<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2titles.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemtitles.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

    <channel>

    <title>2007 Junk Fax Suit</title>
    <link>http://junkfaxsuit.info/blog.php/fax/</link>
    <description>The faxes are annoying, but the false advertising of mortgages and the health plan, travel and stock scams are deplorable.  The government CONDONES the fraud!</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>christine@bayhouse.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-09-17T02:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />


    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JunkFaxSuit" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
      <title>Jeremy Jaynes gets away with spamming - VA law anti-spam law overturned</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/EmRz66zP-94/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>Legislation &amp; Regulation - news</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The judges should be buried alive in SPAM.</b>
</p>
<p>
These morons have the audacity to rule that I have to receive the mailings of religious nuts, politicians I hate or ANY mail I didn&#8217;t solicited. 
</p>
<p>
These God damned judges enjoy their generous salaries with wonderful benefits and have clerks take care of THEIR spam at the tax payers&#8217; expense.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
<b>Of course I have a choice.</b>  
</p>
<p>
<b>I&#8217;ll just go out of business.</b>
</p>
<p>
I don&#8217;t need to have a public email address.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t need to have a fax machine.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t need to receive any mail.&nbsp; I can just remove myself from society and I can&#8217;t wait for the day when I can afford to do just that.&nbsp; No more business, just one PRIVATE email address for a few select people which I&#8217;ll just change every few months as some idiot puts my email address on some freaking chain letter and I get spammed again.
</p>
<p>
<b>The upside is that these types of rulings GREATLY contribute to the collapse of the economy.</b>  
</p>
<p>
People are continually defrauded and waste their time on spam INSTEAD of being productive.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
The mail from prospective clients is in the SPAM trap and I sure don&#8217;t have time to go through the LITERALLY many thousands of spams I get at my public email addresses.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
You can&#8217;t imagine how many spammers submit comments at my blogs.&nbsp; America is one sick country, everything revolves around marketing and it just about marketed itself to death. 
</p>
<p>
It would make my day if one day these judges had to get a REAL job and find out what it&#8217;s like to WORK because the government is bankrupt and their paychecks bounce.
</p>
<p>
The way things are going, I&#8217;m hopeful ...
</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://articles.top501.nu/2008/09/16/top501-it-va-law-struck-down-spam-kingpin-goes-free/" title="Top501 IT: Va. Law Struck Down, Spam Kingpin Goes Free">Top501 IT: Va. Law Struck Down, Spam Kingpin Goes Free</a>
</p>
<p>
In reversing the conviction of spammer Jeremy Jaynes, the court said the law is unconstitutional because it restricts more than just commercial e-mails. Justice G. Steven Agee said the law “is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails, including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” the Post reported. Many other states have regulated unsolicited bulk e-mail but, unlike Virginia, have restricted such regulation to commercial e-mails. There is nothing in the record or arguments of the parties, however, suggesting that unsolicited non-commercial bulk e-mails were the target of this legislation, caused increased costs to the Internet service providers, or were otherwise a focus of the problem sought to be addressed. Therefore, viewed under the strict scrutiny standard is not narrowly tailored to protect the compelling interests advanced by the Commonwealth. The court held that the law “is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails, including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.” According to this AP report, Jaynes’ attorney, Thomas Wolf, has said sending commercial spam would still be illegal under the federal The judges ruled that because the law does not discern between commercial and other forms of mass email, it places an unconstitutional restriction on free speech. “That statute is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk emails including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” the court said in its ruling.
</p>
<p>
Even though Jeremy Jaynes is indeed guilty, people tend to have extremely different opinions with some in favor of the decision and others very upset. “That statute is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution,” the ruling stated. Jeremy Jaynes is not available for comments at this time and his official statement should arrive over the weekend. Action under the Can-Spam Act may be unlikely; it wasn’t signed until December 2003, when Jaynes was already being arrested. The Virginia law “is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails, including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” Justice G. Steven Agee wrote.
</p>
<p>
...</p></blockquote><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/EmRz66zP-94" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-09-17T02:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/jeremy_jaynes_gets_away_with_spamming_va_law_anti_spam_law_overturned/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>Optima lost appeal of dismissed junk fax Unfair Practices Suit</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/dj9m-jDi3Lw/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject />
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Court of Appeal affirmed the superior court dismissal of the Optima suit on 5/16/07:
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/B191875.PDF" title="Optima v. Strang">Optima v. Strang</a>
</p>
<p>
I wish I had time to sue Optima too, <a href="http://fight-back.us/forum/index.php?showforum=73" title="see my postings at Fight Back!!!">see my postings at Fight Back!!!</a>
</p>
<p>
While I have over 2 more years until  the SOL expires, Optima will probably be out of business soon, like the rest of the junk faxing lying mortgage scum.&nbsp; I hope they pay the attorneys fees for the appeal.
<br />

</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/dj9m-jDi3Lw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-05-18T04:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/optima_lost_appeal_of_dismissed_junk_fax_unfair_practices_suit/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>Hot Leads (sold leads to First Magnus) is STILL faxing</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/x1nIhDaERgU/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>10/5/04 AZ Superior Court suit, Mortgages, First Magnus dba Great Southwest Mortgage -- SETTLED</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7006697576" title="Despite Being Illegal, "The Hot Lead" Company of Texas Still Sends Unsolicited Spam Faxes">Despite Being Illegal, &#8220;The Hot Lead&#8221; Company of Texas Still Sends Unsolicited Spam Faxes</a>
</p>
<blockquote><p>Despite Being Illegal, &#8220;The Hot Lead&#8221; Company of Texas Still Sends Unsolicited Spam Faxes
</p>
<p>
March 9, 2007 4:51 p.m. EST
</p>
<p>
Linda Young - All Headline News Staff Writer
<br />
West Palm Beach, FL (AHN) - Although unsolicited fax advertisements are illegal, barred by the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, companies still spam broadcast faxes that many recipients view as junk.
</p>
<p>
Worse, the unwanted faxes keep fax machines tied up wasting a lot of ink and paper, as well as tying up telephone lines.
</p>
<p>
Individuals as well as businesses complain about the unwanted spam faxes.
</p>
<p>
All those things were reasons that Congress created a law in 1991 that prohibited faxing unsolicited advertisement without &#8220;prior express invitation or permission&#8221; from the fax recipient.
</p>
<p>
One company that has ignored that law is known by many names and has been in and out of courts in several states. The Hot Lead Company of Texas, led by Greg Horne, president, is in plenty of hot water.
</p>
<p>
In May 2006, the Federal Communications Administration accused Hot Lead of violating the nation&#8217;s telecommunications act, citing half a dozen complaints against it. 
</p>
<p>
But before changing its name to Hot Lead the company had racked up complaints and legal action doing business as American Blast Fax, and it&#8217;s owners were Mike Horne aka Michael G. Horne aka Michael Gregory Horne and Greg Horne according to JunkFax.com.
</p>
<p>
In a statement on its Web site JunkFax.com said: &#8220;Despite losing millions in court (judgments they never pay), and despite numerous injunctions (that they all ignore), they just change the name of their company and do the same fax broadcasting over and over and over again. I personally get their faxes and I get more complaints about them than any other company on the entire website.&#8221; 
</p>
<p>
The Minnesota Attorney General wrote a letter dated Sept. 11, 2006, concerning the Hot Lead company. It was in response to a complaint that Mike Horne and Greg Horne and their companies were violating a Sept. 2002 Minnesota injunctive order and still sending out junk faxes under the company name My Hot Leads. The Attorney General wrote that the Hornes&#8217;s companies were known as The Hot Lead Company, My Hot Leads or Sunbelt Communications. 
</p>
<p>
During a telephone interview Scott Nickenson, who only identified himself as an employee, confirmed that Hot Leads, My Hot Leads and Sunbelt Marketing were all company names where he worked, along with many others that he would not list. He also confirmed that Greg Horne was the president of all the companies.
</p>
<p>
What he wouldn&#8217;t confirm was where Hot Leads, etc., obtained the numbers they sent faxes to, or on what basis they chose the businesses that they spam-fax. 
</p>
<p>
Hot Leads has sent several unsolicited spam-faxes offering hot leads for business that sell mortgages, health insurance and life insurance to AHN, which is in the business of reporting the news. 
</p>
<p>
When AHN told Nickerson that, and asked him why Hot Leads sent a news agency numerous faxes advertising hot leads for mortgage and insurance customers he referred AHN to manager Steve Faulkner. Last week Faulkner skirted those questions and has not returned calls from AHN.
</p>
<p>
A woman who answered the phone said that Hot Leads was located in Dallas, Texas, but she would not give an address.
</p>
<p>
JunkFax.com lists these as the company names that Hot Leads also uses:
</p>
<p>
American Blast Fax
<br />
CMG Marketing LLC
<br />
Cammas Group LLC
<br />
RMG Communications LLC
<br />
Dallas Doorhanger
<br />
American Life Quotes, LLC
<br />
The Fax Guide, Inc
<br />
American Quick Quote LLC
<br />
Sunbelt Communication and Marketing LLC
<br />
Sunbelt Marketing
<br />
American Blast Fax</p></blockquote>
<p>
They made a mistake when they referenced junkfax.com, it is <a href="http://junkfax.ORG/">http://junkfax.ORG/</a>.&nbsp; Other than that, quite informative.&nbsp; I knew I would have been wasting my time going after them instead of First Magnus&#8212;they don&#8217;t pay the judgments and they ignore the injunctions.
</p>
<p>
<b>And the regulaters are doing WHAT?</b>
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/x1nIhDaERgU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-03-10T05:11:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/hot_leads_sold_leads_to_first_magnus_is_still_faxing/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>Settled with First Magnus after appeals court order to remand</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/NwbOamjQkCQ/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>10/5/04 AZ Superior Court suit, Mortgages, First Magnus dba Great Southwest Mortgage -- SETTLED</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to post that here, we settled just before Christmas.&nbsp; I had to appeal corrupt local Justice of the Peace John Taylor&#8217;s bizarre dismissal and the $6,400 attorneys fee award to First Magnus for attending a single hearing.&nbsp; I finally got the appeals court&#8217;s ruling to remand in November, but I didn&#8217;t even get my superseadas bond back until after we settled.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
More and the corrupt justice system at <a href="http://creditsuit.org/credit.php?/blog/comments/settled_with_first_magnus_despite_kangaroo_court_corrupt_judge_taylor/" title="Settled with First Magnus—despite Kangaroo Court, corrupt judge John Taylor and regulators">Settled with First Magnus—despite Kangaroo Court, corrupt judge John Taylor and regulators</a>
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/NwbOamjQkCQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T23:14:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/settled_with_first_magnus_after_appeals_court_order_to_remand/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>FCC citations obtained through the Freedom of Information Act</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/px5TPRWsZMc/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>FCC Citations</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC Citations&#8212; If they contain &#8220;Response&#8221; in the name of the file then there was a response - otherwise there was no response to the citation.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/ArasMarketing_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/ArasMarketing_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/BusinessPaymentSystems_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/BusinessPaymentSystems_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/CapitalHealthDental_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/CapitalHealthDental_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/CNAMortgageGroup_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/CNAMortgageGroup_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/CornerstoneManagementEnterprises_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/CornerstoneManagementEnterprises_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/ExetechofFlorida_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/ExetechofFlorida_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/FleetProUsa_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/FleetProUsa_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/GlobalMarketingNetwork_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/GlobalMarketingNetwork_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/MoneyWarehouse_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/MoneyWarehouse_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/NationalSeminars_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/NationalSeminars_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/OnDemandMarketing_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/OnDemandMarketing_Citation_Enclosure_Response.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/PATLive_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/PATLive_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/PinnacleSuretyServices_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/PinnacleSuretyServices_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/RMMarketing_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/RMMarketing_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/ShieldingSteel_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/ShieldingSteel_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/UnitedSteelAluminum_Citation_Enclosure.pdf">http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/UnitedSteelAluminum_Citation_Enclosure.pdf</a>
<br />

</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/px5TPRWsZMc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-01-19T16:41:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/fcc_citations_obtained_through_the_freedom_of_information_act/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>The FCC’s annual report on unsolicited faxes and citations</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/xd2m2n0sGdU/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>Hot</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see many familiar names of junk faxers and defendants:
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-16A1.pdf" title="FCC ANNUAL REPORT ON UNSOLICITED FACSIMILE ADVERTISEMENTS">FCC ANNUAL REPORT ON UNSOLICITED FACSIMILE ADVERTISEMENTS</a>
</p>
<p>
Notably absent are the links to the citations and some accounting:
</p>
<p>
How much did the FCC collect?
</p>
<p>
I just read that the FCC stopped posting the citations.&nbsp;   If that&#8217;s true, it means that litigants can no longer prove that faxes were sent after citations (since we won&#8217;t know about them) to get the treble damages.&nbsp; 
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/xd2m2n0sGdU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-01-07T22:32:01Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/the_fccs_annual_report_on_unsolicited_faxes_and_citations/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>Baker v. First Magnus - remanded to justice court</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/a9HbSI87qlY/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>Hot</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been doing much with faxes since I once again was the victim of Justice of the Peace John Taylor.&nbsp;  This time I appealed and it took 6 months to get the superior court ruling to remand to justice court.
</p>
<p>
It is incredible how First Magnus lied and their attorney Ali Farhang with Fennemore Craig is one of these bottom feeding scum sucking lying lawyers.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
So, I&#8217;m ready to schedule depos and I really wish I knew more about AZ rules.&nbsp; Having been mostly in federal court, this is hard for me.&nbsp; I&#8217;m just glad I got to practice deposing with the Experian employees, so I&#8217;m ready to document their lies.
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;ll probably amend my complaint too.
</p>
<p>
My e-mail to attorney Farhang:
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/a9HbSI87qlY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2006-11-21T20:58:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/baker_v_first_magnus_remanded_to_justice_court/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>CBSK - American Home Loans out of business?&amp;nbsp; Counsel withdraws</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/RDZBuUCMP-k/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>10/5/04 AZ Superior Court suit, Mortgages, CBSK (American Home Loans)</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Beaugureau, Zukowski &amp; Hancock <a href="http://forum.creditcourt.com/discus/messages/5136/7350.html" title="5/10/06&#8212;Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record">5/10/06&#8212;Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record</a> and counsel Amy Schwartz Certificate: &#8220;CBSK has failed to substantially fulfill their obligations to Counsel regarding Counsel&#8217;s services.&nbsp; I have advised CBSK on numerous occasions, both verbally and in writing, over the past three months, that Counsel will withdraw unless CBSK&#8217;s obligations are fulfilled.&nbsp; To date CBSK has failed to fulfill its obligations, or even respond.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Hmmm, sounds like they didn&#8217;t pay their bill.&nbsp; Any info on the CBSK situation is greatly appreciated.
</p>
<p>
I sent this URL to CBSK attorney Russell Grandy for comments.
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/RDZBuUCMP-k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2006-06-01T20:32:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/cbsk_american_home_loans_out_of_business_counsel_withdraws/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>First Choice Healthcare FCC forfeiture $776,500</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/7l_NIkVVLts/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject />
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/13/04, the FCC issued the citation with the imposition of up to $11,000 for subsequent faxes.&nbsp; First Choice didn&#8217;t respond.&nbsp; The FCC got numerous complaints and on 2/28/06 the FCC released its Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture of $776,500.
</p>
<p>
Joe Shields posted the documentation he received from the FCC in response to his FOIA request:
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ttcpa.oklahoma-isp.net/FCCFOIA/FirstChoiceHealthcare_NAL_enclosure.pdf" title="The First Choice faxes and FCC docs">The First Choice faxes and FCC docs</a>
</p>
<p>
Why does Joe need to go through the hassle of submitting the request?&nbsp; Why doesn&#8217;t the FCC post the faxes?&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
I recently read that the FCC actually never collects any of the forfeitures.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s true (please let me know if you have info on that), but if so, why the hell are they wasting our money on this crap?
</p>
<p>
Also, I noticed that Leads To Health (Health One / Nationwide Benefits) is mentioned on some of the faxes.
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/7l_NIkVVLts" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2006-05-11T21:06:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/first_choice_healthcare_fcc_forfeiture_776500/</feedburner:origLink></item>

    <item>
      <title>The 4/5/06 FCC Report and Order regarding the Junk Fax Prevention Act</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~3/wRg8EAC5xNA/</link>
      <description />
      <dc:subject>Legislation &amp; Regulation - news</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in all, it&#8217;s not nearly as bad as it could have been.&nbsp; The Existing Business Relationship is defined in detail and the junk faxers won&#8217;t be happy about this.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-42A1.pdf" title="REPORT AND ORDER AND THIRD ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION">REPORT AND ORDER AND THIRD ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION</a>
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;m getting more mortgage junk faxes than ever.&nbsp;  Business must be bad.
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JunkFaxSuit/~4/wRg8EAC5xNA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2006-04-07T05:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://creditsuit.org/credit.php/fax/the_4_5_06_fcc_report_and_order_regarding_the_junk_fax_prevention_act/</feedburner:origLink></item>


    </channel>
</rss>
