<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Jim Chen: SSRN abstracts</title>
	<description>Jim Chen: SSRN abstracts Feed Digest</description><link>http://app.feed.informer.com/digest3/JimChenSSRN.html</link>
											<copyright>Respective post owners and feed distributors</copyright>
											<generator>http://feed.informer.com/</generator>

<item>
	<title>New&amp;#58; Truth and Beauty&amp;#58; A Legal Translation</title>
	<description>This essay addresses questions of truth and beauty&#44; of poetry and fidelity&#44; as applied to legal education and ultimately to law&#46;  After discussing how law schools can most faithfully translate their teachings to lawyers' real concerns&#44; I shall ponder how the law itself reconciles its duty to truth with its practitioners' longing for beauty&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1157093</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1157093?</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>New&amp;#58; Telecommunications Mergers</title>
	<description>Telecommunications mergers are at once a historical mirror and a harbinger of the legal future&#46; Since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996&#44; no significant telecommunications merger has failed to receive regulatory approval in the United States&#46;&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has accelerated the trend toward consolidation and concentration&#46; Having devoted most of its energy on issues doomed to become technologically and economically obsolete&#44; the Act failed to anticipate the technological conditions &#40;especially the emergence of the Internet&#41; that drove telecommunications carriers to consolidate&#46; Nevertheless&#44; possible avenues for reform remain open should the federal government ever conclude that the anticompetitive potential of telecommunications mergers outweighs their salutary effects&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1143577</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1143577?</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>New&amp;#58; Law Among the Ruins</title>
	<description>Hurricane Katrina broke America's collective heart&#46; No previous natural disaster in the nation&#25;s history inflicted a grimmer toll&#46; The legendary city of New Orleans all but sank when its levees failed and the resulting storm surge drowned much of the city and many of its feeblest&#44; most vulnerable residents&#46; Katrina exposed flaws in virtually every aspect of disaster management at every level of American government&#46;  The magnitude and senselessness of the loss indicted American society for its callous disregard of social vulnerability&#46;&#10; &#10;There is no such thing as a natural disaster&#46;  Understanding the interplay of environmental events with social conditions holds the key to the optimal application of legal tools for preventing&#44; mitigating&#44; and remedying natural tragedies &#45; the grand social exercise called law among the ruins&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1138910</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1138910?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>New&amp;#58; Liberating 'Red Lion' from the Glass Menagerie of Free Speech Jurisprudence</title>
	<description>Red Lion Broadcasting Co&#46; v&#46; FCC&#44; 395 U&#46;S&#46; 367 &#40;1969&#41;&#44; decreed a medium&#45;specific approach to first amendment controversies involving radio and broadcast television&#46;  Although the Supreme Court has never applied Red Lion's scarcity rationale to any medium besides broadcasting&#44; the Court has frequently resolved free speech disputes by drawing analogies to broadcasting&#46;&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;Red Lion declared that courts should condition constitutional protection on the technological and economic characteristics of a regulated communications conduit&#46;  It specifically concluded that broadcasting&#44; as a conduit&#44; merited less rigorous first amendment review because of scarcity&#44; the historic extent of governmental involvement in broadcasting&#44; and the ongoing public interest in access to this intensely regulated medium&#46;  Most judicial and academic objections to Red Lion have addressed scarcity&#46;  This article takes aim instead at Red Lion's prescription of conduit&#45;specific first amendment review&#44; urging close &#46;&#46;&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1121043</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1121043?</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>REVISION&amp;#58; Biolaw&amp;#58; Cracking the Code</title>
	<description>The neologism &#34;biolaw&#34; describes all areas of law informed by the life sciences&#46; Health law&#44; bioethics&#44; environmental law&#44; natural resources law&#44; agricultural law&#44; food and drug law&#44; biotechnology&#44; law and neuroscience&#44; law and behavioral psychology&#44; and evolutionary analysis of law all share a common scientific core&#46;  Lawyers and legal scholars too often address these topics in isolation&#46; This piecemeal approach undermines the scientific cohesion that connects these areas of legal practice and theory&#46; The common core&#44; of course&#44; is biology &#45; all of the life sciences&#44; unified in pursuit of subjects considered worthy of legal attention&#46;&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;This essay defines biolaw  as the field of law and the life sciences in its entirety&#46; Part I of this essay will provide a brief guide to the various branches of biolaw&#46; Part II offers some thoughts on the intellectual significance of treating biolaw as a scientifically coherent enterprise&#46; In other words&#44; I will first define biolaw&#46; Then I will &#46;&#46;&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1115332</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1115332?</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>REVISION&amp;#58; The Most Dangerous Justice Rides into the Sunset</title>
	<description>In this essay&#44; our third and last in a series&#44; we employ our previously developed techniques to measure the power of the Justices in the Rehnquist Court over its full 11 year run&#46;  Once again&#44; Justice Kennedy rises to the top of our rankings&#44; as he had done earlier&#46; Our methods identify Justices Souter&#44; Breyer and Ginsburg as being notable either for their influence or lack thereof&#46; In addition&#44; we rejoin the debate on the connection between being the median justice and being the most powerful one&#46;  We question whether even the most sophisticated methods of finding the median justice are adequate to the task of assessing power on the Court&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1031146</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1031146?</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>REVISION&amp;#58; Beyond Food and Evil</title>
	<description>The mass marketing of foods derived from organisms modified through recombinant DNA technology has put extreme pressure on the interpretation and implementation of the United States' basic food safety law&#44; the venerable Food&#44; Drug &#38; Cosmetic Act&#46; In its classic form&#44; the FD&#38;CA reflects its Progressive and New Deal roots&#46; It vests enormous trust in a specialized agency&#44; the Food and Drug Administration&#44; which is presumed to have nonpareil expertise over food safety&#46; The political reality of GM foods&#44; however&#44; has placed the FD&#38;CA and its implementation by the FDA in severe tension with the Organic Foods Production Act and with commercial speech doctrine&#46;&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;Fear about food is one of the most deeply seated forms of behavioral protection against the natural world&#46;  It is precisely here&#44; where food comes into contact with notions of good and evil&#44; that the classic regulatory state must take its stand&#46;  The FDA's regulation of foods using rDNA technology upholds the best of the &#46;&#46;&#46;</description>
	<link>http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1005001</link>
	<source url="http://www.ssrn.com/rss/authors/2001/0710/68651.rss">SSRN Author: Jim Chen</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1005001?</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:00 GMT</pubDate>

</item>


</channel></rss>

