INTEL-PROCESSORS

Moblin - Intel's Open Source OS

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:22:00 +0000

Moblin is Intel's open source Linux based operating system built specifically for the new breed of computers called netbooks that run Intel's proprietary Atom x86 chips. As it is targeted at Netbooks segment, the operating system developed by the world's largest chipmaker is more focused and centered around Internet and Multimedia, and less on productivity tools such as office suites. It is more about twittering, updating social networking profiles and watching movies on the go. For those who cannot live without an office suite, there are many online alternatives, most of them free such as Google docs and zoho writer ...... but surprisingly the moblin developers seem to have steered away from Google as the OS does not support Google gears and uses Yahoo! as the default and 'recommended' search engine. The developers do seem out of touch with times for this surprising choice.

Technically, Moblin is nothing but a linux distro, but benefits largely from its uniquely tweaked refinements and a radical user interface. Missing from this OS are popular linux softwares such as GIMP ( GNU image manipulation program ) and openoffice.org .Though the distro is based around the familiar GNOME/GTK desktop environment, the fact is easily overlooked and largely invisible because of the UI improvements.

The offline functionality of this OS is limited to playing movies and music. Being free of charge and based on the widely used x86 chips, you can download and try it for yourself on virtually any computer or using OS virtualization solutions such as virtualbox or VMware fusion. However it's requirement of 3D graphic drivers means its performance on VM software will be far from optimal. The first beta of Moblin 2.0 has just been released, so don't be surprised to find more than a few bugs.

The Intel I7 Core Monster

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:20:00 +0000

November 2008 saw one of the most important event in the history of Computing when Intel unveiled the fastest processor on earth aka The Intel I7 Core 965 - Extreme Edition. The fastest processor Intel Core 2 Quad QX9770 became just a predecessor and the computing world was redefined.

So what is that I7 Core Monster Offers making it the best processor ever made? This is the question I can hear from your side. Unfortunately the answer cannot be given in a single line. After you read the statistics below, you too will understand why. So let's start...

Intel I7 Core has two "younger brothers" in the category. The Intel I7 Core 920 and Intel I7 Core 940.

First of all, let us discuss the Architecture of Intel I7 Core 965 EE (Extreme Edition) and find out what changes have been made to it. One thing that we will keep in mind is that all the comparisons will be made between Intel I7 Core 965 EE and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770. So this will help us better understand the differences between the two.

Now before getting to know the differences lets see what are similarities in them. Both I7 core and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 are built using the 45 nanometer wafer technology, they both are based on Penryn cores and share the same clock speed of 3.2 GHz. The similarities ends here and what we now have a Monster completely different from the former version.

Now here follows the technical stuff that gives the physical differences between the two and clearly votes out the Core 2 Extreme. Intel I7 Core Has 731 Million Transistor on board of 263 mm2. the I7 core does not have a 12MB L2 cache. It instead has a Third level L3 shared cache of 8MB. It has maximum 24 non-turbo unlocked multiplier both up an down. The cooling fan has a size increase too and it is apparent as the new I7 core will be needing a better cooling solution as compared to the former edition. The memory controller is integrated and so you can expect huge memory bandwidth. The Hyper Threading Technology introduced in the Intel Pentium 4 Prescott has made a return with the I7 core and so the I7 core can handle 8 thread simultaneously. It also features improved branch predictions resulting into "Intelligent" computing at higher speeds.

Now comes the benchmarks that you must be interested in if you are not a techy like me. So let us first define the system that will run this monster. Now the board that we will be using is Intel X58 knows more popularly as Intel X58- Smackover. Smackover supports a sizzling speed of 8.5 GB/s between the processor and the RAM and a QPI Speed of 25.6 GB/s. This platform supports a tri-channel DDR3 memory and so we will be using 1 GB modules supplied at 1066 MHz and with latencies of 7-7-7-20 at 1.5 volts.

FUTUREMARK 3DMark Vantage

When the Turbo Mode is disabled I7 core 965 gave a distinct 15 % increase in the speed. While enabling the Turbo Mode gave a performance higher by 19.5 % which is very impressive. This performance increase was achieved without over clocking the processor. In over clocked state the performance delivered by Intel I7 core 965 EE was 30% more as compared to Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 predecessor.

PCMark Vantage

While we tested the two cores for PCMark Vantage, the data we gathered impressed us showing clear signs of Performance shift on the higher side with the I7 core 965 EE over clocked.

Without Over clocking the processor the I7 core outperformed Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 53% and over clocking it gave a performance boost as high as 75%. This is a superb performance that you can expect.

SiSoftware Sandra

These are the tests that you are probably interested in as this will give the basic idea of how fast the system is in terms of Multi-Media support.

The performance boost that a general user can have is in terms of Memory Bandwidth, Processor Arithmetic (How fast is the processor), Multi-Media Support and the Multi-Core Efficiency. Have a look at those test individually and judge yourself!

Memory Bandwidth Performance Tests

The performance tests shows that Integrating the memory controller on the die has helped Intel I7 core squeeze out exceptional memory bandwidth of 18GB/s with just DDR3 RAM at 1066 MHz in normal state. When over clocked, an additional of 3.1 GB/s memory bandwidth is added making a total of 21.1 GB/s. This is impressive and it clearly knocks out the Core 2 Quad Q9650.

Processor Arithmetic Tests

Taking a look at the processor arithmetic, I7 core 965 EE shows a performance boost of 72% in over clocked state and a performance boost of 58% otherwise.

Multimedia Float Test

Multimedia Float Tests show a huge performance boost of 55% over the predecessor. It is impressive as this is the fastest in the Cutting Edge technology specs.

Multi-Core Efficiency

Now this benchmark is designed to test multi-core processors with different architecture. This test will show data related to the connection speed between the cores and not the speed of the cores. As Intel I7 core supports the new QPI technology and have brought back the days of Hyper Threading technology it is definitely going to have its stand above all the processors.

The Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor shows an impressive speed of 18 GB/s. In comparison I7 core fares almost double. But what impressed us most is the I7 core 965 EE over clocked where it registered a speed of 45 GB/s at 3.88 GHz.

CINEBENCH Tests

This benchmark specifically focuses on the Highly Graphics Intensive User Group. So if you are looking for a good solution in terms of Graphics Support and performance, these tests should help make a clear choice without any kind of confusion. These also includes the group of people related with the Video Editing Industry.

Multi-CPU Render

Hereto I7 core fared a good 21% margin over Core 2 Quad Q9650 in normal state and showed a performance boost of 35% in over clocked state. This was achieved due to the inclusion of on-board memory controller and use of Hyper Threading Technology that bypassed the limitations of FSB.

OpenGL Render

The same architecture has also helped I7 Core race ahead of its predecessor and show an impressive boost of 18% in terms of performance with OpenGL Rendering Test.

Adobe Premiere Pro

This superb piece of software is used extensively in the Video Editing Industry and is used widely for video editing. Premiere Pro heavily depends on the CPU configuration and the memory bandwidth available to it for video Rendering. So it is but natural that tests with Premiere Pro will show significant boosts.

The video file that was used in the test was rendered within 29 seconds by the predecessor of I7 core, Core 2 Quad Q9650 while what impressed us was the time taken by I7 core 965 EE. It was just 22 seconds without over clocking and it was 18 seconds with over clocking showing us a boot of little lower than double.

Adobe After Effects Tests

This software too seems to utilizes the benefits offered by the processing monsters in a smart way. Our tests showed us a performance boost of 60 % in rendering of a video file with Adobe After Effects.

Power Consumption

Now comes the tests that we are specifically interested in: Power Consumption. In terms of power consumption Intel I7 core is a "Powerful" Processor. The Intel I7 Core 965 EE consumed almost 337 Watts and 147 Watts in idle state when over clocked. This is definitely huge. The comparisons draws this fact: Though the power consumption of Intel I7 core at peak load is very high, it is very efficient under manageable load conditions or when it is idle.

Final Verdict

The I7 core 965 EE is undoubtedly the emperor and is not going to leave the throne of Fastest Processor on earth in near future. It has easily beaten Core 2 Quad Q9650 in all the tests which was once considered to the best Processor your money can buy and replaced it gracefully. The I7 cores were simply stunning and impressive in the tests specifically related to video editing and rendering showing us a bright future for itself in this industry. All the other processor looked old like the using Pentium II series in comparison with the I7 Cores. A matter of surprise is that the slowest processor in the I7 core series was easily able to beat the once fastest of all times Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650.

All these enhancements and performance boosts were possible due to two major changes that took place in the I7 Core. First i the inclusion of memory controller on the die itself and the use of the new QPI technology instead of the old fashioned FSB. And the Second is the use of Hyper Threading Technology to facilitate higher data transfer speeds between the cores.

Initially purchasing a Extreme PC may burn a hole in the pocket. The processor alone is priced at 1000 USD. And currently there is only one chipset supporting this monster, it is Intel X58. This too is priced heavily and may prove extremely expensive to get the benefits. Though Quality and Performance equals nothing, the ultimate decision is to be taken by you.

Overall, the processor fares well in all the conditions and for now has shown itself as the future of computing and you will not regret the money you spent after a Intel I7 Core 965 EE system.

Intel Celeron vs Pentium

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:17:00 +0000

The Celeron and Pentium Processors are two of Intel's best selling CPUs. They are found in a majority of home computer systems. When comparing the two processors it should be first understood that there are different types of Pentium processors - the original Pentium all the way to the Pentium 4 (the latest Pentium processor). The Celeron processors are more or less the same, although you will find them in a wide variety of speeds.

The Intel Celeron processor was always designed to be a low-cost alternative to the Pentium processor line. It is much like a car company that offers various priced cars from the luxury sedan to the economy compact. The Celeron is simply a downgraded Pentium, that almost anyone can afford (it is essentially the compact).

To begin, Celeron chips have a smaller L2 cache 9128kb compared with 512kb in the Pentium 4 Northwood, which translates into slower processing speeds. In fact, current Celerons have a clock speed limit of about 2.0GHz, where as the Pentium for is capable of speed in excess of 3.0GHz. In addition, the Pentium runs at a lower core voltage because it is more energy efficient (1.75V vs. 1.5V).

In summary, the Pentium 4 is more powerful than the most advanced Celeron processor on the market. However, Intel has planned it to be this way. Many applications will work just great with a Celeron processor, despite a little less power than the Pentium 4. It is a way to save a little cash when buying a new pc - but don't forget the saying "you get what you pay for." Celeron processors are of good Intel quality, but they will never be as good as the Pentium.

This Celeron vs. Pentium review was brought to you by SciNet Science and Technology Search Engine. SciNet is not affiliated with or specifically endorses the Celeron or Pentium processors or the manufacturer, Intel Corp. Please consult the Celeron and Pentium product information and configuration before you purchase either processor. It is also a good idea to seek other up-to-date product reviews and information as necessary.

Convertible Intel Classmate PC Mini Notebook Computer

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:56:00 +0000

Intel introduced its new Classmate PC design featuring convertible a display system that allows the user to turn the mini notebook computer into a tablet PC.

The new convertible Classmate PC model running with the low-power consuming Intel Atom processing technology is destined to the learning sector, specifically to primary school students, and brings a touch-sensitive user interface, the 180-degree swivel display and a rotational camera, while included in the Intel Learning Series, a new initiative gathering hardware, software and different services meant to improve the education in the emerging markets.

The previous version of the Classmate PC with clamshell-style design is currently used in the Magellan Initiative in Portugal for elementary school children, but Intel arranged to bring out a new design of the Magellan PC with enhanced reading and writing capabilities, larger display, more system memory and powerful high-speed Internet connectivity technologies such as 3G and WiMAX.

“Education is one of the best ways to improve the future for individuals, villages, or nations,” said Lila Ibrahim, general manager of the Intel Emerging Markets Platform Group, which developed the classmate PC reference design based on ethnographic research and supports the Intel Learning Series.

“There are 1.3 billion school-age children around the world and of those only 5 percent have access to a PC or the Internet. The IT industry has a huge opportunity to contribute to how technology can improve students’ learning and students’ lives. With our announcement today, Intel continues its long-standing commitment to advancing education through technology to transform lives around the world.”

Intel CULV Initiative

If you're not much into hardware, then let me tell you a very simple thing - as lower the voltage needed by a certain chip, the lower its temperature. When over clocking processors, increasing voltage is the last thing to do to ensure the system works properly, but considering the small chips used these days in notebooks, and the fact that most of us have more computing power than needed on the road, we need even lower voltage chips to get things right.

According to various sources, Intel's Consumer Ultra Low-Voltage (CULV) initiative will have as leaders two of the largest PC makers,probably Dell and HP, both expected to come up with tiny notebooks with screens between 11 and 13 inches, sometime during this summer.

These sources also claim that Acer and ASUS should be hurt by these new releases, since they have a solid percentage of their income coming from that part of the market.

Now, I only ask myself how similar to the ASUS Eee PC will be those new notebooks? The reason is obvious - you want to win a game, you have to play by its rules, and in the UMPC market, ASUS is the main player, as well as the one setting the rules.

Source:.laptopsarena.com

Intel Xeon X5570 and E5520 Gainestown Processors

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:54:00 +0000

A Pair of Intel Xeon X5570 Gainestown CPUs

Intel has officially announced the Xeon processor 5500 series, previously codenamed "Nehalem-EP," which is the server version of the the Intel Core i7 desktop processor. These new LGA1366 server processors that are derived from the Nehalem microarchitecture and are officially known to be Gainestown cores. These SMP-enabled parts feature a second 6.4GT/s QPI link to broker inter-CPU communication, which is the main difference between them and desktop parts.

As far as specs are concerned, the processors support tri-channel DDR3, 4MB or 8MB L3 cache, and an 80-130W TDP. The Intel Xeon processor 5500 series includes many of the same breakthrough technologies that radically improved system speed when the Core i7 desktop processor was launched.

Technologies such as Intel Turbo Boost Technology, Intel Hyper-Threading Technology, integrated power gates, and Next-Generation Intel Virtualization Technology (VT) improved through extended page tables, allow the system to adapt to a broad range of workloads.

Intel does not have just one or two of these processors coming out, they have ten Gainestown processors that are on the way to retail markets around the world. When it comes to pricing the Intel Xeon processor 5500 series ranges in price from $188 to $1,600 in quantities of 1,000. Major computer makers, such as Hewlett-Packard, Dell, and IBM will feature them in servers soon, if they have not already.

130W TDP / DDR3-1333:

Xeon W5580

95W TDP / DDR3-1333:

Xeon X5570
Xeon X5560
Xeon X5550

80W TDP / DDR3-1066:

Xeon E5540
Xeon E5530
Xeon E5520

80W TDP / DDR3-800:

Xeon E5506
Xeon E5504

80W TDP / DDR3-800 / Dual Core:

Xeon E5502

The Intel Xeon W5580 (BX80602W5580) is the fastest of the Gainestown processors as it operates at 3.20GHz with 8MB of L3 shared cache and a TDP of 130W. Due to this the processor has an MSRP right around $1600 USD each! While I would have loved to get my hands on a pair of Xeon W5580 processors, I was able to get a pair of Intel Xeon X5570 processors to benchmark!

With a clock frequency of 2.93GHz the Intel Xeon X5570 is still a force to be reckoned with and as you can see from the CPU-Z shot above. According to the CPU-Z readings and from what I could tell in the BIOS this 95W TDP processor runs at idle with 0.936V and at full load at 1.104V. These are awesome voltage numbers that are being seen from a recent D0 stepping processor.

With a full 8MB of L3 shared cache and a 6.4GT/s QPI link this processor should destroy any other processor that we have ever benchmarked here on Legit Reviews. It should be noted that on the Intel Xeon X5570 the processor operates at 2.93GHz with DDR3 memory speeds up to 1333MHz. Under certain conditions, Intel Turbo Boost Technology can provide operating frequencies up to 3.33 GHz, depending on the processor and system configuration. Let's take a look at Cinebench R10 and find out! I'll also be including the performance results of a pair of Intel Xeon E5520 Gainestown processors that operate at 2.26GHz with a full 8MB of shared L3 cache, but a lower QPI of just 5.86GT/s. Thanks to the lower QPI speed the DDR memory can only run at 1066MHz.

Source:legitreviews.com

Intel ATOM 230 versus VIA Nano L2100 - Battle of the Mini-ITX Platforms

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:24:00 +0000

The Battle of Mini-ITX Platforms

The Intel Atom and VIA Nano processors have been making a ton of noise in the market place as they are inexpensive, energy efficient and fit into sleek and sexy devices that consumers are looking for today. The day the VIA Nano processor was announced I was actually at Centaur Technologies down in Austin, Texas meeting with Gleen Henry where I got to see some Nano processors being produced right before my eyes. I had to wait nearly a month to get a VIA reference board in my hands with a VIA Nano processor, but it has been worth the wait. Since I have already covered the basics and introduced the Nano processor in my Centaur Technologies Tour article we will jump straight into things.

Armed with the VIA Nano processor and the Intel Atom processor, I can now do a direct performance comparison against two of the most talked about processors for 2008. The VIA Nano reference platform we were sent isn't a retail product, so keep that in mind while reading the rest of the article. The Intel Atom was tested on the D945GCLF, which is a retail product you can purchase today for $66 plus shipping.

Source:legitreviews.com

AMD Phenom II X3 705e and Phenom II X4 905e Processors

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:17:00 +0000

In June 2009, AMD silently launched a pair of energy efficient 65W TDP processors that didn't get that much attention from the press for some reason. Those two socket AM3 processors are called the AMD Phenom II X3 705e and Phenom II X4 905e. They both feature 2.5GHz clock frequencies, 200MHz bus with a 2000MHz HT link and memory support for both DDR2 (up to 1,066 MT/s) and DDR3 (up to 1,333 MT/s). With specifications like this, these processors are ideal for an Home Theater Personal Computer (HTPC) and any other application where noise and heat are a concern.

The first of the energy efficient Phenom II processors would be the budget friendly Phenom II X3 705e, which can be purchased for a cool $129.99. This is a triple-core processor that uses the 'Heka' core and designed by GLOBALFOUNDARIES at Fab 1 in Dresden, Germany using the 45nm DSL SOI (silicon-on-insulator) process. The processor runs at a very low 0.825V-1.25v for normal operation and has an overall clock frequency of 2.5GHz. The processor is multiplier locked with a 12.5x multiplier as it is NOT a Black Edition processor. If you want to overclock this processor you'll have to do that by increasing the 200MHz base clock. The CPUs HT link is set to 2000MHz and features the full cache levels, which are 512KB of L2 per core and 6mb of L3. Featuring a 65W TDP means that the Phenom II X3 705e processor at 2.5GHz has a TDP that is 30W lower than that of the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition processor at 2.8GHz.

Taking a closer look at the Phenom II X4 905e processor with CPU-Z 1.52.1 you can see that this is a quad-core processor based off the 'Deneb' core, but the clock frequency and multiplier remain the same. Basically, this processor has all the same features that the Phenom II X3 705e processor has with the addition of the extra core. This processor is ideal for those that are using multi-threaded applications for CPU intensive tasks as four cores will obviously run faster than one even though each core has less shared L3 Cache.

CPU Name	Cores	Clock	L2/L3 Cache	HT Bus	Socket	TDP	Price
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE	4	3.4GHz	2+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	140W	$245
AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE	4	3.2GHz	2+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	125W	$210
AMD Phenom II X4 945	4	3.0GHz	2+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	125W	$187
AMD Phenom II X4 940	4	3.0GHz	2+6MB	3600MHz	AM2+	125W	$196
AMD Phenom II X4 920	4	2.8GHz	2+6MB	3600MHz	AM2+	125W	$160
AMD Phenom II X4 905e	4	2.5GHz	2+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	65W	$201
AMD Phenom II X4 810	4	2.6GHz	2+4MB	4000MHz	AM3	95W	$181
AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE	3	2.8GHz	1.5+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	95W	$130
AMD Phenom II X3 710	3	2.6GHz	1.5+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	95W	$99
AMD Phenom II X3 705e	3	2.5GHz	1.5+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	65W	$130
AMD Phenom II X2 550	2	3.1GHz	1+6MB	4000MHz	AM3	80W	$103
AMD Athlon II X2 250	2	3.0GHz	2MB	4000MHz	AM3	65W	$76

The AMD Phenom II and Athlon II product stack is strong as usual with prices starting out at just $76 for the AMD Athlon II X2 250 and rising up to $245 for the Phenom II X4 965 BE. The AMD Phenom II X4 905e and Phenom II X3 705e come at a price premium since they are energy efficient parts. Based off current pricing, it would appear that the AMD Phenom II X4 905e and Phenom II X3 705e cost roughly $30-$40 more than a standard efficiency processor that has a slightly higher clock frequency.

That means you'll be paying more and getting less processing power, but on the flip side you'll get a lower electric bill and lower temperatures. If you are wanting to build a silent system of a HTPC, this decrease in clock frequency and the extra price is more than worth it in order to have a silent computer.

Intel UrbanMax

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:57:00 +0000

UrbanMax is a mobile computer prototype measuring just 1 inch thick, looking like a tablet PC but with a sliding keyboard and a 11.1-inch touch-sensitive wide display that tilts up to a laptop screen level.

It will feature the N-trig's DuoSense digitizer technology, characterized by a battery-free pen, 0 pressure capacitive touch, multi-touch functionality, and low power consumption.
"N-trig's DuoSense technology allows OEMs and ODMs to produce innovative new mobile and wireless computing devices that are not currently available on the market today," said Amihai Ben-David, CEO of N-trig. "We are excited to be collaborating with Intel and other Tier 1 players who are recognizing our breakthrough and innovative technology."

The touch and pen digitizer is located in front of any size LCD display, and is thin, lightweight and transparent, supporting Windows XP Tablet and Windows Vista operating systems support, with on-board upgradeable firmware. N-trig created the battery-free electrostatic stylus providing the power source from the magnetic energy produced by the excitation coil located in the digitizer, while the user can access the tablet either using finger touch or this stylus. The surface is a capacitive sensing system featuring fast response time, drag and drop, scroll, flicks and select.

The precise input is accomplished using palm rejection capability, which differentiates between unwanted contact and intentional input.

You can also use multiple fingers to manipulate files, thanks to the multi-touch support, which allows for zooming, panning, rotate and double-tap via the Hands-on Gestures technology.
Source:laptopsarena.com

Intel looks beyond PCs, eyes new segments

noreply@blogger.com (Updating Den) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:54:00 +0000

The future is in personal computing, not just personal computers, according to Intel CEO Paul Otellini who said his company wasbetting on new market segments such as netbooks, handhelds and consumer electronics to drive growth with PC sales likely to be “flat or slightly up” this year.

Intel, whose range of microprocessors power almost 80% of computers worldwide, also announced that it

has built working chips that pack 2.9 billion transistors in an area the size of a finger nail.

Delivering his keynote at the Intel Developers’ Forum 2009, Mr Otellini also launched an Intel Atom Developer Programme inviting third party programmers to create new programs for its Atom line of microprocessors. Atom powers net books — bare-bone PCs with small screens for net surfing and word processing — a segment, which Mr Otellini said was holding up the whole computer market now.

“We have the worst recession in 70 years. The netbook filled the gap,” he said, adding that Atom will eventually cover connected devices. “At the highest level, every electronic device is likely to be connected to the Internet at some point in time. And we think the architecture to do this, obviously, is Atom,” he said.

Netbooks outpaced the two other popular devices in the consumer market — Apple’s iPhone and the Nintendos gaming console Wii — in the past three quarters, he added. In-vehicle infotainment systems, which clocked a 17% growth rate in the year when the automotive industry slipped to a recession, are another growth area for Intel.

Mr Otellini said that a company that Intel has been working with over three years, Harman Becker, has secured two major design contracts for Atom-based systems. “Daimler will put it into their S-Class and C-Class series starting in 2012, and BMW is developing a cross-platform, which means it goes across all their models, as an option for 2012 and beyond,” the Intel CEO said.

Intel has also begun factory production of its 32 nanometre chip, and the latest one — the 22nm one — continues to deliver the promise of Moore’s Law: smaller transistors, improved performance and lower cost, said Sean Maloney, Intel’s executive vice-president.

“The rapidly increasing number of transistors and processor instructions we add have made possible the integration of more and more capabilities and features within our processors. This has driven an incredible amount of innovation throughout the industry, with the real winners being the consumers, gamers and businesses,” he said.