<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ingress Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ingressguide.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ingressguide.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Page Updated &#8211; Creating a Portal in Ingress</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/16/page-updated-creating-a-portal-in-ingress/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/16/page-updated-creating-a-portal-in-ingress/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creating a Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portal Submission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it has been a long time since some of these pages have been updated we have begun going through and updating the pages on our site with more up to date and accurate information.  The first page we updated was the page on Creating a Portal in Ingress. Here are a list of the <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/16/page-updated-creating-a-portal-in-ingress/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/16/page-updated-creating-a-portal-in-ingress/">Page Updated &#8211; Creating a Portal in Ingress</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/16/page-updated-creating-a-portal-in-ingress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Poll &#8211; What Was Your Favorite Part of Ingress Last Year?</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/04/new-poll-what-was-your-favorite-part-of-ingress-last-year/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/04/new-poll-what-was-your-favorite-part-of-ingress-last-year/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favorite Part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>So as promised here is the new poll to replace the poll from last year.  Keeping with the same subject matter we want to now know what was your favorite part of Ingress from playing last year? Was it attending anomalies, following the storyline, attending local events, the local community or just playing the game? <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/04/new-poll-what-was-your-favorite-part-of-ingress-last-year/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/04/new-poll-what-was-your-favorite-part-of-ingress-last-year/">New Poll &#8211; What Was Your Favorite Part of Ingress Last Year?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/04/new-poll-what-was-your-favorite-part-of-ingress-last-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Results &#8211; What do you Most Want to See in Ingress?</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/02/poll-results-what-do-you-most-want-to-see-in-ingress/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/02/poll-results-what-do-you-most-want-to-see-in-ingress/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Wanted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Gameplay Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For the majority of the year, due to not having the poll updated we’ve been running the same poll.  That poll asks one simple question, what did you most want to see added to Ingress? Well here are the results: As you can see 1/3rd of the votes (238 of 740 total) went towards “New <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/02/poll-results-what-do-you-most-want-to-see-in-ingress/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/02/poll-results-what-do-you-most-want-to-see-in-ingress/">Poll Results &#8211; What do you Most Want to See in Ingress?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/02/02/poll-results-what-do-you-most-want-to-see-in-ingress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Story line &#8211; Year in Review (2015)</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/30/ingress-story-line-year-in-review-2015/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/30/ingress-story-line-year-in-review-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year In Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you follow along with the Ingress story line last year?  If not then Niantic has you covered with a nice 10 minute recap of what happened in Ingress in 2015.   Did you make it into the video from one of the anomalies that happened this year? Did you keep up with the story <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/30/ingress-story-line-year-in-review-2015/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/30/ingress-story-line-year-in-review-2015/">Ingress Story line &#8211; Year in Review (2015)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/30/ingress-story-line-year-in-review-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Coming in 2016 For Ingress Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/14/whats-coming-in-2016-for-ingress-guide/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/14/whats-coming-in-2016-for-ingress-guide/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>First off, it’s been a long time since the last post was made on here, so It’s time to break the radio silence and give you all a quick look at what we have in store for Ingress Guide in 2016!   The first change we want to bring attention to is a change that <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/14/whats-coming-in-2016-for-ingress-guide/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/14/whats-coming-in-2016-for-ingress-guide/">What&#8217;s Coming in 2016 For Ingress Guide</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2016/01/14/whats-coming-in-2016-for-ingress-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Report 54 In Review</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/17/ingress-report-54-review-new-levels/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/17/ingress-report-54-review-new-levels/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interitus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Levels]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>First Interitus results are in as well as a nice teaser towards upcoming updates to the Ingress Scanner app including new levels. Scanner Updates The first big news from today&#8217;s Ingress Report is the announcement of levels 9 through 16.  Although there is no solid data on amounts of AP/Badges that are required in order <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/17/ingress-report-54-review-new-levels/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/17/ingress-report-54-review-new-levels/">Ingress Report 54 In Review</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/17/ingress-report-54-review-new-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Report 52 and The End of the Recursion Anomalies</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/03/ingress-report-52-end-recursion-anomalies/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/03/ingress-report-52-end-recursion-anomalies/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anomaly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artifacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recursion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Recursion anomaly wrapped up this last weekend in Los Angeles and the results of the overall anomaly are in. The final anomaly in the Recursion Anomaly went to the Enlightened, with a final score of 577 for the Resistance and 780 for the Enlightened.  Enlightened agents claimed the primary location for the anomaly for <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/03/ingress-report-52-end-recursion-anomalies/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/03/ingress-report-52-end-recursion-anomalies/">Ingress Report 52 and The End of the Recursion Anomalies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/04/03/ingress-report-52-end-recursion-anomalies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Report 49 In Review</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/13/ingress-report-49-review/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/13/ingress-report-49-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recursion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XM Vault]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Ingress Report yet again focuses almost solely on the Recursion anomaly and the results of this weekend&#8217;s event. )  Recursion Anomaly Update This last weekend&#8217;s anomaly in Austin, TX again went to the Resistance.  While the Enlightened controlled most of the area around Austin the Resistance controlled the global MU count as well as the <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/13/ingress-report-49-review/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/13/ingress-report-49-review/">Ingress Report 49 In Review</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/13/ingress-report-49-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Report 48 In Review</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/07/ingress-report-48-review/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/07/ingress-report-48-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elive V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recursion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Ingress Report again focuses on the Recursion Anomaly with some information on new scanner updates. Recursion Anomaly Update Resistance are proving themselves to be more coordinated this anomaly event and have once again captured this week&#8217;s event in Nashville, TN, USA The final score was Enlightened: 222 / Resistance 671 Satellite locations are also proving <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/07/ingress-report-48-review/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/07/ingress-report-48-review/">Ingress Report 48 In Review</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/03/07/ingress-report-48-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Report 47 In Review</title>
		<link>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/02/27/ingress-report-47-review/</link>
					<comments>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/02/27/ingress-report-47-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingress Agent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ingress Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient Artifacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recursion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scanner Update]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingressguide.com/?p=651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Thursday again so time for another Ingress Report.  Today&#8217;s Ingress report focuses again on the Recursion anomalies and results from the last weekend&#8217;s anomaly event in Bangalore, India. The first thing talked about in this week&#8217;s update was the recent scanner updates which feature a new mini game of sorts to help boost your <a href='http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/02/27/ingress-report-47-review/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/02/27/ingress-report-47-review/">Ingress Report 47 In Review</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ingressguide.com">Ingress Guide</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ingressguide.com/2014/02/27/ingress-report-47-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
