I think I understand now. Not that this understanding will sound all that wise or insightful, but true understanding always sounds mundane to those without it.

What we have in our society… in our culture… is really a battle between lovers and haters. Between those who feel something and those who don’t feel anything.  My last article sparked some disturbing comments that illustrated for me just how profound this battle is man now finds himself in.

The haters are winning.

Hate comes from division. Blacks vs. whites. The West vs. the East. Islam vs. Judeo-Christianity. Men vs. women. Feminism vs. the Patriarchy. Rich vs poor. The world is awash in division in a way not possible for our ancestors. The Internet and globalization has connected us all and the haters are doing their best to divide and conquer the whole of the earth.  Everyone is stressed out, everyone is depressed, everyone points the finger of blame at someone else for their condition and wants to be rid of those that are causing them all the pain they feel.

But our pain is our own… no one else’s. All the above divisions are meaningless. The only real division that matters is whether you love or hate. Do you love your life or hate it? Do you love the world you are in or hate what it has become? This is the only real battle worth fighting because it will define the whole of your life depending on the side you choose.

I understand why Millennials/Generation Y are so numb and self-absorbed. They have been immersed in a visual culture that celebrates worship of self and spectacle in a way unfathomable to this Gen X’er, let alone his Boomer parents. I have read most of Ferdinand’s writings on it, but I simply cannot connect to this Generation Zero nihilism because I did not grow up in the world he did. While the masthead of In Mala Fide proudly proclaims “The blog that shouted love at the heart of the world,” I wonder if it is true. That masthead is what brought me to write for Ferdinand, but from my first article, the voices of hate and division were unleashed upon me. Being engrossed in a culture of hate means I am not immune to its effects myself and have dished out my own sarcastic version of it in my own comments and in some of my writing. Hate can infect you, but it cannot become who you are unless you allow it.

It is so easy to hate. So primal. So animal. No wonder the elite trigger it (and fear) every chance they get to control the masses. To love is to access our higher brain functions of reason, compassion, empathy, tolerance and acceptance. With a world completely disconnected from self-reflection with today’s instant-on, visual medium communications that engages our lower brain and not our higher one, it is no surprise that hate is spreading like wildfire. A fire that will most likely burn the human race into extinction unless it is put out.

Love is the only water that can put out the fire of hate.

While many here proclaim God to be dead, love is not. The haters may be winning, but it is a faux victory… always has been, always will be.

Ferdinand’s article on the Age of Onanism showed me love is impossible to wipe out. It is eternal. The Satanic elite are using full spectrum-Goebbels-propaganda to ensure hate is the only thing humans feel toward each other and if not that, then to at least drive the human race into numbing itself of any and all positive emotions. As Ferdinand so eloquently put it:

I’d argue that most modern Westerners are erotically autistic, mentally numb to loving their significant others in any deep or lasting fashion. It’s not an instantaneous process, but one that gradually takes hold with every failed relationship and spurned advance. By the time they’re old enough to drink legally, most people are ruined for life. Erotically autistic women become bitchy, sarcastic careerist nags or cat ladies; men become withdrawn Xbox-playing salami-slappers, beaten-down beta males whose women carry their balls in their purses, or emotionally dead cads.

Or said another way…

Haters win only so long as people refuse to love because it is love that is infinite and eternal. I think Ferdinand may be feeling a little love right now and does not know what to do about it. It gives me some hope for the younger generation. Maybe that is because Ferd’s mind has been colonized as so many other young minds have been by those in power to create the world they live in.

Upload: the evolution principal
You see a rock on the shore and say
“it’s always been there”
Download: no responsibility/creator
Do what you want nobody cares
Upload: the master race idea
Genetically disposed to rule the world
Download: a future full of isolated
Full of isolated boys and girls

Upload: a 2-party system
The lesser of 2 dangers
Illusion of choice
Download: a veiled form of fascism
Nothing really ever changes
You never had a voice

If you look, your sure gonna find
Throughout mankind’s history
A colonized mind
The one in power makes law
Under which the colonized fall
But without God it’s just the blind leading the blind

Upload: a joint venture record deal
It’s just another way for the man to steal
While he’s sticking you with the bill
Download: the temporary acquisition of fleeting fame and fortune
Nothing to leave in your will

Upload: a child with no father
Download: no respect for authority
Upload: a child with no mother
Download: a hard time showing love

If you look, your sure gonna find
Throughout mankind’s history
A colonized mind
The one in power makes laws
Under which the colonized fall
But without god
It’s just the blind leading the blind

Ahhhhh… we all claim to be free men here, free from the matrix of mind-control that is mainstream society… but are we really? Or are many simply following another program of hate that is being dictated by those in power, as they have always done throughout history?

Ferdinand has a girl.

A nice girl by the sounds of it, one he actually enjoys tolerating when not fucking her. The problem is, this girl wants a commitment, and by this I mean she wants to take things to the next logical level in a secular, God-is-dead society — she wants to shack up. The fact that Ferdinand did not drop her on the spot proves to me he is at least feeling something for this girl. At a minimum, his article is a public declaration of inner conflict for everything he has come to believe and has written about the state of the world. As much as he proclaims the hedonist life as the only answer to live well in a fucked up society, that shacking up is for losers, that marriage is a prison… he finds himself “trapped” by a cutie he knows is one of the best women he has ever been with.

I could justify how I’ve treated girls for most of my adult life by pointing out that they were varying degrees of fucked up — there’s no harm in breaking something that’s already broken. She’s the first girl I’ve dated in years who is actually normal, girly, largely unscathed by our sick society, and I don’t know what to do with her.

This girl is shattering Ferdinand’s theory of a totally fucked up Western society. She is showing him that the world is not as bleak as he makes it out to be. There are good people… good women… to be found in this world to love and be loved by. He does not know what to do with this girl because she is making him feel something he has never felt before. Ferd… actually gives a shit about this girl.

Or maybe I am wrong. Maybe Ferdinand is the cold-hearted, unfeeling, Generation Zero nihilist he says he is. That this woman is complicating his hands-free masturbation sex life with her dildo-body by wanting to move in together and is at pains as to how to maneuver this girl into permanent hook-up status without shacking up and all that messy relationship crap that comes with it. That’s what Game is for after all is it not? To fuck women, not connect with them right?

Either way… it seems his heart is being pulled in two directions:

• One toward <sarcasm> sweet romantic union and all that icky, beta chump stuff of falling in love that shacking up with a woman entails. </sarcasm>
• The other… to continue to be the hedonist Dionysus many readers here look up to him as, who will ultimately reject all attempts by a female to connect on a deeper level than his life of sexual gratification.

In a nutshell, Ferdinand is caught between living this life…

It’d be insane to claim this “me, Me, ME!” focus hasn’t infected our sex lives. Modern Westerners are completely numb to the concept of love. Oh, they’re excellent when it comes to mouthing sweet-nothings in each others’ ears. The guys know where to put it and how hard to thrust, and the girls know when to moan, twitch and scream. But there’s no connection of any kind beyond the surface motions.

Or this one…

“Oh morning, Ferd.” She was beat-looking but upbeat.

“Yeah, morning,” I grumbled.

“Want me to make some coffee?”

“Nah, thanks anyway.” I’ve been trying to kick the caffeine habit for the past couple of months. “You hungry? Let’s get something to eat over at the Emerald, I’m starving.”

“Sure, I need to take a shower and freshen up first.”

“Uh-huh. You can borrow one of my T-shirts and jeans when you’re done.” I motioned to my dresser.

A relationship. One where the naked woman that was in your bed becomes a human being whom you are forced to connect with as a human being yourself. If there was any more authentic proof of a soul, it is in this. If we were just flesh and bones for procreation, then sex would not be as complicated as it ALWAYS turns out to be. We would just come together, bump in the night, and be off. But that does not seem to happen… not even to those that believe it.

She offered to make Ferdinand coffee… as any loving woman would do.

He offered her his clean clothes because he know hers were trashed and wanted her to look respectable when they went out for breakfast.

That my friends… is love.

So subtle… so simple… so utterly missed by today’s youth.

That is all love is… simple acts of kindness and thoughtfulness about another person and NOT about yourself.

Despite the nihilism that Generation Zero lives in, both men and women, here are two people expressing love and kindness toward one another. You just can’t kill love. No matter how fucked up our culture gets, there it is — love… on full display… yours for the taking.  All man has to do is choose it.

That is why I can’t understand a lot of writers here. Why I feel alien in the world at large. Everyone is blissfully going down the narcissistic hedonist path ignoring all the beauty and love available to connect with all around them, surrounding them, forever accessible at any time if they should choose to see more than just themselves in the mirror that is the world.

That is the choice young men face today.

To choose to love all that the world could be if they wanted it to be with those around them… or choose to hate all that the world has become, that they have had a part in making and shut everyone and everything out that threatens to prove that nihilistic hate to be a lie.

This is why I wrote my first piece asking men to man up. Women will not do it… they are incapable of it. Men can lead society, but they have to choose to do so. Otherwise, it is up to Lilith and we all know where that is headed.

It sounds to me like Ferdinand is not in love-love with this women, which is a good place to be. He is not head-over-heels so he can think straight about it, as a man should. That said, when a naked woman is lying beside you and you feel trapped, the urge to escape as strong as the urge to breathe, you are not in love with her. You are using her, as Ferdinand reflected upon while watching her sleep upon returning from the bathroom early in the morning.

While at breakfast, Ferd can sense this woman, while young and naive, is most likely genuinely in love with him. If she wants to move in together, and has talked about it before, and keeps bringing it up… it is clear she is ready to move things to another level.  She wants more then fuck-buddy status after a gig.

In the past, my parents age, there would have been no sex and this discussion would never have taken place. There would have been some dating, some making out, but very quickly, she would want to know if he wanted to marry and he would be asking himself the same question. My parents did not fuck around fucking around because they knew doing so would only fuck themselves over in the end… alone and with no love in their life.

That is the difference between the generation of religious and God-fearing humans of the 1940s and now. That generation understood and believed that men and woman are meant to be together. Some got it right, others less so, but NONE of them played the fool and pretended there was “nothing going on” between a man and a woman, that sex was just sex.

While God may be dead, God at least imbued in man a sense of spirit and soul — that there was something more to this life than his material existence and the satisfaction of his bodily carnal desires. Without that sense of wonder, of reverence, of respect, of humility before a greater power inside and outside oneself… what do you have?

Men and women masturbating with one another… feeling nothing.

Jerry Maguire was released in 1996. I only watched it as of last year. It is an incredible film because it was a story at the very height of the feminist division of men and women, before the descent into self-absorbed, erotic autism that Ferdinand has correctly diagnosed much of young society to be today. Replete with a divorce support group of man-haters and the single-mom phenomenon that was fast becoming the norm, the film had all the hallmarks of a brutally honest (and comedic, as all good comedy is based on truth) assessment of the times. Yet the writers of this script wanted to throw a Hail-Mary pass for love —that despite ALL the crap divorce was wrecking on marriage and relationships in the 90s, that maybe, just maybe, love was still something worth desiring… worth wanting… worth risking getting hurt to have. The haters had not won yet, but they would begin to over the coming decade as we approached the 21st century.

They want the quan… the love… but they are afraid to actually go out and get it. Like Jerry’s client, young men just want to point a finger of blame at everyone else for the lack of love in their lives. If you want it, you are going to have to believe you can have it and deserve it by kicking your ego to the curb. Love and ego do not mix. You are going to have to start loving your life and the people around you no matter how dark it gets… or you will have nothing in your life to love.

I watched this film and it affected me deeply. I want what is in that movie. It also reminded me just how far society has fallen. The biggest meme in modern society today, that you will read on EVERY internet dating profile, male or female, is that no one needs anyone to “complete” them. But that is exactly how the movie ends — with Jerry declaring that Dorothy completes him. Everyone today believes they are wholly complete and happy by themselves. Bullshit. Bullshit I say because if that was the truth, no man would have need for a woman in his life and vice versa. Ferdinand would be fine with masturbating as it is merely sexual release, not completion of his soul. If men and women are so independent of each other, why are they complaining so loudly about the fucked up state of relationships? If we really don’t need each other, why are we still looking at each other? For sex… just sex?  Come on — am I the only one that can see how big a lie this is to convince oneself to believe?

You can see the beginning of the demise of moral and ethical integrity in the world throughout the film. Maguire was a man of principle. His antagonist, played by Jay Moore, to impeccable perfection IS the model of young men today — completely self-absorbed and living his life as “the man” on campus. Jerry believed there was more to life than the shallow world of sports contracts in the millions of dollars. He wanted the love of his clients because he wanted to love them, and as we see, he is fired for declaring as much in his famous memo. The coming years approaching the turn of the millennium wanted nothing to do with the concept of love, of giving a shit, of caring for human beings that Jerry Maguire stood for. Jerry’s life was also devoid of any real intimate emotional connections with women. He used them to prop up his own ego, unable to be alone for any length of time without female companionship to make him feel like a man. The woman he was to marry at the start of the film was only interested in his star status as a top-ranking and wealthy sports agent… he wanted her for her beauty and the status she had with her job.  They were both masturbating to the glory of their own egos, precisely what Ferdinand wrote about today’s relationships amongst the young. Even the sex was pretty much as Ferd described in his piece.. hot, physical and “passionate.” But they felt nothing for each other in the end because there was no real connection… egos cannot love, only human souls can.

Ferdinand is undergoing a very real Jerry Maguire moment. He cannot see it because he does not have the cultural frame of reference I do. Jerry Maguire was the death of the search for love and meaning in mainstream society. Everything since then has been parodies of love. From Friends With Benefits to The Notebook,”love” today is either about denying men and women have emotions at all or turning love into some drippy romance fantasy that is completely disconnected from the reality of living together as two different personalities. The days of stories that can actually reflect what it means to love, that goes beyond another person and encompasses the whole of the world, to never give up that the world has good in it and there is a reason to love because we are loving creatures… is long gone.

The mid 90s is when music underwent a fundamental shift at the corporate level by the powers that control its content and distribution and therefore our cultural norms. Music IS emotion, it makes us feel… it is the single most powerful medium of controlling human beings. Starting with Lilith Fair, we had women of dubious talent pushed into the lime light only to fade into obscurity. We had Courtney Love and Kurt Cobain ushering in the fucked up generation to come… unfeeling, dead inside, and totally self-absorbed with their own greatness.

This is the world I grew up in as a Gen X’er.

This is the world of Generation Zero.

Some comments said Ferdinand may be in the verge of discovering God. “Every man who knocks on the door of a brothel is looking for God.”

The heart of man desires true love, something good that will last. If he gives up on that, or hardens his heart against that possibility, he teaches himself to settle for counterfeit love and makes do with superficial things that pass away. Not every man ends up at the brothel door, but every man knows the steps in that direction.

Love. Maybe I am the last man on Earth to believe it still exists. Maybe Ferd is about to find it. This woman has brought him to a cross-road in his life. If she had not, he would not have had any need to write about it as his mind would have been made up as to what to do with her.

The only advice I would have for Ferdinand,or any man in this position, is to think about what would be the right thing to do for this woman… as a human being.

If you feel this girl is in love with you and you are not with her, you have to let her go… you have to. Fucking her is only going to screw her up and BREAK HER, turning her into all those other girls you did not mind fucking over because they were already broken. I think you know this and it is a conflict of emotion you are not used to having with women… of actually hurting one. If you think you might have real feelings for her, then you need to decide if you want to take things further and move in together… and you can’t drag it out. The worst thing you can do is avoid being the man and not make the decision for her. That is what she is looking for you to do. Make a decision. Be the man.

I do have some reservations about the girl, only in noting the below that while fictional, was written based on your experience that morning.

“It’s what couples do, Ferd. They live together.” She leaned towards me, staring me down. “I want to live with you.”

Her tone was stern, but it also had a frankness that I’d hadn’t heard from a woman in years. I wracked my brain for excuses.

As much as I believe in love, I am no fool.

I will never be in this position because I will never fuck a woman I am not in love with or thinking of marrying. If I don’t see “a future” with a girl, there is no “us” — no dating, no fucking, no hanging out. I won’t lead a woman on and she won’t have a chance to “work me” to submit to her plan because she is fucking me and I “need” to fuck her to to meet some self-imposed standard of masculinity that says to fuck is to be a man.

The plan is being executed Ferdinand, and if you are not careful, you are going to find yourself in a relationship you never wanted having fooled yourself into thinking YOU were the one in control all along. I think you are… there are hints of it… but then there was this…

“Ferd, I’ve been looking at apartments in the South End —”

“Not this again.”

She has a plan, and no woman executes a plan unless she thinks it has a chance of success. “Not this again…” sounds like she is the one taking the lead of this relationships if you ask me. If you had no need to fuck her to “release,” as you hint that is all it is about… you would not have a woman harping you about shacking up. You would not be fucking either, but you would not have a woman working you over to get with her plan for your future together as a real “couple.”

A woman will never use a stern tone with me to execute her plan for “us,” because she knows my spine don’t bend for no woman. There is no living together… period. If that is what she wants, and I have said no… and she brings it up a second time — que es hermoso … que se llevan a cabo. (“That’s it beautiful… we’re done!”)

I hate to say it… but it is time to man up on this girl. Fish or cut bait… shit or get off the pot. She keeps bringing up living together because she feels she has a good chance of breaking you down eventually. She may be wrong… but if she did not feel she had a chance… SHE WOULD NOT EVEN TRY. Every woman knows intimately how far she can push her man, what makes him tick and just what she needs to say or do to get what she wants. Why put up with all the crap that you will be facing in the future as she continually tries to break your will to her own? For sex? Cut her loose… save her and yourself a whole lot of arguments and by the sounds of it, a lot of heartache for her.

Or better yet, turn the tables on her. Send her a hit out to left-field. Ask her instead about marriage and family… see how she reacts. If she reacts in horror about the thought of it, backpedaling about the importance of school, how her “career” comes first, etc etc, then you know what you have on your hands… a woman who just wants to get out of a dump apartment and loser roommates who knows fucking you and acting “good” will get what she wants. If she asks why marriage all of a sudden… you can say that is why you don’t believe in living together… since it is THE SAME as being married, just without the commitment or paperwork. If she thinks you are ridiculous, cut her loose. She is using you. This is the nature of woman — do not hate her for being female. But if she seems excited and wants to talk about long term commitment, wanting to get married “some day,” wanting children, to love and care for a husband, ding ding ding… you just might have a winner, an actual good woman. They do exist… and you may have one on your hands.

I have found women today to be generally of two types. A career girl pursuing her education to become “someone” of importance (and fuck men along they way with wild abandon), or what my sisters were, a good woman just going along like the sheep they are and using every available social outlet university life offered her to meet as many men as possible for a boyfriend, husband, father to her future children (but most women will never say that is what they want because they were been brainwashed into thinking that is “wrong” and “oppressive.”) If that is NOT you… let her go dude and try not to break her for the next guy when you do… although that sounds pretty much a given at this point.

Just remember, if you move in with her, she WILL change… can you see what she might change into? Happiness in a relationship is about paying attention to the small, insignificant details right at the very beginning. What have you noticed about her… what indications has she given you as to the woman she will become in the future? Pay attention, Ferdinand.

That all said… it sounds like you have a good woman on your hands. Don’t let your nihilistic, erotic autism blind you to the truth…

It is a good world despite all the crap we are surrounded by.  

Haters are only winning so long as we stop choosing to love.

Love… can be had if you want it.

It is not only the men outside the brothel who are looking for God. So too the women inside, who desire that someone may come who might sacrifice, not his money, but himself, not to possess but to serve. Having given up on being served, they settle for services rendered.

The Christian wisdom of Chesterton and Benedict is inclined to see the possibility of hope at the brothel door. A belated discovery of an enduring, eternal love remains possible. And the Christian remembers that Jesus preached the Gospel amongst the prostitutes.

Christ preached to prostitutes because there was no Christianity for him… only the message of love.

That is all I am trying to say here… as long and meandering as this piece has become.

Love… it is the only way to bring peace to the world.

This is a personal post. I have reached a stage in my life where I am face-to-face with total and complete failure. No job. No career. No money. According to many a Western mind, if you add in no car, no smartphone and no wife or children, I would be the textbook definition of a loser and many here may even think as much.

Over the past month, I have attempted to re-energize my foray into a creative field in attempting to become self-employed over the past seven years. I am a “failure” because I have not been able to establish myself full-time at it, never will be, and because I have not made lots of money at it. This belies the fact I have made money, good money, but just not enough it seems according to our society’s now insane appetite for displays of wealth, status and privilege to even belong to said society as a member. There is also now a kabillion competitors in my industry who are willing to do anything to earn a buck. In order to stand out, I must once again compete in that high school farce of “Who’s the Coolest,” which of course I was never a contender for in my youth. Ironically, it is also females that are the ones driving up the numbers of competitors and the push toward style over substance in my creative medium.

So, as I face the coming week with rent due, no money for food, any hint of income a good four months away and having to go to my parents for support at an age I would traditionally be supporting them, I find myself at a loss as to what to do. In these times, I always look for some inspiration to stoke the spiritual fires to carry on and surmount all obstacles in my path.

Enter the life story of Genghis Khan.

I found him at my local library on excursion for what has now become my regular weekend entertainment splurge… an out-of-date DVD movie rental for $1.10 and a bag of microwave popcorn.  I was perusing the well-worn jacket titles when what should stand out… but the Sergei Bodrov film Mongol.

What was the ultimate source of all this man’s failures?

Stubbornness.

The man was just plain stubborn.

He know what he wanted and he would take nothing less. No one owned him. No one commanded him. In taking such an attitude toward life, he was bound to encounter nothing but hardship and blowback from all those around him who wanted to quash such an outrageous and insubordinate spirit.

“A man must choose his wife.” That was the response of his father in the film to young Temujin, tricking him into a trial run with a neighboring clan for choosing his bride that was supposed to be of another clan for political purposes. Temujin did this in order to choose the woman HE wanted that would be his main love for the rest of his life… Borte. Stubborn is what his father called him after this surprising action at a young age, and stubborn is most definitely in my family history.

That is why I am a failure. I am too stubborn to go back to the chains and manacles of a cubicle or retail/service job because of the indignity it imposes on a man who wants to be free of the “excessive tribal violence, including murder, kidnapping and enslavement” (Weatherford, pg xvi) that is work in the 21st century fiat/corporate/bankster world we live in. Like Khan’s time, we now live in an age where it is every man for himself… finances, family, politics, you name it. Where the cold blooded murder of heads of free states and peoples (see Iraq, Gaddafi and soon to be Iran), tribal violence (police state vs. the 99%), kidnapping (see NDAA and indefinite detention without trial now in force all over the globe) and enslavement (the mortgage/debt consumer shackles to the banksters) is now the norm. Like Temujin, I have been running for my life to escape my so-called masters, and I find myself once again cornered and forced back into wage-slave bondage.

I am a failure… but I am free. Free like Temujin where it counts… in my mind and heart. No matter the shackles they impose on me nor the shame they denounce me by for being a “loser,” I am free… because I am not one of them. I am not one of those who have traded slavery for security, hypocrisy for authority, fraud for wealth. I did what no one in their right mind would do… attempt to become wholly and completely self-sufficient in a creative field and risked all… EVERYTHING… I had to do so. In the process… something I am still trying TO process… I lost something that most people never do.

I have lost all fear.

From the film where Temujin is being asked a question by his now conquered blood brother to become Great Khan of all Mongolia…

Jamukha: All Mongols fear the thunder… but not you.

Temujin: I had no place to hide from the thunder… so I wasn’t afraid anymore.

After being chased, persecuted, locked up and written off by all, Temujin realized there was no place a man can run to hide from those that wish to take everything from him. That to continue to run in fear is pointless for what is he truly running to escape from? Loss? Death? Enslavement? Fear is nothing more than a state of mind that one has something to lose when the reality is that we never had anything to lose in the first place. We come into this world with all that we will ever have — our spirit, our talent, our character and our will — and that is all we will ever need to succeed in life. No one can take that away from you. You have nothing to lose, you have nothing to fear.

We men here in the manosphere are all of the same kind, our differences are matters of degree. We see the thunder of our times for what it is — the fire and brimstone of those that wish us to be their slaves as they do everything in their power to convince us they are our masters — but we refuse to cower in fear of them. We know their thunder is not real. My path is now marked with utter failure for the first time in my life (having already come very close many times in the past seven years) but I am not cowed. I am proud of the fact I faced a fear most individuals never will… to go it alone and make my own way and not be dependent on an employer to make my daily bread. In those seven years, half of them were on my own and I would not trade even a single day of that freedom for the security I might now have of a regular pay cheque and “career.”

I am not writing this to make myself out to be some example to follow, far from it. My story can be taken as stark warning to all who contemplate the path I have chosen for myself and the consequences that lie ahead if you fail. Maybe I am a fool for making the life choices I have so far. Very few would call them genius or learned.

But I have never strived to be one of those men approved by the many.

Words are powerful things and I wish to share with you words of an author I want to introduce to you in future pieces.  THESE ARE NOT MY WORDS… for they are words that have no author in being truth. Fool or not, I found them to ring true for me and I took a leap of faith seven years ago in myself, my talents and my future.

The Gamesmaster asked, “Monsieur Pook, how much are you willing to bet on the throw of your dice?” Pook looked at his dice. They were the dice of Talent, Dreams, and Endurance. He looked at his stack of chips, one color being whatever property and ‘things’ he had, another being his societal connections including that of his family and friends, and the most treasured type of chip of one’s most awesome resource: time.

Pook told the Gamesmaster, “Put it all on the table.” The Gamesmaster looked alarmed. “But if you do that, you may lose all your property, all your society, and all your time, and thus, your life. Are you willing to bet all that on your Talent, Dreams, and Endurance?” Everyone in the Casino was looking at Pook now. Very very few people bet it all.

“All on the table,” Pook repeated, rattling the dice. Laughing, he rolled the bones and said,

“The greatest risk you can take in life is not to risk it all!” 

“You can be the smartest person in the world, the most talented, the most persistent, but you will never win in the world or with women unless you embrace the glory of RISK.”

“But Pook, I am scared of risk. What if I lose?”

Pook slapped the youth. “You cannot lose! Everyone wants to define your life, to shape it to their ends. From politicians to your friends. Everything is all right as long as you stay you. But if you break out of the mold, everyone, and I do mean everyone, will try to stop you.”

“So how can we not lose?”

“Just as on the battlefield, the valiant warrior losing in glorious battle is honorable. It is not the victory that defines the Man, it is the fight. There are some people who somehow have this curse or bad luck and must eat an excrement sandwich everyday. They win every time they struggle against that.”

Are you struggling against eating the excrement sandwich being force-fed to you?  If you are not, why are you still alive?

Do not scorn a weak cub.  He may become the brutal tiger.

Mongolian proverb

We men who value truth, justice and a return to natural male-female relations of partnership, trust and love are the weak cubs of the litter. 21st century western society has scorned our values and held our beliefs in utter contempt. The summing up is upon us and a brutal tiger may soon be unleashed on the world — men who will no longer take the excrement sandwich they are served up any longer and who will demand the world be set right again on the pillars of truth, justice and the family.

I know many young men here are living the hedonistic life and have no want or drive to try and make the world right.  But that is as it ever was… as it ever was… until a man like Temujin comes along and says no more.

“Vastly more progressive than his European or Asian counterparts, Genghis Khan abolished torture, granted universal religious freedom and smashed feudal aristocratic privilege.”

Weatherford, from the back cover

That is the task before us gentleman… if we ever wish to be free. Living it up in Thailand with Asian girls or wherever you think you can run to escape the coming onslaught of global oppression is no longer an option. “They” will find you, and you will be put into chains. No matter how far Temujin ran… they always found him.

The only option we have is to fight back. To show these pathetic, psychopathic fools who is the real tiger of the clan, who are the Great Khans of men.

But Temujin did not accomplish what he did alone. He had three important relationships in his life… that of his blood brother and friend Jamukha, his love Borte, and his relationship with his god, the Eternal Blue Sky.

I have always been missing the first two in my life and I am only now working on the third, but I have no doubt in my mind that when all three relationships that are key in the life of a man come together, there is nothing I won’t be able to accomplish. Until then, I struggle. I continue my fight against the excrement sandwich being served to me. I will be planning my escape every second of the day, asleep and awake, for I will be free one day to live life on my own terms and no one will tell me otherwise.

Temujin had another character trait I might also possess that may have contributed to my failure — a dual capacity for friendship and enmity, the ability to make friends and enemies alike, usually in the same person. I am both the easiest and the hardest person to get along with and I think that is because, like Temujin, I am bound to no one in my thinking, beliefs and values and therefore do not fit any single mold that allows a person to have relations that are wholly congenial or forever at crossed swords with one’s so-called avowed enemy.

To wit… the third most important relationship in Temujin’s life, if not the first and only one for I included it above in Temujin’s life where Jack Weatherford did not in his book on the life of Genghis Khan…

Man’s relationship to a higher power than himself.

My Man vs. God series will return and I will continue to highlight man’s spirit in most of my writings as I think this is the key to winning the war the psychopaths that are currently waging against free humanity. It is also a war that we seem to be waging even here within the manosphere. To believe, or not to believe, that is the question.

The religion of Temujin was that of the Eternal Blue Sky.

… that stretched from horizon to horizon in all four directions.  God presided over the whole earth; he could not be cooped up in a house of stone like a prisoner or a caged animal, nor, as the city people claimed, could his words be captured and confined inside the covers of a book.  In his own experience, Genghis Khan had often felt the presence and heard the voice of God speaking directly to him in the vast open air of the mountains in his homeland, and by following those words, he had become conquerer of great cities and huge nations.

Weatherford, pg 6

Temujin became Genghis Khan and launched an empire that conquered more lands and people in 25 years than the Romans ever accomplished in 400. He did this with a firm belief in the Eternal Blue Sky — a God that watched over him, protected him, aided him and guided him all his life. If what Weatherford attests above is true, Genghis Khan would technically be considered a prophet, albeit one who kept God’s murmurings in his head to himself. Whatever the Great Khan heard spoken to him, it had a profound affect on his life and his accomplishments that only a naive person would dismiss as antiquated superstition.

For all of my talk of Islam, if the Prophet Muhammad has a rival for the greatest man the world has ever known, it would be Genghis Khan. The only thing he did not accomplish was found a religion and that is because he had no need to. While everyone else fought wars over divine words in books, Genghis Khan relied on one simple belief — that while being the author of his own life, he was not solely responsible for his defeats or accomplishments. There is a greater power at work in the world of man. If you look at some of the greatest men for positive change in the world, they all had strong faith and belief in a power beyond this world that man could not ignore. Martin Luther King and the Christian message of love and universality of man’s inalienable rights. Malcolm X’s rejection of racism and his intellectual push to turn the civil rights movement into a human rights movement that would encompass all the worlds oppressed minorities, an intellectual argument based on the sound principles of Islam as revealed in the Koran. Gandhi, who borrowed widely from Hinduism, Jainism, Tolstoy (The Kingdom of God is Within You) and Plato (Apology) to create the non-violent civil disobedience movement that brought about the end of not only British rule in India, but as a hegemonic globe spanning empire of oppression (at least overtly). All of these great men, men who truly impacted human history for the better, had faith and belief in a power greater than themselves they could rely on for assistance and guidance and perhaps ultimately, for their very success.

If I have failed where Genghis Khan and all the above men went on to eventually succeed, it is because I have not formed the relationships with my fellow men, women and with God to the point of synergy that allows the creative spiritual force of each human being to be unleashed to its fullest. Let’s once again read Pook on life & risk…

“So to risk is to fight. Then all this knowledge and ‘insights’ are merely the sword, shield, armor, and weapons we fight with? And those who fight, unarmed, are more worthy than those who sit there completely clad with the finest of weapons?”

“Yes. Paradise, spoken slowly, is literally a ‘pair-of-dice’. Gamble what you have. For if you bury your talent and dreams to sit on it, you will receive the wrath of heaven. ‘Unworthy servant!’ will be screamed at you.”

“But what if the situation itself seems IMPOSSIBLE? What if ALL ODDS SEEM AGAINST YOU? What happens then?”

Pook, exhausted from this post, began to vanish towards the Pook Place where all Pooks come from. “Just remember…”

“Opportunities are brilliantly disguised as impossible situations!”

It is time now for me to dig deep. To find the opportunity that is brilliantly disguised in this impossible situation I now find myself in, and it is nothing compared to the tests Temujin faced in his young adult life. To forge the relationships I require to unleash my spiritual force and accomplish something in this world, great or humble.

Many will laugh at the idea of upon death, having “unworthy servant” screamed at you by some great power. Mock it you may, but make no mistake — whether you believe in God or an afterlife or not, you have been given talents, skills and a will to choose how to live your life. It is up to you how you wish to employ them. If you sit on them, if you do not employ your soul to its utmost expression, how can that not be an insult to even chance and evolution that created you?

Genghis Khan focused his entire being… physical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual… on one dream — to unite his people into the largest empire the world had ever seen. Some of his accomplishments were (Weatherford, xix):

• Smashing the feudal/aristocratic system to replace it with one based on individual merit, loyalty and achievement;
• Creating the world’s largest free-trade zone, linking Europe to China and vice versa when neither knew the other existed;
• Lowering taxes for all and abolishing them for doctors, teachers, priests and educational institutions;
• Establishing a regular census for sound governance and the first international postal system for communication and commerce;
• Widely distributing all wealth and treasure to ensure hoarding did not bring down economic activity (shades of Europe and America’s crisis of Wall Street hoarding and corporate fraud)
• Setting down international laws that no person, slave or king was above and to which no human law was above the supreme law of the Eternal Blue Sky;
• Total religious freedom;
• Abolishing torture while enforcing the suppression of banditry and terrorist assassins;
• Refusing the practice of holding hostages and implementing the beginning of international diplomatic immunity for all ambassadors and envoys, even for those of whom he was at war.

This… this is the legacy of Genghis Khan’s life.

A stubborn man who feared dogs as a child and cried easily, who was weaker and less physically skilled than his young brother, who was bullied and picked on by his half-brother and in general left to die of hunger, humiliated, was kidnapped and enslaved and who physically encountered no more than a few hundred people his entire childhood and who could neither read nor write (Weatherford, pg xvi, xvii). Despite all those handicaps, Genghis Khan went on to found the largest empire the world has ever seen, whose foundations were so strong that it kept growing for another 150 years without him.

So, what are you doing with the time and talents given to you by no one other than He (or what) who created you? For you certainly did not acquire them yourself, they were given to you… for a purpose.

Sarging women in the clubs, playing the Game and living the player life?  Is that the mark you want to make on the world?  Do you honestly think if you dedicate your life to the ideals and convictions Genghis Khan lived by, that you will be able to accomplish all that you want and desire fully and wholly on your own or that it is entirely up to you?

Fate did not hand Genghis Khan his destiny — He made it for himself.

Weatherford, pg xvi

So he did. But like most secular, educated and intellectual individuals, Weatherford completely dismissed Temujin’s deep spiritual connection to the one power he knew, when exposed to the elements, the cruelty and the thunder of this world, was the only power that could grant him the reprieves, the victories and the accomplishments he eventually went on to achieve. Bordov beautifully illustrates this connection of the spirit in the film and something I myself only saw more clearly watching it for the second time after the past year and a half exploring God and Islam.

While the idea that a higher power has a say in your success or failure in life might put you off, the idea that it was also Temujin’s love for Borte that played a pivotal role in his endurance will also shock you.

Ferdinand wrote an article on the testosterone reducing affects of marriage, how being involved with a woman brought many a man low and snuffed out all of his creative life force.

I say Genghis Khan (and the Prophet Muhammad) stand out as clear refutations of such an attitude or belief.

For you see… at the end of the film, Genghis Khan tells his wife he chose her. She reminds him that SHE chose him first.

While many men here have taken the Game pill and now view women for the most part as fun and entertainment, eschewing love and marriage and children, it was these very traditional/religious values/beliefs that actually enabled Genghis and Muhammad to accomplish what they set out to do in their lives. These women clearly gave them strength, they did not diminish their masculine and testosterone fueled exploits to conquer and reform society for the better.

This was so because these men CHOSE the women they were involved with as much as those women chose them. It is a wholesome and loving PARTNERSHIP based on mutual respect and trust that is missing from relationships today that is bringing so many men and women down. This of course is precisely what the elite want… a drained and apathetic society of willing slaves focusing on nothing but their own material and bodily pleasures.

A woman can’t be a drain on a man’s masculinity or testosterone if that man had neither of them to exert in the first place.

There it is… that stubbornness thing again, friend and enmity, which is really nothing more than simply standing up and challenging people on what they believe to be true and not caring if it offends someone.

Genghis Khan was stubborn and masculine enough to know no woman chooses him unless he also chooses her and no woman can bring him low.

That no man can claim lordship as Khan over him because he is the only Khan there is or ever will be over his life.

That unless you live your life for something greater than yourself — for God, a dream, an ethic or simply a personal goal — you will never accomplish truly great things and, despite success in this world, may one day be forced to submit to someone who lives for that greater world to come.

So… I have failed in being stubbornness. In this writing, I am hoping to delude myself that there is some great future success ahead for me in my life. Heh.

I tried my best to establish myself as a self-employed person but fate it seems, or God, has other plans for me. I am going back into wage-slavery. I will be going back with a clear heart and mind, for I know most around me will have never even tried what I attempted to do because of the fear that grips them of thunder and lighting in failure. I can punch a clock knowing I tried to live my dream, not lived in denial of it. I will be focusing more on my writing and see where it leads me. My goal now is to take the small savings/investments I have managed to save up over the past seven years, work off my small personal/business debt, and continue to save up my Fuck You Money (props to Ferd for coining an awesome life motto) to embark on a global travel adventure when I hit mid-life. If society is going to reject me and all I stand for, I am going to go out into the world and reject said “society.”

Be stubborn. Become someone no one wants you to be.

That is the life lesson of Genghis Khan.

It needs repeating: the only way to defeat feminism is to defeat liberalism. And not only the liberal institutions, think tanks and corporations, but also in our hearts. Liberalism today is the enemy WITHIN. Stop thinking and acting like fecking liberals! Yes, I mean [you] libertine gamers and whining MRA´s!

- Bruce Banner’s comment on No More Fucking Game Blogs

I am hesitant to have this essay go live. I truly don’t know how it will be received. But if Ferdinand is serious about stirring up a big enough shit storm that ALL of feminism is shat upon with monkey feces, then we better get our monkeys in line and stop fighting each other so we can all shoot shit in the same direction!

This essay comes at a most critical time. A conflict is erupting in full force that until now had been lying dormant under the surface of the men’s movement, whispered only in dark corners and back alleys, with each protagonist sticking to their turf and being content with disparaging the other side in the company of comrades in arms without open battle. The recent and very open, public debate between Frost and Paul Elam has come at a critical time in the manosphere… to unite and join forces or to forever be our own worst enemies.

I speak of the growing divide between the MRA/MRM/MGTOW and Game/PUA blogging communities (here on out MRA and Game to keep it simple). But before I begin, I think an important caveat needs to be said and for all to keep in mind as they read this piece.

Hubris, sometimes spelled hybris (ancient Greek ὕβρις), is a term used in modern English to indicate overweening pride, self-confidence, superciliousness, or arrogance, often resulting in fatal retribution. In ancient Greece, hubris referred to actions which, intentionally or not, shamed and humiliated the victim, and frequently the perpetrator as well. It was most evident in the public and private actions of the powerful and rich. The word was also used to describe actions of those who challenged the gods or their laws, especially in Greek tragedy, resulting in the protagonist‘s downfall.

Shall we begin?

First… I want to express both respect and admiration for all the individuals contributing to the men’s movement that is now gaining growing awareness in main stream consciousness. I recently spent a whole Saturday surfing numerous blogs that have sprung up unbeknownst to me. This is where I started, a simple enough link out on a comment on one of In Mala Fide’s fine articles: Johnny Milfquest’s Horn of Plenty. I just kept right clicking/new tabbing every author on subsequent blog rolls. Astounding… absolutely astounding how pervasive this community of rebel malcontents has become. I was not alone apparently as Delusion Damage recently did the same and has accumulated a MASSIVE blog roll of real time updating man-o-sphere posts.

Both the quality and quantity of writing, thought and debate is making a difference, despite what many a nihilistic 20-year old male might be thinking right now about his future and that of society in general. The individual contributions of men on both sides of the movement… those advocating for fair treatment, justice and an evolved masculinity for man (Paul Elam and the Zeta Male and Jack Donovan) and those advocating for total freedom from traditional (read religious/moral) restraints of any kind on male behaviour and what society (i.e. women) dare to impose or expect of them (as voiced most brazenly by the ever soft spoken Roissy and his sidekick Frost; I don’t know if Frost is Roissy’s sidekick, it just sounded good, don’t anyone get their panties in a bunch). There is also the contribution of the neutral(ish) voice of those men “going their own way.” I speak of Bill at The Spearhead and the great knowledge and awareness that his blog and contributing authors have made to the men’s movement thus far in doing what may be the most unrewarding and under-appreciated work of all… just exposing what is going on and leaving leadership and action to others. The Spearhead was one of the very first (I believe, you can correct me) men’s blogs that literally spearheaded the exposure of all the ills that feminism has wrought on western society. Without Bill’s work and that of his contributing authors and community… I don’t know if we would have the network of men’s blogs we have today.

To unite all these men, I am going to do my best to present both sides of the Frost vs. Paul debate that was, I must say, immature in their approach (i.e. typical chest thumping and claims of “the final word”). I am not immune to such behaviour myself so I am not knocking Paul or Frost, just showing it may not have been the best way to go about it this debate. Yet by the end, both Frost and Paul achieved an understanding and recognition of sorts now that both sides had finally had it out. This is what men do that woman will never understand — get all worked up to work shit out, not just bitch and complain only to get angry and pout when someone offers a solution to said bitching and complaining. This division in the ranks of men is also the very reason why women are able to maintain the upper hand in the sex war as this competitive nature that divides individual men is just not in them (except when it comes to a man ironically enough; woe to the man that gets in between two women fighting over him!) This is why feminism worked so fast and so effectively. Men, ten years on, are still blogging and working out the core principles and beliefs of our “movement.” But in conflict, there is opportunity. This recent lovers’ spat between both sides of the male divide has the appearance of division, but it could very well be the seed of unity. I hope this article will be a catalyst for that very process of regenerative cohesion that will unite all men into one unstoppable force. (If you will allow me my delusions of grandeur, heh.)

I think we should stop and reflect on all these contributors and give a mighty marine HOOAH! to what has been accomplished to date in fighting feminism and turning back the tide of delusion and disinformation about boys, men and masculinity.

With that rally out of the way, I wish to accomplish the following with this essay:

1. To show the merits of Game in a way that MRAs, if they use reason, must admit has contributed to the progress of the men’s movement.
2. To then do the same for the MRA side of the debate and ask that Game advocates humble themselves just a little in thinking Game is the only solution to the feminist problem that men face today.
3. To show that BOTH sides, by yoking their strengths and discarding their differences, will be STRONGER in union than in persisting in division.

To accomplish #3, I am going to have to debunk and disprove some of the sticking points of conflict that both camps are clinging to in order to protect turf and status. Neither side is going to like or agree with what I have to say because it will mean letting go of some very deeply held beliefs that are core matters of dogma and faith to each respective temple of worship.

Before getting started, I want to illuminate the context of this current conflict, a context that is acknowledged to some degree on both sides.  What we have here, as Axl Rose would observe, is failure to communicate.

Look at your young men fighting…

Look at your women crying…

Look at your young men dying…

The way they’ve always done before…

Look at the hate we’re breeding…

Look at the fear we’re feeding…

Look at the lives we’re leading…

The way we’ve always done before…

Remember… it is good men in the trenches that are going to win this fight. But we are not going to win if we keep turning on our brothers in arms to tear each other down.

The failure of communication is a generational gap in morals and values that these respective men simply cannot bridge because the “age” within which they formed their foundational life philosophies (true of false) are entirely alien. They live in different countries. Like a foreign language, these men are communicating but nothing is being understood because the basis for their thinking and reasoning is entirely different.

This author stands in the middle of this generational gap. I would like to think I am Tom Hanks’ character in Saving Private Ryan… a man, caught in a storm not of his own making, thrust into the position of having to try to lead men when he himself does not have a clue what to do. Leadership is not about knowing what to do. Leadership is about facing your fears and trying your best, knowing inaction is the evil that bedevils the soul of every man.

I am a Gen X’er.  The non-generation, the generation with no identity. We were born of the 50′s culture of “father knows best,” but did not grow up wholy in it. Johnny Carson, Elvis, Marilyn Monroe and Yul Brynner were still very much a part of the cultural temperament and tenor of the times I grew up in. John Wayne was still very much in control of the wimmenz… or more accurately themselves as men. Look how HAPPY and FUNNY those times were when I was but an infant. Look at the RESPECT men garnered back then, between themselves and from others.

While there is obviously cross-over in age in terms of READERSHIP with respect to the demographics I have outlined, I am basing my claim of a generational gap in the two camps on blog AUTHORSHIP —  i.e. the founders and creators of the blogs that advocate their respective positions. Bill and Paul… are not Ferd and Frost. Ironically… Jack Donovan seems to be in the Gen X camp I think as am I. A little on the outside of both the other two main spheres of activity in the male blogosphere and a lone voice of contrariness that neither advocates nor renounces the claims made by both sides.

As a Gen X’er, I find myself in the unique position of not belonging to either camp. No manosphere blog truly speaks to my view of the world. (I am also just a tad outside the norm anyway, so there may literally be no place for me.) The MRA camp whines and complains too much for my liking about the wrongs done to men by feminism and has this bizarre aversion to leadership or telling men what they should think/do in any form, which young men are actually looking for from the veterans of the feminist war of the past 50+ years. The Game camp on the other hand, seeing that no leadership is going to come from their fathers or the veteran men that are bruised and battered from divorce, are going their own way and charting a path of hedonistic glory only Alexander the Great could match. Sure, he may have conquered the Mediterranean and East Asia, but we… we have conquered the greatest frontier of all… female sexual behaviour and dynamics!!! It is no surprise their young heads are swelled with power and visions of free and easy pussy the rest of their single Player lives in a way older men could only dream of when they were young.

When a man gets that much power over anything, it goes to his head and clouds his thinking. His vision becomes blurred to the LONG TERM consequences of his actions. The MRA veterans can see where these young men full of piss and vinegar are headed, but because they refuse to take a leadership role and insist on fighting the injustices and wrongs of the past to a generation of young men that wants to forge their own future and put the match to Rome and watch it burn… the power of both camps is undisciplined and ineffective. One is tending toward anarchy, the other to irrelevance (in the sense that when society does collapse, there are no more wrong to right since there is no more society!)

That is not to say they are not having an effect. They clearly are. I am saying MORE discipline among all men will have an even GREATER EFFECT toward the goal of defeating feminism. And unity is precisely the discipline the men’s movement needs right now.

If we can unite these two power movements in the manosphere… there is nothing we can’t accomplish. When this movement of opted-out males collects itself into a philosophic fighting force and hits the beaches that is the feminazi mainland of Western society, we will storm down the gang plank, shoulder to shoulder, and take this fight all the way to the finish — the day when feminism will have to be looked up in the history books to be remembered and feminists seen as the most backward and retarded bunch of men and women God ever allowed to walk the face of the earth.

Are you still with me? Are you tired of the infighting? Are you prepared to allow some deeply held beliefs to be challenged and for reason to unite you with the brother you thought was your enemy?

Game and the PUA Life

As a philosophy toward life, I will make clear my bias up front — I think Game and the PUA lifestyle is a misguided philosophy for man to ultimately live his life by. That said… I recognize the UTILITY of Game as a TOOL, a means not an end, to solving the problem of removing the feminist cancer that is bringing Western civilization down on its very knees. Game is the swiss army knife that will solve any problem that comes a man’s way and his biggest problem has been and always will be — handling women.

While Game, with its total and complete understanding of a female’s psychology and mating behaviour, has its successful adherents that clearly demonstrate the TRUTH of its claims, Game itself has NO AUTHORITY over what is a man, what is masculinity or how a man should rightly conduct himself on this earth.  

Game… is not a philosophy of man.

This is the error Game advocates make. Much like a hammer is not a philosophy on how to build a house, what that house should look like, or why you are building a house in the first place. Game is a tool, nothing more. Game is not optimal. It will take a man in this fight against feminism only so far. Game will be the weapon of choice in the fight on the beaches for some men, but not all. Alone, Game will not take the feminist beach and move men inland to the heart of enemy territory — politics, education and that one time revered institution called “the family.” These are matters of philosophy, not utility.

Just because something is TRUE, does not make it GOOD or JUST or RIGHT in the moral sense. This is where Game advocates go right off the rails. They fail to grasp or comprehend the MORAL aspects of Game because, as a member of Gen Y, they grew up without any morals at all. Religion is dead to them in a way that is not for me. Gen X grew up in a more religious culture than Gen Y did, which is pretty much either non-existent or wholly hypocritical. While not religious, I have not rejected religion or the intellectual concept of God and the moral reasoning that comes from it. For older MRAs that DID come from a strong religious culture (anyone born before 1970), if not personal belief or background… the idea of having moral opinions on Game is not foreign to them. To Gen Y, this lack of moral questioning has been disastrous and shows signs of never even being whispered as they get older because the moral questioning of society that was the realm and purview of religion is extinct in their world. What has replaced religion’s moral admonishments and warnings? Why, the feminist (atheist) mantra that all gender and culture is manmade, of course. Feminists then went about creating the new morality and value set for society and it has thoroughly fucked up an entire generation of young men and women into believing Jersey Shore is funny and even a lifestyle to strive for and emulate. Even if some young men and women don’t agree with Jersey Shore, they STILL THINK IT IS FUNNY, or something to ridicule in the narcissistic status seeking game they all play now. Rare… RARE… will it be for a young person to question the MORALITY, the RIGHTNESS, of a show like Jersey Shore, let alone gasp in shock and horror as I did when I first learned about it and researched just what “The Situation” was all about.

The moral question is precisely the point where Game runs into the MRA movement like The Rhino into Spiderman.

The above Spiderman is Teletoon RETRO for you, as are the Flintstones. The Flintstones was heavily 50s oriented with many traditional moral lessons about men and women and the importance of family. I watched Fred and Barney try to work out their partnership and relationship to Wilma and Betty EVERY DAY after elementary school at 4:30 pm. There was no Nintendo or Sega Genesis to babysit me. These cartoons are fond childhood memories for me and all of them had MORAL LESSONS.

But Generation Zero sees things differently. The YouTube comment on the above Spiderman clip (“I… ghost jerking motion… am the Rhino.”) would never have entered my head. But it would for Generation Zero. It’s a fundamental culture shift in ATTITUDE toward sexual mores and values. I would not think of linking that particular Rhino animation to masturbation, but younger men do and without a second thought (it’s so obvious!). I want Game advocates to THINK ON THAT point. I would never THINK or SEE masturbation in that animated cartoon, or any cartoon for that matter. The reason why is because I was not bombarded with sexual imagery and fantasies from birth to adolescence. As a teenager, I had to get my hands on a PHYSICAL copy of Playboy if I wanted to see some titties. You guys can turn on your damn smartphones and can have STREAMING HARDCORE VIDEO PORN anywhere and anytime you want!  This overt sexual environment has affected your attitude about yourself, about men and women, about family and about life in a way Gen X and many older Baby Boomers simply cannot relate to. I want you under-30s to think on this deeply as Mushashi would advise.

Just like the Rhino hitting that train… the train is the moral question of Game. This is what MRAs are trying to warn you about. They are forcing you to ask MORAL QUESTIONS about wanton and reckless sexual behaviour and irresponsibility and the consequences of your puffed up rooster behaviour that will come home to roost one day… which is INEVITABLE. MRA advocates like Paul Elam have enough maturity and outlook on life to know sex and getting laid DOES NOT make you a man and has nothing to do with masculinity. There… I said it.

Unfortunately, MRA advocates get their clock cleaned in the first round by Rhino Game and with good reason. No one messes with the Rhino and gets away with it. The “top secret” technology that Game has stolen from Mother Nature about females deludes them into thinking they have the wisdom and strength to defeat that MRA do-gooder Spiderman who is the enforcer of moral questions. A do-gooder they see as religion/morality cloaked in masculine terms that STILL wants to white-knight them into some sexual moral code straight-jacket, even if that moral code has no resemblance to chivalry or the religious 50′s traditional past in any way. Game sees the MRA as a call for them to curb their hedonism and walk a path that smacks of paternalism and male “responsibility.” Game advocates say the Spidey way is the way of the Beta male… fighting battles of societal morality and responsibility that for them no longer exist. Peter Parker was after all just an AFC, was he not?

This is why Paul Elam’s article titled “Chateau Bullshit” elicited such visceral reaction from the Game community. It was Spiderman attempting to web wrap the Rhino on his sexual rampage. But what the Rhino wants, the Rhino gets and right now, no amount of moral webbing is going to hold these young men back from getting what they want.

But that is a Marvel cartoon… not the reality of the men’s movement against feminism.

In the manosphere, The Rhino (Game) and Spiderman (MRA) are not enemies.

Unfortunately, Paul used high-and-mighty bombastic language that insulted instead of communicated.  Again, I have been guilty of such behaviour myself so I am not knocking Paul’s approach, just pointing out it may have not been the best way to make his point. A little Spidey humour may have gone a long way. That is always what I liked about Spiderman… forever the exposer of hypocrisy in the most comical and self-deprecating manner.

The MRA… for all its bluster of Game advocates being nothing but “slaves to pussy” are missing the whole point of Game. It is the KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING about the nature of woman that is what is important to the men of Generation Zero and to this men’s movement as a whole. Game is the secret plutonium that Doc acquires to run the DeLorian time machine that throws Marty back to an era and age of normal male/female social interaction i.e one of RESPECT for gender differences and roles.

If you go back to the 50s, what Game advocates are learning in order to attract women was, for most men, common knowledge by stereotype and cultural norms, if not outright biological study and observation that todays young men have gone about acquiring their knowledge. Be the man. Sure… all the 50′s man had was that one philosophical axiom, not the science and art that Game is today for Generation Zero, but that was the whole point of Paul’s article. For MRAs… for Paul’s generation of men and older… getting laid IS NOT A BIG DEAL. Sex is not the sole focus of life because that was not the CULTURE they were brought up in. They don’t really have to think about it because, to some degree, they HAVE an innate sense of masculinity that harkens back to the days when men were men and women were women. Sure, Paul does not have the ability to know when to Phase Shift or isolate his target, but he doesn’t need to. He just does it. Game is a reality because there are NO MORE MASCULINE ROLE MODELS for young boys to look up to to pattern their behaviour on in order to “just know what to do.” Ditto for young girls. Again, I hope Gamers will study this in earnest.

All Paul and the MRA are saying to the Game community is… relax. Not getting laid won’t be the end of the world. That, and focusing on sex will be to the detriment of the whole of your life.

That said, no one wants to go back to the days when sex was a mystery until marriage, although there is sound arguments for at least TRYING to keep it in your pants a little while and get to know a girl for a fuller and more rewarding sex life. What I am advocating is that much of the male apocalypse we are now struggling through is due to the very lifting of those 1950′s patriarchal restrictions, not just on women, but on men as well! Family… long lived, monogamous marriages… are important to the structure of CIVILIZED society. A key to this was LIMITED sexual partners and taking the time to GET TO KNOW one another before getting naked. There was also a division of sex roles and responsibilities. The 1950′s man and woman took it for granted that there was MORE to life than just sex. Today’s twentysomething? “What?  More to life than porn and my XBOX? Are you freaking nuts old man?”

Back to the Future is an awesome film, and interestingly, it is placed in 1985… THE VERY YEAR I would declare to be the dividing line between the MRA and Game community. I came before 1985 and was raised in a 1950′s household that ignored the feminist storm of the 60′s, 70′s and 80′s. While some families were sunk in that divorce storm, not all were. Anyone born well before or after 1985 is living in a different universe and that is why they can’t see each other’s point of view.

Game will defeat feminism, just not by itself. There, I said it. Not because it gets a man laid, but because it has cracked the mystery that is the female and her sexual/mating habits. It will allow men to define a masculinity based on SCIENCE and OBSERVATION from experiment. The knowledge of Game goes FAR BEYOND merely getting laid. It is espionage of the highest degree, like a coach stealing the other teams playbook, on how women think and behave as a FEMALE, the other half of the genus Homo sapiens. What men of the 50′s knew as “woman” was stereotyped convention and religious upbringing, but it was accurate and we can see those same masculine/patriarchal values in Game that work to get women to submit and follow a man just as religious convention and gender stereotype did back then.

What young men know today from Game is from science and broad observation, study and experiment collected all over the internet for any man to study, incorporate and verify as true for himself. The two views of women (traditional/religious and Game) are very similar, but the application is going to be radically different. Game is also giving the very tools most fathers, Marty’s in Back to the Future especially, did not have to pass on to their sons in order to succeed with women.  Such tools as the following:

• Accepting the nature of female hypergamy and working with it, not against it
• Knowing that a woman’s ACTIONS in choice of men are more important than what a woman says about she wants in a man
• The importance of FEELING to a woman and, if you give her the right feelings, sex is a no-brainer
• That displays of alpha male characteristics can be learned and are indistinguishable to most females from the real thing
• Shit tests, frame, negs, kino, IOIs, phase-shifting, AMOGing
• Ignoring the primary target, take-away and reward
• Not falling for her attempts to get you to “pay” to be with her like a traditional chump
• Maintaining frame, always guiding the interaction with a woman from the very start

This is what MRAs who throw out Game without studying it are missing. The vital knowledge that will PROVE feminism is a false paradigm and that patriarchal masculinity IS the very foundations of CIVILIZED society, not some cooked up scheme to “oppress” women. Game accurately shows the true nature of the male/female dynamic.  A science that until the 21st century, was only accepted as religious dogma or gender stereotype. This is vitally important to defeating feminism.

MRAs ignore this knowledge to their own detriment. Understanding how the female mind works could not have happened before the Internet. Let’s face it… no father could teach this to their son because most fathers had no clue when it came to women aside from again, stereotype and religious/cultural norms. The only place a young lad might hear of “game” back then would be from locker room boasts of conquest (or trying to be invisible when such talk came up). Other then that, most men kept their mating strategies to themselves as it was such a potentially embarrassing, emasculating and shaming subject to bring up with a dude friend. “You mean you don’t know how to get laid?” Before the Internet, the depth and the breadth of discussion about how females choose and mate with various males would never have happened in the “perfect” world of the 1950′s or even 1985. Those men succeeded only because the culture of the time encouraged men to be men and women women. Sadly, those days are gone and will never return. So for the MRA to advocate nothing more than taking a shower, smelling good and to ignore women… boggles and insults the mind of a man in his 20′s, especially if he has Game.

So young men turned away from their fathers and to the Internet. It was the first place where male discussion about such a topic could remain anonymous. Men could openly discuss their frustrations and failings with women over and over and over again until they got the female figured out. This is where some of the first Game and PUA forums got there start. The founding one (or at least where I began my knowledge journey) was SoSuave.

This is what the older MRA generation does not get… and I think are also jealous of. They simply never had the kind of tools, techniques and most importantly… SUPPORT of other men to get laid as the younger generation of men now have and I think it pokes at their pride and insecurity a little about their successes with women in the past. Sure, older MRAs get laid… but if what these young buck Game gurus are saying is true… these boys are getting laid by more women and higher quality pussy than every before in history… and they can REPEAT that success like a machine! THAT is just a little too damaging to the ego of any man still struggling to get laid or wondering if the quality and number of women he does get “naturally” (i.e. shower, smell good and ignore women) are ALL that he is ever going to have access to.

So let me make what I just said clear. I believe some MRAs are jealous of Game. Just acknowledge this… don’t get angry or pompous about it… and MOVE ON.

Wow… I just checked the old SoSuave forums. Maximus is still there! Old posts, 2000, but if you are a member there, just search for my user name. I found one post I commented on and linked it below. The post was by Anti-Dump. This was the days BEFORE Game became a phenomenon. I don’t think PUA or Game as terms were coined or in wide use yet. The forum tone was much more open and inquiring, sharing and supportive, especially before 2000 when it was really underground. In a few short years, the Papas and Tyler Durdens took over and it became one big dick swinging turf war over who had the best Game in town. I got in just as Game and PUAs were to burst on the scene in LA as detailed in the book by Neil Strauss – The Game. In a few short years, SoSuave degenerated into what Game advocates are accused of being… scripted robots, slaves to pussy. Again, not ALL Game advocates and PUAs are slaves to pussy… but that is what you are after, is it not? MRAs… have different goals. Being told this is not an insult, it is just a fact and Gamers need to chill just a little and also… MOVE ON.

I put this out there for those in the Game community to show that I am fully familiar with the concepts, techniques, tools and what the philosophy of Game is all about. I may not be aware of how it has changed since, oh, 2003 or ’04 when I left the community… but I was there from the beginning, like you, just wanting to at least get a date. And yes, I realize even using the term “date” dates me, but that is the very reason I am not a Game advocate nor an MRA. I still believe dating to be a GOOD thing for men and women to do and that women are not all the evil both camps claim them to be.

Sadly… for all the praise given to the likes of Roosh and Roissy, much of their writing is on just that — getting pussy. Look at any of the posts and comments on a Game blog. The goal is… to get laid. Laid a lot, by “high quality 9s and 10s” as Frost puts it I believe. I spent a whole Saturday like I said going over these Game blogs. There was a lot discussed about improving one’s life, but the overall theme…. sex, sex and more sex!

There is nothing wrong with this. Hell, sign me up!

But is that it? Is Game enough of a life changing and enlightening philosophy to actually rid men of the evils of feminism? To be a guiding philosophy for a man’s life? To progress society forward and for the better? Let’s not fool ourselves… Game is claiming to be a LIFE PHILOSOPHY which means there are metaphysical claims being made about “man” and “woman” that are going to guide EVERY DECISION a man makes in life.

I will quote at length here the post by Anti-Dump I commented on back in 2000.

The Perfect Don Juan

He asks for a girl’s phone number when he FIRST meets or sees her. Not one month later.

He always asks for the HOME phone number. He walks away if he doesn’t get it.

A Don Juan always waits four or more days before calling a girl. She must wait.

A Don Juan never arranges a date face-to-face with a girl. He always calls first. She must wait and wonder about him.

He sees a girl ONLY once a week for the first three weeks. He has to ‘clear’ his dates with other women. Or pretend he is busy with other women. He says he is busy if she wants more.

A Don Juan never gives flowers, cards, or gifts for the first two months. Her birthday is the only exception .

He never talks over an hour with a women on the phone. EVER. Twenty minutes is tops. He avoids contact with her. With e-mails and messages, etc. between dates. He calls once to arrange the next date.

During the first three months he tells her NOTHING about himself. She has to ask. When asked, he gives only tiny itty bitty pieces.

He waits for her to say ‘I love you’ first. Then he knows she really means it.

A Don Juan never says ‘I love you’ before two months. Ever.

A Don Juan NEVER proposes before six months. He prefers to wait one year. All minor flaws must be seen.

A Don Juan never lives with a women. He is a free man. He will marry the BEST when he meets her.

A Don Juan only FOCUSES on the romantic side of a women. He knows long talks lead to friendship not LOVE. He knows being a mystery fascinates her and makes her WONDER and WANT him.

And lastly, a true Don Juan makes sure the relationship is 50-50. HALF of the time she is doing what HE wants to do. He feels this in his stomach. Not head.

AD

This is my transition point in this essay… the pivot that Game vs MRA infighting hinges on and I want to blast this divide to smithereens as any good Navy Seal demo man would do to advance his boys deeper into enemy territory.

Notice that Anti-Dump is not offering advice on how to be a master PUA and the methods of breaking LMR (last-minute-resistance) to simply get laid — as Style and Mystery teach and much of the Game community is obsessed with. Check that LMR link… websites like that were non-existent when I got into “the game” and LMR may not even have been a term yet.

Notice that Anti-Dump is not adopting the “take a shower, smell good, ignore women” approach of Paul Elam and the MRA movement as all a man needs to do to get laid. He has rules. He has game. Anti-Dump also seems to think there IS a good woman he can find that will work with his life and make a good relationship/marriage partner. He does advocate marriage and he does genuinely like women, unlike the MRA or Game communities that spit in disgust every time they hear woman or marriage spoken.

Remember… I was not going to let EITHER camp in this debate get away without a few smacks of humility.

Anti-Dump advocates the truly masculine path… the middle way.

His focus was not sex… but respect! His goal was not to get laid, but FIND A WOMAN THAT ACTUALLY LIKES HIM. Of course, he wanted to get laid as much as any man and that requires discipline (i.e. Game). But without self-respect (MRA), all the pussy you get is for naught. You are in the end just a dildo for her pleasure no matter how well you Gamed a woman into giving up the poontang.

The future of the men’s movement has to be about sexual self-respect and asserting a strong, re-definition of masculinity that is not ideological, but based on what we know about men as a gender from science and creating a new philosophy through rational discourse on the nature of man. 

A lot of that new definition of man is going to come from the Game community about what women respond to and like/admire/adore/love/crave/obsess/hate about in a man.

Game is about throwing the old moral code of chivalry and religious sexual restraint out the window in favour of as much pussy as one can turn feminine last-minute-resistance into hedonistic erotic bliss.

MRA is also, ironically enough, about throwing out the old moral code of chivalry and religious sexual restraint, but it seems to want to forever languish in cries and battles of unfairness and injustice due to feminism while refusing to outright declare any absolute masculine/dominion nature to man over woman. If man is “responsible” for woman, that is traditional white-knight dogma they reject, even if it is true!

Sadly, MRAs are attempting to take the high ground by denying the very tool that will allow them to make man’s dominion, not dominance, over woman permanent in the future. Remove Game, you remove the very tool that will keep a woman in her proper place… submissive and happy!

But those who practice only Game will hit a wall in their personal development because your life is still trapped in the script of Game. You are never a truly free and empowered masculine male when you are forever scanning for shit tests and asserting frame in the correct way and manner to maintain control of a relationship. Ergo, you have not made Game NATURAL… you are not a natural masculine male.

Those who advocate the MRA path of “shower, smell good, and ignore women” will never appreciate the subtle dynamics that drive women toward one man or another. They will never have the full picture, only the appearance of knowledge of the female, not the actual knowing.

Here is how I think Paul should have opened his “Chateau Bullshit” article. He should have adopted the wisdom of Bruce Lee and appealed for simplicity, while at the same time acknowledging the merits of Game for which Bruce Lee was adamantly opposed (i.e. the fundamental basics and techniques of wing chun that led to JKD).

The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity.

Before I studied woman and getting laid, a female was just boobs and pussy, getting laid a matter of doing what my friends did, my father advised, or whatever I thought might work. It generally worked out ok.

After I learned the art of seduction that is the PUA lifestyle and Game, a woman was no longer just a female with boobs and pussy. Getting sex was now a science, an art, a riddle solved and to be solved as many times as I could solve it!

Now that I understand the nature of woman and getting laid, a woman is just a female with pussy and boobs, and sex is really not that big a deal and something I need to devote anymore time to understanding or pursuing.

This is the needed hubris of Game and the PUA life. You priests and proselytizers of Game… Bruce Lee did MOVE ON and become more than his wing chun techniques, strategies and understanding. He TRANSCENDED his art and became something wholly unique, with a purpose and drive all his own and the creative force to accomplish anything he set his mind to once he freed it. Bruce’s sole purpose in life was to be the most complete human being he could be. To do that, he had to break free of ALL conditioning, to become the unconditioned. Game… is holding you back. Game… is a conditioned way of life. Why are you afraid to break free?

MRA and Men Going Their Own Way

Right up front, the hubris the MRA community commits… is the same as Bruce Lee in the opposite to that of the Game camp.  Gamers are caged by the techniques and tradition that have built up around Game. MRAs reject Game. But without wing chun, Bruce would not have had the solid foundation of martial arts knowledge to go on and master and create his own style. This is what the MRAs don’t get about the advantages of knowing and practicing Game… mastery of the female mating mind and total knowledge of woman’s sexual nature!

Bruce Lee could claim to be free of the limitations of conditioned responses and traditional patterns of the martial arts of his heritage because he had mastered them so completely, they were now limiting his freedom to fight. MRA advocates refuse to acknowledge Game in any serious way and this is their hubris. They refuse to believe there are any rules to follow to be successful with women and that the Game of dating/sex is not something one should obsess over. In some way, they are saying they are “above and beyond” Game and that irks the Game community to no end. This was the same argument Bruce Lee advocated about the merits of JKD. But, Bruce WAS a master at wing chun. Many MRAs refuse to study or even try to apply the principles of Game to their life and interactions with women. Is it any wonder then that they balked in outrage at being told all one needs to know to get laid is to take a shower, smell good and ignore women?

It is like training with Bruce and when he corrects your technique… you say you already know how to kick. Sure, maybe you do, but if you don’t open your mind, empty your tea cup as it were, you might never truly attain mastery of a kick, just mere competence as was implied in Paul’s article.

The young men of today in this men’s movement are not interested in mere competence, they want to master women and life and to that degree, I think MRAs need to give the Game community some respect and credit for what they have learned and accomplished.

But to you Gaming PUAs and your suave moves and pea-cocking ways… listen up.

There is a chance… a small chance… that the man whose kick Bruce Lee is attempting to correct in technique might also have something to teach Bruce about WHY he is learning to kick in the first place (i.e. what it means to be a man). In perfecting his fighting style, Bruce did have a childish need to “prove” to everyone he met that his style was the best and most effective in a fight. It was an obsession of his, to prove the old ways are all wrong and limiting and that he had “the answer” to freeing the martial artist from tradition and the box of kata/form that is conditioned response. But I wonder how often Bruce asked himself why he was fighting in the first place? What was the purpose of perfecting his stance and feints? Just to win a fight? Is Game and the attainment of sex with any female you desire the end of all your practice and dedication?

We are our fathers. Time proves this to be so. We are also unlike them in so many ways as to be hardly compared. Then we look in the mirror of self-reflection and there it is… Dad… staring right back at us. It is the quintessential paradox of nature and nurture. As much as we try to escape our past, we keep running right back to it.

Gamers most likely had fathers who were wholly incompetent with women and under their stiletto heel. In the case of Generation Zero… most likely also entirely absent. If their Dads had Game, they would not need to study Game… it would be in their blood. Game is about taking the average male and giving him the knowledge and techniques of the “alpha” male to win the heart of the ladies.

MRAs most likely had fathers who had self-respect and some Game, but who harboured a seed of inadequacy in comparison of his life to other men in the brutal competition for mates and money that allowed him to attain the level of self-respect he did achieve. Any analysis of griping and complaining about what has been “done to me” is usually rooted in jealousy and low-self esteem. Sure, there are legitimate claims of injustice due to feminism to be made, but a masculine man does not stay there… he moves on and OVERCOMES all injustice and the bad hand dealt to him in life.

I had a father that was neither successful or not with women (I am here, so clearly, the man got some), nor thought of himself as deficient or superior in any way to other men. He was simply… a man. Neither good nor bad. Strong nor weak. Of note or of no consequence. He lived his life according to truth, love, compassion, hard word and most importantly… respect. I know I have fallen short of his meritorious example in many ways… but I also know I have excelled him in his faults and self-doubts which he did his best to keep hidden from me with a brave face.

This next generation of men… have the duty to do what our fathers never had the opportunity to do before.

We are going to have to rebuild what being a man and masculinity is… from the ground up… now that feminism has almost completely destroyed it. The myths of chivalry and paternal responsibility of the past have been shattered. An ethos of hedonism and nihilistic rage and rebellion are taking root, but hedonism and rebellion will not make for a PEACEFUL, HAPPY AND JUST SOCIETY.

There is a reason that older men in the MRA are constantly harping on Gamers to cool their jets and keep their pants on.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT GOT THEM INTO TROUBLE!!!!

Sex… the desire for it and the pursuit of it… is what gets every man into trouble eventually. At the minimum, it will bring him problems and a restriction to his freedoms.

Remember, the Baby Boomers are of the 60s generation of free “love,” sexual hedonism and “rebellion” against the powers that be. Anyone over 30 could not be trusted right? Well, look at the end result… an entirely fucked up generation of adults, children and grandchildren barely surviving as they continue to believe they are entitled to every last penny and widget the world has to offer them.

How did Boomers get this way?

They threw off the chains of sexual moral constraints, as feminists declared they should do. They abandoned traditional gender roles for being a man and woman, as feminists declared they should do. Screw the man! I am not going to turn into my parents.  I refuse to conform to the religious and traditional moral code of oppression and tyranny of “the man!!!”

Sound familiar, Gamers?

These Baby Boomers, when the feminist nightmare was unleashed, did what men always do… conform to whatever women want in order to get laid. That meant bending over backwards to ensure Jill was not “oppressed” anymore by Jack.

But Gamers are not like the boomers. We reject feminism. We reject conformity to women. We reject anyone telling us how to live our lives, especially our sex lives, feminist or traditionalist. We are defining a new masculinity that is free of any historical baggage.

Uh huh… and look at yourselves.  Here are the words of Axl Rose once again for clarity…

Look at the hate we’re breeding…

Look at the fear we’re feeding…

Look at the lives we’re leading…

All of you… every last die hard advocate of Game… all have the same mission in life: to get as much sex as you can from as many women as you can bed. To do this, you are MOLDING yourselves to FIT what the female wants TODAY, just like your father did, just like his grandfather did. No matter how many other areas of your life you do improve, the sole focus and underlying philosophy toward life via Game is… to get laid. It is breeding a culture of fear and hatred of the female that MRAs are also contributing to. Look… at the lives you are leading.

THIS is what the Boomer MRAs are trying to warn you about. Stop letting your penis lead your life. It does not matter how much you have accomplished in freeing yourself from the feminist matrix. If the FIRST THOUGHT on your mind when you see a hot babe is how to enter into a set with a contextual opener perfect for the environment and then find a way to approach her from an angle and deliver it in passing over the shoulder to show you are not hitting on her and are about to leave… you are a scripted robot obsessed with sex.

This is all Paul was trying to tell you in his “Chateau Bullshit” article.

And naturally… because he spoke the truth… your HUGE EGO could not take it.

Paul and other MRAs are also doing there best to WARN you Playas how DANGEROUS it is to go around fucking women like no tomorrow TODAY.

Never mind the REAL risk of contracting an STD, it is the CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT itself that you are playing in that you are wantonly ignoring to your own peril. The culture of false rape accusations and zero tolerance of sexual harassment. In fact… it just got a whole lot more dangerous for men on campus that Paul is desperately trying to warn you guys about.

Brown University declares due process dead

“You need to check your behavior carefully before you enter into a relationship with a woman. There will be no due process if you are accused of rape. The woman’s version of what happened will always be accepted over the man’s account.”

If you think this will be ONLY on campus, you are in for a rude awakening. THIS THE FUTURE of all male-female relations in the Western feminist matrix. Just ask this fourth grader who was suspended after calling his teacher ‘cute’. 

You Gamers are potential sex addicts and it is going to get you into trouble some day. Yes, some of you are. Roosh would be a prime example, or would be in the book Bang. So was Neil Strauss in The Game. When the red pill of Game is swallowed and a man gets a little success with women… he goes right off the rails and wants to fuck every woman within eyesight that he can successfully ‘game.’

The MRAs are trying to warn you Gamers…

Play with matches long enough… and you are GOING TO GET BURNED!

It is a MORAL exhortation and warning.

Oh, not me.  I have tight Game.  I know how to handle my women.

Sure you do. Read the above Brown University quote again. Our Western society of ‘freedom’ is giving due process a full kick in the ass out the door. Especially when it comes to men and their choice or not to even approach a girl and say hello. (Or for a fourth grade boy to say his teacher is ‘cute.’)

The Politics of “Hello”

“One of the stumbling blocks I repeatedly have over discussions of street harassment is that much of the time, on paper, it’s doesn’t look like harassment. Hell, much of the time what makes me uncomfortable isn’t harassment.

Much of the time, what makes me uncomfortable is hello.”

Hello can get you accused of sexual harassment today. In the future, it might even be called a pre-crime to rape! (Logically, if you said hello to a woman, and you are a man, a man who desires sex, and all men are capable of rape, your hello was a potential act of rape, or so the argument would go.)

How the fuck is “Game” going to counter that? Hell, soon just looking at a woman from across the room, even if only a scan of the room with no direct focus on her… if SHE feels you are ‘looking’ at her… she will have the boys in blue putting you in handcuffs and making sure your head hits the roof of the squad car to teach you a lesson in manners and proper etiquette toward the female gender.

Look, I am not saying don’t go out and interact with women or try to get as much pussy as you feel you deserve. There is no reason to FEAR woman as some MRAs advocate. Some MRAs go too far and think cutting off all contact with women is the only answer in our feminazi culture, much like you guys think Game is the only answer to counter it. Neither extreme approach will work.

What I am saying and the MRA is trying to warn you Gamers about… is that you are running around with matches in a pool of gasoline. Sure, as long as you don’t drop any matches, you will be ok… but the FUMES are there… and in the rigid and closed politically correct and enforced culture of Western feminist society… the fumes are only BUILDING and getting more and more impossible to avoid being sparked by any match in the room, dropped or not.

To also nix any STD talk about the dangers of sex that many MRAs advance as the primary reason Game advocates need to keep their pants on (as this seems to be an area of huge contention)… while real… they are, I believe, overblown. In my own research and talking to my doctor, the impression is if you touch a girl with something, you will get it. The truth is, EVERY person will be different in their susceptibility to STDs and STIs. Any STD/STI has to be ACQUIRED. There is a study ongoing about sex workers in Africa who are CONTINUOUSLY exposed to men with AIDS… but do not contract the disease as a possible source of immunization from their blood in the future. This science is still in its infancy, but the idea that “one contact” is all it will take, while true, is not 100% applicable to every person and every sexual encounter. Your susceptibility to catching anything is probably going to be a combination of factors that include: your overall health, the strength of your immune system (for HPV for instance), how many partners you have and their sexual history, and how risky you are even with protection. I recently had a condom slip almost entirely off  and that has never happened to me before. There was a brief time I was unprotected. How long? Probably only a few strokes, I don’t really know. The point is… IT DID HAPPEN! I also climaxed very shortly after pulling out to relax which means, if I had not and IF the condom had slipped completely off… I would have blown my load INSIDE and had my swimmers steam-bolting for the end zone and a possible touchdown.

I know for a fact you guys practicing Game will have such an experience and probably have already. If not now, one day, no matter HOW CAREFUL you are. You will get caught up in the moment, lose yourself, and “Oooppssss.” And no matter how “safe” you are… with enough partners, you are going to come into contact with STDs.  Think about the kind of women you are fucking… the ones you “sarge” at the clubs… do you really think your Game is that good you are within single-digit partner status with any of these girls?

And that is all it will take… one oops with the wrong girl. You are a daddy and the full force of the law will be upon you, or, you will be getting a call that your latest lab test “found something the doctor would like to speak to you about.” Do you really want EITHER of those phone calls?

Even worse, you will have done EVERYTHING right, and when you collapse in a heap she will offer to ‘dispose’ of the condom for you… and zip, inside the baby oven go your swimmers anyway.

Think you can avoid this? Make her swallow and always dispose of the condom yourself tied up in a nice little bow?

You are missing the point.

Let me allow a fellow Gamer nail the point home.

Her: “I knew you were a sure thing.”

Me: “Hahaha. Moi?”

- My First Groupie – The Asian Nympho

Ok, ear plugs? Check. A shield of some sort to deflect flying objects of rage? Meh… I will just duck and weave, I am pretty agile. Ready to take a punch? Only if Game-boy wants to take on a black belt, but sure, I think I can handle whatever comes my way.

The above is from a real-time narrative of a hook-up related by the above Game blogger in ‘scoring’ with his first groupie. A woman that is a fan of his Game blog and heard of him in some way. I only highlighted the above from the post because it makes my point crystal clear.

The girls you game, most of them… ALREADY KNOW THE SCORE!

You are,  to be blunt… an easy fuck for these women.

You are a dildo to MANY of these women. All that “Game” does is ensure she KNOWS you are not some clingy nice-guy that is going to want a relationship with them. You are not tricking a woman into sex. She is USING YOU for sex! Go and read the whole post. You can see her lead this guy around like a dog on a leash. And like a dog to his dinner bowl, he behaved exactly as she expected him to and was rewarded with a doggy treat… some pussy. “I knew you were a SURE THING.” Think on that statement deeply.

“Great!” you say.  “What do I care?  I get laid, so does she, we are both happy.”

Are you really? I read somewhere that people in the porn industry, men and women both, are really just desperate for someone to love them. All the overt sexuality is a cover for inner insecurity about being loved in any deep and meaningful way by another person. Sure, maybe some girls can’t see you coming and Game gets you into trouble because she develops things like “feelings” and you have to “manage expectations” as Game teaches you to do.

But that just proves my point. You are avoiding her feelings and suppressing yours. In the case of those wonderful slutty girls that know the score and are glad to find a male-slut who “gets it” and just wants to get laid… well, congratulations. You are now both emotionless, mutual, masturbatory dildos for one another.

But, we feel emotion. Sex is emotional. We just don’t get all tied up by our emotions or let them rule our lives in any way. What is wrong if both people consent and are having fun?

Nothing. Nothing at all. The problem is… that is the EXACT delusion FEMINISTS want to have pervade the whole of society. Sex is just random hook-ups and flings. No bonding, no love, no children and God forbid “family” that comes with marriage and long-lasting companionship and also the attendant RESPONSIBILITY of BOTH SEXES.

Game advocates that focus SOLELY ON SEX… are playing RIGHT INTO the feminist end game.

This is not taking ANYTHING AWAY from Game and what it has unearthed about the nature of woman, the female. It is just pointing out the end game that Game is leading you boys to… total feminist domination over the whole of society. We can even see how some Game advocates are speaking the same language of feminists and their utopia for society…

Absolute freedom of contract between the sexes in matters of sex and marriage.

- Freedom Twenty-Five

Ok Gamers, tell me… how does the above NOT SOUND like the first commandment of feminism?

Ok, are you settled down now? Breathe. Jesus, did you ever break a lot of shit! You almost clocked me with your MacBook! And if I had not tripped you up and aikido’ed you into the couch ass-over-tea-kettle, you might have sent me to the hospital.

Look…

I and other MRAs are not saying you can’t do whatever the fuck you want. It’s your life.

God knows, if there was a generation of young men with MORE REASON THAN EVER to simply say FUCK OFF to the whole of society… it is you.

All I am saying… all the MRA is saying… is stop for a minute. Look at your life. Look at the woman next to you that you just Gamed into giving up what she used to believe and once thought was special and important enough to give to only one man she loved who would care and provide for her for the rest of her life… and yes, this was a BELIEF SYSTEM and not her feminine nature… and ask yourself the questions.

• Is this really what you want the men’s movement to be about?
• Is this really what you want future relations between men and women to be like?
• Is random sex, no marriage, no children, no family… really going to be in the best LONG TERM interests for society?

No… of course not. Right now, marriage and family is suicide. You are young, horny and have the skills and cojones to fuck beautiful women anytime, anywhere, and on your terms.

But you can’t stay there forever.

You will have to grow up.  You will have to… gasp… man up.

Yes, I just said man up and to the ire of both MRAs and Gamers. If you are angry at being told to do so, that is because YOU are still TRAPPED in feminist and traditionalist dogma and bias about what “man up” means. I am here to tell you there is a CORRECT way to man up and THAT is and should be THE GOAL of this men’s movement. When men TRULY man up, feminism is over… c’est fini!

That is all I, Maximus, am saying.  Men are going to have to man up, young and old, and right this society or it will collapse. And even if it does, we are still going to have to man up in order to build society up again.

So now that I have thoroughly pissed off both sides, I will end this piece on a positive note.

Just because Game focuses on sex does not mean that is ALL there is to Game. Game has many TOOLS to defeat feminism, but Game alone will not win the day.

Just because MRAs seem to hint you are going to have to grow up and stop hunting pussy does not mean you have to abandon the hedonistic lifestyle you have come to love and enjoy living. It does mean you are going to have to question the MORALITY of your life and if that is the BEST WAY for a man (and woman) to live. What you choose is left up to you. You are your own man.

It means men are going to have to TAKE BACK what “man up” means and redefine itself in MASCULINE terms. Of course, if men truly believe they have no responsibility to society and women at all… humanity is truly lost, because women are not going to do it.

I may have a way that a man can do all the above and not be seen to have capitulated or given up any ground of autonomy, independence or, most importantly, respect, that each camp claims to have the final word on.

A way that a man can both incorporate Game into his life AND demand the respect and recognition of masculinity in leading society back to sanity that only MEN are going to be able to enforce.

You under 30′s are the future.

I want your life to be about more than Game and sexing women… and more than fighting feminism and declaring war on women that is being an MRA.

But that brings us to my #3 goal of this essay… and this one is long enough as it is. The answer will take a little bit of time to craft and get right and I know very few will agree with me. But agreement is not my goal. I simply want to show men another path, the middle road, and attempt to get masculinity and manning up back on the true path.

That is assuming of course I am not banned outright from both communities after this post. If you really want to fight… THIS is what the men’s movement should look like to a feminist.

Any questions?

The whole point of my Man vs. God series is to get men to start thinking about the fundamental questions of life:

1. Why are we here?
2. How did it all come to be?

To those wondering why Maximus is writing on “this stupid crap,” it is not to get anyone to change their minds about what they believe, merely question themselves. If an atheist wants to stay an atheist, go right ahead. If a Christian reads Islamic arguments about God and man and it strengthens their faith in Christ’s message, even better.

What is important is the exercising of the MORAL MUSCLE — to start questioning one’s fundamental values and beliefs about the world. Many consider such questioning irrelevant. “Who cares?” is a very common refrain today, especially among the under-30 set. And I can understand why they believe as they do. What in this world of corruption and lies would ever give them reason to believe asking moral questions is important? Our politicians are snakes. The bankers are literally the Antichrist on earth. Corporations are psychopaths and their pathology is infecting the entire human psyche the globe over. Governments have become tyrannical zombies whose only consent over the governed is greater and greater use of force to get “compliance.” We have reached an Orwellian turning point in man’s history where people hear the words “bombing to protect” and actually BELIEVE this is possible!

I would argue that just because moral questions and just and right conduct is so absent from the world today, it is up to us, the men OUTSIDE the Matrix…to begin to ask these questions and have answers ready for the sheep when the shit hits the fan and the chaos of collapse is exploding all over the world.

One of those questions is going to be why all this shit and evil was allowed to happen in the first place.

What is the nature of evil? Why does it exist? How can God allow evil to exist if he is all loving and good?

While it may be difficult to believe….consider the following:

Would men today be united in common purpose over the internet to right the world and establish some fundamental human decency and respect GLOBALLY…if feminism had never happened?  Think about that for a minute. No feminism. Would In Mala Fide exist? Would I be writing for Ferdinand? Would you be reading this crap? Would we men have such a common and universal bonding glue for change without feminism? How many men have swallowed the red pill and CAN NEVER GO BACK?Would we men know today what we do about ourselves, about the nature of women, without all the shit that feminism has unleashed on the world?

What I am saying is this: WE DON’T KNOW what the end result is going to be of this mess. Looking back a hundred years from now, it may be seen as the blessing that ushered in a new renaissance for man.  A time when men came together and through reason and science, finally nailed down what being a man is, as well as what being a woman is.  Without the lies of feminism, we may never have discovered the truth about man.  Or, it could also be the great unravelling, total chaos and tyranny.  Whose to say?

But for those that believe the wrongs of feminism and the shit that the world is engulfed in is forever permanent. That a way back to sanity is impossible.  Here is my nerdy argument for hope.

Premise IV: The atheist claim that God/religion is responsible for all evil in the world is false.

I have already proven much of the above premise to be true in prior arguments, but I will review them in brief once again before going to the heart of the atheist claim above.

As I have demonstrated in Premise III, the atheist claim that getting rid of God will end tyranny and oppression is a complete and total lie. It is nothing more than a fantasy supported by ignorant claims and ideas against God and religion in the life of man. The supporting evidence I presented clearly shows atheism leads to oppression and tyranny of a kind FAR WORSE than any evidence of it due to belief in God and religion. If man must choose between two kinds of oppression and tyranny, I am going with the one that at least offered man the opportunity to extricate himself out from it (i.e. the constitutional, democratic West), not totally subjugate him to it (i.e. totalitarian Communist Russia and China).

I have also shown in Premise II that belief in God has brought man out of the cave and into the skyscraper via the emergence of patriarchal, monotheistic religion. In doing so, I have shown how atheism’s claimed return to a more “spiritual” philosophy will also usher in a return to the very tribal tyranny of an alpha elite they espouse to eradicate from man’s historical evolutionary development. Atheism will retrogress man back to the cave and goddess/spirit worship will once again rule over all.

With historical, political and religious claims refuted on God being responsible for evil, we are left with the metaphysical claim that God is responsible for all evil in the world and it is as follows:

God…if He exists, if He is perfect, and if He is all loving, all powerful, all knowing and and all merciful…would not allow suffering to exist. It is illogical. Since evil and suffering does exist, God most not be all that he says He is. Therefore, man must logically conclude that God does not exist.

For those not familiar with religious traditions and whose only knowledge is that of their own prejudicial upbringing or superficial reading of religious sources and commentary, one can understand how an atheist can come to this conclusion.

The Islamic tradition has an answer for this question that completely refutes the above claim. It is as follows (I have used the analogy of a software program in places to make things clear, I hope):

• God is one, all loving, all merciful.
• God is wholly outside his creation (i.e. the programmer, not the program itself). He is connected to it (he wrote the code) but He is not dependent on His creation in any way (the code runs without his input).
• Since God is outside his creation and not dependent on it, his creation is left to execute and run by itself as any software program or operating system does. However, because he is connected (i.e. he can watch the code run in real time), he can continually monitor and know everything that is going on in the program.
• Since man was created in God’s image, he is CAPABLE of achieving the same state and qualities of God (by creating and running his own sub-program, i.e. his life choices), but only within the limited, material created realm of his existence. Therefore, man cannot become God himself, only emulate God to the best of his divine ability to apprehend and come to know God and his qualities.
• That means man’s free will and inherent goodness is also in the image of God. But, being the created and not the creator, his free will to choose is not entirely his own and his goodness is subject to decay and corruption. Man has laws and rules that govern him, just like the rest of creation. (Think of a programmer placing limits on what variables can be created and there values, or even allowing for all possibilities but placing within the program of man a ceiling or wall that he will crash into if he goes too far.)
• Therefore, man’s choice and free will is his own, but only within and to the degree that he conforms and submits to the programming that is asked of him by his creator. This is the paradox of man being both free and determined at the same time that many struggle to understand. To a computer programmer, especially of operating systems, this is not that difficult to imagine. Programs are allowed to run totally free and independent within an operating system but only if they don’t violate the rules of the OS (and in a good OS like UNIX, programs are isolated and hopefully don’t take down other programs with them if they crash). Man can choose, but he can only choose from the paths God presents to him (i.e. his fate). No matter the choice, man can choose the RIGHT path, or the WRONG path in every instance.
• In being free to choose to follow God and his divine laws or not, man is therefore 100% responsible for any and all evil and sin he commits in the created world, not God. (It is very rare that the operating system is the cause of a program crash. Usually, the program has gone outside the OS’s parameters and crashes itself.) The good and right path being the path TOWARD God. The wrong and sinful path being the turning away from God by TEMPTATIONS AND TRIALS that come with being a part of the created world, NOT because God wants evil or allows it. (An operating system is not designed to crash programs! In fact, a good OS does its best to keep programs in line!)
• As a created being with a purpose (i.e. divine rules and laws to follow), if man exercises his free will to go against God’s programming and choose sin and vice, he will bring harm to himself and God’s creation (program crash, even system crash if bad enough).
• If man continually and brazenly keeps choosing to do wrong, this naturally brings about consequences, the ultimate of which is total shutdown of the system by the programmer (i.e. the program is sandboxed in isolation from others, but even then, others may be affected and the whole system can fail… that is, man will go extinct).
• Since man is the one that commits the error against his programming, it is not God’s fault that sin, suffering  and evil exists in the world. It is merely the execution of the program, now with sub-optimal sub-programs that adversely affect the operation of the other programs, possibly the main program itself (i.e man)… but never the operating system (i.e creation/the universe). This is very much in keeping with Buddhist thought on the nature of karma. It is just “the program” working, and therefore, you cannot ascribe moral culpability to God for allowing bad things to happen. (Don’t blame Bill Gates! Heh.)

The atheist argument that because man can choose to disobey his programming shows God is not perfect, is not omnipotent, and is not omnipresent, fails to understand the fundamental spiritual purpose that God created man for… to be in God’s image. That man CAN be the apex, the pinnacle, the crowning achievement of creation, a loving all merciful being…  IF he chooses to follow his divine purpose which he was created for. The allowance within the program of man to go wrong is the test by which man can show God he is up to the near divine status that he was bestowed with upon creation. A programmer always writes code for a purpose. There is no meaningless code. Otherwise, what would be the point of writing a program in the first place? A moral agent is not moral if he or she cannot CHOOSE to do wrong as equally as he can choose to do right. The choice to do wrong and sin or commit evil HAS TO BE in the code!

I want this to be clear… so I am making it so.

JUST BECAUSE the choice to choose evil is built into the program… does not mean GOD is responsible for evil.

The only responsibility one can claim of God, is that he ALLOWED MAN FREE WILL to choose to do evil.

But… that is EXACTLY what the code of man is programmed for… MORAL REASONING AND CHOICE.

Therefore, if MAN chooses to commit evil, it is NOT GOD’S FAULT. MAN is the one that choose the evil path, not God.  God only gave man free will and the ability to choose.

For the atheist, this choice to do wrong and evil is proof God does not exists and is not “perfect and good.” Why would God allows such a choice for man? For a philosophy toward life that claims to FREE man from the delusion of religion, atheism is incredibly ignorant about WHY man was created and for what purpose. Man is a moral agent — if he can’t choose between GOOD and EVIL, he ceases to be a moral agent.

Don’t blame the code or the programmer, it is only doing what it was programed to do by God… make man into a moral being. Angels cannot disobey God, nor can they choose to obey… they simply obey. Man… can choose, and therein lies his divinity and relation to God his creator, who chose to create man in his own image.

Therefore, blaming God and religion for all the evil and suffering that exists in the world is man’s way of completely avoiding and denying responsibility for his willed actions of disobedience in material creation (i.e. Earth).

Blaming God for all the ills of mankind is like blaming the weather. Don’t blame the system for doing what it was designed to do.

God is not responsible for evil in the world.

Man is.

An atheist may still try to argue that the very existence of suffering, and God’s allowance of it, just makes no sense. How can one account for it?

The answer? (And one I know atheists will balk at.)

That is the purpose of the program. Period.

To show God that man is a divine and good creation, he can and must choose to do right and good. If not, then man is judged and found wanting, bringing about his own attendant suffering and punishment on judgement day. All of nature abides by the laws of their creator, but for some reason, man balks at such a request of himself by God. If an atheist does not like being tested, guess what? There is nothing he can do about it! Even karma in Buddhism, which many atheists turn to for spiritual practice (if so inclined) after abandoning God, doesn’t let you get away with anything. That IS the program. That is God’s purpose for man on earth… to be tested. Man cannot turn and run the other way. This is the total denial and utter blindness that is anyone who claims to be an atheist and declares the existence of evil and suffering to prove God does not exist and cannot be all loving/good even if he does.

There is a Sufi tradition that beautifully describes how man’s turning away from God is the source of evil and sin and all that is wrong in the world, not God.

God, the light and source of all that is pure, good and just in the world, is like the sun. When you stare at the sun, it is blinding, all consuming, wholly pure and singularly good. The sun has a horizon which man can turn to, face God and move toward on earth.  Or, man can turn his back and walk away from the horizon and God toward darkness. The further man walks away from the sun and the horizon, the longer the shadows created upon the material world and man’s soul. In these shadows, man errors. If man keeps distancing himself from the light of the sun, the greater the shadows get, the greater and more frequent are his errors, until finally night falls and man is left in utter darkness, no ability to choose right from wrong because he can no longer see. Moral choice is now denied him and he walks spiritually, ethically and morally blind. He is also beyond saving at this point and this is why, in the Koran, it states that God also wills man’s disobedience and condemnation. Not because God is cruel and commanded man to do evil, therefore “destining” him for hellfire, but because man CHOSE to turn and run so far away from God, his programming allows him to make no other choice but to choose evil the further and further away from the light he turns! Even Buddhists say this. This is what happens when man turns away from God — he turns away from the event horizon that is his divine nature if he were to pursue the sun (God) to its very edge. Because man was given choice and can turn and run away from God, man finds himself in ever increasing darkness until, that is all there is… evil on every side and no way back.

The sun, God, is what it is and can be no other. Evil, Satan, only exists if man allows himself to be drawn into shadow. This is why Satan is always a tempter or whisperer in man’s life. Satan has ZERO control over man and cannot command him to do anything. Man must CHOOSE to sin, and only when he does, has he gone astray from God’s programming. For which, God has safeguarded his creation by isolating such an evil man and ensures his ultimate destruction. Yes, some good people are corrupted or violated by the evil some men do, but the program as a whole, man and creation, is good and for a purpose. Again, many atheists simply refuse to accept such a premise about man and God’s purpose for the universe.

If an atheist cannot see this, I would suggest it is because he has become so enshrouded by shadow he can no longer see the light. Which is why you can never convince a true atheist that God exists. He has willfully turned away from God’s light and mercy and will forever be blind and condemned. Yet even then, God’s mercy is boundless. We see this every morning at sunrise. You cannot stop the sun from rising. Man can at any time, should he somehow remember or be reminded, even as blind as he is, turn back to God. The more often he does, the brighter and more clear will be his vision, just like the emerging rays of morning as day MUST begin and come into being. Soon, he will see all the good that is God’s creation and himself.

No matter what direction man chooses to walk, God, already knows and has made it so. Man chooses his destiny, and when he looks back with wisdom, he will see there was really no choice in his life at all.  Atheists, being control freaks, cannot live with this profound spiritual truth.  This is why denying God is an act of total and willful disobedience on the part of man. It is the denial of God’s divine purpose for man. An act which God already knows is possible and has already prepared a judgement and punishment for man should he choose. And the punishment is severe, for what else could someone expect when offered total peace and happiness… and they choose to turn away from it. The judgement of hellfire is really only due justice for someone that turns away from all that is good and right in the world.

Peter Joseph and the atheist Zeitgeist movement has made the classic error of correlation leading to causation. Just because God and religion co-existed alongside war and bankster tyranny does NOT mean that God/religion is the CAUSE.

This argument is truly hard for atheists to digest. No matter how plainly you put this refutation to an atheist, he will simply balk at the idea man can choose to do wrong and that all of life is a trial. “How can God do such a thing? What kind of sadist is God to submit man to such conditions?”

Look… you don’t have to take my word for it, not even Islam’s. Native Americans on another continent who have no connection to any monotheistic tradition understand “the law.” The law is the law… it will show no mercy if you disobey.

For those who may be interested, the above argument was found in this book, The Garden of Truth:

This book answered every question I have ever had about God and man on Earth that Christianity left as a big blank and if pressed, answered “have faith.” Faith is not required when you have the answers. The Sufi tradition says that if you truly know God, there is no faith. Faith… is only for those that do not know.

In this piece, I look to history to discover what the LEGACY between a belief in God vs. atheism has left on man. I have pulled no punches on God or religion. There are truly horrible episodes of religious conflict that I hope are never repeated. But as you will learn, atheism as a belief system will entrench violence, tyranny and oppression in a way God is not even remotely capable of. If you have not read them, here are Part 1 and Part 2 of this series.

Premise III: Atheism as a foundation for rebuilding society will lead only to tyranny and oppression.

While atheists are quick to point out the violent atrocities committed in the name of God throughout history, they ignore completely the atheist Marxist and Communist movements to remove the “opiate of the masses” that is state-sanctioned religion and the deaths that resulted from these particular utopian philosophies.

If one wants to get into a pissing contest as to whose philosophy/religion/ideology killed more of humanity than the other, go right ahead. I for one would declare it a useless argument. What is NOT a useless pissing contest is asking what was the end result of these God vs. no God historical social experiments. What was the LEGACY each philosophy left for examination and judgement by the greatest of judges…time.

This is, in essence, the fundamental difference between science and God. Science can only measure stuff and give us empirical data. It is man’s judgement as to what is right and good that makes him divine. You can’t measure quality. Science cannot compute a value judgement.

So…what can time tell us about belief in God vs. atheism?

Religion is politics and politics is religion for most of man’s history. There is no difference between the two, slim at best.  Therefore, all of the wars and genocides committed “in the name of God” are entirely political in nature, not religious or sanctioned in any way by God. This can be clearly shown in history if anyone looks to the actual beliefs of the so-called popes or kings of Rome and Europe who committed horrors on their believing (and non-believing) subjects. None of them, from Constantine to Henry the VIII, actually believed in their hearts in the oneness of God and his divinely good, loving nature. If they had, they would never have invoked the name of God to justify war and empire.

For example, I’m currently watching The Tudors series from Showcase on DVD. Henry VIII was a very devout man to the Catholic faith…until he wanted a divorce from Catherine. Suddenly, Rome no longer spoke for God on Earth. The King decided his voice and command was that of God, or at least according to Martin Luther’s arguments for Protestantism. Luther’s arguments were entirely from scripture which stated that no one comes between man and his maker. It was the direct appeal to God, a HIGHER AUTHORITY than the Pope in Rome, that allowed Henry the VIII to free himself from papal control as a vassal state of the Holy See. While the rest of Europe floundered under papal rule, England went on to become a world power and it was all due to Henry’s claim that no man was above him except God. Note as well that Germany was also one to throw off the yoke of Rome and it too went on to become a world power, and to this day remains one of Europe’s strongest nations.

So while we can see Henry’s appeal to God was based on religious interpretation of scripture, we can also see that ultimately it was a political act. But without God, what higher authority could Henry have turned to? An atheist might say, “Why, I turn to myself, just like Henry VIII did!” But what weight does that authority hold over other men? None. In fact, because an atheist looks only to himself, he can also DENY a man any right to assert his liberty because, well, I won’t let you. Say fini!

This is precisely what my atheist friends refuse to see about the moral and ethical problems inherent to a belief system that says there is no higher authority than man. That makes every man God, so he can do whatever he wants.  An atheist can claim to have a moral code, but upon what is its foundation for authority? Only himself. Therefore, morality becomes whatever a man wants or believes it to be. An atheist is all politics. There is no one to hold an atheist to account for anything. This is PRECISELY the legacy and fruit of atheist belief. Sure, King Henry VIII was the epitome of my way or the highway, but he WAS CHECKED…by God…within his own conscience, by his church, by his believing ministers and the most powerful of all…the believing masses of his subjects. He could not get away with just ANYTHING. He had subjects to hold him to account and those people, including himself, all believed God was the final judge. That there were divine laws EVERY MAN must obey and no man was above. Atheists may claim this is a mere trick of the mind, but even if so, a trick of the mind does not make it any less powerful. Atheism has no trick of the mind to check man’s actions. Man can do whatever he wants.

We can also see this political colouring of religion in Islam. I went in search of Muslim atrocities to see what I could find. The Thracian Genocide of Christians by the Turks between 1914 and 1923 during the 1st world war is on record as being truly merciless. There is also the more recent mass genocide in India when East Pakistan separated and become Bangladesh in 1971.  There even appears to be the template of the Nazi holocaust in Armenia by the Turks in 1915 to 1923, the same time period as the Thracian Genocide. That one was truly stunning in its scope and I have not heard of it before in my life. The only saving grace for Islam is that so far, in my limited search, I have found only Muslim atrocities committed in the 20th century, the largest of which being committed during conditions of outright war across the globe – i.e. political genocides. If anyone has any historical evidence of mass Islamic murder campaigns in the early empire period (prior to 1200 AD), I would appreciate the information and welcome it in the comments. I am not going to hide anything about Islam.

That said, it should be noted that the 20th century Islamic genocides were all committed by the Ottoman Empire which was given a distinct name for a reason – it was not a direct extension of the original Islamic Caliphate system. The Ottoman Empire came after the Mongols’ utter and total destruction of the founding Islamic leaders and centres of politics, faith and learning. The British Empire also at some point had its claws in almost every corner of the globe stirring up conflict and oppression and no doubt had a strong influence on Turkish politics of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries.

While this may seem like a digression from the topic at hand…it actually serves a purpose.

In researching death and murder committed under Muslim rule, I did find a ray of light that an atheist is going to find very difficult to refute on how effective the belief in God can be in STOPPING wholesale genocide. That without God, the world would be awash in wholescale violence, tyranny and oppression…indeed, we are starting to move in that direction already in the middle east and the “War” on Terror.

Rwanda.

That was by any measure pure genocide. There was no religion that started it and there is barely even a hint of politics behind it as it was strictly an IDENTITY CARD CAMPAIGN separating farmers from cattle owners, that was all it took. Wrong card, and you got the machete. Brutal and cold blooded as Canadian General Romeo Dallaire witnessed first hand as the mission head for UN Peaceleepers in Rwanda at the time. His account can be read in his cathartic book Shake Hands With the Devil, and also in the excellent movie re-enactment of the same name.

So…where is the light in this diversionary tale? (And I thank you for your indulgence.)

Islam…was a small faith in the country of Rwanda at the time of the genocide, almost non-existent. It is rising now faster then ever, mosques overflowing, and playing a part in healing wounds and bringing forgiveness to that country. Why is Islam growing in Rwanda?  In their own words:

During the genocide, Muslims were among the few Rwandans who protected both neighbors and strangers. Elsewhere, many Hutus hunted down or betrayed their Tutsi neighbors and strangers suspected of belonging to the minority.

But the militiamen and soldiers didn’t dare go after Tutsis in Muslim neighborhoods like Biryogo, said Yvette Sarambuye, a 29-year-old convert. ”If a Hutu Muslim tried to kill someone hidden in our neighborhoods, he would first be asked to take the holy Quran and tear it apart to renounce his faith,” said Sarambuye, a Tutsi widowed mother of three who survived the slaughter by hiding with Muslims. “No Muslim dared to violate the holy book, and that saved a lot of us.”

For many Hutu extremists, Muslims were regarded as a group apart, not to be targeted in the genocide.

Muslims take God and the Quran VERY seriously. They don’t have faith or belief…they KNOW God exists and that his word came down to man through the holy prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

You will note that while Muslim Hutus did partake in the slaughter, but when they were confronted by their own religious community and asked to leave Islam because it forbids the killing of innocents, they put down their machetes, at least in Muslim neighborhoods. Islam saved lives…by the Koran alone. In contrast to the Christian majority that the country is now moving away from, the Bible did not save anyone as a holy book:

Although the Christian clergy in many communities struggled to protect Tutsis and often died with them, more than 20 Roman Catholic and Protestant priests, nuns and pastors are facing charges related to the killings. Rwandan courts already have convicted two Catholic priests and sentenced them to death.

For the record, I did not go looking for this…it found me in researching Muslim atrocities in order to be balanced and fair since most of the arguments against God and religion are aimed squarely at Christians. However, if this is the power of Islam in a small African village during the most evil and devil inspired genocide in man’s history, I think that says a lot about just how seriously Muslims take their faith.

It also says a lot about the POWER of the CONCEPT of God to hold man accountable for his actions TO A HIGHER AUTHORITY, which is something I am articulating in this long series. It was the fear of God, not Jesus, that protected Tutsis in Muslim Rwandan villages. It was the explicit call to not kill innocents in the Koran and the hellfire that awaited those that did. For a so called Satanic book that Christians claim the Koran to be, as well as its so called Satanic founder Muhammad (PBUH), in a country with blood LITERALLY running in the streets…the message of the Koran and the small Muslim community spared countless lives that would otherwise have been lost as there was no sanity to be found anywhere during that black time in Rwanda’s history…except if you found yourself in a Muslim village.

If readers wonder why I keep coming back to Islam, it is because I keep finding stories like this. In fact, look at what happened when radical Islam heard they had new recruits in town…and oh look…from Pakistan no less with DEEP CIA ties to Al-Qaeda and 9/11:

“After the genocide, a small group of Islamic fundamentalists, funded by Pakistanis who flew to Rwanda frequently, took control of a mosque and started to organize themselves,” he said. “But they were kicked out by the official Muslim organization concerned about the spread of radical Islam.”

In the heart of God’s country, inspired by God’s word…CIA inspired radical Islam will find no roots because a TRUE Muslim and Islamic community rejects terrorism and its aims completely.

But I won’t leave Islam on the high note. Here now, a ray of light and a nod to my Christian friends.

It was in Christian England through the power of reason and conviction that William Wilberforce led a movement to abolish slavery in the colonies. His argument was simple and direct…man is a slave to no one except God. Protestant Christian principles of freedom to worship as one chooses and the love and compassion of Christ extended to ALL men are what brought about an end to the single worst legacy of British colonial rule. No need to really go into any further detail as this period in history is widely documented for all to research for themselves.

So, my atheist friends…are you seeing the arrow in history when a belief in a loving and merciful God is adopted by man?

When Judaism, Christianity and Islam came onto the world stage, they brought with them respectively:

1. Law.
2. Love and mercy.
3. Truth and conflict resolution.

In practice, the belief in one God began to move man on a slow, evolutionary march toward establishing the Western political systems we have today that derive from – the principle argument for the rule of law, with allowance for forgiveness and mercy according to circumstance, and a system of non-violent conflict resolution for disputes between men via THE courts, based on the truthful testimony of witnesses, the impartiality of judges and the responsibility of juries to use reason and evidence in determining guilt and meting out punishment.

In the case of Rwanda, a belief in God, the FEAR of God in violating a book they believe to be the true word of God…also saved lives in a time of absolute evil and darkness. All of this was accomplished over a long period of time within a society enslaved by the “opiate of the masses,” God and religion, or so the atheists would have us believe.

While the belief in God brought about many deaths due to differences in religious belief, I believe I have shown most of them were political in nature and in no way can reflect a true belief in God. Therefore, most of those deaths were the actions of men working out WHICH LAWS they wished to agree with and abide by in peace (i.e. politics). It was bloody, but it got us to where we are today…republican, democratic rule. There was a method to the madness…a divine purpose if you will allow me to propose…and the goal was more peaceful and loving co-existence between tribes not of ones own based on common faith and belief.

In contrast… let us examine the genocides, tyrannies and oppressions attributed to atheism.

Let’s remove the opiate of the masses from man’s governance of himself and see if he behaves any better toward his fellow man.  What we will see is that, with a blink of the eye in terms of time (barely a hundred years), atheism as a belief system has committed as many if not more horrors than religion could ever begin to muster a challenge to in this pissing contest of “who is the worst” I opened this article with. At the same time, you will note the decline in religious tyranny and oppression in religious countries as the tolerance preached by the belief in God continued to spread, while in atheist countries, tyranny and oppression took on a heightened vigour and force the likes of which man has never witnessed in his history.

The communist revolution in Russia, by any metric of measurement you apply to it, was one of the bloodiest revolutions in history. These deaths were that of Russian against Russian, not state against state (i.e. tribe vs tribe which is what political states emerged from). Therefore, the atheist communist atrocities and genocides were carried out by a state AGAINST ITS OWN PEOPLE.

Religious conflict, while also carried out against its own people at times, can at least be attributed to differences in politics and belief about how to live, or just plain outright might vs. right I-want-what-you-have… but they ALWAYS had to JUSTIFY there actions in the name of God (i.e. that there was some higher moral or divine principle at stake). While deluded, this can at least be excused and we can allow that many people killed and were killed by men at least THINKING they were trying to create a better world. The same argument could be said of Marxism and Communism, they too were fighting to establish a better way for man to live, a utopia on earth without some menacing and judgmental God. Again, I ask my atheist friends to judge the LEGACY left by these ideologies when compared to the belief in God. Would the Communist Manifesto held up to a Hutu, regardless of faith, have stopped him from hacking to death his Tutsi brother in Rwanda?

So what is that legacy? What did Communism lead to? What was the result of Russia moving from a religious, feudal state straight to, do not pass Go, a communist state? Did the Russian people attain the material and spiritual freedom and progress that the Christian or Islamic (for its time) world did?

The answer is a resounding no.  The Communist purges and incarcerations, which I need not remind you were also about rooting out religion in society as Peter Joseph advocates in his Zeitgeist film, killed more people than the entire Czarist religious oligarchy before it:

According to the declassified Soviet archives, during 1937 and 1938, the NKVD detained 1,548,366 victims, of whom 681,692 were shot – an average of 1,000 executions a day (in comparison, the Tsarists executed 3,932 persons for political crimes from 1825 to 1910 – an average of less than 1 execution per week).

And these numbers do not include the Communist revolution itself!

Here is just a sample of the easiest research one can do on the historical results of adopting an atheist world view of man and society.

• Communist Revolution
• Russian Civil War
• Soviet Union History
• Communist Mass Killings

Remember, my atheist friends, communism was not about class struggle. The primary driver of class struggle was the struggle of man to free himself from the RELIGIOUS system of OPPRESSION AND TYRANNY that the bourgeois elite belonged to! The end result was precisely what they said they were fighting against…absolute tyranny and oppression. There is no history of rule of law by democratic vote in any communist regime. No charter of human rights. No freedom of speech and assembly. Any voting that may have taken place within a communist regime was for appearances only, the outcome already determined before hand by the small inner circle of “the party.” There is also the cult of silence, spying and reporting on one’s neighbors for ‘subversive thinking’ (i.e. for not thinking the way the party wants you to think, for after all, man now determines what other men can think, not God). Granted, the Inquisitions could be said to be the same thing, but they were ONLY Inquisitions. They were limited in scope and were an aberration of Christian history, not a founding principle and guiding force. The Stasi, the KGB et al. were state INSTITUTIONS of ORGANIZED oppression and tyranny for “man’s own good, to protect him from himself.”

Communist deaths were the result of an attitude that society must be DESTROYED so a utopia can be created. This is the very core of Marx’s argument to eliminate class struggle…that the current social order must be entirely thrown out because the whole system is a lie and corrupt, replaced with an entirely MAN MADE system. I ask you to go back and re-read the transcript from the Zeitgeist film from Premise I earlier and see how eerily Peter Joseph and others sound like Marx speaking from the grave. There is no thinking that one can IMPROVE or CHANGE the system for the better, only its destruction and replacement… with what? Some brain fart idea of a scientific, classless society of plenty and ease, devoid of the mind-numbing cult of religious oppression and violence?

In contrast, every Judeo-Christian nation eventually evolved into some form of republican, constitutional democracy where each man slowly gained more and more rights and freedoms from the elites that used to oppress and tyrannize him in the past. Even in Islam, though in history antithetical to democracy, is now undergoing its own revolution in religious politics as can be seen in Turkey and the rest of the Arab world now in an uprising against western hegemonic interests.

But while the Islamic Empire had no direct democracy as we know it today, there was voting and a respect for individual rights (including the rights of women to divorce and receive maintenance and support and not be left destitute) was enshrined in Koranic revelation and Sharia law since man was under no one’s jurisdiction or authority other than God’s. The Koran was more than a religious text, it was a whole way of life for Muslims. They don’t pretend religion has nothing to do with politics as we do in the West. They realize that man’s belief about the creation of the universe and himself has a FUNDAMENTAL bearing on how man decides to live his life in the company of other men. Much of the legal system the West uses today came out of the jurisprudence practices and innovations of Islamic courts while Europe languished in the Dark Ages until the Renaissance.(Which again, imported the intellectual foundations of democracy and rule of law from Arabic texts that preserved the original Greek philosophical works, lost to Europe under persecution of the Catholic Church.)

So…are we done pissing? Are we ready to come to a VALUE judgement? Can we come to a conclusion on the historical record between religious and atheist forms of man’s governance in terms of quality of life OVERALL?

I think we can conclude that while religious traditions, using the name of God as political cover, have committed much oppression and tyranny, atheism under the Communist banner committed far WORSE atrocities since they were committed in the name of NOTHING! Nothing, that is, other than a man made philosophy about how he should organize and govern himself outside the purview of God’s divine law since He does not exist. Man governing himself does not seem to have worked out all that well for him when he removed God from the equation.

We can also conclude the truly horrible atrocities committed in the name of God and religion are for the most part in man’s medieval history. Sadly, Islam is the odd man out here with its 20th century crimes, but at least in scope, they were not century long episodes that waxed and waned like the Christian conflicts were and can truly be called ‘secular’ in the sense that they were political acts committed primarily in the secular 20th century when a true Islamic Caliphate state did not exist by any historical definition of the term.

Therefore, we can safely assert that any religious wars and deaths committed today by a nation are, for the most part, committed by modern secularists and atheists (who have long since abandoned any religious faith in God) and have been since the beginning of the 20th century (and assuredly are in the 21st). The jihadist deaths committed by the Taliban and al-Qaeda are not to be dismissed, but in relation to the atheist/secular West’s campaign to wipe out Islam and its people in the Middle East? Self-defense is not an altogether outrageous claim to make. Which would be true if most of the “terrorism” today was not outright orchestrated and initiated by the secret intelligence agencies of the West in outright collusion to impose a one-world communist government on the whole of mankind.

The argument that religion has caused nothing but war, violence and death…only applies to a period in time that is at minimum 400+ years in the past. Even then, they can be clearly seen to be POLITICAL in nature, not guided by true principles of religion and God. Today, in the 21st century, all war and murder is committed in the name of one and only one thing…power, control, money and profit…politics. As it ever was, how it shall ever be.

So? Have I proven that atheism as a foundation for rebuilding society will lead only to violent and genocidal tyranny and oppression? While open to greater debate and refutation in the comments, I think I can safely assert that this premise is true.

No matter how hard we try, it always comes back to the babes. Heh.

Ok, first I want to thank JM for his vigorous participation in Part I of my Man vs God series. We disagreed on…pretty much everything, but that is as it should be.  The truth is never found in blind conformity.

Second, I am not asking you to believe in God. Not at all. Just the intellectual concept that God represents to the men’s movement. Without it, as I will show in this article series, man is headed back to the cave…in chains.

As a quick introduction to Part II, this article series is about proving the atheist movement around the world, articulated best in the Zeitgeist series by founder Peter Joseph, is a retrogressive step back in time for man. It will impose a top-down scientific dictatorship mankind has never seen in his entire existence. I feel it is vitally important to expose this now more than ever because should such a technological system be put in place, it will prove very hard to overturn. Thankfully, I have brought no children into this world to see such a future and I am doing my part to hopefully prevent such a future from taking shape for those that will have to live under it.

So, without further ado…Part II.

Premise II: The Zeitgeist argument for a universal ‘spirituality’ and nature worship to replace God/religion is retrogressive to man’s future development.

If man ever wanted to know just who is responsible for imposing tyranny and dictatorship on this earth, he need look no further than his own reflection. And if he looked really close, he would find a female behind him with a whip and himself in leg irons to keep him in his place!

God is not responsible for anything bad that happens on this earth. He merely created it and gave man free will – live in peace and harmony, or die in violence and conflict. To blame God for all the woes of the world is incredibly myopic and naive to the true spirit and history of the world’s religious traditions.

But how do I show that atheism and the rejection of God will retrogress man back to the cave?

One of Miyamoto Mushashi’s nine precepts of strategy is the following…

Pay attention even to trifles.

At this early point, I would like to give Peter Joseph full opportunity to express his side of the debate about the future social, political, economic and spiritual organization of mankind.  Here is an RT interview with him about the Zeitgeist movement he founded where he is allowed a good length of time to introduce his ideas and why they should be adopted by humanity at large.

The trifle we need to pay attention to does not actually come from Peter’s mouth for he has many good things to say. This trifle will be immediately recognized, understood and come to no surprise to those of us here at In Mala Fide who understand that feminism, and a return to a goddess/matriarchal organization of society, is really what is going on in the world today. The trifle I shall use to begin my refutation comes from the RT news babe’s pretty mouth at precisely 11:02 and I quote:

“I don’t want to go back and work the land.  I love what I do.  I’m a journalist.  I enjoy it a lot.  I am not just going to GIVE THAT UP.  So how do you actually make what you are taking about happen?” [11:02]

I have been accused by many of making grand, sweeping, all-encompassing generalizations about world events, society and culture based on but the smallest snippets of personal observation, someone’s head twitch, a book quote extrapolated way out of proportion to its context or even this – a simple enough personal comment and question from a talking-head, news babe journalist.

But we have to put this simple question and personal statement by the RT babe in its proper context, in relation to the utopian Zeitgeist theories Peter espouses and how and why she, as a female, may be interested to learn more about them.

A female by nature will always look for the next male who will offer her more comfort and privilege, without any expenditure of labour or sweat on her part, as long as she does not have to give up the level of ease and leisure she is extracting from her current male slave.

So…what has this women’s simple confession and question revealed to us? She is not dismissing Peter’s theories, she wants to know how he can make them work. Now, why would she want to know that? I think you will agree, her lead up to her question gives the answer, so let’s look a little closer at her statements. Once we do, I will lay out my argument for why the Zeitgeist movement’s focus on “spirituality” alone without the concept of a creator God is retrogressive for mankind and plays right into the goddess/matriarchy the ladies are refashioning for themselves.

1) I don’t want to work. Period…full stop.

This is the very definition of not wanting to go back to “work the land.” For the entirety of man’s history, working the land to survive is the only task and labour he could not escape once born. To earn their daily bread after being kicked out of the Garden of Eden, both man and woman must now labour, each in their own way, to survive as human beings on planet Earth. Labour, I might add, in gender specific roles of partnership and co-operation, not equality and competition.

The current emergence of a global matriarchy in the West has created a utopian provider in the form of “government” and the communist/socialist beast of government largesse via welfare programs and sustaining those individuals who would otherwise have no choice but to get out and work to survive.

That said, a small caveat must be made that it is the responsibility of society to take care of those less fortunate in life’s trials. I am not advocating every man for himself, merely a return to creating the conditions that maximize every man’s opportunity and ability to work and earn his daily bread. For that, man requires the freedom to choose the labour he wishes to engage in and the protection of law to retain the fruits thereof, free of infringement or obstruction by anyone who wishes to make someone else’s labour their own, turning his fellow man into a slave for their own escape from labour to survive.

While I appreciate the Zeitgeist movement for awakening me to the real state of fiat money, banking and the communist/socialist economic system that is oppressing us (we are NOT capitalist, not even close and have not been for decades if not centuries), the solution he puts forward is nothing less than precisely the one-world-government, elite, Orwellian/Huxley utopian, scientific control of the planet “for man’s own good.”

Is it any wonder that our news babe is intrigued to learn more about such a system?  A perfect slave society of absolute dictatorial oppression and control where she will reap all the benefits without having to lift a finger in labour or work ever again?  “Please… do tell me more!”

2) I want a life of ease and privilege that men slave to provide for me.

I love what I do. I’m a journalist. I enjoy it a lot. I am not just going to GIVE THAT UP.

As we can see…we men have a fight on our hands. The ladies, now with a firm grasp of power via government and other institutions, with men walking around like eunuchs begging for sex even though they are without a member to do so with, are not about to give up what they have enslaved man and much of the world to provide for them.

First, being a journalist used to actually mean something. With the main stream sources for journalism, especially in the visual medium, now being entirely overtaken by babes, we can be assured (and as is the case) that all reporting from now on will be ‘on message.’ Most women, especially Western women, will not rock the boat or make waves in pursuing her ‘professional career’ by doing something masculine like…oh, I don’t know…exposing on live national television EXACTLY what is wrong with America and the world.

That kind of ballsy, risk-taking, status quo snubbing, hypocrisy exposing behaviour, is masculine by nature.  Women are incapable of it…because they do not have the physical nor the spiritual power to assert it as men can. That is not to say women don’t have convictions of their own and speak powerfully for them, it is saying that the majority of women will never risk their meal ticket the way this man did because that would mean – GASP – the risk of hardship and privation for actually standing up for that annoying truth and facts stuff.

We can see this submissive behaviour in the very institutions that train these women to be ‘journalists’ – our university/colleges that have become breeding grounds for robot zombies. Is it any wonder the upper chambers of education have a dearth of male enrollment? This man would be fast-tracked on Ritalin and banned from campus if he were to act in such a manner in class. Why would a male go to any university campus? Men want freedom and an arena where the competition of ideas will be based on truth and merit, not submitting a paper that regurgitates the professor’s/faculty’s ideology. Notice at the end of his so called ‘rant,’ he was still calm and he asked the audience and his colleagues,“Is that a fair assessment?” Even after all of that… he still wanted to know if others agreed with him.

But I digress. This innocent-enough comment needs to be run through the Womanese translator to correctly understand what the news babe has just voluntarily let every male know about what she “loves” about her job.

Under the current, approaching and attempting-to-consolidate one-world-government, this woman has everything she could ever want or need…and has to do little to no work to have it.

She goes to school and does precisely as she is told. She turns in her university papers and exams regurgitating exactly what the ivory tower apparatchiks expect to hear and read from a future cog in the Matrix, thus assuring her place within the accepted society of ‘educated professional.’

She then uses her superior female network and socialization skills (i.e. who-you-know not what-you-know) and her innate desire and ability to submit and conform to structures of hierarchy and authority (usually male dominated at the very top) to enter into the 21st century Matrix of professional career woman. Her skills and abilities are only required to the extent they comply with the hierarchy’s approval and pre-programmed ideological output (i.e. a successful ‘performance’ review). Content, contribution, innovation and productivity are irrelevant.

Everything in her life, from the expresso machine that makes her morning Starbucks pick-me-up, to the satnav in her car negotiating traffic to the studio, to the organic lunch delivered to her office in feel-good environmentally safe plastic, to the universally marketed and girl-approved, lifestyle-perfect ambience of the lounge she frequents after broadcast with the other news babes… is tailored so that she does not have to lift a finger or break even one bead of sweat in either intellectual or physical exertion to earn her ‘daily bread.’

Everything that goes into the PHYSICAL creation and consumption of this woman’s lifestyle…was delivered to her by a man.  I have done some delivery work. Take a day off, get in your car, and drive around the city early in the morning to all the businesses in your area. Look around at all the trucks that carry food, gas, construction materials…ANYTHING that has to be ordered and delivered to be processed into a product to be sold in the global marketplace is delivered by a man. Meanwhile, this woman kicks back in her IKEA chair, web surfing with her iPad for what else she can buy with her ‘professional’ career salary before she has to go live on camera.

Western women today live in a utopia of their making…to the enslavement of men and the rest of humanity (i.e. the third world of occupied resource extraction).

There is NO WAY a woman is going to go back to more freedom and liberty for man…and I do mean for males…if she has to give up the unheard-of-in-history ease and comfort a Western woman has currently extracted from her male slave. Going back to work the land, a career praised as the highest form of service man can do to please God…is not an option for these women. No wonder the babes love atheists!

So… what is the real goal of her questioning Peter Joseph about the Zeitgeist movement?

To wit…

3) “So how do you actually make what you are talking about happen?”

Well news babe, Peter Joseph has offered up just such a future that will make woman’s enthronement as queen and goddess of the world complete.

What I have just described:

• Alpha males at the top (usually psychopathic);
• A harem of dominated alpha females under the alpha male (news babes);
• A few upper tier, absolute beta males that comply with the alpha males and submissive females to enforce their will on humanity, hoping for sloppy-seconds access to some of those top tier females under the alpha’s control;
• The rest of the male/female tribe all working in slavery to raise the children of the so called alpha or elite class (i.e. “it takes a village to raise a child,” which should be correctly recited, “it takes a village of slaves to supply a life of ease and privilege to the elite and their offspring”).

This…is nothing less than the entirety of man’s pre-monotheism, pre-patriarchal, evolutionary history. Hell…when you look at the world honestly…nothing much has really changed even despite the advances patriarchy made on man’s social organization.

This is goddess/matriarchal tribal organization in action.

I am not going to go into the detailed argument and evidence to prove the above assertion, it would take far too long. All I will suggest for those looking for the truth that man dragged humanity out of the cave and into the skyscraper is go and do some research on matriarchal/matrilineal social organization. The best place to start is just about any mammal species you can think of. What you find there, you will also find with pre-historic man if you go looking (i.e. 2000 BC and earlier).

The structural organization of a TRUE matriarchy/matrilineal tribal system (i.e. everything that predates agriculture and the emergence of patriarchy in any form) are the following:

• A pre-dominantly goddess worshipping culture, where male gods played almost no role in the rules/laws of the tribe, and if they did, were seen as pretty much useless when not violent and destructive;
• Pagan worship of ‘spirits’ and ‘intuitive’ goddess/nature knowledge;
• Unquestioning obedience to the authority of the goddess/spirits, who had a nasty habit of making up the rules as they went along. After all, there is NO CONCEPT of a male creator God OUTSIDE man’s perception that imposes ABSOLUTE rules and laws on man. Therefore, the goddess…the CREATOR of life…is all. What she says…goes, and if she happens to change her mind to something else? That new rule is also in play, but it may not overrule the first one, unless she wants it to. You know what? Just obey for now, we’ll see what the rules will be tomorrow.
• To question or change the social organization of the community is not only not allowed, it is not possible because it would be ‘unnatural,’ by which the goddess can not only claim by her divine authority as the creator of life, but by also appealing to the many examples in the nature/spirit world (i.e. the animal world where it is the female that rules all social organization).

If you look to this matriarchal/goddess history…you will see the emergence of patriarchy and monotheism FROM it after thousands, if not millions of years. You will also notice it is WHEN a male creator God came along that man began to lay down RULES AND LAWS that were OUTSIDE his control (and the goddess’ as well) to organize society by. The goddess and her spirit rules/laws were in constant conflict according to their all too human frailties. It was only with a patriarchal male god…that stability and peace are seen as goals to be achieved and the rules that get man there enforced and inviolable. This transition to stable, eternal and peaceful rule by unchanging patriarchal law can be seen in its earliest manifestation in the Hesiod poem Theogeny, where Zeus, in the end, asserts reason and compassion to rule over Olympus and man, banishing the earlier fighting gods who wish to make rules and laws whatever they can impose by force to Tartarus. If you have not read this poem, here is a good translation. In it, you will clearly see a transition of abject violence by BOTH sexes to one of peace and stability in Zeus’ rule by swallowing female wisdom (for he does not deny it) to be incorporated into himself…to rule by BOTH ways of seeing the world…to take in BOTH perspectives.

I think I can now conclude the evidence for my proof of premise II with the following summary:

• Denying God denies the masculine, monotheistic, patriarchal tradition of absolute, unchanging law beyond man’s or woman’s or natures control;
• In its place is only intuitive ‘spirit’ to come to know the laws/rules of social organization, an intuition that is ephemeral at best and in constant flux/change according to human frailties;
• Intuitive spirit knowledge is the essence of goddess/matriarchal social organization in man’s pre-history;
• Goddess/matriarchal social organization was effectively might-is-right – females choosing violent and psychotic alpha males and their buddies to impose their will on the tribe and keep everyone else in submission to supporting their offspring;
• Goddess/matriarchal social organization led only to primitive pagan societies whose material progress and well being was at the level of a cave man for thousands, tens of thousands, millions of years going back to creation itself;
• Therefore, to deny an absolute, other-worldly, masculine God as atheism does and replace it with feminine ‘spirit’ worship (or worse, nothing at all) is to retrogress man back to the social organization of the cave…which was absolute oppression and tyranny of the alpha class, both male and female, on the entire human tribe.

I admit that a much longer and detailed argument for the above is required and I have most of it worked out already with published source data and historical, anthropological evidence. That…is ten times longer than this blog format would allow. If anyone takes the time to research my claim and determine if what I have just asserted is true… they will reach the same conclusion above that I have.

To deny God…a single, creator, male god…and to replace it with feminine ‘spirit’ and ‘nature’ worship or nothing at all…is to return man back to the cave.. a total and complete retrogression and roll back of all the advancement man has achieved in the past 4000+ years of patriarchal innovation in man’s social organization.

Up front, this is not an article for or against religion. I write in the spirit of point/counter-point and will try my best to present both sides of the debate accurately so you can make your own judgement. Neither is it an article for or against government, banking, capitalism/socialism/communism/anarchy or any other combative ideology you can possibly extract from this writing to take pot-shots at. In the course of this article, you will easily come to know what I believe and where I stand, but I will try my best to present my views as just that… my personal views. If I present my case well and demonstrate a winning argument for some people… so be it. My goal is to simply get people to question their assumptions and beliefs and go looking for answers. In times of great crisis and monumental change, it is very easy to swing from one bad ideology to another. While I believe the Zeitgeist movement is a positive one, it has the potential to be a nightmare when examined under the microscope of critical reasoning. We must attempt for the first time in man’s history to avoid such a mistake, because if we don’t, the consequences are far more dire and severe this time round than at any time in man’s history.

This is a long article, and it will be broken down into multiple releases. If you have read any of my previous writings, you will know I am not one to Dummy version my thoughts and musings. This shorter format will allow those with interest in what I have to say to contribute to the discussion in the comments as my argument against atheism as a foundational philosophy for man’s future social organization is revealed over time.

Man vs. God

I don’t know how many will accept my simple thesis that this is the state of the world today. Many will say it has always been thus, atheists will argue the premise is false from the start since there is no God. However, I would ask you to consider the facts of the world today: 1) the banking crisis of 2008 and the coming collapse (or hyper-inflationary new ‘normal’) of the American dollar and all fiat currencies with it 2) the wars for ‘democracy and freedom’ in the Middle East that, despite oil being the superficially obvious goal, are really a secular/atheist (dare I say Satanic? That should bring out the trolls) crusade against God, Islam being the only monotheistic religious tradition that has not been entirely co-opted by Western secularism/materialism/feminism.

If you can agree with the above thesis, even just for arguments sake, we can move forward then and see most of the worlds events and social upheavals as two groups of ideas/beliefs in conflict.  These two forces are as follows:

Secularism/materialism/atheism as represented by the industrial/’capitalist’/democratic first world countries whose social organization is based on the belief of the individual as the central unit of society; one where talk of God and spirituality are avoided at all costs in the majority of social interactions, where ‘the family’ plays no role in society as traditionally thought and gender roles are now viewed as and believed to be a purely cultural construction that restricts the “freedoms” of men and women, especially in regards to sexual/relationship attitudes and practices

 vs

 Islam/God and third world/developing countries that are still more religious/traditional in their spiritual/family orientation toward man’s divine social organization; where God/religion still plays a prominent role in social interaction, who believe the family is the central unit of society, where traditional gender roles are enforced and sexual/relationship promiscuity is still culturally taboo and vigorously restricted via social peer pressure, religious or otherwise

 The Zeitgeist movement as espoused by Peter Joseph is one man’s attempt to solve this very real and pressing conflict in the world today. While many of his ideas and theories are interesting and he has brought to light a great many truths…he is misguided in one very important area…the evils of God and monotheistic religions.

This article is my attempt to refute the main claim of Peter Joseph and the atheist Zeitgeist movement which is as follows:

 That God, religion and money are responsible for all the worlds evil, ills and problems.  If we get rid of God/money, we can create a utopian paradise on earth.

My refutation will proceed in stages via proof of the following premises:

1. That the Zeitgeist movement has atheism as its foundational philosophy, and therefore, all subsequent theories and ideas about man and how he should live are based on this metaphysical foundation.
2. That the Zeitgeist argument for a universal ‘spirituality’ devoid of any concept of God (not the belief/non-belief of, but the concept)is retrogressive to man’s future evolutionary development.
3. That using atheism as the metaphysical foundation to ‘rebuild’ any theory or design for man’s future social organization will only lead to absolute tyranny and oppression.
4. The atheist claim that God/religion is responsible for all evil in the world is false.
5. In denying God, atheist’s turn man into the creator, and therefore try to create a utopian garden of eden on earth, outside God’s laws, since man is now the maker of all laws and therefore master of all creation.
6. That the concept of a single, creator God… not belief/unbelief in one…is vital to the freedom and independence of every man, woman and child on earth and is the very foundation for representative, republican democracy itself.
7. That a resource based economy that eliminates the monetary system entirely is false and only a return to a fair and just system of labour exchange will correct the imbalance and disparity in wealth throughout the world.

In short, I am going to expose the hypocrisy of atheists like Peter Joseph, Richard Dawkins, et al who think they can be God and create a Garden of Eden on Earth in their own image.

Before I begin, I wish to express great respect for Peter Joseph and what he has accomplished with his Zeitgeist films. Should he read this piece, I want to personally thank him for my awakening moment. If it were not for the first Zeitgeist film I viewed back in 2008, I would not be writing for In Mala Fide today. I watched the film with curiosity and did more than just swallow his story. I checked the facts he presented and found most of them (not all) to be true and correct.

I will state up front for those that wish to know my personal biases before reading further. I believe the atheist movement that is gaining ground in the world is a dangerous one. While not a Muslim, I believe Islam and its intellectual and spiritual traditions hold a lot of solutions to the problems of the world today and I will illustrate some of them in this article. I will not deny atheists their right to put forward their arguments against God and the problems they say religion has plagued mankind with, for many of their claims have merit. I do however reserve my right to attempt to refute their claim that atheism is therefore the answer to the problems of he 21st century. To demonstrate to atheists that, without forcing anyone to believe in God, removing the concept of a God/creator/designer from the equation of man’s social organization (which is the goal of the atheist movement) will bring about the very slave state of oppression and tyranny that the Zeitgeist movement accuses God and religion of perpetuating on man for his entire cultural history. I am loathe to use the word projection as it could easily apply to arguments for God against atheism (and this article pretty much demonstrates as much, monotheists and atheists are accusing each other of the very same thing, oppression and tyranny)…but I believe it is the atheists engaging in projection and I hope to prove I am correct based on the historical evidence of the RESULTS of believing in God vs believing there is no God.

I understand that many may find this article too simple… that it is not difficult to prove the Zeitgeist movement has a strong atheist core to its philosophy.  All I am trying to do is establish a firm line of argument and that requires showing one’s ‘work’ so to speak to prove the conclusion they derive.  So… on that note…

Premise I: Atheism is the root philosophy behind the Zeitgeist movement.

Here is the link to the full version of the original(updated) release of Zeitgeist in 2007.  I will refer to it as Z1 when I reference it for quotes. (and Z# for all subsequent new releases in the series from here on with a hyperlink embedded in the Z# time stamp.)

Complete Original ’07 Zeitgeist With 2010 Updates by: Peter Joseph (sorry, can’t embed)

http://youtu.be/guXirzknYYE

If you have not seen this film, I highly recommend taking the time to view it in its entirety before continuing with this article.

The opening is a discussion between the merits of theistic belief (i.e. the belief in a god or gods, but usually meaning one creator god) and non-theistic belief (i.e. that there is no god(s) what-so-ever). With theism [Z1 0:00:24], man is subject to laws outside himself and his control that he did not create and cannot alter. Man must obey these divine laws (i.e. be pious, virtuous and perform good works) or risk judgement and suffer serious, grievous penalties, in this life or the next, because he displeased the “divine, whatever.” [Z1 0:00:46] With non-theism, “…it is very direct, that the case history [of man] are not particularly important.  What is actually important, is here and now.”

Here then…we have the proof we need to demonstrate that the Zeitgeist movement is pure atheism at its core. Within the first two minutes, much like the first sentence/paragraph of a book which sets the tone for the author’s entire reason and purpose for writing, Peter Joseph is telling the viewer where he stands on the concept of God, and therefore what he believes regarding the moral and ethical principles that underpin his entire Zeitgeist project. These beliefs/principles are as follows:

1. There is no God.
2. All that matters is here and now.
3. Man can ignore the mistakes of his past and have no fear of the future since there are no consequences to be found in either, ‘the now’ is all there is.
4. Living in ‘the now’ requires no rules or laws, merely being ‘present.’  Man can do whatever he wants.
5. Therefore, man is the rule/law maker who need only pay attention to the ‘the now’ to achieve his happiness.  Whatever he decides to do, he may, for any consequences of his actions will be immediate and a method found to avoid, cover up, dismiss and escape them being the ‘man of action’ in ‘the now.’

Peter skillfully tries to hedge this belief later on saying ‘nature’ has laws that govern man, but he refuses to say where these rules of nature come from. I take him to mean that nature’s rules for man are entirely material in nature and therefore empirically discoverable and do not require a ‘god’ to teach man anything about himself. For Peter and other atheists, there is absolutely no room for the belief that an outside force could be responsible for setting/determining man’s laws for social organization. This becomes abundantly clear throughout the entire Zeitgeist series. Man…creates laws for himself, but based on nature for which science is somehow “all-knowing.”

While the film accurately highlights the evils of fractional reserve banking and many other areas of outright falsehood and oppression in the world today (like the co-option of Christianity by the Roman Empire for its own purposes), Peter did not attack these institutions or beliefs first and leave God and religion alone as he should have. He purposely set out to destroy God in any form, RIGHT FROM THE START (to be specific, he targets organized Christian monotheism for the most part), and therefore sees God/religion as the root cause of all of man’s problems to follow in his film. The premise being, I believe, that if man lies to himself about their being a “god,” he will swallow the lies of fractional reserve banking and the system of debt money that enslaves him. If Peter did not believe this to be vitally important to the philosophical foundation of his entire Zeitgeist project, he would not have needed to include a lengthy discussion on the ‘idiocy’ of Christian beliefs in God and Jesus (and therefore by implication, the “sanity” of atheism). He would have simply skipped the religious question as it would have been irrelevant and distracting to the real problem he is trying to address…the political and economic tyranny and oppression the world is currently engulfed in. No…instead, Peter tackles God first and attempts to prove religious institutions as the sole cause of all suffering and enslavement in man’s history before he even begins to broach the subjects of fractional reserve banking and fiat/debt currency.

We have been lied to by every institution, what makes you think for one minute that the religious institution is the only one that’s never been touched.  The religious institutions of this world are at the bottom of the dirt.  The religious institutions in this world are put there by the same people who gave you your government, your corrupt eduction, who setup your international banking cartels.  We have been misled away from the true and divine presence in the universe that men have called God.  I don’t know what God is, but I know what he isn’t and unless and until you are prepared.. to look at the whole truth… and wherever it may go… and wherever it may lead to… the more you educate yourself, the more you understand where things come from, the more obvious things become and you begin to see lies everywhere.  You have to know the truth and seek the truth and the truth will set you free.

- Intro to Zeitgeist documentary [Z1 0:09:06]

I included in the above transcript the reference made to the “divine presence in the universe that men have called God.” This is to show that while the film (and many atheists) will claim to acknowledge the potential divine nature of man’s existence, they absolutely deny any divine reality or spiritualality in practice because, as the film will make clear, for an atheist, there is no evidence for the existence of said posited divine presence. This is a clever way to get around the question of God and is most often structured around the spirituality argument, but a spirituality that is firmly grounded in material proof. Atheists treat the subject of man’s divine nature as something he choose to ‘evolve’ into via a material process of psychological evolution (which man now needs to ‘grow up’ and evolve out of)…completely ignoring the fact there is no evolutionary basis for the emergence of spirituality/God that furthers either of Darwin’s two primary goals in his theory…survival of the fittest or sexual selection. In fact, spirituality/belief in God seems to be if anything a hinderance to both!

So, without much effort, I think we can safely say that atheism is the root of the Zeitgeist movement and that they lay the blame for all the worlds problems at the “bottom of the dirt” that is religion.

So ends Part 1. With seven premises to go through, there is more to this story. I suspect not many will be interested in this topic only proving that any discussion of God has completely left the social and intellectual discourse of man in the secular/materialist West. If only the men’s movement knew how vital the emergence of a single god, with masculine properties that gave birth to patriarchy, is to the defeat of feminism and ending the corruption and tyranny the world is engulfed in. All I will say to those that will scoff at bothering to discuss, debate, and try to come to some idea about the truth of God’s existence or not…is to look to history. EVERY nation on earth that has abandoned the question of God… the moral question of man’s existence…has gone extinct, replaced with a people who honour and respect such a discussion and believe it to be important.

Thank you for your time in reading my musings.

Maximus

I have only written three pieces for the man-o-sphere. One on leadership. One on man’s fear of responsibility. One on the true state of the world in politics, economics, and 21st century western culture.  All of them have been met with some resistance, dare I say outright hostility, to the message I am trying to communicate to readers… to men… and I think I now know why.

The message I have been subtly trying to make in all my writing is this:

Man has stopped asking himself the moral question.

As the short video above articulates, so powerfully and so simply, the moral question of man and his place on earth is what has allowed him to not exterminate himself.

Throughout his entire historical past, the moral question was taken up by man’s quest for the spiritual, via religion, through belief in a power, a creator, a “god” that was beyond his reach and control and to whom man owed his existence and would one day be accountable to for his actions on this earth (by judgement as per Abrahamic faiths or by karma as per Asian traditions).  In other words, man has always feared his own extinction by forces outside of his control and for good reason… it kept him alive.

The moral question is man’s suicide hotline.

In a secular, globalized world, the moral question is not only no longer sought nor asked, it is outright rejected and denied when man needs it most. If you go back and read the three pieces I have written, the underlying tone, the subtle message, is one of morality.

I wrote “On Leaders and Leadership” because I could not stand the fact that so many “men” in the MRM know the problems society faces, but no one wants to do anything about it – i.e take a leadership role. The consensus is to just let western feminist society, the world, go down in flames. I for one think this is wrong. Doing nothing in the face of societal collapse is a MORAL choice.

I wrote “The Fear of Manning Up” to illustrate that the MGTOW philosophy of a man “going his own way” and continuing to avoid his responsibilities on earth is a MORAL cop out. To make such a choice is to say one is a child, a selfish child of infinite complaining and whining, that refuses to grow up and become an adult. As much as I sympathize with the MRM movement, I feel at times like I am surrounded by children (the recent spat of race baiting articles on In Mala Fide being just one example of such childlike behaviour).

I wrote “Charlie Sheen Vs. The Devil?” because the fear of manning up, of growing up and becoming a responsible adult, is rooted in our inability, globally, to see the evil reality the world is being engulfed by and respond to these events and crisis from not just a point of knowing the truth about what we face, but from a moral perspective – what is right, what is just, what is good.

In that Charlie Sheen piece, Jay Hammers was the only one to comment on and question/search about God. ONE person. Does “God” exist or not? What are the implications of the answer to such a question? I left in the comments a couple of videos I thought might help Jay in his spiritual search, but he was not impressed by the arguments for God made by the Islamic lecturer. That is fine. Each man must come to his own belief about God or his existence or not.

Jay’s comments however left me with a question, a question that was further sparked by that video above and the genesis for this piece.

What happens in a world… to the future of man… when he completely STOPS asking ANY moral questions in searching for a god, a creator, a power BEYOND HIMSELF?

What happens when man truly believes HE is the only power on earth he has to contend with? What happens when the psychological and evolutionary mechanism by which man has been kept from exterminating himself is removed completely from man’s psycho-social and cultural vocabulary over multiple generations? (As we have seen since the 1960s, the birth of feminism and the true seed of a pure secular/godless state.)

It is my belief that much of what the world is facing today in crisis after crisis is not corporate greed, not feminism, not Terrorism™, not screwed up relationships nor destruction of the environment.

The real crisis the world faces today that puts ALL of what is happening in the world in perspective and in relation to each another is…

A fundamental lack of anyone asking any moral questions.

I can hear many say this sounds simplistic and obvious, but is it? Many may argue the MRM is a moral response to the amorality of the feminist state… but is it? Manning up is a MORAL exhortation and it is met with the most ZEALOUS opposition in the MRM (regardless of who says it or why). To ask a moral question, give a moral opinion or conclude a moral truth is to instantly be labeled a religious zealot, a person of “judgement” over others, an individual who is completely out of step with the “modern” world by wishing to impose a MORAL WORLD VIEW of behavioural norms and modes of thinking on others.

I ask you this:

Is that not PRECISELY the result of MORAL questioning and reasoning?

The adoption of beliefs and actions that are in line with what is RIGHT and GOOD for mankind, for society?  WHAT IS MORAL?

Is this not the REAL threat Islam poses to “the West?” A MORAL JUDGEMENT of all the cultural norms, values and beliefs the west holds as sacrosanct – a globally imposed, secular, feminist, materialist, socialist/fascist/imperialist New World Order.

Am I incorrect?

I don’t think so.

What am I implying when I say men are afraid to man up?

What am I saying when I ask men to take more of a leadership role in their lives and in society in spite of the risks and dangers that are very real in doing so?

What am I suggesting when I offer an explanation as to WHY the world and our global, feminist culture is screwed up wherein the answer can be traced back to ancient rites and rituals practiced by the most evil of men?

I am suggesting to other men they need to start asking themselves moral questions.

This is PRECISELY the the threat Islam poses to the west.

And men, far more then women, seem to shun and reject such questioning. The reason?  Because MAN is the ONLY ONE that can impose a system of moral values and ethics on himself, and therefore on society as a whole, making man RESPONSIBLE for the moral fabric of society. We already know where leaving the responsibility for the imposition of moral values on society up to women leads us.

I am asking men to start questioning whether “going their own way” is the MORAL thing to do… is Game a MORAL response to the current social dynamic in dating, sex and marriage… and many men are not liking the answer I am giving them.

I am, with this article, taking the risk of coming across and sounding like a “moralizer.”

mor·al·ize [mawr-uh-lahyz, mor-]

–verb (used without object)

1. to reflect on or express opinions about something in terms of right and wrong, especially in a self-righteous or tiresome way.

–verb (used with object)

2. to explain in a moral sense,  or draw a moral from.

3. to improve the morals of.

Anyone today, especially in the west, who comes across as having a moral stance on any issue is instantly tarred and feathered, drawn and quartered, strung-up and hung. One comment to my piece “The Fear of Manning Up” makes this sentiment clear.

ZenApprentice March 7, 2011 at 4:27 pm

Maximus: “Hey men, MAN UP!!!”

Me: “No, now bugger off”.

all that needs to be said.

This is an appropriate response by a person when told by someone else that their words, actions or choices are, or could be, MORALLY WRONG OR QUESTIONABLE. This comment and attitude, of course, would be acceptable and encouraged ONLY in a society that no longer thinks the moral question should be asked of them or anyone else.

Which begs by logical reasoning the following question…

Where does abandoning the moral question to expire in our religious past leave the future of man? The above comment is the result of this man having been born and raised in a culture that, for two going on three generations now, has stopped asking ANY moral questions of himself or society. Facebook, MySpace, Twitter… has turned man into the most selfish, narcasitic and ego-obsessed creature on Earth.

Clearly… “God,” the idea of a “power” beyond man’s own unbelievably impressive and amazing self, is no longer a part of human, evolutional, psychological consciousness. The “me” decade of the 1980s has been blown out of the water by the ALL ME, NOTHING BUT BE, HEY – DO YOU KNOW ABOUT ME? of the first decade of the 21st century.

Whatever faith, or non-faith, you profess, the moral question is now the number one focus I believe the men’s movement should adopt. It does not have to take the form of any particular religion, or even a philosophy. The only action the MRM should adopt in this regard is to simply start asking moral questions.

And I don’t think I am alone.

I would like to suggest that we are in the same condition. We have many leaders, but no generals; we have no explicit organization, no headquarters, no central target to be attacked by those who would lose when we win. This empowers each of us to look and think for ourselves, rather than wait for orders; to take the initiative where we see an opening; to act together where we can, but to act on our own – perhaps choosing our own path; but also, this demands of each of us the discipline and responsibility of a leader, and to be mindful of the greater goals of Men’s Rights.

The “discipline and responsibility of a leader” is to ask moral questions of himself, of the tribe, for the GOOD of all.  To lead is to take a moral stance, to state what you believe, and seek out like minded souls in the hope of changing the moral fabric of society for the better, for its future happiness and survival.

This quote from the excellent article on leadership by Beija Flor, “Ten Thousand Generals,” articulates my point of man’s quest to answer the moral question – how should he live?  This moral question must be answered individually first, but it will not be done so in a vacuum. Man is a SOCIAL animal and MUST live, work and play with other men. Your answer to the moral question of our time will be in concert with other men as each goes out in search of the truth. This is the evolutionary process of man’s moral development that has been the history of all religions and God. And if you have studied the history of religious faiths in any way, the answer to the moral question of man always seems to point in the same direction, to one answer. What we can’t do is stop asking it as seems to be the case in the west.

If the MRM movement is looking for a place to start – a strong root from which to branch out into a true movement – it most go back to answering the moral questions of life. What is good?  What is right?  What is just?  For man as an individual?  For society as a whole? To say that we cannot look to the ONLY storehouse of answers to man’s entire history of moral questioning, the religious traditions of the world, because they are of a “moral” bent and ask man to submit to “moral laws” that govern him on this earth… is to say you desire nothing but the extinction of man himself.

Religion… faith… IS the answer to man’s moral questions. It was in the past, it will be in the future, it cannot be avoided in the present. If man does not find his moral centre again, one which he must always struggle to keep, he will commit suicide and the earth will not notice his passing for one second.

The quest for God, for a creator, for a divine power beyond our comprehension is the only thing that has kept man from killing himself. Even if after your spiritual quest you still don’t adopt any belief of any kind, and become a confirmed and proselytizing nihilist, at least your nihilism will come from a true foundational search for meaning and found none; not simply from an emotional and programmed reaction to the sad state of your life, society, culture or the world and a childish reaction to simply “stuff it” and “go your own way.” I want your godless nihilism to MEAN something, to have a true source of belief and power, because in that way, you will be a man that BELIEVES something and not just be another cog in the wheel of the mass of men leading a life of quiet (or not so quiet) desperation. I am not against nihilism or anarchy, I just want it to come from a source of true faith and belief, not some childish tantrum.

Of course, I do not believe nihilism and anarchy are the future of man… merely a transitional stage once again in his endless, evolutionary quest to continue to answer the moral question.

To this end, I myself am exploring many religious traditions, save Christianity (no need to go into why here, my views are my own). Islam and Buddhism, for myself, seem to answer a lot of the moral questions we no longer wish to ask of ourselves in the west. There are a great many answers in both of these faiths, as well as other faith traditions including Christianity, that can help guide man BACK to a way of life that is centered around answering the basic moral questions of life – how to live rightly on earth in peace, tolerance, love and respect. Again, for myself, Islam and Buddhism seem to blend both the masculine and the feminine elements of man’s nature to the nth degree – a perfect balance and a mix I think is evolutionary, not revolutionary, and therefore possible as a synthesis of belief and faith for man in the 21st century moving forward into the future.

Man’s spiritual quest brings out his divine elements, his rising above his base nature. Without it, I fear man will find a way to exterminate himself and it seems he has now acquired the knowledge and the means to do so. The Fukishima meltdown is the Titanic distress call to the future of man’s survival if he continues to ignore the moral question.

The Richard Dawkins crowd will surely flame me in the comments to follow, but that again will only go to prove that I am winning – for the louder they protest and the more fiercely they attack religious traditions, the more one can see there arguments ultimately ring hollow and they themselves do not believe what they scream about. (Which is only logical, since they believe in NOTHING!)

The loudest argument of the religion of atheism (the claim of NO god is as dogmatic and religious a belief as the claim FOR god) is thus:

Man does not require “god” or “religion” to ask fundamental moral questions and answer them.

Here is my refutation.

Evolution.

Dawkins, not Darwin, may be trying to take God out of the question of creation, and therefore make man a god via his complete freedom to self-determination by any other power than his own imagination, but he failed to explain away the universal trait in man to go on a spiritual quest, to SEARCH for God, a creator, a power beyond himself. This is evident in ANY AND ALL cultures one looks at. Man’s quest for the eternal divine source of his being is universal, therefore it is a part of man’s evolutionary history, and you simply cannot wish it away because you happen to believe genes and the environment program man and all of life. And even if you do believe it is all genes and memes, it seems this damn question of God and man’s spirit just cannot die no matter how much “proof” secular, scientific and materialist man finds to convince himself he should not believe such “nonsense.”

What is the purpose for this quest? Why does man go looking for God? Why is Jay Hammers, a 21 century male for certain, asking “bat-shit insane” Maximus’ questions about God? Why is that “question” still there after so many years of secular Darwinism banishing God to the “primitive” history of man’s knowledge of himself?

Some may argue that the spiritual quest was simply man’s primitive and unenlightened way of answering moral questions, of discovering some of the “natural laws” that gave structure to the first complex primitive societies that eventually became cultures and finally nation states ruled by “laws.” God was not necessary, he just happened to be the vehicle by which man evolved a higher and higher consciousness of the greater good for all.

Which is precisely my point.

Nowhere on earth does man NOT have this quest to answer moral questions – the questions of ultimate importance to his survival – how he should live on Earth. What are the rules and laws that should govern man in relation to himself, other men and the earth? Survival I say because all of man’s religions (and all his philosophies trying to answer whether God exists or not) are about discovering a “god” or a “source” of power/creation (or reason), by which man could discover the laws that govern himself rightly and therefore ensure the survival of MAN! If Moses had not come along and unequivocally and universally declared “thou shall not kill,” some other dude would have because it is a LAW that needs to adopted, imposed and respected by ALL MEN if man is to prevent his own extinction!

Therefore, if the search for God, the quest for answers to the moral questions of man’s survival is universal, the removal of said questioning can only mean one thing – his extinction.

When man puffs his ego and pride so full that he believes himself to be OUTSIDE the laws of nature, the universe, of God, there can only be one destination for him – the dustbin of history, a fossil, just like the dinosaurs.

This is not merely a religious argument, it is also a philosophical one, as any philosopher who dares tread into “moral” territory will also be attacked for such an egregious breach of others “rights” and be accused of the “hate crime” of trying to judge others from a position of moral authority – what is right, just and good FOR ALL. This MORAL philosophy, begun in Greece with Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, was summarized and adopted as “faith” by the west (or at least it used to be) by John Stuart Mill’s classic essay – On Liberty.

Whether the readers in the MRM or MGTOW communities wish it or not, they are going to have to come to terms with the moral question.

Man will have to re-assert MORAL AUTHORITY in the world.

He will have to man up.

The future of any mass men’s movement MUST have a moral question, a moral code and law, at its heart. Men MUST become moralizers, despite the inherent risk common sense dictates to those that take such a position. But in this case, common sense might not be so common if asking moral questions about society and man is now wholly and completely taboo.

Which only goes again to prove my point – that questions of morality are extinct in the modern world, even here, in the so called radical male rebellion against it.

When did it become a matter of social “pressure” to NOT be moral? To NOT ask questions of moral significance? This was the underlying thesis of Mill’s essay On Liberty. Where does the freedom of the individual end, and his responsibility to the well being of society begin? How much liberty should a man be given before society says “that’s too much” and exerts social pressure and “laws” for the well being and future of society itself? These are all MORAL questions that were at the HEART of the Declaration of Independence and the debates about democracy vs republic vs monarchy of the times. And ALL of those debates spun around the moral centre of Christian faith and duty to GOD AND FAMILY. Where have those questions gone? Far more than feminism being the one to blame for the downfall in morals, values and ethics, man’s ABANDONING of asking the moral question is EQUALLY to blame for the situation humanity finds itself in.

The very idea of asking a moral question… to be seen as taking a moral stance… is now  the socially accepted norm of being in the WRONG and will only “bite you in the ass.” Sure, taking a moral stance can bite you in the ass if you don’t practice what you preach, but to stop asking moral questions ENTIRELY do to such a fear, is to say a society no longer CARES or even HAS any morals to defend and therefore question if such-and-such or this-or-that is right or wrong?

What is the good life?

What is a happy life?

What is a just society?

What is a loving relationship between a man and woman?

These are all moral questions.

Questions that, no matter where I go or what company I find myself in (or you should you try asking them yourself after reading this article), are simply too taboo to ask in polite conversation and will get one shunned and ridiculed for even SUGGESTING there are not just answers to these questions, but RIGHT answers, to such questions. Answers that bear a personal RESPONSIBILITY for ones choices and actions in conducting your life.

21st century man is a man with no moral compass.

A man with no moral compass will kill himself and take the whole of humanity with him.

This is my argument for asking questions about God, whether one believes he exists or not.

I hope this article will spark other authors here at In Mala Fide to take on the topic of the moral question… which is really short hand for saying God and religion in many ways. So too philosophy to some degree but by nature, philosophy will never take a moral position because to take one is to make a claim to truth and no philosopher I have met will ever do such thing without grave reservation.

This is why Jay Hammers’ comments about God give me some hope.

In reviewing the comments to all three of my written pieces, they are, by in large, overwhelmingly positive. Where they were not, the criticisms were outright hostile and dismissive entirely and I now, in this piece, think I have figured out the root reason why. (In case the reader has not noticed, the only question I seem to ask about anything is WHY?) This goes to show me that questions of morality, of right and wrong conduct in society and between men and women, is once again coming to the foreground. Man, it seems, does want to stick around on this earth just a little while longer.

Many in the MRM may not like where my logical argument for a return to the moral question of man concludes. That man must once again come to know God and adapt himself to modes of thought and belief that constrict his actions and behaviour toward others in accordance with “natural” or “divine” laws. If evolution has taught us anything, it is that man cannot escape its laws. One of those laws just happens to be a moral one – grow up or die. The moral question of man must once again be answered for a new epochal generation of men. It is my belief that this answer will be a combination of Islam, Buddhism and the earth centered spiritual traditions of the aboriginal peoples. As the aboriginal elder spoke so poignantly to the rows of MEN in his audience (because women can never answer this question AND impose the answer on society):

If you don’t have a moral question in your governing process, you don’t have a process that’s going to survive.

And with that… I leave you with what appears to be the ultimate moral question of our upside down society.

Note… watch 0:50 for the submissive HAPPINESS of a woman being TOLD her place by an honorable and respectable holy man speaking about the MORALITY of female modesty. She smiles and bows her head and her shoulders go up all shy like she has been caught doing something naughty.

PS… I find it HILARIOUS that the woman asking the question is wearing a shirt emblazoned with the word NAIVE!

Yup… the games are over, girls. It is time to grow up and become ladies. It is also time we boys grew up and became men.

Maximus

NOTE: Because I realize that this article by Maximus will kick up a gigantic shitstorm, I want to explain my rationale for publishing it. I disagree vehemently with much of what he says here, and anyone who is familiar with my opinions on this subject can vouch for me. However, two weeks ago, I declared that the new In Mala Fide would be a meeting ground for a multitude of anti-establishment groups, virtually all of which I agree and disagree with in varying degrees. This excerpt from the About page sums up my mentality:

We don’t always agree on issues. In fact, we disagree frequently, counting among our numbers men’s rights activists, hedonists, Christian patriarchs, white nationalists and other marginalized groups. But all of us are dedicated to exposing the uncomfortable realities of the world around us with insight and wit. Sit down, strap in and get ready for one hell of a ride.

In fact, the next IMF article that will appear after this one is a complete polar opposite to everything stated here. While I disagree with Maximus, his arguments are powerfully worded, eloquently stated, and controversial – everything I want this site to be. Hence, why I decided to run his post.

With my ass adequately covered, take it away Maximus! – Ferdinand

Maximus’ Note: Disagreement is the very heart of the search for truth.  The second everyone in the room agrees is the second truth dies.  While I do believe to be true all I have written below, I am in no way dogmatic in my assertions or closed minded to being refuted – I am merely confident.  One thing I find lacking in the world today is anyone willing to take a stand about what they believe about anything.  This piece, if Ferdinand’s note is any guide, looks like it will not just push some people’s buttons, but literally have them crapping vehemently in disagreement with both me for writing it and FB for publishing it.  This is precisely why I wrote it – a) because of the content you are about to read and b) the fact that quote-un-quote “educated” people will be aghast someone is “asserting” this bat-shit insane, “lunacy” conspiracy theory is true.  Remember, if you don’t believe in anything, you will fall for everything. I am looking forward to the polar opposite rebuttal article which is forthcoming that Ferdinand eluded to.  Welcome… to true open and free debate. Breathe the fresh air of clashing ideas and opinions and know the search for truth is marching back to the forefront of societies consciousness after far too long an absence.  What I hope to glean  from the entrails of the comments to this piece is… are people ignoring, laughing at or fighting what I have to say.  My hope is they fight me… because that means truth is about to win.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not traitor, he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.” - Cicero, 42 B.C.

 

“The clues all seem to point to the idea that lying, holding onto a lie, even if one is only lying to the self, and believing lies, causes some kind of damage to this area of the brain.”- from Gift Of The Magi To The Elect

The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing people he did not exist.

In case you missed my first article for In Mala Fide, I have a knack for pushing people’s buttons.  I want to push more buttons.

Let’s push the biggest rhetorical button I can find… wait, where is it… oooh… THERE it is, and with a big DO NOT PUSH BUTTON sign too, how convenient.

Game is bullshit.

MRM is bullshit.

MGTOW is bullshit.

Insert-your-pet-peeve-here… is bullshit.

Whatever “complaint” you have about life, politics, religion et all… when you see the larger picture and context within which the world is living right now… ALL of your petty, trivial, nit-picking concerns are fucking bullshit.

It is all bullshit and we are nothing but a bunch of tools surfing the unreality of the Internet venting steam out of our asses on blogs or tweets over various pet, vanity issues we “care” about while letting REAL problems go completely ignored and unchallenged in this world. And I mean some seriously evil shit. We are a bunch of branch hackers trying to take out the tree of evil… but no one has the balls to climb down from their high and mighty perch to take an axe to the root.

Ok… how many readers are still with me…  show of hands please…

One… two… three… a few. Good. A revolution with a bunch of angry stick-in-the-mud’s who can’t laugh at themselves ain’t no fun and ain’t worth doing anyhoo and that should have got rid of the lot of them.

To continue… I honestly don’t know why we “men” in the man-o-sphere (and I include myself in that derogatory smear in quotes) are whining and complaining about how bad Western feminist society has become and debating whether or not we should “man up” and fix it or just let the whole damn thing go down in flames. In a past masculine age, it would not even be a conversation. Men would simply take command and use their God given position of authority in the natural world to be rid of the trifling matter. That is why I want the MRM to succeed. It is the beginning of a social shift back to that past masculine age of GOOD men taking authority over women and society and thus has the potential to cure the biggest cancer 21st century society faces today, feminism. But the threat of the Men’s Rights Movement, the possibility of good men en mass reclaiming their authority, to the powers that be is a lot bigger than simply the destruction of feminism.  The real threat of the MRM is a mass awakening of sleep walking young men to the real problems they face now and in the future... and those young men deciding to NOT go-their-own-way and watch the world burn, but instead, take action to kick some ass and fix this “trifling matter” of a debauched and corrupt western society.

Naively optimistic?

Perhaps, but someone has to be.

I am only a hair’s breadth on the side of hope, toes gripping the feminist / globalist gang-plank and fighting for balance in a feat of sheer masculine will as EVERYONE tries to push me off and into the sea of nihilism and zero hope/optimism for the future of society, which Ferdinand, Roissy and other rabble rousing online groups like 4Chan and Anonymous all very realistically cannot see society every coming back from the abyss.  I totally identify with them… because I have seen the true beast we face at the bottom of that abyss with my eyes wide open and it is scarier than even the worst nightmares you have already had about the future. But, like Maximus says at the end of the movie Gladiator before he goes on to defeat the psychopath, man-child, would-be-emperor of the then known world…

~ I knew a man once who said, “Death smiles at us all. All a man can do is smile back.”~

That is why I am so loving Charlie Sheen right now.

Watch that NBC Today interview. (And you can brush up on your German while you’re at it. :-) Watch Sheen ask for $3 million an episode… a $1 million raise… to finish the rest of his contract for Two and a Half Men. Gentleman, THAT is a masculine man. “Fuck with me?  Try to use fear and intimidation on me?  Threaten my family and future financial well being? Fuck you! You are going to pay, dumbass. Bring it.”

That man is staring death and the Devil straight in the face and not just smiling, but laughing his ass off while bringing both of them down (and CBS et al) a few pegs from their high and mighty, holier-than-thou, “I will get you in the end” attitude while he is at it.

Charlie Sheen is the #1 reason ALL men should give a fuck about the future of society.

Charlie Sheen is in the fight of his life. He is literally fighting the Devil… the Big Shaitān, Iblis himself. And by “the devil,” I don’t mean Charlie’s past alcohol and drug recreational hobbies. Neither do I mean his pending legal spat with an army of zombie corporate lawyers over the breach-of-contract cancellation by CBS of the still hugely successful TV series Two and a Half Men. I literally mean the Devil… pure evil itself.

Why is the Devil after Charlie?

Because of this - Charlie Sheen challenges the official story of 9/11 in Twenty Minutes with the President.

That’s right… the Devil himself is on a mission to take out Charlie Sheen because Charlie is fucking up the Illuminati, NWO, master plan for global slavery and hell on earth by using his star power to wake up the zombie masses of America (and the world) to the REAL enemy they face – their own globalist, co-opted Satanic government.

Allow me to pre-empt some of the predictable critical comments to this article right now.  To wit…

“The Devil? New world order?  A satanic one world government?  Illuminati?  What the F$*@!# is this nutbar Maximus talking about?  The only danger to Charlie Sheen is Charlie Sheen himself!  Islamic terrorism is real.  Osama Bin Laden attacked America on 9/11.  America and its allies are in a war to save the world from global Islamic terrorism.  These Muslim extremists hate America and all we stand for.  Muslims are the ones that worship Satan!”

Tsk tsk tsk.  How truly asleep so many still are.  With their heads buried so deep in the sand, I am surprised some people have enough oxygen to put together coherent sentences.

Just look how deep this guy’s head is buried.

Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech March 8, 2011 at 1:23 am

 

[Which is precisely what the NWO elite want you to become – divide and conquer between the sexes allows the oligarch state to rule estranged and depressed men and women like slaves with impunity.]

So we’re supposed to base life decisions on fictitious bogeymen now? Even if the NWO did exist I fail to see why they would want men ghosting. The last thing they would want is men doing the least amount of work possible needed to sustain themselves. If anything the NWO would want men to be married with kids to keep men working and working and working.

Fictitious bogeyman?  If… IF… the NWO exists?

Seriously?  This is the coma within which you are still living your life?

Those two words… fictitious bogeyman… were the seed for this entire article. I am sick and tired of truth being condemned as lies and conspiracy – and lies and conspiracy being praised as truth.

Pro-Male… just chill before you let the flames fly in the comments. Since I know you are a genuinely masculine man, you can tell when another dude is giving you a hard time because he is trying to help you and laugh with you as we both have fun trying to figure out this crazy ride called life. If you still wish to get angry with me for using you to illustrate a point, that is your choice, but I hope you will keep an open mind and finish reading this whole piece before casting judgement on me or it.

In fact… Pro-Male… I wish to thank you.

Thank you… out of ALL the comments on my first article… YOU were the ONLY ONE to read, identify and make specific reference to the single most important issue not just men, but the whole world faces today… the return of slavery and global, corporate, technocratic, oligarchic rule, or what I am calling NEO-FEUDALISM.

This is the fight Charlie Sheen himself even recognizes in the interview – “they” are going after his money, and therefore, trying to destroy his family by leaving him unable to provide for them. Calling all divorced men… sound familiar? The elite don’t want ANYONE to have money, especially those they feel they have “blessed” with wealth and fame who then go on to ATTACK the very foundations of the global elite power structure… the continued dumbing down and hypnotizing of the masses to the slavery of their lives by the entertainment industry. You will also note Charlie Sheen has gone “warlock” for the VERY REASONS I said good, masculine men would fight for the future of society in my first article The Fear of Manning Up… his family… a man’s own. (One can debate what kind of “family” Charlie has, but what business is it of ours?  It is HIS family and he will FIGHT to protect it.)

The reason most people think Charlie Sheen is “crazy” and “on drugs again” is because he is the ONLY SANE PERSON speaking the truth today about first, his own life… and second, the real problem of corruption and lies America is facing. As an analogy, when those in the MRM try to educate men who are still asleep to the evils wrought by feminism on society, the reaction we get from those zombies still plugged into the feminist matrix is… drum roll please… that we are crazy and on drugs. When you have a sober and sane man of high intelligence and logical reasoning fly off in a brilliant oratory stream of creative sarcasm and contempt for the idiocy of the society that surrounds him… the so-called “normal” people of said screwed up society think he has gone nuts or is back on drugs. America, and so too much of the world, has been stewing and fermenting in a culture of lies, narcissism, hypocrisy and deceit for so long, that when a sane person speaks the truth, the truth sounds insane.

Watch that NBC Today interview again. Watch the clarity and focus Charlie has in asking questions to Chuck Lorre about why he and CBS cancelled 2 1/2 Men. Watch him put the screws to Chuck on not caring at all about the 100+ staff of the show who are now out of work. Watch also as Charlie goes straight to the specific page in the AA handbook talking about acceptance… of Charlie and his lifestyle which is NONE of Lorre’s high-and-mighty moral condemning concern… pausing in ALL the right spots to EMPHASIZE the pointed TRUTH of his logical argument… so Chuck “gets the message,” and then tosses the AA book at the camera while looking straight into it… straight at Chuck. (Although it is ironic that without that lifestyle, Chuck would have no material for his “writing” to draw from, so really, what does Chuck contribute to the show other than chronicling Charlie Sheen’s real life of sheer, epic awesomeness?)

Does that sound like a man on drugs?

Does that sound like a man who is psychologically unhinged?

The answer is… no…. of course not.

That is the words and actions of a man living the truth of his life in a world where most others live nothing but a lie.

So why does America still think Charlie is on drugs or mentally unstable?

Watch Charlie challenge the interviewer when asked if he will relapse having not gone the traditional route of AA to rid himself of his “addiction” to drugs and alcohol. Charlie goes on the OFFENSIVE. His response to the interviewer’s suggestion that even strong willed people relapse was to point out where the TRUE fault lies… IN THEIR LACK OF WILL POWER… the weakness of their minds… to cure themselves. AA is total bullshit. The only reason a truly “cured” addict does not go back? Sheer will power. These cured individuals use the power of their minds to NEVER drink alcohol or take drugs again. They make a conscious CHOICE to stay clean and sober that belies the lie that an “addiction” is something beyond a person’s normal functioning mind to control. THAT is why America thinks Charlie is on drugs. He is exposing American pop-culture psychology and its penchant for self-help gurus, guides and extensive, expensive, life-long and costly drug-and-couch therapy et all for what it is… bullshit for “fools… fools… trolls… weak… defeated… they allowed defeat to BE AN OPTION.”

That interview with Charlie Sheen is pure masculinity on display… in the unfiltered raw… and America is reacting badly to it because the whole of America has become one big vagina of victimhood and learned helplessness when it comes to being honest about how they live their lives and what they do to cure themselves of personal “problems and difficulties.”

“But, but, but, but, but…”  I can hear you say… “America is not…

All I hear is…

Dear Sand Sheeple,

What you are about to read is not bullshit.

It is blunt, unvarnished truth.  The kind of truth that has put Charlie Sheen in the cross hairs for elimination (which is a deadly claim I will prove further on).

I want to know in comments to this piece just how many people are awake, or asleep, to what is of ACTUAL IMPORTANCE in the world today that they should be giving a damn about.  I want this to be the single most commented blog article on the Internet.  I want this piece to go viral if at all possible.

But first, some background to establish myself.

I was once as asleep as Pro-Male until the fall/winter of 2007/08.  At that time, because I thought a university degree might help my future employment and financial prospects (I told you I was asleep), I decided to enroll in university for the first time in my life. I took a smattering of arts courses (politics, philosophy, etc, all that life enriching stuff that no longer pays in our fucked up society) because that is what I was interested in. What I found after my first year in one of the most feminist infected campuses on the planet was students and staff even more asleep than I was. (And I was pretty much a zombie when I enrolled.)

Then half way through the first term, someone told me about the film Zeitgeist.

After watching it, I discovered and watched my first Alex Jones documentary, titled End Game.

Because the university I went to is old and predictably underfunded, the professors were always complaining about the out-of-date books the students had to use for research papers. And when I say out of date, I mean the bulk of the library having books as old as 1900 to 1950 to cite as “reference” for papers in the 21st century, and many books older than 1900. The beautiful thing is, that meant NONE of those old “useless” books had any feminist/liberal/PC re-visioning that is so prevalent now in current text books and is KILLING the quest for truth in higher education, for those that even bother to try anymore.

When I watched the two above documentaries … I reacted as I think most people who have not seen these films yet would…

What a bunch of bullshit.

But I kept an open mind and said to myself…

“Hey, there are a lot of names, dates, events and facts in these documentaries that someone thought was important for others to know about and took the time to prove are also true as best they could.  Maybe I should not so casually dismiss their claims out of hand.  I wonder if I can find some of these facts in books in the library.  Enough of them to either prove what is in those documentaries as true or false FOR MYSELF and not simply take it as so on their authority alone.”

I went searching for the truth… a personal quest… and that is when I woke up.

I hope to inspire you with this article to go on your own personal quest for the truth.

I went into that library of glorious old books, 99% of them written by men, and found a universe of facts of true academic quality. If put together in a tightly written, logically reasoned research thesis paper, these facts would be hard for any professor to refute. I connected a map of historical dots about the state of the world so dense a child could draw the picture that presented itself.

That picture was not pretty.

The International – an incredible Clive Owen movie about the banking and military industrial/espionage complex is NOT Hollywood. The bank in the movie… the IBBC… was a real bank. The bank’s real name was BCCI and it’s illegal operations were exposed in a brilliant book of investigative journalism titled The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride Into the Secret Heart of BCCI that was clearly the inspiration for the film.

Fictitious bogeymen indeed… it is to laugh. That is just ONE book publicly available among hundreds that prove the whole War on Terror, etc is nothing but a concocted fraud…. IF someone bothers to go looking for the truth that is.

I am not going to waste your time or mine going over the “debate” of 9/11 TRUTH and the coming final push for a central bank led, “new world order”, One World Government under a communist/socialist, police-state model. Do your own research and start with the End Game documentary by Alex Jones. If you are not “awake” after watching that, you never will be and I am not going to waste my time trying to convince you this whole “War on Terror” is a god damn myth trumped up by the most evil of non-humans for NO REASON other than POWER and CONTROL. I think if Pro-Male and others have a problem accepting these new truths I am about to present about the world they live in, they, like I once was, simply cannot overcome the cognitive dissonance of comprehending that human beings are capable of such GROSS EVIL against their fellow man. You can’t process it. It takes time to come to terms with a new reality and understand its place in your new world view that priori, one must humbly admit, was of total and complete ignorance to the truth. To accept these truths is to accept you are WRONG about many fundamental aspects of the world you live in you once believed to be absolute… and that… is VERY hard for many people to do.

So… what I am going to prove is that the Devil exists…. that Charlie Sheen is in a death match with him… and ALL that I have written above and coming below are tied intimately together… ALL the dots connect.

Yes… “the book” no one wants to read in America anymore because we are so secular and modern has allowed the Devil to pull off his greatest trick… the world no longer thinks he exists. (And that is primarily because the world no longer thinks God exists.)

Now, when I say “the Devil”, Shaitān, I don’t mean LITERALLY a dude with horns and a tail encouraging you in the direction of sin while sitting on your shoulder. That vision is as false as saying God / Allah is a dude with a beard in the sky that is going to judge and condemn you to hell from some puffy, cloud-like throne, despite how much he says he loves you.

What I am talking about is literally good vs evil.

The “Devil” has, under various names throughout man’s religious history, been the embodiment of man’s darker, evil side – his total and complete destructive, enslaving, murdering and psychopathic self-annihilation side.

This is the point at which I wish to warn people about what is to follow.

Like Morpheus in the Matrix, I am giving you the chance to take the blue pill now.  To click the back button and write off this piece as being too long for your short attention span, twitter world to bother reading anymore, forget all that you have read so far, and go back to your mundane, zombie life convinced of the nut-bar status you have judged this author to be.

I am serious.. if you are asleep like I once was, like Pro-Male still appears to be, what you are about to read is going to turn your brains inside out and have you seriously questioning your sanity and just what the fuck is going on in the world once you are able to see it as it truly is.

Still here?

Good. Be sure to chase that red pill down with a straight vodka or tequila chaser. You are going to need it.

First… without getting into a religious debate about the existence of either God or the Devil as they are commonly understood in the Abrahamic faiths, let us simply assume for now that we all agree there is good and there is evil in the world. Ok? Good.

Second… when it comes to religious texts like the Torah, Bible or the Quran, whether a devout Jew/Christian/Muslim or rabid atheist (you guys really need to calm down), for this article, let us put aside our differences in interpretation of fact or detail and accept as common… that there were gods, peoples and events in history that give context to the these religious texts and can be taken as true for the time period of the cultures and societies within which these sacred texts were “revealed” to man as proven by archeological and anthropological evidence to date. Ok? Excellent.

Now… let’s also assume for arguments sake, and this is a strong assumption, that there are some seriously fucked-up evil people in this world who believe in the Devil… that he actually exists… and they WORSHIP him and all his destructive, death dealing and most importantly… his POWER bequeathing forces.

Now… imagine these same insane people are some of (not all) the most highly placed Washington and global politicians, corporate CEOs, entertainment moguls in music and film and just about anybody else with a hard-on for power and control over others in the “elite of the elite” of those that think they are the ones running this planet.

Now also imagine that most of these clinical psychopaths, for that is what they are as I will soon prove, are male and many are homosexual, most of them closeted. (Although, when you see the “sexuality” these men profess to engage in, I don’t even now if I would call it that as it is an insult to true gay men of a loving nature and I have no word for what these people do to get their rocks off.)

Sound fucked up yet? Sound like a bunch of bullshit?

It just so happens to be true, and the truth as you will read is actually even worse than that already sounds.

Let’s begin our journey down the rabbit hole with Alex Jones.

Alex Jones, one of the few true friends Charlie Sheen has in this world right now and who went on The View recently to defend him and attempt to wake up more sleeping, head-buried sand sheeple…

…has been a pain in the psychopathic elite’s ass for a long time now. He even snuck into one of the holiest and most secretive of meetings held by the global power elite in America, the Bohemian Grove Society. Check out his investigation into the “recreational fun” that your world politicians and media / corporate “elite” have on their days off, compare them to Charlie Sheen, and then decide who is “fucked-up insane and on drugs.”

Alex Jones – Dark Secrets Inside the Bohemian Grove

(It is important to note…that all of the documentaries I am linking to in this piece should be watched at some point for the whole of this article to make sense. If I went into all the detail necessary to prove my thesis that the Devil is at work in the world, this piece would go on forever. You will have to do some of the investigative work for yourself.)

If you turn to your Bible’s Old Testament or the Jewish Torah, you will find multiple references to a Babylonian God by the name of Moloch. Not a particularly nice god and this one happens to be rather demanding, as gods tended to be back then.

“And he defiled the Tophet, which is in the valley of Ben-hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter pass through the fire l’Molech.” – 2 Kings 23:10 (from Wikipedia)

And He defiled To’pheth, which is in the valley of the sons of Hinnom, that no one might burn his son or his daughter as an offering to Molech.” – 2 Kings 23:10 (revised standard version, my copy of the Bible)

As we can see, precise translation of ancient languages over time can be somewhat problematic. What is clearly evident though no matter how the ancient Greek Septuagint is translated into English – this “Moloch” god demanded sacrifice and it specifically demanded the sacrifice of children. Keep that fact in mind as you read.

The Bohemian Grove is just such a gathering and sacrifice. Yes, you read that correctly and if you watch the entire Alex Jones documentary on the Bohemian Grove, it will scare the shit out of you. The gathering of today’s political and corporate elite – as in ancient Babylon, as today at the Bohemian Grove – is all about power and control over the masses so the “elite” don’t have to lift a damn finger to do any work for themselves. Then as now, there was a ritual sacrifice that had to be made to petition the elite’s chosen “god” for favour… for POWER AND CONTROL to be bestowed upon them…so they could continue to do their evil work of oppression and slavery of the deluded masses. What this ritual was called then, we do not know. What we do know is that today, this yearly and very ancient ritual is still carried out in its current form at the Bohemian Grove and is called the “Ceremony of Care.” In short, it is literally the burning of a child in effigy in front of a large Owl statue that appears to be a representation of the old Babylonian god Moloch, or what they call “wisdom and knowledge.” What is this so-called “wisdom and knowledge” that grants them power over the masses? The abandonment, the KILLING in ritual sacrifice, of “dull care” in the world.

Literally… it is the sacrifice of human caring, empathy and compassion as universally symbolized by a child or infant.

And people think Ferdinand is blowing smoke up their ass whenever he tries to warn people the moneyed class on Wall St. and in Washington are literally trying to KILL YOU to enrich themselves. This is all part of the sacrifices necessary in a death cult for their continued power and control on earth…it is all a stupid, dumb-ass, bizarre ritual…you mean NOTHING to them and they will kill you without a thought or a tear because they can.

The “religion” of your political, economic and cultural elite, no matter what faith tradition they profess publicly for the masses to consume, is one of abject rejection of ALL that is good and noble in man in ALL those Abrahamic faith traditions – his capacity for love, empathy, and compassion for his fellow human beings.

Still believe these NWO, CFR, Trilateral Commission bogeyman are fictitious?

Don’t take my word for it, listen to the interview with Aaron Russo on his “friendship,” with Nick Rockefeller. A “friendship” that was nothing more than a recruitment drive on the part of the elite to bring another rising Hollywood director/producer – who was about to go into politics – into the Bohemian Grove cult of “dull care.”

Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo

The elite did not take notice of Aaron until he made his documentary film Mad As Hell, which was an expose that…

“…criticized NAFTA, The War on Drugs, the concept of a National ID Card, Asset Forfeitures and Government Regulation of Alternative Medicine” - From the info on the film Mad As Hell on YouTube

Aaron was running for Governor of Nevada to change things. He was not about to sit on his ass and “go his own way” when he learned how screwed up the political and economic system his beloved country America had degenerated into. And that is precisely when the elite contacted him and tried to co-opt him – when Aaron tried to GET INTO the system to FIX IT and had enough Hollywood celebrity status that he just might do the elite harm. In doing so, Nick Rockefeller started to brag about the elite’s plans for the world…as all psychopathic, megalomaniacs do…and at one point revealed to Aaron the events of 9/11 several months before they occurred. (Never mind Nick’s revelation of the TRUE reason the Rockefellers funded feminism – #1: to tax the other 1/2 of humanity that was not currently working and #2: co-opt the education of the young to trust the state, not the family, to take care of them.)  In the interview, Aaron summed up Nick’s values and beliefs about life and the unwashed masses thusly…

What do you care for? Why do you care about them? Why do you care about those people? What difference do they make to you? What do the rest of those people mean to you? They don’t mean anything to you. Take care of your life, take care of your family. Don’t worry about them. They don’t mean anything to you, they are just serfs.

“Them.”  “They.”  “Those people.“ “Serfs.”

You.

Sound familiar? Is that not EXACTLY how Chuck Lorre described the 100+ staff of Two and a Half Men after he and CBS cancelled it as quoted by Charlie Sheen – “They are not my problem.”

THIS is why I am hoping I can convert MRM and MGTOW advocates to give a fucking damn about the future of society. If you don’t give a shit about your life and the future of society, someone else will and it will NOT be to your benefit or betterment. Men going their own way and letting the world burn is EXACTLY what the NWO elite want. They WANT men dropping out of society. They WANT men going their own way and not giving a shit about what happens because, the more men that drop out of society (as Pro-Male and a large bulk of the MRM advocate), the less men there are to “man up” and CHALLENGE these uncaring psychopaths and STOP their plans for global enslavement of the human population.

That is why Charlie Sheen is a threat to the establishment…to the Devil, to the these Babylonian, Moloch worshiping, Satanic nut-bars that we keep electing to office, paying our mortgage to and dumping our money on for music and entertainment “distractions” to the mind numbing slavery of our everyday work lives. Charlie is not bowing to their power and control because he is a FREE MAN who gives a damn about his family and the people he works with. Like Aaron, Charlie Sheen is not “one of them,” these Satan-worshipping occultists that believe Man is an animal and that nature’s laws, not God’s, are the only ones by which man is and should be governed by. (and by God, I mean Man’s natural higher order traits like love and caring that take him away from animality.)

The cancellation of Two and a Half Men had NOTHING to do with Charlie’s off-hour drug and alcohol fueled “epic” parties. It had EVERYTHING to do with shutting down the perch of wealth, fame and stardom that allowed him to speak to the masses of America and wake them up to the real dangers they face from an uncaring elite that is attempting to make them all slaves again on their RFID “everyone’s-gonna-get-chipped” globalist plantation. The drug and alcohol fueled life Charlie led was merely the convenient vehicle by which they could attempt to dismiss him from the show (and the spotlight of fame he could speak out from) that would be plausible and acceptable in the public eye.

But it did not work. The public is not buying it and the more Charlie Sheen speaks out, the more people start to pay attention and the more people he is winning to his side of the argument with CBS, and worse, on 9/11. For all the elite’s vaunted intelligence and assumption of the stupidity of the masses, the mass of humanity knows a snow-job and an honest, good man like Charlie Sheen when they see one.

Charlie’s “exit” from wealth and fame was planned.

You can see the plan Chuck Lorre and CBS concocted to give Charlie the boot in their own actions. Again, go back to the questions Charlie asks on that NBC Today interview to Chuck about the show.

Question # 1

“Why is it when I was ready to return to work, you told me, ‘There are NO SCRIPTS ready to shoot?’”

2nd part to the first -

“What would we have shot if you had NOT ordered the SUITS into my home to shut down my party?”

So…CBS tells Charlie to go and get cleaned up in order to come back to work…but when he DID come back to work 100% CLEAN and in RECORD TIME… it appears Lorre had NO SCRIPTS to shoot.  What was Chuck doing while Charlie used his brain to fix himself which no one in America can or wants to believe?

Hmmm…

Question #2

“Why is it you issued a decree, informing me, that the remaining eight shows, of Season 8, had been reduced to four?”

“Season 8… was suddenly to HALT PRODUCTION two weeks earlier than scheduled.”

Are you beginning to see the picture here? Do you need more dots? Charlie didn’t. That is why he went on a warlock tirade about Chuck and CBS and will not apologize for it. Why should he? He realized he had been hung-out to dry by low-life, cowardly fucks who don’t give a shit about anyone other than themselves and money. I would be angry too and most likely react the same way. The only difference between Charlie and regular people without tiger blood is that Charlie actually VENTED his frustration on air to a friend WITHOUT A FILTER.

There was no going back to 2 1/2 Men for Charlie…because the elite did not want him back in the fame spotlight.  The elite want Charlie OUT, and publicly out, to begin the cycle of media smearing of his character and the removal of his sole source of income so he can no longer speak out about issues like the truth about 9/11. He just gave them the ammunition they needed for a plan they already had in motion to run his acting career and personal reputation into the ground. You also can’t kill someone off UNTIL their reputation is ruined in the eyes of the masses so they no longer take him seriously and therefore write off any truth he may have revealed about the elite as the ramblings of a “drug addicted alcoholic on the verge of psychosis.” Is that not the VERY CONSENSUS the media is trying their best to smear Sheen as being? Can you see the dots being laid out before your eyes? Charlie, with his firing from CBS…is in real danger of being killed by the elite if he does not shut up about 9/11 Truth.

Charlie…has been given a warning shot across the bow – “STOP fucking with the elite system of control over the masses, or ‘we’ will take from you all the wealth and fame ‘we’ gave you.” (which the elite think they can bestow or take away at their whim and that all of humanity craves and is therefore corruptible by) And if that is not enough…the elite will kill Charlie and make it look like an accident. (Keep reading…this is all set-up to prove this assertion.)

What is that system of control?

The media and entertainment industry of course.  Specifically, music and film.

I can hear a question forming in your mind already…

“How does Charlie Sheen getting fired by CBS connect to child sacrifice rituals at the Bohemian Grove and the Devil? Let alone your assertion he may be in danger of being killed off for simply having an opinion on 9/11 that is not popular in the so-called mainstream of American politics?”

You are going to need another vodka shot AND tequila chaser for the rest of this story…and keep the bottles close at hand. We are about to go another level deeper down the rabbit hole.

The elite use music and film as the number one weapon to keep the masses dumbed down and obedient to their wishes. This should be obvious to most, but many still don’t know just HOW this is done nor believe how pervasive and effective it is, even on so-called “intelligent” people.

Just look at these zombies.

The Borg Agenda 11 of 88

Here is one prescient comment on The Borg Agenda series from the above link:

@kamripatrice: I think you’re missing the understanding of the hidden occult force within the mainstream music industry. this force only allows “artists” that fit their guiding hands. what is this force? the elite money masters, many of whom believe in transhumanism……a scientific world view that projects the end of disease and death. sounds nice? they can’t have everyone living forever. that’s why we have a chemical dumbing down/eugenics program being carried out against us.

The Borg…transhumanism…this is precisely the dehumanizing cult the elite religiously believe in and are programming your children, you and I, to “plug” into and they are damn good at it.  Transhumanism = God to these psychopaths.  Their plans would have remained a secret, but the Internet it seems is a haven for non-conforming malcontents that just don’t seem to like sitting still in their elementary school desk chair like obedient little girls.

The elite are able to maintain this secret method of control (secrecy being the only source of power they actually have) by keeping regular folk outside the music and film industry unaware of how it actually works. This is why Aaron was approached to join the elite…they assume power, fame and wealth corrupts all of humanity…but they found a man it did not work on. Ironically, Aaron is now dead and while it appears to be natural causes, one never knows in this world “why” so-and-so died all of a sudden, especially if they use their elite “gifted” fame and wealth to actually do good in the world by trying to expose these bastard enemies of humanity.

The elite cult of death, much like the Borg cult of cultural / individual death, operates at the highest levels of our political, economic and entertainment world. They all belong to the Bohemian Grove cult of “dull care,” of draining away freedom, compassion, empathy and love in Man so that he can be reduced to an animal, and therefore more easily tamed and controlled. While there is some evidence for this manipulation of the masses in the film industry, because of the nature of the medium, it is not as effective a mass programming tool because it is more intelligent in its application, requiring more complex and lengthy visuals and words without rhythm or rhyme to create symbolic associations in the mind to corrupt and control. You may also note, books and writing are the worst form of control, it requires far too much brain power and actual thinking to mold anyone into a slave by words alone. That is until you have them hypnotized. Once hypnotized, books and films do an AMAZING job of keeping so called “intelligent” people completely stupid and dumb to the lies they have been fed to believe are true their whole lives.

A far more effective initial programmer, and maintainer, of a hypnotized mind and psyche is music, especially on youth which, as in the Ceremony of Care, is the primary target of corruption for these occultists.  But music’s tools of corruption are requiring even more brazen and blatant means of occult persuasion today. Elvis’ swinging hips and Marilyn Monroe’s wind blown skirt just don’t cut it anymore.

Just what… the fuck… is this video about?

Do you think mind control of a living person is possible?  That there is a scientific method of steps and processes that can allow a person to hijack the mind of a human being to do their bidding?  Is that not the ENTIRE PREMISE behind the memory loss of the main character in the movie trilogy The Bourne Identity? I believe Lady Gaga is such a mind controlled puppet of satanic occultists. She literally has no control over what she says and does. This might sound ridiculous to you, but if you are not aware of how the mind and sub-conscious can be influenced and 100% co-opted psychologically by a definite and predictable process of exposure to an abusive and toxic mental environment, why would you think otherwise? To truly understand how evil these occultists are, you have to understand what they believe about man and human nature – that he is an animal and like all animals, responds only to material stimuli and can therefore be programmed as such. Hence, the ever more pervasive and increasing western cultural push toward overt sexuality and materialism in every facet of our lives.

Ironically… the exposing of this secret system of elite control of the masses comes from the Islamic youth movement. And they do a much better job than Alex Jones because they DO go into the satanic religious aspect of the elite, which Jones rarely does. The very people we are being programmed to believe want all of America and the west dead are the ones trying to wake us up to the satanic hypnosis we are under. There is another version of “extreme Islam” the media and the elite will do everything they can to prevent you from ever finding and learning about.  It is a version of Islam whose primary focus is directed at love, truth and man rising to his highest state of spiritual, intellectual and emotional well being for which God created him to pursue by his own choice.

The documentaries I am about to show you are all Islamic based so if you have a MSM hypnotic knee-jerk reaction to mistrust anything coming out of Islam, you might as well stop reading right now, I have lost you. If you continue reading, if you watch them in there entirety, you will realize that the ONLY religious body that talks any sense about what is happening in the world today comes from the Islamic traditions.

Still with me?  Here is the first documentary that is a must watch… the satanic undercurrents of the American music industry.

THE MUSIC INDUSTRY EXPOSED – References (Part 1/11)

More than any other form of media, music has always had the strongest hypnotic affect on the human mind for its ability to trigger primal emotions. Music, after all, is the universal language of humanity. But what does the music of today communicate? Just listen to those lyrics in Bad Romance… and understand… that CHILDREN are singing these songs and corrupt, western, feminist society thinks there is NOTHING WRONG with that – in fact, it’s cute!

Can you say… pros-ti-tot? This gentlemen, is the Western “empowered woman” of the future. And you wonder why Muslims want NOTHING to do with American culture infecting the lives of their women and children? Muslims don’t hate America… they hate the pervasive SATANIC influence it seems to be gripped by that is overtly sexualizing CHILDREN not even in their teens yet.

These poor children… if their parents knew the TRUE reason why the elite LOVE this propagation of deviant sexual mores amongst children… they would be aghast. The elite know very well what they are doing and they want children as corrupt and degenerate as adults. Nothing is sacred to these people because… the corruption and sacrifice of children… of innocence and youth… is precisely what the elite believe GIVES THEM POWER in the world.

It is POWER and CONTROL… not just profit… these people want.

And it all goes back to that Owl worshiping Moloch god in Babylon.

The Wake up Project – The Arrivals

Note: Since I found this Arrivals series, the wakeupproject.com site has been hacked by the elite and shut down. All that is left of it is the forum.  It seems… Islamic youth were getting too close to actually putting together the WHOLE PICTURE and waking up far, far, far too many sheeple. You will have to find the whole series on YouTube where you can.

I understand in asking you to view these documentary videos, I am asking you to take a LOT of spare time away from your life. But honestly, what kind of life are you living if it is not awake to the programming you are being bombarded with on a daily basis?

To summarize as briefly as I can… The Arrivals documentary is an ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE of current political and cultural events as they are unfolding in the world today and have so in the past. It is an opinion and in a truly free society, the expression of such is fully protected. If you watch these documentaries with an open mind knowing that religious bias (for or against) is NOT an excuse to dismiss facts and truths revealed, you will… more than any other online documentary available… come to realize the extent to which society is being programmed and played like puppets by satanic worshipping occultists.

Music is the strongest and first of the strings the elite puppet masters use to hook directly into our psyches and keep us zombies to their plans. Especially children since the earlier you can program them, the harder it will be for them to break the mind control they are under as adults. Just look at the iPod zombies walking around you in their own world, completely oblivious to other people, humanity, around them. Music goes after our reptilian brain, the one that craves sex and is prone to violence, while movies et all go after our higher intelligent brain, where the ego resides once hypnotized and then does a double mind-fuck on the intellectual level once we are programmed at the animal level. But it is music and the artists who make it that the elite first seek to co-opt into their plans by promising wealth and fame. That is also why the elite have an absolute 100% iron clad, Satanic hand grip of control on the music industry – and why file sharing and the internet’s ability to take away that control frightens them so much. A musical artist that goes against their wishes simply cannot be tolerated and will never “make it” in music. Film? Has far less influence which is why scathing documentaries are allowed to some degree that reveal what the elite have in store for us. But musicians? These are the poets of our age and as in the past, the poets are the ones dictators fear the most for they are the ones that can arouse the passions of the masses against them.

The Music Industry Exposed documentary shows what the elite in that industry do to ensure the psychological plan of power and control over the masses keeps propagating itself. The long and short of it? Keep the masses focused on dehumanizing and shallow sexual and materialistic imagery and lifestyles. The documentary breaks down precisely what the elite in the music industry worship, more than anywhere else – Satan, the Devil. They believe in Devil worship because they feel they have evidence and proof of his existence and that Satan will grant them power and control in this world if they but do his bidding.

The Arrivals pt.27 (Why Satanism is Practiced by Our Leaders)

I know I know.  If you are an atheist reading this, an agnostic, or simply a skeptic… it is hard to fathom your rational and reasoning brain to understand why this “stuff of fairy tales and ancient myths for man’s pre-historic psychological health” has ANY relevance to the scientific 21st century other than to propagate delusion by man and keep him “chained” to religious dogma and oppression.

All of those objections are for the secular/liberal movement against GOD! You don’t see Dawkins writing The Satan Delusion now do you? Just because you do not believe in God does not mean he does not exist. And for Satanic occultists, their faith in the Devil and his power giving co-operation with man only exists BECAUSE these occultists know God and his creative loving power DOES exist. You might not believe in God… occult Satanists do. In worshipping the Devil, these elite occultists have chosen to actively go against God and fight to corrupt man on earth in an attempt to become God’s themselves, as Satan promises them. Is that not the thrust of the transhumanist movement? That technology will ultimately give man the omniscient power and wisdom of God and be free from death itself, from God’s final judgement?

What is important for the non-religious is this… there are people who DO believe in God… and more importantly, in SATAN and act on these beliefs.

You really need to watch Part 27 of the Arrivals to begin to grasp this part of my argument before continuing, but only if you can’t take as a given the above statement for the purpose of logical argument.

So… what is the Devil’s bidding? What does Lucifer ask of thee in return for power and wealth and fame on this earthly plane?

To corrupt man from pursuing the higher, spiritual path toward God and love and prove to God that he, Lucifer, was right – that Man does not deserve Lucifer’s/Iblis’ respect and he was right to rebel against God in asking him to prostrate before Man, God’s creation above the angels (for that is what Satan is, a fallen angel, and God made man above the angels in giving him choice to choose good over evil, where as the angels cannot choose and must obey God). Satanic symbolism is everywhere in music videos today – especially in the blatant sexual imagery – and is fully explained in the Music Industry Exposed series. If you don’t believe symbols have any control over your mind, you had best read Carl Jung’s book Man and His Symbols as soon as you can. Symbols are EVERYTHING to the occult elite because it is how you program man. As an analogy, if symbols have no influence over us, WHY is getting a logo right so damn important for marketing in the advertising industry? Get the logo right… like Apple Computer Inc… and have imagery and ideas/feelings associated with that logo in the target consumer’s mind… the product sells itself by THE SYMBOLOGY OF THE LOGO ALONE.  That is just one example.  Here is a more popular and recent use of symbols that are freeing and empowering by a popular rap artist – Eminem.

Listen to those lyrics closely and the symbolism in the video. I am not blowing smoke up your ass… but the Devil will if you are not paying attention!  Contrast the imagery and feeling in I’m Not Afraid to Lady Gaga’s Bad Romance?  What VALUES and BELIEFS do each express?  Just artistic expression?  I’m the one blowing smoke up your ass thinking there is MORE to these videos than what appears on the surface? Do you remember Eminem’s prior videos as a blonde clown and psychotic killer?  Quiet the contrast no?  Why the change?  What does he “rap” about now?  Taking a stand, being a father, living his own truth and life.

You could try and read my lyrics off of this paper before I lay ‘em
But you won’t take the sting out these words before I say ‘em
Cause ain’t no way I’ma let you stop me from causin mayhem
When I say I’ma do somethin I do it,
I don’t give a damn what you think,
I’m doin this for me, so fuck the world
Feed it beans, it’s gassed up, if it thinks it’s stoppin me
I’ma be what I set out to be, without a doubt undoubtedly
And all those who look down on me I’m tearin down your balcony

It’s a game called circle and I don’t know how, I’m way too up to back down
But I think I’m still tryin to figure this crap out
Thought I had it mapped out but I guess I didn’t, this fuckin black cloud
still follows, me around but it’s time to exorcise these demons
These muh’fuckers are doin jumpin jacks now!

And I just can’t keep living this way
So starting today, I’m breaking out of this cage
I’m standing up, I’ma face my demons
I’m manning up, I’ma hold my ground
I’ve had enough, now I’m so fed up
Time to put my life back together right now! (now)

I think I got a tear in my eye, I feel like the king of
my world, haters can make like bees with no stingers
and drop dead, no more beef flingers
No more drama from now on, I promise
to focus solely on handlin my responsibilities as a father
So I solemnly swear to always treat this roof, like my daughters
and raise it, you couldn’t lift a single shingle on it!
Cause the way I feel, I’m strong enough to go to the club
or the corner pub, and lift the whole liquor counter up
Cause I’m raising the bar
I’d shoot for the moon but I’m too busy gazin at stars
I feel amazing and I’m [not afraid chorus]

Are these not the EXACT words the MRM and MGTOW advocates sing from their revolution hymnals as to what men need to do to defeat feminism?  This is why I wrote about the fear of manning up.  The MRM is far greater than just the defeat of feminism… it is literally the tearing down of 1000s of years of elite lies and control over a sleeping population that, without the technology of the internet, would never have awoken to.  Now… I am sure someone will say you could read ANYTHING into those lyrics.  I acknowledge your argument.  All I am attempting to show is this – there is CLEARLY a change in how Eminem is now pursuing his music career compared to before and I ask you. Why the change?  He was making money, he was a “star”, our feminist culture “loved” the new “rain man” Eminem.  WHY did he drop all that crap and go back to his roots?

I say it is because he was coming out of a hypnotic state the music industry subjected him to… something they subject all of us to… in exposing him to a toxic mental environment of fame, wealth and “power” (in the sense he could now do anything he wanted) and of course, sex, drugs and alcohol.  Are these not the very methods, if more highly refined, that subverted the personality of Jason Bourne in the movie series I eluded to earlier?  Do you really think psychopaths OBSESSED with CONTROL over other people to get what they want would not expend EVERY resource they had to perfecting and applying mind control on individuals, on masses of people, if they could?

A typical refutation of my theory might sound something like this…

“If psychopathic occult satanists controlled the music industry and the artists in it, they would not allow Eminem to sing this song of freeing his soul and mind from their power.  You sir, are an idiot!”

Or… to quote Ferdinand who in adding a note linking to his refutation of my entire article helped to prove my point even more…

“The mere fact that you are still sitting in front of your laptop in your mom’s basement and not being tortured in a secret military prison is a refutation of everything you paranoiacs believe in.”

A valid argument… but is it true?

First They came… – Pastor Martin Niemoller

First they came for the communists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

My refutation is as follows.

First – The human mind belongs to its owner, the hypnotized/controlled, NOT the hypnotizer/controller.  It’s owner can break its programming at ANY TIME and go off on their own. In some cases, the people they try to control (like Tupac) are simply not programmable; they are too INDEPENDENT MINDED and therefore, must be taken out if they threaten breaking the elite’s programming of the masses.

Second – the elite are the ones who are SLAVES to power, money, fame and sex.  They simply DO NOT COMPREHEND that there are human beings out there NOT motivated by those four, and only those four, factors.  That means that if an artist makes them TONNES OF MONEY, they are not about to stop him from making more money for them (i.e Michael Jackson). They will simply use time and pressure to continue to try and get said person to “submit”, or just give up and go away in silence, because they believe, falsely of course, that in time, ALL human beings submit to money and power and the opportunity to attain both OR will shut up and be silent when threatened with the taking away of all they have (life, money, family, etc).  When a person does not, the elite don’t know how to control such a person because that person is completely outside their world view and therefore totally unreadable and unpredictable – the very thing that scares the elite the most… total loss of power and control over a human being.

Third – The elite ALLOW free men, such as myself and Alex Jones, to run loose for the very reason they know we will be perceived as paranoid tin-foil-hatter’s by the masses they have under their hypnotic spell.  This also allows the fundamental rule in controlling people to continue to do its work – divide and conquer, keep people at each other’s throats instead of teaming up to take out the elite puppet masters.  So yes… there ARE going to be people who are able to type away at their laptop, or my iMac in this case, and get away with “exposing” the elite’s plans.  The elite actually have RESPECT for men like me, because we are not one of the “herd” of useless eaters they are trying to annihilate.  That said… if you start attracting attention to yourself… and threaten to truly expose the elite’s plans, you will be taken out.  People complain Alex Jones is nothing but a loud mouth blow hard fear-monger.  You bet he is… he HAS TO BE… because as long as he is LOUD and people are very aware of him and what he is saying… the elite simply can’t rub him out… it would be too obvious.  That said, if the elite ever feel Alex has gone too far… he will be snuffed, no ifs, ands or buts about it.  These guys PLAY FOR KEEPS, no fucking around.

The argument used by good people to refute all I have written here – that if a conspiracy existed, they would not allow people to talk about it - is PRECISELY how the elite stay in power; by continuing to have most people believe in the lie there is no open conspiracy against them.  Hence, my opening quite by Cicero to this whole piece.  In fact… here is Zbigniew Brzezinski SAYING AS MUCH himself.

Just watch that devil SMILE as he OPENLY talks about how the elite manipulate world affairs.  ZB is positively GIDDY inside, barely containing his pleasure, like a school girl talking about her first boy crush with her pajama party friends.  For those not familiar with deceptive body language… I suggest you start learning.

Is not feminism a conspiracy? Are we in the MRM not labeled crazy and insane for advocating its truth?  Is feminism not a plainly open conspiracy against men?

Yet I am the crazy person for advocating what I do here… that an elite group of psychopathic, satanic, uber-wealthy individuals are in cahoots to try and oppress ALL OF MANKIND.

I think it also goes without saying that The Bourne Identity is another, albeit fictional, example of the EXACT kind of black op, military/espionage shi-nan-igans that goes in in the REAL WORLD that every American denies going on in their own country.  Why… WHY… are we invading Libya?  You really think those “rebels” are home grown “freedom fighters?”  Can you say CIA and Washington backed  Mujahideen in Afghanistan in the 1970s/80s?  (Which was also the SOLE BRAIN CHILD of Brzezinski to sucker Russia into an un-winnable, continuous, 10 year, guerrilla war to bankrupt and destroy the USSR… cough… Bueller… cough… USA in Afghanistan/Iraq/Pakistan/Libya/next… cough…Bueller)  But I digress.

The elite don’t need ABSOLUTE control, they only need enough of it to keep the occult hypnotic affect working on the masses, not those that are the tools of hypnosis.  Secondly, the hypnotic control over the masses works best when the people are fighting each other over what is true!  You saying there is no conspiracy, me saying there is… and no one looking at the puppets pulling the strings of both.   That is why the elite also allow others to speak out about what is essentially and open conspiracy.  Look at the Lady Gaga and Eminem music videos again… it is so clear.   I admit, I could be being played for a fool… but the fact I am aware I might be I think puts me in a better position to argue my points made here as being true.  Hell… even Eminem has not got this shit figured out… but he does know one thing… it is a game, and if you don’t see it and refuse to learn who the other players are, you are going to be taken for a ride.

That is why the “war” between good and evil… God and Lucifer… is just that… a war where both sides have their champions and traitors, there wins and losses.  It is a war for your very soul… if you even believe you have one in our western, feminist, godless culture.

Like Tu-Pac and Michael Jackson, Eminem has woken up to the occult and demonizing affect the music industry was having on his life and that of his fans – and he has turned his life around and decided to fight back. Unlike Tu-Pac and MJ, he has not gone far enough to be a threat to the elite… yet. But make no mistake, he is not playing the game anymore according to their rules. You will also note, Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, Rihanna et all are not even trying to break out of their corrupt satanic programming, they are reveling in it! Sex… fame… stardom… male attention… female jealousy… women are SLAVES to their animal nature. Men like Eminem are are genetically designed to break free the earthly plane of sexual animality and climb Jacob’s Ladder to a higher spiritual state. But I digress.

Think I am kidding about the danger to Eminem?

Tu-pac’s last album before he was killed was The Don Killuminati The 7 Day Theory.

KILL-uminati.

Of course, there was also Tu-pac’s recorded speech about using his money and the power of his fame to form a new political party in the U.S. and become president. (Scrub to 2:39)

And make no mistake… Tupac believed in God, ladies and gentleman, in a power far higher and greater than man will ever be able to  to conceive of.

Tupac peeped the game… and he was not the only one.

This… an Islamic look at the life struggle against the Satanic music industry powers by Michael Jackson… reveals just why he was most likely killed before his THIS IS IT tour return to the 21st century world of music.

Michael Jackson was a VERY well read, intelligent and spiritual man who also definitely believed in God and his love for mankind. You dismiss the above Islamic video documentary about MJ at your own risk, and only because the media, as they are doing to Charlie Sheen now, has so successfully smeared his character that most will not believe anything other than “Jacko is wacko.”

Now… just for a minute, a thought experiment… can you imagine the EFFECT MJ’s coming out as being a Muslim on his THIS IS IT tour would have had on the world at the height of Islamic demonization and hysteria?

Ever wonder WHY Michael Jackson, one of the single most musically creative geniuses our modern world has ever witnessed, simply disappeared off the map of the music industry in the 90s and stopped making music?

MJ was no longer willing to go along with the elite’s plans (if he ever did) to ramp up the Satanic/sexual/de-humanizing content and subliminal messages of the music that was to come in the future – his “day” in music had run its course of usefulness to the music elite.  The music he wished to make, music that uplifted Man and his struggle against his animal nature toward love and higher intellectual and emotional well being? Universal love for all children and nature?

Feel THAT?  The power in MJ’s lyrics, his orchestrational arrangement… MJ was drawing on an other worldly power as well… God… the Creator… infinite love, justice and good.  His music BLOWS OUT OF THE WATER anything coming from the satanic music industry today.  If MJ had new material… and a plan to come back to music in the 21st century STILL at the top of his game as the documentary THIS IS IT clearly shows…

Nope… MJ had to go.  Michael Jackson would have been a nuclear bomb of love and compassion in a world about to fall off the cliff into another war of death in the middle east for absolutely no reason at all, and the reasons given outright lies.

This is just a sample of the lyrics from Earth Song.  My interpretations are in [note].

What about all the peace

That you pledge your only son [Jesus]…

What about apathy [killing of dull care]

(What about us)

I need you [Allah]

(What about us)

What about nature’s worth [Allah's creation]

(ooo, ooo)

It’s our planet’s womb [where Man was created from]

What about the holy land [the birthplace of the truth]

(What about it)

Torn apart by greed [the lies and hypocrisy that is corporate globalization.]

(What about us)

What about the common man [the one of no greed and of true love for others]

(What about us)

Can’t we set him free [the prison within which he is chained, his own mind, hypnosis against his true good self by the Devil]

(What about us)

What about baby boy [jesus]

What about the days [the days of Jesus' ministry]

What about all their joy [the love inspired by Christ in the world of man]

What about the man

What about the crying man

What about Abraham

What about death again [the only thing that wakes man up from his spiritual slumber.]

(ooo, ooo)

Do we give a damn [dull care, the killing of empathy in the world by the occult elite]

For this with eyes to see… it is as plain as day.

What people don’t realize about the music industry, the stuff you hear ad nauseum on the radio and the “popular” artists all over print and the media, is that if you don’t sing what THE ELITE want you to sing… you will not make it in the industry… you will be a nobody. And what do they sing about today? Rainman and umbrella’s apparently… and Bad Romance’s where a woman is forcibly stripped by strangers, alcohol poured down her throat, dressed up as a stripper, forced to dance erotically before male thugs/gangsters who bid on her sexual display to own her only to wind up burnt to a crisp for their purchase with two massive goat heads on the wall as the camera pans out. I mean come on! The satanic and occult imagery/themes are SO BLATANT in music now you would have to be a complete idiot not to at least consider the possibility that these messages to your children in the music industry are put there ON PURPOSE AND FOR A REASON.

This is what they used to sing about in the 1950s.

The stark reversal of values between today and yesterday… is impossible to miss.

The Devil demands worship and sacrifice…. and unless a music artist is willing to sign his life away in blood to become famous and therefore go along with the industry “theme” of sex and violence… you will not succeed in this industry… it is that simple.  Just look at what Sony produced for a video of the new, previously unreleased Michael Jackson song Hollywood Tonight – a young girl “dreams” of fame in Hollywood, works as stripper, and when her “success” comes… she goes out drinking and the downward spiral of soul destruction in the music industry begins. (Can you say Brittany Spears?) Do you think if MJ was alive… that THAT is the kind of video he would have allowed to be produced for his music?

Which brings us all the way back to Charlie Sheen.

Look at his character on 2 1/2 Men. What kind of man was he playing? A man in total submission to his baser animal instincts of sex without emotion and the corruption of his soul with shallow relationships, alcohol and drugs. Charlie was the “bad boy” and his lifestyle was literally being put on display in a family sitcom. I finally caught one episode the other night (I turned off the TV about 10 years ago). What was it about?

• Opening… Charlie talking about a $1500 “relationship” with a girl to his adolescent nephew… who was trying to get to first base with a girl from school on the couch at home that “drunk uncle Charlie” interrupted.
• Charlie’s mother an uncaring drunk and openly talking about her dry vagina in need of lubrication.
• Hooking his mother up with an apparent suitor, who turns up to his house with a 30 something date 20 years his junior who is paying her rent in exchange for having sex with him. (For that is all sex is, an economic exchange as Bad Romance shows right?)
• In the end… the mother and the 30 something “hot babe” end up in a lesbian love tryst in the bathroom while the old dude she got dolled up for talks about the Viarga kicking in he was hoping to use on the 30 year old that night.
• Oh… did I forget to mention there is a CHILD in this family that is exposed to all of this?

THIS is “family entertainment” in the 21st century.  The Cosby Show… Elvis and Ann-Margaret… it is not. I grew up on the Flintstones, the enshrining of a true patriarchal family culture in animation. Today? Kids grow up on Family Guy which in and of itself is one giant, thrusting middle finger pointing out to America just how freaking debauched and hypocritical it has become about “family values.” How far man has fallen. Also important to note… after watching the above incredible music videos… corrupt or uplifting moral themes simply do not have the SAME AFFECT on the mind in a TV show or film that music video’s can have. You can feel it… an emotional level of influence that is 1000 times more powerful than TV or film. Without music, the “satanic hook” is a lot harder to set.

It is not that hard to find these satanic… or for those who still don’t believe, simply immoral and corrupting… influences in our western entertainment culture once you start looking them. And no, you don’t have to go “looking for it” to find it as so many intellectuals will argue trying to refute my claim. Maybe, back in the days of Elvis and the Flintstones you would have to go looking and “imagine” seeing things that are not there to be seen. You would have to then because the satanic elite simply could NOT get away with that level of open, public, debauched corruption in the media as the MORALS AND VALUES of the times would NEVER have allowed it. After all, they still have to make money while they are doing their corruption and can’t risk completely offending their audience. Today? I think we have gone well past the point of decency in music and film – nothing is morally sacred or sacrosanct any more. For those that argue these images have no effect on society… if they did not… why would the elite be so focused on producing them, and with each generation, crossing more and more social taboos? If images of sex and violence had ZERO effect on you and your children’s psyche… do you really think those with the money and power to create them… in WANTING more money, and power and control… would keep producing them if they did not get the results they desired? The answer of course is… it does work… is working… and that is why you see it blatantly every where now. They truly think they have won the battle for your mind and can do anything to anyone now to corrupt people with impunity. And why not? God, as Dawkins has apparently proven, does not exist so ergo, neither does the Devil right? I told you it was his greatest trick.

Everything was fine and good… as long as Charlie kept playing his part, both on and off screen, and did not do anything to take on the corrupt powers of the entertainment industry that reap not just profit, but POWER AND CONTROL over their audience.

One year after Charlie’s open letter of 20 questions to the President about 9/11… he is on the streets and out of work.

Coincidence?

After all the research I have done… and you have now been shown… not a chance in hell.

Like Tu-Pac and others, if Charlie does not “get the message” he will get another lesson… a permanent one. If you have watched the Music Industry Exposed documentary, you know now the elite ALWAYS send a message before they start to smear and tear down the fame and wealth around a star that is no longer in compliance with the Luciferian occult pledge of obedient submission. If Charlie Sheen keeps speaking out about 9/11 and other “wrong” topics… especially if, like Tu-Pac, his star power and attraction to the masses just keeps going up… we might very well find him overdosed and dead, but I doubt it will be by his hand. The zombie public would accept it, but for those of us awake and can ask the logical question…

“All those years of EXPERIENCE with MASSIVE QUANTITIES of drugs and alcohol without overdose… who becomes TOTALLY CLEAN AND SOBER COLD TURKEY… suddenly goes “too far” and overdoses in a “relapse?”

Nope… I for one won’t buy it for a second.

This is the fight Charlie is in. Charlie is fighting the elite that think they control this animal human world by ancient occult and Satanic rituals and practices.

Charlie Sheen is in a fight with the Devil.

The MRM is more than a fight against feminism. What humanity is fighting for is literally the next age of human spiritual evolution. Either we transcend our bonds of animal behavior and control by these psychopaths… or we slide wholly and completely back into them and the human race exterminates itself.

And look… just in time and much to the relief of liberal atheists everywhere… SCIENCE comes to the rescue!

Political Ponerology – A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes

“In the author’s opinion, Ponerology reveals itself to be a new branch of science born out of historical need and the most recent accomplishments of medicine and psychology. In light of objective naturalistic language, it studies the causal components and processes of the genesis of evil, regardless of the latter’s social scope. We may attempt to analyze these ponerogenic processes which have given rise to human injustice, armed with proper knowledge, particularly in the area of psychopathology. Again and again, as the reader will discover, in such a study, we meet with the effects of pathological factors whose carriers are people characterized by some degree of various psychological deviations or defects.” (Lobaczewski, 42)

Evil… the devil… Satan / Iblis… is apparently nothing more than a misfiring of our essential humanity in some individuals. A rare 1 to 5% of them on the planet as a whole, but wow, the damage they can wreak. Unfortunately, this misfiring is at the deepest of psychological levels and is the very reason WHY so much of the above “conspiracy”… while “fictitious,” “impossible,” even “crazy” sounding… is capable of being carried out on a large scale of the population without its awareness.

I want to promote this book that, while a hard read, goes to the very root of the evil I have been describing.

Evil is not a religious dichotomy. It is not some flaw or fundamental sin in man. Evil is quiet literally a mental disease, a disease called psychopathy and the ponerogenic process it can have on the social mass of humanity.

I know I will do a great disservice to the author’s work, but I will try my humble best to summarize Andrzej M. Łobaczewski argument for the science of evil adjusted for political purposes. (Much of this terminology is BRAND NEW because it is a wholly new and previously unknown and unpublished branch of psychology.) I HIGHLY recommend ordering and reading this book. It will blow your mind.

So what is Political Ponerology?

1. Evil is a psychological condition.
2. That condition is psychopathy and it’s attendant maladies characteropathy, narcissism and anti-social disorder – they all feed off each other.
3. Ponerogenesis is the affect one (or several) psychopaths have on the psychological well being of a social mass (whether an office or a nation) as influenced by the acts of psychological control and oppression that psychopaths are expertly capable of performing – first on individuals, then on a large scale over massive groups of people.
4. That once the ponerogenesis affect has taken root in a social mass, it begins to affect the  psychology of that mass… en masse… and is hard to reverse.
5. That psychopaths are capable of such massive psychological control over masses of people because of the very thing that makes them unique, which is completely foreign to normal humans… their inability to feel any emotion whatsoever, save anger… and are therefore free of the fears, anxieties, and self-doubts that affect “normal” human beings as they go about their daily lives trying to assert self-esteem and self-confidence in the world while being forever buffeted by restrictive “feelings.”
6. That the “evil” that has been committed in the world at the political level… can be shown to have been the work of psychopaths… and this effect is the slow corruption and distortion of the mass social psyche of a nation’s people to become more in line with that of the psychopaths world – total non-caring, non-feeling for anyone and anything other than one’s most primal animal desires.
7. Psychopaths WANT to kill normal human beings… because to them… we are not normal. Our “caring” nature is a problem for them. Human beings who have “feelings” like love, sadness, compassion, empathy etc. get in the way of the psychopath doing whatever he or she wants to do. “If you ‘care,’ you are not free.” would be the psychopaths motto for life.
8. That the process of political ponerogenesis is something that can be scientifically identified, tracked and therefore diagnosed, reversed, treated and prevented. In so doing, “evil” in the world, while not removable from society as it is a part of man himself, can be limited in scope by understanding the process by which “evil” runs away with itself, carrying mankind into its most black and darkest of moments. (The Nazi Jewish holocaust and Stalin’s Ukrainian famine being but two examples.)

That is a short overview. This blog article goes into much greater depth and relevance to the world we live in today.

Gift of the Magi to the Elect – A Christmas Essay

You see, within the circle of my family and friends, we share common values and aims that are based on love and caring and sharing, and all around us we see a world where those values have been degraded and corrupted to the point that they are either no longer recognizable, or they have disappeared altogether. This is incredibly painful and even moreso because we know that the way the world could be is so different from what is, and that this “what is” will, inevitably, affect us personally.

That is all I will write on ponerology. Get the book… read it. It will blow every concept of “evil” and the inexplicable acts committed in its name by “the devil” you have ever had. After reading it myself, the author warns as early as the 1980s that America is in the process of undergoing political ponerogenesis. America… is run and controlled… by psychopaths… and is slowly turning all of America and the world into people with psychopathic traits and neurosis – uncaring, unfeeling, unquestioning robots hellbent on their own extinction.

Thankfully, being psychopaths, they have zero creative intelligence and once given full reign of control over a society/nation, they literally consume it and themselves in an orgy of death and destruction to finally collapse from within – Rome being the prime example. Sadly, if a country has succumbed that far along the ponerogenesis process, the result is usually horrific for all involved. (And this process, ponerogenesis, I just realized can be clearly seen in the five stages of development of a fascist state.)  Doubly sad, and terrifying, is that these psychopaths no actually run the globe, not just “Rome.”  Man’s extinction, is a VERY REAL possibility.

Which brings us to the bottom of the rabbit hole… the root of evil in America that proves the above has come true – that psychopaths run America and only great disaster lays ahead for the people’s of this once proud and free nation.

At least the gay movement in the USA is finally starting to come out and blast these Republicans for what they are… outright flaming hypocrites.

But at least those men are simply denying their true sexual nature.  These guys… are the truly fucked up ones.

CHILD PROSTITUTION, SATANISM AND THE CIA PART.1/7

Conspiracy of Silence – Illuminati Pedophiles in Washington D.C.

Do you remember the “sacrifice” of children in the Bohemian Grove Ceremony of Care I told you to make a mental note of? I bet you are wishing you had taken that damn blue pill link now aren’t you?

Now THAT is seriously evil shit… and it is right in your political backyard America. THIS is the “issue” we should be blogging… and talking… about that fucking matters. You have reached the bottom of the rabbit hole… welcome, to the desert of the real.

The below is John Decamp’s intro to the Conspiracy of Silence documentary. This is the lifestyle and “sexuality” of some of the psychopaths who are your American political, cultural and economic business “elite.”

It’s a web of intrigue…  It starts in our holy of holies… Boys Town Nebraska… one of the most respected institutions in the United States… and… spreads out like a spider web to Washington DC, right up to the steps of the nations capital, the steps of the White House… involves some of the most respected and powerful and richest businessmen of this United States of America… and the centre piece of the entire web is the USE OF CHILDREN… FOR SEX… and drug dealing, and drug couriers… the compromising of politicians… the compromising of businessmen… but worst of all, the corruption of key institutions of government that have the duty and responsibility to make sure these things never happen.

There you go guys… go your own way, just let the whole of society go down in flames… let it ALL burn, even the children. After all, God does not exist, we are on our own in a total and complete state of Nietzschean nihilism with no purpose to our lives what-so-ever.

That is EXACTLY what the psychopathic elite want… they want men to stop caring about anything… because then, you become just like them.

There is no need so summarize the rest of the documentary or the other one on YouTube linking all this shit to the CIA – the hand of Satan in the world today. This is something you will just have to make a choice to expose your awareness to or not for yourself.

Two words… fictitious bogeyman… and here you are 15, 243 words total later. I think this piece is long enough. If you are still here reading this and have watched those last two video documentary links I just gave you… you are going to need to go out and buy more vodka and tequila anyway… to go for a long walk… and try to straighten out all the cognitive dissonance shit your head is exploding from with what you have  just learned is true about the world you live in. When you come back, I hope you will, in some way, try to do what limited amount you can to continue to expose this lie that is engulfing the world… that the “devil” does not exist and we men should all simply go our own way and let the whole of the feminist infected world go down in flames.

“There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.”

- Henry David Thoreau

I am tired of hacking at branches.

Let’s go for the root.

Maximus – One man doing his masculine duty to return the light of “God” – Love, Justice, Truth, Liberty and Respect – to a world engulfed in darkness, lies, hypocrisy, vanity and death.

There seems to be an elephant in the room of the MRM.  A topic that is simply too taboo and controversial to bring up.

Manning up.

It has become the creme-de-la-creme of shaming language for feminists, conservatives and liberals to throw in men’s faces for our lack of “doing what needs to be done” – i.e. being responsible to, taking responsibility for, society, women and children – our “duty” to put it bluntly.

Of course, in today’s feminist infected climate, to ask this of a man is to spit in his face and men in the MRM are rightfully angered and incensed by such attempts at shaming them into doing “their duty.”  Exposing this term for the hypocrisy it is in the 21st century and disposing of it to the MRM trash-bin however does not get rid of its stink or its sting.   It merely puts it aside in the hope that it will go away, but it won’t, because it is part of who we are as men.  At some point, men are going to have to take a close look at this term that has become so reviled and ask why, if it is meaningless today in a feminist culture, being told to “man up” stills evokes such powerful emotional responses.

When a man is told to “man up,” he is asked to be… a man… a leader… and that is the pivot upon which all anger and hatred at being told to “man up” is unleashed.  That, in some way, you are not being “a man.”  This anger, in my opinion, is coming from men who no longer feel they can, should or even want to be leaders – to be responsible for women, children and society – and rightly and justifiably so.  However, I think this way of thinking is a dangerous precedent for the future of mankind, for the future of man, and I for one would like to address this elephant head on.

The genesis for this piece was sparked by J Durden’s very early comment on my article On Leaders and Leadership over at The Spearhead.  J Durden asked… and I paraphrase and expand a little in logical progression…

Where is the plan?

The outline?

Suggestions on what to do?

How do we stop feminism?  What can we do to right the perilous situation so many men find themselves in today?

Where is the action?

Action is leadership.

Asking a man to man up is asking him to take action, to lead, and that is why it evokes such wide ranging emotional responses in men, especially when it comes from a woman.

This is why I am writing on this topic again, at length, in hopes my views will be better understood in a larger contextual written piece. I know what I am about to write will not be popular, but that is the very reason it needs to be written.

If our actions are stymied, if we lack a plan, if the men’s movement appears to be on the cusp of breaking out of its digital Fortress of Solitude but seems forever to be hung up on some white-knight pothole or is constantly hitting those damn mangina parking-lot speed bumps, it is because we have yet to go to the heart of the problem that we face in defeating feminism in our culture.

Love, fear and defining what it is to be masculine, what is a man.

Men are afraid to man up.  To be leaders. (and I include myself in this category to some degree, for no man is immune from this fundamental fear of masculinity.)

In my Spearhead article, J. Durden called me out on my lacking a plan of action and rightly so.  If I am going to call for men to be leaders, there should be a plan.  I think I missed it because I did not want to tell other men what they should do, as Paul Elam wisely noted in his commentary.  I wanted to simply get men thinking about leadership and incorporating it more deeply and consciously in their own lives.  However, you will notice that the simplest comments praising my article came from women ironically enough:

Thag Jones September 27, 2010 at 11:56

I have nothing to add, just that this was excellent.

Alte September 27, 2010 at 13:35

Good article. Yes, we need leadership. Paul and Welmer are both very reluctant to lead… which adds to their credibility as leaders.

No, I am not seeking female praise, just noting that the most direct and uncritical support of my article on leadership in the men’s movement came from women, and it is for a reason.  You will note Alte remarked precisely why I wrote my article – man’s reluctance to lead.  Much of this reluctance does come from the natural desire of a good man to not push his views on other men, but the majority of that reluctance comes from fear.

Anonymous  September 27, 2010 at 12:33

I think articles like this one [On Leaders and Leadership] suggest that I should want to save this society. That I owe something to a society that ultimately hates and fears me, and all I stand for. That I should personally sacrifice for the good of all. Why should I stick my neck out to save it, if all I do is place it beneath an axe? Why, after all this time, should I believe that “be a team player” isn’t the same as “warm the bench?” How is this article any different from the dozens of feminist articles encouraging men to “man up” and resume their service to the matriarchy?

Also, note that Spartacus almost made it over the Alps, but was held back by the two Celtic co-leaders. And Leonidas was betrayed twice (the oracle and the goatherd). I am no Spartacus or Leonidas, but if such great men could expect no better, I should expect no less treachery if I distinguish myself as a target.

J. Durden  September 27, 2010 at 09:38

But it’s pretty tricky dismantling and refuting the establishment. You have to be careful in the way you go about doing it, or you could make the wrong sorts of enemies. Worse, it is possible you could lose friends or loved ones.

There it is… fear… and no man can hide from it.

Fear of being being the nail that stands out to be crushed by the hammer of judgement by delusional masses still stuck in their feminist cave, trusting the shadows on the wall before them is the real world.

Fear has always been man’s number one enemy and it still is.  It is what makes Batman eminently more appealing and identifiable with than Superman.  Bruce Wayne had to conquer his fear to become the crusading vigilante he is.  The men’s movement now has to do the same.

If men want to change the status quo of a degenerate and collapsing feminist society, we are going to have to make ourselves a target and start becoming the leaders of the change we want to see in the world.

Or maybe I am assuming men want to change society for the better.  Am I alone?  Have we men in the MRM simply decided to go our own way permanently?  To leave the whole of society to go down in flames, the sooner the better?

To those men who think as much… I ask the following question…

Would the world be a better place without…

John F. Kennedy and his attempt to shut down the CIA and the US Federal Reserve?

Martin Luther King and the clarity of reason and conviction with which he spoke out about the oppression of men serving in the Vietnam war?  (as relevant a speech today as it was then, if not more so as history is, once again, repeating itself)

Ghandi and his non-violent struggle that freed the people of India, defeating the British colonial system of oppression on the men of that historic nation of peoples?

These are the speeches of masculine leaders.  They are also all dead.

These are the targets true masculine men become in deciding to take action to change the status quo, to alter the course of history and society for the better.  Are we men in the 21st century no longer capable of being such leaders?  Are these manner of men truly extinct in the world today, never to be seen again?

I think not… we just need to find our cojones and start leading again.  It is what men are designed for, it is what we do best, albeit reluctantly despite all the supposed “power” feminists say we have and use to lord over them and the natural world like dictators.

Women want leaders, desperately.  They want to be led.  They yearn to submit to leadership, both inside and outside the bedroom.  This desire in the female for leadership is embedded in her biology.  If your woman is unhappy in her relationship, sadly, it is your fault – you are not leading her, you are not being masculine, you are not being “the man.”  (too much to go into here, but suffice it to say, learning “game” is not being “the man.”)

While that may sound like I am asking you to “man up” for the feminist matriarchy, I am not.

I am asking every man to man up for patriarchy 2.0 – the salvation of civilization and society.  I am asking you to man up and become the kind of leaders, the kind of men, that Kennedy, King and Gandhi were for their time and place in history. (and again, I include myself in that exhortation.)

The vitriol and disgust that appears in the comments of some men’s blogs whenever anyone writes or says something even remotely close to being interpreted as asking men to “man up”… is the very hurdle we need to overcome and proves it is the final roadblock to a true men’s revolution going mainstream.  These angry men, and rightly so, are the hammers in the men’s movement that we need to start turning into nails.  The only voices that should be trying to drown us out are our opponents – the feminist state and its slaves.

I don’t take anything away from Anonymous’ or J Durden’s comments.  They actually were crucial in my being able to illustrate in this article some of the root problems we face in growing the men’s movement and taking it beyond the internet. They and many other men are right to sympathize and place themselves in such a position.  Why should men put our heads under the feminist axe?  Why should we sacrifice potential relations with friends and family or our career in trying to overturn the insanity of a feminist state culture?

All I have in response is…

Who else boy?

Who else is going to do it?

Are women going to do it?  You trust women to fix this mess?

Things are only going to get worse the longer men allow women to run things.

For all the whining and complaining about feminism et al, for that is what it is, no one else is going to fix society, certainly not women as is plainly evident.

It is up to men.

If society fears and hates us, so be it.

If we are made a target to be taken out.  Such is the fate of all men that try to bring about change for the better in any society or age.

Good men buckle down and go about righting the system anyway.  No one will thank us.  No one will praise us.  In fact, many will hate us and do all they can to stop us.  Ultimately, no one will care, but that is not why we are doing it.  We are here wanting to right the wrongs feminism has perpetuated on man and society because it has to be done.  Let’s stop complaining about it and just do it.

To be clear, J Durden and Anonymous are not whining nor complaining, they are simply being realistic about the situation men face today and I identified with them completely… in the past.

Now?

We need to move past this kind of realistic, even nihilistic, analysis of the situation men face and start seriously thinking about what needs to be done to correct things.  We have to start taking action.

Szebran

What should unify the MRM is the destruction of feminism.

Agreed. Simple and to the point.  Truly, a more manly summation of our goal can not be stated, nor needed.

The male weapons of feminism’s destruction are love, courage and becoming true masculine men.

But I won’t leave it there, in such a vague, cliche fashion to be easily picked apart as empty and nothing but a platitude.  Allow me, if I may, to see if I have correctly surmised the plan of action so far throughout the male blog-o-sphere.  I will then frame some of those actions in light of my above call to embrace love, reject fear, and become a more masculine man.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the actions advised to bring down feminism so far are:

1. Disengage from women.
2. Take ownership of your life. (MGTOW)
3. Don’t marry, don’t get her pregnant.
4. Learn Game in order to come out on top in relations with the curvy gender, or at least in a superior position in your dealings with women as you go about your life.
5. Disengage from the feminist matrix – reduce your taxes, reduce your debt, reduce your contributions to the system (i.e. marriage, babies and material consumption) and starve the feminist hydra to its ultimate death. (kudos barbarossa)
6. Educate and recruit other men to “the movement” now that you have freed yourself.
7. Shrug off misandry, just ignore the whole damn thing. (kudos to Paul Elam)

Let me now expose my thoughts on these actions and try to spark some debate and analysis on the first three items.  I agree with them, but not in the way most men in the MRM currently conceptualize them. The rest are of secondary importance and nothing more need be added to their already widely discussed and debated merits. (And this piece is already long enough!)

1) Disengage from women

Next to impossible.  Biologically, we love the ladies and they are everywhere.

Fidelbogen September 27, 2010 at 14:38

“As much as men here would like to wish they can just ignore women and go their own way, they can’t. We like the ladies and we like them a lot! To deny this is to deny our very nature as men.” [Maximus - On Leaders and Leadership]

I would say, speak for thyself! Let us not simply assume such things about “men”, or about their “nature as” men.

First… shrugging off misandry is one thing.

Shrugging off man’s innate, biological, genetic and Darwinian desire for sexual and romantic union with a female is like asking for the sun to revolve around the earth – not gonna happen buddy.

With the greatest of respect to Fidelbogen, this is precisely the kind of shaming language feminists use to destroy men and masculinity – lets not define men in terms of unique gender attributes; and for certain, let’s not even begin to attempt to define men in any biological, genetic, Darwinian or philosophical/religious terms.  I am writing a book to expose that much of what men are in terms of “the masculine” comes directly from our genes and man’s ability to conceptualize abstractly the ideals of justice, love, truth, liberty and respect in a way women are simply incapable of.  We need to start accepting and learning how to work with these truths about man’s nature, not in continuing the feminist denial of them, that “man/woman has no nature what-so-ever.”  Fidelbogen even used scare quotes around defining “men”… as if to even whisper of there being a definite modus-operandi within the male species of homosapien is an attack against all men… for that would mean… some men are on the right path, and others… not so much.  And it is there… right there… that fear exists in men and why so much emotion is unleashed about being asked to “man up” and the MRM movement needs to get over it.

Second… I want to address something that extends logically from the action of disengaging from women – a growing mistrust and even hatred/anger toward women.

If you mistrust and hate women, if you are angry at the current state of affairs between the genders, it is only because you have allowed these women to make their emotional frame of reference your own.  You have allowed their opinions of men, their disrespectful actions, their callous treatment of you (now fully awake you can no longer deny), to take you to a very dark, bitter and angry place, much in evidence in the comments and articles on blogs all over the MRM.

Being angry is not masculine.  Being bitter is not a manly way to live.

Shaming language?

Not at all, it is a fact all men who enter the MRM go through this phase and some never leave it, but I am telling you… it is not manly, not even remotely.

Is mistrust and anger toward women justified?

Absolutely, but we must move past this phase and that is what this article is about.  Getting past the fear and mistrust of women and finding a way to love them, and they us, once again.

Some time spent in bitterness and anger is cathartic, and much of the men’s movement is just this phase, but no good man, no masculine man, should stay there forever and wallow in it.  It is not good for your soul and ultimately, not good long-term for society.  Yes, western feminist women are almost worthless and beyond salvation, but unless you are willing to neuter yourself and remove the testosterone that courses through your body, you are going to have to deal with women… a woman, even if only your mother or sister… at some point in your life.  To appropriate Churchill’s quote for our own purposes, woman:

“is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key.“

Disengaging from women is a starting point, but it cannot… cannot… be an end point.

Finding the key to woman is.

That key is becoming a better man, a more masculine man, and leading your life and hers in love, respect and harmony together.

I here now assert that this hate for all things feminist and female in the MRM has to stop.  It has to end for this movement to truly move forward into the mainstream.

Think of feminism as nothing more than a fly in need of ignoring to rid its annoying existence from your life, and so it shall be.

That does not mean you don’t acknowledge it and its affect on your life.  You simply no longer let it dominate your thoughts or take away from you your pursuit of happiness and inner calm about who you are as a man in this screwed up, feminist world.

Continued anger, rage, hate, bitterness… serves no purpose what-so-ever and only feeds the feminist beast from the opposite angle, men learning to hate women as much as feminists hate men. (Which is precisely what the NWO elite want you to become – divide and conquer between the sexes allows the oligarch state to rule estranged and depressed men and women like slaves with impunity.)  If this were the end result of all our writings here in the MRM, feminists (and the so-called “alpha” men who control them) will truly have won.  As badly as women have and are treating men today, I simply cannot bring myself to loathe and hate them… because… I love them, and I am not ashamed to admit that.

Love comes from man, and man needs to learn to love woman in a way that allows her loving nature to naturally arise.  If women in the west today have stopped loving men, it is because we have stopped being the KIND of man they would love in abdicating our responsibility to BE masculine men and teach woman what love is.

Shakespeare was by far the most wise of masculine men.  More than any other author, his works embody all that is masculine about man and what inspires love in both man and woman.  As you can see from this passage, woman is man’s greatest teacher for she presents him with the ultimate test… become a better man, to truly discover himself, to learn things he can never discover in all the books of academia.

Far from disengaging from women, men need to learn how to re-engage them from a masculine perspective, the key to her riddle, in order to naturally affect the female to react more positively to him and to bring out his best talents and abilities.  (and vice-versa)

Before I hear cries of “down with chivalry”… that is not what Shakespeare was about, not even close.  Shakespeare was writing about being a man and being masculine, his ultimate expression of these concepts immortalized in his greatest work – Hamlet.

Perhaps talk of love is too mushy for a men’s forum, but if we do not talk about it, about loving women, then nothing we plan or take action on to end the feminist nightmare will be of any use.  What is the point of living if there is no love between men and women?  That is where the feminist movement has brought western society and is seeking to infect the whole planet with.  The Men’s Movement must go in the opposite direction – toward love and respect for gender difference.

Love and respect, NOT equality, between the genders is the core ideology… if the MRM is to have an ideology… we men have to refute feminism.  It is love and respect between men and women feminists have focused on destroying for over 50 years in their insane pursuit of hypocritical “equality” and that just goes to prove… beyond a shadow of a doubt… it is MAN that embodies these ideals since he is the target of every feminists destruction.

Disengage from women?  Yes, for now, but do not stop loving women and do not make it permanent.  The only real solution is to re-engage with and teach women how to be loving wives and mothers again once we men have become men again.

2) Take ownership of your life. (i.e. MGTOW)

This is the second reason why I wrote the leadership article for The Spearhead.  I first wanted to counter the idea that the men’s movement does not need a leader(s).  It does.  Secondly, leadership goes to the heart of men deciding to go their own way, to lead their lives for themselves and not others.  More men need to dedicate serious time to studying what leadership is and what it means/takes to be a leader.  You can’t lead a woman to happiness if you can’t lead your own life… period.  Hate the players and jerks all you want, what they have over other men is a fixed and immovable vision for how they wish to lead their lives that attracts women to them in throngs.

In the past patriarchal age, this was all men discussed.  What is a man?  What does it mean to be masculine?  How is a real, masculine man to live his life?  Where have these discussions gone?

piercedhead September 27, 2010 at 14:21

Generally, the more talk I hear about leadership, the less convinced I am by it. There is always the sneaking suspicion that what is being paraded as leadership is a recruitment drive for someone else’s point of view.

Talk about leadership and what it is to be a man always heads in the same predictable direction. A good leader would avoid it – he would lead by example.

Good point, and this is precisely what I am trying to do… lead by example.

What is that predictable direction of discussion Piercedhead speaks of?  Is it one of clashing egos?  One of judgement and condemnation of other men?  A sense of superiority over other men for feeling one is leading a more masculine and manly life?  The fear that you may not measure up to the standards of “what is a man” that social consensus and societal pressures dream up and give life to as “culture” that is plainly in evidence throughout history, even today?

Absolutely.

It is called patriarchy.

It is called measuring and testing oneself before one’s male peers not for their approval, though there may be some of that, but for the sheer challenge of it and being able to keep your head high no matter what the end result.

It is about leading the life you want to live, not what society, women or other men wish you to, and in so doing trying to discover and show other men how a “good” life can be attained for all men in living by common masculine ideals and beliefs.

It is about unleashing the creative force of men the world over to redefine for themselves who and what is a man, what is masculine, and women and 21st century feminist culture be damned.

Some men shrink from this masculine challenge with the same overarching cringe of fear they have in attempting to approach that perfect 10+ woman.  Being asked to man up, and the patriarchal culture that produced such an environment, is what created the great leaders, the great men, of past ages.  It was a clash of visions, of philosophies, of actions, and it was great.

Why are we men, in the 21st century, walking away from this proven and historical process of advancing society, of advancing mankind?

This is the process that made men men.

In denying ourselves these types of discussions, we have what we have today – a complete lack of definition for what is male or masculine, which the feminists then write for us, to which most “men” then roll over and obey in silence.  This is the reason men in the West are now the majority unemployed, the majority oppressed by the feminist state and its legal apparatus, the majority depressed, disillusioned and angry as to what a “man” is today and what he should be in the 21st century and beyond.

Men have gone silent on what is is to be a man.  Or at least western men have.  The Middle East seems to have an overflow of young, male testosterone that will no longer be silent or taken advantage of and they are taking action.  When are we going to start taking action?

My thoughts are that no matter how many men we have as readers in the MRM community, few of them are willing to go into the absolute no-go area of outright political incorrectness – that men are a definable gender, based on biology and spirit, for which the patriarchal age was its first evolutionary emergence and will be society’s eventual return.

Of course, we cannot go back to those very old days.  Not even I am that stupid or naive and nor would I want to.  The past is the past.  But those old patriarchal concepts worked to advance man and civilization for a reason – some of them, almost all of them, were and are true.  Men today need to re-imagine past masculine ideals for the 21st century and we should not be afraid to go about doing just that.  It is our very refusal as men to define what is a man… what is masculinity… in any way… out of fear of “the direction” such a discussion will take us that has led to the rise and near triumph of the feminist, matriarchal, welfare state

In having this discussion on leadership and masculinity, what it means to be a man, Piercedhead correctly points out it is going to be one man’s point of view against another’s.  What else would we expect?  That is what men do, compete with each other over ideas and vision.  Yes, I am trying to recruit other men to my point of view, I will not deny it.  If you don’t have a point of view, then I win by default.  If you do and fail to express it, then again, I win be default.

Correction… I should say she wins by default, because for the past 50+ years, that is exactly what has happened – men have completely abandoned defining themselves in terms of being a man and being masculine, leaving feminists to completely dominate the debate and define these terms for their own agenda.  No wonder the women are “winning.”  Men are not speaking up about what masculinity and being a man is.  We have completely abandoned the field of battle.  It’s pretty easy to “win” a battle when your opponent not only does not bother to show up, he is afraid to.

Here is an analogy to put the final nail in the coffin of not talking about what is a man… and by logical extension meaning that there are many “ways” man can be a man…

Take hunting for example.  If every man of a pre-historic hunting party were to INSIST there is no one single way to properly take down a mastodon… that each man should simply decide what is best for him in the hunting party and “go his own way”… just how successful do you think that hunting party would be?

Not very.  What will happen is that a “leader” will emerge based on his arguments using reason and logic and his results will show other men that “their” way of hunting is not exactly the best way to hunt.  That does not mean those men can’t leave the hunting party and go their own way anyway.  What it does show is that the process of patriarchal, male competition in simply attempting to define the best way to hunt, and recruiting men to that way, is what led to advances in weapons, in tactics and ultimately, in the success or failure of the tribe.

Far from avoiding it, talk of leadership, talk about what it is to be a man and what is masculine is vitally needed in the MRM movement right now.  We can’t avoid it and it is time we started to seriously talk about what it means to be a man again.

“He was a man.  Take him for all in all.  I shall not look upon his like again.”

- Hamlet Act I, Scene II, line 187ish

And we may never see the like of “Man” again unless we start talking about what that man is (and is not) the way Shakespeare and his contemporaries did at the pinnacle of the patriarchal, masculine age – what I call Patriarchy 1.0.

Hamlet’s pursuit for the truth about the death of his father, and his agony in attempting to do right by him, is the struggle each man faces in his life; to define what it is he stands for as a man and to translate that vision into action in the real world, not stay locked inside the insane, burning, cacophony of his wishy-washy thoughts, engrossed in fear and hesitation, never taking action, never defining himself… as a man.

What is the result of a man not defining the masculine terms of his life?  In not defining what a man and to be masculine is?  Death to a nation and its people.  A more CLEAR warning to the death of man and masculinity could not be written, and in such fine style!  Fortinbras storms the palace of Denmark to find no man standing to resist his claim to the throne.  Hamlet did what he could, he tried his best, but like today, he was surrounded by men in abject deficiency of any masculine character or temperament; except of course for Horatio, a man’s man and a good friend if ever one should be lucky enough to have one such as he.  Horatio of course is the only man left standing to tell the tale, a warning to all men of the dangers of not defining who and what they stand for as men.

I hope this article will be the Horatio needed for the MRM.

Discussion of leadership and masculinity, what it means to be a man, what it means to be masculine, is far from useless, divisive, or suspect of motive.

It goes to the very heart of defeating feminism.

What is the saying?  If you stand for nothing, you fall for anything?

Men are falling in droves in the 21st century.  When are we going to man up, and stand up, for something again?

In Shakespeare’s day, there was no question man had a role distinctly separate from, dare I say above and in front of, that of woman.  A role that he and he alone could fulfill for the future good of society.  Are we lesser men than our forefathers in backing away from taking up this mantle of leadership?  For the good of the family?  The nation?

Feminism came along to question man’s “natural” role as leader and I think this is simply God/Allah/Fate/Karma’s way of bringing about the next evolutionary stage of man – painful, but necessary.  Now that it has and man’s role has been removed from society, we can see the destruction wrought upon society our forefathers and Shakespeare warned about for millennia.  Now is the time to look back to those old patriarchal values, pick what is true and useful, tweak them in the light of 21st century knowledge, and discard the rest.  It will also be the last time women will have their say as “leaders” for… with all the evidence the MRM community is gathering for historical posterity during this process of regeneration of the next patriarchal age… the argument for man’s natural role as leader of the home and state will be beyond refutation – no man will be so stupid as to say “yes dear, whatever makes you happy dear” ever again.

Once men define for themselves in the 21st century what men and masculinity mean for them, women will naturally fall into line.  Peace will return to the state.  Love will return to relationships.  And sons like Hamlet won’t have to agonize over avenging the murder of their father by feminism.  I predict that in 50 years… even women will roll their eyes in shame at how their mothers and grandmothers treated the men in their lives.  The lesson will have been learned and both genders will emerge in a more balanced, not equal, relationship with one another

The future of men and masculinity, if history is any lesson, will look much like the days of old.  Man, nature and God/Allah has not fundamentally changed one iota over millennia and never will.  Man has allowed himself to be led astray by the very creature he covets most and was warned about in a past patriarchal and masculine age at great length, in great artistry and with great prose – woman.

Taking ownership of your life is more than simply going your own way from women, finding your career and establishing for yourself the life you want to live apart from women.  All of these are what men used to do in order to become men, but they also returned to woman and society and became leaders.  They wrote, debated and discussed… never concluding, always questioning…

“What is a man, if his chief good and market of his time be but to sleep and feed?  A beast, no more.  Sure He that made us with such large discourse, looking before and after, gave us not that capability and God like reason to fust in us unused.”

- Hamlet Act IV, Scene IV, 2nd quatrain

3) Don’t marry, don’t get her pregnant.

For now, this is the only course of action.  Long term?  Not to good for the human race.

At the risk of derailing this piece into a political dark hole… and who would have thought how topical this piece would be today considering who I am about to quote when I wrote it almost four months ago… this is precisely why Islam is going to defeat the west in the Middle East and at home.  France and all of Europe will be Muslim in mere decades.  America is well on its way.

The Effects Of Western Feminism – An Islamic Perspective

Dr. Ayub begins with a quote from Muammar Gaddafi.

“There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without sword, without gun, without conquest. We don’t need terrorists, we don’t need homicide bombers. The 50 plus million Muslims (in Europe) will turn it into the Muslim Continent within a few decades.”

The future belongs to those that show up.

Who shows up for the future?

Those who marry and form long term pair bonds to produce enough offspring to actually continue a culture into the future.

Ragnar September 27, 2010 at 11:12

In order for leadership to emerge there need to be a group of men who has something they believe is worth defending.  Darwin want us to fight for our own and Newton screw up any group lacking of dynamics.

Ragnar is right. Men do need something they believe is worth defending.

That belief is marriage and family. It always has and always will be.

Feminism destroyed marriage and family in the Christian west (Jewish as well, but to a lesser extent I think)… and it is now trying to destroy it in the Islamic east, the very last, and strongest, defense of what brought man out of the caves and into the civilized world – the reigning in of the chaos of matriarchal, female led “goddess” societies by male led, monogamous and long-term (ideally of course) marriage and family male/female patriarchal partnerships.

That statement flies in the face of everything the MRM supposedly stands for – no to marriage – and it is for that very reason it is most likely the sole reason any of us became MRM advocates in the first place – families destroyed by divorce, children ripped away from loving fathers. The result?  Rapidly increasing child delinquency and single mothers and childless “career” women being the most depressed human beings on the planet.

If men agree that we need to unite to defeat feminism, they are also simultaneously agreeing to defend the institution of marriage and family, for that is precisely what feminism was born to destroy in the first place. Therefore, the destruction of feminism is the rise and reinstatement of the institution of patriarchal marriage and family (albeit not in the same way as it was in the 1950s, obviously) as the primary locus and focus of societal organization.

If the 20th century was the rise of feminism and the end of family and man… the 21st century is going to be the rise of patriarchy and the return of family and man as it’s natural head… permanently.

A good man wants a good wife and mother to his children.  No good man will deny wanting this for himself.

Far from not marrying women or having children, men need to re-think how they can go about finding good women to marry.  To find a good mother to raise their sons and daughters.  There are no such women?  Far from it.  They can be trained and women are already beginning to take notice of the cues men are leaving as to their future marital relations with the relationship/marriage/baby strike.  All that is lacking in this strike is for men to come out and state up front and unequivocally:

• I want a family.
• I want a mother at home until the youngest is in school.
• I want a woman that will make our home a place of peace, love, caring, comfort and solitude from the outside world for her husband and children.
• I want a woman who will take a leave of absence from her “career” when it comes time to start a family who then trusts her husband to be HER SOLE PROVIDER. (because her “career” was, and always will be, second to being a wife and mother)
• I want a woman that will live on less, a lot less, than the materialist culture the new-world-order elite programs the rest of the deluded masses of sheeple (cough, women, cough) to pursue into debt to their financial suicide.
• I want a woman that can cook, that can sew, that can clean and takes pride in having a well kept home and lives frugally in it because to be lavish is to teach children the wrong lessons about what makes for a happy life.

What have men got to lose?

What have YOU got to lose?

You are already disengaging from meeting and dating women, so speaking this way and alienating them will only help your disengagement from them even further! (Trust me, this is personal, direct experience talking. They will give you so much space you will think you are in another universe.  Then… you will also start getting a LOT more looks than you used to before… and I mean the “bedroom eyes” kind of looks from women who are TOTAL strangers.  It is like they can SNIFF a masculine, dominant male by his very beliefs and thoughts alone!)

You are not going to marry any woman you do date – correction, “game” for sex or a “relationship.” – so again, what is the harm in telling her WHY you will not commit to her.

Why not date them and, when they ask, simply state up front what kind of woman you will marry or enter into a more committed relationship with than the free, prostitute-like-friends-with-benefits arrangement so many women are now willing to tolerate from men? (Yea… THAT’s advancement for the status of women?)

What have men got to lose?

If a woman should object to such a “misogynistic” tirade and ask how you can even begin to utter such barbaric, oppressive and patriarchal falsehoods and non-sense… you can say…

“Wow.  We must not be compatible at all.  You are really offended.  It’s a good thing we live in an age of EQUALITY and you are FREE to ACCEPT OR REJECT my proposal to enter into a relationship with me.  I wish you the best and hope you find a man that will not demand such degrading and submissive requests of you as being a loyal, devoted, loving and caring wife and mother to my children and myself.”

And WALK AWAY.

Women will get the message, but quick, or at least the smart ones will.  The dumb ones we don’t want so doing this will weed them out faster than Game ever could.  In fact. despite how much Game proponents love to think they have found the key to woman and therefore escaped the pitfalls of the feminist culture we live in if they decide to chance marriage, they have not.  Game only encourages more bad female behavior and the chance of getting stung as it seems the dangers to men in relationships with women are only going to keep getting worse.

Far from just a marriage strike or not having children, men need to tell women exactly what will work for them to even consider marriage or getting her pregnant.  Simply removing a wedding proposal and children from a woman’s future is not enough.  She won’t get it.  Women need to be taught what they, and society, require for there proper functioning.  In time, merging the marriage/baby strike with the above open and blunt non-negotiable requests going public in the mainstream will bring women around.  Technically, we don’t really need a men’s movement as the power of even just a few single men doing this is already becoming apparent.  With each man that goes his own way, woman, being the innately social and sexual union seeking creature she is, will begin to notice and immediately change tactics to get men to come back to her.  The only power a woman has over a man is that which he gives her.  When push comes to shove, it is woman, not man, that will be the first to change when love and intimacy is withdrawn, for she needs it more… far more… than man does to be truly happy.

Marriage and family are what most good men desire, on some level, as do most good women even if they are deluded by the feminist kool-aid at present.  These are the values men will die for, have died for, and will die for in the future.  As Darwin correctly discovered, men will fight for their own – their own family and the natural Newtonian group dynamics of balance, harmony and co-operation that emerge from a well ordered, male led household and state.

For those men that are not inclined to family and children, they too would benefit with being up front about their expectations of women. Unlike in the past, men and women are no longer held to only marriage and family as their future (they never were, but there was far more social pressure to do so in the past, where it should be left).  Women are now as educated as we are and many of them have absolutely no desire for children, so why not weed out the ones that want them and find that hottie that wants nothing but lots of sex and independence, just like you!  A man loses nothing in stating up front he does not want a family or marriage or children.  The only problem is, for this attitude to become the norm, we have what we have now in the west – a rapidly declining birth rate and a “culture” that will go extinct, replaced by one that does reproduce.

Beltain

… enough men need to get fed up to the point that they are no longer afraid to use the real male power [of effecting governmental change.]  When/if that critical mass is reached we will then see real leaders arise. It’s simple really men and women are different so why does the MRM in general expect to use the female avenue to change and constantly ignore the tried and tested male method?

The tried and tested male method is quite simple – state your demands and get compliance.  If you do not, move on to a female that will comply.  No coersion or force is necessary.  You simply give a woman a choice, and she can make up her own damn mind as to what is good for her or not.  YOU know what is good for YOU, and if she is smart, she will know that what is good for you is also good for HER and trust and follow you.

This is NOT rocket science.

Unless you have an infinite fear of rejection and place ALL your happiness and male self-esteem/confidence on having a woman in your life or “getting laid” to feel like you are a “man”… this aspect of the action phase of the emerging mainstream MRM movement will be a cakewalk.  I seriously doubt, if you are reading this here at In Mala Fide… you are as desperate as the man I just described in being unable to tell a woman what you want and walk away if you don’t get it.  We men in the MRM are already completely disengaged and indifferent to women, we just need to accept this fact and broadcast it loud and as far as the female ear can hear.

Men are not women…. so why are we acting like them?

Let’s stop complaining about feminism and the culture of annihilation it has created and do something about it.

I want you to get fed up.

Demand a family, if that is what you want, and a wife at home where you both work in co-operation, love and respect as partners to raise children in a loving and happy environment.  Governmental change is not necessary.  The government will change when the men in society change, as it always has and always will.

This is not simplistic… it is simply effective.  It is male.  It is masculine.  It will work.

But perhaps you are all right.  Perhaps Maximus is wrong about leadership, the discussion of being a man and of being more masculine, the dangers of stating your opinions on women, love, family and children boldly and with no guilt, on demanding women be good wives and mothers in order to get a marriage proposal (or even just a date).  Perhaps these things are too controversial to speak out about.

That I leave up to you to decide for yourself.

Lead women back to love.

Lead your life not in fear from reprisal for standing outside the accepted norms of society.

Lead your sons to become the future leaders of men.

Lead your daughters most especially to go out and marry such men. (As they will if you are that kind of father.)

Lead.

Man up.

What are you afraid of?