<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465</id><updated>2024-11-01T04:56:05.984-04:00</updated><category term="free picks"/><category term="MLB"/><category term="line value"/><category term="NFL"/><category term="NHL"/><category term="value"/><category term="SportsInsights"/><category term="NBA"/><category term="public sentiment"/><category term="college basketball"/><category term="college football"/><category term="Covers"/><category term="Who Will Win?"/><category term="pitching analysis"/><category term="totals"/><category term="book"/><category term="contrarian"/><category term="youth vs. age"/><category term="line movement"/><category term="Grand Salami"/><category term="NCAA hoops"/><category term="ugly play"/><category term="analytics"/><category term="academic"/><category term="against the spread"/><category term="betting tips"/><category term="big underdog"/><category term="sports investing"/><category term="spring training"/><category term="ATS"/><category term="March Madness Brackets"/><category term="Super Bowl"/><category term="WNBA"/><category term="moneyline"/><category term="playoffs"/><category term="revert to mean"/><category term="statistics"/><category term="young athlete"/><category term="BCS"/><category term="pools"/><category term="public perception"/><category term="selectivity"/><category term="syndicates"/><category term="media"/><category term="money management"/><category term="pendulum"/><category term="power ratings"/><category term="preseason"/><category term="run-line"/><category term="NY Times"/><category term="Wall St Journal"/><category term="betting percentage"/><category term="emotion"/><category term="financial trading"/><category term="home field"/><category term="over/under"/><category term="public team"/><category term="sharps"/><category term="smart money"/><category term="tennis"/><category term="BCDadvisors"/><category term="Billy Walters"/><category term="Bracket Science"/><category term="CBS 60 Minutes"/><category term="big favorite"/><category term="historical data"/><category term="horses"/><category term="injury overreaction"/><category term="key number"/><category term="line analysis"/><category term="point spread"/><category term="prime years"/><category term="rivalry"/><category term="sports psychology"/><category term="All-Star Game"/><category term="Kentucky Derby"/><category term="MIT"/><category term="Masters"/><category term="Stanley Cup"/><category term="Who Wins"/><category term="bankroll"/><category term="baseball"/><category term="betting trend"/><category term="boxing"/><category term="computer model"/><category term="defense"/><category term="diversification"/><category term="futures"/><category term="golf"/><category term="large underdogs"/><category term="leadership"/><category term="longshot-favorite bias"/><category term="marketplace"/><category term="misleading stats"/><category term="momentum"/><category term="motivation"/><category term="multiple factors"/><category term="panic value"/><category term="probability"/><category term="props"/><category term="recent performance"/><category term="red-hot"/><category term="sports betting"/><category term="unit size"/><title type='text'>Jim Cee Sports</title><subtitle type='html'>Sports betting tips &amp;amp; systems (and even some free picks) based on academic research and contrarian approaches.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default?redirect=false'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>334</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-5386520484936973002</id><published>2015-01-29T14:07:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2015-01-29T14:07:14.793-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NFL"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pools"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Super Bowl"/><title type='text'>Super Bowl 49: Seattle and Under</title><content type='html'>I haven&#39;t been posting as often, but it is SUPER BOWL time! &amp;nbsp;I like Seattle and the Under in this year&#39;s Super Bowl. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The public is on New England to the tune of almost three out of every four bets. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The Patriots have been hot and even with DeflateGate, many think that Belichick&#39;s Patriots are just too smart; a step ahead of the rest. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;As usual, I like value -- and love last year&#39;s champs with the point or as a moneyline play. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The Patriots hot streak since the first third of the season may represent value. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For those interested in a &quot;flyer&quot; -- I would take the Seahawks in a blowout. &amp;nbsp;Seattle &quot;big&quot; and the under -- can be parlayed. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some analysis I like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;From the Sporting News: The &quot;Linemakers&quot; columns states that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://linemakers.sportingnews.com/nfl/2015-01-28/super-bowl-betting-line-point-spread-patriots-seahawks-odds-vegas-total&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;sharps are on Seattle and the Under&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://quantfacts.sportsblog.com/posts/1716839/super_bowl_xlix__2015___who_will_win_the_big_game_.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Sports psychology&lt;/a&gt; angle I like because they offer a different edge -- are on Seattle.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If you are in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://quantfacts.sportsblog.com/posts/1688009/2015_super_bowl_square_pools__by_quarter_.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Square Pool, here are some interesting probabilities&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5386520484936973002'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5386520484936973002'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2015/01/super-bowl-49-seattle-and-under.html' title='Super Bowl 49: Seattle and Under'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-4527815185587549541</id><published>2014-04-05T16:33:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2014-04-05T16:33:34.226-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="college basketball"/><title type='text'>Final Four - 2014 March Madness</title><content type='html'>In today&#39;s semifinal games, I like U-Conn +7 and the Under 127. &amp;nbsp;Some decent points for an expected low-scoring game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the later game, I like Kentucky -1 (line has ticked down to -1 at some books!) and Over 138.5. &amp;nbsp;It&#39;s been a great tournament as usual, and I am psyched for today&#39;s games. </content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/4527815185587549541'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/4527815185587549541'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2014/04/final-four-2014-march-madness.html' title='Final Four - 2014 March Madness'/><author><name>cc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06626822887778403895</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-6787251447016553855</id><published>2014-01-27T15:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-27T15:52:00.822-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NFL"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pools"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Super Bowl"/><title type='text'>Super Bowl Pool </title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
I love pools -- so check this out: Square Pool Odds -- by quarter! &amp;nbsp;Hope I get that 0, 3 or 4! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2014/01/27/2014-super-bowl-square-pool-probabilities-by-quarter/&quot;&gt;http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2014/01/27/2014-super-bowl-square-pool-probabilities-by-quarter/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will have my Super Bowl picks up in a few days. &amp;nbsp;I can tell you that I am on the under! &amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/6787251447016553855'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/6787251447016553855'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2014/01/super-bowl-pool.html' title='Super Bowl Pool '/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-5293797912043727472</id><published>2014-01-19T12:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-19T15:51:58.713-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NFL"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="recent performance"/><title type='text'>NFL Championship Games</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
I am joining the side of the books! &amp;nbsp;I like both slight favorites. &amp;nbsp;Many fans and analysts are jumping on SF and NE&#39;s bandwagon because of their recent good -- and Seattle and Denver&#39;s slightly lesser play. &amp;nbsp;However, research has shown that recent performance is often overrated. &amp;nbsp;I am giving the small points. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taking Denver and NE; also lean the unders. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5293797912043727472'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5293797912043727472'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2014/01/nfl-championship-games.html' title='NFL Championship Games'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-7395680925491624383</id><published>2014-01-16T15:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-27T15:52:17.451-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tennis"/><title type='text'>Tennis, anyone?</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
Here&#39;s a great story on this quant dude betting on tennis (!!). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2d2b2c; font-family: akzidenz-grotesk-std-bloom; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3125em; margin-bottom: 28px;&quot;&gt;
For someone who says he bets millions of dollars on tennis a year, sports gambler Elihu Feustel doesn’t watch many matches.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2d2b2c; font-family: akzidenz-grotesk-std-bloom; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3125em; margin-bottom: 28px;&quot;&gt;
“Which one is Granollers?” Feustel says, referring to Marcel Granollers, a Spaniard ranked 35th in the world. “Is he the one that’s good on clay courts?”&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2d2b2c; font-family: akzidenz-grotesk-std-bloom; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3125em; margin-bottom: 28px;&quot;&gt;
Feustel, from&amp;nbsp;&lt;a density=&quot;sparse&quot; href=&quot;http://topics.bloomberg.com/south-bend/&quot; style=&quot;box-sizing: border-box; color: #003399; cursor: pointer; font-weight: 700; outline: none; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;South Bend&lt;/a&gt;, Indiana, says he doesn’t need to pay attention to who the players on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a density=&quot;full&quot; href=&quot;http://www.atpworldtour.com/&quot; rel=&quot;external&quot; style=&quot;box-sizing: border-box; color: #003399; cursor: pointer; font-weight: 700; outline: none; text-decoration: none;&quot; title=&quot;Open Web Site&quot;&gt;men’s ATP World Tour&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;are to double his money. He relies on an algorithm he created using data from 260,000 matches to make about 30 bets a day on Grand Slams such as the Australian Open, which started Jan. 13.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2d2b2c; font-family: akzidenz-grotesk-std-bloom; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3125em; margin-bottom: 28px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2d2b2c; font-family: akzidenz-grotesk-std-bloom; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3125em; margin-bottom: 28px;&quot;&gt;
Check this out:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2d2b2c; font-family: akzidenz-grotesk-std-bloom; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3125em; margin-bottom: 28px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-15/tennis-quant-s-system-doubles-his-money-without-knowing-players.html&quot;&gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-15/tennis-quant-s-system-doubles-his-money-without-knowing-players.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7395680925491624383'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7395680925491624383'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2014/01/tennis-anyone.html' title='Tennis, anyone?'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-5084072544941832293</id><published>2014-01-02T00:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-09T00:02:36.625-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BCS"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="betting percentage"/><title type='text'>BCS -- take the points</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
In this year&#39;s BCS game, I like Auburn and the points. &amp;nbsp;Too many people are expecting a blowout for Florida State. &amp;nbsp;Although the public is more on Auburn than I would like, I like the fact that Auburn played a much tougher schedule than Florida State. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked up some stats -- and this is the widest spread in terms of strength of schedule (SOS) ever in a BCS national championship game. &amp;nbsp;AND -- when there has been a reasonable spread in terms of SOS, the team that played the tougher schedule has gone 4-0 or 5-1, depending on the spread you look at...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look for a closer game than expected and take the points. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5084072544941832293'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5084072544941832293'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2014/01/bcs-take-points.html' title='BCS -- take the points'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-4871553868926275254</id><published>2013-11-15T11:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2013-11-15T11:50:09.928-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="betting tips"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="selectivity"/><title type='text'>Don&#39;t Bet the House: When it goes too far!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
Crazy story at Yahoo.com...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;&quot;&gt;Betting on football matches has long been an integral part of the game for supporters but Henry Dhabasani&#39;s attempts to &#39;make things a little more interesting&#39; have had dire consequences.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;&quot;&gt;Dhabasani, of the Iganga district of Eastern Uganda, has lost his home as a result of Manchester United&#39;s 1-0 victory over Arsenal on Sunday after a high-stakes wager with a neighbour.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;&quot;&gt;Fellow local and United fan Rashid Yiga put up his car and wife as collateral in the deal, emerging the victor on the back of Robin van Persie&#39;s 27th-minute header at Old Trafford.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/news/extra-time-arsenal-supporter-left-homeless-manchester-united-184100023--spt.html&quot;&gt;http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/news/extra-time-arsenal-supporter-left-homeless-manchester-united-184100023--spt.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/4871553868926275254'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/4871553868926275254'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/11/dont-bet-house-when-it-goes-too-far.html' title='Don&#39;t Bet the House: When it goes too far!'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-7303429545615915465</id><published>2013-09-09T14:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2013-09-09T14:57:01.540-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="momentum"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tennis"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="value"/><title type='text'>2013 US Open - Men&#39;s Final</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
In the Men&#39;s Final, I see some good value on Novak Djokovic. &amp;nbsp;Rafael Nadal has been ridiculously hot, but also sometimes inconsistent (like the first round loss at Wimbledon) since his return from injury. &amp;nbsp;Historically, based on their styles of play, Djokovic is a better player on hard courts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Djoko is a slight underdog because Nadal has been so hot. &amp;nbsp;We like that value and see Djokovic as an undervalued number one seed. &amp;nbsp;Some bettors might like to take the +120 that we have seen on Djoko, while others may prefer the spread (typically based on sets, sometimes on games). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be a great match. &amp;nbsp;Enjoy! &amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7303429545615915465'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7303429545615915465'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/09/2013-us-open-mens-final.html' title='2013 US Open - Men&#39;s Final'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-9078886387786892810</id><published>2013-06-21T09:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2013-06-21T09:55:32.118-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NHL"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="playoffs"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Stanley Cup"/><title type='text'>NHL Finals - 2013</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
At this point in the series, I LOVE the Black Hawks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides Game Three, the Black Hawks have been outplaying the Bruins, with the B&#39;s being held in the games by hot goaltending. &amp;nbsp;When the goaltending evens out -- I think we&#39;ll see a big win by the Black Hawks on Saturday, a Stanley Cup parade in the Windy City. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Hawks in 6. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/9078886387786892810'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/9078886387786892810'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/06/nhl-finals-2013.html' title='NHL Finals - 2013'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-3478027420509400927</id><published>2013-06-06T20:13:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2013-06-06T20:13:50.911-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="leadership"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBA"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Who Will Win?"/><title type='text'>NBA Finals - 2013</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
I like the Miami Heat for many reasons. &amp;nbsp;Although some are comparing two great players, Lebron James is in his prime -- and will most likely go down in history as one of the very all-time greats. &amp;nbsp;I believe that Lebron James will lead his team to another title. &amp;nbsp;Miami is hurting a bit, but the age of the Spurs makes up for this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like the Heat in 5 games, although I enjoyed the probabilities in this article: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/keeping-score-key-statistics-favor-heat/&quot;&gt;http://offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/keeping-score-key-statistics-favor-heat/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would also take the Heat vs. the spread as I believe that there is value.&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/3478027420509400927'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/3478027420509400927'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/06/nba-finals-2013.html' title='NBA Finals - 2013'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-6714560665336862468</id><published>2013-04-08T18:01:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2013-04-08T18:01:46.796-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="college basketball"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Who Will Win?"/><title type='text'>March Madness Finals (4/8/13)</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
I am taking Michigan plus the points in tonight&#39;s College Basketball final. &amp;nbsp;Michigan has played one of the toughest schedules in college basketball -- and has a dangerous 3-point FG percentage. &amp;nbsp;Several of my sources -- and I -- expect this game to be a tossup, so I love getting the dog plus four points. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the analysts that I follow, the &quot;Who Will Win&quot; authors have this as their prediction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: georgia, &#39;times new roman&#39;, times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;&quot;&gt;Based on our championship factors and season statistics, we developed a Monte Carlo simulator for college basketball,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/keeping-score-what-stats-and-simulations-say-about-the-super-bowl/&quot; style=&quot;background-color: white; color: #666699; font-family: georgia, &#39;times new roman&#39;, times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;&quot;&gt;similar to the methodology we used for our football analyses&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: georgia, &#39;times new roman&#39;, times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;&quot;&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The most frequently-occurring score was&amp;nbsp; Louisville 70, Michigan 69.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whowillwinthebiggame.blogspot.com/2013/04/ncaa-mens-championship-game-2013.html&quot;&gt;http://whowillwinthebiggame.blogspot.com/2013/04/ncaa-mens-championship-game-2013.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/6714560665336862468'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/6714560665336862468'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/04/march-madness-finals-4813.html' title='March Madness Finals (4/8/13)'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-6901953510452087899</id><published>2013-03-20T14:03:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2013-03-20T14:03:58.391-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="March Madness Brackets"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NCAA hoops"/><title type='text'>Some Good Info for Your NCAA Brackets</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
Here are results for the Round of 64 in the Big NCAA Tournament. &amp;nbsp;I am using these historical odds in combination with point spreads for my first round picks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting at Seed 5 and lower, the better seed is 66% or less to win their first round game! &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnsAr9S-QB_AdEdmWm9QTTRfTVhER0ZGTUlYb3F2RGc#gid=0&quot;&gt;https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnsAr9S-QB_AdEdmWm9QTTRfTVhER0ZGTUlYb3F2RGc#gid=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/6901953510452087899'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/6901953510452087899'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/03/some-good-info-for-your-ncaa-brackets.html' title='Some Good Info for Your NCAA Brackets'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-2968277004835354695</id><published>2013-01-29T14:08:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2013-01-29T14:08:40.048-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sports investing"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Super Bowl"/><title type='text'>Super Bowl 47</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
The big game is approaching, and I will be on the San Francisco 49ers. &amp;nbsp;Some analysts point to the Ravens&#39; momentum, but I don&#39;t see that besides a few big wins in the playoffs. &amp;nbsp;Anything can happen in a small sample size, but I believe we&#39;ll see a reversion to the mean -- and see a blowout win for the 49ers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
San Francisco has been consistently good this season, and I believe we may see a blowout win like we used to see in the 80&#39;s and 90&#39;s. &amp;nbsp;Here are some books I have helped to write. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;iframe frameborder=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&amp;amp;bc1=000000&amp;amp;IS2=1&amp;amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;amp;fc1=000000&amp;amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;amp;t=sportsinves03-20&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;p=8&amp;amp;l=as4&amp;amp;m=amazon&amp;amp;f=ifr&amp;amp;ref=ss_til&amp;amp;asins=160970004X&quot; style=&quot;height: 240px; width: 120px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;iframe frameborder=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&amp;amp;bc1=000000&amp;amp;IS2=1&amp;amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;amp;fc1=000000&amp;amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;amp;t=sportsinves03-20&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;p=8&amp;amp;l=as4&amp;amp;m=amazon&amp;amp;f=ifr&amp;amp;ref=ss_til&amp;amp;asins=1609700082&quot; style=&quot;height: 240px; width: 120px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;


&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/2968277004835354695'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/2968277004835354695'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/01/super-bowl-47.html' title='Super Bowl 47'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-598964115212717568</id><published>2013-01-02T20:05:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2013-01-02T20:05:46.213-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BCS"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="college football"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="line analysis"/><title type='text'>2013 BCS: Alabama vs. Notre Dame</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
As we near this year&#39;s BCS Championship game, there are plenty of story lines. &amp;nbsp;We like Alabama to win big in this game. &amp;nbsp;We&#39;ll wait for some of our regular sources, to add to our analysis and level of betting, but we definitely prefer the Crimson Tide. &amp;nbsp;Sure, Notre Dame is undefeated and eked out Alabama to have the best defense in the nation. &amp;nbsp;However, Alabama also has one of the nation&#39;s best offenses, while ND&#39;s offense is below average. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ND &quot;D&quot; might be able to hold off Alabama more than most teams. &amp;nbsp;We see the teams evenly-matched on D -- BUT Alabama&#39;s O is much better than Notre Dame&#39;s. &amp;nbsp;Some would say that Alabama&#39;s stats are even under-rated due to Coach Saban not running up the score. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alabama has two 1,000 yard rushers and a QB with a 173 QB rating. &amp;nbsp;Notre Dame, of course, is not a pushover, but Alabama has been winning big for several years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of sports marketplace action,&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt; there are indications of syndicates taking Alabama to roll over Notre Dame. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;Most bets are on ND, but the line has become extended in Alabama&#39;s favor. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here (will add more as we come across good articles):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/21486098/best-dynasty-ever-alabama-can-close-its-case-with-another-title&quot;&gt;http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/21486098/best-dynasty-ever-alabama-can-close-its-case-with-another-title&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/598964115212717568'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/598964115212717568'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-bcs-alabama-vs-notre-dame.html' title='2013 BCS: Alabama vs. Notre Dame'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-8356895217682830206</id><published>2012-10-25T14:11:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2012-10-25T14:11:55.300-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="MLB"/><title type='text'>2012 World Series</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
We like the &quot;Who Will Win&quot; analysis as a different angle for championships... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The analysis points to Detroit, based on pitching leadership and fielding consistency. &amp;nbsp;Read more here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/677712-carlton-chin/1209051-the-2012-world-series-analysis-of-sports-psychology-factors&quot;&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/677712-carlton-chin/1209051-the-2012-world-series-analysis-of-sports-psychology-factors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, this year&#39;s World Series matches up one team that swept their semi-final series (Detroit) versus a team that went to 7 games. &amp;nbsp;Since MLB went to divisions in 1969 (and the MLB playoffs included at least a semi-final round) -- we were curious how teams fared based on how well they performed in the semi-final round. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we might expect in these short series, there was no definitive answer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Teams that swept the semi-final round (in 3 or 4 games) and played against a team that needed more games to get to the World Series (2 or more games longer) -- are just 4-6 in the World Series.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;On the other hand, teams that took 2 or fewer games to get to the World Series than their opponents (in the semis) are 8-6 in the World Series (this includes the 4-6 sweepers). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;That is, teams that had an easier semi-final generally performed better in the World Series -- unless they swept the semis!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/8356895217682830206'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/8356895217682830206'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/10/2012-world-series.html' title='2012 World Series'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-2008510165968988213</id><published>2012-06-13T15:37:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-06-13T15:37:38.820-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBA"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="value"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Who Will Win?"/><title type='text'>2012 NBA Finals</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
I like Miami in the NBA finals. &amp;nbsp;With Oklahoma City up one game to none (winning at home), there is also additional value on a futures/series play. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Game 1, Miami led for much of the game, until OKC&#39;s big run at the end of the 3rd quarter. &amp;nbsp;Although OKC is favored, we like the value on Miami. &amp;nbsp;Miami&#39;s defense, experience in last year&#39;s finals -- to me -- makes them a better overall team. &amp;nbsp;We will see -- but I am on Miami!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here&#39;s the &quot;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Who Will Win&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&quot; analysis that I like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/keeping-score-reading-statistics-like-tea-leaves/&quot;&gt;http://offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/keeping-score-reading-statistics-like-tea-leaves/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/2008510165968988213'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/2008510165968988213'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/06/2012-nba-finals.html' title='2012 NBA Finals'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-5714942361733967722</id><published>2012-04-26T18:53:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2012-04-26T18:54:31.365-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BCS"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="college football"/><title type='text'>Final Four: ALSO in College Football?!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
Check this out: the BCS looks like it will FINALLY get a playoff going for the College Football National Championship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;
Leaders of the Bowl Championship Series will present to their constituents the option of a four-team college football playoff beginning in 2015, BCS executive director Bill Hancock said Thursday afternoon.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;mceTemp&quot; style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; line-height: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;

&lt;dl class=&quot;wp-caption alignleft caption-alignleft &quot; style=&quot;float: left; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 27px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; width: 262px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;dt class=&quot;wp-caption-dt&quot; style=&quot;margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;size-full wp-image-5&quot; height=&quot;174&quot; src=&quot;http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-ST037_042612_D_20120426154727.jpg&quot; style=&quot;border-bottom-style: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-left-style: none; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-style: none; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-style: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-width: initial; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 8px;&quot; width=&quot;262&quot; /&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd class=&quot;wp-caption-dd wp-cite-dd&quot; style=&quot;color: #666666; font-size: 1em; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 2px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 2px; text-align: right;&quot;&gt;Associated Press&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dd class=&quot;wp-caption-dd&quot; style=&quot;color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 2px;&quot;&gt;Bowl Championship Series executive director Bill Hancock&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;
Hancock said commissioners from the BCS conferences will present to conference constituents two to seven options for a four-team playoff. Those options include holding semifinals at campus sites, as well as neutral-site games. A championship game will be held at a neutral site, either an existing bowl or a site that bids in advance to host the game.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;
Hancock acknowledged that if a four-team playoff is approved by the 11 participating conferences and the BCS’s presidential oversight committee, it will be a “seismic event.” Major-college football never has had a playoff. BCS leaders have ruled out 16- and eight-team playoffs.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2012/04/26/college-football-bcs-bosses-want-four-team-playoff/?mod=WSJBlog&quot;&gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2012/04/26/college-football-bcs-bosses-want-four-team-playoff/?mod=WSJBlog&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5714942361733967722'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/5714942361733967722'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/04/final-four-also-in-college-football.html' title='Final Four: ALSO in College Football?!'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-1871709587111130486</id><published>2012-04-02T09:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-04-02T09:29:06.402-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="college basketball"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NCAA hoops"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SportsInsights"/><title type='text'>2012 NCAA Championship Game</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;In tonight&#39;s game, I like Kentucky to win the championship, and locked in Kentucky -6. &amp;nbsp;Both teams are powerhouses -- and some say that Kentucky is one of the best in history. &amp;nbsp;I wouldn&#39;t argue with that because Kentucky excels on both sides of the court -- with excellent FG% and Three-point shooting % -- as well as the same stats on the defensive side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sports Insights&#39; betting percentages point to Kansas as a contrarian play, and there is some slight line value based on the opening line -- but we grabbed the -6 to prevent any further line slippage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On championship games, we also like the &quot;Who Will Win&quot; analysis -- which points to Kentucky as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/1871709587111130486'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/1871709587111130486'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/04/2012-ncaa-championship-game.html' title='2012 NCAA Championship Game'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-63302856145584284</id><published>2012-03-14T20:43:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-03-14T20:43:18.215-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="March Madness Brackets"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SportsInsights"/><title type='text'>The National Bracket (2012 March Madness)</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Here&#39;s some good March Madness info:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We love this link: the &quot;National Bracket&quot; which shows the cumulative entries -- so you can pick where others are not!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://games.espn.go.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/en/nationalBracket?entryID=4725386&quot;&gt;http://games.espn.go.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/en/nationalBracket?entryID=4725386&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some good ideas and numbers:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sportsinsights.com/images2/SportsInsights_Expert_Bracketology_Guide.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.sportsinsights.com/images2/SportsInsights_Expert_Bracketology_Guide.pdf&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Our favorite March Madness website for bracket pools:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt;ESPN.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt;CBSsports.com &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/63302856145584284'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/63302856145584284'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/03/national-bracket-2012-march-madness.html' title='The National Bracket (2012 March Madness)'/><author><name>rs</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05370617916702156262</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-3088795478060185100</id><published>2012-03-01T18:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-03-01T18:52:58.317-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="MIT"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NCAA hoops"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SportsInsights"/><title type='text'>Fading Kentucky -- March Madness is here!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;March Madness is here -- and even the conference championship games has us fired up! &amp;nbsp;We loved &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sportsinsights.com/sports-betting-articles/bet-sharp/2012/kentucky-basketball-contrarian-betting.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this analysis by Sports Insights&lt;/a&gt; -- and will be fading Kentucky tonight. &amp;nbsp;Take the big points and fade Kentucky -- and hope Georgia can stay with top-ranked Kentucky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I helped to put together a paper for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sloansportsconference.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;MIT Sloan Sports Analytics conference&lt;/a&gt; that starts tomorrow. &amp;nbsp;You can find &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sportsinsights.com/promos/covers/betting-analysis-covers.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the paper here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/3088795478060185100'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/3088795478060185100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/03/fading-kentucky-march-madness-is-here.html' title='Fading Kentucky -- March Madness is here!'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-7507821684088451569</id><published>2012-02-04T21:30:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-04T21:30:16.021-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Covers"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SportsInsights"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Super Bowl"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Who Will Win?"/><title type='text'>2012 Super Bowl (Patriots - Giants)</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;My free play is on New England to cover the spread against the Giants. &amp;nbsp;I especially love this if you can get NE -2.5. &amp;nbsp;The key 3 number takes some excess value out of the picture, but I still love NE -3. &amp;nbsp;The Giants have come on strong -- but are less consistent than the Patriots. &amp;nbsp;I would take Brady over Eli Manning any day... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is some good coverage of the Super Bowl:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ol style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/02/weekend-sports-update-super-bowl/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SportsInsights&#39; Super Bowl blog&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;summary. &amp;nbsp;I read all of the links in this post: &amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/02/weekend-sports-update-super-bowl/&quot;&gt;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/02/weekend-sports-update-super-bowl/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whowillwinthebiggame.blogspot.com/2012/02/super-bowl-info.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Who Will Win&lt;/a&gt;: I love these sports psychology angles for a different edge.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.covers.com/articles/articles.aspx?theArt=262791&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Covers&#39; Super Bowl coverage&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7507821684088451569'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7507821684088451569'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/02/2012-super-bowl-patriots-giants.html' title='2012 Super Bowl (Patriots - Giants)'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-879378367654722970</id><published>2012-01-22T11:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-22T11:42:47.550-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Covers"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NFL"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="playoffs"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SportsInsights"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Who Will Win?"/><title type='text'>2012 NFL Conference Championships</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;In today&#39;s AFC &amp;amp; NFC Championship games, we like San Francisco and Baltimore to beat the spread -- and perhaps even for Baltimore to advance to the Super Bowl against SF. &amp;nbsp;New England is an interesting story; they have looked old and weaker earlier in the season, but then finished strongly -- but against an over-rated and generally weak schedule. &amp;nbsp;Thus, we like Baltimore a lot in the AFC game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the NFC game, we think it can potentially be a blowout -- for a strong 49er team with the top-ranked NFL defense -- against an over-achieving Giant team. &amp;nbsp;Here are some links to info we like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://whowillwinthebiggame.blogspot.com/2012/01/who-will-win-nfc-championship-game.html&quot;&gt;http://whowillwinthebiggame.blogspot.com/2012/01/who-will-win-nfc-championship-game.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/01/weekend-sports-update-16/&quot;&gt;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/01/weekend-sports-update-16/&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.covers.com/articles/columns/articles.aspx?theArt=262219&quot;&gt;http://www.covers.com/articles/columns/articles.aspx?theArt=262219&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/879378367654722970'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/879378367654722970'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/01/2012-nfl-conference-championships.html' title='2012 NFL Conference Championships'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-1817406442014976123</id><published>2012-01-09T18:10:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-09T18:14:00.605-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BCS"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="college football"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Who Will Win?"/><title type='text'>BCS Game: #1 LSU vs. #2 Alabama</title><content type='html'>We like Alabama in the big game tonight.  It will be interesting to see how the #1 defense (Alabama) does...  but I like them!  Also check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://whowillwinthebiggame.blogspot.com/2012/01/who-will-win-2012-bcs-championship.html&quot;&gt;Who Will Win analysis&lt;/a&gt;.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/1817406442014976123'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/1817406442014976123'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/01/bcs-game-1-lsu-vs-2-alabama.html' title='BCS Game: #1 LSU vs. #2 Alabama'/><author><name>cc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06626822887778403895</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-7877441754339978329</id><published>2012-01-07T04:50:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-08T11:12:14.097-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NFL"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="smart money"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SportsInsights"/><title type='text'>Free Play: NFL Wildcard Weekend (1/7/12)</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;Happy New Year!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here&#39;s a nice mention of the Sports Investing Books at Sports Insights -- plus a great betting angle. &amp;nbsp;We like Atlanta as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;Please take a look at&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sportsinsights.com/bookreviews/booklist.aspx&quot; style=&quot;color: black; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot; title=&quot;Sports Investing books&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em style=&quot;margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;Sports Insights’ series of books on Sports Investing&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that highlight some of the sports betting trends that we look at — that drive our betting strategies — and have helped create seven years of winning NFL plays.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;With the playoffs starting, there are fewer games on the board, so we called one of our&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em style=&quot;margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;offshore line managers.&amp;nbsp; He had the Falcons-Giants game circled and said, “Some early sharps are on the Falcons and that pushed the line towards the Falcons even though the smaller bettors are on the Giants.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;tr_bq&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em style=&quot;margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;The betting percentages are not as lopsided as we would like, but we like the “smart money line movement” especially on the huge key number of three (3).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/01/weekend-sports-update-focus-on-nfl/&quot;&gt;http://sportsinsights.com/blog/2012/01/weekend-sports-update-focus-on-nfl/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7877441754339978329'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/7877441754339978329'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2012/01/free-play-nfl-wildcard-weekend-1712.html' title='Free Play: NFL Wildcard Weekend (1/7/12)'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3534939970903784465.post-3341139376370482315</id><published>2011-12-22T19:57:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-22T19:57:19.994-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NFL"/><title type='text'>Thursday Night Football Free Play 12/22/11</title><content type='html'>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;Happy holidays! Our free play for our readers is the over in the Thursday night football game. &amp;nbsp;Over 40 in the Indy-Houston game. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/3341139376370482315'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3534939970903784465/posts/default/3341139376370482315'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimceesports.blogspot.com/2011/12/thursday-night-football-free-play.html' title='Thursday Night Football Free Play 12/22/11'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>