<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Jacob B. Sherman Law Office</title>
	
	<link>http://www.jbsherman.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JacobBShermanEsq" /><feedburner:info uri="jacobbshermanesq" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>JacobBShermanEsq</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Stop Online Piracy Act: SOPA what does it actually say</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~3/_m77iUi_wYE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectual-property/stop-online-piracy-act-sopa-what-does-it-actually-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jbsherman.com/?p=739</guid>
		<description>"Stop Online Piracy Act" ('SOPA'): now who could be against such a bill, surely good citizens do not want to promote piracy. How ironic that just when dictators are falling to internet based revolutions, the United States in embroiled in a fight over this bill which opponent give labels such as 'censorship' and proponents describe as protecting American industry.   Let's look at what the bill actually says.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~4/_m77iUi_wYE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectual-property/stop-online-piracy-act-sopa-what-does-it-actually-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectual-property/stop-online-piracy-act-sopa-what-does-it-actually-say/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=stop-online-piracy-act-sopa-what-does-it-actually-say</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Notable Intellectual Property Changes</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~3/2eNw2aywft0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/2011-notable-intellectual-property-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jbsherman.com/?p=717</guid>
		<description>A review of notable intellectual property law developments during 2011&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~4/2eNw2aywft0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/2011-notable-intellectual-property-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/2011-notable-intellectual-property-changes/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=2011-notable-intellectual-property-changes</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>TATTOO and TATUAJE trademark case: foreign equivalent doctrine</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~3/86Y-Exj8KUM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/tattoo-and-tatuaje-trademark-case-foreign-equivalent-doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jbsherman.com/?p=697</guid>
		<description>Just after my last post on the Foreign Equivalents Doctrine I read on &lt;a href="http://thettablog.blogspot.com/" title="The TTABlog" target="_blank"&gt;The TTABlog&lt;/a&gt; about a recent &lt;a href="http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/appeal/index.jsp" title="Trademark Trial and Appeals Board" target="_blank"&gt;Trademark Trial and Appeal Board&lt;/a&gt; decision focusing on the doctrine.  I will add my take below, but have a look at The TTABlog for more details.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~4/86Y-Exj8KUM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/tattoo-and-tatuaje-trademark-case-foreign-equivalent-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/tattoo-and-tatuaje-trademark-case-foreign-equivalent-doctrine/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=tattoo-and-tatuaje-trademark-case-foreign-equivalent-doctrine</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents and Trademarks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~3/sWhlLFZuItc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/doctrine-of-foreign-equivalents-and-trademarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jbsherman.com/?p=664</guid>
		<description>Increasingly, foreign words are used on trademarks in the United States.  The doctrine of foreign equivalents is used to evaluate a foreign language trademark. The doctrine allows the use of the English translation of a word to be used for trademark law analysis.  It has been inconsistently applied because it is a only a guideline.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JacobBShermanEsq/~4/sWhlLFZuItc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/doctrine-of-foreign-equivalents-and-trademarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jbsherman.com/intellectualproperty/doctrine-of-foreign-equivalents-and-trademarks/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=doctrine-of-foreign-equivalents-and-trademarks</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

