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The natural tendency when things are bad is to retreat to what you know.  That strategy worked at one time.  It won’t work NOW!  We can’t afford to put a toe in the water of new media; we must jump in head first.  Remember:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;“A timid trapeze artist……is a DEAD trapeze artist!”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;We must hire web savvy employees in ALL departments&lt;/span&gt;.  Disk jockeys are as obsolete as 45’s.  We can no longer run our business hiring the same people to do the same jobs they once did.  The business has changed and so have the job classifications.  In the new media company that also does radio, the jobs we will be hiring for are web designer, IT specialists, code writers, database managers, and digital marketing specialists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;“Do you want to run your business or career as if; the past will last just a few more years?  Or, that the future will come faster than you think?”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From what I can see there are two distinct models of how radio will be operated in the future that are emerging.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;“the low cost, mostly generic, music-based, but higher margin station.” &lt;/span&gt; This is the model that the top broadcast companies seem to be embracing.  Formats that are somewhat generic (programming from one central location, say San Antonio), with a choice of a nationally syndicated morning show, and voice tracked jocks, usually national and generic, or regional, doing several stations a day in the region.  Their web sites will be national boilerplate with generic information linked together and sold as part of a larger ad network.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why this model? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First,&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; it IS cheaper to run&lt;/span&gt;.  It provides a bigger margin for investors of publicly held companies.  It helps when they are writing off millions in lost value and good will.  It works for a percentage of listeners who simply want music and little else, especially when a company has critical mass (five or six signals) in the marketplace.  And it can be run by out-of-towners, with little or no connection to the market they are serving.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And second: &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;“the high value, hyper local, content rich, news and information based, but lower margin station.”  &lt;/span&gt;This is the model that many smaller and local broadcasters are embracing.  The formats don’t rely as heavily on music elements, and what music that is played, is researched locally if possible.  These stations have a local morning show, with lots of local information, news, sports and community.  And they will be voiced tracked the remainder of the day by local voices, that do tracking as only a small part of their job, which is that of content creator.  Their web sites will be hyper-local; generally heavy on news, sports, format information, concerts, and local events.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why this model?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First,&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; it might be the only way to survive&lt;/span&gt; against the clusters owned by the big conglomerates.  It embraced the community, provides a resource for charities, local events, politics, news, and opinion.  Although there is a smaller margin of profit (where was it written that radio had to make 40 cents on a dollar), there is a huge increase in good will, loyalty, and “pillar of the community” status, that can’t be quantified. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;And it can only be done well locally&lt;/span&gt;.  Another future benefit comes when the music industry imposes a fee for artist royalties through Sound Exchange.  Although the industry is fighting the added fees, they will come.  It’s not a matter of if but when, and the future usually comes faster that we predict. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Which model is right? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, BOTH.  It really depends on the situation in each individual market, what your holdings are, what percentage of the market you control, and who are you competing with.  I can only offer this; that unless you’re the big dog, you will never out do the publicly held companies at the low cost higher margin model. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every broadcaster in America must decide which model they will follow and make that known, with complete transparency, to their entire organization from the president to the janitor. &lt;br /&gt;Why?  Because each model requires a different thought process.  The first is about cutting costs, consolidating formats, morning shows, and web sites.  They will bill less money that they once did, but they will maintain close to the margins that stockholders have come to expect. &lt;br /&gt;The second model requires building local content, hiring local content creators, and getting that information disseminated across all platforms, radio, web and cell phone in their market.  It will cost more, but their billing will be higher, and their margin smaller.  But these operators understand the good will that comes from serving the public’s interest, convenience and necessity, which, by the way, is what &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ALL &lt;/span&gt;licensed broadcasters are charged to do.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-303455357454900879?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/03/radios-uncertain-future_18.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-7655250504730620863</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-14T13:01:30.359-04:00</atom:updated><title>Rocky Mountain News Video</title><description>&lt;object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="400" height="225"&gt;&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3390739&amp;amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;amp;show_title=1&amp;amp;show_byline=1&amp;amp;show_portrait=0&amp;amp;color=ffffff&amp;amp;fullscreen=1"&gt;&lt;embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3390739&amp;amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;amp;show_title=1&amp;amp;show_byline=1&amp;amp;show_portrait=0&amp;amp;color=ffffff&amp;amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="225"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://vimeo.com/3390739"&gt;Final Edition&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href="http://vimeo.com/bluerogue"&gt;Matthew Roberts&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="http://vimeo.com/"&gt;Vimeo&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is the poignant video of the closing of the Rocky Mountain News in Denver.  This nearly 150 year old newspaper printed its last editions this past week.  The video shows the real drama of people loosing jobs in this age of new media.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How will our companies react.  Will we make the necessary changes before this happens.  It's worth a view.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-7655250504730620863?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/03/rocky-mountain-news-video.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-7813419371718465865</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-13T20:03:20.029-04:00</atom:updated><title>Many American's Wouldn't Care If Their Local Newspaper Folded</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SbrxsfUikBI/AAAAAAAAARs/1NaqFxM9lj4/s1600-h/1147-1.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 232px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SbrxsfUikBI/AAAAAAAAARs/1NaqFxM9lj4/s320/1147-1.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312824457061109778" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;That interesting piece of news is the result of a new study released by &lt;a mce_href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1147/newspapers-struggle-public-not-concerned" href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1147/newspapers-struggle-public-not-concerned"&gt;Pew Research&lt;/a&gt;.  Fewer than half of Americans 43% said that loosing the local newspaper wouldn't hurt civic life in their community.  even fewer 33% said they would personally miss reading the local paper if it was no longer available.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As expected, of those who regularly read the paper 56% believe that it would hurt civic life in their community and 55% would personally miss it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among younger people, the demise of the local newspaper wouldn't be a great loss.  &lt;a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1147/newspapers-struggle-public-not-concerned"&gt;Pew Research&lt;/a&gt; found that only 27% of Generation-Y (those born after 1977) even read the newspaper.  Fewer that a quarter 23% of those younger than 40 would miss  the paper they read most often if it went out of business.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SbrzFKrxrPI/AAAAAAAAAR0/bdKmMqzqKdM/s1600-h/1147-3.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 271px; height: 306px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SbrzFKrxrPI/AAAAAAAAAR0/bdKmMqzqKdM/s320/1147-3.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312825980529782002" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;There are many more aspects of the report that were released by &lt;a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1147/newspapers-struggle-public-not-concerned"&gt;Pew Research &lt;/a&gt;and another report on The Rush Limbaugh effect is also worth &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;noting&lt;/span&gt;.  Rush was the number two political story in the news last week as his feud with President Obama got the national spotlight.  You can check out that report by &lt;a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1145/media-dow-jones-limbaugh-attention"&gt;clicking here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For a complete report on the demise of local newspapers, click on the link&lt;a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1147/newspapers-struggle-public-not-concerned"&gt; here&lt;/a&gt; to go to the Pew Research site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-7813419371718465865?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/03/many-americans-wouldnt-care-if-their.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SbrxsfUikBI/AAAAAAAAARs/1NaqFxM9lj4/s72-c/1147-1.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3091348557053378232</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-28T16:15:30.002-05:00</atom:updated><title>Who's Using The Web?</title><description>If you think it's only young people using the web, then think again.  Older adults have not only embraced the web but are using it for more hours each month than their younger counterparts.  That's according to a new study by&lt;a href="http://nielsen.com/"&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Nielsen Company&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; this past week.  The study, "&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The A2/M2 Three Screen Report&lt;/span&gt;" of Television, Internet, and Mobile Usage in the U.S.," outlines usage on the three screens, television, the computer and your cell phone or other mobile device. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A few finding of interest to me.  One is the number of time shifting devices in use.  Currently 29% of households have a digital recording device, up from 27% in the third quarter.  And we know from research that 80% plus fast forward past the commercials.  That amounts to a whole lot of money spend by television advertisers only to have their commercials eliminated from the recorded programming by simply fast forwarding the device.  That certainly doesn't bode well for the television industry assuming that the number of devices increases at the current rate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The use of mobile web viewing is up to 11 million households an increase of 9% versus the previous quarter, due mainly to the increase in  available content. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the average 35-44 uses the web a whopping 38:40 hours a month and represents the largest demo for Internet Usage,  Adults 45-54 are 37:46 hours, and 55-64 is 33:39 hours.  These older cells who love news provide a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;fantastic&lt;/span&gt; opportunity for growth of  local news outlets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other findings of interest include:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• 31 percent of Internet activity occurs when consumers are also watching television.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• Men continue to watch video on mobile phones more than women, and women continue to watch video on the Internet and television more than men.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• Weekdays outpaced weekends for online video viewing in October with 65% of online video viewers streaming content between 9am–5pm Monday through Friday, versus 51% of online video viewers logging on between 6am–8pm on weekends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For a complete look at the findings, go to &lt;a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/3_screens_4q08_final.pdf"&gt;Nielsen's blog by, clicking here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3091348557053378232?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/02/whos-using-web.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-5910918903040715395</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-21T14:43:17.624-05:00</atom:updated><title>The Fastest Growing Online Category?</title><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the fastest growing Online category.  I's Job Search!  With the current economy that shouldn't surprise anyone.  Last years, Job search web sites saw visits increase 58%, to 18.8 million visitors, and millions of Americans are looking for a new job.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;CareerBuilder.com leads the category with 9.1 million visitors up a whopping 78% vs. 2007!  Other category leaders saw increases in the triple digits.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The research conducted by &lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2695" mce_href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2695"&gt;comScore a premiere digital media measurment company.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt; &lt;tbody&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="4" valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Job Search Category Total U.S&lt;/b&gt;. (Home/Work/University  Locations December 2008 vs. December 2007)&lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td colspan="3" valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Total Unique Visitors  (000)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Site&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dec-2007&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dec-2008&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;% Change&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Total Internet: Total Audience&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;183,619&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;190,650&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;4&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;12,445&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;18,826&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;51&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;CareerBuilder.com Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5,132&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;9,121&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;78&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Yahoo! HotJobs Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;2,282&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5,605&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;146&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Indeed.com Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;2,712&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5,106&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;88&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Monster.com Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;4,131&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;3,776&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;-9&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Simply Hired, Inc.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;1,188&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;3,104&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;161&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;JOB.COM Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;731&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;1,237&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;69&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;MSN Careers by CareerBuilder.com Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;593&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;1,004&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;69&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;AOL Find a Job by CareerBuilder.com Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;504&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;856&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;70&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Jobs.net Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;350&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;368&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Jobster.com Job Search&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;186&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;365&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;97&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="4" valign="top"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Source: comScore Media Metrix&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/tbody&gt; &lt;/table&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jack Flanagan, executive vice president of comScore, said "While much of the U.S. economy is suffering, job search has performed significantly better than average web site during these challenging times... Americans are turning online for this assistance now more than ever."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Read the entire report, &lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2695" mce_href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2695"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-5910918903040715395?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/02/fastest-growing-online-category.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-9208691183675631406</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-21T14:42:11.480-05:00</atom:updated><title>Local Web Advertising Cools</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Local Advertising has accounted for the most recent growth of Internet advertising over thet past few years.  That tremendous growth curve has begun to level off and even decline in some areas.  Although local business are chopping their ad budgets with the economy in a downspin, local Internet advertising, although not what it has been is probably one of the very few bright spots.  To read more, check out the article from the Wenesday, February 18th edition.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123491660496304367.html" mce_href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123491660496304367.html"&gt;Wall Street Journal- Local Web Ad Markets Cool Down.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-9208691183675631406?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/02/local-web-advertising-cools.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-6405082354442295272</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-21T14:41:37.416-05:00</atom:updated><title>Making Web 2.0 Work</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Web 2.0 technologies like FaceBook, MySpace, Linkedin and others have exploded over the past five years.  Collectively, they now attract over 100 million visitors a month.  And savy business have been looking for ways to harness these sites for business uses.  McKinsey &amp;amp; Company, publishers of the McKinsey Quarterly has studied over 50 early adopters to this technology and released their findings in a report released this past week.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To date, as many businesses that are satisfied with the results of their efforts is ofset by a similar number of dissatisfied companies.  To read more, and to see the Six Ways to Make Web 2.0 work, visit the McKinsey Quarterly.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Business_Technology/Application_Management/Six_ways_to_make_Web_20_work_2294" mce_href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Business_Technology/Application_Management/Six_ways_to_make_Web_20_work_2294"&gt;You can find them at McKinsey &amp;amp; Company's "McKinsey Quaarterly" web site.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-6405082354442295272?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/02/making-web-20-work.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-8171194027574858405</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-21T14:40:57.062-05:00</atom:updated><title>Newspapers Web Traffic Increases In December</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Although newspapers have been getting slammed in the trades about loosing money and not being able to monetize their web efforts sufficiently to keep afloat, the good news is that newspapers web readership in up again in December and there is no reason to believe that the trend will continue.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Former newspaper readers have found their way to the web and they are using the same brand names (local newspapers) they used in the past, only now they no longer want to pay 75 cents a day for news that is often over 24 hour old, when they can get the stories in a more timely manner from the web and often from the same sources they have abandoned.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com./" mce_href="http://www.nielsen-online.com./"&gt;Nielsen Online&lt;/a&gt;, Nine out of the top ten sites December  web traffic was up.  &lt;a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com./" mce_href="http://www.nielsen-online.com./"&gt;Get more info from Nielsen Online, by clicking here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="5" valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Top 10 Newspaper Web Sites &lt;/b&gt;(Dec 2008 vs Dec 2007 U.S., Home  and Work)&lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Rank&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Site&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Unique Audience &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;(000) Dec-07  UA&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Unique Audience &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;(000) Dec-07  UA&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Percent Change&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Top 10 Online Newspapers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;34,602&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;40,093&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;16%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;1.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;NYTimes.com&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;17,177&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;18,187&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;6&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;2.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;USATODAY.com&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;9,939&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;11,420&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;15&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;3.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;washingtonpost.com&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;8,478&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;9,470&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;12&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;4.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;LA Times&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;4,607&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;7,963&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;73&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;5.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Wall Street Journal Online&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5,409&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;7,235&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;34&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;6.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Daily News Online Edition&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;2,956&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5,883&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;99&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;7.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Chicago Tribune&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;3,891&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5,235&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;35&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;8.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;New York Post&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;2,851&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;4,557&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;60&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;9.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;Boston.com&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;4,364&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;4,086&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;-6&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;10.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt;SFGate.com/San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;2,785&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;3,503&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;26&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt; &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="5" valign="top"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Source: Nielsen Online, January 2009&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-8171194027574858405?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/02/newspapers-web-traffic-increases-in.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-8392965960226444795</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-07T19:33:32.712-05:00</atom:updated><title>Youngsters Aren't The Only Internet Users</title><description>&lt;p&gt;In a study released in late January, the &lt;a mce_href="http://www.pewinternet.org/" href="http://www.pewinternet.org/"&gt;Pew/Internet &amp;amp; American Life Project&lt;/a&gt; had some &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;fascinating&lt;/span&gt; findings about Internet users of each age group on line. And while 18-44's make up over 50% of Internet usage, older people are finding many new uses for the net.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gen-&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;x'ers&lt;/span&gt; are the most likely to use Internet banking, do retail shopping and check out health issues on line.  The Gen-X population are made up of folks between 35-44.  And Boomers (45-64) are just as likely to make travel reservations as their younger counterparts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And the Silent generation (64-72) is using e-mail now more than ever before, proof that they are catching on and further proving that the younger generations have move on from e-mail to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;texting&lt;/span&gt;, Twitter, and social media sites like &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Facebook&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;MySpace&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SY4nFjveoRI/AAAAAAAAARU/W2X91IwZVl0/s1600-h/generations.png"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 114px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SY4nFjveoRI/AAAAAAAAARU/W2X91IwZVl0/s320/generations.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5300216787908862226" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a complete look at the study, &lt;a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Generations_2009.pdf" mce_href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Generations_2009.pdf"&gt;click on Pew Internet and get the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;PDF&lt;/span&gt; report.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-8392965960226444795?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/02/youngsters-arent-only-internet-users.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_d0cj00Y4IEE/SY4nFjveoRI/AAAAAAAAARU/W2X91IwZVl0/s72-c/generations.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-2457736099450517511</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-07T20:53:53.612-05:00</atom:updated><title>Can't Afford Concert Tickets, Try Layaway!</title><description>If the thought of $200 bucks a ticket are &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;scarring&lt;/span&gt; you away from the Eagles concert this year, don't fear. Several music &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;festivals&lt;/span&gt; are already on the bandwagon for "layaway" plans for their expensive tickets this summer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hey, if it works for retailers, why not give it a try? Just make five monthly payments of $50 bucks and the tickets are yours!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To read more, &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/musicNews/idUSTRE5050HZ20090106"&gt;check out this article from Reuters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-2457736099450517511?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/01/cant-afford-concert-tickets-try-layaway.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3676466405717873328</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-02T10:44:04.637-05:00</atom:updated><title>65% Watch Video At Work</title><description>It's not going to make employers happy but &lt;a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Neilsen&lt;/span&gt; Online&lt;/a&gt; says that 65% of Online video watching is taking place between 9AM and 5PM, compared with only 51% between 6AM and 8 PM on weekends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="3" valign="top" width="320"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unique Online Video Viewer Composition &lt;em&gt;(&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Percent  by &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Daypart&lt;/span&gt;, U.S., Home and Work)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Day&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Daypart&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Unique Viewer Composition  %&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mon-Fri&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;6am-9am&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;27%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mon-Fri &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;9am-5pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;65&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mon-Fri &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;12pm-2pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;34&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mon-Fri &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5pm-8pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;49&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mon-Fri&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;8pm-11pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;43&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mon-Fri &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;11pm-6am&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;25&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weekend &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;6am-8pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;51&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weekend &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;8pm-11pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;23&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weekend &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;11pm-6am&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="103"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;14&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="3" valign="top" width="320"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Source: Nielsen Online, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;VideoCensus&lt;/span&gt;, October  2008&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The results are in line with &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Internet&lt;/span&gt; usage for news and information sites as well, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;corresponding&lt;/span&gt; with the 9-5 workday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table width="720" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt; &lt;tbody&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3676466405717873328?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/01/its-not-going-to-make-employers-happy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3474685920474055564</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-01T09:00:01.378-05:00</atom:updated><title>Millennials Anxious, But Optimistic About Future</title><description>&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Despite&lt;/span&gt; all the bad news that dominates the media, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Millennials&lt;/span&gt;, those born between 1980 and 1990, are optimistic about the future, according to a survey conducted &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;by StrategyOne&lt;/span&gt; for Pepsi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;80% or four of five &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;millennials&lt;/span&gt; are hopeful about their future and nearly 95% maintain that a positive outlook is essential in dealing with the challenges of life.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the survey, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;millennials&lt;/span&gt; spend more time enjoying life than &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;worrying&lt;/span&gt; about it.  And they are most optimistic about their relationships with family and friends.  Other findings are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;74% find that supporting causes make them feel more optimistic  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;77% of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Millennials&lt;/span&gt; report having a strong sense of optimism about their  careers  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;95% of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Millennials&lt;/span&gt; make positive associations when they think of the word  "change," associating it with "progress" (78%), "hope" (77%) and "excitement"  (72%)  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;67% of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Millennials&lt;/span&gt; say that the election of Barack Obama is making them feel  optimistic about the future of the country.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;For more information, visit the &lt;a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=78265&amp;amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;amp;ID=1234744&amp;amp;highlight="&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Pepsico&lt;/span&gt; site here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3474685920474055564?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2009/01/millennials-anxious-but-optimistic.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-4504676194365963643</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-31T13:58:29.292-05:00</atom:updated><title>Auto Makers Rethink Advertising Options</title><description>US Auto makers need to rethink their media advertising options according to a recent analysis of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;BIGresearch&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;SIMM&lt;/span&gt; database.  The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;SIMM&lt;/span&gt;  survey is a huge data base of over 17,&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;ooo&lt;/span&gt; consumers that determines what and which media are the most influential in the purchase of a new car. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Changes demanded by congress as part of the bailout plan suggest a reallocation of media dollars by the big three automakers.  And according to the study they spend a disproportionate amount of money on television versus other media, and that is out of balance. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Radio, for example, with the amount consumed, its influence &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;over&lt;/span&gt; buying habits, and relatively low cost make radio a strong media option for automakers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The cross platform, consumer-centric media planning and allocation tool  presents a modeled media allocation against the actual ad spending  characteristics in the selected data. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt; &lt;tbody&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="5" valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;?&lt;strong&gt;Automotive Ad Spend vs. Prosper Media Allocation Model&lt;/strong&gt;  (%  of Total U.S. Advertising Spend in 2007)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;General Motors Spend Share&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ford Spend Share&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chrysler Spend Share&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Prosper Allocation Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Magazines &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;12.4%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;11.9%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;10.5% &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;15.6%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Newspaper&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5.0%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;5.2%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;6.9%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;6.2%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Outdoor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;1.5% &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;0.7%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;0.5%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;14.6%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;TV &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;39.1%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;38.9%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;43.2%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;17.3%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Radio &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;3.5% &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;2.3%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;1.9%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;21.5%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Internet &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;7.0%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;6.5%  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;3.0%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;8.5%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="91"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;31.5% &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top" width="78"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;34.5%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;34.0%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;16.3%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="5" valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Source: Ad Age Domestic Ad Spending by Category (2007)/Measured media  from &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;TNS&lt;/span&gt; Media Intelligence's Strategy, Prosper Media Allocation  Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Allocation Model: Media influence weighted by consumption and media cost  for people planning to buy/lease a car/truck in the ensuing 6 months.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;For more information, check out the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;BIGresearch&lt;/span&gt; Web Site, &lt;a href="http://bigresearch.com/"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-4504676194365963643?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/auto-makers-rethink-advertising-options.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3697137858623030124</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-30T09:00:01.435-05:00</atom:updated><title>Podcasting Killed The Satellite Star</title><description>At least once a week someone will ask me, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"How is satellite radio effecting you're business (traditional radio)?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"Not at all"&lt;/span&gt;, is my response, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"as a matter of fact, I doubt that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;XM&lt;/span&gt;/Sirius will be around much longer."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am always met with a response of disbelief, or at the very least, one of those looks as if to say, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"spoken by a true terrestrial broadcaster."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, David L. Smith, who is neither a broadcaster or satellite proponent,  in a blog for Metrics Insider, this week has some interesting observations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let's see what a neutral party has to say, &lt;a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&amp;amp;art_aid=97196"&gt;click on the blog here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3697137858623030124?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/podcasting-killed-satellite-star.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-884473070534306501</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-29T12:00:01.014-05:00</atom:updated><title>Top Search Key Words Reflect Spirituality</title><description>Christmas 2008 was a lot different than 2007, not only in the amount of money spent on holiday gifts (less this year), but the attitude of web users changed too reflected in the holiday key word searches.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The most clicked on holiday key words this year reflected traditional values and holiday spirit compared with the focus on material gifts in 2007. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Top performing keys words this year included, "spirit" and "letter" rather than "gift" and "shopping".  "Santa Letter" topped the list compared to "Christmas present"in 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="articleText"&gt;The upside to the down economy this year became a focus on spirituality and the need to reestablish the meaning of the holidays, according to Amy Shea, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;EVP&lt;/span&gt; and global director at branding and marketing firm Brand Keys. "It has forced people into being more circumspect about what they bought this year for holiday gifts," she said. "Consumers reevaluated the gifts they gave. They didn't stop giving gifts for Christmas or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Hanukkah&lt;/span&gt;, but rather gave more thought when deciding on the gifts to give. This year the world's consciousness became part of the gift-giving decision."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To read more, &lt;a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&amp;amp;s=97285&amp;amp;Nid=50687&amp;amp;p=974680"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-884473070534306501?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/top-search-key-words-reflect.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3925949054776937937</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-29T09:00:01.426-05:00</atom:updated><title>Leisure Time Plummets in 2008</title><description>If you think you've got less time for your leisure activities, you're not alone.  According to new research by&lt;a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=980"&gt; Harris Interactive&lt;/a&gt;, Americans have lost 4 hours of leisure time this year.  Americans report 16 hours of leisure time per week, down from 20 hours in 2007 and off 10 hours since 1973.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The biggest change is how people are using that time.  Television viewing is up 6%.  That makes some sense because with the recession, more people are staying home.  Spending time with family and kids was up as was exercise bot up 3%.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To read more of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;fascinating&lt;/span&gt; study, &lt;a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=980"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3925949054776937937?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/leisure-time-plummets-in-2008.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-5578847284946583803</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-28T16:12:12.035-05:00</atom:updated><title>Amazon Holiday Sales Up!</title><description>At least one on-line retailer is happy with the sales figures this holiday season.  In an article in the &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123029910235635355.html"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;, Amazon says 2008 was the best holiday season ever.As of the 15&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;, over 6.3 million orders were placed, that's 72.9 orders per second.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To read more&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123029910235635355.html"&gt;, click on the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;WSJ&lt;/span&gt; article here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-5578847284946583803?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/amazon-holiday-sales-up.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-3142568333452414747</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-24T09:00:01.208-05:00</atom:updated><title>10% of Social Networking Done Via Mobile</title><description>The number of people using their cell phone to access social networks has tripled in the past year from 3.4% to 9.6% as of October 2008.  That's according to &lt;a href="http://www.kelseygroup.com/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;The Kelsey Group&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.constat.com/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ConStat&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; in a report released on Monday by &lt;a href="http://www.emarketer.com/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;eMarketer.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.emarketer.com/"&gt;eMarketer&lt;/a&gt; predict 800 million users by 2012,  as compared with 82 million worldwide using cell phones for popular social networking site access. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And 15.8% are using their cell phones for local product and services searches.  Social networking is more prevalent outside the US but FaceBook users have grown from 5 to 15 million during 2008.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-3142568333452414747?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/10-of-social-networking-done-via-mobile.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-4155338777330902951</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-23T09:00:01.662-05:00</atom:updated><title>Detroit Free Press to Cut to Three Days a Week</title><description>If you haven't caught on to the fact that the newspaper business is hurting, this story will certainly shock you.  The &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Detroit Free Press,&lt;/span&gt; a 170 year old daily newspaper, has announces that they are cutting their print editions to Thursdays, Fridays, and Sundays.  The paper will rely on their digital products with an increase in digital audio and video and mobile &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;offerings&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Christian Science Monitor recently announced that they would cease print operations in favor of the web in 2009.  This is just the tip of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;iceberg&lt;/span&gt;.  2009 is going to be a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;pivotal&lt;/span&gt; year for the newspaper industry. And there will be some papers closing their doors before 2009 ends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Read more by &lt;a href="http://www.clickz.com/3632125"&gt;clicking here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;iMedia&lt;/span&gt; Trends Comments:  Newspaper web sites are getting fantastic visits and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;page views&lt;/span&gt;.  The problem is getting their advertisers to make the switch from print to digital.  How they accomplish this is going to be the deciding factor in success or failure.  Newspapers are at the tipping point.  It's going to be a rough ride in 2009.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-4155338777330902951?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/detroit-free-press-to-cut-to-three-days.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-2077666508705064441</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-22T09:10:01.198-05:00</atom:updated><title>Xbox Tops The Buzz This Christmas</title><description>In case you needed to know, the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Xbox&lt;/span&gt; 360 has the biggest online buzz of the gaming consoles on sale for Christmas.  &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Wii&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Playstation&lt;/span&gt; are 12 points behind and tied for second, according to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;BuzzMetrics&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt; &lt;tbody&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="2" valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Share of Game Console Buzz&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Game Console&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Percent of Buzz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Xbox&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;41.6%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Wii&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;29.8&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;PlayStation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td valign="top"&gt; &lt;p align="right"&gt;28.6&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td colspan="2" valign="top"&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Source: Nielsen Online, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;BuzzMetrics&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;*Based on messages posted to all blogs between November 1 and December 9,  2008. Percentages are based on total number of messages mentioning at least one  of the three consoles.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more at &lt;a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;BuzzMetrics&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; from Neilsen OnLine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-2077666508705064441?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/xbox-tops-buzz-this-christmas.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-800447976251959016</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-22T09:00:01.556-05:00</atom:updated><title>Clutter Kills Web Sites</title><description>A recent study by &lt;a href="http://www.burstmedia.com/about/news_display.asp?id=1"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Burst Media&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; confirms what many of us have suspected for months, that clutter kills web sites.  The study released last week talked with 4000 web users and found that 75% paid less attention to ads on cluttered sites.  Basically, a cluttered web site does a disservice to not only the advertiser, but the publisher and the visitor as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And, although most web users expect to see ads on web pages, there is a low tolerance for more than two ads on any page.  According to the study 52.6% have this low tolerance and 29.9% will leave the site immediately, if they perceive it to be cluttered.  Women are more likely than men to leave the site if clutter is perceived. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And if that's not bad enough, 54.2% of users have a lowered opinion of the advertiser, if the ad appears on a cluttered site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To read more, &lt;a href="http://www.burstmedia.com/about/news_display.asp?id=1"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;iMedia&lt;/span&gt; Trends comment:  We have been harping on clutter with media web sites for the past two years.  many radio and television web sites looked like banner farms, with ads by the dozens, especially on the home page of media sites.  Not only do &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; ads not work, but they are bad for the advertiser, and the media outlet as well.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-800447976251959016?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/clutter-kills-web-sites.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-4326428678739984975</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-21T09:00:01.683-05:00</atom:updated><title>Marketing E-mail, That's So Last Week!!</title><description>A report released this week by &lt;a href="http://www.eroi.com/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;eROI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/a&gt;says marketing e-mails have very little acceptance among young people.  Students, on average, read marketing emails on a "rarely to never" basis,  with 61% falling into this category, says the report. Only 16% are reading  marketing emails on a frequent basis, while 66% of students rarely or never take  action on marketing emails.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The study identifies the channels are students using most. The preferred  means of communication for college students are: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Text messaging (37%)  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Email (26%)  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Social networking &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;IM&lt;/span&gt; (15%)  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Instant messaging (11%)  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Social networking email (11%)   &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;And 12% of students check email on a mobile device &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;Overall, concludes the study report, "... email plays an important role in  college students' life as a personal communication device, but not as a major  marketing channel."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Visit &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;eROI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; by&lt;a href="http://www.eroi.com/"&gt; clicking here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-4326428678739984975?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/marketing-e-mail-thats-so-last-week.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-9021161775330061969</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-20T09:00:02.151-05:00</atom:updated><title>Online Coupons Hot During Recession</title><description>What is the webs fastest growing category?  It's coupon sites!  The November data released on Tuesday by &lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;ComScore&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, has coupon web site traffic up a whopping 32% over the October stats. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also up in traffic growth for the month was jewelry and luxury goods (25%), toys (24%), and shopping malls and department stores (20%), and electronics (17%).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;ComScore&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; also predicts that online shopping this holiday season will be flat year to year with 2007 at $29.2 billion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Coupons have become increasingly popular since the downturn in the economy as consumers seek bargains.  89% are more likely to use coupons in a recession, and 87% like retailers that offer coupon savings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Visit &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;ComScore&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/"&gt; here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-9021161775330061969?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/online-coupons-hot-during-recession.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19198641389232501.post-1248083861316356171</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-16T09:00:00.734-05:00</atom:updated><title>Most Internet Access Will Be Mobile by 2020!</title><description>A study released today by &lt;span class="articleText"&gt;Pew Internet &amp;amp; American Life Project, projects that the majority of Internet access worldwide will be by mobile device by 2020.  The study, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Future of the Internet III, &lt;/span&gt;surveyed over 600 Internet experts who content that the portability and relative affordability will move users in that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;direction&lt;/span&gt; over the next 12 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the things that will have to be worked out is a set of universal standards that can be deployed to allow consistent service around the globe.  Currently there are 4 billion cell phones worldwide with 15% Internet enabled.  That number is expected to grow exponentially over the next 12 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To read more, &lt;a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&amp;amp;s=96642&amp;amp;Nid=50342&amp;amp;p=974680"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;iMedia&lt;/span&gt; Trends comments:  With Broadband access, wireless connectivity via &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Wi&lt;/span&gt;-Max etc., a cell phone, Blackberry, or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;lap&lt;/span&gt;top will be basically the same device. Smaller, hand held, with instant access.  Not if they can only make the type big enough for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;oldster's&lt;/span&gt; like myself, this will be great!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19198641389232501-1248083861316356171?l=imediatrends.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://imediatrends.blogspot.com/2008/12/most-internet-access-will-be-mobile-by.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Nick Anthony)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>

