<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LSE Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences</link>
	<description>Understanding impact and practice in academic research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 10:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">64384046</site>	<item>
		<title>Extra time is not inclusion – Why redesigning assessments benefits all students</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/14/extra-time-is-not-inclusion-why-redesigning-assessments-benefits-all-students/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/14/extra-time-is-not-inclusion-why-redesigning-assessments-benefits-all-students/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 10:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Accelerated Academy Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timed Examination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For many higher education institutions the default way to accommodate neurodiverse students in assessment is to provide extra time. Drawing on the principles of Universal Design for Learning, Malak Benslama-Dabdoub &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/14/extra-time-is-not-inclusion-why-redesigning-assessments-benefits-all-students/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/14/extra-time-is-not-inclusion-why-redesigning-assessments-benefits-all-students/">Extra time is not inclusion – Why redesigning assessments benefits all students</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/14/extra-time-is-not-inclusion-why-redesigning-assessments-benefits-all-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55983</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualitative research can and should be more open and reproducible</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/13/qualitative-research-can-and-should-be-more-open-and-reproducible/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/13/qualitative-research-can-and-should-be-more-open-and-reproducible/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualitative research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Qualitative social scientists have lagged behind their quantitative colleagues in adopting open social science approaches to research. Discussing their new book, Patrick Dunleavy and Timothy Monteath outline numerous different strategies &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/13/qualitative-research-can-and-should-be-more-open-and-reproducible/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/13/qualitative-research-can-and-should-be-more-open-and-reproducible/">Qualitative research can and should be more open and reproducible</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/13/qualitative-research-can-and-should-be-more-open-and-reproducible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55969</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal jeopardy shouldn’t determine who can research digital platforms</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/12/legal-jeopardy-shouldnt-determine-who-can-research-digital-platforms/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/12/legal-jeopardy-shouldnt-determine-who-can-research-digital-platforms/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 10:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soical Media data]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calls for evidence-based scrutiny of online platforms have intensified globally. But the capacity to produce evidence is unevenly distributed. Alexandra Boutopoulou argues legal uncertainty surrounding data access is creating a &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/12/legal-jeopardy-shouldnt-determine-who-can-research-digital-platforms/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/12/legal-jeopardy-shouldnt-determine-who-can-research-digital-platforms/">Legal jeopardy shouldn’t determine who can research digital platforms</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/12/legal-jeopardy-shouldnt-determine-who-can-research-digital-platforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55962</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polls are a “public good”, they deserve to be better understood</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/11/polls-are-a-public-good-they-deserve-to-be-better-understood/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/11/polls-are-a-public-good-they-deserve-to-be-better-understood/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 10:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Understanding of Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Polls and surveys act as an important conduit between public opinion and decision making. They can even be seen as a democratic and public good. Considering the high levels of &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/11/polls-are-a-public-good-they-deserve-to-be-better-understood/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/11/polls-are-a-public-good-they-deserve-to-be-better-understood/">Polls are a “public good”, they deserve to be better understood</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/11/polls-are-a-public-good-they-deserve-to-be-better-understood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55954</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The costs of limiting academic freedom</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/08/the-costs-of-limiting-academic-freedom/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/08/the-costs-of-limiting-academic-freedom/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student skills]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The UK High Court’s recent decision in favour of Sussex university is the latest flashpoint in an ongoing debate on academic freedom. Chirantan&#160;Chatterjee argues attempts to narrow academic debate could &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/08/the-costs-of-limiting-academic-freedom/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/08/the-costs-of-limiting-academic-freedom/">The costs of limiting academic freedom</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/08/the-costs-of-limiting-academic-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55949</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From microscopes to AI? New tools spark scientific discovery</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/07/from-microscopes-to-ai-new-tools-spark-scientific-discovery/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/07/from-microscopes-to-ai-new-tools-spark-scientific-discovery/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metascience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Infrastrucutre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Discoveries]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Scientific discoveries and the innovations that stem from them are pursued by governments and science policies seeking to ultimately drive human wellbeing. Drawing on the study of science’s major discoveries, &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/07/from-microscopes-to-ai-new-tools-spark-scientific-discovery/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/07/from-microscopes-to-ai-new-tools-spark-scientific-discovery/">From microscopes to AI? New tools spark scientific discovery</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/07/from-microscopes-to-ai-new-tools-spark-scientific-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55941</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spetacularisation, ephemerality and narcissism – Is social media antithetical to academic life?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/06/spetacularisation-ephemerality-and-narcissism-is-social-media-antithetical-to-academic-life/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/06/spetacularisation-ephemerality-and-narcissism-is-social-media-antithetical-to-academic-life/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narcissism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform capitalism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Social media has become an accepted part of academic life. However, as Fernando Vianna, Rafael Alcadipani and Isleide Fontenelle argue many of its underlying dynamics run counter to core academic &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/06/spetacularisation-ephemerality-and-narcissism-is-social-media-antithetical-to-academic-life/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/06/spetacularisation-ephemerality-and-narcissism-is-social-media-antithetical-to-academic-life/">Spetacularisation, ephemerality and narcissism – Is social media antithetical to academic life?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/06/spetacularisation-ephemerality-and-narcissism-is-social-media-antithetical-to-academic-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55930</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vibe coding for qualitative researchers &#8211; Can AI really build our Research Tools?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/05/vibe-coding-for-qualitative-researchers-can-ai-really-build-our-research-tools/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/05/vibe-coding-for-qualitative-researchers-can-ai-really-build-our-research-tools/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualitative research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vibe coding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As proponents of AI claim it will soon replace software engineers, what does this mean for qualitative researchers and research software development? Reflecting on an eight-month experiment building a qualitative &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/05/vibe-coding-for-qualitative-researchers-can-ai-really-build-our-research-tools/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/05/vibe-coding-for-qualitative-researchers-can-ai-really-build-our-research-tools/">Vibe coding for qualitative researchers – Can AI really build our Research Tools?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/05/vibe-coding-for-qualitative-researchers-can-ai-really-build-our-research-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55918</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A successful open access book mandate requires infrastructure not compliance</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/01/a-successful-open-access-book-mandate-requires-infrastructure-not-compliance/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/01/a-successful-open-access-book-mandate-requires-infrastructure-not-compliance/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 15:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REF2029]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond oa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green OA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OA books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research infrastructure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The requirement for longform publications to be open access always seems to be one REF cycle away. Considering the findings of a recent British Academy report on open access book &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/01/a-successful-open-access-book-mandate-requires-infrastructure-not-compliance/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/01/a-successful-open-access-book-mandate-requires-infrastructure-not-compliance/">A successful open access book mandate requires infrastructure not compliance</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/05/01/a-successful-open-access-book-mandate-requires-infrastructure-not-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55911</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing the clocks won’t address inequalities in Indian education</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/30/changing-the-clocks-wont-address-inequalities-in-indian-education/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/30/changing-the-clocks-wont-address-inequalities-in-indian-education/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Standard Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macaulay mindset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahakal Standard Time]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent declaration to establish an Indian global timescale based on Mahakal Standard Time has re-opened debates around decolonisation and the ongoing legacy of the “Macaulay mindset” in Indian education. &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/30/changing-the-clocks-wont-address-inequalities-in-indian-education/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/30/changing-the-clocks-wont-address-inequalities-in-indian-education/">Changing the clocks won’t address inequalities in Indian education</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/30/changing-the-clocks-wont-address-inequalities-in-indian-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55890</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
