<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Jody Eisenman on Finance</title>
	
	<link>http://www.jodyeisenman.com</link>
	<description>Words of insight on the financial markets from the CEO of Perrin, Holden &amp; Davenport Capital.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JodyEisenmanOnFinance" /><feedburner:info uri="jodyeisenmanonfinance" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Great News: More People Out of Work</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/ID7a7YHDVoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/09/great-news-more-people-out-of-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The much anticipated unemployment number was released this morning. Unemployment rose to 9.6%.  However, private payrolls rose, which signaled to some that the recession may be easing. If it is, I don’t see it. The financial sector continues to lay off people. Investment banking has slowed dramatically. In addition, the underemployment rate (which includes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The much anticipated unemployment number was released this morning. Unemployment rose to 9.6%.  However, private payrolls rose, which signaled to some that the recession may be easing. If it is, I don’t see it. The financial sector continues to lay off people. Investment banking has slowed dramatically. In addition, the underemployment rate (which includes part timers who can’t find full time work and people who have given up searching) increased to 16.7% from 16.5%.</p>
<p>However, the stock futures have soared on the news, reason being that analysts were expecting a complete collapse. So, the bad news is really not that bad, which means its’ good. Did everyone understand that? Currently, the S and P is trading at around 1100 in the pre market. This may be a key level, as a strong move through it could signal a great third quarter. However, the trend this year has been choppy, so anything is possible going forward.</p>
<p>Happy Labor Day to all!</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=568&amp;ts=1283527518" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/09/great-news-more-people-out-of-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/09/great-news-more-people-out-of-work/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Banks: Bove versus Whitney</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/HP0oVRi0eYA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/09/the-banks-bove-versus-whitney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the worst August in 9 years, stocks exploded to the up side yesterday, staging a 255 point rally. The stock market continues to follow a familiar pattern. Just when things look truly awful, and it looks like we are falling off a cliff, the market rallies. On the other hand, several days of rallies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the worst August in 9 years, stocks exploded to the up side yesterday, staging a 255 point rally. The stock market continues to follow a familiar pattern. Just when things look truly awful, and it looks like we are falling off a cliff, the market rallies. On the other hand, several days of rallies lead people to become bullish again, and then the market starts its’  decline. These trading cycles have frustrated trend traders, as no real trend can take hold for any length of time. As is often the case, yesterdays’  rally was led by the financials, most of which have been declining since July. The question is what’s next for this group?<br />
There are two analysts who are frequent guests on CNBC who could not be more diametrically opposed to each other. On the one hand, we have Dick Bove from Rochdale Securities. Bove has been a major bull on the banks for years, including the 2008 debacle. Not surprisingly, he continues to be bullish, even stating that several US banks could actually quadruple in value over the next few years. He also believes that parts of the Dodd-Frank bill will be repealed.</p>
<p>On the other hand, we have Meredith Whitney. Whitney achieved her primary claim to fame in October of 2007, where she wrote a very negative report on Citigroup while she was employed at Oppenheimer. She then went on to be a very prominent bear on the financials as they collapsed. Whitney went on to found her own firm last year. Currently, she is very bearish on the financials and housing as well. She believes that European Banks have enormous exposure due to the overvaluing of sovereign (read: country) debt, while US banks continue to suffer from housing loans. She believes that a great deal of housing losses have not been factored into the banks’ earnings. As such, she stated “Avoid financials at all costs”.</p>
<p>I stand more in the middle. I can’t argue with Whitney’s loan analysis. On the other hand, bank profits are soaring. For the second quarter, the roughly 7000 banks under FDIC had profits of $21.6BB, as compared to a $4.6BB loss for the sector a year ago. In addition, as long as the Federal Reserve continues its’ Zero Interest Rate Policy (also known as “ZIRP”), banks can borrow money at virtually nothing. Therefore, unless they continue to make crappy loans, they should continue to have a very high spread between their cost of funds and their return on loans. However, I continue to believe that the leverage factor (which I have discussed numerous times) is still a potentially dangerous scenario. I believe that this leverage should be gradually reduced over time. Any time you allow banks to leverage their equity at up 35-40 times you give them rope to hang themselves. Unfortunately, as we have seen, their problems can become everyone’s problem.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=566&amp;ts=1283527518" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/09/the-banks-bove-versus-whitney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/09/the-banks-bove-versus-whitney/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Bernanke’s Speech a Game Changer?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/WQQfIa2SguA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/was-bernanke%e2%80%99s-speech-a-game-changer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke spoke Friday about the state of the economy and the role of the Federal Reserve. His basic credo was that even though the economy still is lagging, not to worry! The Fed has the tools to carry us through. Such tools might include increased monetary easing. While the bond market dropped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke spoke Friday about the state of the economy and the role of the Federal Reserve. His basic credo was that even though the economy still is lagging, not to worry! The Fed has the tools to carry us through. Such tools might include increased monetary easing. While the bond market dropped somewhat on this news, the stock market finally staged a rally. The Dow surged almost 165 points, having its’ best day in a month. Was this the impetus for the long awaited rally? </p>
<p>Maybe, but I doubt it. I’m still of the opinion that the market is going to churn around, much like it has for most of the year. Despite the rally, the Dow is still down about two and a half per cent for the year. In addition, I still don’t see many positive signs of economic growth. For example, Intel (The worlds’ biggest chip maker) warned Friday that demand was slackening, and that third quarter revenues were going to be below expectations.  The Feds’ next move will hinge on this weeks’ key economic data, especially Fridays’ unemployment number. Even President Obama has conceded that the economy was not growing as fast as was needed, and that he had no “magic bullet” to change things. Sobering words indeed.<br />
Meanwhile, the yield on the S and P is currently 2.6%. That doesn’t sound like much, but that’s actually greater than the yield on ten year treasuries. I would have thought that this would make stocks appear cheap vis a vis bonds. However, as long the economy continues to slump, investor sentiments continue to favor the safety of US treasuries. Personally, I don’t see the great benefit of lending my money to the United States for ten years at 2.5%. It will be interesting to see what happens going forward.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=563&amp;ts=1283527518" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/was-bernanke%e2%80%99s-speech-a-game-changer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/was-bernanke%e2%80%99s-speech-a-game-changer/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Housing Market and the Economy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/m3nkzvuimno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-housing-market-and-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been much talk lately of   a “double dip” recession. What this means is that although the economy has appeared to come out of a decline, the reality is that we are slipping back into the abyss. An unemployment rate which has remained quite high (currently 9.5%) adds to this theory. However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been much talk lately of   a “double dip” recession. What this means is that although the economy has appeared to come out of a decline, the reality is that we are slipping back into the abyss. An unemployment rate which has remained quite high (currently 9.5%) adds to this theory. However, the real issue is the housing market. The housing markets’ initial decline led to massive losses when investment banks leveraged themselves and many of their clients into exotic products that few really understood. This has been discussed here several times. However, the bulls on the economy have felt that housing prices would rebound, leading to an overall rebound. Unfortunately, this is not the case. </p>
<p>Numbers released this week indicate that home sales are declining at a rapid rate. July home re-sales were expected to show a decline of 13.4%. Instead, the actual number was a staggering decrease of 27.2%. Over the past year, housing sales have plunged over 25%. This has occurred despite the fact that mortgage rates are at their lowest level in decades. Why the steep decline? After all, don’t home owners recognize a bargain when they see one?<br />
There are two issues. The first is, after an unprecedented period of spending, consumers are now turning cautious. Most people I know are cutting back on their lifestyles. After all, with a stock market crash in 2008 and an uncertain job market, do people really need a 50 inch plasma TV, or expensive season tickets to your local sports team? The second reason is the incredible glut of inventory. With foreclosures are extremely high levels, banks are sitting are huge inventories of houses. In addition, many banks are not foreclosing on homes under water (meaning that the mortgage due is worth more than the home itself) because  </p>
<p>They have already had a huge inventory of homes they can’t sell.<br />
They feel they would do better if they allowed the borrower more time by restructuring their loans. Of course, this has not worked out the way the banks planned: http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-mortgage-refinance-relief-mess/</p>
<p>Overall, the stock market has performed poorly. Since August 9, the Dow has declined from 10,700 to about 10,000 now. I would expect the Dow to have some sort of a bounce up here, (as has been the pattern all year), but continued poor economic numbers could really hurt growth going forward.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=561&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-housing-market-and-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-housing-market-and-the-economy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mortgage Refinance Relief Mess</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/i_kBuE30FmU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-mortgage-refinance-relief-mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As has been well documented, the residential real estate market has been a mess for years. Thanks to predatory lending, NINJA loans (no income, no job, no verification), ridiculous standards, you name it, many homeowners now own homes that are worth less then the mortgages. According to zillow.com, this number is currently 21.5%. There were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been well documented, the residential real estate market has been a mess for years. Thanks to predatory lending, NINJA loans (no income, no job, no verification), ridiculous standards, you name it, many homeowners now own homes that are worth less then the mortgages. According to zillow.com, this number is currently 21.5%. There were clearly many homeowners who purchased homes they could not possibly afford. I remember reading a story in my local newspaper awhile back about a woman with a take home income of $2500/month, who purchased a home with a monthly mortgage payment of over $6000! She went into foreclosure soon after. Her only comment was, “I just wanted to own a house”. Whether many of these people were foolish or mislead, the fact remains that there are lots of folks that cannot keep up payments. As a possible solution to this, The Obama administration instituted a mortgage relief program, intending to help three million homeowners. By and large, it has been a failure. Part of the problem was paperwork; the system was unable to keep up with demand. However, another problem soon became obvious. Although only about 600,000 homeowners actually have qualified since March 2009, almost half have fallen out of compliance. This, despite the fact that many qualified for rates as low as two percent for a 5 year period. The reason for this is simple: Many of these people could never afford these homes under any interest rate. Plus, many more have faced loss of or reduced income, which led to an inability to pay. The point is, why have a program to provide mortgage relief when all it is doing is postponing the inevitable. On Wall Street, we have an expression for this. Its’ called “Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic”.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=559&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-mortgage-refinance-relief-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-mortgage-refinance-relief-mess/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hindenburg Omen</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/LfnZtV8eqjc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-hindenburg-omen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the stock declining the past few days on relatively light volume, there was been a lot of talk lately about a technical indicator known as the Hindenburg Omen. Named after the famous Hindenburg zeppelin disaster in 1937, it is a technical indicator that is said to predict a stock market crash. Basically, this “omen” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the stock declining the past few days on relatively light volume, there was been a lot of talk lately about a technical indicator known as the Hindenburg Omen. Named after the famous Hindenburg zeppelin disaster in 1937, it is a technical indicator that is said to predict a stock market crash. Basically, this “omen” supposedly happens after a series of indicators related to stocks hitting new highs, others hitting new lows, and a rising 10 week moving average among others. It is said that this is a great indicator of an imminent market collapse. According to the WallStreet Journal, it has indicated every major market decline since 1987. The only problem is, its’only been right about 25% of the time. Why people pay so much attention to this is beyond me, but it’s probably due to a lack of other market news.  </p>
<p>  As I have stated for some time, I do not see the market making a major move in either direction for awhile. For the year, the Dow and the S and P are down slightly for the year. My own technical analysis shows that we are somewhat oversold here, so I think the next move is probably higher. However, as Summer volume remains light and should continue this way until Labor Day, anything can happen. I, for one, wouldn’t bet my bottom dollar on a crash.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=557&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-hindenburg-omen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-hindenburg-omen/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fed and the Economy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/kEWLEDZ95kI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-fed-and-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Fed issued their latest view of the economy. As expected, their outlook was not encouraging.  Among other points, the Fed announced that they would reinvest principal payments from the mortgages they hold on their book into long term treasuries. Although, the Fed really only has the ability to manipulate short term rates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Fed issued their latest view of the economy. As expected, their outlook was not encouraging.  Among other points, the Fed announced that they would reinvest principal payments from the mortgages they hold on their book into long term treasuries. Although, the Fed really only has the ability to manipulate short term rates via Fed Funds, these anticipated purchases are an attempt to adjust long term rates downward as well. According to a statement from the FOMC (Fed Open Market Committee), “The pace of economic recovery is likely to be more modest in the near term than had been anticipated”. As such, it is unlikely that short term rates will increase any time soon.</p>
<p>This, obviously, is not good news. The DJIA, which had been down almost 150 points prior to the announcement, actually rallied to almost even before closing down 54 points. However, the futures this morning are down dramatically. European markets are down about 1.5-2%, which is the equivalent of roughly 200 Dow points.</p>
<p>Critics of the current administration (who seem to be growing in number every day) site the fact although the government has spent incredible sums in stimulus and bail outs, it has not had a major effect on Main Street America. Many industries are in deep trouble. The housing market continues to struggle under a combination of oversupply and a huge inventory of homes in foreclosure. According to Zillow.com, about 22% of all homeowners are under water, meaning that their homes are worth less than their mortgage. To add fuel to this fire, a Deutsche Bank report last week, this number could hit an incredible 48% before this recession ends. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#038;sid=adBYDzUMt68k</p>
<p>I wouldn’t even hazard a guess as to what mass defaults would do to the housing and financial markets. Stay tuned.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=555&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-fed-and-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/the-fed-and-the-economy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Summer Reading and Job Growth</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/YVdIHJ65p-w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/summer-reading-and-job-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished Lowensteins’ new book, “The End of Wall Street”, one of several books written about the sub-prime crash and the subsequent financial chaos. I would highly recommend this, as well as his previous book about the demise of LTCM (Long Term Capital Management) titled “When Genius Failed”. Anyone interested in the stories of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished Lowensteins’ new book, “The End of Wall Street”, one of several books written about the sub-prime crash and the subsequent financial chaos. I would highly recommend this, as well as his previous book about the demise of LTCM (Long Term Capital Management) titled “When Genius Failed”. Anyone interested in the stories of the demise of Bear Stearns might enjoy “House of Cards” and “Street Fighters”.I read about 2-3 books per week, so if want my opinion, please feel free to call or email. </p>
<p>The markets reacted negatively to Fridays’ job report. US private employers (that is, excluding the government) added fewer workers in July, and June’s numbers were revised downwards as well. The stock market tanked on the news, falling over 100 points, but rallied late in the day to close down just twenty odd points. Still, it would seem to many economists (as well as yours truly) that the economy is not recovering anywhere nearly as quickly as was hoped for. In todays’ Bergen Record, there was a very revealing article about the <a href="http://www.bonusrating.com/">casino</a> industry in New Jersey. When casino gaming was first legalized in New Jersey, gamblers flocked to the tables in record numbers. It was common for people to stand 2 and 3 deep at the blackjack tables! People did not want to use the rest rooms for fear of losing their seat. As gambling revenues skyrocketed, the tax revenue for New Jersey soared. Today, gaming makes up by far the largest portion of taxable revenue to the state. Unfortunately, the politicians never planned on a recession hurting their business. As such, they never invested much money in Atlantic City. Therefore, unlike Las Vegas, where people can walk the Strip at all hours of the night safely, Atlantic City is very different. A walk along the boardwalk or even a couple of blocks from the casinos will lead you into areas of slums, pawn shops and crime. No the recession has hit, combined with legalized gambling in almost every state, the whole industry is hurting and all of New Jersey is feeling the pain. </p>
<p>  Meanwhile, consumer credit continues to shrink, while people are reluctant to spend, let alone take on additional debt. In the meantime, the dollar dropped against the Euro, and fell to a 15 year low against the Yen. However, yields continue to drop, with the 2 year treasury going to another record low. One wonders how long foreign investors will continue to invest in such low yielding treasuries in the face of a weakening dollar.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=553&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/summer-reading-and-job-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/summer-reading-and-job-growth/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sign of the Times: Two Year Treasury Yield at All Time Low</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/MVkqHTicPaw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/sign-of-the-times-two-year-treasury-yield-at-all-time-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another sign that the recession lives on, the yield on two year treasury notes fell to .546 per cent. This yield has now dropped for nine straight weeks. According to BGCantor Market Data, this is an all time low. Generally, low treasury yields are indicative of a flight to quality by investors who want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In another sign that the recession lives on, the yield on two year treasury notes fell to .546 per cent. This yield has now dropped for nine straight weeks. According to BGCantor Market Data, this is an all time low. Generally, low treasury yields are indicative of a flight to quality by investors who want safety, and/or to a low level of confidence in the economy. The Dross Domestic Product (GDP) grew at 2.4% annualized rate last quarter. This rate was 3.7% in the first quarter and 5% in the last quarter of 2009.This is not good news. With this lack of growth, the Fed will almost certainly keep rates low for the foreseeable future.<br />
“We need 2.5 percent growth just to keep the unemployment rate where it is,” said Christina Romer, chairwoman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers. “If you want to get it down quickly, you need substantially stronger growth than that. That’s what I’ve been saying for the last several quarters, and that’s why I’ve been hoping that we’ll please pass the jobs measures just sitting on the floor of Congress.” </p>
<p>  Meanwhile, the equity markets had a good July. The S and P 500 ended up at 1101,or a rise of 7.23% for the month. Many market technicians believed that 1100 on the S and P was a key resistance level. Thus, they believed that a break on the upside would send the stock market much higher. Although we did break through, there wasn’t a great follow through. It would seem to me that although the market certainly looks healthier than it did a month ago, we need a strong rally to sustain the breakout. Next week’s jobs report might be crucial to the future direction of the market.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=551&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/sign-of-the-times-two-year-treasury-yield-at-all-time-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/08/sign-of-the-times-two-year-treasury-yield-at-all-time-low/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economic Outlook Remains Unusually Uncertain</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JodyEisenmanOnFinance/~3/a6D5AEGUUFA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/07/the-economic-outlook-remains-unusually-uncertain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jody Eisenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jodyeisenman.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ So said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in testimony to the Senate Banking Committee. What does this mean? Well, the Chairman is saying that the economy is really not improving, and he doesn’t have the faintest idea what to do about it. As I have stated previously, http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/06/the-jobs-inflation-conundrum/,
The administration is in a tough spot. Interest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in testimony to the Senate Banking Committee. What does this mean? Well, the Chairman is saying that the economy is really not improving, and he doesn’t have the faintest idea what to do about it. As I have stated previously, http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/06/the-jobs-inflation-conundrum/,</p>
<p>The administration is in a tough spot. Interest rates as measured by Fed Funds are almost zero, yet the recovery is stagnating. Unemployment hovers around 10%. In addition, the debt situation is getting worse and worse.  </p>
<p>As a president, it&#8217;s one thing to know you have a big fiscal problem. It&#8217;s quite another when a panel you appointed tells you the policies you have in mind will only make things worse. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what happened Sunday, when leaders of President Obama&#8217;s deficit commission offered up the darkest of outlooks for our financial future — calling current trends in U.S. budgets a &#8220;cancer&#8221; that will &#8220;destroy the country from within&#8221; unless halted soon.  Not exactly encouraging news.<br />
Meanwhile, after a 200 point reversal in stocks yesterday after a weak opening, the market dropped on Bernanke’ remarks. After sitting slightly up for most of the morning, the markets dropped immediately during Bernanke’ testimony to eventually close down over 100 points. As I continue to expect, the equity markets continue to churn in a relatively narrow range. Year to date, the Dow has traded as low as 9686, and as high as 11, 204. However, for most of the year, the range has been less then 1000 points, or around 10%. Just to put this in perspective, in 2008, the Dow traded in a range of over 4000 points. In 2009, the range was over 3500 points.</p>
<img src="http://www.jodyeisenman.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=549&amp;ts=1283527519" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/07/the-economic-outlook-remains-unusually-uncertain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jodyeisenman.com/2010/07/the-economic-outlook-remains-unusually-uncertain/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
