<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>John Thomson: Thinking out loud » Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://johnthomson.org</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the social impacts of information and communication technology policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:41:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud" /><feedburner:info uri="johnthomsonthinkingoutloud" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Social networking too proprietary</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~3/E5BrVPUQ3mQ/social-networking-too-proprietary</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media / Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t begin to say how much I agree with this.  Standards and open platforms for online social networking would be huge. The network effect would likely slow a migration down, but I&#8217;m glad someone is working on it. Could open source tools make Facebook the next AOL? &#8211; Computerworld. (0)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t begin to say how much I agree with this.  Standards and open platforms for online social networking would be <em>huge</em>. The network effect would likely slow a migration down, but I&#8217;m glad someone is working on it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179785/Could_open_source_tools_make_Facebook_the_next_AOL_">Could open source tools make Facebook the next AOL? &#8211; Computerworld</a>.</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Social networking too proprietary">(0)</a><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~4/E5BrVPUQ3mQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet TV for couch potatos</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~3/kNlcAGZluGQ/internet-tv-for-couch-potatos</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/internet-tv-for-couch-potatos#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite blogs that doesn&#8217;t often make it to posts here is OSNews. Their editor, Eugenia, takes on an issue that I&#8217;ve been giving a lot of thought to lately&#8211;Internet TV (The Next Big Tech Battleground: the TV). She starts out by stating, &#8220;I&#8217;m a couch potato.&#8221; Aren&#8217;t we all? Eugenia&#8217;s experience with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite blogs that doesn&#8217;t often make it to posts here is OSNews. Their editor, Eugenia, takes on an issue that I&#8217;ve been giving a lot of thought to lately&#8211;Internet TV (<a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/23578/The_Next_Big_Tech_Battleground_the_TV">The Next Big Tech Battleground: the TV</a>).</p>
<p>She starts out by stating, &#8220;I&#8217;m a couch potato.&#8221; Aren&#8217;t we all?</p>
<p>Eugenia&#8217;s experience with her PS3 with Netflix and Hulu Plus leads her to believe that the best way forward is to bake this kind of functionality into televisions.</p>
<blockquote><p>I get all these movies, shows, documentaries that make me want to ditch  my Comcast box (which costs me a whopping $90 per month for the HD  channels and DVR &#8212; and that&#8217;s without the movie channels or HBO). The  only thing that&#8217;s missing from the new experience is Live TV (e.g.  sports). But if a &#8220;smart&#8221; platform reaches our TVs, that lets you run  applications, and have access to Netflix/Hulu/etc. content via their  native applications for that platform, then Live TV will be inevitable.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether I agree or disagree with that specific point, but I think her target of &#8220;the couch potato&#8221; is very illustrative.</p>
<p>Most online media platforms (Google, Boxee, and to a lesser degree Hulu and Netflix) are structured more towards <em>searching</em> for online videos as opposed to just <em>delivering</em> them. To a couch potato, that sounds like work.</p>
<p>Digital Video Recorders are similar technology that has taken off smashingly well. It is easy to use a DVR.  They fit the way television programming is structured &#8212; it&#8217;s simple to record an episode or series, and every series is packaged together in easily navigable folders.  Internet TV doesn&#8217;t even come close.</p>
<p>Eugenia ends on a very insightful note:</p>
<blockquote><p>The only real obstacle in the kind of future I present in this article  are Comcast, AT&amp;T, and Verizon. These companies make big business  over their cable TV solutions, and it&#8217;s unfortunate that they&#8217;re also  internet providers. Do you really think that Comcast will let you stream  this highly competitive content over their network? I didn&#8217;t think so.  It&#8217;d be like committing business suicide. &#8230;</p>
<p>So it all comes down to net neutrality. If this much-discussed law  passes, at last, eventually our TVs will get revolutionized. Maybe it  will take a few more years for all the TV manufacturers to settle down  to the same platform, but it will happen.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~4/kNlcAGZluGQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/internet-tv-for-couch-potatos/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/internet-tv-for-couch-potatos</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Could meaningful use be applied to FERPA?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~3/-30ATAS7_OU/could-meaningful-use-be-applied-to-ferpa</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/could-meaningful-use-be-applied-to-ferpa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Communication Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the ongoing struggles of the educational technologist is dealing with FERPA law and instructor/student expectations.  Frequently an instructor will want to use a tool (hosted on campus or elsewhere) and want students to have access to the tool via automatic rostering.  Registrars can sometimes be hesitant to share this data. The health sector [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the ongoing struggles of the educational technologist is dealing with FERPA law and instructor/student expectations.  Frequently an instructor will want to use a tool (hosted on campus or elsewhere) and want students to have access to the tool via automatic rostering.  Registrars can sometimes be hesitant to share this data.</p>
<p>The health sector is actually working on this problem. In an interesting post about the concept of &#8220;meaningful use&#8221; the author shows how restrictions on data might be loosened a bit to the benefit of everyone involved(<a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/07/a-defining-moment-for-meaningf.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+oreilly%2Fradar%2Fatom+%28O%27Reilly+Radar%29">Analysis:  A defining moment for &#8220;meaningful use&#8221; &#8211; O&#8217;Reilly Radar)</a>. One example:</p>
<blockquote><p>Another important relaxation is in the area of e-prescribing. This is the ability to electronically send an accurate and understandable prescription directly to a pharmacy.</p></blockquote>
<p>By focusing on exactly how information might be used by stakeholders, rather than enforcing blanket restrictions, there may be some real gains in the quality of patient care. I think a similar concept for FERPA might have similar benefit.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~4/-30ATAS7_OU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/could-meaningful-use-be-applied-to-ferpa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/could-meaningful-use-be-applied-to-ferpa</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Online-driven evolution of social mores</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~3/U0qUC7ixJ_w/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media / Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Facebook, Google, and Our Evolving Social Mores Online &#8211; John Battelle&#8217;s Searchblog. This is along the same lines of my previous post about the Tweeting CNN editor, but zooms out for a much broader view of the impact of online social networks on our moral frameworks. I have to dig deeper on this one, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/07/on_facebook_google_and_our_evolving_social_mores_online.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JohnBattellesSearchblog+%28John+Battelle%27s+Searchblog%29">On Facebook, Google, and Our Evolving Social Mores Online &#8211; John Battelle&#8217;s Searchblog</a>.</p>
<p>This is along the same lines of my previous post about the Tweeting CNN editor, but zooms out for a much broader view of the impact of online social networks on our moral frameworks. I have to dig deeper on this one, so I can&#8217;t comment here, but hopefully someone finds it interesting.</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Online-driven evolution of social mores">(0)</a><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~4/U0qUC7ixJ_w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How carefully do we have to speak online?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~3/5nPBnfM2RPk/how-carefully-do-we-have-to-speak-online</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/how-carefully-do-we-have-to-speak-online#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media / Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Friedman recently briefly examined the firing of CNN editor Octavia Nasr. He touches on something that I think points out a coming shift in our on and offline social persona &#8212; how closely do we have to watch what we say online? Certainly there are limits, but it seems as though skittishness of employers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Friedman recently briefly examined the firing of CNN editor Octavia Nasr. He touches on something that I think points out a coming shift in our on and offline social persona &#8212; how closely do we have to watch what we say online? Certainly there are limits, but it seems as though skittishness of employers might hinder our ability to express our personal thoughts. Personally, I favor more speech and dialogue.  As Friedman states:</p>
<blockquote><p>What signal are we sending young people? Trim your sails, be politically correct, don’t say anything that will get you flamed by one constituency or another. And if you ever want a job in government, national journalism or as president of Harvard, play it safe and don’t take any intellectual chances that might offend someone. In the age of Google, when everything you say is forever searchable, the future belongs to those who leave no footprints.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/opinion/18friedman.html?_r=1">Op-Ed Columnist &#8211; Can We Talk? &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JohnThomsonThinkingOutLoud/~4/5nPBnfM2RPk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/how-carefully-do-we-have-to-speak-online/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/how-carefully-do-we-have-to-speak-online</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
