<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
     version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R</link>
      <description>Table of Contents for Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. List of articles from both the latest and EarlyView issues.</description>
      <language>en-US</language>
      <copyright>© The Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</copyright>
      <managingEditor>wileyonlinelibrary@wiley.com (Wiley Online Library)</managingEditor>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Atypon® Literatum™</generator>
      <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
      <ttl>10080</ttl>
      <dc:title>Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
      <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
      <atom:link href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R"
                 rel="self"
                 type="application/atom+xml"/>
      
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70110?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 07:49:27 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:49:27-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70110</guid>
         <title>Access to Mental Health Care Services and Suicide Rates in the United States</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT
We examine the causal effect of improvements in access to mental care providers on suicide rates in the United States. We track the universe of practice locations of psychiatric and psychological health care providers from 2016 to 2019. We construct a county‐level index to measure proximity to these facilities, accounting for local variations in demand for and supply of mental health care services. To address the endogeneity between the location of these medical facilities in a given county, we use the implementation of prescriptive authority for psychologists (RxP$RxP$) as an instrument. Our IV results show a 10% enhancement in access translates to an additional three providers per mile, resulting in a 3% reduction, equivalent to 1.6 fewer suicides per 100,000 population within a county.</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We examine the causal effect of improvements in access to mental care providers on suicide rates in the United States. We track the universe of practice locations of psychiatric and psychological health care providers from 2016 to 2019. We construct a county-level index to measure proximity to these facilities, accounting for local variations in demand for and supply of mental health care services. To address the endogeneity between the location of these medical facilities in a given county, we use the implementation of prescriptive authority for psychologists (RxP$RxP$) as an instrument. Our IV results show a 10% enhancement in access translates to an additional three providers per mile, resulting in a 3% reduction, equivalent to 1.6 fewer suicides per 100,000 population within a county.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Shishir Shakya, 
Agnitra RoyChoudhury
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Access to Mental Health Care Services and Suicide Rates in the United States</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70110</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70110</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70110?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70107?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 22:28:20 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-24T10:28:20-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70107</guid>
         <title>Does Long‐Term Care Subsidy Decrease Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures? Evidence From the Long‐Term Care Insurance in Korea</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT
We examine the effect of government subsidies for long‐term care (LTC) on healthcare utilization and health outcomes in Korea, which exhibits one of the fastest rates of population aging. Using a regression discontinuity design, our intent‐to‐treat estimates indicate that eligibility for subsidized LTC services reduces out‐of‐pocket medical and prescription drug spending by about 20% and 16% of the baseline mean, respectively, and lowers the likelihood of inpatient hospital admission by about 12%. These reductions in healthcare utilization and expenditures are not associated with adverse health outcomes. In particular, eligibility reduces the likelihood of hospital admission due to fractures, which could be a possible channel for these results. Overall, our findings suggest that LTC subsidies can partially offset medical expenditures without negatively affecting the health outcomes of older adults.</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We examine the effect of government subsidies for long-term care (LTC) on healthcare utilization and health outcomes in Korea, which exhibits one of the fastest rates of population aging. Using a regression discontinuity design, our intent-to-treat estimates indicate that eligibility for subsidized LTC services reduces out-of-pocket medical and prescription drug spending by about 20% and 16% of the baseline mean, respectively, and lowers the likelihood of inpatient hospital admission by about 12%. These reductions in healthcare utilization and expenditures are not associated with adverse health outcomes. In particular, eligibility reduces the likelihood of hospital admission due to fractures, which could be a possible channel for these results. Overall, our findings suggest that LTC subsidies can partially offset medical expenditures without negatively affecting the health outcomes of older adults.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
GaYoung Park, 
Youjin Hahn
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Does Long‐Term Care Subsidy Decrease Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures? Evidence From the Long‐Term Care Insurance in Korea</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70107</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70107</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70107?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70109?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:29:16 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-21T08:29:16-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70109</guid>
         <title>DACA's Uncertain Path: How Policy Threats Reshape Economic and Social Gains for Recipients</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT
Since 2012, DACA has provided deportation relief and work authorization to immigrants brought to the United States as children. This study examines how legal and political uncertainty—triggered by the Trump administration's 2017 rescission announcement—reshaped recipients' economic and social outcomes. Using difference‐in‐differences and event‐study methods, we show that early gains in employment and earnings eroded sharply under heightened uncertainty. In contrast, responses along other margins—including health insurance coverage, schooling, and in‐state mobility—proved more resilient and in some cases strengthened over time. Supportive environments, such as sanctuary and low‐enforcement states, attenuate labor market losses and sustain investments in nonlabor outcomes. These findings highlight how policy uncertainty can erode labor market gains while shifting behavior toward protective and longer‐horizon investments.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 2012, DACA has provided deportation relief and work authorization to immigrants brought to the United States as children. This study examines how legal and political uncertainty—triggered by the Trump administration's 2017 rescission announcement—reshaped recipients' economic and social outcomes. Using difference-in-differences and event-study methods, we show that early gains in employment and earnings eroded sharply under heightened uncertainty. In contrast, responses along other margins—including health insurance coverage, schooling, and in-state mobility—proved more resilient and in some cases strengthened over time. Supportive environments, such as sanctuary and low-enforcement states, attenuate labor market losses and sustain investments in nonlabor outcomes. These findings highlight how policy uncertainty can erode labor market gains while shifting behavior toward protective and longer-horizon investments.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Catalina Amuedo‐Dorantes, 
Chunbei Wang
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>DACA's Uncertain Path: How Policy Threats Reshape Economic and Social Gains for Recipients</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70109</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70109</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70109?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70108?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 03:04:18 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-16T03:04:18-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70108</guid>
         <title>JPAM Doctoral Dissertation Listing 2025</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator/>
         <category>DOCTORAL LISTING</category>
         <dc:title>JPAM Doctoral Dissertation Listing 2025</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70108</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70108</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70108?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>DOCTORAL LISTING</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70106?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 23:25:59 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-05T11:25:59-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70106</guid>
         <title>Insurance Coverage and Provision of Opioid Disorder Treatment: Evidence From Medicare</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT
Older adult opioid overdose deaths have increased over the past two decades in the United States. Methadone, one of three medications approved for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, was not covered by Medicare—the primary insurer of Americans 65 years and older—for OUD until 2020. We study the response of opioid treatment programs (OTPs), the only healthcare providers that can dispense methadone for the treatment of OUD in the United States, to this policy change using administrative data and a difference‐in‐differences framework. We find an increase in Medicare acceptance by OTPs and in the number of methadone treatment episodes post‐policy. Further, we document spillovers to other insurance markets and changes in (non‐methadone) treatment services offered by OTPs, suggesting that Medicare's entrance into this market has implications for all OUD patients receiving methadone treatment in OTPs.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Older adult opioid overdose deaths have increased over the past two decades in the United States. Methadone, one of three medications approved for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, was not covered by Medicare—the primary insurer of Americans 65 years and older—for OUD until 2020. We study the response of opioid treatment programs (OTPs), the only healthcare providers that can dispense methadone for the treatment of OUD in the United States, to this policy change using administrative data and a difference-in-differences framework. We find an increase in Medicare acceptance by OTPs and in the number of methadone treatment episodes post-policy. Further, we document spillovers to other insurance markets and changes in (non-methadone) treatment services offered by OTPs, suggesting that Medicare's entrance into this market has implications for all OUD patients receiving methadone treatment in OTPs.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Denis Agniel, 
Jonathan Cantor, 
Johanna Catherine Maclean, 
Erin A. Taylor, 
Kosali Simon
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Insurance Coverage and Provision of Opioid Disorder Treatment: Evidence From Medicare</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70106</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70106</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70106?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70054?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:20:42 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:20:42-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70054</guid>
         <title>Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World by Anne Applebaum. Random House, 2024, 272 pp., $29 (paperback).</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Guzel Garifullina
</dc:creator>
         <category>BOOK REVIEW</category>
         <dc:title>Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World by Anne Applebaum. Random House, 2024, 272 pp., $29 (paperback).</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70054</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70054</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70054?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70055?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:19:31 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:19:31-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70055</guid>
         <title>Disinformation, Misinformation, and Democracy: Legal Approaches in Comparative Context by Ronald J. Krotosynsky Jr., Adrás Koltay, and Charlotte Garden. Cambridge University Press, 2024, 430 pp., $140.00 (hardcover).</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Zoe Tzanis, 
Samuel Woolley
</dc:creator>
         <category>BOOK REVIEW</category>
         <dc:title>Disinformation, Misinformation, and Democracy: Legal Approaches in Comparative Context by Ronald J. Krotosynsky Jr., Adrás Koltay, and Charlotte Garden. Cambridge University Press, 2024, 430 pp., $140.00 (hardcover).</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70055</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70055</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70055?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70056?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:18:55 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:18:55-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70056</guid>
         <title>The effect of compliance assistance on pollution discharges and violations of environmental regulations</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
Abstract
Researchers and policymakers assert competing behavioral models of polluters. One model portrays polluters as best approximated by the perfectly informed, rational actor from economics textbooks. Another model portrays polluters, particularly small and medium facilities, as imperfectly informed, cognitively bounded, pro‐social actors. If this second model is more accurate, environmental programs that offer low‐cost technical assistance may be especially effective in promoting regulatory compliance. Yet the empirical evidence for the effectiveness of such compliance assistance is scant. In a pre‐registered analysis using panel data research designs, we exploit idiosyncratic program roll‐out to estimate the effects of a compliance assistance program that was delivered to hundreds of Ohio water polluters. Although the program was initially deemed a success by federal and state environmental protection agencies, we estimate that, if the program had any effect on polluter behaviors, those effects were small. In our preferred specification, we estimate a precise zero effect of compliance assistance on environmental compliance and pollution. The lack of evidence for behavioral impacts from compliance assistance does not imply such programs cannot be effective, but it does underscore the need for more deliberate evaluation designs when state and federal agencies roll out their compliance assistance interventions.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers and policymakers assert competing behavioral models of polluters. One model portrays polluters as best approximated by the perfectly informed, rational actor from economics textbooks. Another model portrays polluters, particularly small and medium facilities, as imperfectly informed, cognitively bounded, pro-social actors. If this second model is more accurate, environmental programs that offer low-cost technical assistance may be especially effective in promoting regulatory compliance. Yet the empirical evidence for the effectiveness of such compliance assistance is scant. In a pre-registered analysis using panel data research designs, we exploit idiosyncratic program roll-out to estimate the effects of a compliance assistance program that was delivered to hundreds of Ohio water polluters. Although the program was initially deemed a success by federal and state environmental protection agencies, we estimate that, if the program had any effect on polluter behaviors, those effects were small. In our preferred specification, we estimate a precise zero effect of compliance assistance on environmental compliance and pollution. The lack of evidence for behavioral impacts from compliance assistance does not imply such programs cannot be effective, but it does underscore the need for more deliberate evaluation designs when state and federal agencies roll out their compliance assistance interventions.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Paul J. Ferraro, 
Jay P. Shimshack
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>The effect of compliance assistance on pollution discharges and violations of environmental regulations</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70056</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70056</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70056?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70053?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:17:14 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:17:14-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70053</guid>
         <title>The impact of granting undocumented immigrants driver's licenses on fatal crashes</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of granting undocumented immigrants driver's licenses on fatal crashes. Using county‐level crash data from the Fatality and Injury Reporting System Tool, I leverage the quasi‐randomness of the timing of the driver's license reforms adoption across states to identify the causal effect of driver's license reforms. My findings show that granting undocumented immigrants driver's licenses increases overall fatal crashes by nearly 5%, equivalent to 0.46 more fatal crashes in a county per year. The effect is stronger in states with a higher population of undocumented immigrants. By investigating the mechanism through which the policy impact is likely to occur, I show that undocumented immigrants may be more likely to engage in risky driving behavior once they obtain driver's licenses. Several robustness checks and placebo tests support my main findings.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper examines the effect of granting undocumented immigrants driver's licenses on fatal crashes. Using county-level crash data from the Fatality and Injury Reporting System Tool, I leverage the quasi-randomness of the timing of the driver's license reforms adoption across states to identify the causal effect of driver's license reforms. My findings show that granting undocumented immigrants driver's licenses increases overall fatal crashes by nearly 5%, equivalent to 0.46 more fatal crashes in a county per year. The effect is stronger in states with a higher population of undocumented immigrants. By investigating the mechanism through which the policy impact is likely to occur, I show that undocumented immigrants may be more likely to engage in risky driving behavior once they obtain driver's licenses. Several robustness checks and placebo tests support my main findings.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Ruinan Zhao
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>The impact of granting undocumented immigrants driver's licenses on fatal crashes</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70053</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70053</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70053?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70057?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:15:51 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:15:51-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70057</guid>
         <title>The Deadly Rise of Anti‐Science: A Scientist's Warning by Peter J. Hotez. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023, 161 pp., $24.95 (hardcover).</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
MaryBrooke U. Burval
</dc:creator>
         <category>BOOK REVIEW</category>
         <dc:title>The Deadly Rise of Anti‐Science: A Scientist's Warning by Peter J. Hotez. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023, 161 pp., $24.95 (hardcover).</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70057</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70057</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70057?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70058?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:14:21 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:14:21-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70058</guid>
         <title>Measuring the effects of Obergefell v. Hodges: Revisiting same‐sex marriage legalization and mortgage demand</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges made same‐sex marriage legal in all states. We estimate the effect of this landmark ruling on the mortgage demand of same‐sex couples. Using data on the near universe of mortgage applications, we employ a difference‐in‐differences estimation strategy that compares the mortgage demand from same‐sex and different‐sex couples, before and after the ruling. We find that the ruling increased the mortgage demand from same‐sex couples relative to different‐sex couples by 12% in states where same‐sex marriage was previously unavailable. Interestingly, we also estimate a 15% increase in the mortgage demand of same‐sex couples in states that had already legalized same‐sex marriage prior to the ruling. This suggests that the federal Supreme Court ruling brought greater certainty to same‐sex couples, even in states where same‐sex marriage was already legal. Additionally, we find that the effects were significantly larger for same‐sex female couples compared to same‐sex male couples, consistent with prior literature documenting higher marriage take‐up among women in same‐sex relationships. Our results emphasize the importance of federal Supreme Court rulings over and above similar state‐level legislation in shaping outcomes of vulnerable populations.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in &lt;i&gt;Obergefell v. Hodges&lt;/i&gt; made same-sex marriage legal in all states. We estimate the effect of this landmark ruling on the mortgage demand of same-sex couples. Using data on the near universe of mortgage applications, we employ a difference-in-differences estimation strategy that compares the mortgage demand from same-sex and different-sex couples, before and after the ruling. We find that the ruling increased the mortgage demand from same-sex couples relative to different-sex couples by 12% in states where same-sex marriage was previously unavailable. Interestingly, we also estimate a 15% increase in the mortgage demand of same-sex couples in states that had already legalized same-sex marriage prior to the ruling. This suggests that the federal Supreme Court ruling brought greater certainty to same-sex couples, even in states where same-sex marriage was already legal. Additionally, we find that the effects were significantly larger for same-sex female couples compared to same-sex male couples, consistent with prior literature documenting higher marriage take-up among women in same-sex relationships. Our results emphasize the importance of federal Supreme Court rulings over and above similar state-level legislation in shaping outcomes of vulnerable populations.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Nir Eilam, 
Hasan Shahid
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Measuring the effects of Obergefell v. Hodges: Revisiting same‐sex marriage legalization and mortgage demand</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70058</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70058</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70058?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70034?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:11:23 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:11:23-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70034</guid>
         <title>Mentoring, educational preferences, and career choice: Evidence from two field experiments in Bhutan</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
Abstract
We evaluate two randomized controlled trials in Bhutan testing whether near‐peer mentoring can shift students’ educational preferences toward STEM and TVET pathways. Mentors provided personalized guidance, shared their own experiences, and offered information on admissions and labor market outcomes. The interventions significantly increased students’ interest and perceived knowledge, but had limited effects on actual applications or enrollment. In the STEM stream, limited follow‐through appears linked to structural constraints such as academic selectivity and limited program capacity; for TVET, social stigma and parental skepticism likely played a constraining role. These findings highlight the potential of light‐touch, scalable mentoring to shape aspirations, while underscoring the need for complementary strategies to support behavior change and enable follow‐through.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We evaluate two randomized controlled trials in Bhutan testing whether near-peer mentoring can shift students’ educational preferences toward STEM and TVET pathways. Mentors provided personalized guidance, shared their own experiences, and offered information on admissions and labor market outcomes. The interventions significantly increased students’ interest and perceived knowledge, but had limited effects on actual applications or enrollment. In the STEM stream, limited follow-through appears linked to structural constraints such as academic selectivity and limited program capacity; for TVET, social stigma and parental skepticism likely played a constraining role. These findings highlight the potential of light-touch, scalable mentoring to shape aspirations, while underscoring the need for complementary strategies to support behavior change and enable follow-through.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Ryotaro Hayashi, 
Hyuncheol Bryant Kim, 
Norihiko Matsuda, 
Trinh Pham
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH REPORT</category>
         <dc:title>Mentoring, educational preferences, and career choice: Evidence from two field experiments in Bhutan</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70034</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70034</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70034?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH REPORT</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70041?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:10:21 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-10T08:10:21-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206688?af=R">Wiley: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1002/pam.70041</guid>
         <title>Shifting tax incidence: Evidence from the Washington State cannabis market</title>
         <description>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 45, Issue 3, Summer 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
Abstract
We study how prices respond when a 25% gross receipts tax remitted by cannabis manufacturers was eliminated in Washington state and the retail excise tax was simultaneously increased from 25% to 37%. Standard theory suggests that this change should have increased welfare for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers; instead, our analysis shows that the reform unexpectedly shifted benefits toward manufacturers at the expense of retailers and consumers, who faced higher tax‐inclusive prices post‐reform. We hypothesize that this outcome was driven by behavioral factors such as anchoring and loss aversion. Our findings add to a growing body of evidence that tax reforms can affect market outcomes in ways not predicted by standard economic models, offering a cautionary lesson for policymakers considering similar reforms.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We study how prices respond when a 25% gross receipts tax remitted by cannabis manufacturers was eliminated in Washington state and the retail excise tax was simultaneously increased from 25% to 37%. Standard theory suggests that this change should have increased welfare for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers; instead, our analysis shows that the reform unexpectedly shifted benefits toward manufacturers at the expense of retailers and consumers, who faced higher tax-inclusive prices post-reform. We hypothesize that this outcome was driven by behavioral factors such as anchoring and loss aversion. Our findings add to a growing body of evidence that tax reforms can affect market outcomes in ways not predicted by standard economic models, offering a cautionary lesson for policymakers considering similar reforms.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Benjamin Hansen, 
Kendall Houghton, 
Keaton Miller, 
Caroline Weber
</dc:creator>
         <category>RESEARCH ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Shifting tax incidence: Evidence from the Washington State cannabis market</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1002/pam.70041</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1002/pam.70041</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70041?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>RESEARCH ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
