<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>International Affairs</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/" />
   
   <id>tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/internationalaffairs//31</id>
   <updated>2007-10-19T02:19:43Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/InternationalAffairs" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry>
   <title>Russian economy forecast: Sunny and clear</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/2007/10/russian_economy_forecast_sunny.html" />
   <id>tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/internationalaffairs//31.2313</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-19T01:58:40Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-19T02:19:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Watch out, world. Russia's back, better than ever, and &amp;#8212; says the Deutsche Bank CEO &amp;#8212; you never saw it coming. "One of the things I am always struck by is how the history of prediction in the West about...</summary>
   <author>
      <name />
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/">
      <![CDATA[Watch out, world. Russia's back, better than ever, and &#8212; says the Deutsche Bank CEO &#8212; you never saw it coming. 
<p>
"One of the things I am always struck by is how the history of prediction in the West about what's going to happen in Russia has been so poor," Charles Ryan, chief county officer and CEO of Deutsche Bank, one of the largest investment banks in the world, told a crowd at the Heritage Foundation today. 
<p>
But he wasn't there to whine. "No once could have predicted in 1998 in the very dark days of the utter collapse of the Russian economy that we would be sitting here today with such an optimistic nature about the current state of the Russian macroeconomic story," he said. 
<p>
Russia will be the fifth-largest economy in the world in 2020, with a $2 trillion economy in 2010, thanks to its booming economy, says Mr. Ryan.
<p>
Not everything's perfect yet, though. He talked of Russian officials keeping half their country's GDP in cash, claiming distrust of the Russian bureaucracy not to invest it "wisely," adding that these "officials" would rather invest it by engaging Western business and getting Russia involved in private partnerships.
<p>
He criticized Russia's President Vladimir Putin's tax reform program passed last year that required Russians pay a 13% flat tax, saying it makes it difficult for anybody to live "independently, economically."
<p>
Andrew C. Kuchins, a political scientist and director and senior fellow for the Russia and Eurasia Program, agreed that there has been an economic revolution taking place in Russia for over the past eight years.
<p>
"This transformation of Russia from an economic basket case to emerging market powerhouse is very much underappreciated," Mr. Kuchins said, calling the country "polarized much like the Tale of Two Cities."
<p>
The way some were hinting to possible American-Russian collaborations on investing, it seemed that traces of the Cold War had all but melted. 
<p>
"There are going to be important steps for the [American and Russian] governments to take to ensure that the private initiative is allowed to make its contribution where it can," said Ambassador James F. Collins, senior associate and director of the Russia and Eurasia Program. 
<p>
"I hope that our engagement with the Russians will continue to make the point that developing the commercial relationship with the business communities in Russia and vice-versa is an important strategic interest for the United States. It will make the relationship more stable."
<p>
<i> &#8212; Andrew Richards, intern, The Washington Times </i>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Female Circumcision</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/2007/08/female_circumcision.html" />
   <id>tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/internationalaffairs//31.1552</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-29T22:40:40Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-29T22:42:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Egypt will finally strengthen the penalties against female genital mutilation, a practice believed by Egyptian Muslims and Christians to be a religious duty. The recent death of a couple of young girls due to the procedure has brought renewed attention...</summary>
   <author>
      <name />
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/">
      <![CDATA[Egypt will finally strengthen the penalties against female genital mutilation, a practice believed by Egyptian Muslims and Christians to be a religious duty. The recent death of a couple of young girls due to the procedure has brought renewed attention to the problem.


The practice was banned in 1997, but doctors were allowed to operate "in exceptional cases," <a href="http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070812-121054-9163r">wrote the Middle East Times.</a> Which begs the question, what are these exceptional cases?! If there is no medical or religious basis for this procedure, is there any reason for it?


People mainly perform it for religious reasons. So the most important and effective "ban" should come from the main religious figures. With both the Muslim Sheikh of Al-Azhar and the Coptic Patriarch in Egypt declaring that the practice has no foundation in the religious text, one should hope that it would eventually die out. 


<i>-- Gihane Askar, The Washington Times</i>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Lifting the veil</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/2007/08/lifting_the_veil.html" />
   <id>tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/internationalaffairs//31.1551</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-29T22:36:02Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-29T22:38:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>If you've always been curious about the mysterious world of Saudi women, you can finally take a glance at their intimate lives. Just pick up the recently translated (from Arabic to English) novel "Girls of Riyadh." The book was written...</summary>
   <author>
      <name />
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/">
      <![CDATA[If you've always been curious about the mysterious world of Saudi women, you can finally take a glance at their intimate lives. Just pick up the recently translated (from Arabic to English) novel "<a href="http://www.rajaa.net/v2/english.htm">Girls of Riyadh</a>." The book was written by a young Saudi women who managed to publish it in Beirut because it was first banned in Saudi Arabia.


Now that the book is available worldwide, and in Saudi, it actually reflects a bigger trend. There is apparently an increase in the number of published books and women authors coming out of Saudi Arabia. Many of them deal with the usual suspects: sex, marriage and social life of women and men. Among them is "The Others," a book about lesbianism authored by a woman, which is still banned in Saudi Arabia. 


The trend is here to stay because once you open the line of communication between people, no one likes to give up their right to speak up -- or write it down. 

<i>-- Gihane Askar, The Washington Times</i>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A mistake or a trick? </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/2007/08/a_mistake_or_a_trick.html" />
   <id>tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/internationalaffairs//31.1548</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-29T21:54:32Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-29T21:55:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Another Iranian newspaper was shut down recently for publishing a certain article. While this is not unusual in Iran (the same newspaper was shut down before), the reason this time is an interview with an expatriate Iranian woman living in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name />
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/internationalaffairs/">
      <![CDATA[Another Iranian newspaper was shut down recently for publishing a certain article. While this is not unusual in Iran (the same newspaper was shut down before), the reason this time is an interview with an expatriate Iranian woman living in Canada. She was labeled a "counter-revolutionary homosexual," reported the <a href="http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070806-082027-9928r"> Middle East Times.</a>


The paper Monday published a front-page apology for the interview, saying that it had been "unaware of this person's personal traits" and would in future "avoid such people and movements."


Of course homosexuality is considered illegal and immoral in Iran and apparently homosexual sex is punishable by death. And since the interviewee is the editor of a web site for Iranian lesbian and gay issues, the reaction of the authorities was expected. So why did the paper publish the interview and then apologize for it. Was it really an oversight or is that the only way around the censorship? 


<i>-- Gihane Askar, The Washington Times</i>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
