The newest Facebook Fan Page you might want to read: The HSPE test sounds like an STD. The page was created just a few days ago and it already has 8,602 fans. I know there’s at least one Central Kitsap kid who is a fan (because he’s my friend and I saw it on his page.) Any others out there?

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Superintendent Flip Herndon will speak about what type of kindergarten will be offered in BSD next year. The school district has provided free all-day kindergarten for many years at all of its elementary schools. The state pays for ADK at four of those schools because the children there live in families with incomes below the poverty line; BSD has funded ADK at its two other elementaries out of its general fund. With the state budget getting leaner and leaner and less funding coming to schools, it looks like BSD is faced with the a decision over whether it can offer free ADK next year. The state budget is not completed yet so the exact cuts to schools’ budget is not known, but it looks like the Bremerton board will talk about this tonight – with a possible decision – so that parents and families and the schools can begin preparing plans for the fall.

The board will also hear a report about a potential new Montessori program in BSD at the Naval Avenue Early Learning Center. A private preschool and kindergarten Montessori is already housed there; parents whose children are in that program and Bremerton parents whose children don’t currently attend Bremeton schools (either in a private school or schooled at home) have been asking BSD to set up a program for grades 1 through 3. I’ve included the report on the program below.

Montessori Memo March 18 2010

Montessori Plan March 18 2010

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

I know one of the motivations behind changing the name of the WASL involved concerns that the actual term “WASL” had become such negative baggage for the state test. For some folks, WASL became an epithet. I can kinda see that, especially given the wrath that could rain down on a school where student scores were low.

So is HSPE better? What about MSP? (Again I’ve been saying M-S-P because that’s what my younger kids are saying.)  I do know that both HSPE and WASL are better than the name of the test in Virginia. That’s SOL and if you grew up in the 1980s like me, S-O-L meant something pretty derogatory.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Education Week published a story on March 13 that goes into great detail about the proposed changes in the law. Lots of folks have chimed in since the announcements too. Here are some links to a few pieces from news organization around the country:

The LA Times

USA Today

USA Today Part II

The Washington Post

The Washington Post, Part II

The Wall Street Journal

I think lots of folks – educators, parents, taxpayers – were glad to learn that NCLB would be overhauled, especially as that magical year, 2014, approached. That was the year every school child in America would be “proficient” in math and reading. And unicorns would run free across the earth too. (Oopps, did I type that out loud?)

So Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan do propose to eliminate the 2014 deadline and there are other parts of NCLB that will be softened up, including sanctions for many so-called “failing schools” that were failing simply because of the law’s convoluted way of configuring failing. See, even that explanation doesn’t make sense. Instead schools will be labeled as high performing, needs improvement and chronically low performing. Will this make sense? I guess we have to wait and see.

But the new NCLB proposal is not without critics or criticisms. The Obama/Duncan plan still relies pretty heavily on standardized testing and opens up testing to include subjects beyond reading and math. This is supposed to widen the focus of teaching and curriculum beyond the narrow scope on reading and math that was the result of the focus on testing only those subjects under NCLB. It’s good that the focus of teaching and curriculum will be widened, I’m not sure more testing is the best way to convey that fact.

There are lots of other little quirky things that come under fire, but the one thing I’ve heard over and over for the past few days is the concern that the Obama/Duncan plan links test scores to teacher performance evaluations and to teacher pay. Leaders of teachers unions are labeling it “scapegoating.”

Remember, these are broad outlines of a blueprint for education, not set-in-stone plans. It will be interesting to watch them unfold and be shaped and changed into the reauthorization of federal education legislation. One thing about education, it’s never dull.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Four local school districts (NK, CK, Bremerton and BI) just passed new school support levies in February. Last spring it was North Mason. So local voters right now seem inclined to support schools with local tax dollars, despite the sagging economy. But will this measure push voters just that much too far? And will local school districts take advantage of it? I wrote about this issue back in February when voters approved those four levies.  At that time, school leaders seem disinclined to think they would ask voters to raise their levy lids.

School district leaders pointed out that the raising the levy lid will simply mean that more of the school funding burden is shifted back to local tax dollars. That, in turn, creates more disparity across the state between property-rich and property-poor districts.

It sort of reminds me of what happened back in the 1970s when state funding ebbed, local dollars had to flow. At one point, local levy dollars made up an average of 25 percent of school budgets. In Seattle, voters failed two local levies in a row, causing a 37 percent dip in funding for Seattle Public Schools. Follow this timeline and you can see how education funding has changed over the years. After several state Supreme Court rulings recalibrated the funding forumlas, local levies dollar contributions to school budgets fell to just 5 percent in the early 1980s.

Looks like to me we’re on our way back to the future.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

The state Office of the Superintendent for Public Instruction lists the common core standards on its website. You can check it out here. A Washington Post story last week had some good information too.

It’s easy to see the benefit of these standards in a highly mobile society. I was just talking with my sophomore today about how he (a military child) has taken physical science three times. On the other hand, it’s hard in this massive, diverse country to believe that one size really can fit all when it comes to education. Maybe the key is in how the standards are taught – instruction can be individual but standards are the same?

The other question that comes to my mind is the amount of time, money, energy, sheer will that has gone into writing the academic standards for this state. And the same amount or more that has been vested in writing the tests to measure whether the students are meeting those standards. Is that all tossed out the window with these new standards?

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Check out the link here.

Not many days left in the session, so hopefull we’ll know soon what to expect.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Both are untrue.

CK spokesman David Beil said that there was a rumor of a gun at the dance on Friday night. A deputy at the dance followed up on the rumor and found the student in question was armed with only a cell phone. As for the kid shooting at cars on Friday afternoon, Sheriff’s spokesman Scott Wilson said there was a report of some junior-high age kids shooting a BB gun in the general direction of cars but not in the vicinity of a local school.

Hope that clears that up for folks.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

In a story that aired this morning on NPR, Ravitch said NCLB has put education in America “on the wrong track.” Her biggest concern? Standardized testing – the cornerstone, centerpiece, the crux of NCLB. Under the bi-partisan law adopted way back in 2001, if students don’t make incremental progress in their scores on standardized tests (known as adequately yearly progress) then schools are punished.

Read more of what Ravitch had to say here. For probably more detailed information than you ever wanted about NCLB, read here.

NCLB always puzzled me, even way back in 2002. That year I worked as the full-time education reporter at the Sun (I am freelance now) and the paper was kind enough to send me to a press education summit about NCLB down at the University of Southern California. We actually had cocktails and dinner one night with Rod Paige, the education secretary at the time. Looking back it all seems a little surreal that I had the chance to meet the education secretary who would set NCLB in motion. Anyway, during cocktails we all gathered around Paige trying to get in a question or two. I can’t remember who asked (I’d like to think it was me but I truly can’t remember) Paige whether NCLB would eventually implode on itself. Because eventually all schools would be on a list of not making adequately yearly progress. Let’s face it, schools aren’t making little widgets that will come out perfectly if teachers just get their teaching perfect. Schools are working with humans – as flawed and complicated as any creature on this planet. I recall Paige’s response being appropriately vague and something about setting the bar high. Looking back, how was he going to respond to a question like that anyway, especially as NCLB was just getting underway? 

But since that time, we have watched schools slowly slide in adequately year progress and slip onto the “improvement” list. Schools that receive Title I federal education funding face sanctions; those that don’t receive Title I funds aren’t affected.  Title I, given to schools where a lot of students qualify for free and reduced lunch, is one of the few “hammers” the feds can use to enforce NCLB.

Despite my criticism of Ravitch realizing too little too late, I do find what she says about the focus of NCLB intriguing. From the NPR story:

“The basic strategy is measuring and punishing,” Ravitch says of No Child Left Behind. “And it turns out as a result of putting so much emphasis on the test scores, there’s a lot of cheating going on, there’s a lot of gaming the system. Instead of raising standards it’s actually lowered standards because many states have ‘dumbed down’ their tests or changed the scoring of their tests to say that more kids are passing than actually are.

Some states contend that 80 to 90 percent of their children are proficient readers and have math proficiency as well, Ravitch notes. But in the same states, only 25 to 30 of the children test at a proficient level on national tests such as the National Assessment of Educational Progress.”

Once again, I think it’s apparent that there is no magic bullet for the massive public education system in America.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post