itiswhatisaid

Corporate Person hood.

2012-06-17T17:15:00.003-05:00

When I think about the United States of America, and everything that is truly good, beautiful, and worth saving here. I think of beautiful places, like Colorado, upstate New York, and the diverse scenery in California. When I think of the United States of America, and think of things that are utterly despicable, unjustifiably evil, corrupt, deadly, dangerous to all living things, and all un corrupted places - I think of American Corporations, like Monsanto, Halliburton, General Electric, DuPont, DynCorp, Blackwater/Xe, and more.

What is it about these corporations that is evil? After all, aren't they only selling a product that people want?

Well, yes and no - most often, and rather simplistically, one could say that corporations just produce and sell a product that people want. This isn't always true, however, and continuously we see the rise of corporations like Monsanto. Monsanto does not make one single solitary safe product. Every single product created by Monsanto is detrimental to the health of not only the person who bought it, but for persons that have yet to be born. Indeed, Monsanto has one not well hidden priority - preventing anyone outside of it's stockholder's interests - from ever being born.

Halliburton - that's a corporation that produces a product that people want, but it's not that simple, and never was, and never will be. We've invaded Iraq after what was likely a false flag attack on America. . .so that Bush Jr. could pretend to be his daddy, and because tricky Dick Cheney took a FIFTY TWO MILLION dollar severance package to run as Vice President. Halliburton rebuilt the Iraqi oil fields, and Monsanto destroyed the Iraqi agriculture industry, probably forever.

But there's more! Let's say that I'm an air conditioning repair guy, and you are a plumber - so you repair someone's plumbing, break the a/c, and give em my card! That's just "good business," ain't it swell?

British Petroleum isn't an American Corporation, but eleven days before their destruction of the American Gulf of Mexico, Halliburton bought the company that would be making more money from cleaning up the gulf than British Petroleum would have made from selling the intentionally spilled oil. Oh, I can't prove that it was intentional - but it would be far harder to prove that any of that WASN'T intentional. It's abundantly clear to us all that the wholesale of America is underway, and that the intention is to eat our karma. The funny thing is that these Corporate Billionaires that don't pay taxes at all, and use YOUR taxes via the U.S. Government to create more and more REASONS for YOU to pay MORE and them to pay NOTHING in taxes.

Corporate billionaires, executives, stockholders, and employees are not immune to the laws of God, and neither are they protected from what is often just referred to as "karma." You can not buy your way out of the things that you have done. You will be called before the King for your deeds. So will I. Some things really ARE grand.

Greed Is Good!

Greed Produces Poverty

	A Framework for Understanding Poverty Amazon Price: $14.19 List Price: $25.00
	Teaching with Poverty in Mind: What Being Poor Does to Kids' Brains and What Schools Can Do about It Amazon Price: $15.18 List Price: $23.95
	The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time Amazon Price: $5.59 List Price: $17.00
	Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty Amazon Price: $9.98 List Price: $26.99
	The Rich And The Rest Of Us: A Poverty Manifesto Amazon Price: $6.32 List Price: $12.00
	Those Shoes Amazon Price: $3.61 List Price: $6.99
	Problems of Poverty Amazon Price: $9.99
	When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty Without Hurting the Poor... and Yourself Amazon Price: $14.00 List Price: $21.98
	Poverty, Battered Women, and Work in U.S. Public Policy (Interpersonal Violence) Amazon Price: $27.46 List Price: $35.00
	Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional Approaches Fail (BK Currents (Paperback)) Amazon Price: $10.00 List Price: $20.95

But Greed Is NOT Good.

But greed is not good. Greed is inherently and totally evil. Greed is Monsanto selling Farmers in India something that they THOUGHT that they wanted. Greed is Monsanto sending Bollywood actors to defraud illiterate Indian Farmers of their lands by selling them mutant GMO seeds of death, when what they had was the perfect seeds, evolved over millions of years, perfectly suited to the lands that they had. Greed is Monsanto, and greed Is murder. Monsanto, and every product that I know of that they make - is toxic to humans. Greed is lies for approved "safety" of Monsanto products. Greed is General Motors, and all other car manufacturers not producing cars that get better gas mileage, even though they have the technology to do so - because Greed is Corporate executives trying to unite the world under one government of greed, and so gasoline prices stay high, and we burn more and more of it, or pour it into the ocean, because the Greed of Halliburton executives and British Petroleum executives is more deadly than the greed of Gulf fisherman.

America is the land of Greed, and America is for sale to the highest bidders. The cancer of Greed is everywhere you look. Campaign contributions and lobbyist make "legal" bribes to outright buy politicians and American Corporations like Monsanto - the Biotech firm that pushes products that absolutely nobody educated about those products could or would ever want - unless they wanted to poison someone - also own their own private armies, Blackwater/Xe. In Florida recently, the poor were sold as slaves to the state government so that the Governor's wife could make money from drug testing their urine. I'd imagine she snorts up the cocaine that is so easily available to her there, and laughs with Satanic glee.

How wise - to think that drug use is abhorrent among the unemployed or needy - and that somehow, someone who uses drugs - doesn't need to eat. This is the wisdom of GREED.

Corporate "persons" Can DROWN OUT Free Speech.

See all 2 photos

Source: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/free%20...

Free Speech.

Freedom isn't really free, and it never, ever was. Freedom costs you a lot of money in the United Corporations of America; and our Supreme Court Justices even dare to call this "free speech." These so called Corporations as persons can literally spend billions of dollars to drown out the speech of you, me, and everyone else. Oh, I can post my thoughts on the internet, and the Department of Homeland Insecurity can put me on it's watch list for having the audacity of hoping that I can say what I want in opposition of "Corporate Persons" who's free speech I oppose - because CORPORATIONS AREN'T PERSONS, and because America is a wholesale whorehouse, and everything is for sale.

I'd rather have bacteria in my food and purchased from a street vendor than to ever see the damned local police department try to intimidate some women selling tamales on the side of the road ever again. All the while, our grocery stores are filling the shelves with mutant foods, and totally unsafe preservatives and additives that our Food and Drug Administration deems "safe" for human consumption - and corporations are making inroads on the idea that you and I shouldn't be able to grow even our own vegetables in our gardens. Why? Because Corporate Persons hood, Free Speech, and everything that was once good about the United States of America has been absolutely corrupted by Orwellian double speaking United Corporate Whores of America from politicians, to Supreme Court Justices, on down to every single one of us that looks the other way and says nothing while this continues to go on, and on, and on.

Business and State

The founding fathers of the United States of America had a great idea in separating Church and State. The founding fathers, however, were unable to foresee that the Usury system implemented in this nation by the Rothschild banking cartel would wholly corrupt America in cooperation with the Rockefeller family destroying the once proud charters that corporations must fulfill and prove that they served the public good.

Separating Church and State is not enough. Separating State and Business must now become the new mantra. The United Corporations of America is a failed and failing state, and will not be able to continue in existence at the rate of wholesale that we are seeing now.

United Corporations of America!

Source: http://humboldtherald.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/...

Corporate Person Hood = Corporate Fascism.

Corporate personhood wins big in US Supreme Court The Humboldt Herald
As this decision clearly demonstrates, corporate personhood is not an inconsequential legal technicality. Consider this the Supreme Court ruled that a corporation was a legal person with 14th Amendment protections before they granted full. . .

	The Doctrine of Fascism Amazon Price: $6.00 List Price: $11.95
	Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (New in Paper) Amazon Price: $15.19 List Price: $19.95
	Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America Amazon Price: $68.36 List Price: $95.00
	Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America Amazon Price: $24.00
	The Corporate State In Action Italy Under Fascism Amazon Price: $14.68 List Price: $23.75
	Democracy, Fascism and the New World Order (Societas) Amazon Price: $12.39 List Price: $17.90

Corporate Person Hood - The Agenda

Now, anyone can dance and sing, and shout that Corporations are just groups of persons that provide a product that we all want, but that's someone who only wants to see what they want to see. Nobody REALLY wants to know the truth of the matter, and the truth of the matter is that we've started wars across the Earth for our corporations. Nobody can argue that tremendous profits were raped from the peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan, and nobody can prove that they had anything to do with that false flag attack in the U.S. Nobody can argue that oil companies are NOT making record profits year after year, and nobody can argue that the gulf oil spill clean up company owned by Halliburton made even greater profits from that still.

Nobody can argue that post false flag September the Eleventh - American Citizens have undergone ever increasing stresses on their personal finances. Nobody can argue that American citizens in that time have NOT lost more and more of their Constitutional freedoms, and that Corporations are to blame.

The agenda is Global Government, and Enslavement of us all. We are meant to feel guilty for the environment - but the United States Military waging wars for Corporate "persons" is the single largest polluter in the entire world, followed ONLY by the corporations that it wages war FOR.

That a Corporation is a "person" or should ever be considered one - is so Orwellian and outright retarded that I'll not dignify that in any way, EVER.

The Only Solution.

Back to thinking of what is beautiful - and I'm reminded of the immense and timeless beauty of all things Tolkien, and who can forget the battle with the Balrog at the pass in the mines of Moria?

The only way that this nation will survive is to destroy it's mass media, destroy it's Rothschild and Rockefeller Usury bases system of debt and occult currency. Get back to real values, solid families, and learning to love PEACE. Business and Government MUST become completely separated. There is nothing righteous or remotely "good" about making a profit. Capitalism is a game of winners and losers, but our lives are not games.

I'm afraid that as of now, the old wizard and the demon are fighting it out in the pits of hell.

Integrity Versus Corporations.

Rules For The Gunman

2012-04-23T08:31:00.000-05:00

Rules For The Gunman

1). Don't carry the gun to make you a man. Carry because you are in fact a man.

2). Always carry your gun regardless of social pressures

3). If you can't physically carry a gun, always have a knife.

4). Whenever you carry a gun, also carry a knife...and some spare ammunition.

5). Carry the gun you can use best regardless of social fashion

6). Make sure you are good with that gun through continual and obsessive practice

7). Don't bluff or threaten with the gun. If you pull it, be certain you are justified and willing to use it.

8). Using it means shooting the other man or men in the chest and/or the face. Yes, it means killing.

9). If you can avoid having to shoot, it is a good thing, but do not second guess yourself once it has begun.

11). To facilitate the former, do not go to stupid places with stupid people to do stupid things at stupid times.

12). If you are involved in such activities, take a team with you....and rifles.

13). The default should be to mind your own business.

14). The only time minding your own business is superseded by getting involved is if what you see shocks the conscience of humanity and needs to be stopped.

15). The amount of violence you can justify and the number of rules you can break is directly proportionate to the level of evil displayed by your adversary.

16). Never apologize for using violence. Not only is it indicative of weakness but also of a lack of moral standing.

Dumbed Down America-A Short Study Of a Successful and Stystematic Process.

2012-04-16T14:24:00.001-05:00

1857: The National Education Association is founded as a professional association. The U.S. Congress charters it in 1906, and the IRS declares it a union in 1978. Largely bankrolled by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, the NEA today is the nation's chief education lobby. It ranks amoung the ten largest political action committees according to the most recently filed Federal Election Commissions reports. With more than 2 million members, the NEA creates regulations and certifies teachers to carry out it's radical goal.

I'm going to lay some of those "radical goals" out for you shortly, read on. It's important for you to note that David Rockefeller, and now his son David Rockefeller Jr. are the principle pimps for this organization-if you doubt for a second that the Rockefellers are Illuminists, and all out traitors to the United States, favoring a new world order, then just google a bit.

1946: The Teacher and World Government, by former editor of the NEA Journal Joy Elmer Morgan, is published. He says, "In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation. At the very heart of all agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession."

Keep those thoughts in mind, and strap yourself in.

1947: NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should "teach about the various proposals that have been made for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government."

Again, have a seat and strap your patriotic self in-the sorry state of affairs that we call public schools in America will be explained.

1964: Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes progressive educators as a revolutionary cabal engaged in a systematic attempt to undermine society's traditions and beliefs.

I think this guy was "in the know."

1968: Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking about a New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr., asserts, "The World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline-world order-into educational curricula throughout the world, and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into mass media again on a worldwide level."

I'd say that plan has been a success-to the detriment of all Americans.

1972: Dr. Chester M. Pierce of Harvard University in the keynote address to the Association for Childhood Education International in Denver, Colorado., states, ". . .every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a seperate entity. . . It's up to you to make all of these sick children well. . . ."

So basically, a Harvard professor says that your sick if you love your parents and your country! Glad nobody spent the money to send me to a place with those ideals.

Now I'm going to backtrack to 1964

1964: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states, "A large part of what we call good teaching, is the teacher's ability to attain effective objectives through challenging the student's fixed beliefs." His Outcome Based Education method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago schools. In five years time students test scores plummeted to the point that outraged parents protested. OBE leaves a trail of idiocy regardless of what they rename it, or where they try it. It is a crucial system for globalists, however, and the dumbing down of America was it's intent, and purpose-it didn't happen by accident.

Thanks, you all! Sleep Tight!

The Dumbing Down Of America Is Completely Intentional.

Why the United States Is Destroying Its Education System | Truthout
Slaves do not think critically, slaves obey their masters.

Intentionally Corrupted "history"

'Rewriting History'
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/rewriting_history.htm
An excerpt from William T. Stills New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies.

In America, the task of Masonry to redefine the values which would be taught to the next generation was prodigious indeed, requiring a huge investment. The plan operated for many years, however, before being discovered.

In 1954, a special Congressional Committee investigated the interlocking web of tax-exempt foundations to see what impact their grants were having on the American psyche. The Committee stumbled onto the fact that some of these groups had embarked upon a gigantic project to rewrite American history and incorporate it into new school text books.

Norman Dodd, the committee's research director found, in the archives of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace the following remarkable statement of purpose:

The only way to maintain control of the population was to obtain control of education in the U.S. They realized this was a prodigious task so they approached the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that they go in tandem and that portion of education which could be considered as domestically oriented be taken over by the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which was oriented to International matters be taken over by the Carnegie Endowment.

The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to take on the domestic portion of the task. The purpose of all this interest in history, was of course to rewrite it. Dodd explained:

They decided that the success of this program lay in the manner in which American history was to be presented. They then approached four of the then most-prominent historians -- such as Mary and Charles Beard -- with the suggestion that they alter the manner in which they were accustomed to presenting the subject. They [were] turned down flat, so...they decided they [had] to build a coterie of historians of their own selection.

The Guggenheim Foundation agreed to award fellowships to historians recommended by the Carnegie Endowment. Gradually, through the 1920's, they assembled a group of twenty promising young academics, and took them to London. There they briefed them on what was expected of them when they became professors of American history. That twenty were the nucleus of what was eventually to become the American Historical Association.

In 1928, the American Historical Association was granted $400.000 by the Carnegie Endowment to write a seven volume study on the direction the nation was to take. The thrust of these books, according to Dodd was that "the future of this country belongs to collectivism and humanism."

Dodd concluded from his study that these tax-exempt foundations -- by virtue of the fact that they pay for these studies -- lay at the heart of a group determined to destroy the United States.

These educational changes were applied very gradually, so as not to alarm the general American populace, but they have been documented. This in tandem with state and federal court decisions in the later half of the twentieth century, has proven very effective at achieving this goal. Masonry is still very active in the area of education. An excellent book on the subject is Paul A. Fisher's Behind The Lodge Door.

Perhaps the greatest advantage the forces of the New World Order posses is that they know they are at war. America, at best, only suspects it. How the New World Order will be manifested in the next century cannot be predicted, but one thing is clear: secret societies will continue to masquerade as benign, humanitarian organizations and to attack critics who penetrate their disguise. (William T. Stills New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies. pg. 180-181)

"we don't need no education"

Buy Books About Education on Amazon.com!!

	The Death and Life of theGreat American School System:How Testing and Choice AreUndermining Education Amazon Price: $9.64 List Price: $16.99
	Democracy And Education Amazon Price: $9.99
	What Great Teachers DoDifferently: 14 Things ThatMatter Most Amazon Price: $9.00 List Price: $29.95
	Public School Education Amazon Price: $20.42 List Price: $35.75
	Confronting the Challenges ofParticipatory Culture: MediaEducation for the 21st Century(The John D. and Catherine T.MacArthur Foundation Reportson Digital Media and Learning) Amazon Price: $7.49 List Price: $14.00
	The Flat World and Education:How America's Commitment toEquity Will Determine OurFuture (MulticulturalEducation) Amazon Price: $13.64 List Price: $23.95
	Teaching Outside the Box: Howto Grab Your Students By TheirBrains Amazon Price: $14.26 List Price: $24.95
	The End of Education:Redefining the Value of School Amazon Price: $7.76 List Price: $15.00

InfoBarrel Ate My Article. Beer Requested

2012-04-15T20:19:00.000-05:00

I'm forever a web scribbler. Well, that minus the forever bit. I won't be scribbling on the web forever, per se - but likely I will be for a while.

What I'm saying is that I'm spending a ton of my time for very low income...writing on the web. I've never much had anything remotely "viral" - but I've had some very good and steady success writing about things within a couple genres.

Probably, the genres of success I've dipped my toes in...are the least viral or lowest paying niches or genres on the entire world wide web -animals, and folk music, or folk music instrumentation.

When I started my non career as a web scribbler in earnest, I started on Hubpages.com, and there is where all the best of my work is. I'm not saying I don't work hard to create good web content on the other sites I write on, what I'm saying is that Hubpages pays me daily...every day I get the cash to buy a beer or two...three at the most...from Hubpages.com.

After I'd started writing on Hubpages, I realized very quickly that a man named Sunforged was the single most intelligent person on the entire website in regards to web marketing, website building, web page promotion, and earning a very good living on the web. Sunforged advised me via his Hubpages profile to join InfoBarrel, and so I did.

I like InfoBarrel quite a lot, but I don't like it as much as I like Hubpages - and the reason for this is simple: Hubpages is a freer format that better suits my style, and it has a much larger community of writers than any other single site on the web.

Wordpress is nice - but the notion that I should pay in money in order to monetize my two to five dollars per day's work...is obscene, so I've got non monetized Wordpress, but regardless, Wordpress doesn't have much of a COMMUNITY vibe to it, and so it goes.

InfoBarrel does have a bit of community to it, and I've increasingly noticed that despite the very low traffic I get on InfoBarrel - my Google Adsense earnings there increase steadily.

You'll never get rich by spinning or outright stealing my web scribbles - but you'll hopefully get a headache should you bother debating with me online. I kinda think I'll hand you yours in a handbasket, and the entire audience will see it.

Not that I've got a big ego - I've got a big mouth...big difference.

Anyway - InfoBarrel's software screwed up royally this morning, or maybe they just didn't want me saying what I'd already typed out seven hundred or so words of...my article went "poof" into the cyber ether.

I mean....I mean....I spend well over 40 hours a week online on various and sundry websites writing, reading, and promoting - and arguing my views, and then....I put some effort into something, knowing it is important to someone out there, knowing that I'll likely never afford Heineken beer with it...and it just disappears?

I really need a fine Netherlands Brew Now!

The Civilian Inmate Labor Program In The United States Of America

2012-04-07T21:16:00.000-05:00

Posse Comitatus and the Federal Reserve.

Perhaps you don't know, but you should; the Federal Reserve is not Federal, and there has never been any sort of reserve. Basically, it's an institution run by the Rothschild crime syndicate, along with close pals the Rockefellers; and they print money out of thin air based on nothing to suite whatever desires they might be having on any particular day. As their criminal bank fails, and fail it must, certainly situations here in America will become rather dire. But don't worry about it too much, Jackson, Lincoln, Garfield, and Kennedy all were either assassinated for wanting to get rid of the influence of wealthy European bankers, or, as in the case of Jackson, only "almost" got assassinated.

On June 18, 1878 the Posse Comitatus act was passed into law to prevent the United States Military from legally ever engaging American Citizens in any way on non Federal soil. Clearly the document in the vital link at the bottom is in violation of thePosse Comitatus act. How can this be? You can thank George W. Bush, and it's all too telling that the link directly below from our department of homeland insecurity declares, falsely, that Posse Comitatus is a "myth," but by all means, research it for yourself.

Bernake Era Americans Have Been Swindled Out Of TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS - Bernake's Loyalty is Israel, and Rothschild, and NEVER Was America.

It's All In The Blue Link Below

Written in black and white and for all to see in the link below is the United States civilian inmate labor program, a program for disaster relief when all of the world that you now know has come to an end. This is a legitimate document, and if you can prove that it is not, then please get busy with your long cut and paste. Freedom has never been free, in fact, you have to be really, really rich; and it's advisable that you stock up on canned foods and ammunition starting right now, and preferably yesterday.

Basically, what this all comes down to is that citizens killing each other for food simply will not do, we need you productive, so that the very wealthy can remain so; it's only common sense. Oh, and soldiers who should not legally be able to act on American soil rank higher in the food chain than you do too. If you are too old to be productive, then perhaps some end of life counseling will be provided for you, who knows?

This Is The Plan To Enslave American People.

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/r210_35.pdf

Things to stock up on.

In the event of a collapse of the criminal federal reserve internationalist banking cartel system, there a number of things that one should stock up on. I'd like to include armor piercing bullets and kevlar in the list, but alas, those things are unavailable in the normal legal markets. Foods such as Ramen Noodles, and all canned goods are a great place to start. Shotguns and shotgun shells for hunting are another wonderful idea. Seeds for gardening that do not bare the foul stench of Monsanto is another wonderful thing, but then again, our criminal government is even debating if you, in fact, even have the right to grow your own food; so perhaps hunting is a better alternative, and foraging, pre-civilization style may become a reality once again.Compound bows and arrows may be the way to go after corrupt governments decide to make us subjects rather than citizens by confiscating our guns.

	Barnett Outdoors JuniorArchery 28-Inch Arrows (3Pack) Amazon Price: $7.66 List Price: $11.81
	12 Aluminum High Impact Arrows Amazon Price: $2.18 List Price: $9.00
	Allen Company 26-InchFiberglass Youth Arrows (3Pack) Amazon Price: $9.19 List Price: $1,199.00

	Bear Archery Right HandWarrior III Bow Set Amazon Price: $89.95 List Price: $159.99
	Crosman Elkhorn Jr. CompoundBow Amazon Price: $48.38 List Price: $64.99
	Bear Archery Right Hand Brave3 Bow Set (Black) Amazon Price: $54.95 List Price: $89.99

Amber, A Cautionary Tale Of Surveillance By Corrupt Governments, Like OURS via NSA Project Echelon

2012-02-29T18:47:00.001-06:00

Amber-a cautionary tale.

The morning alarm sounds with tiny urgency. Another early morning meeting today. Stiffling a yawn, you touch the display on your cell phone to kill the alarm, and so you start your morning routine. Luckily, you've got your cell, which can connect you to the internet, act as a global positioning sensor, and do countless other convienient things for you. Unfortunately, you have me as an adversary.

I know when you will be waking for the next three months, you've saved this data on your cell, and your computer-and those two devices are my very best of friends. Over morning coffee, you casually flip through the news channels on digital cable, settling on a story about commodities futures. I know down to the second how long you've spent on each channel. I know how you lingered a bit longer on the channel with the teen girl. . . . .this information is now available to marketers, and whoever I deem worthy.

Walking out to your car, you use the alarm remote to unlock your car. I've now captured the radio signal, it's a simple digital pattern, and now I have twenty four hour access to your ride. After sitting in the driver's seat, you reach into your tote bag and get your phone's car charger out. As you pull out into the street I see your cell phone negotiate with each cell tower in the area. I know the position of your phone, and you to wthin ten feet at all times as long as it is turned on. If only you left it on at all times, as so many of my mindless, ignorant, and unwitting "clients" do.

You finally make it to the bridge after the usual bout of road rage, and are relieved that you have your toll tag. I am too, because it gives me secondary confirmation of your whereabouts, with your toll tag, and your cell phone in the same location-this is definitley you.

Having parked the car, you card key into the office building, show your badge to the security guard, and walk to your desk. Today I will hear every telephone conversation that you are involved in, read every e-mail that you send or recieve, and monitor every websight that you visit. Because of the security cameras, and my ability to access them-I know how long you spend in the restroom.

Do you remember "Jurassic Park?" Imagine yourself an insect forever trapped in amber. That is how I see you. I can view you from any angle I desire. You are totally known to me. Just as the scientist extract information from a long dead insect, I extract a fountain of information from you. As you move through your day, you unknowingly offer up an ocean of information to me. I know more about you than you know about yourself.

Who employs you is not important. What is important is that I have compiled a complete profile on you. You won't be getting that raise. You will be deemed unfit after I order a subscription of "Guns and Amo" and have it delivered to your home, because of my knowledge of Van Eck radiation, and it's applications-I have your credit card numbers, and use them when I see fit.

Your spouse is upset with you too, as I've accessed phone records, and called your home posing convincingly as an old friend, I ask politely if you can still get that killer California meth that we used to do together. Your friends are pissed too-from your e-mail address I've sent them all the most devistating computer virus yet created. Starting today, your life will never be the same; tonight I will plant incriminating evidence of pedaphillia in your vehicle. Should you live or die-I don't care. You are a walking digital corpse.

Note: This short story was taken by and large from Ted Flynn's"Hope Of The Wicked," and concerns Echelon, NSA's satanic baby. I didn't write it, I modified it.

Disinformation Is Your Best Friend.

Using Disinformation For Personal Protection - InfoBarrel

Stand Up For The Bill Of Rights - Patriotism In Dissent

2012-02-29T08:08:00.000-06:00

Stand Up For Your Rights

Standing up for our rights, YOUR rights, the ones provided to us all in the Bill Of Rights is becoming an increasingly difficult thing to do in the United States of America. Presidential administrations have continually assaulted the Bill Of Rights in recent years; and never was this more apparent than in the George W. Bush "patriot act." The situation, and total disregard of the principles that the United States of America were founded on became even more clear when the criminal organization known as the Missouri Information Analysis Centreeven went so far as to claim that "domestic terrorists" were more likely to be persons who have Bill of Rights, and United States Constitution bumper stickers on their vehicles. Of course the grand irony here is that an organization that would promote such a bogus idea is itself a domestic terrorist organization; and policeofficers who pull over and harass passers-by on the free-ways for such bumper stickers are themselves domestic terrorist, as they freely and openly scorn the principles upon which this once great nation was founded.

Police officers in the United States of America have become increasingly militaristic in latter years, and much more resemble Nazi Gestapo than they do anything that would deserve the honour of being called a "peace officer," and American police seem to systemically encourage and encroach upon the Fourth Amendment of the Bill Of Rights, as if they'd never even heard of it, and I'm willing to bet that many of them haven't. Surely they covered the violation of the fourth Amendment, and how to do it, in police training, there's really no other way to go about explaining the systemic failures of modern police to honour theFourth Amendment to the Bill Of Rights that I can think of.

"Well, if you have nothing to hide then you don't have anything to worry about."

Such a lie, and most every officer of the law in modern police state America is determined to find some reason to violate your Fourth Amendment rights, and if you get the line of bullshit up above, you're lucky indeed to have the chance to say simply,

"Get A Warrant."

Indeed, nothing more ever need be said; and without a real probable cause, I advise gunfire in the event of forced entry to your home. "No Knock" raids be damned, they violate every right in the Bill Of Rights when used to bust in the door of a "suspected" criminal, the only justifications for those procedures are when the most dire of circumstances are at hand; and this is NOT how they are being used in America today.

Even The police will tell you, if you've got their confidence as a fellow human, which is rare, that it's never advisable to speak to police officers about any crime, it can never work towards YOUR benefit.

The whole aim of practical politics, of course, is to cause a commotion, and fear in the populace, and the fearful little sheep will clamour for safety! Imaginary hobgoblins abound! Save Us Big Daddy Government!!!

But those willing to give up freedoms for temporary illusions of safety deserve neither freedom, nor safety.

Obama, Bush, What's The Difference?

Obama Employs Bush Administration Tactic

Not only has the Obama administration continued on with the illegal policies and the absolute disregard of the Bill Of Rights in the same manner as had the previous administration, the Obama administration has proven itself not to even have the aims of an administration under the Democratic party ideals and goals. President Obama is a Conservative President of the United States.

On Wednesday, Obama said he “would try to block the court-ordered release of photos showing U.S. troops abusing prisoners.” The release, which was to be the result of a Freedom of Information Act request made by the ACLU, had been reasonable in the final weeks of April, but today, Obama chose to come out against the release.

According to the Associated Press, “out of concern [that] the pictures would "further inflame anti-American opinion" and endanger U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan” Obama planned to block them.

Obama intends to block the release of the photos because they may negatively impact American empire and American military adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. Gen. Ray Odierno, a prime architect of “the surge” in Iraq, and Gen. David Petraeus influenced Obama’s decision after informing the administration that they were afraid the photos will “cost American lives.”

Obama suggested that the “photos had already served their purpose in investigations of "a small number of individuals” and "the individuals who were involved have been identified, and appropriate actions have been taken."

Also, Obama made the argument that "these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib."

When choosing to make a “mockery” out of his “promise of transparency and accountability” (as one member of the ACLU put it), Obama is fine with contending that if information requested does not show something worse than said previous atrocity or does not show that something more inhumane happened the information should not be released.

Even if the information would give further credence to the argument that the Bush Administration tortured (which many in the corporate news media are still reluctant to outright accept as they continue to cling to the “enhanced interrogation technique” euphemism when discussing “torture”), the fact that it does not top the brutality of a batch of previous photos means that the ACLU’s FOIA request should not be fulfilled.

The ACLU released a response to Obama’s decision, which was written by Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU:

The Obama administration's adoption of the stonewalling tactics and opaque policies of the Bush administration flies in the face of the president's stated desire to restore the rule of law, to revive our moral standing in the world and to lead a transparent government. This decision is particularly disturbing given the Justice Department's failure to initiate a criminal investigation of torture crimes under the Bush administration.

"It is true that these photos would be disturbing; the day we are no longer disturbed by such repugnant acts would be a sad one. In America, every fact and document gets known – whether now or years from now. And when these photos do see the light of day, the outrage will focus not only on the commission of torture by the Bush administration but on the Obama administration's complicity in covering them up. Any outrage related to these photos should be due not to their release but to the very crimes depicted in them. Only by looking squarely in the mirror, acknowledging the crimes of the past and achieving accountability can we move forward and ensure that these atrocities are not repeated.

"If the Obama administration continues down this path, it will betray not only its promises to the American people, but its commitment to this nation's most fundamental principles. President Obama has said we should turn the page, but we cannot do that until we fully learn how this nation veered down the path of criminality and immorality, who allowed that to happen and whose lives were mutilated as a result. Releasing these photos – as painful as it might be – is a critical step toward that accounting. The American people deserve no less."

Obama said of the Freedom of Information Act in a January 21 memo, “The government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears.”

But, on matters of American empire or “state secrets,” the administration is as bad as Bush if not worse.

Robert Gibbs’ press briefing on the reversal shows just how poor a case the administration has for keeping these photos from being released:

QUESTION: Can you go over the sequence of events that led to this thought process? Because, on April 24th, when the Pentagon was explaining its decision to release the photos, it said that -- the spokesman said that there was a feeling that the case had pretty much run its course.

GIBBS: Uh-huh.

QUESTION: And now you’re saying that the president feels that there’s a strong argument to be made...

GIBBS: Because the argument that the president has asked his legal team to make is not an argument that the previous legal team made in that case. They argued a couple of different things, including, a law enforcement exception. And the judge ruled that, to seek a law enforcement exception, you have to -- you have to disclose the name of the person that would be -- that harm would be derived for in seeking that exception. This is a different argument that the president thinks is compelling.

QUESTION: Well, when did he decide that it was important to make that argument? Did one of the lawyers come to him and say...

GIBBS: No. He came to the lawyers.

QUESTION: And when did all that...

GIBBS: That was a meeting that was held last week in the Oval Office.

QUESTION: Robert, if that was such a compelling case, why was that not weighed in April then? Because it seems like -- was there a failure here at the White House in the first go-round in April to fully weigh the national security implications?

GIBBS: The argument that the president seeks to make is one that hasn’t been made before. The -- I’m not going to get into blame for this or that. Understanding that there was significant legal momentum in these cases prior to the president entering into office, we are now at a point where it is likely that some stay will be asked to prevent the release of these photos. And I believe the date -- I think we have until June 8th to appeal -- to seek review of those decisions by the Second Circuit.

QUESTION: But on April 24th, you also said, quote, “The Department of Justice decided, based on the ruling, the court ruling, is that it was, quote, hopeless to appeal.”

GIBBS: Right. QUESTION: Now you’re saying it’s not hopeless. GIBBS: Well, based on the argument that -- yes, I said that it was hopeless based on the argument that was made during the course of the original FOIA lawsuit, the appeal, the three-judge ruling, and the decision to decline the full circuit to make that -- to make those determinations. The president isn’t -- what I’m saying to you, Ed, is the president isn’t going back to remake the argument that has been made. The president is going -- has asked his legal team to go back and make a new argument based on national security.

QUESTION: This new argument -- if you’re saying, basically, that this could put troops in further harm’s way in Iraq and Afghanistan, Former Vice President Cheney, General Hayden, others have made the same argument about releasing the so-called torture memos. Do you have any regrets about putting those memos out? They’ve made the same argument about them?

GIBBS: No. Well, I’ll use the example I’ve used on this before, Ed. You didn’t begin to report on enhanced interrogation techniques at the release of the OLC memos, did you?

QUESTION: No.

GIBBS: OK. The -- I’m saying...

QUESTION: (Inaudible)

GIBBS: Hold on. I’m also sensing that the graphic that CNN uses to denote what happens when somebody gets waterboarded wasn’t likely developed based on reading memos that were released three weeks ago. The existence of enhanced interrogation techniques were noted by the former administration in speeches that they gave. You read about the enhanced interrogation techniques in autobiographies written by members of that former administration. The notion...

QUESTION: The graphics would not also be based on any prisoner photos you might release because we already know that people were abused in prisons. So why not put them out there?

GIBBS: I’m not sure that you’d do a graphic of a photo.

QUESTION: No. A graphic of someone being abused. We’ve all seen Abu Ghraib photos, and you were saying about the photos back in April, lack, it’s already exhausted and, essentially, these photos are going to come out anyway.

GIBBS: Based on the previous legal argument, yes. The previous legal argument denoted that the case had been lost. There’s a new legal argument that’s being made. My sense is, Ed, why do you do a graphic on CNN?

QUESTION: We’re trying to show people -- explain to people...

GIBBS: OK. The president believes that the existence of the photos themselves does not actually add to the understanding that detainee abuse happened, was investigated, that actions were taken by those that did, indeed, or might have undertaken potential abuse of detainees. And those cases were all dating back to finishing in 2004.

GIBBS: The president doesn’t believe the release of a photo surrounding that investigation does the anything to illuminate the existence of that investigation, only to provide some portion of sensationality.

QUESTION: Robert, is that really his role to decide whether or not it illuminates? That’s not the president of the United States’ role to decide, well, this is information will illuminate for the people, and this information isn’t.

GIBBS: No, the -- the -- the role of the president in this situation is as commander-in-chief. And if he determines that, through the release of these photos, that they pose a threat to those that serve to protect our freedom in Iraq and Afghanistan through the illumination of whatever, he can make a determination to ask his legal team to go back to court and make a legal argument that he doesn’t believe was made and provides the most salient case and most important points for not releasing these photos.

Those determinations are, indeed, made by this president and -- and -- and are being made.

QUESTION: The Bush administration has obviously made the argument that releasing these specific photographs will endanger troops, and they did so in the way that you described, with -- with seeking the FOIA exemption for law enforcement personnel.

GIBBS: Right.

(interruption)

QUESTION: The specific avenue that your -- that your legal team’s going to go, you’re not sure if it’s going to be going back to the district court or...

GIBBS: I don’t know the -- I’ll check with -- put that -- we’ll check with -- with those guys specifically. I think, in some ways, they’re looking at whether it is to go to a lower court or to go to the Supreme Court.

QUESTION: And then just to follow up on the new argument, so are there specific -- is there specific case law arguments that the president knows that exist that were not used? Because it’s -- I find it hard to believe that the Bush administration didn’t turn under every rock to try to find an argument to do this.

GIBBS: Well, the president doesn’t believe that was the case. And the president, after reviewing the case, believes that -- that we have a compelling argument. [emphasis added]

Homeland Insecurity and Illegal, Unconstitutional Laptop Seizures.

Homeland Security's laptop seizures: Interview with Rep. Sanchez

By Glenn Greenwald

APFor those who regularly write and read about civil liberties abuses, it's sometimes easy to lose perspective about just how extreme and outrageous certain erosions are. One becomes inured to them, and even severe incursions start to seem ordinary. Such was the case, at least for me, withHomeland Security's practice of detaining American citizens upon their re-entry into the country, and as part of that detention, literally seizing their electronic products -- laptops, cellphones, Blackberries and the like -- copying and storing the data, and keeping that property for months on end, sometimes never returning it. Worse, all of this is done not only without a warrant, probable cause or any oversight, but even without reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in any crime. It's completely standard-less, arbitrary, and unconstrained. There's no law authorizing this power nor any judicial or Congressional body overseeing or regulating what DHS is doing. And the citizens to whom this is done have no recourse -- not even to have their property returned to them.

When you really think about it, it's simply inconceivable that the U.S. Government gets away with doing this. Seizing someone's laptop, digging through it, recording it all, storing the data somewhere, and then distributing it to various agencies is about the most invasive, privacy-destroying measure imaginable. A laptop and its equivalents reveal whom you talk to, what you say, what you read, what you write, what you view, what you think, and virtually everything else about your life. It can -- and often does -- contain not only the most private and intimate information about you, but also information which the government is legally barred from accessing (attorney/client or clergy/penitent communications, private medical and psychiatric information and the like). But these border seizures result in all of that being limitlessly invaded. This is infinitely more invasive than the TSA patdowns that caused so much controversy just two months ago. What kind of society allows government agents -- without any cause -- to seize all of that whenever they want, without limits on whom they can do this to, what they access, how they can use it: even without anyone knowing what they're doing?

This Homeland Security conduct has finally received some long-overdue attention over the past several months as a result of people associated with WikiLeaks or Bradley Manning being subjected to it. In July, Jacob Appelbaum, a WikiLeaks volunteer, was detained for hours at Newark Airport, had his laptop and cellphones seized (the cellphones still have not been returned), and was told that the same thing would happen to him every time he tried to re-enter the country; last week, it indeed occurred again when he arrived in Seattle after a trip to Iceland, only this time he was afraid to travel with a laptop or cellphone and they were thus unable to seize them (they did seize his memory sticks, onto which he had saved a copy of the Bill of Rights). The same thing happened to 23-year-old American David House after he visited Bradley Manning in the Quantico brig and worked for Manning's legal defense fund: in November, House returned to the U.S. from a vacation in Mexico with his girlfriend and her family, was detained, and had his laptop and memory sticks seized (they were returned only after he retained the ACLU of Massachusetts to demand their return).

But this is happening to far more than people associated with WikiLeaks. As a result of writing about this, I've spoken with several writers, filmmakers, and activists who are critics of the government and who have been subjected to similar seizures -- some every time they re-enter the country. In September, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of these suspicionless searches; one of the plaintiffs on whose behalf they sued is Pascal Abidor, a 26-year-old dual French-American citizen who had his laptop seized at the border when returning to the U.S. last year:

Abidor was traveling from Montreal to New York on an Amtrak train in May when he had his laptop searched and confiscated by Custom and Border Patrol officers. Abidor, an Islamic Studies Ph.D. student, was questioned, handcuffed, taken off the train and kept in a holding cell for several hours before being released without charge. When his laptop was returned 11 days later, there was evidence that many of his personal files, including research, photos and chats with his girlfriend, had been searched.

A FOIA request from the ACLU revealed that in the 18-month period beginning October 1, 2008, more than 6,600 people -- roughly half of whom are American citizens -- were subjected to electronic device searches at the border by DHS, all without a search warrant. But the willingness of courts to act is unclear at best. The judiciary, with a few exceptions, has been shamelessly deferential in the post-9/11 era to even the most egregious assertions of Executive Branch power in the name of security. Combine that with the stunning ignorance of technology on the part of many judges -- many of whom have been on the bench a long time and are insulated by their office from everyday life -- and it's not hard to envision these practices being endorsed. Indeed, two appellate courts have thus far held -- reversing the rulings of lower courts -- that Homeland Security agents do not even need to show "reasonable suspicion" to search and seize a citizens' electronic products when re-entering their country. Some lower court judges, however, continue to rule the practice unconstitutional: see here for one federal judge's emphatic rejection of the Obama DOJ's arguments as to why such searches fall outside of the Bill of Rights.

In a July, 2008 Senate hearing, then-Sen. Russ Feingold hosted the Association of Corporate Travel Executives, which vehemently opposes this practice, and Feingold said this:

Over the last two years, reports have surfaced that customs agents have been asking U.S. citizens to turn over their cell phones or give them the passwords to their laptops. The travelers have been given a choice between complying with the request or being kept out of their own country. They have been forced to wait for hours while customs agents reviewed and sometimes copied the contents of the electronic devices. In some cases, the laptops or cell phones were confiscated and returned weeks or even months later, with no explanation.

Back then, this was painted as yet another Bush/Cheney assault on civil liberties, so one frequently heard denunciations like this from leading Democrats such as Sen. Pat Leahy: "It may surprise many Americans that their basic constitutional rights do not exist at our ports of entry even to protect private information contained on a computer. It concerns me, and I believe that actions taken under the cover of these decisions have the potential to turn the Constitution on its head." But now that this practice has continued -- and seemingly expanded -- under the Obama presidency, few in Congress seem to care.

Indeed, even in the wake of increasing complaints, Congress has done nothing to curb these abuses or even regulate them. But at least one member of the House, Rep. Loretta Sanchez, a California Democrat, is attempting to do something. Rep. Sanchez has introduced a very modest bill -- H.R. 216 -- requiring Homeland Security to issue rules governing these searches and seizures so that they are no longer able to operate completely in the dark and without standards. The bill would also impose some reporting requirements on DHS (Section 4); provide some very modest rights to those subjected to these seizures as well as some minor procedural limits on DHS agents (Sec. 2); and would compel "a civil liberties impact assessment of the rule, as prepared by the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Department of Homeland Security" (Sec. 2(b)(9)).

Yesterday, I spoke with Rep. Sanchez about her bill, and the 8-minute interview can be heard on the player below. I actually anticipated this interview would be somewhat confrontational because I think this bill -- though well-intentioned -- is woefully inadequate and potentially even counter-productive. The bill does not in any way curb the central abuse: Homeland Security's seizure of people's property without any probable cause or even reasonable suspicion (a bill introduced by then-Sen. Feingold would have barred all such searches in the absence of reasonable suspicion). Rep. Sanchez's bill also leaves it up to DHS to promulgate its own rules rather than having Congress fulfill its oversight duties by imposing rules on the agency. And worst of all, the bill could be seen as codifying -- granting the Congressional stamp of approval and thus strengthening -- Homeland Security's power to conduct these suspicionless seizures.

But the more I listened to her, the more I thought that perhaps this is a good first step -- at least arguably better than nothing (I'm still ambivalent on that question). At the very least, this bill would force into the sunlight information about what DHS is actually doing, perhaps generating some controversy and enabling more stringent restrictions. It would provide some formal mechanism for citizens to complain about abuse and try to have their laptops returned (though, as computer expert Jacob Appelbaum told me, he would never trust a laptop that had been in the custody of government agents, as it could easily be fixed, without detection, to surveil all future use). And it would impose at least some guidelines against invading attorney/client and other sensitive data (though without any enforcement mechanism, it'd be less like a requirement and more like a suggestion that would likely be ignored).

One point Rep. Sanchez emphasized is that even if she wanted a stronger bill (and it seems clear she does), the chance of enacting it in the GOP House is very small. After all, the Democratic Congress did nothing about this problem. But that underscores one amazing point: the right-wing of the Republican Party and its "Tea Party" faction endlessly tout their devotion to limited federal government powers, individual rights, property rights, and the Constitution. If they were even minimally genuine in those claims, few things would offend and anger them more than federal agents singling out and detaining whichever citizens they want, and then taking their property, digging through and recording their most personal and private data -- all without any oversight or probable cause. Yet with very few exceptions (a few groups on the Right, including religious conservatives, opposed some excesses of the Patriot Act, while the small libertarian faction of the GOP oppose many of these abuses), they seem indifferent to, even supportive of, the very policies that most violently injure their ostensible principles.

The United States Constitution

The United States Constitution - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net
A Hypertext version of the United States Constitution. A Government that disregards the Constitution is a criminal government, and it's laws are not laws, and should not be obeyed if they do not line up with the United States Constitution.

The Bill Of Rights.

US Constitution--Bill of Rights--The First Ten Amendments
The First Ten Amendments of The Bill Of Rights. Do Not Allow Police or Government To Violate YOUR Rights, when you do, it makes it easier for them to continue doing so, and thus, MY rights are violated too. Soon, they will be lost, forever.

Jury Nullification - The Rights Of Jurors To Overturn Corrupt Laws.

2012-02-27T17:54:00.001-06:00

Jury Nullification, Power To The People.

In the United States of America, we have rule by law, we have no kings, and no person has greater authority than law, and in the United States of America, the United States Constitution IS the foundation of law. The presidency of George W. Bush, among many other heinous war crimes, and violations of decency, and human rights, not only in America, but across the span of the globe, enacted unconstitutional laws. Those so called laws are inherently invalid when they fail to fall under the guide lines established by the Constitution of the United States of America, laws that do not line up with the United States Constitution are invalid, worthless, and treasonous to follow, or to even acknowledge as legitimate laws in this nation.

Jury Nullification is the rights of Juries to NULLIFY a law that is itself harmful, repugnant, discriminatory, and invalid, per the guide lines established in the United States Constitution. Not only is the Constitution of the United States of America still under attack by the current presidential administration, so is the Bill of Rights. Jury Nullification gives the power to any group of twelve jurors to overturn any "law" that it so wishes to overturn, and this power supersedes that of any President, judge, or court in the United States of America

Why is it, you ask, that the middle class continues to shrink, jobs continue to be exported, and the very inalienable rights guaranteed us all in the United States Constitution continue to be tramples upon by our criminal government? Our people suffer for lack of knowledge, they do not know their rights, they are apostate people, unaware of what they had been given as their birthright. The mass media has always had a globalist agenda, and has subverted and distorted the truth of every last matter at hand for the benefit of those who would seek to end the United States of America as a sovereign nation, but so long as the people are willing to allow this, it will continue, and criminal, unconstitutional violations of the very LAW that this nation was founded upon, such as the "patriot act," fusion centers, F.E.M.A.,and "Homeland Security" will flourish. We, the people do not need allow this, our rights as jurors give us power over that of any judge, or president.

Jury Nullification Balances the Scales of Justice, and Make Justice Blind, and Just.

2012-01-24T07:37:00.000-06:00

We are quickly approaching what the Mayans deem the end time. I reference Tool's lyric "Some say the end is near." The end was supposed to come at 1900. Then the end was supposed to come at 2000. We braced for Y2K. Strange things have been happening, but they are hardly end times things. I think the Mayans might have miscalculated.

We have obscene technology. I mean obscene in a good way. Since there are aliens and secret things going on, our government either knows of it, or is toying with it. There is a reason for a conspiracy theory. If nothing was happening, there would be no need for a theory. If you want to learn about postulates and theorems, go to school. 2012 shall come..and it shall pass. If you are choosing just now to make ready, nothing you can do makes ready for something so cataclysmic.

I apologize (first to my educators who taught me to not use 'I' in an essay and second to the world that thinks that we have the technology to make beautiful things like what happened in the movie 2012 any kind of a reality).

Be kind to one another. Believe in whatever you believe in. Buy a bunch of canned goods and make bunkers. Sit back and realize that Que cera cera. Sorry for the lack of translation to your benefit. You have search engine tools for that...for now.

tHDF

Former CIA Spy Tells the Truth

2012-01-06T03:34:00.000-06:00

I have few goals in life, and certainly my life's work won't include the human accomplishments equating corporate American "success" that this man's life has achieved. Don't get me wrong, I love money, but I don't look for it to much come my way, you see - one must first have all the "success" that one wants before they start making efforts at telling the truth about anything.

The only marketable skill in my life that I've developed is repairing someone's air conditioner; and that's just plain blue collar skilled labour, it's not the kind of thing that leads one onward to near over doses of American dreams. Even in that respectable mostly Southern business endeavour, one must hold their cards close to their chest, and hide many things from the customer in order to do business.

Often times, people are simply sold more than they needed.

We live in a world today where little is sold that is ever actually needed, and especially is this true in the realm of information. While it can't be said that America's mainstream media lies all day every day, it CAN be said that the truth is never told there, and only bits of it are thrown upon any given table, the bits needed to imply what the corporate heads wanted in conjunction with others of the hydra, to sell the ideas that were desired to an unwitting and drugged public.

The United States Government will steal your dope and help you look for it, literally; and then arrest you for buying it. It's no secret that we've got government by corporation, corporations that build private prisons, and corporate donations that get the people who make the laws elected.

It doesn't take much of a logician to surmise that a government that would do that to it's own people is doing far worse to other peoples out of sight. All the while, hey, isn't my favourite tv program on now? Sorry, I'll catch you later. My distractions are calling.