jimisroomUFOtv

Where to from here?

noreply@blogger.com (jimisroom) — Mon, 30 Mar 2026 09:13:00 +0000

After a little too much time has passed, I’m anxious to get back to posting on this blog.

Im still recovering from an accident which has made it much more difficult to write, so please bear with me.

Where to from here?

I’ll be sharing more about specific orb UFO-UAP experiences I’ve had over time.

I’ll be sharing some of the orb UFO-UAP data I’ve accumulated over the last several years. This includes the varying types and different behaviours I’ve observed and filmed.

I’ll also attempt to discuss the various issues around the very complex topic of ‘disclosure’. In the past several years I’ve been researching different angles of the topic, and there is so much more to it than the personality contests I see projected so much online.

And maybe I’ll get into some deeper answers as to what the orbs are.

And all the while I’ll do my best to keep it light hearted and fun. Hope you enjoy.

Please subscribe and share!

Jimi

Why Can't We Get A "Clear" Image of a UFO?

noreply@blogger.com (jimisroom) — Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:06:00 +0000

6 Frames of Shape Changing UAP near the Hollywood Bowl

Video

People Have Difficulty Focusing Because of the "Titter" Factor

Its Difficult to Use A Zoom Lens On A Moving Object

Nerves

Because You Can't Plan It

Many to Most Don't Have Software To Analyze

A-lot of UFOs Are Not "nuts and bolts" Objects...

Because of Visual Artifacts From Phase Between Dimensional Fields

People Won't Believe The "Clear" Ones Anyway

Maybe Its Just Not Time Yet - After I got the Nikon P900

I've heard the comment over and over again...

I'll see an interesting UAP video appear online, sometimes actually getting coverage on a major news broadcast.

A lot of people will marvel at it and maybe comment on a detail or two, but then inevitably someone gets a little snarky and pipes up with something like:

"Yeah, but...when is someone actually going to get a CLEAR shot of one?"

While I understand their frustration, the answer to this question is a little more complex than somebody just not "trying".

I live in a bit of a "hot spot" and have had enough experience trying to capture the anomalous activity overhead that I could at least help to answer this question.

Why can't we see a really clear picture of a "UFO"?

People Have Difficulty Focusing Because of the "Titter" Factor

A less nice way of saying it...alot of people's heads come close to imploding when talking about this. And then they just can't see.

Let's face it, its not an easy subject to talk about.

The foundation of alot of this lies in the acronym: "unidentified flying object" has been largely been construed as "flying saucer with little green man inside"... In actuality, it could be referring to a whole slew of things, but if you end of saying "UFO" to the wrong people at the wrong time, you can literally HEAR their hind quarters...well, "tighten".

Over the last several decades this has created nightmares for people who found themselves in a positions where they are forced to describe these objects. Pilots especially, were between a rock and a hard place... Following regulations reporting safety concerns is a requirement...but what if it makes you sound like you're hallucinating?

The same neurosis and paranoia even effects online groups...people who deliberately engage in online discourse on this subject! No one wants to sound "crazy", so the term eventually morphed to UAP, or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Sometimes you'll hear just, aerial anomaly. Then there are some SO afraid of sounding "nuts", they just call every UFO video they see a "drone" or a "balloon" (And I mean like EVERY one), and then spend the remaining time calling the experiencer a nut.

No doubt, I've had my share of people who won't even view my video before accusing me of posting a balloon. But when I press them to explain the physics and science of what they are accusing, they either reduce the conversation to insults and name-calling, or simply just disappear.

So much anger. If its so stressful for them why do these guys come to an online UAP discussion in the first place…?

Shouldn’t they be looking at something much more relaxing?

Like, say…puppies???

The point is by the end of the day, the comments can largely disintegrate into endless drivel about balloons and cgi hoaxes...

No scientific contribution. No data. No analysis of flight characteristics, surface appearance or possible spectra data. You find you won't learn a THING about UAPs. Nothing but a swamp of balloon conjecture... Seriously. This is the first huge barrier.

So here is a deliberate effort to carry a discussion about UAPs past the uncomfortable "titter" stage and bring in some data from experience.

And this is a great time to remind people that there is not the mass of balloons flying over downtown Hollywood on a daily basis. In fact, they don't vend them in the neighborhood because there are too many low flying planes overhead.

To be clear, this is not an article about "balloons", but about shape changing orb-UFOs...or energy masses that appear all over the Los Angeles area and across the US, and the several reasons why its hard to get a “clear image” of one.

The first major hurdle is in our minds....

And I have total compassion for that. Watching some online videos are mindblowing…you only BEGIN to realize how odd it was for the person filming it, right?

Then you have logistical issues, like:

Its Difficult to Use A Zoom Lens On A Moving Object

After my first major sighting which lasted around 10 minutes at Red Rock Canyon in Nv, I decided it was time to get a video camera with a strong zoom lens.

I got a 720p Canon FS300 with 41x optical zoom. This was back in 2010.

Since then, I've captured several unknown objects with it, and when I didn't happen to have it on hand, I used an iphone 5 or SE.

Despite the zoom strength or resolution of either, I've only been able to get into an object, "so-close".

Why?

Because it's hard to do!

Try filming a faraway plane in flight with a powerful zoom lens, tripod or not. You'll find that the closer you zoom into the object, the less you can move the camera without risking completely moving it out of frame. If the object is moving, its even harder.

Even if its moving slowly. Try doing this with a tripod and a powerful zoom on say, Venus. The closer you get in, the less time you have to film before it moves out of the way.

This was painfully obvious the day I was trying to capture this shape changing object with that same Canon in March of 2013. I was grateful to have gotten anything, because besides the zoom factor, I was also dealing with...

Nerves

Your heart-rate increases, the camera begins to shake a little, and that zoom shot is blown until you can calm down and try again. You breathe in deep, try to brace yourself against something large and steady...a fence, a gate, a tree, and try to keep the bright object in the viewfinder while zooming in.

While this is happening, your mind is fluctuating between complete calm to “what is that?!” over and over again. Eventually someone in the distance yelled they saw it. Time felt like it stood still and sped up..back and forth.

Even with a tripod, too many elements are coming together, and if you don't have a good sense of coordination, the sighting may well be over by the time you get the object in frame.

Because You Can't Plan It

Another reason why its hard to get a good shot: You can't plan this!

They...whatever they are...show up when they want to...often when least expected.

After the March 2013 sighting, I tried to carry my camera with me where ever I went...and nothing would show up. I’d watch and look and wait and nothing anomalous would appear…at all.

Then when I least expected it, perhaps during a zen walk for instance, an object that moved ever so weirdly would appear, and I wouldn’t have the Canon with me. I would have no choice but to pull out the iphone and try to film what I could.

While I would love to have a tripod and an optical zoom with me at all times, its just not possible. Even if I did, trying to get “set up” in time to get the shot would be just as impossible.

Many to Most Don't Have Software To Analyze

Often the person filming the object wont zoom in, so you'll just see a faraway dot moving in the sky.

With capable software, you can digitally zoom in to the object as well as slow down the frame rate. This allows you to get a better view of the flight characteristics and features that make it “anomalous”. Through the process of discovering this, we find that:

Videos Tell A Much Better Story Than a Few Stills

I mention this specifically because its quite common for people to post a still shot of their sighting, and then the viewer will have a rough time understanding what they’re looking at.

Before long the plastic bag, drones, birds and blob accusations start to fly…when if they were able to really look closely at things like motion, vector and changing surface texture, they might take pause.

With simple still shots, its very hard for the experience to translate because you really don't get a sense of the "movement" of these objects. Once you get a sense of how the objects are actually moving...oftentimes changing color and shape while they do, then it opens up even more doors to other data we might be able to analyze.

This is one of the most anomalous captures I’ve experienced filming. This object was immediately overhead as I walked outside. I filmed about two minutes before it flew out of eye-range towards the south.

Once again, I couldn’t have planned this if I had tried, and if I had not pulled out the iphone "right away" and used the optical zoom I never would have captured it at all.

A still appears to look like anything from a sphere to an angled looking orb.

A simple slow motion gif of the object changing direction shows much more…featuring a sparking on the corner as it curves right.

When watching the entire video which shows the long, medium and closeup views, you really get a sense of how anomalous this experience was. This object literally does the 90 and 45 degree angle turns often observed with these objects.

Once again, no one can always be carrying a tripod and a large camera with them, and in this case they wouldn't have gotten it set up in time to get this shot. I’m grateful to have had something with me to film it at all.

Another reason to take note, the majority of people writing about UFO sightings are referring to "night time" sightings, with the assumption that they never happen at daytime. This is a myth, and another reason to occasionally "look up" during the day. They are there a-lot of these objects that show up during the day as well.

One significant thing I’ve noticed, at least so far, in terms of the daytime sightings I’ve seen posted online, there seems to be some evidence that:

A-lot of UFOs Are Not "nuts and bolts" Objects...

Some of the most prevalent and unnecessary online abuse comes from people viewing a UFO video expecting to see a “nuts and bolts” craft.

Claiming to be coming from a "scientific approach", they will spend an incredible amount of energy accusing the poster of filming “balloons” (what else is new?) while completely ignoring the fact that the majority of anomalous objects filmed these days are probably are something much more complex…something more “biological” than nuts and bolts.

Yes…I know that’s a-lot and very “ooh-ahh”, so here’s a puppy for a little breathing time.

The fact is, over time, if you read contactee accounts where your average “Joe” has been taken aboard an ET spacecraft, the majority of them will say the ETs told them their craft are either biological or incorporate a huge amount of biological technology. (On the other hand, the ones who have encountered a nuts and bolts craft, and I mean literally with rivets and such, have probably seen a reverse engineered craft. Its just rumor, but good to be safe and not get too near it as several of those models have been known to be extremely radioactive! Just my personal speculation.)

Could these "orbs" be smaller versions of actual craft, or are they some kind of actual biological being we haven’t classified yet that can change form, colour, and opacity? Can they disappear at will, or are they crossing over into another bio field we can’t see with the naked eye? Are some of these objects actually intra-terrestrial as well?

It took me awhile to stop asking for help with investigating this from online groups who just wanted to talk about snark and balloons, and to really begin looking at a lot of videos….all data I could find…to see what "in common" people were filming.

I noticed most objects, at least ones captured in daytime, take on several forms of plasma. Some are light, some are orbs, some are dark orbs or energy, and some look metallic. (Indeed, since I had the experience filming the dark plasma orbs, I've seen them pop up in people's landscape videos having nothing to do with UAPs. In other words the person would be completely unaware they captured something until I pointed it out.)

When I finally tripped over the work of Jay Alfred, from his, Plasma Aliens From a Parallel Earth - Biological Ufos and Their Effects, I was elated to read his confirmation of my discoveries.

“Plasma UFOs can therefore appear shiny like metal (i.e. reflecting all the waves from external sources, including radio waves from radar which consequently appears “solid” to the radar), black (i.e. absorbing the waves and not re-emitting), translucent or transparent (i.e. allowing waves to pass through the plasma from external sources and/or light from within the plasma to emanate out from the plasma in the arc or glow modes). These plasma UFOs can therefore manipulate the de-gree of opacity and intensity of radiation of their bodies by changing their internal plasma frequencies (just as we can tense or relax our muscles) – allowing the bodies to apparently appear, disappear or fade away.”

So now we yet another “what if” to consider when trying to talk about supposed UFO captured on video. WE should always be asking “what kind”, and what the actual experience is like. So many of these encounters happen at synchronous and serendipitous times, there is no doubt a "conscious" element to them.

I am still trying to figure out how many of the "foo fighters" spotted by 40s pilots were orbs?

What about the sphere in a box UFOs as described by Navy pilots recently?

Several of the captures people are posting are of the “shape changing” orbs.

Once again, very difficult to translate or describe with still photographs…as in this experience filmed in West Hollywood in 2018.

A slow motion gif shows how this “orb” looked multi faceted, often manifesting with angular features, as well as flashing blue and red colours.

The entire video, while not the best edit, gives more of a context of the experience. I believe I filmed it for a little less than four minutes.

Its impossible for me to call this some kind of nuts and bolts craft, but its definitely unidentified and doesn't appear to be linked to any kind of earthlights from seismic activity or something like that. Those appear to last a much shorter time from what I've seen so far.

What IS common is a twisting movement to its field...a kind of torsion field in action, like this object filmed in Jan of 2018.

Is it possible that the supposed "drones" spotted at Gatwick Airport and others were the same as any of the "dark orbs" being filmed all over the world?

This gif shows an embossed version of a “dark orb” captured over Hollywood. Notice how the texture of the object changes as it spins, with an indention appearing on one side. This is no balloon, but a dark plasma orb changing shape. It actually changed colour as well.

The entire experience is posted here.

Some may be energy masses… Can they change or turn into solid objects?

I have no idea. But utilizing scientific methods includes looking at several of the characteristics mentioned above, with many, many videos from all over. At one point we will naturally begin to put the clues together.

Because of Visual Artifacts From Phase Between Dimensional Fields

Okay, this is where it gets REALLY weird…

….so I’m going to post a “puppy” here…just in case.

Believe it or not, there have been two contactees who have commented specifically on what they have been told about “UFO” images. They both have to do with witnessing/filming a phase shift between dimensions, and I find this completely fascinating.

We often hear about the “dimensions” that encase our collective reality. The New Agers have been speaking of an ongoing raise in vibration happening on the planet that will result into a collapse of dimensions, or an unveiling, or a collective raise in vibration depending on who you are talking to.

In a contactee account called The LaCerta File, the subterranean being interviewed is actually asked to analyze several images of UFOs. Of the one she deemed “authentic”, she stated…

“a levitating ship is generally hidden in a shifted-field condition that even distorts the colors or the forms according to alignment. It might perhaps sound strange, but hazy and spectrally-shifted photos are sometimes to be interpreted as an indication for a possibly authenticity.”

And then Andromedan contactee Alex Collier talks about “a shift” going on at this time, where the dimensions are in essence “collapsing” while the overall frequency is increasing.

Here he mentions “rods” and other etheric objects increasingly filmed by folks.

Q: When is the dimensional collapse starting?

A: It's already starting. What you are going to start hearing about in the near future are something called rods. These will be something that will be video-taped. What you will see will be large streaks shooting through the air that are etheric in nature but will be captured on tape. What you will be seeing is fourth and fifth density craft moving through space, not having the slightest clue that they are flying right through us.

That's because at that point you are beginning to see the implosion. You'll also see more "ghosts" and "apparitions", because those that are 'stuck' between fourth and fifth density will become more visible as our frequency starts to increase. A lot of them, unless they are healed and set free from their self-imposed 'prisons', will be exiting, transitioning.

This “rod” was captured with a Nikon P900 (that I mention below) between two buildings, at least 75 feet away flying between a 12 foot wide area.

Is this some kind of blend-over from the neighboring dimension?

This just a question. I don’t have the answer.

Here's another puppy just for safety...

People Won't Believe The "Clear" Ones Anyway

I’ve seen and experienced this several times. The more vivid or clear an image is…just enough to show a clear object between phase, the less people believe it and the more they will try to identify it as something else.

People get all angry and scream cgi and hoax, they try to sabotage your video ratings, and once again, you want to just pull out the puppy photos to calm things down.

People’s “identifications” will be all over the place, going from a balloon to a fuzzy plane to a hang-glider (sorry...no hang gliders over LA), to Photoshop, to Venus. Yes...really...someone told me the photo below is a daytime image of Venus. The time of day I filmed this, Venus was right next to the sun, and I would have burned my retinas out had I attempted to film it!

I'm not claiming this is a "space ship"...I have no idea what this is.

But its none of the things I've been accused of filming and posting.

The same thing went on with the Joshua Tree video.

Looking back, it was some kind of shape changing energy mass that morphed several times…appeared once by our truck,

then somehow swooped down and flew close to the ground towards the tree, then took off. It apparently wanted to be seen.

That's literally the best explanation I can provide, yet I’ve been accused of “faking” it. I don’t know cgi, and couldn’t “fake” this if I tried.

And, as usual, so much energy went into trying to identify this as a bug, hummingbird, cgi...anything but what it just WAS…that little if any word was discussed on actual video analysis or how to do so. And once again, I'm not the only one. This is common with most of the "clear" ones I've seen posted online.

People's brains largely go into "too much information" mode.

All this naturally didn’t prevent me from having the normal human response…maybe if I had a camera with a stronger zoom and present day resolution, I could maybe zoom in close to one of these.

Yeah..that's it…!

Maybe Its Just Not Time Yet - After I Got The Nikon P900

I got a Nikon P900. Of course I was very excited, living here in a UFO hotspot. I was looking forward to getting in closer to one of these orbs. I even had a tripod now. A good deal of the orbs I had seen were at a medium to low cloud level….all I had to do was “wait”..right?

Well, as I said before...you just can't plan this stuff.

It was a warm, clear evening and the sun was barely setting, so I grabbed the equipment and setup to film the moon. It was amazingly gorgeous, with a cobalt blue sky in the background, and the major zoom providing me with a view mostly relegated to telescopes. I never knew a camera would get in that close!

I filmed several passes...always taking great care to adjust the tripod so that it would capture most of the moon’s moving arc. At one point, there was a "feeling" that I might be filming just a bit more, but most of my focus was in keeping the moon in frame.

Once again...the closer you are zoomed in, the less "time" you have to film a moving object unless you have precision equipment you can follow it with. Even in this shot, there is a little shaking…coming directly from the breeze blowing on the camera. (Yes..I know I need a better tripod)

When I looked at the clips later that evening, I was astonished, amazed, a little intimidated, and humbled. Like kind of embarrassed…humbled. Like a joke had been played on me. I had been punk’d.

The view of the moon was spectacular...but there, in one of the clips, some seconds in, an object enters the screen from the left, and transits the moon...for over a minute!

I was like, “come on”! This IS a satellite, right?

I immediately checked the several satellite and space debris databases for that time...to see if what I was filming was some kind of a satellite. No go... Even Stellarium shows that absolutely no satellites were transiting the area at the time.

Comparing to other "moon transit" videos online, satellites move much faster and pass by in a fraction of a second. The captures of the ISS transiting the moon show the same thing.

On the other extreme its like, “so you thought you might get in close, huh? Well, let’s remind you what ‘close’ really is, and that you don’t plan this…!”

Okay…here’s a puppy just in case.

So…to ask again…why can’t we get a clear image of a UFO?

Where? How far away? When? I couldn’t have planned this in a million years. Other than the issues mentioned above…maybe its not “time” to get a clear image yet(?)

Back to square one...Only thing to do is keep accumulating and sharing grassroots data...

This is obviously a collective "journey", and we should treat it as thus instead of expecting easy answers from one central authority figure. We ultimately all have a piece of the puzzle, so we’ll assemble the larger picture mostly with and through each other.

Gratefully, there are several others out there who are sighting these objects and sharing their experiences. All of these help as frames of reference for others when they start to have their own encounters.

I truly believe that the closer we reach that critical mass of working together…in all fields…not just the study of UAPs…”they” will very much get closer and clearer to us all…but we’ll be ready!

Analyzing UFO Videos - Why That Utah "UFO" Footage Is Not a Bird - Falcon - Hawk

noreply@blogger.com (jimisroom) — Sat, 16 Feb 2019 20:06:00 +0000

There are times in life where we get a little bit of confirmation...a quiet little message whispering, don't worry...you're not the only one. And then I breathe a huge sigh of relief.

I recently had this experience when I happened upon the much talked about filmmakers drone footage taken in Utah. My mouth just dropped open. Finally I was watching someone have a similar experience as I have been having...down to the type of objects being filmed.

And not only that, there were several researchers actually taking it seriously for a minute and discussing it, up, around and thru trying to understand what they are seeing.

I take this a a bit of a personal victory and a-ha moment...now I get to "watch" prominent researchers go through the twists and turns of this rabbit hole like I have.

Looks Like Several Luminous Daytime UFO Captures

I took a look at the original video on YouTube several times. It had the characteristics of several daytime captures I have filmed of whitish objects over the last year.

A Very Bright Object - showing a luminousity during the daytime with a blue sky behind. The light can be with reflective or white, or will actually change colour.

Can Exhibit Hover, Slow, or Extreme Speed Flight Characteristics - although there have been some that have hovered or moved relatively slowly, others will streak in and out of the frame extremely fast. Several people will find captures like these in vacation videos...sometimes years later.

The video featured above here was sent in by a friend. A "white" object that changes shape streaks above the Thunderbirds demonstrating below. I've heard people both call this a bug or cgi, even though it makes noise. It is neither. I include it to provide some context. This also changes shape and moves extremely fast.

Change of texture - there can also a change of texture of the object. Another way of saying it would be that the surface features of the object change, with spots, holes, ports, slats, and even fractal patterns manifesting.

Unusual shape or changes shape - the object will often be spherical, cylindrical, rectangular, or may even have irregular angular features to it. Several objects change shape as they maneuver as in this one. The video above is a good example of this.

So basically, from my experience, there is alot more to analyzing a video than just saying, "it has to be a bird" and then trying to justify the response by talking about camera chip technology. From my experience, a film of a bird...well...looks like a bird. You see movement, flapping, etc. If it were a "still" photo, you have much less evidence to go on...but if you're filming, a bird has specific movements...even when its soaring.

After listening to how some were analyzing this, I downloaded it and went thru my usual process. I was anxious to see what other clues I found that others may not be mentioning yet.

What I Looked At

Listened to the experiencer - Yes. That's right. Listen to the experiencers story! It makes a difference. If the experiencer says they were filming a hovering object in a gusty wind, and someone rails on and on about that object being a "balloon", well...that person is not much of a researcher because he completely ignored the posters info.

-Update-
In this particular case, they are Sam Chortek and Jimmy Chappie. The above video is an interview with one of them, explaining the entire experience from filming to discovery. I'm observing some "de-bunkers" making wild accusations about these two people--including Brian Hanley---yet none of them have bothered to interview them. Why?

If the experiencer writes a description of the event, read it, or listen to it, and then ask questions if you can. It may help tremendously.

Slow Motion

Slow it down - Often these objects go by SO fast that they are hard to see at first. if you have the software to do so, slow it down and scrub the film frame by frame. (Click on Slow Motion to go directly to slo-mo section of video)

In the case of this Utah object, it starts from way back...

Then you can see the way it moves or flies. We don't see any flapping but there does seem to be an angular movement to its right.

Zoom in closer - Zooming in closer allows me to check out features of the surface...even if they are pixelated.

Zoomed Stills

Zooming in also allows shape change and flight characteristics to be seen. The above zoom shows how the object is literally vertical before banking left and buzzing the camera. (Click on "Zoomed Stills" link above to go directly to photos of object)

Brightness, contrast, gamma - can be adjusted to bring out more of the surface features of the object, or the overall shape of the object in general. I'm still learning how to use these, so I am no expert by far.

Emboss Section

Emboss - this can be extremely useful as it gives a reverse impression of the object so you can more clearly see its actual shape. (Click on "Emboss Section" to go directly to embossed version of object)

Object tipped to the left, almost completely vertical.

Object banks to the right

Clear view of object embossed.

In this case, the shape is more of a "Y" shape or that of a "flux capacitor" from Back to the Future than a bird.

If this is in fact a bird, I think it warrants as much attention as a possible UFO as its the first bird ever discovered that actually flies sideways. What kind of bird would that be? Surely not an earth falcon or hawk.

Whatever the answer, the debate will continue, hopefully from several angles and points of view. This is just the beginning.

Update-
In the meantime, I am still "searching" for someone who knows even more about analyzing these kinds of videos. What other software can be used? How do we measure "spectra" data? Is there a way to measure the type and degree and composition of the luminosity of one of these objects? What other captures out there are similar to this one? If I "were" trying to make sure it was not a cgi image, how else could I determine that?

In other words, there are a zillion questions and ways to analyze these videos.

It helps to be patient and continue to be in "data gathering" mode and connect the dots little by little. Also helps to avoid dramas like trying to dissect people's behaviour, motivations and psychology, accusing people of malcontent and "making money" and getting "publicity".

Really, most are just trying to share a mind blowing experience.

Listen to the interview above. His voice shakes a bit when he talks about deciding to share it almost three years later.

I remember when I found the Joshua Tree object (above) "after" the fact... I looked at that thing hundreds of times, and got so freaked out that I had to put it away and not look at it for months until I finally pulled it out again and posted the footage.

These events are weird...that's why experiencers eventually share them. They need a little help processing the weirdness too. Okay? So calling them haoxers doesn't help anyone, least of all the one making the accusation.

Will Continue to Happen
This is happening a lot these days and will continue to happen as time goes on. Analyze truthfully as possible and discuss, try not to remain attached, and keep your eyes open for more videos and sightings. The answers will continue to flow.

For the ones who are obsessed with hoaxes, cgi, negative human motivations, making money and publicity, and all the other accusations hurled at people who find themselves in this rabbit-hole...well...

...try it. Go out and experiment. Go out and film and see what you find. People have experimented with this phenomenon and have been blown away at what they've seen. It's not as uncommon as people think it is. Personal experience is everything....I encourage researchers to seek their own experiences.

What Its Like to Talk About UFOs -- Comic 3d Animated Short Video

noreply@blogger.com (jimisroom) — Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:09:00 +0000

Back in 2009ish I started making little music videos to showcase some of my dance music.

Oftentimes I would incorporate UFO themes into the imagery of the videos. It was just something that I was drawn to do.

Then the weirdness REALLY started when I had my own UAP sighting in 2013, one that lasted long enough for me to film it.

I was forever changed by this, and went on spending alot of time investigating this experience, eventually discovering several months later that another person had seen it and posted the experience at NUFORC.

None of my research however, would prepare me for how difficult this was to share with some people...including ones who claimed to have earnest interest in the subject.

As I dive deeper into some 3d animation with Reallusion's iClone7 and Toonmaker2, I feel like its an appropriate time to continue some of the UFOArt I as inspired to do before, but with a little more specificity.

In this short scene, Johnny has just had a UFO sighting and is sharing it was a skeptic and another marveling in wonder.

Was still figuring out "sound", so please be gentle.

Inspired by the experience below.

More to come...

The Dark Orb UFOs & Thoughts On "Restoring Civil Discourse" Discussing UFO Disclosure..or Anything Else For That Matter

noreply@blogger.com (jimisroom) — Sun, 16 Sep 2018 06:07:00 +0000

A "dark orb" UFO over Hollywood

My intent was to connect and listen to the stories of other experiencers who have witnessed and filmed sky anomalies.

I live in a “hot spot” so to speak, and since 2013 I’ve been semi-regularly capturing UFOs/UAPs/Sky Anomalies on video. And I'm not the only one. There are several out there who are keeping an eye on the skies for unusual phenomenon. I wanted to connect with some of them and compare experiences.

I thought my prayers had been answered after discovering a short documentary on YouTube produced by a guy who started an online discussion group based upon approaching the UAP phenomenon from a “scientific perspective”.

This appeared it would be a tremendous breath of fresh air…especially after having navigated the comments sections of YouTube channels and various UFO forums where people delight in…well…not even talking about the subject at all, much less approaching it from a scientific perspective.

I Was Just Sharing an Experience -- Everyone Has A Story, Right?

Over time, I’ve gotten very careful to explain these experiences with this "odd stuff" as just that…an experience that presents lots of questions that I and many others are still trying to figure out.

Although it is a "possibility", I in no way advocate or claim that any of my captures are of extraterrestrial craft....yet no doubt many online comment factories/troll farms will "default" to accusing me of this.

Embossed Version of Triangular UFO-Orb Formation - Joshua Tree Retreat Center

They could be a natural phenomenon, some kind of energy mass, an energy or light being of "SOME KOIND" (a shout out to David Hatcher Childress), a luminous object from some Earth origin where most humans don’t go, or perhaps even some of our own advanced technology. Certainly, they COULD be ET…but once again…I don’t know that.

Luminous UFO over Hollywood

White "Eyeball" Orb (l) and Luminous UFO (r) over Hollywood

Some of them literally look like daytime captures of "orbs".

All I know is that I've often captured something highly unusual that doesn't move in a conventional way, is often luminous, changes shape and texture, and has a way of showing up in what seems to be intelligent or connected "patterns". Most, to all of these captures have had some kind of story behind them…often showing a kind of synchronicity that just can’t be “planned”.

The synchronicity associated with so many of these video captures is very difficult to "get to" in comments of a forum when all people want to pay attention to is whether or not something is "cgi" or a mistaken balloon.

Still of First "Dark Orb" UFO Sighting - August 2017

So the idea of sharing with a group that was approaching this scientifically sounded like a fresh start.

I had some data to draw from.

And, having attended a service academy where the core curriculum was math, science and engineering, and having experience in satellite operations, I felt fully prepared to speak "scientifically", fully expecting those participating in this online group with the "scientific approach" in mind to do the same.

This includes starting with a hypothesis, deciding on a regimen of experimentation, setting that up, gathering data from any and all perspectives, and then forming a conclusion. The "catch" is that you may have to repeat this process several times to feel like you've actually gotten anywhere.

"When someone answers an informational question with a personal attack, they are trying to control you."

"If someone changes the subject and immediately blames you or a whole group of people for something, they are trying to control you. "

"They are trying to take your energy."

"Attacking someone doesn't inform you or feed you. In fact, remaining mired in un-needed conflict is a form of bondage."

"You don’t give yourself any time to create anything else."

Not what they seemed…

After being "accepted" to this group, I read several posts and waited several months before submitting my own post.

I wasn’t necessarily seeing what I expected yet. There were articles and a few videos of sightings here and there, but none of the ones that I saw were posted by the actual experiencer. It seemed to be more centered on posting videos from a third party, and then asking….”what do you think?”…not really generating a lot of responses.

There was, what you could call, a "red flag"...when one of the main moderators of the group went after a prominent UFO researcher, severely questioning his credibility and accusing him of "drinking the koolade". I had never heard this researcher say anything extreme...and when it came down to it, no links, evidence, anecdote, or argument was supplied to back up his claims. I was baffled...and looked extensively through the group forum to see what else had been said. Apparently I didn't look enough? Nothing.

Looking back, perhaps I should have waited longer…but I was very excited about a capture of an anomaly that seemed to be very much connected to two previous captures of dark, shape changing objects slowly moving in front of an overcast sky. I felt it was an appropriate time to share.

The Dark Orb UFOs

The oddity of these captures seemingly being "connected" takes some time to explain, and I felt assured I’d be given the opportunity to do so in a UFO/UAP group centered on the “scientific approach”. After all, that “approach” includes forming a hypothesis, gathering data and then analyzing it within some "agreed upon" framework…

When all was said and done, this rather strange capture was very “connected”. Something else was going on here…and I was happy to encounter a group who have all acknowledged by their “presence” in that group that they are serious about listening, asking questions, and even showing other captures to compare.

The "hypothesis" was this: SOME UFO videos...not all, are in fact videos of some kind of "orb" or energy mass that manifest in our 3-d world. Some "may" appear as balloons at first, but when zooming in one can see a noticeable energy field, movement, and "change of shape". They look and move like orbs, and can be bright and luminous or dark grey and black with a notable changing field.

I'll attempt to do a better job at explaining this time and start with my "first" capture of the "dark orb" ufos.

The First Time

The first time I captured one of these 'dark orb' objects in daylight was in August of 2018, underneath the clouds during an overcast day.

I was out back to stretch a bit after a stressful day, and from behind the right side of the building I looked towards the building across the street.

There was a dark object in the sky moving slowly towards the east. At first I thought someone was "punking" me by setting off a balloon to see if I would film it, but as I continued to watch, it moved very much unlike a balloon...I started to film anyway. It continues to move eastward, at times stalls, and then will look like its literally squeezing itself into accelerating forward.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture change.

In the last third of the opening shot, you can see how this object seems to pause for a few moments before suddenly changing shape and acclerating eastward. During that entire time, you can see it morph from a square / diamond shape with specific "designs" or "patterns" to more of a "football" shape when it starts to accelerate.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture change.

Look at the captures and the change of shape at different stages.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture change.

These are all the same object.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture change.

I went out front to capture as much as I could. It was still up there. I filmed another few minutes.

Look at the still captures and the change of shape at different stages. These are all the same object.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture and colour change.

Here is an example of shape, texture and color change during the last third of the experience. It would hover and move very slowly towards the east...but after several moments would slightly accelerate while changing shape from a diamond to more of a football. Notice the colour change as well.

The Andy Warhol inspired tiles above from different frames of the capture show this.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture and colour change.

And I say again, there were at least three other people on the street at the time and no one looked up at all, even the guy who stopped a moment to notice I was filming the sky. He just looked at me for a moment...

...and then went back to the business of his phone.

It Happened Again

Surprisingly, I captured this type of object again about five months later during the first week of January, 2018.

Second Encounter with a "Dark Orb" UFO

It looked quite similar to the last dark orb ufo capture... It was another overcast day, and this dark object could be seen slowly moving towards the east.

This object didn't change colour as much as the last one, but was still very dynamic in the way it changed shape and the way it shows what looks like a visual "torsion field" during the course of the capture.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture and shape change.

This one changes shape from a double diamond to a rectangle and back again.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture and shape change.

I had all kinds of questions now…especially having seen these happen a few months apart.

Closeup of "Dark Orb" UFO - Notice the texture and shape change.

I wondered if anyone else had captured anything similar.

That was the nature of the beginning of this journey in the first place...

I've always been grateful for people who post their experiences with these sky anomalies, because I think they provide a comparison and possible reference point for your "own" experiences.

The rate of these reports continues to increase, so it may only be a matter of time until you've just had your own experience, and you're looking for a frame of reference beyond just the story.

I had already found an online video of a capture in Italy of something that looked very, very similar to these things...so I went on a search for it.

I Did Find Other Captures That Looked Similar

And I was grateful these people had posted because it acted as a reference point for me, and others that these had been seen elsewhere.

This doesn't necessarily mean they were the same object. It doesn't mean someone didn't successfully cgi something close somewhere else. But they still act as a reference.

Statue of Liberty

Observe more small details of what they really look like in flight by slowing down the videos.

Ruetlingen, Germany

I wondered how many other people out there had captured dark orbs like this?

I wondered if they ever showed up in a group...or any kind of formation.

I had captured a group of orbs forming a perfect triangle in the past...but they were in front of a blue sky and luminous. Was it possible to see the same thing with these "dark orb" objects? A formation of sorts???

And Then There Were "Three"...

You can imagine the conflicting emotions and thoughts going in on my mind when this happened.

It was two months and five days after I had captured the second dark orb ufo on film.

I was walking eastward and heard a helicopter. That was the original reason I looked up…

As plain as day, there were a formation of three of these things.

A group of three "Dark Orb" UFOs

I thought they may have been balloons at first, didn't see any visible strings holding them together...but filmed anyway to see if there was anything else I could learn from the film.

Thankfully I did so…because on closer inspection it was clear to me that these weren’t balloons but a group of three of these dark orbs hovering around each other.

After closely examining them…zooming in, looking at embossed versions, slowing it down, noticing no strings whatsoever, and comparing it with the other captures, including a reference video from Robert Freeman, I concluded that these weren’t a clump of three balloons.

They appeared to me to be a set of three "dark orbs"...very much like the single dark orbs I had captured earlier.

A group of three "Dark Orb" UFOs
Notice the texture change.

I had seen a couple of captures from documentaries that were similar…a set of six and a set of two… They move and look similarly.

A group of three "Dark Orb" UFOs
Notice the texture change.

They also move differently than balloons.

Balloons bounce, buffet, and continually move with the currents of the air.

You’ll see continual changes in pitch and banking. You’ll see continual rocking back and forth and left to right.

There’s little mistaking a balloon once you’ve seen how they move….but the trick is to really “look” at it. That’s why I went through pains to zoom in close and slow down the video…so that people can see the distinct difference in movement.

A group of three "Dark Orb" UFOs
Notice the texture change.

Also, when you zoom into the objects, you can see ports and holes open and close as it goes by. There is literally a shape and texture change. Just like the photos in the first two experiences above, each object changes shape and texture. Closely looking at the photos of the "three", the same thing is happening.

A group of three "Dark Orb" UFOs
Notice the texture change.

Now let me make something clear...

I was posting this on a discussion group people "willingly" join because they are interested in the subject of UFOs\UAPs\Sky Anomalies. Please understand this.

I understood this. I was certain the members of the group understood this.

I was NOT forcing this on anybody.

I wasn’t, say...for instance...out in the middle of the 101 freeway, doing backflips covered in guacamole with firecrackers yelling at the top of my lungs that I had seen and filmed a UFO.

I wasn’t out on a public sidewalk, jumping in front of people with a mobile device to force them to look at one of my films.

I was in no way imposing on this group's “free will”.

So I couldn't for the life of me understand why, without asking a single iota of a question, a few people who I thought were coming from a "scientific approach" needed to immediately "act out" so angrily.

A Pathetic Attempt to Smear

One of my disappointments with the average online "forum" is that people avoid the original topic, and then literally "change the subject" to willingly create conflict.

I ran directly into the same thing, right off the bat with this..."scientific" group, but with a reckless viciousness I had yet to see in any online interchange.

A supposed research "heavyweight" from the group....one with supposedly over 30 years experience researching UFOs...went to my Facebook page, grabbed a screen shot from ANOTHER UFO capture, and then posted it to the group with a comment that went something like: