<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Traverse Internet Law: Internet Lawyers</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/</link>
<description />
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:38:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>

<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JohnWDozierJr" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="johnwdozierjr" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>Internet Law: MySpace Murder in Virginia</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2012/10/dozier-internet-law-myspace-murder-in-virginia.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2012/10/dozier-internet-law-myspace-murder-in-virginia.html</guid>
<description>A suspect in the mass murder of four parents and teens in Farmville, Virginia has been arrested at the airport trying to flee to California. In "Google Bomb" I call for changes to Section 230 immunity so that web sites have the ability to self police. Right now, as the law stands, their hands are tied. We need change. Now.</description>

<category>MySpace Mass Murder Case</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:38:38 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Traverse Internet Law: Medical Justice and Eric Goldman's Attack Site </title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2011/04/dozier-internet-law-medical-justice-and-eric-goldmans-attack-site-.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2011/04/dozier-internet-law-medical-justice-and-eric-goldmans-attack-site-.html</guid>
<description>Eric Goldman is a professor at Santa Clara University and as a former general counsel to Epinions.com has a long standing view of free speech that is, to say the least, one sided. He seems to always support a very liberal interpretation of the scope of free speech in his blog posts, comments, lectures, and presumably in his classes. Now he has joined with UC Berkeley, that bastion of conservative and pro-business thought (tongue firmly implanted in cheek), to launch an attack website against an organization named "Medical Justice" that seeks to assist doctors being attacked by defamatory comments online....</description>

<category>Reputation Management</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:11:18 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Traverse Internet Law Data Loss Analysis</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2011/04/dozier-internet-law-data-loss-analysis.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2011/04/dozier-internet-law-data-loss-analysis.html</guid>
<description>Data loss has been a hot topic lately. When Epsilon lost the email addresses of millions to hackers, everyone was up in arms and awaiting an onslaught of lawsuits. But Epsilon did not provide services to the consumers victimized by this loss and the only basis for a lawsuit may be a claim asserted by consumers against those very prominent companies who entrusted their data to Epsilon. At Traverse Internet Law we noted a decision handed down last week in Federal Court in California. The case is linked here: Claridge v. Rockyou, Inc. Note the real problem with proving actual...</description>

<category>Data Loss</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:23:32 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Internet Lawyer Summit in Vegas</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2011/04/internet-lawyer-summit-in-vegas.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2011/04/internet-lawyer-summit-in-vegas.html</guid>
<description>Internet Lawyer Summit Traverse Internet Law is organizing the first Cyberlawyer Summit to be held May 11 and 12 at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas. Eighteen of the leading Internet lawyers from across the country have been invited to this small, exclusive meeting focused on client development, synergistic opportunities and business operations. Many of the leading Internet law firms in the country are confirmed participants. If your law firm is dedicated predominantly to cyberlaw, preferably with a litigation or dispute resolution slant, and you are interested in participating, then drop an email at cybertriallawyer.com (Traverse Internet Law) with information about...</description>

<category>Internet Law</category>
<category>Internet Lawyer</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:49:14 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>National Cyberlaw Bar Association Forming</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/06/national-cyberlaw-bar-association-forming.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/06/national-cyberlaw-bar-association-forming.html</guid>
<description>Finally, a professional group for true Internet lawyers. An organizational meeting of the Cyberlaw Bar Association is being held July 31 through Augst 1 at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas. Here is the website for the bar association and conference: www.cyberlawbarassociation.com. If you are an Internet lawyer, you need to be there.</description>

<category>Cyberlaw Bar Association</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:20:01 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Traverse Internet Law at AdTech San Fran</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/04/dozier-internet-law-at-adtech-san-fran.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/04/dozier-internet-law-at-adtech-san-fran.html</guid>
<description>The Traverse Internet Law Federal Court Report reaches thousands of subscribers each month. We pick the best Internet lawsuits filed each month and explain what it means to your online business. And best of all....it's free. Just go to the Traverse Internet Law homepage and follow the directions for signing up. It's getting rave reviews. After all, where else can you find out who is being sued and for what?</description>

<category>Internet Law</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:03:20 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Traverse Internet Law on WebMaster Radio Tomorrow</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/03/john-w-dozier-jr-on-webmaster-radio-tomorrow.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/03/john-w-dozier-jr-on-webmaster-radio-tomorrow.html</guid>
<description>Join Traverse Internet Law at 5:20 PM Eastern on WebMaster Radio . will be discussing, and taking calls about, the Google Bomb book and commercial email. Interested in compliance issues and the latest and greatest email issues? This chat may be for you.</description>

<category>Internet Lawyer</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:29:05 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Both Sides of Section 230 Immunity</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/03/both-sides-of-section-230-immunity.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/03/both-sides-of-section-230-immunity.html</guid>
<description>Traverse Internet Law is a private law firm, not a public interest group. So we get to argue both sides of issues since we represent clients-not causes. In Federal Court in New York we are arguing that our client deserves Section 230 immunity from liability for third party content. And at the same time, in Federal Court in Florida we are arguing that the Defendant is not entitled to Section 230 immunity for liability arising from third party content. It is critically important to have a balanced perspective on legal matters, and the process of framing legal arguments starts with...</description>

<category>Section 230</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:37:00 -0400</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Traverse Internet Law at Search Engine Strategies Conference</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/03/dozier-internet-law-at-search-engine-strategies-conference.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/03/dozier-internet-law-at-search-engine-strategies-conference.html</guid>
<description>If you missed the ten biggest legal risks for social media sites, contact us for a rundown of the issues discussed. We understand the PowerPoint presentation from the Miami Social Media Conference in January is on the conference site. We had a lively debate at LeadsCon in Vegas last month in a General Session on FTC and legal compliance.</description>


<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:36:44 -0500</pubDate>

</item>
<item>
<title>Google Runs Into Trouble Oversees</title>
<link>http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/02/google-runs-into-trouble-oversees.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/2010/02/google-runs-into-trouble-oversees.html</guid>
<description>It's been interesting watching the politics of the online world lately at Traverse Internet Law. Google has been struggling with the Chinese government's information policies and threatening to pull out of China altogether. Google's claim, in summary, is that China does not adequately embrace the concepts of free speech. Yes, Google argues, China must change its attitude and approach about suppressing dissent and repressing criticism. Is Google's problem really one of free speech? Or is the problem that Google, and other US bred online businesses, really don't like to follow the laws of other countries? Do you remember the French...</description>

<category>Copyright Infringement</category>

<dc:creator>Traverse Internet Law</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:13:01 -0500</pubDate>

</item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 -->
