Jackson's Identity Management & Active Directory Reality Tour Travelblog

Ash's Healthcare Observations

2009-12-14T12:01:00.000-08:00

Fellow blogger Ash Motiwala blogged about the Microsoft/Sentillion acquisition over the weekend. He has some great insights into the healthcare angle as to why this was important to Microsoft:

1. The healthcare IT market is pretty unique, and healthcare specific software tends to take precedence over the larger generic software providers. This has caused 100's (if not 1000's) of applications within a typical healthcare IT environment. Healthcare IT shops want to buy software from companies who understand them (with doctors in the exec board), and they'll pay top dollar for the special attention. For example, McKesson brought in over $100b in 2008 vs. Microsoft's $60b in all verticals.

2. Until about the mid 2000's, Microsoft's healthcare strategy was pretty bad. They might disagree with me, but anecdotal evidence suggests that they were trying to sell generic technology (like BizTalk, SharePoint, etc.) with a healthcare twist. In my opinion, that approach caused them to lag in healthcare, and was a major cause of complaint for Microsoft's healthcare account reps that I had dealt with in the past.

3. In 2005, Microsoft hired Peter Neupert as VP of their Health Solutions Group. Prior to that, Peter was the CEO of drugstore.com, and co-chair'd the healthcare IT committee for the President's IT Advisory Committee. In 2006, Microsoft acquired Azyxxi, a healthcare app that pulls and displays patient info from disparate sources, and competes with the Cerners and McKessons of the world. Good move. (They also brought over a doc with the acquisition to lead the software team!) They followed that up with the acquisition of Hospital 2000 by GCS, then Rosetta Biosoftware and the launching of HealthVault. At HIMMS 2008 in Orlando, Microsoft renamed their healthcare line 'Amalga'.

4. In line with their seemingly new strategy of going more vertical, this past June - Microsoft signed a licensing agreement with Sentillion to supply Sentillion's SSO and Context Management technology as part of Amalga. A few days ago, Microsoft announced its plan to acquire Sentillion.

The one thing I will add is I do know that the healthcare vertical in Microsoft is an important one. They have their own dedicated teams and there is clearly a lot of room for revenue growth for Microsoft - which is exactly why they purchased Sentillion. Ash's commentary certainly helps me understand Microsoft's actions better.

Technorati Tags:
Active Directory, Sentillion, ESSO, Microsoft, identity management, FIM

Further reflection on the Sentillion acquisition brings more questions

2009-12-10T08:45:00.000-08:00

Earlier today I blogged about Microsoft's acquisition of Sentillion. After letting this percolate in my mind for a while I thought I'd share some of the questions that have come up for me about this acquisition:

If you carefully read the press release you will see that there's a quote from Sentillion's CEO and a quote from Peter Neupert, corporate vice president, Microsoft Health Solutions Group. Why no quote from anyone on the Forefront Identity Management (FIM) team? My conclusion - possibly wrong: This acquisition was driven by the Health Solutions Group - not the FIM team.
Single sign-on (enterprise, web or federated) is a key identity management concept. Question: Will any of Sentillion's products or technology be integrated into the FIM stack? Microsoft owns Sentillion now. It would make sense to do this. However, if Sentillion will be exclusively run by the Health Solutions Group this could lead to a split identity management strategy at Microsoft and that would not be good. Imagine having to speak to the FIM sales guys about FIM and the healthcare sales guys about Sentillion/ESSO.
The Sentillion product line includes a product called "ProVision" which is focused on user provisioning. Question: What happens to that? Can Microsoft afford two user provisioning solutions? Even if one is for healthcare only? Will FIM replace ProVision? Will Microsoft keep any of Sentillion's IDM stack at all other than the healthcare-specific "context switching" stuff?
Why did Microsoft acquire Sentillion versus leveraging FIM? I can guess at a whole bunch of reasons why this didn't happen: Time to market of a FIM-based solution for the healthcare people; FIM being a more general purpose solution versus Sentillion's healthcare focus; or the healthcare people simply focusing on their market and Sentillion being a market leader was the obvious play.

I'm guessing that this was not an identity management acquisition but a healthcare acquisition meant to strength Microsoft's position in the healthcare market. That would lead me to believe that none of the Sentillion solution ends up in FIM. In either case, time will tell.

Technorati Tags:
identity management, Active Directory, Microsoft, MSFT, FIM, Forefront

Microsoft expands into enterprise single sign-on

2009-12-10T06:33:00.000-08:00

Microsoft announced this morning that they are acquiring Sentillion:

Sentillion has successfully combined patented technology with a deep understanding of the healthcare industry to deliver the most comprehensive set of solutions for single sign-on, clinical workstations, advanced authentication, identity management and desktop virtualization.

While the emphasis on the acquisition is healthcare focused I'm sure that Microsoft will want to roll some or all of the Sentillion technology into their FIM/identity management product line eventually.

Technorati Tags:
identity management, Active Directory, Microsoft, MSFT, FIM, Forefront

Password Security for Boneheads

2009-12-09T12:35:00.000-08:00

That's the title of an interesting article I just read over at InfoWorld. The author points out that many web sites are just not secure with respect to how they store or require passwords:

More disturbing is the way password recovery works on some of these sites. At least half the time, when I get the (unencrypted) recovery e-mail, my password is right there in the message, in plain text. That means the site is storing all those passwords in plain text in a database -- one that's being backed up somewhere and is probably readable by a significant number of admins and possibly anyone who happens to snag a backup tape. It's a catastrophe waiting to happen.

I agree - and I am sure most of you do also - that this is catastrophes waiting to happen and many have already happened! The problem is so much is now tied to our identities that it is nearly impossible to protect ourselves effectively. I once asked a lady in front of me at the grocery store why she wrote a check rather than use a debit/credit card to pay for her purchases and she responded with "I've never had my identity stolen via a check". Good point lady.

Technorati Tags:
security, identity management

Saving (AD) Forests

2009-12-04T03:47:00.000-08:00

A successful Active Directory forest recovery relies primarily on planning and documentation, so if you don’t have those in place now—jump on it.

Don Jones, a Microsoft MVP has written a white paper for Quest that provides real-world customer examples of forest failures and why you should be prepared for this sort of a disaster. It's definitely worth reading just to understand the magnitude of a forest recovery.

Technorati Tags:
Active Directory

Windows Access Rights Explained

2009-12-02T19:57:00.001-08:00

Fellow blogger Matt Flynn has published a white paper titled “Expert Insight on Windows Access Rights” which I managed to read yesterday. Matt gives a great overview of Windows Access Rights, how they are granted and, most importantly, how they are evaluated by the operating system. If you feel your knowledge of Windows Access Rights is a bit weak or you need a refresher on this topic I’d suggest reading Matt’s paper. It’s only 8 pages long but Matt packs a lot of great information in those pages…

If you think you know who has access to files by looking at the security tab, you’re dead wrong. Access to Windows file system resources is controlled via a complex web of interwoven components. And in most cases, users manage permissions on their own files and folders making centralized access management extremely difficult to achieve and audit of access rights near impossible without help. In this paper, we break down the elements that combine to control access to files on shared Windows network resources.

As Matt says, the Windows file system is complicated!

Technorati Tags: Microsoft,Active Directory,security

NGAD update from Mary-Jo

2009-11-30T09:54:00.000-08:00

If you don't follow Mary-Jo Foley's "All about Microsoft" blog you should. Mary-Jo has been writing about Microsoft for many years now. Her latest post is "Microsoft updates its enterprise ABC (Active Directory, BizTalk and Communications Server) roadmaps" and here's what she has to say about Active Directory:

Microsoft is readying a number of Active Directory add-ons that company officials are counting on to provide a backbone for the three-screens-and-a-cloud vision that Microsoft execs love to tout. The company is working on what it calls Next Generation Active Directory (NGAD), which is a federation service more than it is a whole new version of Active Directory. The goal is to enable users to “federate across all our directories — the phone, the PC and the cloud,” said Identity Architect Kim Cameron. Microsoft took a first step toward enabling NGAD (which so far, has no public due date) by releasing to interested parties in mid-November a downloadable schema application programming interface (API), system.identity. In the nearer term, Microsoft is planning to deliver the near-final Release Candidate (RC) test build of Active Directory Federation Services 2.0 before the end of this year and deliver the final version within the first quarter of 2010, Cameron said. ADFS 2.0 is one component of Microsoft’s “Geneva” identity platform. Microsoft released to manufacturing its Geneva framework piece (now known as Windows Identity Foundation) a week-plus ago.

There are still lots of questions about NGAD out there. Hopefully, over the next few months we'll get some answers...

Technorati Tags:
Microsoft, MSFT, Active Directory, NGAD, next generation active directory

Not much has changed on the directory front - until now!

2009-11-19T08:38:00.000-08:00

Dave Kearns over at Network World just published a story stating that "Not much has changed on the directory front". When I first read the headline I knew I wanted to agree - and blog my views on his comments. However, just as I was getting ready to write this a significant change event on the directory front happened. John Fontana - also of Network World - reported from the Microsoft PDC that "Microsoft touts groundbreaking 'clip-on' for Active Directory". So let's discuss Dave's story first:

"Not much has changed on the directory front"
As I said, I couldn't agree more. In 1996, if my memory is correct, Netscape released their LDAP-based directory server. It effectively killed the X.500 directory and also resulted in the ultimate demise of X.400 for messaging. Over the next few years we saw the launch of the meta-directory by Zoomit and then, in 2000, the launch of Active Directory by Microsoft. Aside from virtual directories gaining more momentum I would say that since Active Directory there have been no major advances on the directory front. Netscape started things off but Microsoft crossed the finish line and now has the most deployed LDAP-based directory in the world.

I agree with Dave that nothing much has really changed - until now...

"Microsoft touts groundbreaking 'clip-on' for Active Directory"
Kim Cameron at Microsoft discussed Next Generation Active Directory (NGAD) at the Professional Developers Conference this week. NGAD has been described as "a modular add-on that is built on a database and designed to add querying capabilities and performance never before possible in a directory". Hopefully, the term "clip-on" is not equivalent to "clippie"!

NGAD, however, is not a replacement for Active Directory but a "clip-on" that provides developers a single programming API for building access controls into applications that can run either internally, on devices or on Microsoft's Azure cloud operating system. Users will not have to alter their existing directories but will have to option to replicate data to NGAD instances. NGAD stores directory data in an SQL-based database and utilizes its table structure and query capabilities to express claims about users such as "I am over 21" or "Henry is my manager." To ensure security, each claim is signed by an issuing source, such as a company, and the signatures stay with the claim no matter where it is stored.

"You can answer questions in your directory that are currently impossible to even ask," says Kim Cameron, identity architect at Microsoft. "You can find out who had access to a file last September." He says NGAD is a reshaping of the programming model for Active Directory.

In addition, the directory design means multitudes of new cloud or other applications won't be hammering the central Active Directory architecture with lookup requests and administrators don't have to perform often tricky updates to directory schema to support those new applications.

Of course, extrapolating features, functionality and benefits at this point is difficult but you can see how NGAD could change our views of auditing, compliance, security and (NGAD)directory-enabled programming including cloud-based identity and identity as a service. I'm also betting that NGAD will be a significant enabler of the externalization of a distributed authorization infrastructure just as Active Diretory has been an enabler of a distributed authentication infrastructure.

I believe NGAD has the potential to be a big change or even an inflection point for the industry and customers. I'm sure we'll be seeing much more discussion about NGAD.

Technorati Tags:
Microsoft, MSFT, Active Directory, NGAD, next generation active directory

Gartner: Directories and Virtual Directories: Foundations of Your IAM Infrastructure

2009-11-09T15:31:00.001-08:00

Andrew Walls definition of today’s directory proliferation problem is quite appropriate: “I am Legion and we are many!”

Andrew talked about how virtual directories are “in fashion” these days. Interesting that when Andrew presented which vendors have a virtual directory that he put up Microsoft and IBM with question marks after them. His caution: Don’t assume that either of these vendors have these capabilities despite having info on their web site that they do. Andrew’s belief is that IBM and Microsoft don’t want their customers to look to another vendor to solve the virtual directory problem. I’m not sure about anyone else but I never believed either of these vendors had a virtual directory.

Andrew characterized meta-directory as storing data rather than fetching data like a virtual directory – and called them fundamentally the same. I disagree with this simple of a characterization but I certainly agree with Andrew’s statement that rapid deployment of a virtual directory is possible whereas in most cases you are not going to rapidly deploy a meta-directory.

Are meta-directory and virtual directory products melding – blurring the lines between themselves? Yes, and it’s high time that they did. Generally speaking, I think a customer can benefit from both of these technologies so why not use one product for that? Simple is always better. A virtual directory is the perfect veneer to stick on top of your directory infrastructure(s) because it allows you to swap underlying directory pieces in and out as your business changes.

And, I agree with Andrew’s comment that adding a virtual or meta-directory can hide the complexity of your infrastructure – it doesn’t fix it.

Technorati Tags: Gartner,identity management,Active Directory,virtual directories,meta-directories,#GartnerIAM

Gartner and The Death of IAM

2009-11-09T10:15:00.001-08:00

Earl Perkins kicked off the Gartner IAM summit with this talk: The Death of IAM and the Loss of Identity Innocence – A Review of Program Maturity, Service-Driven Change and New-Era Threats. Catchy title, eh?! It was certainly penned this way to draw attention to what Earl called an “inflection point” that is now happening in the IAM market.

Earl’s commentary centered around IAM – especially the “A” access part – accountability as the new phase of IAM. Gartner has clients who approach them daily who are now talking about replacing their first generation IAM systems – as Earl calls it, a “disaster summit” or a “do-over” conversation. In the area of governance (GRC) we are in the same place where we were with provisioning 5 years ago which means we are early and still have a long way to go in this area.

Earl see these trends in the “IAM Age of Accountability”:

- Externalization + decentralization = “The out is now in”

- Finding or identifying who is in charge

- “Scale” is becoming off the scale

- Delivery methods increase

- Expanding business process management

I think we have all seen much of the above. Much of this is being driven by the effects of compliance pressures on companies along with the drive to save money through the use of the “cloud”. It’s only going to get worse as federation begins to take off.

Earl also talked about the death of the IAM suite and birth of the IAM partnership. Not the actual, real death of the IAM suite but the importance of partnering with your IAM vendor and picking the right vendor that you can work with over time. While Earl didn’t say this nor do I think he meant that the magic quadrant is “dead” but I do wonder about customers who make IAM choices simply by looking at the MQ. Partnership cannot be measured by the Gartner MQ in my opinion.

Earl concluded by discussion how you map an IAM program into an information security program – taking you to serious business enablement, security effectiveness and security efficiency – where I expect we all want to end up.

I like how Earl characterized this as an “inflection point”. It’s a better term than saying IAM 2.0 or “next generation”. The fact of the matter is that market pressures (“requirements”) are causing the slope to change of companies needs in this area and by definition that is an inflection point. I do think that many of the early IAM products and suites are struggling with this inflection point whereas some of the newer vendors in these areas are able to cope with or build directly to this inflection point.

Interesting times for sure. For all of us – vendors and users.

Technorati Tags: Gartner,identity management

Windows Identity Foundation release candidate now available

2009-11-08T08:01:00.000-08:00

The Windows Identity Foundation (WIF) is now available as a release candidate per the Forefront Team Blog posting here.

Look for more information about "WIF" coming out of Microsoft's Professional Developer Conference, the week of Nov 16.

We are sending a number of our smart people to the PDC to check out WIF. This release will definitely mark the beginning of true market adoption of web-services based identity. (What we have seen so far has mostly been science experiments and very specific industry segment adoption)

Technorati Tags:
identity management, Windows Identity Foundation, WIF

See you at Gartner's Identity Conference?

2009-11-06T10:47:00.000-08:00

Gartner's Identity and Access Management conference starts this coming Monday in San Diego. Will you be there? I'll be there and Quest Software will also have a number of our IAM experts present along with a booth in the exposition area.

We'd love to see you so please drop by our speaking slots or come by our booth. I fully expect this to be an eventful conference - as usual!

Technorati Tags:
Gartner, identity managment, Quest Software, QSFT

Security = smoke detectors?

2009-11-03T09:06:00.000-08:00

We're always reading about fires and deaths that could have been prevented by smoke detectors. We are also always reading about security breaches that could have been prevented by having the proper software or policies in place.

I was reminded about this in "Better Security For Not Quite All" which appeared in ComputerWorld on November 2, 2009. The article isn't about a huge security breach but does discuss the difficulties and findings of just trying to enforce "screen locking" at the company in question:

We found that more than 70% of our approximately 6,000 users had disabled both the password requirement and the screen saver.

Clearly, these 6,000 users feel that their own convenience is more important than the company's security posture. This is, however, not too surprising is it? What was a bit more interesting were the results of the author's survey related to what other companies were doing:

When I proposed the change in our lockout policy to the CIO, he asked me to determine what other companies in our industry are doing. I have a pretty decent network of peers in this industry, so I asked them whether they enforce a screen lock -- and if so, what the timeout value is, and if not, what their policy regarding screen locks is. I was surprised by the results: Only one of the 20 companies in my survey enforces the screen lock. That wasn't the response I had anticipated, and it certainly wasn't what I wanted to report to the CIO. In the end, though, he agreed with me that this is one area where it's worth bucking the industry norm.

One in twenty? That's only 5%! I congratulate the author and his company for their choice to turn on the screen lock. I can only imagine that so many other firms haven't bothered to turn on such a basic security feature. It's cheaper than a smoke detector: If you're running Active Directory all you have to do is use Group Policy to turn this capability on.

Do you have a smoke detector installed? Is the battery still good? Have you tested it recently?

Technorati Tags:
security, identity management, QSFT, Quest Software

Goodbye, Don

2009-11-01T21:12:00.004-08:00

I first met Don Bowen when I was at Zoomit and we did an on-site presentation to him and his team. We flew from Ottawa and Toronto through a blizzard that shut down Chicago as we got the last plane out to Peoria, Illinois. It turned out we were the only vendor to make it through to Peoria and we won Caterpillar's business.

Don was a product manager's dream customer. Always had good ideas and new ways to use a product. He also stretched a product in ways it was never designed, pushed his vendors to do the right thing and was always ready to talk to you about life or technology - day or night. Whatever identity management conference I went to I would usually run into Don with his wife Eileen - especially at The Burton Group conferences.

Don had only one speed - full speed ahead - and that's how he attacked his brain cancer right to the end.

I'll miss you Don.

P.S. If you can, please help out Don's family via The Bowen Family Trust.

Technorati Tags:
Don Bowen, Bowen Family Trust

2009-11-01T21:12:00.003-08:00

2009-11-01T21:12:00.001-08:00

Reality tour visit to Vancouver

2009-10-30T08:01:00.000-07:00

I'm speaking at the Vancouver Technology User Group next week on "Shouldn't Single Sign-on Be Child's Play?". Quest Software is sponsoring the food. Welcome time is 6pm and we'll kick things off at 6:30pm. If you're interested in attending please click here for the registration link.

I hope to see you there!

Technorati Tags:
Quest Software, QSFT, identity management, single sign-on

Serious provisioning mistake costs $471,000!

2009-10-27T07:58:00.000-07:00

I read this in the morning paper today and thought you'd appreciate how serious of a provisioning mistake this was. Would you class this as an identity management issue? I certainly would. I'd also class it as a compliance issue. Great examples of how identity management and compliance are so interlinked. I wonder if Avaya already has an IDM product? If so, it shows you the hole that still exists in the checks and balances side of IDM and compliance.

A New Jersey company paid a man nearly half a million dollars before realizing he wasn't working.

Anthony Armatys was hired by telecommunications giant Avaya in 2002 for more than $100,000 a year. He changed his mind and didn't take the job, but the payroll department apparently never got the memo, according to the Star-Ledger.

For nearly five years, Avaya paid Armatys and he gladly accepted, spending most of the money on everyday items. The rest went straight into a retirement account. Armatys got caught when he tried to make an early withdrawal from that account.

He pleaded guilty to second-degree theft and has to pay the $470,995 back to Avaya. Armatys, 35, faces up to six years in prison when he's sentenced in January -- time enough to think about his next dream job.

Technorati Tags:
identity management, provisioning, compiance, security

Quest and Microsoft Executive Summit on Identity Management

2009-10-22T10:20:00.000-07:00

I'm pleased to tell you about the Quest and Microsoft executive summit being held Thursday, November 19, 2009 at the Microsoft Executive Briefing Center across the street from me here in Redmond, Washington.

Our experts will offer guidance for gaining greater efficiency and security from your current infrastructure, using best practices and real-life examples. We'll be discussing:

Common challenges and organizational impact of simplifying your access, single sign-on and identity management
Available solutions and services that can make your transition a success as well as facilitate a secure environment
How to comply with regulations and mitigate risks by automating and managing access to sensitive systems and data
Benefits of the Microsoft platforms for identity and access management

We have a number of awesome Microsoft speakers including Shanen Boettcher and Conrad Bayer who will be presenting, too. If you are interested in attending this event or would like more information please visit http://www.quest.com/IDAExecutiveSummit/

Technorati Tags:
identity management, Microsoft, MSFT, QSFT, Quest Software

Single Sign-on: Separating Fact from Fiction

2009-10-21T05:09:00.000-07:00

Quest Software is hosting a virtual trade show and the session I am doing is called "Single Sign-on: Separating Fact from Fiction". It has been recorded so if you're interested in seeing it all you have to do is click here.

Technorati Tags:
Quest Software, QSFT, single sign-on, identity management, Kerberos

ADAC & Windows Server 2008 R2

2009-10-13T15:16:00.000-07:00

My colleague and fellow blogger, Bob Bobel, has posted about a shortcoming in the latest and greatest from Microsoft related to Microsoft Exchange integration - actually, the lack thereof. Here's a link to his post and a quote:

One glaring regression is the lack of integration with Microsoft Exchange. The former Active Directory Users and Computers UI had extensions that would expose the critical attributes necessary to perform recipient management. This was handy for many people and its absence is already being mentioned. I would guess that eventually the Microsoft Exchange team will provide this, but so far it has been a no-show.

Good to know this up-front so you're not too surprised by this fact.

Is there money in federation?

2009-10-05T12:17:00.000-07:00

In my last post, "Microsoft on the verge", I talked about a number of things including "Geneva" or Windows Identity Foundation. One of the things that interests me about Microsoft's federation strategy is the inclusion of the foundation within Windows Server itself.

Why is this significant? Mainly because it means that federated scenarios are included in the server license so if a customer wants to federate with another organization all they have to do is set up the agreements and go from there without being concerned about additional licensing costs. As you can see from the Liberty Alliance test matrix Microsoft went through a battery of test to get their SAML 2.0 certification.

What does this all mean for Microsoft's customers? Well, it means that there may no longer be a need to purchase an actual federation solution from a 3rd party ISV. Or, as time goes on, I suspect that the inclusion of federation in the Windows platform will put significant pricing pressure on ISVs that sell federation products. ISVs will not be able to make a lot of money on pure federation solutions. However, I do believe that there are still three areas where ISVs will be able to add significant value over what Microsoft is delivering:

1. Auditing: I do not believe that Microsoft will be delivering a comprehensive audit capability around their federation components. As you can well imagine the need to audit federation or single sign-on "events" will be pretty important from a security and compliance perspective.

2. Management: By management I mean operational management of your federated relationships. How easy will setting up a federated partnership be? How easy will it be to monitor your on-going partnerships? How about troubleshooting those linkages?

3. Strong authentication: I haven't seen much discussed about enabling strong authentication of federated transactions. What if I want to use a smartcard or a one-time password (OTP) to protect my transactions?

Don't forget the basics that we have all come to rely on - or are asked to deliver by our company's management: Audit, compliance and security. They are all required - still.

Technorati Tags:
identity management, ADFS, SAML, strong authentication, security, Microsoft, MSFT, cloud computing

Microsoft on the verge?

2009-10-03T09:36:00.000-07:00

My Google news net caught this article for me today - Microsoft wary as security, identity integration plan lags - by John Fontana that's definitely worth a read.

Microsoft is on the verge of finally providing some pieces of software to back up its ambitious plan to integrate its security and identity technologies, but the company admits it is moving slower than it had anticipated.

Progress towards this goal, as many of us have already blogged, has been slow. One glimmer of movement in the right direction was last year's merger of the security and identity teams. I also think that the upcoming "Geneva" - now Windows Identity Foundation - will be pivotal for Microsoft and the industry.

In John Fontana's article there's an interesting quote from Bob Muglia I'd like to highlight:

We (Microsoft) don't see ourselves as providing the only solution that an enterprise customer needs for security...

I think most customers would agree with this. In fact, Bob really needed to add "and identity" to that statement. Nearly every customer I meet with has multiple identity management products deployed. In fact, at one customer I recently met with they had three different self-service password reset solutions deployed. Many of the customers I meet with have also deployed Microsoft's identity lifecycle product too (MMS, MIIS or ILM). When I quiz them on what scenarios they are solving with the Microsoft product the most typical response is "GAL sync" yet the company has also deployed a non-Microsoft identity product or framework for the enterprise.

In talking with these teams I have found that in many cases the "Windows", "Active Directory" or "Microsoft" team at an enterprise holds enough power or influence to dictate what is used in their own environment but not enough power or influence at the corporate level to dictate what is used for identity management.

Bob Muglia states that he doesn't see Microsoft providing the only solution that an enterprise customer needs for security. I don't see Microsoft providing the only solution that an enterprise customer needs for identity either.

Technorati Tags:
identity management, Geneva, ForeFront, Microsoft, MSFT, Windows Identity Foundation

Ten Risks of PKI

2009-09-22T05:26:00.000-07:00

This is an old article but it is a good article co-authored by Bruce Schneier. For those that don't know Bruce he is a well respected and acclaimed cryptographer. As Bruce says in the first few paragraphs about the sales guys who sell PKI:

“If you only buy X,” the sales pitch goes, “then you will be secure.”
But reality is never that simple, and that is especially true with PKI.

Many times we have customers who are considering going with certificates or smart cards rather than one-time passwords (OTP) as their means of two-factor authentication. Bruce does a great job of throwing light on some of the PKI/smart card "myths". Especially true is that for any security system there are people involved:

Security is a chain; it’s only as strong as the weakest link. The security of any CA-based system is based on many links and they’re not all cryptographic. People are involved.

So if you are interested in strong authentication take a look at this article. It's worth your time.

Technorati Tags:
security, two-factor authentication, QSFT, Quest Software, PKI

Quest and SAP Single Sign-on

2009-09-21T02:43:00.000-07:00

Someone pointed out a blog post on SAP Single Sign-on using Quest Authentication Services to me a few weeks ago and I thought I would share it with you. The author of the blog post - Joshua Fletcher - is a Senior Business Intelligence Consultant working in Perth, Australia primarily with SAP BusinessObjects software.

Joshua pointed his readers to a very detailed SAP technical note on how to set up SAP SSO with Quest Authentication Services here (you'll need an SAP support account to login). He also issued a small plea to SAP to better document the overall procedure:

If any SAP BusinessObjects staff read this post, it would be fantastic if all this knowledge that is being captured in the SAP Support Portal could be filtered and pushed back into the standard documentation, as this sorely lacks the detail required to implement Vintela SSO.

Joshua, I passed on your blog post and your request to SAP's senior identity management staff last week when I was at their headquarters in Walldorf, Germany. Hopefully, they'll follow-up!

Technorati Tags:
Quest Authentication Services, Quest Software, QSFT, VAS, Vintela, SAP, single sign-on, identity management