<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>inside Sarbanes Oxley</title><link>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/</link><description>An ever expanding collection of Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX, SarbOx) related information, news, books, events, and jobs.</description><language>en</language><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Rick Turoczy)</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:11:29 PDT</lastBuildDate><generator>Blogger http://www.blogger.com</generator><openSearch:totalResults xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">2410</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/InsideSarbanesOxley" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>InsideSarbanesOxley</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>What Does Madoff's Auditor Say? No Answer</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/3YzXjOF0QHA/what-does-madoffs-auditor-say-no-answer.html</link><category>bankruptcy</category><category>Madoff</category><category>audit</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:32:42 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-342274433792258520</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>The tiny auditor of Bernard Madoff's Wall Street firm, at the center of an alleged $50-billion Ponzi scheme, is being investigated by the district attorney in a New York City suburb.

Friehling &amp;amp; Horowitz had signed off on the annual financial statement for Bernard L....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=2xz7RSeR"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=9HtbOVQ7"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/12/what-does-madoffs-auditor-say-no-answer.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Proposed "Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008"</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/541JUkh-Ezc/proposed-emergency-economic.html</link><category>Comptroller General</category><category>TARP</category><category>mark-to-market</category><category>FAS157</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:36:30 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-1842913722991927382</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Noteworthy language in the relief regarding market transparency, oversight and audit, and mark-to-market (MTM) FAS157 treatment:


Section 114. Market Transparency.
48-hour Reporting Requirement: The Secretary is required, within 2 business days of exercising authority...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=oCv2NlND"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=w0QdN2A6"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/09/proposed-emergency-economic.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Gartner Magic Quadrant - GRC</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/l5S6iD8Y_TM/gartner-magic-quadrant-grc.html</link><category>Gartner</category><category>MetricStream</category><category>grc</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:47:05 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-3457085095575071652</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Free report from Gartner on leading GRC applications, courtesy of MetricStream.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=5Pk1fGxh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=SEapt70w"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/08/gartner-magic-quadrant-grc.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Survey: Enterprise risk management still a blind spot for insurance CFOs</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/frGoF0HNNNI/survey-enterprise-risk-management-still.html</link><category>Towers Perrin survey</category><category>measuring risk</category><category>life insurance companies</category><category>ERM</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:53:10 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-2909185802818856722</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The drumbeat for the use of enterprise risk management processes at major companies is getting louder thanks to the credit crisis.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said yesterdayThursday that the credit crisis has exposed weaknesses in many financial firms’...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=6kAbDN6n"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=T21Xpaii"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/05/survey-enterprise-risk-management-still.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Large-caps set high corporate governance standards, but independence still an issue for some</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/6CtQQZxrWpM/large-caps-set-high-corporate.html</link><category>Austrailia</category><category>BDO Kendalls Large-Cap Corporate Governance Survey</category><category>corporate governance</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:58:13 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-8980139241749745071</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>For those that have felt the corporate governance requirements under SOX were unreasonable, consider these findings in Austrailia regarding corporate governance practices. The themes sound all too familiar.


Australia’s largest publicly listed companies generally meet all...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=IKg3ODO2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=S31ONX7f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/05/large-caps-set-high-corporate.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Lawsuits may expand Sarbanes-Oxley</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/W8ihWEgEfic/lawsuits-may-expand-sarbanes-oxley.html</link><category>whistleblower</category><category>employee lawsuit</category><category>Fidelity Investments</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:51:23 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-1702222964711829160</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Two lawsuits filed by former employees against Fidelity Investments may resolve a simmering dispute in the securities industry: Whether mutual fund employees are protected by a whistle-blower law adopted in the wake of corporate accounting scandals.The Sarbanes-Oxley Act...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=FE10DVV5"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=1qqysqf4"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/05/lawsuits-may-expand-sarbanes-oxley.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Harsh internal IMF audit calls for 'major changes'</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/u6_XSA6n1Pk/harsh-internal-imf-audit-calls-for.html</link><category>IMF</category><category>internal audit</category><category>governance</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:43:09 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-2904731777028315301</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Internal auditors at the International Monetary Fund released a harshly critical report on governance Wednesday and urged "major changes" to maintain the embattled institution's relevance.
The Independent Evaluation Office of the IMF said that effectiveness had been the...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=qoLs3sQ3"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=5sSeJpKY"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/05/harsh-internal-imf-audit-calls-for.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Board Adopts New Ethics and Independence Rule Concerning Communications with Audit Committees and an Amendment to its Existing Tax Services Rule</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/50p2PjwYXSg/board-adopts-new-ethics-and.html</link><category>tsx services rule</category><category>pcaob</category><category>code of ethics</category><category>audit committee</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:34:38 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-8259979023033033595</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The Board adopted Rule 3526 to enhance communication between audit committees and registered firms regarding the firm's independence. Rule 3526 will require a registered public accounting firm, before accepting an initial engagement pursuant to the standards of the PCAOB,...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=uFSoBS3r"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=74VdmIXv"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/board-adopts-new-ethics-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Crunching the Words</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/e9HCruJPMlo/crunching-words.html</link><category>MD and A disclosure</category><category>fraud</category><category>audit</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:28:01 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-6526888457787970219</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>When auditors seek evidence of fraud, they take a careful look at a company's financial statements. Maybe they should examine other statements, such as those uttered by company executives.

That's the theory behind new fraud-detection software developed by two professors at...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=cMhCF7w0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=dahdj8e7"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/crunching-words.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SOX Life Blog: Knowledge Management and Corporate Governance</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/ZJ395v6NwGc/sox-life-blog-knowledge-management-and.html</link><category>change management</category><category>corporate governance</category><category>knowledge management</category><category>baby boomer</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:03:18 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-8620741372701098855</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>Knowledge Management (KM) is more than a buzz phrase running through organizations, so if you were hoping this discussion was going to abruptly end, think again.
With so many organizations facing labor shortages as the baby boomers look toward retirement, it becomes not...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=bcDNSv9A"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=OhbAguDH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/sox-life-blog-knowledge-management-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SOX Life Blog: Reader Question - Understanding &amp; Evaluating Segregation of Duties</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/-naBZEbsn5o/sox-life-blog-reader-question.html</link><category>access management</category><category>segregation of duties</category><category>seperation of duties</category><category>coso</category><category>fraud</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:12:37 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-5023375417574485313</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><description>I appreciate when readers share their challenges in applying issues and concepts, as invariably there are an additional dozen people also struggling with this same topic.

One professional writes:
I am new at this and need to understand about SOX and SOD, do you have any...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=s9ckjK7s"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=LiEamwHa"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/sox-life-blog-reader-question.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>PCAOB Considers Adopting New Ethics and Independence Rule Concerning Communications with Audit Committees and Amending its Existing Tax Services Rule</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/OaBjajZljIY/board-to-consider-adopting-new-ethics.html</link><category>tax services</category><category>independence</category><category>pcaob</category><category>rule 3526</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:31:28 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-5381522332258328493</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has scheduled an open meeting for Tuesday, April 22, at 9:30 a.m. in the Board's open meeting room at 1666 K St. NW, Washington, DC.

The Board will consider adopting Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=YajWp1xK"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=5QPGgBFb"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/board-to-consider-adopting-new-ethics.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Segregation of Duties Whitepaper: Minimizing the Cost and Complexity of Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/NlZrWdT05ws/segregation-of-duties-whitepaper.html</link><category>segregation of duties</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:50:01 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-8410372891028171528</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Another resource available for those seeking to better understand and manage their SOD risks and issues.

Corporate and IT executives continue to feel the pressures of assuring
federal regulators, auditors, boards of directors, and stockholders that
corporate financial...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=TdjqA9Cx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=Fpj766MW"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/segregation-of-duties-whitepaper.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Changing Ethics Compliance Rules And Their Potential Impact On Government Contractors And Investors</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/NqqtbVqsr30/changing-ethics-compliance-rules-and.html</link><category>ethics</category><category>CBE</category><category>fraud</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:45:57 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-512500821029232392</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Recently, the US Government implemented a new rule and proposed yet more rules regarding ethics and corporate compliance programs for government contractors. This marks a continuing shift towards adopting a more aggressive approach in addressing government contractor fraud,...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=5D7HO0yi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=ycUpSFkG"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/changing-ethics-compliance-rules-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Cox Seeks $1B Boost from Congress</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/MtaK6VuEIQg/cox-seeks-1b-boost-from-congress.html</link><category>Christopher Cox</category><category>sec</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:39:53 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-6455910258119869995</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Christopher Cox asked Congress to approve his nearly $1 billion budget request for fiscal year 2009.

If lawmakers agree the SEC needs its first budget increase in three years, the commission will have realized a roughly 4 percent...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=oLle156B"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=xRozHObO"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/cox-seeks-1b-boost-from-congress.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Changing Atmospherics of Corporate Crime Sentencing in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Act Era</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/UD_kZEo7Uw0/changing-atmospherics-of-corporate.html</link><category>penalties</category><category>white-collar crime</category><category>corporate scandal</category><category>fraud</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:43:34 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-9118531811561009281</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been viewed as a watershed event in dealing with corporate fraud. In addition to its extensive provisions dealing with internal controls and corporate accounting procedures, the law adopted new crimes and pushed the United States...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=wf9VYEfJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=SS4rElip"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/changing-atmospherics-of-corporate.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SOX Life Blog: Flagging the "SEC's SOX for Small Business Reference"</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/7PYJzJtUBo8/sox-life-blog-flagging-secs-sox-for.html</link><category>SOX Life Blog</category><category>reference</category><category>small business</category><category>coso</category><category>sec</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:38:46 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-7296418405829531226</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Dreading your pending SOX initiative? Or the thoughts of IPO? Or how you might refine your implementation?

Hopefully, "Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404A Guide for Small Business" from the SEC takes some of the sting out of it. This incorporates much of the thinking and...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=gCeEk3FF"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=mO0r5QvZ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/sox-life-blog-flagging-secs-sox-for.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How Long Should It Take to Restate?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/cvDkSkrPlr4/how-long-should-it-take-to-restate.html</link><category>restatement</category><category>8-k</category><category>CIFR</category><category>sec</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:13:06 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-3104622168767178301</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Sometimes after announcing they need to restate their financials, companies go into shutdown mode. For up to two years, investors won't see a regulatory filing or hear a significant financial peep while a company tidies up its past.

The Securities and Exchange Commission's...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=0ABICvB6"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=4Pq5n3J1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/how-long-should-it-take-to-restate.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>US company restatements soared 1997 to 2006--study</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/F3fBVQJJpc0/us-company-restatements-soared-1997-to.html</link><category>Susan Scholz</category><category>restatement studies</category><category>sox</category><category>US Treasury</category><category>fraud</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:32:43 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-1461050796981452223</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The frequency of financial restatements by U.S. public companies began to increase before the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate reform law was passed in 2002, according to a study commissioned by the U.S. Treasury Department and released on Wednesday.

But restatements associated...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=wBUdDjs2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=QW5RUwbY"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/us-company-restatements-soared-1997-to.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Blame for restatements may need a rethinking</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/NtKxlDukcgI/blame-for-restatements-may-need.html</link><category>Audit Analytics</category><category>management judgement</category><category>SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission)</category><category>restatement studies</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:09 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-154725464812395480</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The growing number of companies restating their financial results has been cited as a reason to ease U.S. accounting standards by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Treasury Department. But the restatement problem may not be the big bad wolf it was originally...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=CPAelQ6H"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=cDuxbtYZ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/blame-for-restatements-may-need.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>In Justice Shift, Corporate Deals Replace Trials</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/zRd-j5JW7_k/in-justice-shift-corporate-deals.html</link><category>outside monitor</category><category>deferred prosecution agreement</category><category>prosecution</category><category>criminal charges</category><category>fraud</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:59:31 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-25539714858154101</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>In 2005, federal authorities concluded that a Monsanto consultant had visited the home of an Indonesian official and, with the approval of a senior company executive, handed over an envelope stuffed with hundred-dollar bills. The money was meant as a bribe to win looser...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=RMrPtSd4"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=d73sf3lm"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/in-justice-shift-corporate-deals.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Standard and Poor's - Use of ERM in Credit Rating</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/_6TC9bqLiLc/standard-and-poors-use-of-erm-in-credit.html</link><category>credit rating</category><category>Standard and Poors</category><category>enterprise risk management</category><category>ERM</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:45:50 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-3452107207265106490</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Maybe so much of the Sarbanes Oxley legistlation has been to simply bring US filers up to par with governance and risk management practices that have been maturing around the globe.

Standard and Poor's, one of the leading credit rating agencies for capital markets, has...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=zI1bGuQN"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=crBYPvfL"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/standard-and-poors-use-of-erm-in-credit.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>It's time to embrace Risk Management</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/OkdYsKQ8yNA/its-time-to-embrace-risk-management.html</link><category>credit rating</category><category>Standard and Poors</category><category>enterprise risk management</category><category>ERM</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:26:41 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-8192413163059002024</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Since the advent of Sarbanes-Oxley, non-financial corporations have faced increasingly strong regulatory and compliance requirements aimed broadly at increasing transparency in their business practices. Risk management has been addressed at times, but usually as an...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=3en00s3h"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=xALFGMgd"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/its-time-to-embrace-risk-management.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>PCAOB Addresses Emerging Audit Issues In 2008 Forums on Auditing in the Small Business Environment</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/gn953cQss_o/pcaob-addresses-emerging-audit-issues.html</link><category>forums</category><category>pcaob</category><category>small business</category><category>as5</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:15:34 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-4944552857820463248</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board today announced the 2008 series of its Forums on Auditing in the Small Business Environment. These forums are designed to help share important information with registered public accounting firms and public companies operating in...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=tS56SPGi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=aHFm4I4R"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/04/pcaob-addresses-emerging-audit-issues.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Proposed Restatement Guidelines Draw Investor Alarm</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InsideSarbanesOxley/~3/SS_aVzMCy6c/proposed-restatement-guidelines-draw.html</link><category>restatement</category><category>SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission)</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Toby Lucich)</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:45:32 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8053943.post-529923673619322308</guid><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>Investor advocates are wary of a regulatory proposal that could decrease the number of times companies restate their financial results.

Barbara Roper, director of investor protection for the Consumer Federation of America, contends that the suggested changes to the...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=4TH1jswr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?a=BLRPkmjy"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/InsideSarbanesOxley?d=50" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.insidesarbanesoxley.com/2008/03/proposed-restatement-guidelines-draw.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
