<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620</id><updated>2024-08-29T20:46:57.063-04:00</updated><category term="Television"/><category term="review"/><category term="Classic"/><category term="Angel"/><category term="Dollhouse"/><category term="The Wire"/><category term="The Wire Season One"/><category term="non-review"/><category term="Angel Season One"/><category term="Buffy"/><category term="Dexter"/><category term="Firefly"/><category term="Glee"/><category term="Glee Season Two"/><category term="LOST"/><category term="blog stuff"/><title type='text'>It&#39;s Just Television</title><subtitle type='html'>Talking current and classic television</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default?redirect=false'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>8</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-6461930974521257037</id><published>2012-10-02T12:11:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2012-10-02T12:13:27.535-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Dexter"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><title type='text'>&quot;Dexter&quot; and the Art of Reinvention</title><summary type="text">


I remember when I first watched Dexter. It was in the summer of 2008, and I was pregnant with my now 4 year old daughter, Rhiannon. My husband and I decided to check it out on the strength of multiple recommendations from friends. I was fascinated by the premise, about a serial killer who, of course, to make it more palatable for television, only kills bad guys. He had a code, forced upon him </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/6461930974521257037/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/10/dexter-and-art-of-reinvention.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/6461930974521257037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/6461930974521257037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/10/dexter-and-art-of-reinvention.html' title='&quot;Dexter&quot; and the Art of Reinvention'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-1447388765764029501</id><published>2012-09-22T11:00:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-09-22T15:29:04.887-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Angel"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Buffy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Dollhouse"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Firefly"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="LOST"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="non-review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><title type='text'>A little bit of history</title><summary type="text">So, I&#39;m sitting here reading my blog posts over again, and it occurs to me: why would anyone read what I have to say? What do I have to bring to the table?



I love television. I love dramatic, funny, well thought out, well acted television. Everybody else who writes about TV will tell you the exact same thing. They love watching it, they love reading about it, they love writing about it. But I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/1447388765764029501/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/09/a-little-bit-of-history.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/1447388765764029501'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/1447388765764029501'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/09/a-little-bit-of-history.html' title='A little bit of history'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-5577684711394063553</id><published>2012-09-21T15:17:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2012-09-22T15:29:37.637-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Dollhouse"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><title type='text'>Dollhouse, &quot;Ghost&quot; </title><summary type="text">

I love Dollhouse. I love what it has to say about identity, about technology, and about the male gaze and how that can be perverted and twisted and made into something awful (see Nolan and his treatment of Priya) or something beautiful (Patton Oswalt&#39;s Joel Minor, and his annual engagement, his need to see his dead wife and have her be a party to his success). But there&#39;s no denying that it got</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/5577684711394063553/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/09/dollhouse-ghost.html#comment-form' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/5577684711394063553'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/5577684711394063553'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/09/dollhouse-ghost.html' title='Dollhouse, &quot;Ghost&quot; '/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpYAnBIFS0nG-SEVs0btVrPYSvpiqVDiV4Boa1PKHNGZ_6MrHwLGgt4YJygxayMCgy-tJr4WyxZcEofxSTShs49CAo0C67Rf5MKoMe2K5Su6kIJmihfPbIQbLUMyYH4FPUXDdYIa77tqw/s72-c/elizadollhousepilot.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-4548347789411818429</id><published>2012-09-20T13:37:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2012-09-20T13:38:45.875-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog stuff"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="non-review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><title type='text'>Dusting off the blog</title><summary type="text">Well.

I didn&#39;t forget about the blog, I promise. The truth is, I had another kid, I got overwhelmed with life stuff, and &amp;nbsp;I just couldn&#39;t find the time that I wanted to devote to this blog, which is a true passion project of mine. But if you&#39;re passionate about something, you MAKE time for it, right? So no more excuses. I still make the time to watch TV, obsessively so, so I can make the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/4548347789411818429/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/09/dusting-off-blog.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/4548347789411818429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/4548347789411818429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2012/09/dusting-off-blog.html' title='Dusting off the blog'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-5138561786490925394</id><published>2011-02-11T19:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-09-22T15:29:56.373-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Classic"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="The Wire"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="The Wire Season One"/><title type='text'>Classic Review: The Wire 1x05 - 1x09</title><summary type="text">Watching The Wire is a bit like watching the writers assemble a giant jigsaw puzzle. They have all the pieces &amp;nbsp;and we&#39;re looking on as they fill in all of the blanks, starting with square one. I hesitate to say that every season is like this, as some of them come &quot;pre-assembled&quot;, if you will. You have the center of the puzzle, which is usually the detail or some faction thereof, and as the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/5138561786490925394/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/classic-review-wire-1x05-1x09.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/5138561786490925394'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/5138561786490925394'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/classic-review-wire-1x05-1x09.html' title='Classic Review: The Wire 1x05 - 1x09'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-7537304427689609845</id><published>2011-02-08T20:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-09-22T15:29:56.376-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Glee"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Glee Season Two"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><title type='text'>Glee Season Two - &quot;The Substitute&quot; to &quot;The Sue Sylvester Shuffle&quot;</title><summary type="text">About 4 months ago, I gave up on watching&amp;nbsp;Glee. My reasons for this are many and varied, but the chief reason was this: Why was I wasting my time trying to connect with and care about these characters, when it was clear that the three men writing it (Ryan Murphy, Ian Brennan, and Brad Falchuk) didn&#39;t seem to care about them?
 Characters change motivation from episode to episode, sometimes </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/7537304427689609845/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/glee-season-two-substitute-to-sue.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/7537304427689609845'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/7537304427689609845'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/glee-season-two-substitute-to-sue.html' title='Glee Season Two - &quot;The Substitute&quot; to &quot;The Sue Sylvester Shuffle&quot;'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-8978112283624605262</id><published>2011-02-08T20:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-09-22T15:29:56.380-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Classic"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="The Wire"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="The Wire Season One"/><title type='text'>Classic Review: The Wire 1x01 - 1x04</title><summary type="text">


(Video is NSFW! Contains profanity and adult subjects.)
&quot;So if Snot always stole the money, why did you let him play?&quot; &quot;Got to. This America, man.&quot; Every season of&amp;nbsp;The Wire&amp;nbsp;opens with a scene like this. A scene that tells you (in mostly oblique overtones) what you&#39;re about to see. The opening scene of&amp;nbsp;The Wire&amp;nbsp;sets the tone and also provides David Simon&#39;s mission statement </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/8978112283624605262/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/classic-review-wire-1x01-1x04.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/8978112283624605262'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/8978112283624605262'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/classic-review-wire-1x01-1x04.html' title='Classic Review: The Wire 1x01 - 1x04'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6350619267024615620.post-4561407201948051</id><published>2011-02-08T20:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-09-22T15:29:56.370-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Angel"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Angel Season One"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Classic"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="review"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Television"/><title type='text'>Classic Review: Angel 1x01, &quot;City Of&quot;</title><summary type="text">Full disclosure up front: I am not a fan of season 1 of this show. Like almost all of Joss Whedon&#39;s shows,Firefly&amp;nbsp;being the strong, strong exception, the show takes time to find its footing. I really believe that he and fellow creator&amp;nbsp;David Greenwalt just really, really wanted David Boreanaz and the character of Angel to have a spinoff. 
They didn&#39;t quite know where to go from there.&amp;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/feeds/4561407201948051/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/classic-review-angel-1x01-city-of.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/4561407201948051'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6350619267024615620/posts/default/4561407201948051'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://itsjusttelevision.blogspot.com/2011/02/classic-review-angel-1x01-city-of.html' title='Classic Review: Angel 1x01, &quot;City Of&quot;'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08844515837616672750</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>