<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:posterous="http://posterous.com/help/rss/1.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MixRank Blog</title>
    <link>http://blog.mixrank.com</link>
    <description>Strategies for rapidly acquiring and monetizing lots of traffic.</description>
    <generator>posterous.com</generator>
    <link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="http://posterous.com/api/sup_update#2a5df0e57" type="application/json" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" />
    
    
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Insightio" /><feedburner:info uri="insightio" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://posterous.superfeedr.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>Insightio</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:26:08 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>Cut Your Costs 90% by Scaling Laterally Across Audiences</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/cLOcNJRYcbg/revitalize-dying-campaigns-by-scaling-lateral</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/revitalize-dying-campaigns-by-scaling-lateral</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Say you have a campaign that's been moderately successful for some time. Your creatives and targeting are relevant to your audience, and you're getting a steady flow of conversions profitably. But, after some time, your campaign will invariably being to saturate the market. You'll see conversion rates begin to drop and costs slowly rise, while traffic remains flat. This happens to everyone. Online marketing wouldn't be much fun if we could just throw up a single successful campaign and sit on our asses collecting checks for the rest of our dats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do you scale the campaign up to more traffic and stop the regression to lower profits?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One way might be to expand your ad groups or targeting and find more keywords that will do as well as your existing ad groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finding lateral keywords(keywords that describe the same term in a different way) &amp;nbsp;has been a well documented and successful strategy, especially in the early days of search marketing, when a marketer armed with a thesaurus and a good imagination could build massive campaigns.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But adding more keywords to a campaign is merely a band-aid, a short term fix that won't solve the core problem of an audience that has gotten tired of what you're selling.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'd like to describe a new strategy that I have used very successfully to grow new campaigns as well as breathe new life into stagnant old ones. I call this strategy scaling to &lt;strong&gt;lateral audiences&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just as lateral keywords are closely semantically related to the original keyword (i.e "meet single women" and "online dating sites"), lateral audiences are closely related based on their core attributes- their fundamental needs, desires, and problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In other words, if your product solves a problem for a specific group of people, thinking in terms of laterally related audiences would help you find more people like them, that also have a need for your product.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To illustrate the power of lateral audiences, we're going to walk through an example using a &lt;a href="https://mixrank.com/register" target="_blank"&gt;free MixRank account&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just to take a random example I made up, let's pretend we're a company selling gold coins- a growing industry in this economy. This is a very competitive space with lots of advertisers, so we're going to have to get creative if we want to take some of their traffic for ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google's &lt;a href="https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__c=1000000000&amp;amp;__u=1000000000&amp;amp;__o=kt&amp;amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_STATS" target="_blank"&gt;Traffic Estimator&lt;/a&gt; shows that the keyword "buy gold coins" has a very high average CPC for position 1 of $10.10. To get this data, I set the average CPC in the Traffic Estimator to an absurdly high number like $1000 to make sure I get the absolute highest bid for this keyword.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's find a way to get a similar audience, one who's interested in buying gold, less expensively. All we have to do to start is initiate a search from the &lt;a href="http://mixrank.com" target="_blank"&gt;MixRank home page&lt;/a&gt; and find a relevant advertiser whose strategies we can study. Let's just search for our keyword and click on the first suggestion:&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;a href="http://getfile6.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/FomiDHhDJwhyslGxIjHGwyFbJDpmEazvJdhbuFkChmgGqqgsJxCxzmAtlHqv/lateral-1.jpg.scaled1000.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="Lateral-1" height="267" src="http://getfile9.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/FomiDHhDJwhyslGxIjHGwyFbJDpmEazvJdhbuFkChmgGqqgsJxCxzmAtlHqv/lateral-1.jpg.scaled500.jpg" width="500" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The search results will show us a few ads that are highly relevant to the keyword we searched for. I can already see one lateral audience here- several of the ads say "Buy silver coins".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's important to be mindful of the distinction between keywords and audiences here. &lt;strong&gt;Lateral keywords &lt;/strong&gt;for this theme would be phrases like "buy gold bullion" or "buy gold bars". In other words, they describe the same product in a different way. "Buy silver coins" describes a &lt;em&gt;different product &lt;/em&gt;but targets a &lt;strong&gt;lateral audience&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;that has similar fundamental desires- in this case the desire to own precious metal. This desire could further be reduced to a core drive for security, financial stability, greed, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The keyword "buy silver coins" has an average CPC of $4.92. Still high, but a significant improvement in targeting the same audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's find out which core desire it is based on the current advertising strategies of the market's leaders. From the search results page, I'm going to pick what looks to be the current leader in this space, "goldine.com". I can see more data about them by clicking on that domain in the "Advertiser" column on the far right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Advertiser Report for goldine.com will show me their highest performing ads and traffic sources. You can also reach this report simply by typing their domain, "goldline.com" into any search box.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking through their text ads, I'm noticing a common phrase that's consistent across all of their split tests: "Free Investor Kit":&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;a href="http://getfile8.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/qhwpodHIoHtJFavBpcFlJbyolyFuneApmBldlvxvvDclAnIzepruflDbcssl/lateral-2.jpg.jpg.scaled1000.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="Lateral-2" height="266" src="http://getfile4.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/qhwpodHIoHtJFavBpcFlJbyolyFuneApmBldlvxvvDclAnIzepruflDbcssl/lateral-2.jpg.jpg.scaled500.jpg" width="500" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They've probably tested many different positioning strategies and found that presenting gold as an investment is the strongest appeal. Here's another lateral niche audience: people who are looking to buy gold as an investment (as opposed to collectors seeking gold for numismatic purposes, etc). Google Traffic Estimator shows that the keyword "invest in gold" has a max CPC of $8.87. This high number is encouraging, because it means that this is a valuable, high converting audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$8.87 is a bit rich for us- if we were running a campaign targeting this theme, I would probably see my margins plummet as I get squeezed out by competitors with bigger budgets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But remember our other, related audience of silver buyers? "buy silver coins" was significantly cheaper than "buy gold coins", so I would expect this pattern to hold across other, related keywords centered around buying silver.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indeed, "invest in silver" has a maximum CPC of $3.71, which is a huge 58% discount from the gold keyword, yet targeting an audience that's closely related to the original keyword, and one we can be reasonably sure will convert just as well, because they're interested in buying precious metals as an investment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But let's keep going and see if we can cut our traffic costs even further using MixRank's database of millions of ads.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mixrank.com/search"&gt;MixRank's ad search&lt;/a&gt; uses sophisticated matching algorithms that go beyond simply looking for the appearance of keywords in ad copy or landing pages and identifies campaigns that are thematically relevant to the query. For a great example of this, let's search for our new keyword that we derived from the ad copy we saw goldline.com running- "investing in gold".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our goal with these searches is to identify keywords and audiences that don't match our search query exactly, but are somehow related.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There's one result that jumps out at me immediately.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;a href="http://getfile2.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/mhEEhIvkiIywibqHpqAsdtdnyswqqEiFDqhygpgJiDCegCaJDpudgmdtxebE/lateral-4.jpg.jpg.scaled1000.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="Lateral-4" height="244" src="http://getfile0.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/mhEEhIvkiIywibqHpqAsdtdnyswqqEiFDqhygpgJiDCegCaJDpudgmdtxebE/lateral-4.jpg.jpg.scaled500.jpg" width="500" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course! Some people that are interested in investing in gold are part of the small, but lucrative niche audience of people stocking up for an impending economic collapse. The Ron Paul audience, if you will. Analyzing the ads of advertisers like this one will give us great insight into this market. Let's make the assumption that people anticipating an economic collapse are highly motivated to turn their paper dollars into gold, which we will be happy to sell to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The keyword "economic collapse", which features prominently in these ads, has a suggested max CPC of $1.02, a &lt;strong&gt;90% discount&lt;/strong&gt; on our original keyword of "buy gold coins", which cost over $10 a click.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An inexperienced marketer will suggest that "economic collapse" is a bad keyword to target, because it doesn't show intent and is not a "buying keyword", so it will not convert as well. But remember, we're getting this traffic 10 times cheaper!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's say you have a stagnant campaign based around the "buy gold coins" theme that's barely breaking even. If you target the "economic collapse" keyword, all you have to do is achieve &lt;strong&gt;1/10th your current conversion rate&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;from this audience to get a huge bump in traffic and profits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Prepare for impending economic collapse- buy gold!". The ads practically write themselves.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No thesaurus or keyword tool will tell us that new main keyword, "economic collapse", is strongly correlated with the keyword we started with, "buy gold coins". But by using MixRank to pull relevant keywords out of ad copy and searching for thematically relevant ads matching those new keywords, we can quickly identify pockets of opportunity that advertisers without the benefit of this data will miss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a later post, I'll show you how to delve even deeper to identify even less expensive, high converting audiences and leveraging them for a flood of massive traffic. But following the strategy outlined above should be enough to get you started scaling your campaigns across lateral audiences very quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/revitalize-dying-campaigns-by-scaling-lateral"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/revitalize-dying-campaigns-by-scaling-lateral#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/cLOcNJRYcbg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" height="405" width="759" url="http://getfile6.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/FomiDHhDJwhyslGxIjHGwyFbJDpmEazvJdhbuFkChmgGqqgsJxCxzmAtlHqv/lateral-1.jpg">
        <media:thumbnail height="267" width="500" url="http://getfile9.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/FomiDHhDJwhyslGxIjHGwyFbJDpmEazvJdhbuFkChmgGqqgsJxCxzmAtlHqv/lateral-1.jpg.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" height="426" width="802" url="http://getfile3.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/qhwpodHIoHtJFavBpcFlJbyolyFuneApmBldlvxvvDclAnIzepruflDbcssl/lateral-2.jpg.jpg">
        <media:thumbnail height="266" width="500" url="http://getfile4.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/qhwpodHIoHtJFavBpcFlJbyolyFuneApmBldlvxvvDclAnIzepruflDbcssl/lateral-2.jpg.jpg.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" height="470" width="964" url="http://getfile5.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/mhEEhIvkiIywibqHpqAsdtdnyswqqEiFDqhygpgJiDCegCaJDpudgmdtxebE/lateral-4.jpg.jpg">
        <media:thumbnail height="244" width="500" url="http://getfile0.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2012-02-13/mhEEhIvkiIywibqHpqAsdtdnyswqqEiFDqhygpgJiDCegCaJDpudgmdtxebE/lateral-4.jpg.jpg.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/revitalize-dying-campaigns-by-scaling-lateral</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>How to keep display ad A/B testing from blowing up in your face</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/s6svFgKYLLc/how-to-keep-display-ad-ab-testing-from-blowin</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-keep-display-ad-ab-testing-from-blowin</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This guest post is by Myles Younger, co-founder of &lt;a href="http://www.cannedbanners.com"&gt;Canned Banners&lt;/a&gt;. Canned Banners provides a platform and tools for automating and streamlining display ad design. Follow the company on Twitter at &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/cannedbanners"&gt;@cannedbanners&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Online advertisers, especially search marketers, understand the power of A/B testing. In search, the most successful advertisers will constantly A/B test hundreds of different ads. With the recent growth in display advertising, it's logical for online marketers to try and apply their A/B testing expertise to the  world of display.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, data-driven marketers should be careful before diving into display advertising. This post is going to explain some key differences between search ads and display ads, and offer some tips on how to keep your display ad design budget (and your sanity) under control when you're doing large-scale A/B tests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Notes: I'm not including Facebook ads when I say "display ads." That could be a whole other blog post, and I'm not really qualified to write it. Nor am I considering landing page optimization, which is a critical factor in ad testing, but I needed to keep my focus limited.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Search ads are simple. Display ads are complex.&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before we go further, it's important to appreciate just how much more &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;complex&lt;/span&gt; a display ad is versus a search ad. Here's some rough math to give you an idea of the difference in complexity:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.cannedbanners.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/permutation_graphic.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is complexity important? With search ads, your creative palette is constrained to one element: text. With display ads, you could potentially test an &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;infinite&lt;/span&gt; variety of elements: text, color, imagery, fonts, animation, button style, etc. So while it's almost impossible to create an "ugly" search ad,  it's very, very easy to make poor choices and create an ugly display ad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Tip #1 &amp;mdash; Start with good designs&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even though you might need to test potentially hundreds of different ad variations, don't cut corners and launch with garbage ad creative. Finding out that Crappy Display Ad A beat Crappy Display Ad B is like learning that horse manure smells slightly better than dog poop. Don't waste your money &amp;amp; time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think you can randomly test crappy designs and eventually iterate your way to a perfect, beautiful display ad, read the previous graphic again (and maybe study up on how exponents work); the universe won't be around long enough to perform all the necessary design iterations to hit paydirt. Launch with thoughtful, professional ad designs that you feel good about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This doesn't mean you need to spend weeks &amp;amp; weeks designing your first round of ads, but don't just throw some clipart and tacky text effects into a box and call it a display ad. In general, ugly ads won't perform very well and they'll make you and/or your client look bad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once you've got some solid starting designs, you can go nuts with rapid iteration and experimentation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if you don't know why the ad below on the left is godawful, read the next tip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.cannedbanners.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ad_design_comparison.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Tip #2 &amp;mdash; Hire a professional&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most people are horrible designers. If you're not confident in your design skills, hire someone to design a few templates that you can use. To get some good design ideas, browse around online and find well-designed display ads with layouts that could work well as templates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.cannedbanners.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/obligatory_mad_men_reference.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if you want a &lt;a href="http://www.cannedbanners.com"&gt;self-serve solution&lt;/a&gt;, that's what my company does (I'll leave it up to you to find our competitors and figure out why we're better).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Tip #3 &amp;mdash; Use stock photography&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At Canned Banners, we see hundreds of display ads designed by amateurs. What's the number one thing that ruins otherwise good ads? Bad frikkin' photography. &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Do not&lt;/span&gt; cut corners and make ads using blurry snapshots from your smartphone. Go to inexpensive stock photo websites like &lt;a href="http://istockphoto.com"&gt;istockphoto.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://thinkstock.com"&gt;thinkstock.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://shutterstock.com"&gt;shutterstock.com&lt;/a&gt; and buy high-quality photos taken by professional photographers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Extra Tip-within-a-Tip:&lt;/strong&gt; Most stock photo websites sell subscriptions. They can be pricey, but if you're doing high-volume A/B testing, a subscription or package deal is going to be much cheaper than buying images one at a time.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stock photo websites are also a quick source of design variations that you can test. Running a campaign for a real estate company? Use one ad template and buy 50 good real estate images (the nice house, the "for sale" sign, the happy homeowner couple, the happy agent, etc), throw them in your ads, and see which photos perform best.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.cannedbanners.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/photo_comparison.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;That's enough tips...for now&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I could keep going for several more pages, but if you've read this far, thanks! I hope these tips give you some food for thought. If you have any questions about display ad design, &lt;a href="http://www.cannedbanners.com/contact"&gt;email me here&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/cannedbanners"&gt;follow @cannedbanners on Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;br /&gt; Myles&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-keep-display-ad-ab-testing-from-blowin"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-keep-display-ad-ab-testing-from-blowin#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/s6svFgKYLLc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-keep-display-ad-ab-testing-from-blowin</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>You're Not Failing Enough</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/j_ud4ScgN1w/presentation-paid-traffic-for-lean-startups</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/presentation-paid-traffic-for-lean-startups</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I was asked to give a talk about paid traffic sources at 500 Startups last week. The presentation is embedded below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although I couldn't resist diving into deep, specific, tactical stuff near the end, the three most important points I wanted to impress upon my audience were:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Most online ad campaigns (even those created by professionals) fail&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The only foolproof way to succeed is to try (and fail) enough to exhaust every other option except the successful one&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Therefore, your objective should be to fail as quickly and cheaply as possible&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's become common knowledge among the lean startup movement that you should launch quickly, iterate, pivot, etc. But I want to take this one step further as applied to traffic (and startups as a whole):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When you launch a campaign, your objective should be to make it fail.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you launch an advertising experiment, it will most likely fail. The null hypothesis is that it fails. This is a good thing, because it creates defensible barriers to entry for your business.In other words, once you have a successful campaign, a novice with a $100 AdWords coupon won't be able to disrupt your acquisition channels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If chances are that your campaign fails, you might as well do it quickly and painlessly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know it seems crazy to set a goal of losing money. But just give it a try. Because here's what happens when a campaign fails:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The campaign failed because it spent money without bringing in enough conversions or revenue to pay for itself.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If the campaign is spending money, it's generating traffic.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If the campaign is generating traffic, it's also generating data: click costs, conversion rates, ad copy and landing page split test results, etc.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And as any good marketer will tell you, data is everything. He who has the most data wins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't aim for launching a campaign that's instantly successful/viral/profitable. That's a fool's errand, and it can only lead to disappointment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Your only objective with a new campaign should be to collect enough data to validate or disprove your assumptions.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then go back to the drawing board, use what you've learned to create a new campaign that fails slightly less than the last one, and try again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't worry about the conversion rate or CPC with a new campaign. Just get the data, so you have a baseline you can optimize from.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you get an additional data point about what works and what doesn't you win, no matter the result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pickup artists call this mindset &lt;strong&gt;outcome independence&lt;/strong&gt;, defined as "The mindset of not focusing on a specific result, or growing attached to any outcome."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you're not attached to the outcome of a split test, you'll never get demoralized by its inevitable failure. And you'll never risk giving up on a traffic source or acquisition strategy too quickly because your first few campaigns failed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be an incredibly powerful mindset. Embrace failure. Never stop testing. And the successes will come in time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The high rate of failure for most ad campaigns is the reason we started &lt;a href="http://mixrank.com"&gt;MixRank&lt;/a&gt;. We built our startup to catalog and analyze millions of split tests and campaigns &amp;nbsp;so you can learn from your competitors' mistakes rather than making them all over again.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;iframe scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/10206992?rel=0" frameborder="0" height="355" width="425"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't post that frequently, so your best bet to get notified about new posts like this one is to &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Insightio"&gt;subscribe by RSS&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/presentation-paid-traffic-for-lean-startups"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/presentation-paid-traffic-for-lean-startups#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/j_ud4ScgN1w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/presentation-paid-traffic-for-lean-startups</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>How to Hire a Great Marketer for Your Company </title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/-tsOK-LILmY/how-to-hire-a-great-marketer-for-your-company</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-hire-a-great-marketer-for-your-company</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;A lot of people have been asking me for help with hiring marketing people for their company. I keep repeating the same advice, so I thought I would lay it out here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;My usual disclaimer: This advice is mostly targeted towards startups and lead gen companies who are interested in significantly increasing their traffic and conversions. In other words, performance marketing. If you're more interested in branding or social media marketing (whatever that is), then this post probably isn't for you.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;There are five key questions you should ask yourself about any potential marketing hire. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Anyone with a good answer to all five is worth his weight in gold- hire him immediately. Hitting three or four of these points can make for a very good hire, as long as you have support staff in place and are willing to spend some time training and getting this person up to speed. And unless you already have a very strong marketing system in place and are bringing this person in at a junior level, I would be careful about expecting much out of someone possessing two or less of these qualities.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: medium;"&gt;Does he have a strong track record of driving traffic?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;This is probably the biggest predictor of success in internet marketing. If there's any way for you to snag someone with deep operational experience, who has the experience of getting his hands dirty and actually building effective campaigns from the ground up, do it. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;A low-level, detailed understanding of things like SEO factors and AdWords Quality Score means that you'll be able to get properly structured campaigns up and running very quickly.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Ideally, your hire has experience driving traffic to his own startup or marketing business, or has managed campaigns for a large e-commerce advertiser.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Is he obsessive and meticulous about metrics?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Internet marketing in 2011 is a lot more about analytics than creativity. You can't afford to hire someone who will be sloppy about metrics or optimization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Ask your prospective hire to build a small sample campaign or marketing plan. Is he tracking everything throughout the funnel down to the specific traffic source or creative? Is he going to write four versions of every ad and landing page and split test relentlessly?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Some of the most effective marketers I know are not Mad-Men style hustlers but rather quiet analytics nerds who love digging around in spreadsheets and building mathematical models.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: medium;"&gt;Is he a strong and prolific communicator?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;After targeting, the most important factor in any campaign's success is the strength of the copy. A good writer, even without specific copywriting experience will eventually be able to produce good copy, but a great salesman who can't write well will be bogged down by the process.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Your marketer is in charge of every point at which you interact with customers, from the headline on your landing page to registration emails. Someone who can quickly produce compelling and well-written content will have a direct and material impact on your conversion rate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;A good proxy for identifying a good writer is finding a good reader. Ask everyone you interview about the last book they read.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: medium;"&gt;Does he have experience managing both small and large budgets?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;A small marketing budget demands certain constraints that a large budget does not. Specifically, every dollar has to return results, and you can't afford to bid against large national or go on too many branding adventures.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;"Scrappy" is the word that comes to mind here.&amp;nbsp;Again, someone with experience spending his own money on marketing campaigns is most valuable here.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;You should find someone who knows how to work within the constraints of a startup budget but also has experience quickly scaling campaigns once you find product-market fit.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: medium;"&gt;Does he have the makings of a competent salesman?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Claude Hopkins famously said that marketing is salesmanship in print, and that couldn't be more true today. Many sales tactics, like identifying a customer's deepest needs and desires, addressing objections, and closing the sale are directly relevant for one-to-many marketing campaigns.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Your marketing hire doesn't necessarily need the same aggressive, outgoing personality as a top tier sales guy. But he should be able to develop a deep understanding of the customer and know how to build a relationship with customers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'll admit I based this list at least in part on myself and successful marketers I know well, so it's far from comprehensive. Are there any other qualities a great marketer possesses? Leave a comment!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By the way, we built MixRank to automate many of the research and analytics tasks you would need to hire a marketer for. We think anyone can use MixRank to build successful campaigns. &lt;a href="http://mixrank.com"&gt;Try it out today&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(we have a free version).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If you like this post, &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Insightio"&gt;subscribe by RSS&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/mixrank"&gt;follow on Twitter&lt;/a&gt; for more.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-hire-a-great-marketer-for-your-company"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-hire-a-great-marketer-for-your-company#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/-tsOK-LILmY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-hire-a-great-marketer-for-your-company</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:58:41 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>Google Hack Lets You Include Images in Search Ads</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/dGjP9J7OLwA/google-hack-lets-you-include-images-in-search</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/google-hack-lets-you-include-images-in-search</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;One of the most overlooked features of Apple's recent OS X 10.7 Lion release is support for emoji characters. Emoji is an obscure set of emoticons that's quite popular in Japan. In Lion, you can insert Emoji characters like smiley faces into any text field, much like the Wingdings font on Windows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My experience with these special characters has been a little different. The tactic of inserting special characters in an ad to draw attention to is and make it stand out from the rest has been used very effectively by advertisers in the early days of Google, Facebook Ads, and pretty much every advertising platform out there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've seen firsthand what a difference including a special character in an ad headline makes. A single arrow pictogram used in a small text ad can double, or even triple CTR.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has of course long since wised up to this practice. Any ad that contains a character from a predefined blacklist of special characters is automatically flagged for manual review and promptly denied by Google's approvals department.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But what about the newfangled emoji? Are those blacklisted as well? To test this, I submitted two ads- one using an older special characters font and one using emoji.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See the difference:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Ad2" height="171" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2011-07-21/nCwexlydrdpcDowFmkxFuosHoaauktuxwzEjxeujqqmEAahADwJnuvmlbJIE/ad2.tiff.scaled500.jpg" width="451" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ad with plain old special characters is promptly flagged for manual review on it way to be approved for denial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the ad with new emoji characters sails right through automated review, and is instantly eligible for release on an unsuspecting public.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Imagine how much an ad containing graphic icons will stand out on a search results page containing only drab text ads... I bet any such ad would completely obliterate and outrank any text ads it's competing against.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course these images will only render on operating systems that natively support emoji. Right now, that's limited to Mac OS X Lion and iOS on iPhone and iPad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, if you launch a standard search campaign, ~5-10% of the traffic that has OS X Lion will see the Emoji icons in your ad, which may or may not be enough to give a significant boost to your CTR.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there's another popular operating system made by Apple that supports rendering emoji. I'm talking, of course, about iOS, and the millions of people searching on their iPhones and iPads. And, conveniently enough, Google lets us &lt;strong&gt;target iOS users&lt;/strong&gt; only when setting up a new AdWords campaign:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Target-mobile-devices" height="202" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2011-07-21/DgaIznijeeemerHEDacDrvtvnmDDGgxnqeBszcwwucewmFHxrjgcdpwrsajo/target-mobile-devices.tiff.scaled500.jpg" width="424" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The homogeneity of that platform means that you're virtually guaranteed that 100% of searchers will see your ads and will click, if only out of curiousity at this new ad format. The intrinsically low cost of traffic and dearth of advertisers on mobile mean that, using the emoji trick with broad targeting, you can get massive volume at pennies a click.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The amount of extremely cheap traffic you could get with this method is staggering.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now...say for some reason your ad is subjected to manual review(for example, if you use this trick on the Google Content Network). No need to be concerned. What browser do you think the Google reviewers are using? It's a lot more likely that they're using Chrome than Safari, isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To Chrome users, even on OS X 10.7, an emoji emoticon appears as an inconspicious blank space. Move along Google reviewer, nothing to see here...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inserting emoji into any text field on OS X Lion is easy- just click Edit -&amp;gt;Special Characters and select Emoji in the left sidebar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My guess is that this hole won't remain open for long- so make the best of it while you can.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Props to Panic for taking this to the next level with an &lt;a href="http://www.panic.com/blog/2011/07/the-worlds-first-emoji-domain/" target="_blank"&gt;emoji domain&lt;/a&gt;. I wonder if this domain can be used as an AdWords display URL...&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/google-hack-lets-you-include-images-in-search"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/google-hack-lets-you-include-images-in-search#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/dGjP9J7OLwA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
      <media:content type="image/tiff" height="171" width="451" url="http://getfile8.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2011-07-21/nCwexlydrdpcDowFmkxFuosHoaauktuxwzEjxeujqqmEAahADwJnuvmlbJIE/ad2.tiff">
        <media:thumbnail height="171" width="451" url="http://getfile3.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2011-07-21/nCwexlydrdpcDowFmkxFuosHoaauktuxwzEjxeujqqmEAahADwJnuvmlbJIE/ad2.tiff.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
      <media:content type="image/tiff" height="202" width="424" url="http://getfile9.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2011-07-21/DgaIznijeeemerHEDacDrvtvnmDDGgxnqeBszcwwucewmFHxrjgcdpwrsajo/target-mobile-devices.tiff">
        <media:thumbnail height="202" width="424" url="http://getfile2.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2011-07-21/DgaIznijeeemerHEDacDrvtvnmDDGgxnqeBszcwwucewmFHxrjgcdpwrsajo/target-mobile-devices.tiff.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/google-hack-lets-you-include-images-in-search</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>We are officially launching</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/AiMmJIsmJqE/we-are-officially-launching</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/we-are-officially-launching</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;After many months of development, we're finally launching &lt;a href="http://mixrank.com" title="MixRank"&gt;MixRank&lt;/a&gt;, our competitor intelligence tool for contextual display ads(AdSense). We just got covered in &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/30/want-to-see-which-ads-perform-best-yc-backed-mixrank-is-a-spy-tool-for-adsense/" target="_self"&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt;, and the new users are pouring in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For some ways you can use MixRank to make more money, check out &lt;a href="http://support.mixrank.com/knowledgebase/articles/12707-5-ways-you-can-use-mixrank-to-make-more-money"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;Please give MixRank a try and let us know what you think...your feedback will be really useful as we improve the software to automate and scale every aspect of marketing research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/we-are-officially-launching"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/we-are-officially-launching#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/AiMmJIsmJqE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/we-are-officially-launching</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:41:14 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>Traffic Triage</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/bcjIyMYZk0Y/traffic-triage</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/traffic-triage</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	Chasing down profitable traffic sources can be a black hole consuming all of your time and money. The problem is that almost all paid traffic campaigns start off losing money; to build a campaign, you need to spend money collecting data on what works, and then optimize towards profitability from there.

But not all campaigns end up profitable either, no matter how much you optimize them. So, one of the marketer's biggest challenges is figuring out which traffic sources are actually worth pursuing, and which ones will never become profitable and will only consume your time and money. 

You have a limited budget, and you need to make sure you're making it count and not spending it on a wild goose chase. Here's how.

&lt;h2&gt;How to Allocate Marketing Spend&lt;/h2&gt; 
The trick to allocating your marketing effectively is implementing some kind of traffic source triage system. When encountering a new traffic source, you want to be able to quickly and consistently categorize it into a low, medium, or high priority group, &lt;strong&gt;before spending any time or money testing it&lt;/strong&gt;. 

You don't have to be 100% correct for this process. After all, you never know how something is going to work until you test it. You just have to be good enough to set priorities and build up a bankroll from stable, profitable traffic sources that you can use to offset your losses from testing riskier, lower priority ones.

A lot of the skills needed to accurately identify traffic sources will only come with experience. But you can get 80% of the way there and avoid the more egregious mistakes by following a few simple rules.

&lt;h2&gt;Three Questions You Need to Ask Yourself About Any Traffic Source&lt;/h2&gt;
When evaluating a potential traffic source, I always ask three questions that let me easily determine how much time and money I want to apply towards mastering it.
&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is there enough volume?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is the traffic cheap enough?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Does the traffic convert well enough?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;

It's important to remember that the answers to these questions are not binary. They fall on a continuum. They're intentionally vague. There are no hard and fast rules until you test, just guesses. Let's look at each one of them in more detail.

&lt;h2&gt;Is there enough volume?&lt;/h2&gt;
This question is fairly straightforward to answer. Your rep at the ad network should be able to tell you how much daily traffic you can expect from the average campaign. But you should always do your own research too.

Look at the Alexa/Quantcast/Compete rank of both their homepage and their tracking URLs to get a sense how much traffic passes through the network. Do the same for any domains you see advertised on the network. Are there mostly new, low traffic advertisers(bad) or established, successful advertisers(good) on this network?

If you're evaluating an ad network, take a look at some of the publishers running with this ad network. Are this ad network's banners the only ads on the page(good), or are you competing for attention with a cluttered field of many different ads(bad)? What's the traffic volume of some of the publishers that seem most relevant to your product?

Remember, you're only looking to estimate volume for traffic that has at least some chance of converting for you. So if you only sell to the US, inquire about US traffic volume only.

&lt;h2&gt;Is the traffic cheap enough?&lt;/h2&gt;
This question is a bit more fluid, but in general some traffic sources, keywords, and verticals are much less expensive than others.

Take a look at who's buying traffic on this network currently. What are they selling? Low margin products like commodity physical goods, or high margin financial products? How much do you think they can afford to pay for traffic? Put their domains into the Google Keyword Tool and take a look at the bids they would need to pay on search to get this kind of traffic.

How competitive is this traffic source? That may mean this traffic is higher converting and more desirable, but also more expensive.

&lt;h2&gt;Does the traffic convert well enough?&lt;/h2&gt;
This is the big one. If the traffic converts well enough, it really doesn't matter how expensive it is(as long as you're paying less per click than your CLV). Even the volume doesn't matter as much, because you can use a very relevant, highly profitable but low volume traffic source as a laboratory to test new ideas for creatives and landing pages without fear of losing money. You can then replicate the successes to higher volume but lower margin traffic sources.

You may think that it's impossible to answer this question without actually spending money testing, but it's actually easier than you think. You can't answer it precisely without significant data, but you can make some pretty good guesses based on experience and past performance. 

Think of this a comprehensive due diligence process. To answer this question, you need to start from a broad overview and move to specific details about the competitive landscape.

Have you advertised on this traffic source before? What is this ad network's reputation on blogs and forums? Has anyone written a case study about this traffic source? Does the majority of their traffic come from wealthy countries(good) or third world countries(bad)? How do they get their traffic? Are their users incentivized to view ads(bad) or click on them(VERY bad) or do they have other quality content(good)?

Then you can move to studying specifics. Who is advertising here currently, big brands(bad) or direct response advertisers(good)? Is the same advertiser buying traffic on here consistently(good) or are new advertisers constantly showing up and disappearing(bad)? Do you see the same creatives used consistently(good), or are advertisers constantly trying new creatives because they aren't getting clicks(bad)?

Check the demographics of the ad network and advertisers' domains. Do they match the demographics of your customers? Are there any advertisers with the same business model as you(e.g. sale of physical goods, freemium, etc) running on this network? Any advertisers in the same industry? Any direct competitors?

&lt;h2&gt;Decide Fast&lt;/h2&gt;
This may seem like an unnecessarily lengthy process when the key to traffic triage is making snap decisions. But spending a couple hours studying a traffic source is well worth it compared to the months of pain chasing low quality traffic will cause you. Besides, with experience, you will come to internalize this process, and it will become second nature. That's when you can start raking in the big bucks as a marketing consultant :)

&lt;strong&gt;By the way,&lt;/strong&gt; we're working on software to automate answering many of the questions above. Leave your email below and you'll be the first to get an invite to our private beta.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/traffic-triage"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/traffic-triage#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/bcjIyMYZk0Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/traffic-triage</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:39:38 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>Blackhat Tactic: How to Use Trusted Heuristics to Get Clicks</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/vaVmIuBdS4I/blackhat-tactic-how-to-use-trusted-heuristics</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/blackhat-tactic-how-to-use-trusted-heuristics</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	I saw a brilliant banner ad today, using a technique to get clicks I haven't seen before:
&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;a href="http://getfile2.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/fkqcHBzqIvhmfukdebpAyoeJepDGCJllhBJIknbgebahBdIvvtllAbsFIjkk/media_httpinsightiobl_uobhp.gif.scaled1000.gif"&gt;&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_uobhp" height="62" src="http://getfile6.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/fkqcHBzqIvhmfukdebpAyoeJepDGCJllhBJIknbgebahBdIvvtllAbsFIjkk/media_httpinsightiobl_uobhp.gif.scaled500.gif" width="500" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


Yes, that giant "Like" button is a part of the ad, and I bet it boosts CTR like crazy. It's also probably infringing on some Facebook trademark. As the title of this post says, blackhat.

The reason this ad works is that it takes advantage of a heuristic - a mental shortcut - shared by most visitors to this site. Through constant, repeated exposure, they have been conditioned to seek out and click on the Like button across the web. 

This ad might benefit from the Facebook brand by including its logo, saying subconsciously "Look, Facebook trusts us!". But it also benefits less directly from the tremendous power of that little thumbs up on the Like button.

Think about it. The real Facebook Like button takes up a tiny percent of available screen real estate on any article, and yet gets a disproportionately high number of clicks. 

We see it enough, and we feel strangely compelled to seek it out and click it. Just like the &lt;a href="http://insight.io/blog/2010/10/6-killer-facebook-ads-image-tactics-that-will-skyrocket-your-ctr/"&gt;Youtubesque play button used effectively in social ad images&lt;/a&gt;,  certain icons and symbols have tremendous magnetic power, drawing the eye in almost instantly.

They bypass traditional, rational processing and tap into heuristics buried deep inside our base, reptilian brain.
And they work very, very well.
Use them carefully.

By the way, there is another, even more powerful(and less blackhat) heuristic trick that this ad(and many others) use. Can you spot it?

&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt;:  Facebook is so prevalent that its semiotics are used frequently by lazy advertisers as a cheap way to get clicks. Here's another ad I just saw in Yahoo mail:
&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_uosaf" height="38" src="http://getfile2.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/IrxyxGxAsitayElEfxsfyeriuulkAEcIJilgAjvbgDpjifhBwyhsCzylovGA/media_httpinsightiobl_uosaf.jpg.scaled500.jpg" width="167" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/blackhat-tactic-how-to-use-trusted-heuristics"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/blackhat-tactic-how-to-use-trusted-heuristics#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/vaVmIuBdS4I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
      <media:content type="image/gif" height="90" width="728" url="http://getfile4.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/fkqcHBzqIvhmfukdebpAyoeJepDGCJllhBJIknbgebahBdIvvtllAbsFIjkk/media_httpinsightiobl_uobhp.gif">
        <media:thumbnail height="62" width="500" url="http://getfile6.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/fkqcHBzqIvhmfukdebpAyoeJepDGCJllhBJIknbgebahBdIvvtllAbsFIjkk/media_httpinsightiobl_uobhp.gif.scaled500.gif" />
      </media:content>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" height="38" width="167" url="http://getfile9.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/IrxyxGxAsitayElEfxsfyeriuulkAEcIJilgAjvbgDpjifhBwyhsCzylovGA/media_httpinsightiobl_uosaf.jpg">
        <media:thumbnail height="38" width="167" url="http://getfile2.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/IrxyxGxAsitayElEfxsfyeriuulkAEcIJilgAjvbgDpjifhBwyhsCzylovGA/media_httpinsightiobl_uosaf.jpg.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/blackhat-tactic-how-to-use-trusted-heuristics</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 21:33:50 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>Reading this Book Cost Me $15,000</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/sxyJ3QXGHkw/reading-this-book-cost-me-15000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/reading-this-book-cost-me-15000</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	If you've been following this blog you know I am a huge fan of &lt;a href="http://insight.io/blog/2010/12/5-old-school-copywriting-books-that-taught-me-everything-i-know-about-marketing/" target="_blank"&gt;learning marketing from the classics&lt;/a&gt;. Indeed, the fundamentals of human psychology and persuasion collected in these books offer tremendous insight that will help you make more money.

But, as I learned with a campaign I ran in the halcyon early days of my affiliate marketing career, you can't follow everything in the textbooks too closely.

I was building a campaign for an education(scholarship grant) offer. I had done a little traffic in this vertical before, and I knew it had potential to be a huge campaign. So I was going to do this right, just like the old masters of direct response.

Every old marketing book will tell you that 80% of marketing is research. And research I did. I spent weeks learning everything I could about my target market, trying to think like the people visiting my landing pages, finding and analyzing every single advertiser in that space, and so on. I searched all of the keywords I thought would be relevant and made huge spreadsheets of all of the headlines used in the ads and landing pages, what kind of images those landing pages used, meticulously documenting every little detail down to the color scheme they used.

And that was before I had written a single word for my landing page. That consumed the next month. I think I wrote over 300 different headlines before finally settling on one I liked, in addition to the thousands of words of copy I kept writing, editing, rewriting, scrapping, and rewriting again, until it was as perfect as I could make it.

I figured that it would be better to spend the time to create a high converting landing page than to waste money driving traffic to a worse landing page that might not convert.

&lt;strong&gt;I was wrong.&lt;/strong&gt;

To say this was  a lot of work was an understatement. It was a grind, a relentless slog. But the copywriting books promised that engaging in this process of relentless editing and refinement was worth it all. This, according to them, was what separated the good from the great.

Meanwhile, while I was laboring on my landing pages, my competitors had thrown together quick landing pages in a few hours, launched their campaigns, and were testing and optimizing based on actual click and conversion data from their traffic.

I was eventually able to launch my campaign, and it was profitable very quickly, to the tune of about $250 a day. Unfortunately, I was only profitable about about a week before conversions started dropping off. My competitors has saturated the market, and the campaign died quickly. If, instead of waiting two months to launch, I had launched this campaign right away, I could have been making $250/day for 9 weeks instead of 1 week.

Although I had not spent much money, I had given up $15,000 in lost revenue. The opportunity cost of launching this campaign late was greater than any amount I was afraid of losing from launching with an imperfect landing page.

All of the seminal copywriting literature, from Claude Hopkins to Gary Halbert was written in a very different time, when launching a marketing campaign was a slow, expensive endeavor. Back then, in the days of direct mail(that's snail mail in case it's not clear) you only had one shot to make a campaign work. If your copy didn't convert the first time around, after paying for printing, postage, and list rental, you just couldn't afford to try again.

Internet marketing changed all of that. Now, it's possible to test a campaign for only a few hundred dollars. If it fails, no big deal; most campaigns fail. &lt;strong&gt;The goal isn't to craft the most brilliant campaign ever, it's to test lots of different things and iterate quickly in response to the data the market gives you.&lt;/strong&gt;

When you're building a business, any business, you need be cognizant of opportunity costs at all times. This is difficult and does not come naturally or intuitively, and it's something I still struggle with every day. But you only have to look at how wealthy people manage their time and money to see that mastering the calculus of opportunity cost is a big coefficient, if not a precursor, of creating wealth.

I think one of the most important things any businessman does is figure out how to allocate his time and resources most efficiently. You may miss out on a few sales initially because of suboptimal landing pages, but the opportunity cost of delaying launching by even a few days will dwarf those missed sales. Every day spent tweaking your landing pages is another day of missed traffic and revenue, and it is &lt;strong&gt;costing you money right now&lt;/strong&gt;.

So don't waste time tweaking and refining your campaigns before the market has had a chance to validate their potential. Quit fucking around and just launch already.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/reading-this-book-cost-me-15000"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/reading-this-book-cost-me-15000#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/sxyJ3QXGHkw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/reading-this-book-cost-me-15000</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:38:47 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>How to Significantly Decrease PPC Click Costs</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/X5ZtTpwH6GE/how-to-significantly-decrease-ppc-click-costs</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-significantly-decrease-ppc-click-costs</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	Most paid traffic campaigns you launch will start off losing money; that's just a fact of marketing you will have to accept. 

The long term profits will come later, after you've optimized the campaign by removing poorly performing keywords and traffic sources, and increasing bids on high converting ones.

But of course it's always painful to keep running a campaign that is losing money every day, even if you know it will become profitable eventually. So let's talk about ways to decrease costs as soon as possible and get closer to profitability without blowing through your budget.

&lt;h2&gt;Optimize for an Easier Conversion Target&lt;/h2&gt;
As you know, you need to wait until you get to ~30 actions before you can get enough statistically significant data to make a decision. If you're selling physical products, you might have to wait a pretty long time before getting to 30 sales for every single ad. 

This goes directly against our prime objective of building many campaigns and learning fast. 

To get meaningful data faster, it might make sense to make your initial conversion goal 
something with a higher conversion rate, like an email opt-in on a squeeze page or even a click through to your shopping cart or sales page.

It's a lot easier and cheaper to get 30 emails than 30 sales (or even long form leads). Optimize for those, and you'll be able to see what works and what doesn't much earlier.

With me so far? How about optimizing for time on site or bounce rate? Very few advertisers do this, but the ones that can do this successfully are reaping the rewards.
This is especially important for CPV/popup traffic, where even small differences in time on site may be a good leading indicator of conversions.

If you're direct linking to an affiliate offer, it may be worth it to switch to a landing page, just so you can collect this type of data and optimize for clickthroughs.

This kind of optimization becomes a lot easier if you have good numbers about your entire sales funnel. If you know that 10% of email opt-ins consistently convert into sales or that your EPC on clicks from your landing page is always around $0.50, you're not risking much by focusing on clicks instead of conversions.

&lt;h2&gt;Cut off Losers Fast&lt;/h2&gt;
Earlier I said that you should always wait until you get to 30 actions before making a decision about a traffic source. This is true if you have an infinite budget in a market with perfect information. But since we don't, it may be worthwhile to cut a few corners.

If a campaign you just launched isn't converting at all, it might make sense to kill it early, before you have spent lots of money testing, and move on to greener pastures.

Sure, you'll miss out on a few good keywords due to random chance. But accepting a higher incidence of Type II errors may enable a good chunk of your budget to live to fight another day.

This is especially important for traffic sources like Facebook Ads or RON campaigns anywhere, which can devour budgets very quickly if you let them.

&lt;h2&gt;Optimize Your Landing Pages with Cheaper Traffic Sources&lt;/h2&gt;
It's certainly true that different landing pages convert differently with different traffic.
But some factors, especially your headlines and calls to action should affect conversions in a somewhat consistent way, regardless of traffic source.

When you're in the early stages of testing landing pages and collecting data for a campaign, try to do it as cheaply as possible. That means getting traffic from Bing/Yahoo through AdCenter, going to PPV networks with lower minimum bids, targeting a country with cheaper traffic like Canada, and so on.

Then, when your landing pages have been split tested and optimized as much as possible, you can move over to a more expensive but higher volume traffic source like AdWords.

See also this &lt;a href="http://finchsells.com/2011/04/11/how-to-fight-back-against-rising-click-costs/" target="_blank"&gt;excellent post by Finch on fighting back against rising click costs&lt;/a&gt;.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-significantly-decrease-ppc-click-costs"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-significantly-decrease-ppc-click-costs#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/X5ZtTpwH6GE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-significantly-decrease-ppc-click-costs</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:02:36 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>Examples of Psychographic Targeting on Facebook Ads</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/eXfaFUe7JIk/examples-of-psychographic-targeting-on-facebo</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/examples-of-psychographic-targeting-on-facebo</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	I've written a few times about interest targeting on Facebook as the best way to build out large-scale campaigns that can get real volume while maintaining a high CTR. 

A powerful way to use this method is by combining Facebook's existing demographic targeting parameters into new, psychographic targeting options that are not exposed by Facebook Ads directly.

For example, you can &lt;a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/3642087" target="_blank"&gt;combine location and interest targeting to identify affluent users&lt;/a&gt;.

Facebook does not let you target by income directly, but a wealthy zip code combined with membership in a luxury car owners' club is a pretty good proxy for high income. 

Of course, the inverse is also true. If you're promoting an online school, fans of WalMart living in Detroit might convert better than average. 

If you're a current student, your university might offer you access to &lt;a href="http://www.geographicresearch.com/simplymap/customers/" target="_blank"&gt;SimplyMap&lt;/a&gt;, an excellent demographic research tool. If not, you might have to trawl through census data (the 2010 data is just coming out now).

A more sophisticated psychographic factor is &lt;strong&gt;propensity for clicking on ads&lt;/strong&gt;. If 20% of the people are responsible for 80% of ad clicks, it could do wonders for your CTR to only target that 20%.

Targeting people interested in certain brands can be a very effective way to advertise only to ad clickers. The vast majority of the 430,000 people in the US interested in Wal-Mart probably acquired that interest right after clicking on a Wal-Mart ad. These are the people who notice ads; they will give you a significantly higher CTR. 

I've tested this, and it works: Combining interest in a certain brand with the demographic constraints I already know are converting well for my offer has given as much as a &lt;strong&gt;300% boost in CTR&lt;/strong&gt; for some campaigns.

In order to identify which psychographic variables, interests, or behaviors you need to add to tighten the focus of your campaigns, you need to create a deep profile of your ideal, highest converting customer.

Get really specific and build a detailed picture of the person clicking through your ads in your head. Who is one person who would convert the best? What's her name? Where does she live? Where does she work? Where does she go after work? What kind of clothes does she wear? What TV shows and movies does she watch? What strong beliefs does she hold?

The key is learning as much as possible about your target audience and &lt;strong&gt;targeting laterally based on the characteristics of your ideal customer&lt;/strong&gt;.

This process will take a lot of research, but the resulting campaigns can be incredibly powerful. 

You can target fashion offers to people who watch Glee or America's Next Top Model, gold sellers to people who like Glenn Beck, or gay dating ads to Catholic priests.

This, by the way, is an excellent way to conduct research for search campaigns and media buys.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/examples-of-psychographic-targeting-on-facebo"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/examples-of-psychographic-targeting-on-facebo#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/eXfaFUe7JIk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/examples-of-psychographic-targeting-on-facebo</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:07:02 -0700</pubDate>
      <title>Facebook Bidding: How to Rapidly Optimize Campaigns</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/aG8QnQv1gU0/facebook-bidding-how-to-rapidly-optimize-camp</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/facebook-bidding-how-to-rapidly-optimize-camp</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	A lot of the information I have posted so far has been about getting started: setting up tracking, writing ads, building out the initial scaffolding for a properly structured campaign, and so on. But setting up a campaign initially is the easy part. The real challenge comes later, when you are tasked with actually optimizing the campaign towards profitability, managing the bids, scaling up, and actually making the numbers work in a consistent manner.

So let's talk about the next stage of building profitable paid traffic campaigns. I'm going to use Facebook as an example, because managing bids aggressively is crucial for a successful Facebook campaign, but you can easily apply these high-level bidding strategies to any bid-based traffic source. 

I'm going to go through the exact process I used to rapidly build campaigns from nothing to profitably spending $5000 a day on Facebook.

&lt;h2&gt;Start Off Losing Money and Paying For Data&lt;/h2&gt;

Even the most experienced marketer's campaigns will not be instantly profitable. In fact, I've heard that over 90% of PPC campaigns start off losing money. That means you have to launch 10 diverse campaigns, on average, before you get profitable.

The truth about Internet marketing that many beginners seem unwilling to confront is that, when launching a campaign, you shouldn't expect to get profitable instantly, or even soon. If you do launch a campaign that's making money right away, consider it an incredibly fortuitous aberration, like a site going incredibly viral. 

When launching a campaign, remember that you're not paying for a scalable acquisition channel. You're only paying for data about what actually works in the marketplace. So don't be afraid to bid high. It's much better(and more cost-effective in the long run) to bid high and get enough traffic for statistically significant results than bid low and wait a month before you have gathered enough data to start optimizing. Start with the objective of getting as much data as possible as quickly as possible. On Facebook this generally means bidding $0.30-$0.60 CPC for mot demographics, although you may need to bid closer to $1.00 CPC for the most valuable users (like middle aged women).

&lt;h2&gt;Cut Low Performing Ads Quickly, Invest in High Performing Ads&lt;/h2&gt;

After choosing a broad enough demographic and biddng high enough to get a decent clicks, you can begin optimizing. But don't be too eager to optimize; if you kill an ad right away before you've collected enough data, you're basing your decisions on the whims of random chance. Be sure to wait until you get statistically significant results before deciding if an ad is effective.

&lt;strong&gt;Wait until an ad has about 30 clicks before deciding what to do with it.&lt;/strong&gt; Bidding higher and targeting larger demographics will help you get to 30 clicks and make a decision faster. Yes, this type of extensive testing will cost you more money, especially if you're testing many ads and targeting options and need 30 clicks on each variation. Sorry; You gotta pay to play.

Fear of spending money testing can paralyze you. Think of the &lt;em&gt;opportunity cost&lt;/em&gt; of not running profitable ads as soon as possible. The faster you can start running profitable ads, the more money you will make in the long term. If a particular headline or demographic is getting a good CTR, keep spending money on it, even if it's not converting profitably immediately. Facebook will begin discounting your bids and giving you cheaper traffic soon enough, as long as you can keep your CTR up.

On the other hand, if an ad has a low CTR or isn't performing well, don't try to keep it alive artificially by bidding high. &lt;strong&gt;A good CTR to aim for on Facebook is 0.1%&lt;/strong&gt;. Cut your losses, kill it mercilessly, and move on. There are so many factors you can test. No need to keep throwing good money after bad.

It's all about CTR on Facebook. Get a good CTR, and the cheap clicks will follow.

&lt;strong&gt;Expect your CTR to slip over time due to saturation and banner blindness.&lt;/strong&gt; When you see your CTR declining steadily, don't bid higher to compensate. Instead, create a similar ad with a slightly different image and start fresh. Sometimes, even reusing the same image with a different color border added is enough to maintain CTR.

&lt;h2&gt;Find Gold Nuggets with Reports&lt;/h2&gt;

Once you've gotten a decent amount of clicks and pruned the terrible CTR ads, you can begin aggresively optimizing your targeting. You've probably heard the adage that 50% of the money you spend on advertising is wasted; you just don't know which half.

Well, with Facebok Ads, you can find out where your ad dollars are being wasted. If you've been getting traffic for a few weeks, and maybe getting close to breaking even on some ads, it's time to really dive into Facebook's click reports. 

You can find the "Reports" link on the left sidebar in the Facebook Ads UI. I usually find the Responder Demographics report most helpful- it will break out exactly which users are giving you the most clicks and best CTR (and the cheapest impressions). Double down on targeting them, while still keeping an eye on conversions.

If you've started by targeting a broad demographic to get enough data, now is the time to whittle down your targeting to tightly focused ads(i.e targeting a specific age, location, or interest) based on those reports.

As always, be wary of making decisions based on statistically insignificant data. Use Facebook's reports combined with your own analytics to figure out who your most valuable clicks are coming from.

&lt;h2&gt;See How Low You Can Bid&lt;/h2&gt;
Ads that have a few weeks of solid performance history are the perfect target for aggressively optimizng your bids. Don't just settle for the amount Facebook is bidding you down to. Bid lower, wait a few hours, and see if you're still getting impressions. Keep lowering your bids &lt;em&gt;for ads that have already been running succesfully&lt;/em&gt; until you stop getting impressions. You now know your bid floor at that CTR. You'll be surprised at how low it can be.

&lt;strong&gt;You can often bid 40-70% lower than Facebook's suggested bids without losing a lot of traffic.&lt;/strong&gt;

Even in 2011, it's still very possible to pay pennies a click and get good volume on Facebook- as long as your ads and targeting are strong.

&lt;h2&gt;Scale and Replicate&lt;/h2&gt;
After a few weeks of constant tracking and optimization, you've probably got a campaign that is at least slightly profitable. You're finally ready to start scaling it up and really realizing the benefits of the vast amount of traffic Facebook can offer. Because you've already identified the most effective ads and targeting options, scaling up is a lot less risky. You're already entrenched, established. 

If you can monetize international traffic, translate your ads and build campaigns for other countries. You'll find lots of incredibly cheap traffic there if you know where to look.

Or, soften your targeting. Instead of targeting 18-25 year olds, test your strongest ads targeting 17 year olds. Use keyword research strategies to find other related keywords or interests. Check your referrers and see which apps/pages your clicks are coming from. If people are disproportionately clicking your ads when using a certain app/game, maybe you can negotiate a direct ad buy with the developers.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/facebook-bidding-how-to-rapidly-optimize-camp"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/facebook-bidding-how-to-rapidly-optimize-camp#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/aG8QnQv1gU0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/facebook-bidding-how-to-rapidly-optimize-camp</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>The Ultimate Guide to Facebook Ads Bidding</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/JdvRAi3gd_s/the-ultimate-guide-to-facebook-ads-bidding</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-facebook-ads-bidding</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	I've gotten a few questions about this, so I thought I would address this in an in-depth guide. There are too many people &lt;strong&gt;wasting too much money&lt;/strong&gt; on Facebook ads because they don't have a bidding strategy in place. Here's what typically happens to the novice Facebook advertiser: He gets excited about "social marketing" and throws up a few broadly targeted ads on Facebook, leaving the default suggested bids on, gets a terrible CTR, spends tons of money very quickly without getting enough data for statistical significance, and runs off sniveling and whining on some forum about how Facebook Ads don't work.

Let's learn right now how to avoid those mistakes, develop the right bidding strategy, monetize, and scale.

&lt;h2&gt;Suggested Bids Mean Nothing&lt;/h2&gt;
This is the most important thing to remember on any PPC platform: The suggested bids mean nothing. Absolutely nothing. They are completely random, arbitrary numbers put in place by executives to justify their revenue projections. Don't even look at suggested bids. Ignore them. They are in no way related to what anyone is actually paying on Facebook. Actual minimum bids to get impressions are based on a complex interplay of CTR, account history, available inventory, etc, and not on a single number Facebook throws at inexperienced advertisers hoping they'll bite.

Just how arbitrary are Facebook suggested bids? Consider this: A friend setting up a new Facebook Ads campaign saw suggested bids of $1.14-$1.78. For comparison, I tried to create a new ad with the exact same targeting options, and was given suggested bids of &lt;strong&gt;$0.28-$0.41&lt;/strong&gt;. Maybe my account spending history or quality score helped me get cheaper traffic. Or maybe Facebook suggested bids are created by a random number generator and don't really matter.

&lt;h2&gt;Stick to CPC Bidding&lt;/h2&gt;
It might be tempting to go for CPM bidding, because you can get lots of relatively cheap traffic without obsessing over CTR as much. But, in most circumstances, sticking to CPC bidding will give you much higher quality traffic. The reason for this: Some months ago, Facebook made a tweak in their algorithms which affect how ad impressions are distributed. CPC ads are now much more likely to be shown in premium placements on the site: profiles, news feed, and so on. These placements generally deliver a much better CTR and more clicks.

CPM ads are more likely to be shown in parts of Facebook that result in lots of impressions but not as many clicks- games and apps. When your ad has to compete with a plethora of visual stimuli from Farmville, it's a lot less likely to get noticed and get clicks.

You can easily confirm this by checking the referrers in your analytics when running ads. If you see a lot of low performing apps traffic, consider changing up your ads.

&lt;h2&gt;Bid High for Small Groups, Low for Big Groups&lt;/h2&gt;
This should be intuitive, but most people don't seem to act on this simple concept: A larger group of users will have more impressions available than a smaller, less targeted group. If you target males age 18-49, you should be able to bid less and still get traffic compared to, say, only targeting 22 year old single males. This is a good way to get data about what images or headlines work before increasing your bids to campture more traffic.

The converse is also true: If you're going for a small, highly targeted demographic (ex. using interests/like targeting), you need to start out bidding very high(even if it's very unprofitable) to beat the broadly targeted ads you're competing against that will also be shown to the same people. 

If your ads are relevant enough to the interests/likes you're targeting, you should get a good CTR (0.1% is OK, 0.2% or above is fantastic) right away, without having to split test a lot of images or headlines. This will enable you to rapidly bring your bids down significantly- probably as low as 10-15 cents a click and still get volume. 


To be continued...
&lt;em&gt;Next Week: I walk you through setting up a Facebook campaign and optimizing the bids to profitability.
&lt;/em&gt;
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-facebook-ads-bidding"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-facebook-ads-bidding#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/JdvRAi3gd_s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-facebook-ads-bidding</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:01:46 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>How ThatHigh.com Solved the Chicken and Egg Problem and Grew to 1 Million Pageviews a Month with No SEO</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/Ma0Ki7JgBeE/how-thathighcom-solved-the-chicken-and-egg-pr</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-thathighcom-solved-the-chicken-and-egg-pr</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	I dispense a lot of marketing advice on this blog. Most of it is backed up by data, or my own experience, or the conventional wisdom accumulated by thousands of marketers. But it's important to remember that, in marketing, there are no hard and fast rules or surefire strategies for success. Here's an example of a project that eschewed conventional wisdom, broke all of the rules, and managed to generate explosive, viral growth through somewhat more unconventional channels.

On the surface, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thathigh.com" target="_blank"&gt;ThatHigh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is a site that should have never gotten any traction. The primary paradigm of the site is derivative of FMyLife and not particularly unique. It falls into an incredibly competitive and increasingly fragmented humor site for college kids niche. It's aimed at a fickle, disloyal, and shall we say...forgetful audience.  And, worst of all, it faced the chicken-and-egg problem that plagues most user generated content sites- it needs content to attract users, but it needs users to generate that content.&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_lbdaq" height="146" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/rvqpwfmakrwGlvytnowDoGaxtiAoccutrbyfaHHkHxstdicuBzzwFjekEmIC/media_httpinsightiobl_lbdAq.png.scaled500.png" width="160" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


Given how stacked the odds were against it, the meteoric growth of ThatHigh to &lt;strong&gt;over 1 million pageviews a month&lt;/strong&gt; is all the more impressive. I recently spoke to the founder of ThatHigh to learn exactly how he was able to bring in significant traffic without doing SEO or spending lots of money on advertising. In his own words:

&lt;h2&gt;Getting the Idea for ThatHigh&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"&gt;While I don't consider myself to be a stoner, I have always thought that the web lacked a place for smokers of all types (casual or frequent) to discuss ideas and share hilarious or amusing thoughts. These places exist but they lack the brand and business-drive that often makes such sites successful. Most of them aren't well known. When a friend suggested I make a site like this and call it "That High" (very much a ripoff of FML), I thought the idea was too good to pass up. So I registered the domain name, and built the site with two other people over the course of one night. It was started as an experiment, more than anything.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



It seems that more than a few successful sites began as a half-formed idea built during a frenzied hackathon. If you think something might have a chance of succeeding and you can get at least something out quickly...just throw it up and see what happens.

&lt;h2&gt;Struggling to Retain Traffic&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"&gt;The first thing I tried was submitting the site to reddit, digg, and a few other private forums. This went very poorly because the site didn't have much content. I figured putting a few stories up would be enough, but it wasn't. Most of the feedback was very good, but the site didn't retain any traffic because of the lack of content.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



The vast majority of users are consumers of content, not producers. If you don't offer some value to a casual surfer immediately...They.Will.Bounce.

&lt;h2&gt;Seeding The Site With Content&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"&gt;So I made a bunch of fake accounts, mined the web, and posted as much as I could find to the site under different accounts. Then I went into the database and manually created a ton of votes for each of the stories, to make it look like there was as much activity as I could. I even posted some fake conversations in the comment sections.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;



This is exactly how reddit got initial traction too. The fact is that if you're building a content site, you need to think about getting content first, before getting users. There are two ways to do this. You can bring in high-value content producers users want to see for your site(FunnyorDie, Huffington Post, etc) or seed the site with content other users can engage with(by writing it yourself, hiring forum posters, getting interns to write blog posts, etc). 

&lt;h2&gt;Identifying and Reaching the Target Audience&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"&gt;I have no idea where I got the idea, but I decided that College Humor would share much of my target audience, so I found the "submit link" section of their website and submitted ThatHigh.com. About a week later, they accepted our submission (it's all moderated) and we got a TINY little link in their sidebar for a few days. They had changed the text to "This is your FML. This is your FML on drugs." That first day, our site got something like 20k visits. This was an absolutely enormous spike and I had certainly never run a website with that much traffic. The traffic from CH eventually trailed off (after just a few days). At that point, we had a definite userbase. Users were registering, submitting, and voting. I no longer had to fake activity, which was awesome.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



The CollegeHumor traffic spike may seem like sheer luck, but it's anything but. It's actually the result of identifying the most highly targeted and relevant audience for the site, finding the specific microtargeted segment of that audience most likely to convert into regular visitors and engage with the site (people who frequent humor sites, for example) and identifying the places they gather online.

&lt;h2&gt;Growing Without SEO&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"&gt;I've done almost zero SEO. I don't know enough about it to spend lots of time in that area. I changed the title tags to match each page's content, I submitted a site map to Google Webmaster Tools, and I added the relevant meta tags. I think my site's pagerank is something like 2 / 10, so not that great. But it turns out, for a site like this, that doesn't matter. At least not yet. I fully admit this is an area where I might see some increased traffic and revenue if I spend some time on it, but there are only so many hours in the day. My search traffic basically consists of users searching for "that high" or the standard variants.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



SEO is not the only way to get traffic for free. Instead of pandering to the caprice of search engines, your time could be better spent with on-site optimization for retention and engagement, working on increasing the amount of pageviews per user, time on site, and so on. The reason ThatHigh can grow without SEO is that it's a naturally, pardon the pun, &lt;strong&gt;sticky&lt;/strong&gt; site. The constant flow of new content in short, easy to digest bits means that some users will come back multiple times to check what's new on the site. 

Also, note how the site is carefully engineered to minimize friction whenever possible. Voting and submitting are incredibly easy to do, and don't even require registration. Minimizing the amount of mental energy required to interact with a site is key to keeping users engaged and coming back to create content.

&lt;h2&gt;Testing Paid Traffic Sources&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;I've tried advertising with AdWords, Project Wonderful, StumbleUpon, Facebook, Reddit, and a few others. By far the most effective is StumbleUpon. I put $5-$10 many months ago, and when the initial stumbles gained a good rating from the users, the site just exploded on SU. This was many months ago, and I still see a significant amount of traffic from SU daily. I think I got lucky and struck a chord with some of SU's users, and maintaining a high rating on the site ensures that it gets stumbled more often. Win! Reddit ads are probably the next best thing. I tend to stay away from CPC advertising because it doesn't give me a good return on the money. Reddit allows you to target to specific subreddits (if you like), and I've been experimenting with this again very recently to find a good strategy there.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



It's incredibly hard to justify paid advertising to promote a content site that isn't selling anything. You're essentially trying to pay for the ads through simple traffic arbitrage, a strategy that has not been very effective for quite a few years. The common theme of the traffic sources that did work for ThatHigh, and probably work for other content sites, is that paid traffic is used only for the initial push- the first few stumbles, a little bit of awareness on reddit. After that, the traffic starts coming in organically and takes off without further action from the advertiser. Consistently paying for stumbles is a foolish endeavor- but buying a few stumbles to get initial momentum can be tremendously powerful.

&lt;h2&gt;Hustling and Doing Whatever it Takes to Get Traffic&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"&gt; The hardest part, I think, was getting the initial traffic. Online ads were good, but I also spammed the hell out of my college campus (months ago). Most people want to build a site like this and then stop, wait for users, and get rich. It doesn't work that way. Every 2 days or so, I'd go to my school's quad and chalk every vertical surface I could find. Then I'd do the same thing in town. I even went to one of the dorm's and used dry-erase marker on the mirrors and windows on each floor and in each bathroom. This was pretty tedious, but it worked very well. Within days the site's traffic had doubled. This is the kind of thing that most people won't do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Sometimes, driving traffic simply demands ingenuity, creativity, and hustle. Be more creative than your competitors, work harder than them, and test faster than them. Go where your competitors dare not because they are too complacent, too conventional, too risk-averse. There are literally thousands of diverse traffic sources out there...go explore them!
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-thathighcom-solved-the-chicken-and-egg-pr"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-thathighcom-solved-the-chicken-and-egg-pr#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/Ma0Ki7JgBeE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
      <media:content type="image/png" height="146" width="160" url="http://getfile1.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/rvqpwfmakrwGlvytnowDoGaxtiAoccutrbyfaHHkHxstdicuBzzwFjekEmIC/media_httpinsightiobl_lbdAq.png">
        <media:thumbnail height="146" width="160" url="http://getfile1.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/rvqpwfmakrwGlvytnowDoGaxtiAoccutrbyfaHHkHxstdicuBzzwFjekEmIC/media_httpinsightiobl_lbdAq.png.scaled500.png" />
      </media:content>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-thathighcom-solved-the-chicken-and-egg-pr</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:24:34 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>How to Instantly Generate Credibility and Create Trust</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/d6aRx3yOWFU/how-to-instantly-generate-credibility-and-cre</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-instantly-generate-credibility-and-cre</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	You're losing lots of conversions right now for one simple reason: &lt;em&gt;Your visitors don't trust you.&lt;/em&gt;

There a lot of shady, questionable sites out there, all trying to sell something. Maybe yours is one of them, or maybe it's completely whitehat and friendly...it doesn't matter. Either way, instead of committing to a purchase a significant percentage of your visitors are leaving forever because they don't trust your marketing claims...or the quality of your product...or even your company as a whole.

Now, there are two ways to build trust:
&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Slowly and patiently build a strong, well-known brand, all the while nurturing a relationship with your customers so they get to know you and trust you.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Exploit common cognitive biases, evolutionary psychology, and centuries of socialization to instantly evoke deep, genuine feelings of trust in your customers.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
I don't know about you, but I don't have time for branding and relationship marketing. If I don't make sales &lt;em&gt;today&lt;/em&gt;, I don't eat. I know that, for 90% of the traffic to my site, I have one chance and one chance only to get you to buy, and if I miss that chance, you're just going to turn to my competitors.

So let's go ahead and see what's behind Door #2.

&lt;em&gt;Note: If you think using consumer psychology and common cognitive triggers to increase sales is unethical or manipulative, &lt;strong&gt;please stop reading now&lt;/strong&gt;. This post isn't for you.&lt;/em&gt;

Here are just a few of many time-tested, proven techniques you can use to instantly manifest authority and credibility out of thin air.

&lt;h2&gt;Always Be As Specific as Possible&lt;/h2&gt;
This one should be intuitive and obvious to you...which one of these headlines appears more persuasive:
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"This system lets you increase traffic to your website"
&lt;/strong&gt; or
&lt;strong&gt; "By using this 1 simple technique, insight.io got 73% more visitors in just 14 days"&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
You see, over many, many years, humans have learned a simple mental shortcut for differentiating between opinions and facts. In general, opinions are vague, generic, and unquantified while facts are detailed and to the point.

Nobody says "I like this dress 20% more than the other one". But people do say "This dress is $20 cheaper than the other one". See the difference?

Specific, factual statements just have a certain air of infallibility about them.

Every good liar knows the devil is in the details...the more specific you are, the more credible you appear. It's that simple.

&lt;h2&gt;Use a Readable Privacy Policy&lt;/h2&gt;
This one should be obvious, but so many people don't do this that it bears repeating. If you have a privacy policy on your site anyway (because of credit card processing regulations, Google Quality Score, whatever), why not use it as a marketing tool? Don't clutter your privacy policy with legalese. Instead, tell people about how you'll never sell or share their data, how you use the highest levels of secure encryption, and so on.

Think about it...wouldn't you be more likely to have a warm, fuzzy feeling about a site that spells out in plain English exactly what it's going to do with your personal information? Even if that site is peddling payday loans?

The type of person who clicks on a site's privacy policy is exactly the type of customer you are losing right now because of lack of trust. Assuage their fears and earn their respect. And speaking of security...

&lt;h2&gt;Strategically Deploy Symbols of Authority&lt;/h2&gt;
You've undoubtedly seen those ubiquitous security seals on every shopping cart checkout page. You know, these:
&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_chsff" height="72" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/nyGeJfqBjxhGqxwwozCEirDcgwBqdpdxlBJdotCofpHwHnFzsutEkGEesIbE/media_httpinsightiobl_ChsfF.gif.scaled500.gif" width="100" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_pijdb" height="81" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/ghCpamnsyfIxljnsxJvfEpDnmkgHcvpdoHdjnJGFbDoCekslgueHlgqivlra/media_httpinsightiobl_piJDb.gif.scaled500.gif" width="125" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


These seals, which convey no useful information, are so widespread because they work. The mere appearance of such a seal on a landing page has been repeatedly proven to increase conversions, by about 11% according to a Verisign-funded study.

You might think that these seals work because they are a way of transferring trust by proxy. That is, if Verisign, a well-known brand I trust, implicitly endorses this site, then it must be trustworthy (Of course, anyone with a few hundred bucks can obtain such a seal, but that's hardly the point of this exercise). 

That is not the case.

Another company is also in the business of providing security seals to websites. When they first launched their service, this company was a complete unknown. They had no brand or inherent credibility to speak of. All they had was an official-looking seal.

This company also commissioned a study to see how much inclusion of their seal on a sales page increased conversions. After lots of testing, this company determined that merchants putting this new security seal on their site increased conversions by an average of...

&lt;strong&gt;11%.&lt;/strong&gt;

In other words, the Verisign brand on the seal had nothing to do with the increase in conversions. They could have omitted it entirely, or used a completely different, made up brand, and it wouldn't have made a difference. 

Simply the presence of an official-looking seal, any seal, was all it took.

As long as the seal looks legit, it works its magic.

And the authority symbol doesn't even have to be a seal. 

I once tested adding a small lock icon(&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_cqaaw" height="48" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg.scaled500.jpg" width="48" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
) next to the text input on an email opt-in landing page for a financial product. The simple act of adding that lock icon, which only took a few seconds, &lt;strong&gt;increased opt-ins by 7.2&lt;/strong&gt;% versus a nearly identical page with no lock. Not bad for a few minutes' work.

The reason these specific symbols work isn't arbitrary...it's the product of years of social conditioning. Every bank website, every secure login page, every check ever written has imprinted in our collective unconscious that &lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_cqaaw" height="48" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg.scaled500.jpg" width="48" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;=TRUST&lt;/strong&gt;. "Trust us..." that little icon implores. "Your data is secure with us."

&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_cqaaw" height="48" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg.scaled500.jpg" width="48" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;=TRUST&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_cqaaw" height="48" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg.scaled500.jpg" width="48" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;=TRUST&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class='p_embed p_image_embed'&gt;
&lt;img alt="Media_httpinsightiobl_cqaaw" height="48" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg.scaled500.jpg" width="48" /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;=TRUST&lt;/strong&gt;

The Milgram experiments (and thousands of subsequent infomercials) proved that people will obey the most ludicrous commands as long as they're coming from someone in a lab coat. All you need to do is show them a glimpse of the trappings of authority...and they're yours.

The collective marketing done by thousands of companies has already done the hard work of creating an incredibly effective brand signifying safety and security. All you have to do is reap the benefits.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-instantly-generate-credibility-and-cre"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-instantly-generate-credibility-and-cre#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/d6aRx3yOWFU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
      <media:content type="image/gif" height="72" width="100" url="http://getfile1.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/nyGeJfqBjxhGqxwwozCEirDcgwBqdpdxlBJdotCofpHwHnFzsutEkGEesIbE/media_httpinsightiobl_ChsfF.gif">
        <media:thumbnail height="72" width="100" url="http://getfile9.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/nyGeJfqBjxhGqxwwozCEirDcgwBqdpdxlBJdotCofpHwHnFzsutEkGEesIbE/media_httpinsightiobl_ChsfF.gif.scaled500.gif" />
      </media:content>
      <media:content type="image/gif" height="81" width="125" url="http://getfile0.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/ghCpamnsyfIxljnsxJvfEpDnmkgHcvpdoHdjnJGFbDoCekslgueHlgqivlra/media_httpinsightiobl_piJDb.gif">
        <media:thumbnail height="81" width="125" url="http://getfile3.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/ghCpamnsyfIxljnsxJvfEpDnmkgHcvpdoHdjnJGFbDoCekslgueHlgqivlra/media_httpinsightiobl_piJDb.gif.scaled500.gif" />
      </media:content>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" height="48" width="48" url="http://getfile4.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg">
        <media:thumbnail height="48" width="48" url="http://getfile0.posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/import-fwkw/AyhuDadfmtvqtydhkpikFItyHeEfEbevdjqypDwiAJavrosoxoiIggeftFrG/media_httpinsightiobl_CqaAw.jpeg.scaled500.jpg" />
      </media:content>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-instantly-generate-credibility-and-cre</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:40:27 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>How to Outmarket, Outmaneuver, and Dominate Your Better Funded Competitors and Leverage Their Greatest Strengths Against Them</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/4EaNRwULUko/how-to-outmarket-outmaneuver-and-dominate-you</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-outmarket-outmaneuver-and-dominate-you</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;This is part 2 of a series of indeterminate length about succeeding in a crowded market. You can read the first part &lt;a href="http://insight.io/blog/2010/12/how-to-succeed-in-a-crowded-market-part-1/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage. 
-Niccolo Machiavelli&lt;/strong&gt;

If you're in any decently-sized marketplace, you're going to come up against at least a few significant competitors. Let's face it, at this point, pretty much all demand in any market is being met by...something at least. 

Some of your competitors, even if you think they have an inferior product, are probably better-funded, have stronger brand value, or have well-developed inbound marketing campaigns (or all three). They're probably running numerous successful, established campaigns across multiple channels. If you go up against them directly, on their turf, they will destroy you.

But, if you take a tactical, tightly focused, agile approach, you can defeat even the most entrenched behemoths. Here's how you can run circles around your biggest competitors, no matter how much money they throw at stopping you: 


&lt;h2&gt;Watch as Stability Turns into Stagnation&lt;/h2&gt;
Like it or not, in the fast-moving Internet marketing world, being an established player that has been around for a while confers &lt;strong&gt;tremendous advantages&lt;/strong&gt;. These benefits can manifest directly in the significant organic ranking and quality score boost Google gives to aged domains (those that have been registered for more than a few years without a change in Whois). This is presumably because, unlike, say, keyword density, domain age is much harder to game.

But the effects of age can also manifest themselves in other, subtler ways. An affiliate who has been running an offer for a while has demonstrated that he is capable of consistently delivering high quality traffic. As a result, he is probably getting a higher payout than you and can afford to outbid everyone else.

And of course, any performance advertisers running traffic for some time have had time to collect lots of data, optimize their campaigns, and remove low-performing ads and keywords.

But consistent stability also breeds complacency. And as any affiliate who has watched his earnings from a previously stable campaign dwindle into nothingness over time, in this business, complacency is death.

Leverage your competitors' complacency and turn it against them. Where are they getting weak, fat, and lazy?

Look at the highest converting keywords you covet most. Do you see your competitors rotating different headlines and landing pages or are they using the same ones? Is their ad position changing a lot (implying that they are actively managing their bids) or is it holding steady?

If you're seeing a lot of stagnation in your competitors' campaigns, that's when you know it's time to strike. Start bidding aggressively, using a variety of diverse headlines and landing pages. The more completely diverse appeals you try, the higher the chances you will stumble on a combination of medium and message that produces significant lift in conversions or CTR, thus negating their established history and higher bids. 

Most advertisers lack the ability to monitor changes in their ad position and performance for every keyword. Once something is profitable, more often than not, they will fall asleep at the wheel and let the campaign run on autopilot as they move on to optimizing different market segments or traffic sources.

This is especially true with contextual (cost per view) and display campaigns, and of course SEO. Most advertisers will optimize a campaign to the point of profitability and then leave it alone, opting to move on to completely different channels. 

For you, this means that when you go up against big advertisers, &lt;strong&gt;on keywords and placements they are not actively optimizing&lt;/strong&gt;, you'll be able to capture some traffic and market share without engaging in a bidding war with them. A big ad budget isn't worth much if you aren't actively using it. This method can be hugely profitable, especially on the long tail and at the fringes. 

There's no need to fight a losing battle with a big advertiser over traffic they're actively seeking. Instead, slowly but steadily sap the traffic they don't even remember they have.

&lt;h2&gt;Exploit Their Testing Budget by Scaling Horizontally Into New Channels&lt;/h2&gt;
By running a large campaign, your competitors are releasing lots of data into the wild. Thousands of headlines, keywords, banner ads, etc are all publically available for you to study and learn from. 

Remember, Internet marketing isn't magic. It's simply scientific testing and the application of a few fundamental principles.

When you see large, well-funded competitors extend their tendrils into thousands of sites and keywords(you know, when you get the sense that you're seeing their ads everywhere), it's easy to feel frightened and overwhelmed.

"How could I ever compete with them?" you think. "Their brand is so...established".

But they're not doing anything special. They just have a bigger testing budget than you. And a bigger testing budget simply means they can afford to make more mistakes.

So let them make mistakes and spend their money testing. Then, once they've figured out what works, and started scaling it, when you've seen many ad variations replaced by one or two they are running consistently, it's fairly easy to figure out what the most effective way to reach that particular target market is.

You probably shouldn't copy their ads exactly. But there's nothing wrong with taking the fundamentals of their campaign, like their main appeal(is it a price appeal? a particular benefit appeal?), main keywords, the types of images they use in their banners, and scaling them horizontally to other, very related traffic sources and demographics.

Do you think every single Google advertiser is also on Yahoo/Bing? Is every Pulse360 advertiser also running the same ads on AdSonar? Is every single PPV advertiser distributing campaigns evenly between TrafficVance, LeadImpact, and MediaTraffic?

One of the most effective ways to easily generate new revenue is taking an existing campaign and porting it over to a related traffic source. Why not do the same with your competitors' campaigns? There are plenty of keyword research tools out there that will show you competitors' exact ads and keywords. (I recommend SEMRush). Learn from those campaigns, and scale them up.

Wait for your large competitors to optimize their campaigns, learn the fundamentals that make them effective, and port them over to related traffic sources.

Remember when I posted some of the most effective Facebook ad images? Thousands of people downloaded those images. Most simply put them, unchanged, into new Facebook campaigns. Those campaigns faltered, because Facebook users had already developed banner blindness for those images. 

But a few clever people looked at those images, which were the result of many different advertisers spending millions of dollars testing, and figured out which specific patterns, like a picture of a crying baby, were most effective.

Then, they used those tried and tested patterns to build out campaigns on alternative, less saturated, yet technically similar traffic sources like Plenty of Fish, and got profitable very quickly.

Let your competitors spend money testing and optimizing. The bigger they are, the easier it will be for you to quickly learn what works best.

Then learn what works, adapt it to your own campaigns, and scale.

&lt;strong&gt;tl;dr Summary:&lt;/strong&gt; Having strong, well-funded direct competitors with large paid traffic campaigns gives you two advantages you probably weren't aware of:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Their campaigns are so large that they are not actively optimizing/managing bidding on all of their keywords and media buys, especially towards the long tail, leaving an opportunity for you to come in and take over.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The wide reach of their ads makes it easy to collect lots of data on what works best. You can effectively hijack their massive marketing budget for your own benefit. Large marketing spend means you can collect lots of accurate data from keyword tools, demographic research tools like Quantcast, as well as old-fashioned manual competitor research.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;hr /&gt;

As you may have guessed, the upcoming release of &lt;a href="http://www.insight.io"&gt;insight.io&lt;/a&gt; will automate and scale many of these data collection and optimization tasks for you...but that's some time away. It won't hurt to put your email on the beta list though :)
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-outmarket-outmaneuver-and-dominate-you"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-outmarket-outmaneuver-and-dominate-you#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/4EaNRwULUko" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-outmarket-outmaneuver-and-dominate-you</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:27:07 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>How To Find Long Tail Keywords That Bring Massive Traffic</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/wTdLH_c4H1o/how-to-find-long-tail-keywords-that-bring-mas</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-find-long-tail-keywords-that-bring-mas</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	Let's talk about long tail keywords. Whether you're doing SEO for a content site or building out a PPC campaign for an ecommerce site, you're going to be focused almost exclusively on long tail keywords, because the shorter keywords are either too competitive or too expensive.

You need to remember this about long-tail keywords: Getting a little bit of traffic from random long-tail keywords is relatively easy. Getting lots of high-converting traffic from long-tail keywords is hard. &lt;em&gt;Very hard&lt;/em&gt;.
It's so hard that Demand Media has built a billion dollar company largely on their ability to find good long-tail keywords, and Yahoo paid a lot of money for Associated Content to try to do the same.

Plugging in your main keywords into keyword tools is a losing strategy; You will probably have dozens of competitors using the same keyword tool, targeting the same exact cheaper keywords. 

Racking your brain for synonyms and misspellings may give you a few golden, uncompetitive, profitable keywords, that will result in 1-2 sales a day, but we're not really interested in that here at insight.io.

We're interested in rapidly delivering lots of traffic. We don't want the piddling 10 visits a day from people who can't spell. We want a server-melting avalanche of traffic that will catapult your business and revenues to a level you never thought possible.  

And in order to accomplish that, your keywords need to be &lt;em&gt;scalable&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;h2&gt;Scalable Long Tail Keywords Lead To Big Profits&lt;/h2&gt;

Let's say you're selling hard drive data recovery software. Here are two hypothetical long tail keywords you might use:

&lt;strong&gt;download data recovery software&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;seagate data recovery software&lt;/strong&gt;

Let's assume for the sake of argument that both keywords are equally competitive, have the same traffic volume, and convert exactly the same. If you could only pick one for a new campaign, which one would you pick? Don't think it matters? One of these keywords could be 10 times more valuable for your business. 

What other keywords naturally come to mind first to expand this list further? How about:

&lt;strong&gt;seagate data recovery software&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;hitachi data recovery software&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;toshiba data recovery software&lt;/strong&gt;

The secret is that one of these keywords has a &lt;em&gt;specific&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;easily varied&lt;/em&gt; modifier that can be changed to quickly scale the campaign with equally relevant yet diverse keywords. This means that you can rapidly and easily build out highly relevant ad groups without using keyword tools or worrying about synonyms or misspellings.

It took me about 5 seconds to find a list of hard drive manufacturers I can use as the backbone of my campaign structure. This technique isn't limited to brands or types of products.

We can try this for dating(ages):
&lt;strong&gt;singles over 30&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;singles over 40&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;singles over 50&lt;/strong&gt;

or weight loss( list of food):
&lt;strong&gt;low fat salad dressing&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;low fat soup&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;low fat cake&lt;/strong&gt;

No matter what you're advertising, if you start by thinking of a single &lt;em&gt;specific keyword containing an easily varied modifier&lt;/em&gt;, it will only take a few minutes to build a campaign that contains only cheap long-tail keywords but still delivers significant traffic volume.

This is one of the secrets top marketers use to build multi-million dollar campaigns: start with an easy to modify long tail keyword, and scale.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-find-long-tail-keywords-that-bring-mas"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-find-long-tail-keywords-that-bring-mas#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/wTdLH_c4H1o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-find-long-tail-keywords-that-bring-mas</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:39:21 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>How to Succeed in a Crowded Market (part 1)</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/kmLuQQSG0y4/how-to-succeed-in-a-crowded-market-part-1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-succeed-in-a-crowded-market-part-1</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	If there's one thing affiliate marketing teaches you, it's how to survive in the face of fierce compatition. As an affiliate marketer, I frequently found myself competing against hundreds if not thousands of affiliates, all of them promoting the same product to the same customers on the same traffic sources.

All of the fundamental principles of traditional marketing, like differentiation, a USP, price testing, etc mean nothing, because everyone is running the same ads for the same exact product, linking to that same landing page.

There is no fluff like branding or engagement. This is raw, pure performance marketing, where the only things that matter are clicks and conversions. Even the most successful affiliate campaigns are fleeting- blink, and someone with a slightly more optimized campaign will destroy you.

Affiliate marketing in a competitive niche is something of a trial by fire. Words like "traction" or "angel funding" are unknown. You either convert enough of your traffic into sales to turn a profit immediately, or you die and a hundred marketers who are hungrier than you vie to take your place.
If you can build a profitable business in that space, you can do it anywhere.

This is the business environment I cut my teeth on marketing in, so you could say I know a thing or two about succeeding in the face of stiff competition.

It may seem impossible to succeed in a space that already has established, better funded competitors. But, as a newcomer, you have several incredibly powerful advantages over your competition. Utilize them, and you will be able to outmaneuver the most determined competitors every single time.

Here's exactly how I was able to enter the most saturated verticals out there- dating, insurance, fitness- and build $1000-a-day campaigns despite the presence of sophisticated, entrenched competitors.

&lt;h2&gt;Don't Educate The Market: Capture Traffic at a Later Stage of the Buying Process&lt;/h2&gt;

You probably know that customers go through several distinct phases when researching a product and committing to buy. Remember Glengarry Glen Ross:
&lt;object height="385" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;
&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /&gt;
&lt;param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/y-AXTx4PcKI?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US" /&gt;
&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/y-AXTx4PcKI?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" height="385" width="480"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;

The stages of the buying process are:
&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Attention&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Interest&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Desire&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Action&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

If you're in a competitive market, you will have competitors advertising to customers at every stage of the buying process. Many of your competitors, particularly big brands, are spending a lot of money to &lt;em&gt;educate the market&lt;/em&gt; - to show potential customers that they have a problem their product or service can solve. Before committing to a purchase they will research all the alternatives, especially if they are B2B customers. While these people are doing research, they're costing your competitors serious money in ad clicks and impressions, but are not converting into sales, because they're still in the research phase of the sales cycle.

Don't bother trying to educate the market- let your competitors spend money convince customers they need a product or service in your industry. Then, when they're finally ready to buy, when they're finally at that ACTION stage, swoop in and get the sale. Here's exactly how you can do this:

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Consider buyer intent&lt;/strong&gt; Bid on keywords that demonstrate strong intent to buy- "buy voip service" vs "voip service provider comparison". Generally, the later you get into the sales cycle, the more expensive keywords become, but the jump in conversion rate usually makes up for this.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Don't bid for top position&lt;/strong&gt; There are many reasons why you shouldn't bid for the #1 position in a group of ads, and this is one of them. Frequently, consumers will click on the top 2-3 ads for a search result as part of their research process, just to understand the marketplace. Then they will click on another, lower position, ad and actually make the purchase. For this reason, many more sophisticated advertisers test how bids and ad position affect conversion rates. Many find that position 3-4 is the "sweet spot" that actually converts better than being in position #1.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

Next week, I discuss how to convert your rivals' greatest strengths into unbeatable competitive advantages you can use to dominate the market.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-succeed-in-a-crowded-market-part-1"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-succeed-in-a-crowded-market-part-1#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/kmLuQQSG0y4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/how-to-succeed-in-a-crowded-market-part-1</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:05:21 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>This Common Tracking Mistake Is Costing You Thousands of Dollars</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/t2Pxmm6Ux08/this-common-tracking-mistake-is-costing-you-t</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/this-common-tracking-mistake-is-costing-you-t</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	A few years ago, when I was still getting my feet wet in internet marketing and not making very much money, I had a conversation with an incredibly successful affiliate marketer. This man had come from humble beginnings, starting with little seed money and no marketing knowledge to generating millions of dollars in commissions for himself in less than a year.

And he did this by promoting lead-gen offers in the financial space, one the most fiercely competitive and difficult to break into niches out there.

Of course, I was dying to learn the secret of his success.

I knew he worked very hard, but lots of people work hard without approaching his level of success. So I pressed him to tell me exactly what he was doing to be wildly successful where so many of his competitors failed. And he told me.

He said....

&lt;h2&gt;"I track &lt;em&gt;everything&lt;/em&gt; down to the individual ad level from impression to conversion"&lt;/h2&gt;

He was advertising on AdWords in the highly contested finance niche, where clicks could easily cost $4-$10 each. His competitors were experienced affiliates and PPC managers for major performance advertisers, so they knew what they were doing.
They all carefully tracked each keyword via a unique subid, so they knew exactly which keywords were converting well for their offer. But they weren't tracking everything.

When building a PPC campaign, most advertisers, even experienced search marketers, take two parallel paths in optimizing their campaign:
&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;They look at every keyword's CTR and conversion rate, and eliminate poorly performing keywords that either have a high CPC(because of low CTR) or a low EPC(because of low conversion rate)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Simultaneously, they test different headlines on their ads to see which one gets more clicks, keeping the ads that have a higher CTR&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Do you see what they're missing????&lt;/h2&gt;

After finding keywords, the advertisers in this niche would spend most of their efforts on writing enticing ads, using words like FREE! and Try It Now! that would get a lot of clicks, thus lowering their cost per click.

This clever affiliate wasn't doing that, because he knew better. And the reason he knew better is that he wasn't just tracking how every keyword was converting like everyone else...he was also tracking how every single ad he wrote was converting.

For every ad he wrote, he appended a unique tracking ID to the destination URL, which would get passed through as part of the subid to that offer. He had a huge spreadsheet listing thousands of these ID numbers and the unique ad variation and ad group it corresponded to.

The meticulous record keeping paid off. By tracking how every single ad converted, he soon realized that his most profitable and successful ads were not the ones with the highest CTR. In fact, some of the ads that got less clicks were responsible for the majority of conversions.

Those clicks cost more, but they brought in much higher quality traffic. Instead of trying to get as many people as possible to click on his ad, he pre-qualified potential customers through the ad text, so only the most motivated and profitable customers clicked through to his landing page.

When all of his competitors were losing money trying to get a high click through rate and getting cheaper clicks, he optimized his campaign at the individual ad level, went for &lt;em&gt;targeted&lt;/em&gt; clicks over cheap clicks and was incredibly successful.

Had this affiliate not been tracking every ad, he would have continued to put up high-CTR but low converting ads, lost money on the campaign, and missed out on millions of dollars in revenue for his business.

Track every single headline, body, display URL, image, anything and everything. Follow the user from the specific ad all the way to the conversion.

If you're not tracking every little bit of data possible, I guarantee you're losing money. Don't make that mistake.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/this-common-tracking-mistake-is-costing-you-t"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/this-common-tracking-mistake-is-costing-you-t#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/t2Pxmm6Ux08" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/this-common-tracking-mistake-is-costing-you-t</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:47:53 -0800</pubDate>
      <title>5 Old-School Copywriting Books That Taught Me Everything I Know About Marketing</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Insightio/~3/UyX-5g-8F3g/5-old-school-copywriting-books-that-taught-me</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mixrank.com/5-old-school-copywriting-books-that-taught-me</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
	A lot of people have been emailing me asking some variation of "I'm kind of new to all of this marketing stuff. Is there a book I can read that will get me up speed on all this?"

Well...yeah I guess. There are lots of books about specific marketing tactics, like SEO or optimizing AdWords campaigns. But I'm a firm believer in getting the fundamental strategy right before getting into specific traffic tactics(and maybe even before you write a single line of code). That means figuring out how big your target market is and what it wants, converting your main features into the biggest benefits, and eliciting attention, interest, desire, and action from your most valuable customers.

The thing that surprises technical people most when we talk about this stuff is that building effective marketing messages is not an airy-fairy, vague, creative endeavor. Done well, it's actually a very precise, and methodical process designed to systematically and consistently elicit specific reactions in certain groups of customers.

In the past century, direct response advertisers(the ones interested in generating conversions rather than branding) have developed and refined time-tested marketing messages that operate on the core drives and desires inherently present in all humans. The medium and technology may change, but human psychology does not, and the techniques detailed in the books below, ranging from broad advice on picking a fundamental human desire to target, down to specific words that increase conversions, are timeless.

I'll be blogging about some of the time-tested advertising methods that are most relevant to driving traffic online, but I don't want to be like one of those "gurus" who simply rehash material from copywriting classics. If you have time, I would rather you read the books below yourself and get the full benefit of absorbing the knowledge of their authors directly from the source.

All of these books are written by men who were incredibly successful in direct response advertising in their time. The advice they give is based on thousands of split tests and decades of experience building some of the most successful advertising campaigns of all time.

If you read these books, study them, really absorb the insights they offer, you will become a master of tapping your customers' most pressing desires, and presenting your product as the solution to the problem they're most concerned about.



&lt;strong&gt;Claude Hopkins - Scientific Advertising and My Life In Advertising&lt;/strong&gt;
The granddaddy of them all, a seminal work that brought tracking and split testing into the mainstream 80 years ago. You can take his advice about writing short newspaper classified ads and apply it directly to your AdWords ads.

&lt;strong&gt;Eugene Schwartz - Breakthrough Advertising&lt;/strong&gt;
A dense and information-packed tome that reads more like a textbook. It's not easy to absorb and apply all of the information in this book, and you will undoubtedly need to reread it multiple times, but if you put in the effort to do so you will be greatly rewarded. The book spends a great deal of time on the science of writing headlines, and some of the advice on channeling mass desire into powerful headlines is brilliant. The same methods Schwartz used to entice millions into reading his ads can be used to get you more votes on social news sites(Hello Hacker News!), more clicks on AdWords and social ads, and more signups on your landing page.

&lt;strong&gt;John Caples - Tested Advertising Methods&lt;/strong&gt;
Caples was a legend in mail order advertising, and pioneered many of the methods now used by e-commerce merchants. He understands the importance of writing strong headlines, and offers some excellent, specific examples on the topic, as well as a wealth of information on crafting strong appeals. The gems of knowledge Caples drops on every page can be applied to everything from tweets and blog posts to large-scale PPC campaigns.

&lt;strong&gt;John E. Kennedy - Reason Why Advertising&lt;/strong&gt;
Even among scholars of marketing strategy, few know about this rare, incredible book. Over a hundred years ago, Kennedy's ideas on targeting and testing were revolutionary, and remain groundbreaking in many ways to this day. The few marketers who have mastered Kennedy's strategies are able to rapidly and easily out-market and out-compete the majority that blindly throw their money away on campaigns that could never work. Some of the concepts presented in this all-too-obscure work may seem obvious or trite to the contemporary consumer but simply thinking through Kennedy's approach to building advertising campaigns and how it applies to your product or service will bring tremendous benefits.

&lt;strong&gt;David Ogilvy - Ogilvy on Advertising&lt;/strong&gt;
David Ogilvy is probably the best known marketer on this list. He diligently studied the techniques of the copywriting masters who came before him, and parlayed that knowledge into one of the most successful ad agencies in the world. The book is chock full of specific, actionable advice on everything from crafting good copy to the best layout and design for a display ad. Many, but not all, of the strategies he used for magazine advertising can work very well for your landing pages. Lock your designers in a room with this book, and don't let them out until they've memorized it.

Again, I'm forced to cut an already too long post short. Marketing, like programming, is both and art and a science that can take many years to master. The authors listed above literally wrote the book on contemporary advertising. Learn the basics from them, and you will look at your existing marketing strategy and product with a completely different perspective. Master the intricacies of their knowledge and experience, and I guarantee that the way you approach developing anything that reaches other people, from a simple webapp side project to a sophisticated marketing campaign, will never be the same again.
	
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/5-old-school-copywriting-books-that-taught-me"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt; 

	| &lt;a href="http://blog.mixrank.com/5-old-school-copywriting-books-that-taught-me#comment"&gt;Leave a comment&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Insightio/~4/UyX-5g-8F3g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <posterous:author>
        <posterous:userImage>http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/1519387/ilya.jpeg</posterous:userImage>
        <posterous:profileUrl>http://posterous.com/users/hcGHFNtNlM1aG</posterous:profileUrl>
        <posterous:firstName>Ilya</posterous:firstName>
        <posterous:lastName>Lichtenstein</posterous:lastName>
        <posterous:nickName>mixrank</posterous:nickName>
        <posterous:displayName>Ilya Lichtenstein</posterous:displayName>
      </posterous:author>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://blog.mixrank.com/5-old-school-copywriting-books-that-taught-me</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>

