<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just A Word (or two) From Steve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve.heyvan.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve.heyvan.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Technology, Reviews and Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Warning Deleting Active Directory Computer as a Container</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2014/10/27/warning-deleting-active-directory-computer-as-a-container/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2014/10/27/warning-deleting-active-directory-computer-as-a-container/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently cleaning up a lot of old computer accounts in Active Directory, when I encountered the following message on a some of them: To dig into this a bit further, I went to View-&#62;Users, Contacts, Groups and Computers as containers from the Active Directory Users and Groups MMC.  With this view, I expanded [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2014/10/27/warning-deleting-active-directory-computer-as-a-container/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building SSO on Joomla 2.5 with Active Directory</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2014/07/27/building-sso-on-joomla-2-5-with-active-directory/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2014/07/27/building-sso-on-joomla-2-5-with-active-directory/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently got a request to add SSO to our IT self-service web portal which is running Joomla 2.5.  Sounded like a good idea as we have been doing as much as we can to make things simpler and easier for our users.  We already had LDAP integration and I thought if I could find [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2014/07/27/building-sso-on-joomla-2-5-with-active-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CWMS Not Ready for Production</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2013/04/21/cwms-not-ready-for-production/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2013/04/21/cwms-not-ready-for-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First a little history:  We have been using Cisco Conferencing solutions now for over eight years.  We started with Conference Connection which was a software solution from a company in England and re-branded by Cisco.  It had problems with jitter and QoS, but it was acceptable.  Later, Cisco acquired Latitude and released MeetingPlace.  We started [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2013/04/21/cwms-not-ready-for-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connecting CWMS to ADFS 2.0</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2013/04/06/connecting-cwms-to-adfs-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2013/04/06/connecting-cwms-to-adfs-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After installing the Cisco WebEx Meetings Server (CWMS), the time came for integration with Microsoft Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS).  The MS-Windows administrator for our company installed ADFS 2.0 on an internal server and we issued a single certificate from our certificate authority to it.  We used that same certificate for all three roles &#8212; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2013/04/06/connecting-cwms-to-adfs-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Certutil -getkey requires administrator?  Not always.</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2012/10/14/certutil-getkey-requires-administrator-not-always/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2012/10/14/certutil-getkey-requires-administrator-not-always/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certificate authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public key certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public-key cryptography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I had the need to export a certificate with it&#8217;s key.  However, by default, we automatically issue computer certificates to every computer in our domain, but without the ability to export them with their key for security reasons.  I had one of my administrators do a little research and document how we could recover [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2012/10/14/certutil-getkey-requires-administrator-not-always/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Forget Lync when you update your Exchange Certificates</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2012/06/02/dont-forget-lync-when-you-update-your-exchange-certificates/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2012/06/02/dont-forget-lync-when-you-update-your-exchange-certificates/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had been on our new Exchange 2010 environment for almost a year when we decided to add Lync 2010 to the mix.  For this effort we used an outside consulting firm, and while I do not mean to discredit third-party integrators the fact of the matter is that they do not take the time [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2012/06/02/dont-forget-lync-when-you-update-your-exchange-certificates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lync Integration with Exchange UM &#8211; The &#8220;SUBJECT&#8221; matters</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/12/02/lync-integration-with-exchange-um-the-subject-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/12/02/lync-integration-with-exchange-um-the-subject-matters/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently installed Lync 2010 and integrated it with our Exchange 2010 Unified Messaging (UM).  Everything seemed to go smoothly and we have since released it to all of our users.  We are getting great positive feedback and wanted to enhance the offering.  To that end, we started playing with Polycom CX100/200/300 devices (I hope [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/12/02/lync-integration-with-exchange-um-the-subject-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Careful Client Planning Needed During Migration From Exchange 2003 to 2010</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/07/30/careful-client-planning-needed-during-migration-from-exchange-2003-to-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/07/30/careful-client-planning-needed-during-migration-from-exchange-2003-to-2010/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently took on the migration of our enterprise E-mail system from Exchange 2003 to 2010.  In this article, I want to talk about the need to understand your client connection requirements before taking the plunge. Like most companies, we are still on Outlook 2003 and Windows XP.  Our remote users access the E-mail with [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/07/30/careful-client-planning-needed-during-migration-from-exchange-2003-to-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Add-ADPermissions is not enough to read all mailboxes on Exchange 2010</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/04/14/add-adpermissions-is-not-enough-to-read-all-mailboxes-on-exchange-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/04/14/add-adpermissions-is-not-enough-to-read-all-mailboxes-on-exchange-2010/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have recently upgraded from Exchange 2003 to 2010 and we are still in the midst of the details.  At first glance, it would seem that the biggest hurdle is to get a good understanding of the differences and plan your migration.  However, we have found the undocumented details about how to configure a number [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/04/14/add-adpermissions-is-not-enough-to-read-all-mailboxes-on-exchange-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expand LUNs with ESX and not vCenter</title>
		<link>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/04/02/expand-luns-with-esx-and-not-vcenter/</link>
		<comments>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/04/02/expand-luns-with-esx-and-not-vcenter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 00:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve.heyvan.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we upgraded to vSphere 4.1, there was nothing different about the way we expanded LUNs.  We have three EqualLogic iSCSI SAN arrays for storage and two IBM BladeCenters.  If we needed more space, the process was quite simple go to the web interface of the SAN and expanded the LUN using vCenter, click on a host [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://steve.heyvan.com/2011/04/02/expand-luns-with-esx-and-not-vcenter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
