<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2916718880344769106</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Comment</category><category>Insurance</category><category>Readings</category><title>Investing In Indian Equity</title><description>All about my experience in the exciting World of Investment and Personal Finance and about the readings that I liked.</description><link>http://investinginindianequity.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Kaushik)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2916718880344769106.post-7736270017174754604</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-06-07T18:03:12.847-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Insurance</category><title>In defense of ULIPs:</title><atom:summary type="text">I agree wholeheartedly with what Devangshu Datta writes about ULIPs in Value Research:     In themselves, Ulips are not fraudulent; it&#39;s just that investors can get far better deals. So this is a classic case of “buyer beware”. If investors insist on buying Ulips, there isn&#39;t much more that can be done since there are already ample warning signs in the public space. It is also easy to understand </atom:summary><link>http://investinginindianequity.blogspot.com/2010/06/in-defense-of-ulips.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Kaushik)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2916718880344769106.post-3502938568006100112</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-11T21:30:51.280-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Comment</category><title>A Wonderful Idea</title><atom:summary type="text">Economic Times threw up a wonderful idea in it&#39;s editorial on Nov 10, 2009.   They argue      The government must mandate the Employees&amp;#8217; Provident Fund Organisation, which is trying to computerise its operations, to not duplicate effort and waste resources, and, instead, adopt the Central Record-keeping Agency (CRA) of the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) that services the New </atom:summary><link>http://investinginindianequity.blogspot.com/2009/11/wonderful-idea.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Kaushik)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2916718880344769106.post-4117469489611843838</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-11T21:11:45.152-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Readings</category><title>India: The Rolls Royce: Devina Mehra</title><atom:summary type="text">I was spring cleaning my book case and found a few magazine clippings. They are columns from long ago that I liked. Tried googling for the stories but nothing turned up. So thought about sharing them one by one:  The first one is a column written by Devina Mehra, owner of First Global. This Column appeared in the Business World issue dated 1st November, 1999.     The western press, even the </atom:summary><link>http://investinginindianequity.blogspot.com/2009/11/india-rolls-royce-devina-mehra.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Kaushik)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>