<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Journeyman</title>
	
	<link>http://briggs.id.au/jour</link>
	<description>Observation, enquiry, apology and critique.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JourCommentsFeed" /><feedburner:info uri="jourcommentsfeed" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Ad Hominem and the Postmodern Politic by What a Nice Debate Has Taught Me « Journeyman</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/EUFzsgXGR9c/</link>
		<dc:creator>What a Nice Debate Has Taught Me « Journeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3339#comment-33160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] If the thoughtfulness behind McKim&#8217;s (and other&#8217;s) social agenda is only &#8220;well, that&#8217;s what my position is, that&#8217;s what I think, that&#8217;s how I feel&#8221; our state has a whole different set of problems &#8211; something that I have glimpsed before. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If the thoughtfulness behind McKim&#8217;s (and other&#8217;s) social agenda is only &#8220;well, that&#8217;s what my position is, that&#8217;s what I think, that&#8217;s how I feel&#8221; our state has a whole different set of problems &#8211; something that I have glimpsed before. [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/EUFzsgXGR9c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/04/ad-hominem-and-the-postmodern-politic/#comment-33160</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A significant reply to Dr. Owuor by Bahati</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/QduEcTrtxNc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Bahati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=2713#comment-33082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, one thing i know a prophet of GOD is 100% perfect.
His teachings are 
1. Pre-tribulation rapture
2. Rapture b4 pale horse]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, one thing i know a prophet of GOD is 100% perfect.<br />
His teachings are<br />
1. Pre-tribulation rapture<br />
2. Rapture b4 pale horse</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/QduEcTrtxNc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2011/03/a-significant-reply-to-dr-owuor/#comment-33082</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tasmania, Tsunamis and the Prophecy of Dr. Owuor by Q&amp;A: You condemned Dr Owuor’s Prophecy… « Journeyman</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/JFR719kg1EA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Q&amp;A: You condemned Dr Owuor’s Prophecy… « Journeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 05:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=2496#comment-32520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Troy.  I assume you are referring to my post from quite some time ago about Dr. Owuor&#8217;s prophecy concerning Tasmania.  As far as I am aware there has been no earthquake in Bass Strait that has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Troy.  I assume you are referring to my post from quite some time ago about Dr. Owuor&#8217;s prophecy concerning Tasmania.  As far as I am aware there has been no earthquake in Bass Strait that has [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/JFR719kg1EA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2011/01/tasmania-tsunami-owuor/#comment-32520</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem of Political Pacifism by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/QmnhHE5kcJI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3382#comment-32493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A thoughtful post. I would also like to see a commitment, on the part of the `church&#039; to dialogue around social and political issues. As the church loses it&#039;s privileged status in the West, finding new [old] ways of engaging the culture becomes necessary from a position of `powerlessness.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thoughtful post. I would also like to see a commitment, on the part of the `church&#8217; to dialogue around social and political issues. As the church loses it&#8217;s privileged status in the West, finding new [old] ways of engaging the culture becomes necessary from a position of `powerlessness.&#8217;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/QmnhHE5kcJI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/05/the-problem-of-political-pacifism/#comment-32493</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circumactio Absurdus by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/GDqTrEV8lJ0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3392#comment-32492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think McKim at al are you really pitching their message to the elites [who share the same `progressive&#039; views and fixation with gay marriage] instead of the wider electorate. Refer to Spiked online for some insightful commentary on this issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think McKim at al are you really pitching their message to the elites [who share the same `progressive' views and fixation with gay marriage] instead of the wider electorate. Refer to Spiked online for some insightful commentary on this issue.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/GDqTrEV8lJ0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/05/circumactio-absurdus/#comment-32492</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circumactio Absurdus by John Tongue</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/XbH38mq_Vno/</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3392#comment-32467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr McKim and Mr Croome seem not to understand proportional voting.  The statistic that actually MATTERS is that more than 50% of voters gave their first, second or third preference to a candidate who does NOT support the re-definition of marriage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr McKim and Mr Croome seem not to understand proportional voting.  The statistic that actually MATTERS is that more than 50% of voters gave their first, second or third preference to a candidate who does NOT support the re-definition of marriage.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/XbH38mq_Vno" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/05/circumactio-absurdus/#comment-32467</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circumactio Absurdus by David Owens</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/4Lc2KPMO6o0/</link>
		<dc:creator>David Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 10:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3392#comment-32466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Montgomery (Burnie / Ulverstone) the two serious candidates (that most commentators suggests would have a close run fight were Leonie Hiscutt and Cheryl Fuller.  Hiscutt got 45.9% of the primary vote, 55.6% two candidate.

She won every single booth bar one micro booth were it was 40 VOTES to 41 VOTES.  See won Acton (at a primary level) with 42.4% of that vote.

Fuller is Deputy Mayor of Ulverstone and pro gay marriage.  How is that anything other than a flogging of the pro gay marriage candidate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Montgomery (Burnie / Ulverstone) the two serious candidates (that most commentators suggests would have a close run fight were Leonie Hiscutt and Cheryl Fuller.  Hiscutt got 45.9% of the primary vote, 55.6% two candidate.</p>
<p>She won every single booth bar one micro booth were it was 40 VOTES to 41 VOTES.  See won Acton (at a primary level) with 42.4% of that vote.</p>
<p>Fuller is Deputy Mayor of Ulverstone and pro gay marriage.  How is that anything other than a flogging of the pro gay marriage candidate?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/4Lc2KPMO6o0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/05/circumactio-absurdus/#comment-32466</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Order in the (Upper) House by Circumactio Absurdus « Journeyman</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/b5UZ8MWsLgQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Circumactio Absurdus « Journeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 06:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3363#comment-32458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and Christianity on May 3rd, 2013Hobart Coffee Rankings 2013Posted in General on April 24th, 2013Order in the (Upper) HousePosted in Politics on April 18th, 2013I wish I&#8217;d never been bornPosted in Grasping Life on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Christianity on May 3rd, 2013Hobart Coffee Rankings 2013Posted in General on April 24th, 2013Order in the (Upper) HousePosted in Politics on April 18th, 2013I wish I&#8217;d never been bornPosted in Grasping Life on [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/b5UZ8MWsLgQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/04/order-in-the-upper-hous/#comment-32458</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ad Hominem and the Postmodern Politic by The Problem of Political Pacifism « Journeyman</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/hA1tLi9VYng/</link>
		<dc:creator>The Problem of Political Pacifism « Journeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3339#comment-32356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We have now seen, as a point of fact, how Giddings/McKim/O&#8217;Byrne do things:  Private Members Bills instead of scrutinised government business, &#8220;discussion papers&#8221; that are one-sided polemics, rushed &#8220;consultation periods&#8221; with no requirement for the submissions to be considered or reported on, dismissive oratory that prejudicially invalidates opposing views, and emotive skewing of the debate towards minor wedge issues and ad hominem. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have now seen, as a point of fact, how Giddings/McKim/O&#8217;Byrne do things:  Private Members Bills instead of scrutinised government business, &#8220;discussion papers&#8221; that are one-sided polemics, rushed &#8220;consultation periods&#8221; with no requirement for the submissions to be considered or reported on, dismissive oratory that prejudicially invalidates opposing views, and emotive skewing of the debate towards minor wedge issues and ad hominem. [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/hA1tLi9VYng" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/04/ad-hominem-and-the-postmodern-politic/#comment-32356</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Tasmanian Thinkers by Megan Sayer</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~3/F2WjzW-yHd4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briggs.id.au/jour/?p=3333#comment-32317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh. I only just saw this. Wow, thank you!! I feel very honored...and humbled. Thank you!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh. I only just saw this. Wow, thank you!! I feel very honored&#8230;and humbled. Thank you!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JourCommentsFeed/~4/F2WjzW-yHd4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://briggs.id.au/jour/2013/04/some-tasmanian-thinkers/#comment-32317</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
