<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>In-vitro Fertilization, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Infertility Education Center</title><link>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/</link><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility" /><description>Discussion about the latest developments and advances in IVF (in-vitro fertilization), PGD (preimplantation genetic diagnosis) and infertility diagnosis and treatment. Includes polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</description><language>en</language><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Randy Morris M.D.)</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:26:20 PDT</lastBuildDate><generator>Blogger http://www.blogger.com</generator><openSearch:totalResults xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">31</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><feedburner:info uri="in-vitro-fertilization_preimplantation-genetic-diagnosis_infertility" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item><title>Treating thryoid antibodies in pregnancy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/U99yaGgqC4o/treating-thryoid-antibodies-in.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:59:17 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-116656531076359579</guid><description>The effects of selenium in pregnancy were recently evaluated in a study performed in Italy. This study is of interest to me since we have been using selenium to reduce thryoid antibody levels in women with &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/miscarriage-cause/"&gt;recurrent miscarriage&lt;/a&gt;. Selenium has been found in well controlled studies to reduce thryoid antibody levels but it has neve been evaluated in a pregnant population before.&lt;br&gt;

Approximately 150 pregnant with with elevated levels of one group of thyroid antibodies were split into two equal groups. One group received 200 micrograms of selenium and the other group received placebo. During pregnancy and post-partum, more women who took the placebo were more likely to show evidence of thyroid malfunction and need thyroid hormone supplementation.&lt;br /&gt;

The levels of &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/anti-thyroid-antibodies/"&gt;thyroid antibodies&lt;/a&gt; were reduced in women who took selenium. &lt;br&gt;

Although this study still does not prove that selenium will reduce the risk of miscarriage in these patients, it does indicate that the antibody lowering effects are similar to that seen in non pregnant patients. It also appears to be safe during pregnancy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-116656531076359579?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2006/12/treating-thryoid-antibodies-in.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>IVF Children are Taller and Have Better Cholesterol Profiles</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/feKL04VzaDc/ivf-children-are-taller-and-have.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:52:59 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-112912447137839121</guid><description>A number of studies have been performed to determine whether children conceived as a result of &lt;strong&gt; &lt;acronym title="in-vitro-fertilization"&gt;IVF&lt;/acronym&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; have any greater health risks than children conceived in other ways. Some studies indicate that &lt;b&gt;&lt;acronym title="in-vitro-fertilization"&gt;IVF&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/b&gt;  children may be at greater risk for complications during pregnancy and birth defects. Other studies argue that &lt;acronym title="in-vitro-fertilization"&gt;IVF&lt;/acronym&gt; children may be smaller at birth than other children.

A recent study conducted with New Zealand school-aged children compared 50 children conceived as a result of &lt;acronym title="in-vitro-fertilization"&gt;IVF&lt;/acronym&gt;  to 60 who were conceived naturally. The children were aged 7 to 9 at the time of the study.

The authors of this study found that 15% of the &lt;acronym title="in-vitro-fertilization"&gt;IVF&lt;/acronym&gt;  group was smaller at birth than expected for their gestational age. However...


To learn more about this study click below:
&lt;a href = "http://www.ivf1.com/ivf-children-taller/"&gt; IVF children taller&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-112912447137839121?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/10/ivf-children-are-taller-and-have.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Assisted zonae hatching - AZH -  does not increase IVF Success in women with endometriosis</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/oAL0MGOW46c/assisted-zonae-hatching-azh-does-not.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:01:51 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-112836958732348447</guid><description>Assisted hatching or &lt;acronym&gt;AZH&lt;/acronym&gt; is a procedure occasionally used in &lt;a title="IVF" href="http://www.ivf1.com/In-Vitro-Fertilization/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IVF&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; treatment cycles. There has been great controversy regarding whether AZH increases the chances for an &lt;a title="IVF" href="http://www.ivf1.com/In-Vitro-Fertilization/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IVF&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; pregnancy. Numerous studies have been conducted over the years. Some studies have suggested that there is a higher chance for pregnancy using AZH while others showed no improvement whatsoever.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 

The zonae is a hard protein shell that surrounds the embryo. During &lt;bold&gt;IVF&lt;/bold&gt; cycles, the zonae can be seen under the microscope. Before an embryo can implant into the uterine lining, the embryo must break out of the zonae. This is known as hatching. It has been hypothesized that some embryos may have a more difficult time implanting because they cannot break out of the zonae. During &lt;a title="IVF" href="http://www.ivf1.com/In-Vitro-Fertilization/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IVF&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the process of hatching can be assisted by either thinning the zonae or making a small gap.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Recently, a study was performed to determine whether women with endometriosis who underwent treatment with IVF would have a better chance to conceive with AZH than women who did not have AZH.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

To learn more about this study click below:
&lt;a href = "http://www.ivf1.com/azh-ivf-endometriosis/"&gt;IVF in Endometriosis Study&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-112836958732348447?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/10/assisted-zonae-hatching-azh-does-not.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Stress does not reduce the success of IVF</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/vxDnLHwhqZM/stress-does-not-reduce-success-of-ivf.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:32:45 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-112774272636153030</guid><description>During &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title = "in vitro fertilization"&gt;IVF&lt;/a&gt; treatment, patients frequently ask about the relationship between psychological stress and &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF"&gt;IVF&lt;/a&gt;  success. They often express concern that their own stress might have a negative influence on the outcome of &lt;strong&gt;IVF&lt;/strong&gt;. Furthermore, support groups have advanced the notion that stress reduction can result in greater &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF"&gt;IVF&lt;/a&gt;  success. Groups offering stress reduction services have been actively promoting themselves by citing the results of small scale studies pointing to the benefit of their own services towards improving the success of &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF"&gt;IVF&lt;/a&gt; (at a price of course).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

A recent study of 166 infertile women looked at whether stress affected the success of IVF. All of the women in this study were treated using a standard IVF treatment regimen. The women answered extensive questionnaires concerning psychological factors. The first questionnaire was filled in one month before the onset of IVF treatment and the second questionnaire was completed one hour before the egg retrieval. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

To continue this article click here:
&lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/stress-ivf-success/"&gt;Stress and IVF success&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-112774272636153030?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/09/stress-does-not-reduce-success-of-ivf.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>PCOS Treatment with Zocor</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/UZNfQ5Rp7FQ/pcos-treatment-with-zocor.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 17:47:19 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111637723935887700</guid><description>&lt;b&gt;Zocor&lt;/b&gt;-simvastatin is a medication typically used to treat high cholesterol. Recent evidence suggests that &lt;b class="n"&gt;Zocor&lt;/b&gt; may be a useful treatment for &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/pcos/" title="PCOS - polycystic ovary syndrome"&gt;PCOS – polycystic ovary syndrome&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;h2 class="small"&gt;PCOS Study&lt;/h2&gt;A recent study presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation is the first to look at the effects of these medications in women with &lt;b class="n"&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt;. Women with &lt;b class="n"&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt; are often found to have high cholesterol and triglycerides. 

The &lt;b class="n"&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt; patients in the study were first placed on birth control pills. This was necessary because Zocor and related medications known collectively as statins, are contraindicated in pregnancy. One half of the &lt;b class="n"&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt; patients also received Zocor. 

Continue this article &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/pcos-cholesterol-treatment/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111637723935887700?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/05/pcos-treatment-with-zocor.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>PCOS and Epilepsy Treatment</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/pXvm5PG5PfI/pcos-and-epilepsy-treatment.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 17:43:13 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111637694274957303</guid><description>Women with &lt;b&gt;epilepsy&lt;/b&gt; who are treated with a medication called &lt;b class="n"&gt;valproate (Depakote)&lt;/b&gt; have a higher incidence of &lt;b&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt; symtpoms. There is some evidence to suggest that the higher the dose of &lt;b class="n"&gt;Depakote&lt;/b&gt; used, the greater the chance for developing &lt;b class="n"&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt;. Stopping &lt;b class="n"&gt;valproate&lt;/b&gt; therefore may improve signs and symptoms of &lt;b class="n"&gt;PCOS&lt;/b&gt;.

Continue this article &lt;a href= "http://www.ivf1.com/pcos-epilepsy-treatment/" title= "PCOS and Epilepsy Treatment"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111637694274957303?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/05/pcos-and-epilepsy-treatment.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Egg Donation May Complicate Pregnancies</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/YP1RMyXaRs8/egg-donation-may-complicate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 17:45:09 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111637588799957708</guid><description>&lt;b&gt;Egg donation&lt;/b&gt; uses the technology of  &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/a&gt; to obtain eggs from one woman, the &lt;b class="n"&gt;egg donor&lt;/b&gt;, fertilize them in the laboratory and then place the embryos into another woman, the recipient. &lt;a href= “http://www.ivf1.com/oocyte-donation/” title= “Egg Donation” &gt;Egg donation&lt;/a&gt; is most commonly used when the recipient is older and thus less likely to get pregnant using her own eggs.

&lt;h1 class="small"&gt;Egg Donation, Complications and Age&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;b class="n"&gt;Egg donation&lt;/b&gt; pregnancies have lower rates of complications such as miscarriage and Down's Syndrome since the &lt;b class="n"&gt;egg donor&lt;/b&gt; is younger and therefore produces embryos with a lower rate of chromosomal abnormalities and thus lower rates of these problems. Some complications of pregnancy do not change with &lt;b class="n"&gt;egg donation&lt;/b&gt;. These are problems that are based on the age of the recipient. As women age, they have a higher incidence of complications such as gestational diabetes, pregnancy induced hypertension, intrauterine growth restriction. Older women also deliver by cesarean section more commonly. The increased risks have been thought to occur equally whether or not a woman used &lt;b class="n"&gt;egg donation&lt;/b&gt; to acheive the pregnancy.

&lt;h2 class="small"&gt;Egg Donation Study&lt;/h2&gt;A recent study presented at the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society has suggested for the first time that women who conceive by &lt;b class="n"&gt;egg donation&lt;/b&gt; may be at higher risk for pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH). 

To continue this article click &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/egg-donation-risk/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111637588799957708?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/05/egg-donation-may-complicate.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Medical Treatment of Varicocele</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/68EdCafl0Q0/medical-treatment-of-varicocele.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:28:23 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111358557238044278</guid><description>Last updated / published 4/15/2005


&lt;h2 class="small"&gt;Varicocele and infertility&lt;/h2&gt;Varicocele is a finding in men where enlarged or dilated veins occur in the blood vessels of the scrotum. Normally the scrotal veins have valves that regulate the blood flow. However, in some cases, the valves are absent or defective and the blood does not circulate out of the testicles efficiently. This results in swelling of the veins above and behind the testicles. 85% of varicoceles develop in the left testicle. 

It is estimated that varicoceles are present in about 20% of the normal male population and up to 40% of an infertile population. It is uncertain how varicoceles may cause infertility. Some evidence points to the increased temperature of the blood raising the temperature of the testes, which then damages the sperm. Heat can damage or destroy sperm. The increased temperature may also impede production of new, healthy sperm. Another theory is that in men with varicocele, the testicular fluid which carries sperm has an increased concentration of chemicals which can damage sperm. The chemicals are called reactive oxygen species or ROS.

Previously, varicoceles have been treated using various types of surgical procedures.

To continue this article, &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/varicocele-treatment"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111358557238044278?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/04/medical-treatment-of-varicocele.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Smoking reduces IVF Pregnancy Rates</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/VW2ccKFuRZU/smoking-reduces-ivf-pregnancy-rates.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:04:52 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111297675234468643</guid><description>In a study about to be published in the journal &lt;u&gt;Human Reproduction&lt;/u&gt;, &lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/smoking-infertility/ title= “Smoking and infertility”&gt;infertile women who smoke&lt;/a&gt; were found to have lower pregnancy rates and higher miscarriage rates during treatment with &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="In vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt;.

&lt;h2 class= "small"&gt;Smoking reduced IVF pregnancy rates&lt;/h2&gt;Danish researchers looked at 8,457 women aged 20 to 40 who had had &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="In vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro fertilization&lt;/A&gt; treatment. The patients were divided into four groups, depending on the cause of each couple's fertility problems; male fertility disorder, fallopian tube problems, other clinical explanations - such as polycystic ovaries or endometriosis, or unexplained fertility problems.

Overall, the live birth rate for smokers was 28% lower than non-smokers. Among women with unexplained infertility, the live birth rate was a third lower for smokers, at 13% compared to 20% for non-smokers. This is the same effects as would be seen for women who were ten years older. In other words, a 35 year old woman who smokes would have the pregnancy rate a 45 year old.

Continue this article &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/smoking-reduces-ivf-pregnancy-rates/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111297675234468643?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/04/smoking-reduces-ivf-pregnancy-rates.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Folic acid does not increase risk for twins</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/CAreGDmpeRQ/folic-acid-does-not-increase-risk-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:14:48 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111248082166736612</guid><description>A recent study has disproved the notion that the use of folic acid supplementation increases the risk for twinnning.

&lt;h1 class = "small"&gt;Folic Acid prevents birth defects&lt;/h1&gt;For some time now, I have been recommending that women who are attempting to become pregnant should take 1000 micrograms of folic acid daily to reduce the risk of having a baby with birth defects. The birth defects are known as neural tube defects and include such problems as spina bifida and anencephaly. Recent data have shown that since these recommendations have gone into effect that the rate of neural tube defects has dropped significantly. 

Folic acid, also called folate is a B vitamin found in foods such as spinach and other leafy greens, beans and orange juice. Despite the addition of folic acid to many breakfast cereals, breads and other grains, many women have a difficult time getting the required amound on a daily basis. Thus, prenatal vitamins containing folic acid have been recommended. In the United States, fortifiaction of foods has been required since 1998. 

&lt;h1 class= "small"&gt;Folic acid and twinning&lt;/h1&gt;Some studies have suggested that the rate of twinning has risen since the introduction of fortification. The largest effect was reported in a Swedish study that reported a 45% increase in multiple gestation if a woman use folic acid before pregnancy. However, several studies since 1999 have attributed the increase risk to the greater use of fertility treatments and not from the use of folic acid itself.

To continue this article &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/folic-acid-twins/"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111248082166736612?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/04/folic-acid-does-not-increase-risk-for.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Blood test to predict tubal damage</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/qKAmfqC8G0s/blood-test-to-predict-tubal-damage.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:29:23 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-111247942061536018</guid><description>A recent study published in the journal &lt;u&gt;Fertility and Sterility&lt;/u&gt;indicates that a combination of inexpensive blood tests can predict the presence or absence of tubal damafe from chlamydia infection with fairly good accuracy.

&lt;h2 class="small"&gt;Chlamydia Background information&lt;/h2&gt;Chlamydia is a common sexually transmitted infection (STI) caused by the bacterium, Chlamydia trachomatis. Chlamydia infection is extremely common. Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. The Center for Disease Control estimated that 2.8 million Americans are infected with chlamydia each year. 

Chlamydia can be transmitted during vaginal, anal, or oral sex. Chlamydia can also be passed from an infected mother to her baby during childbirth. Any sexually active person can be infected with chlamydia. The greater the number of sex partners, the greater the risk of infection. 

About 75% of infected women and about 50% of infected men have no symptoms of chlaymida infection. If symptoms do occur, they usually appear within 1 to 3 weeks after exposure. Women who do have symptoms might have an abnormal vaginal discharge or a burning sensation when urinating. If the infection spreads from the cervix to the fallopian tubes some women still have no signs or symptoms; others have lower abdominal pain, low back pain, nausea, fever, pain during intercourse, or bleeding between menstrual periods. 

&lt;h2 class="small"&gt;Chlamydia can cause infertility&lt;/h2&gt;In women, untreated infection can spread into the fallopian tubes and cause the tubes to become blocked at the very ends (distal tubal obstruction). They can also develop scar tissue around the fallopian tubes that makes it more difficult for the tube to "pick up" the egg at the time of ovulation. The problems can lead to infertility and an increased risk for ectopic (tubal) pregnancy. 

Distal tubal obstruction can be detected by performing a &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/hsg/" title="hysterosalpingogram"&gt;hysterosalpingogram&lt;/a&gt;.  Pelvic adhesions, however, can only be detected by undergoing a surgical procedure to look inside of the abdominal cavity. This is usuaully done using a technique called laparoscopy where a fiber optic telescope is inserted through the belly button under general anesthesia. Since laparoscopy is a much more invasive procedure, it is desirable to avoid it whenever possible. 

To continue this story &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/chlamydia-infertility/"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-111247942061536018?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/04/blood-test-to-predict-tubal-damage.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>New FDA regulations will hurt egg and embryo donation</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/X1_qrVlackw/new-fda-regulations-will-hurt-egg-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:34:02 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110917625761986605</guid><description>On May 25, 2005, new FDA guidelines for the donation of human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps), will go into effect. Reproductive tissue such as sperm, eggs and embryos will be affected by these testing guidelines.

Sperm which are frozen and quarantined for several months already will not be adverseley affected. However, eggs, which are currently donated "fresh" and embryos that are designated for cryopreservation will be significantly affected.

7-Day Testing Requirement

The new FDA guidelines require donor testing for a number of communicable diseases such as HIV (AIDS) and hepatitis seven days prior to &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/egg-retrieval/" title="Egg Retrieval"&gt;(oocyte) egg retrieval &lt;/a&gt;. This 7-day window poses a large problem. Most women who are taking fertility medications for  &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="In vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/a&gt; cycles need 9 to 10 days before the hCG trigger injection. The &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/egg-retrieval/" title="Egg Retrieval"&gt;(oocyte) egg retrieval&lt;/a&gt; follows two days later. The same time course applies to egg donors. 

Continue this story &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/infertility-blog/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110917625761986605?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/02/new-fda-regulations-will-hurt-egg-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Americans support &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/pgd/" title="PGD - Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis"&gt;preimplantation genetic diagnosis - PGD &lt;/a&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/DnkNCYMarE4/americans-support-preimplantation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:36:22 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110900716943304902</guid><description>These are the results of what is the largest public opinion survey ever conducted of American attitudes toward &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/pgd/" title="PGD - Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis"&gt;preimplantation genetic diagnosis -PGD&lt;/A&gt;. The study conducted by the Genetic and Public Ploicy Center  shows that more than 67% of Americans approve of &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/pgd/" title="PGD - Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis"&gt;preimplantation genetic diagnosis - PGD&lt;/A&gt; of embryos during &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF - in vitro fertilization "&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; procedures to select those embryos free of a fatal disease-causing gene mutation's. 

Continue this blog &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/infertility-blog/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110900716943304902?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/02/americans-support-preimplantation.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/bzjOYmpRhpw/2182005-infertility-increases-risk-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:52:22 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110876354274172268</guid><description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;2/18/2005 Infertility increases risk of neonatal death&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

A study just published in the &lt;u&gt;British Medical Journal&lt;/u&gt; indicates that couples who take longer to conceive, are at greater risk for having babies that die. This is a very important study. 

The study looked at Danish women who were enrolled in a large cohort study. The authors studied 27,329 births over a three year period. Only first born births were counted. In that group there were 66 babies who died within the first 28 days. This is known as the neonatal death rate. (The neonatal period is from birth to 28 days). 

The mothers had been interviewed during their pregnancies and asked about pregnancy planning and other factors. Women who reported having planned or partly planned their pregnancy were asked how long it had taken them to conceive. If the answer was six months or longer, they were further asked whether they had
received infertility treatment.

They were then separated into 5 groups based on how long it took them to conceive:
&lt;li&gt;Two months or less; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;3-12 months;&lt;/li&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;More than 12 months but with no infertility treatment;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;More than12 months and also had fertility treatment&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Those women who had unplanned pregnancies (weren't trying)&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/adm/infertility-blog/index.aspx"&gt;Click here to continue this post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110876354274172268?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/02/2182005-infertility-increases-risk-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Study: &lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; Blastocyst&lt;/a&gt; transfer for repeated IVF failures&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/cLVMYpU87WY/study-blastocyst-transfer-for-repeated.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:48:04 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110788741004158277</guid><description>An ongoing debate in the treatment of infertility is how to manage patients who have failed to conceive after multiple  &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;In vitro Fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; failures. 
A recent study out of Spain, published in the medical journal &lt;u&gt;Fertility and Sterility&lt;/u&gt; attempted to determine whether using &lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocyst&lt;/a&gt; transfer may work better for these patients.

Some Definitions:

&lt;li&gt;Cleavage stage embryo: An embryo which has begun to divide. Cleavage stage transfers are typically performed on the third day after &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/egg retrieval/" title="Egg Retrieval"&gt;egg retrieval&lt;/a&gt;. This is known as a Day 3 transfer&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; Blastocyst&lt;/a&gt; stage embryo: An embryo which has divided into hundreds of cells. The cells have separated into those that represent the fetus (inner cell mass) and those cells which will go on to produce other tissues like placenta (trophoblast).&lt;/li&gt;

Part of the problem with cleavage stage embryos is that it is more difficult to determine which ones have the greatest likelihood for implantation. Even if they look healthy under a microscope, they may not develop well after the third day. To compensate for this shortcoming, &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="In vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro Fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; programs will increase the number of embryos they place in the uterus. This will occasionally work but it also increases the chances for a multiple pregnancy.

By waiting for 5 or six days, the &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="In vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro Fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; laboratory staff can better pick those embryos which are likely to produce a pregnancy. Typically, less embryos are required and this will also reduce the multiple pregnancy rate.

In this recent study, the researchers identified 148 women who had failed to conceive after at least three &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="In vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro Fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; failures. The patients underwent another &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;In vitro Fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; attempt but this time planning to use &lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocyst&lt;/a&gt; transfer. They compared the pregnancy rate for patients who had &gt;&lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocysts&lt;/a&gt; develop by Day 5 to those in which &gt;&lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocysts&lt;/a&gt; developed only by day 6.

91% of the patients had at least one &lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocyst&lt;/a&gt; to transfer and 73% had at least two. For those patients who had Day 5 &gt;&lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocysts&lt;/a&gt;, the pregnancy rate was 38%. For those who had a day 6 transfer, the rate was only 11%

What does this study show? Well, you could conclude the doing a &gt;&lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocyst&lt;/a&gt; transfer is a reasonable treatment option even for women with repeated &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; failures. We &lt;b&gt;cannot&lt;/b&gt; say that doing a &lt;a href= http://www.ivf1.com/lab-embryo-culture/ title= “Blastocyst” &gt; blastocyst&lt;/a&gt;transfer would have worked better than simply performing another cleavage stage transfer because there was no cleavage stage control group. A major shortcoming of this study.

We can also state that at least in patients with recurrent &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro Fertilization - IVF"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/A&gt; failure, that a Day 5 transfer seems to work better than a day 6 transfer. 

As far as studies go, this one is pretty weak.
&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110788741004158277?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/02/study-blastocyst-transfer-for-repeated.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Single embryo transfer in &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF"&gt;IVF- in vitro fertilization-&lt;/A&gt; may be equal to transfer of 2 embryos&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/6Imn7QbIF8k/single-embryo-transfer-in-ivf-in-vitro.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:39:43 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110786972451320340</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
The chance for pregnancy in &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization - IVF"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/A&gt; is affected by numerous factors. One important modifiable factor is the number of embryos transferred into the uterus. The data tell us that placing two embryos into the uterus will produce more pregnancies than placing one. Unfortunately, it also increases the risk of multiple pregnancy.

Multiple pregnancy, even twin pregnancy, is associated with greater risks than a singleton pregnancy. In fact, every complication that occurs in pregnancy occurs more often in twins. This includes, premature birth, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre-eclampsia), birth defects and even death of the baby. The greater the number of babies in a multiple pregnancy, the greater the risk. 

Unfortunately, many &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization - IVF"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/A&gt; programs still transfer high numbers of embryos in an attempt to boost or maintain their pregnancy rates. This may make the program look better but it puts both mother and baby in greater jeapordy. 

It has been questioned, over the years, whether you can get just as many women pregnant if you put one embryo in over two different attempts compared to putting both in at once. 

Recently, researcher from Sweden put that question to the test. They looked at a specific group of women undergoing &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization - IVF"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/A&gt;. These women are generally considered to be good prognosis patients.
&lt;li&gt;All under 35 years of age&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;On their 1st or 2nd  &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization - IVF"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/A&gt; attempt&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Had at least two good quality embryos for transfer into the uterus&lt;/li&gt;

They divided these women into two groups at random. One group received transfer of two embryos. The other group had transfer of a single embryo with cryopreservation (freezing) of the remaining embryos. If not pregnant, this secoond group were brought back for transfer of a single frozen embryo.

The results were looked at in two ways. The pregnancy rate for each attempt or the per cycle pregnancy rate and the cumulative pregnancy rate over two cycles. 

In the double-embryo-transfer group, 142 (42.9%) of 331 women had pregnancy resulting in at least one live birth compared with a cumulative live birth rate of 29.6% after the first and 38.8% after the second transfer for the single-embryo group. It should also be pointed out that 38 women did not receive a second transfer because they did not have a viable embryo after thawing. 

However, multiple births occurred in a whopping 33.1% of women in the double-embryo-transfer group and in only  0.80% of women in the single-embryo-transfer group (basically one twin pregnancy). 

The difference in live birth rate between the groups was about 4% on this study. Doing some statistical analysis we can say that any reduction in the rate of live births with the transfer of single embryos is unlikely to be greater than 11.6 percentage points.

What can we conculde from all this? Well in a well selected group of good prognosis patients, transferring one embryo at a time is just about as successful as putting two embryos in at once but with a fraction of the risk for multiple pregnancies. 

The costs to the patient will initially be higher because of the extra expense of embryo cryopreservation, storage, thawing and preparation of the uterus for the second transfer. However, the financial and social costs down the road will be considerably lower due to the avoidance of multiple pregnancy. 

At our program, we are well known because we do very well but transfer very few embryos. We have done single embfyo transfers but for the most part patients have been resistant to them. This is in part due to the fact that patients talk on the internet and in support groups and say "My doctor recommended transferring four embryos" Instead of running as fast as they can away from that program, they create the illusion that you have to transfer many embryos to get pregnant. 

Another problem results from failed cycles. Patients have a tendency to demand larger and larger numbers of embryos be transferred after failed attempts even though there is no data that this will improve their chances for becoming pregnant. 

We cannot continue like this for much longer. Some countries already have passed laws limiting the number of embryos that can be transferred. I don't believe we are too far from that happening here.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110786972451320340?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/02/single-embryo-transfer-in-ivf-in-vitro.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Indiana legislature rules in favor of lesbian couples using donor insemination&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/qzaT6IHnumM/indiana-legislature-rules-in-favor-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:36:48 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110786940550981090</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
In a landmark decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that lesbian partners who agree to conceive a child through artificial insemination are both the legal parents of any children born to them. 

In a unanimous ruling, the court said that "no (legitimate) reason exists to provide the children born to lesbian parents through the use of reproductive technology with less security and protection than that given to children born to heterosexual parents through artificial insemination."  

This case arose when the two partners split up and one wanted visitation rights for the child. The lower court initially ruled that one partner had no parental rights because she was not a biological parent.

Now, I'm no lawyer but, it seems to me that this ruling is important not just for gay couples but for all my Indiana patients who use donor egg, donor sperm or donor embryos. If the lower court could negate the parental rights of a partner in a gay relationship, the same would apply for those in a heterosexual relationship who use donated gametes.

In my opinion, the Indiana court made the right decision and one which will benefit all of my patients who live there.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110786940550981090?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/02/indiana-legislature-rules-in-favor-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Study: &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF"&gt;In vitro fertilization - IVF -&lt;/A&gt; babies are at higher risk for birth defects&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/iRZBW5E4MyI/study-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:28:38 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110786931852661308</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
A story published a few days ago in &lt;u&gt;The Australian&lt;/u&gt; reports that researchers at the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth, Australia analysed 25 studies from around the world and concluded that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; babies consistently showed a 25 to 40 per cent greater risk of abnormalities. 

The actual study itself has not been published yet. The authors are quoted however as stating that their study could not determine whehter the increased risk seen was due to &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; or due to the higher risk population being studied. Several studies have indicated that infertile couples may not be representative of the general population and that underlying factors may predispose them to higher risk of pregnancy complications and/or birth defects.

Interestingly, another study by Kathy Hudson, PhD., of John Hopkins University, reviewed 169 studies on children conceived through &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. (See Jnauary 6 2005 BLOG entry). She concluded that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; babies do not have higher rates of cancer, malformations, psychological or developmental delays.

So which study is to be believed? This is the current difficulty in counseling couples about the possible risks of &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. At this point there is no clear and conclusive data that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; itself poses any special risks for birth defects. 

Lets assume for the moment that I am wrong and the new Australian data is correct. The overall risk of birth defects in the general population is about 3%. If the risk is increased by &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by 30-40% then the OVERALL risk amongst all &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; babies is between 4-5%. Stated another way, even if the risk is increased, the chances for baby without defects is over 95%!!. This means that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is still a failry safe procedure.

I am not really ready to concede that the Australian study conslusions are correct, however. In order to settle the issue, we will need a very large study of &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; patients compared to infertility patients of the same age and same diagnoses who conceived without &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. This would be a very difficult study to do. In some cases, it would be impossible. For example a woman without fallopian tubes could not conceive without &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; so you could never have a valid comparison.

Bottom line? Everything we do in this world has some risk associated with it. &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;&lt;u&gt;In vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is no different. The questions is whether the potential benefits outweigh those risks. This is not something that can be determined by a study. every couple is going to have to make those decisions for themselves.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110786931852661308?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/study-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Rh sensitization prevented with &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/"&gt;IVF&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="http://www.ivf1.com/pgd/"&gt;PGD&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/t4xXn9LPqV8/rh-sensitization-prevented-with-ivf.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:12:35 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783172517319561</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;:
Rh sensitization is a complication of pregnancy where a woman can make antibodies against her own baby causing that baby to become sick even while still in the uterus. This occurs when a woman with an Rh negative blood type (A Negative, B negative, AB negative or O negative) conceives a child with a father who has an Rh positive blood type. &lt;b&gt; If the baby turns out to be Rh positive&lt;/b&gt; like the father, then the mother's body makes antibodies against the baby's red blood cells. The red blood cells can be destroyed making the baby anemic. In a fetus this can cause a serious condition called &lt;i&gt;hydrops fetalis&lt;/i&gt; which can be so severe that the baby dies.

Because the immune system has a "memory" each time a woman is exposed to an Rh positive baby her response gets bigger and more aggressive.  

This problem isn't as common as it used to be. The reason is due to the use of a medication called &lt;b&gt;Rhogam&lt;/b&gt;. Rh negative mothers who are given the Rhogam injection during and after a pregnancy with an Rh positive baby will be prevented from making the antiboides so that subsequent pregnancies won't be affected. 
However, cases of Rh sensitization still occur.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783172517319561?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/rh-sensitization-prevented-with-ivf.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Could Leptin be the next fertility medication?&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/_TExGeu1kG4/could-leptin-be-next-fertility.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:53:38 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783112189693779</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
Leptin is a hormone produced in adipose tissue (fat cells). It has been the subject of much study in recent years. Leptin was first discovered in 1994. It is primrily thought of as an appetite and weight regulation hormone. However, leptin also functions to signal the brain and other organs about dangerous states of very low energy availability. Leptin is secreted into the bloodstream in proportion to the amount of energy stored in fat. The leptin is detected by receptors in the brain where it signals how much energy is available. It thereby regulates several key physiological functions that depend on adequate energy balance, including reproduction, metabolism, and bone formation.

We have known for some time that women who have very low body fat and/or those who exercise vigorously, can stop ovulating. Once they stop ovulating, they no longer produce essential hormones like estrogen and their periods can also stop or become infrequent. This condition is called hypothalamic amenorrhea. 

Traditionally, in order to acheive pregnancy in these women, we used one of several techniques. First, we might ask the woman to decrease or stop her exercise or try to gain weight. This is usually successful in getting ovulation to return. However, some women are reluctant to try this approach. for them, we would use fertility medications to induce ovulation. This is effective but requires monitoring and has a risk for multiple pregnancy.

Researchers in boston recently studied 14 female athletes who had stopped menstruating on average five-and-a-half years before the start of the study. They had about 40-percent less body fat than the average woman. Eight of the women received leptin, while the others served as controls. After just three months of treatment, women receiving twice-daily leptin supplements resumed menstrual periods, and their ovaries began to function normally. The hormone also significantly improved bone density bone markers in the blood. No change was observed in the control group.

This is pretty exciting stuff. If these results can be confirmed in larger studies and if a pharmaceutical compnay is wlling to put forth the financial risk to do the additional dosing and safety studies then Leptin could become a vialbe treatment option for this group of patients. 

Could Leptin be used to treat other ovulation problems like &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/pcos/" title="polycystic ovary syndrome - PCOS"&gt;polycystic ovary syndrome - PCOS&lt;/a&gt;? This is less certain. Many studies have been conducted trying to determine whether leptin levels are correlated with &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/pcos/" title="polycystic ovary syndrome - PCOS"&gt;polycystic ovary syndrome - PCOS&lt;/a&gt; but with inconsistent results. Theoretically, however, &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/pcos/" title="polycystic ovary syndrome - PCOS"&gt;polycystic ovary syndrome - PCOS&lt;/a&gt; patients may have too much Leptin and need a medication which blocks or reduces its effects.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783112189693779?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/could-leptin-be-next-fertility.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Three dimensional structure of FSH is detailed - could lead to new drug forms&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/zxaShD-mfVk/three-dimensional-structure-of-fsh-is.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:50:03 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783100319720518</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;

Whenever you see a publication in the journal &lt;u&gt;Nature&lt;/u&gt;, expect something big and important. This is no exception. Wayne A. Hendrickson and his colleague Qing Fan of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) have created detailed images of the reproductive hormone FSH - follicle stimulating hormone and its receptor. 

FSH is the hormone which is created in the pituitary and when secreted into the bloodstream serves to stimulate the ovaries or testicles. Like all hormones, FSH "connects" with a receptor on a cell. This "connection" causes changes in the cell that accomplishes some function. Until now, researchers did not understand key details about how FSH interacts with its receptor, largely because the complex had never been crystallized and examined at the molecular level. These researchers set out to produce crystals of the complex to use in determining its structure using a method called x-ray crystallography. With this technique, x-rays are directed through crystals of a protein to be analyzed. The patterns that result are then analyzed using computers to deduce the structure of the molecule under study.

So why should you care about this? Well the key to understanding how hormones work is understanding where and how they act on their receptors. Once this is understood, scientists can devise derivatives.

FSH is available as a fertility medication under the trade name Gonal-F or Follistim. It is administered as a subcutaneous injection on a daily basis. 

With greater understanding, you might be able to create a variant of the hormone that acts for a longer period time. What if it were possible to give FSH only once a month and still get the same effect? How great would that be? Another possibility is the creaton of orally active FSH medications. Currently this is impossible because FSH which is a protein gets broken down in the stomache.

Of course, none of this will happen overnight but it is a major breakthrough that will yield benefits for years to come. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783100319720518?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/three-dimensional-structure-of-fsh-is.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;67 year old woman delivers twins using &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="IVF"&gt;In vitro fertilization -IVF&lt;/a&gt; and egg donation&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/yoMSIvRu1ak/67-year-old-woman-delivers-twins-using.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:16:54 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783087810483008</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
Over the weekend, the wire services released a story of a 67 year old Romanian woman who has become the oldest woman in history to deliver a baby. The previous record holder was a 62 year old Italian woman.

Obviously, this woman used donated eggs and possibly also donated sperm though the story wasn't clear on that point. Evidently, she has been trying conceive for nine years which means she was "only" 58 years old when she started trying.

Importantly, she conceived a twin pregnancy but was delivered by cesarean section when one of the twins died in utero. 

We know that it is possible to get older women pregnant using egg donation at the same success rate as younger women. We also know that the risk of older women carrying a pregnancy are increased. Specificially, the risk for gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and even intrauterine fetal death are all higher. Essentially 100% of these older women deliver by cesarean section. 

What we do not know is whether there is an age beyond which

&lt;li&gt;Women stop getting pregnant, even with donor eggs &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The risks of carrying a pregnancy approach an unacceptably high level&lt;/li&gt;

This case brings that point up since she lost one of the twins. It is impossible to say on the basis of one case that this was due to her age. Younger women can lose a baby also. 

Even if we do beleive that her age increased the risk of fetal death, what then should we do about it? The simple answer is to restrict the age that women can attempt pregnancy at. However, this is a very slippery slope. If we restrict a woman's right to have children based on risk then what do we do about younger women who may be at greater risk because of other problems? Who becomes the judge in deciding who is allowed to have children and who is not?

This is a question that only society at large can answer and it won't be an easy one&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783087810483008?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/67-year-old-woman-delivers-twins-using.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Do &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization IVF"&gt;In vitro fertilization IVF&lt;/a&gt; success rates decline with age? Duhh!&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/I6JOriPW89E/do-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf-success.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:14:39 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783061044710208</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;

Yesterday, the CDC released a statement along with the results of the 2002 &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/a&gt; statisitcs for U.S. &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/a&gt; programs.

The statement indicated that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/a&gt; success rates decline with increasing age of the female. Well no kidding. The fact that &lt;a href=" http://www.ivf1.com/aging-reproduction/"&gt;fertility declines with female age &lt;/a&gt; has been known for a long time. In particular, it has been known that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;in vitro fertilization (IVF)&lt;/a&gt; success rates decline with age. In fact, every year the CDC has published the clinic success rates the same decrease has been found. This is not news!! &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783061044710208?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/do-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf-success.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;ICSI - &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/lab-icsi/index.aspx" &gt;Intracytoplasmic sperm injection&lt;/a&gt;- does not increase miscarriage risk&lt;/b&gt; </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/te5BrvOTgBs/icsi-intracytoplasmic-sperm-injection.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 05:19:58 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783027270305882</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;
A study out of Italy published in the December issue of Fertility and Sterility compared the rate of pregnancy loss - miscarriage - bewtween patients who underwent standard &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF &lt;/a&gt; and those who had &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/lab-icsi/index.aspx" title="intracytoplasmic sperm injection - ICSI"&gt;intracytoplasmic sperm injection - ICSI &lt;/a&gt;. 

The study looked at the number of fetuses identified on ultrasound in the second trimester compared to the number identified in the early first trimester. 

The conclusion was that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/lab-icsi/index.aspx" title="intracytoplasmic sperm injection - ICSI"&gt;intracytoplasmic sperm injection - ICSI &lt;/a&gt; does not increase the risk that a pregnancy will miscarry. 

I think this adds to the growing body of evidence that &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/lab-icsi/index.aspx" title="intracytoplasmic sperm injection - ICSI"&gt;intracytoplasmic sperm injection - ICSI &lt;/a&gt; is as safe as &lt;a href="http://www.ivf1.com/ivf/" title="in vitro fertilization (IVF)"&gt;in vitro fertilization - IVF &lt;/a&gt;. However, the design of the study does not allow us to determine whether very early miscarriages (those that might occur before a pregnancy can be seen on ultrasound) occur at the same rate. These are referred to as chemical pregnancies and are identified by a positive blood or urine pregnancy test. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783027270305882?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/icsi-intracytoplasmic-sperm-injection.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>&lt;b&gt;Pregnancy after menopause? Not a big deal.&lt;/b&gt;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/In-vitro-Fertilization_Preimplantation-Genetic-Diagnosis_Infertility/~3/t36frKaTrak/pregnancy-after-menopause-not-big-deal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (rsm)</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:45:34 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10691862.post-110783018143649058</guid><description>&lt;br&gt;

A report from a British newspaper and picked up by Reuter's indicated that a woman rendered infertile by chemotherpay has delivered a baby without any treatment. 

Why this story made the news is anybody's guess but it is certainly not that newsworthy. It has long been known that premature ovarian failure (premature menopause) can be induced by cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation. It is also known that of all the possible causes of premature menopause, ovarian failure caused by chemotherapy and radiation have the highest rate of remission. In other words, it is the most reversable.

Studies indicate that women with premature menopause may ovulate and conceive spontaneously in 3-4% of cases. If the menopause was a result of chemotherapy, the rate may be as high as 10-20%. 

Which brings me back to my first point. Why is this is a news story? Probably the medical center where she delivered had a good publicity department. The fact that a Belgian women recently delivered a baby after cancer treatment but with transplantation of a portion of her ovary may also have had something to do with it. Non-medically inclined editors may have thought that this was a similar story which, from the Reuter's report, does not appear to be.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10691862-110783018143649058?l=in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://in-vitro-fertilization.blogspot.com/2005/01/pregnancy-after-menopause-not-big-deal.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

