<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property Directions</title>
	
	<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com</link>
	<description>TechRoadmap discusses Intellectual Property issues from a non-legal perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IntellectualPropertyDirections" /><feedburner:info uri="intellectualpropertydirections" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>IntellectualPropertyDirections</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FIntellectualPropertyDirections" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FIntellectualPropertyDirections" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FIntellectualPropertyDirections" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Don’t think patents are worth it? Think again!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IntellectualPropertyDirections/~3/IV_Q0QDdrUs/</link>
		<comments>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/02/01/dont-think-patents-are-worth-it-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[IP strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patent Strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patent value]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patent value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description>While admittedly a very special case, funded on both sides by very deep pockets, 1.7 BILLION dollars isn&amp;#8217;t chump change to anyone. See http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2010/02/01/daily1.html.
One thing this settlement reinforces is the advice I always give clients: you only know you have a valuable patent when someone wants to copy your invention - either by licensing or [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IntellectualPropertyDirections/~4/IV_Q0QDdrUs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/02/01/dont-think-patents-are-worth-it-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/02/01/dont-think-patents-are-worth-it-think-again/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Stitch in time, saves $9000</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IntellectualPropertyDirections/~3/3dU2HxPw3JI/</link>
		<comments>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/01/21/a-stitch-in-time-saves-9000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom to Operate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IP strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obviousness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prior publication]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[non-patent prior art]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prior art search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description>I&amp;#8217;m not much of a seamstress, so I can&amp;#8217;t testify to how many stitches are saved by repairing a tear as soon as it happens, but I do know that investing in a prior art search can easily save you from wasting ten or more times as much on an application for an un-patentable invention. And [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IntellectualPropertyDirections/~4/3dU2HxPw3JI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/01/21/a-stitch-in-time-saves-9000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/01/21/a-stitch-in-time-saves-9000/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Enabled but not described?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IntellectualPropertyDirections/~3/wefjXnhlUH8/</link>
		<comments>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/01/11/enabled-but-not-described/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Enablement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patent Prosecution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Written description]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[enabling description]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description>In a seeming paradox, in the magic world of patent filings it is possible to &amp;#8220;enable&amp;#8221; your invention - that is, explain to someone of skill in your field how to make or use your invention - and yet not fully meet the written description requirement for obtaining a patent (or at least patent coverage [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IntellectualPropertyDirections/~4/wefjXnhlUH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/01/11/enabled-but-not-described/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/01/11/enabled-but-not-described/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
