<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Knowledge Is Necessity</title><link>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/</link><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/KnowledgeIsNecessity" /><description>Musings on Mental Health: From God to Neurons</description><language>en</language><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:57:25 PST</lastBuildDate><generator>Blogger http://www.blogger.com</generator><openSearch:totalResults xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/">828</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/">1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/">25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><feedburner:info uri="knowledgeisnecessity" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><media:keywords>Knowledge,is,Necessity,mental,health,depression,bipolar,recovery,John,McManamy</media:keywords><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Health/Self-Help</media:category><itunes:owner><itunes:email>noreply@blogger.com</itunes:email><itunes:name>John McManamy</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>John McManamy</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:keywords>Knowledge,is,Necessity,mental,health,depression,bipolar,recovery,John,McManamy</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>Musings on Mental Health</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Recovery begins with knowledge, including self-knowledge. Award-winning author and journalist John McManamy takes you on a journey ...</itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Health"><itunes:category text="Self-Help" /></itunes:category><item><title>Rerun: McMan's Dispensable Rules and Observations for Right Living</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/IvzX1jWhSQU/rerun-mcmans-dispensable-rules-and.html</link><category>right living</category><category>wisdom</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:18:07 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-8886739345202903052</guid><description>I've been tied up with a lot of volunteer work and work on new projects. Looking forward to returning to live posting fairly soon. In the meantime, this from April last year ...

My grandson’s birth in Sept 2009 inspired me to come up with two posts along the lines of the clan elder (me) offering his sage advice to the newest member of the tribe. The piece below represents a reshuffle of my&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/IvzX1jWhSQU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-25T09:18:07.139-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-A91NjNIohZE/Sr7krJErHaI/AAAAAAAAAmE/Tjdqcecb_nw/s72-c/screen-capture-6.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/rerun-mcmans-dispensable-rules-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Rerun: Is Republicanism the New Stupid?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/ozEsT4WfhgM/rerun-is-republicanism-new-stupid.html</link><category>republicanism</category><category>brain science</category><category>stupid</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:42:36 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1313401399714870732</guid><description>From Sept, 2010, still relevant ...

"Republicanism isn't a party. It's a diagnosis." A friend of mine happened to relate that to me in a conversation about a year ago, and I have no reason to dispute it. In fact, we actually have the brain science to lend credence to his statement. The same findings also indict Democrats, though I would contend there are mitigating circumstances. It breaks down&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/ozEsT4WfhgM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-23T20:42:36.087-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iL75wcGkroE/TH61wplu5EI/AAAAAAAABto/K_Ip1Ium8d8/s72-c/Diesel-Be-Stupid-elephant.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/rerun-is-republicanism-new-stupid.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Rerun - Presidents Day Special: Lincoln and His Depressions</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/QYJlNWUINPM/rerun-presidents-day-special-lincoln.html</link><category>depression</category><category>Lincoln</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:07:03 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1963078316910874401</guid><description>I originally published this as a newsletter piece in 2005 and soon after on mcmanweb. Enjoy ...

The year is 1860. In a makeshift meeting hall, the Illinois   delegation to the approaching Republican Convention is meeting to   consider which of their own to back as a favorite son for the   Presidential nomination. There is no clear-cut favorite. Moreover, it’s   widely acknowledged the choice&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/QYJlNWUINPM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-20T13:07:03.277-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Zi7EFDbhJtU/TWLNtbLFVTI/AAAAAAAAB3Y/OjFGp7o3Pqw/s72-c/Lincoln-Memorial1.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/rerun-presidents-day-special-lincoln.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Is Bereavement Part of Depression? And What the Hell is Depression, Anyway?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/XsKfUZV1Huc/is-bereavement-part-of-depression-and.html</link><category>Willa Goodfellow</category><category>depression</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>Ronald Pies</category><category>bereavement</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:46:20 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-6792458571037682249</guid><description>Willa Goodfellow’s latest Prozac Monologues piece raises the very important discussion about how bereavement fits (or not) into depression. Ronald Pies, one of the two principal figures behind the proposed DSM-5 “bereavement exclusion” to the depression diagnosis, has left a comment. 

The discussion is framed in such a way that the nominal topic - bereavement - unlocks the key to the real issue&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/XsKfUZV1Huc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-17T15:46:20.732-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-F8Ki--PELCw/Tz7W4kEXmBI/AAAAAAAACMo/lkktIqVsxNw/s72-c/mood.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/is-bereavement-part-of-depression-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Willa Goodfellow's Prozac Monologues: Still Going Strong</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/bVti4UY2H5w/willa-goodfellows-prozac-monologues.html</link><category>Willa Goodfellow</category><category>Prozac Monologues</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:32:24 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1067440243946504331</guid><description>I’ve been telling people for years that my beat covers everything from God to neurons. A month or two ago, I incorporated “From God to Neurons” into the subtitle of Knowledge is Necessity. In mid-2009, I had the pleasure of discovering online the other person on the planet blogging from God to neurons, Willa Goodfellow (pictured here).

Willa was only a few months into her vastly wise and funny&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/bVti4UY2H5w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-16T22:32:24.764-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hU-gkqKWc5g/Tz3x-aXkP1I/AAAAAAAACMg/3CBxPZl-H_g/s72-c/Lila+Barnett.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/willa-goodfellows-prozac-monologues.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Revisiting the Normal vs Crazy Thing</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/C_kfDBCERUQ/revisiting-normal-vs-crazy-thing.html</link><category>Crazy</category><category>normal</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:03:59 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-367618695139614297</guid><description>Last night, I had a nightmare that I danced like a white man. This was way worse than my recurring dream where I’m married to Sarah Palin. Naturally, it was a huge relief to wake up and - oh crap! - well, at least I’m bipolar.

Most of you know what I’m talking about. We have a different way of perceiving reality, which of course affects our behavior. Too often, the result is outsider status. No&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/C_kfDBCERUQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-16T01:03:59.371-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-poOfMB-j8uU/TzxtNLyV8VI/AAAAAAAACMY/Xeqt9UyhmJw/s72-c/henri-oguike-by-chris-nash-278x318.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/revisiting-normal-vs-crazy-thing.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>In Memoriam: Charles Sakai</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/Kj9JMdEZxD4/in-memoriam-charles-sakai.html</link><category>Charles Sakai</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:35:19 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-862860180963735930</guid><description>I just learned that someone dear to me, Charles Sakai, passed away two or three weeks ago. Charles was a comrade-in-arms - mental health advocate, history buff, and Mahler fan. We’d been in each other’s lives for at least ten years, the last three or so as Facebook friends.

We met online sometime in the very early days of my writing about my illness, around 2000, and exchanged emails&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/Kj9JMdEZxD4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-14T14:35:19.156-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XknKsUE2qNY/TzrdNEiwckI/AAAAAAAACMQ/FIyWpH8o3Dw/s72-c/set.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/in-memoriam-charles-sakai.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Can Integrative Psychiatry Save Psychiatry?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/fMj3bqAopOU/can-integrative-psychiatry-save.html</link><category>Dan Stradford</category><category>Hyla Cass</category><category>integrative psychiatry</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:07:20 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-2654058516715417185</guid><description>Integrative psychiatry involves incorporating complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into clinical practice. I first came across the term in mid-2003 at a two-day conference, “Non-Pharmaceutical Approaches to Mental Disorders” staged in Pasadena by the nonprofit organization, Safe Harbor. 

Two weeks earlier, I had attended the six-day American Psychiatric Association annual meeting in San&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/fMj3bqAopOU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-13T22:07:20.314-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-727rCyeOvCo/TznCTNyS6DI/AAAAAAAACMI/Tsbpc6wlxhM/s72-c/EHC_Hyla_Cass_MD.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/can-integrative-psychiatry-save.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Charles Darwin and Evolutionary Psychiatry</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/KM65Z7pbWb8/charles-darwin-and-evolutionary.html</link><category>Charles Darwin</category><category>evolutionary psychiatry</category><category>evolution</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:07:12 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-61076727787978092</guid><description>In honor of Darwin's 2003rd birthday, from mcmanweb ...

Here's an interesting fact: Peacock tails drove Darwin crazy. The sight of one "makes me sick," he wrote. These feathered accessories played havoc with his work-in-progress theory of natural selection. Surely, any bird stupid enough to flaunt their colors in the wild wouldn't live long enough to mate.

Darwin's solution seems obvious enough&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/KM65Z7pbWb8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-12T10:07:12.481-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2vN757ggjYg/Tzf9jlttP1I/AAAAAAAACMA/sWPOJCrN80k/s72-c/darwinx.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/charles-darwin-and-evolutionary.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Rerun: My Visit to the Local Creationist Museum (Seriously, I'm Not Making This Up)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/i7ej5kGmEIc/rerun-my-visit-to-local-creationist.html</link><category>creationism</category><category>evolution</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:24:53 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-8099008263181501238</guid><description>In honor of Charles Darwin's birthday tomorrow, this piece from Dec 2010 ...

Believe it or not, this museum is only 10 or 12 miles from my home, outside San Diego.


This journey through time will be a very short one, as the entire universe, earth included, according to creationist belief, is only 6,000 years old.


This works way better than carbon-14 dating.


I missed whether it was a&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/i7ej5kGmEIc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-11T11:24:53.032-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iL75wcGkroE/TP9KH5SM5II/AAAAAAAABzo/ePdtU8grRRs/s72-c/1museum.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/rerun-my-visit-to-local-creationist.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Shedding Light on Brain Research: A Scientist Responds to Whitaker</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/czsLX1PtFns/shedding-light-on-brain-research.html</link><category>brain research</category><category>Elizabeth Thomas</category><category>Robert Whitaker</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:37:59 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-4499123669039924841</guid><description>Last week, I wrote a piece highly critical of a post Robert Whitaker published on his blog, Mad in America. His post attacked a very recent Scripps Institute study, which became the basis of his own editorializing on the research agenda of the NIMH, namely that “decades of such brain research has not produced any notable therapeutic payoff.”

My post noted that Whitaker had a point concerning one&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/czsLX1PtFns" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-10T10:37:59.659-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VeBK3oGzx9k/TzViLrW7mwI/AAAAAAAACL4/-JpYVgDcTCU/s72-c/imgres-1.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/shedding-light-on-brain-research.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Cortical Factor: What Is Going On In Our Brains With Gay Marriage and All That?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/x9RoIXfTvRs/cortical-factor-what-is-going-on-in-our.html</link><category>moral outrage</category><category>cortex</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>Robert Sapolsky</category><category>gay marriage</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:41:03 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-3309722861290990843</guid><description>Picking up from where we left off:

According to Robert Sapolsky of Stanford, the amygdala and the frontal cortex essentially regulate each other. The projections from the frontal cortex are inhibitory, as are the projections from the amygdala. In Sapolsky's words: “The frontal cortex is trying to get the amygdala to restrain itself. The amygdala is trying to get the frontal cortex to stop&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/x9RoIXfTvRs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-08T13:41:03.510-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XEvtwbFptAY/TzLcMnggfmI/AAAAAAAACLw/AdQLSinQ9E4/s72-c/imgres.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/cortical-factor-what-is-going-on-in-our.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Cortical Factor: Developing the Optimum Brain</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/wrttspFge4k/cortical-factor-developing-optimum.html</link><category>cortex</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>Robert Sapolsky</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:17 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-704190156017076319</guid><description>Take the teen-age brain - please! 

First, a quick review: In our previous post, Robert Sapolsky of Stanford (pictured here) explained how the frontal cortex is about doing the harder thing, if it is the right thing to do. Essentially, the more developed cortical areas modulate our more primitive limbic impulses, including learned (and virtually automatic) behaviors that are no longer stored in&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/wrttspFge4k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-07T16:23:17.425-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6nWx83EjHDI/TzG8mBj50UI/AAAAAAAACLo/9Y08vFdMFYQ/s72-c/screen-capture.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/cortical-factor-developing-optimum.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Cortical Factor</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/JGrFr70wB6Y/cortical-factor.html</link><category>human behavior</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>anterior cingulate cortex</category><category>Robert Sapolsky</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:35:33 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-8028519247832755350</guid><description>I just finished viewing Lecture 18 in a 25-part video series by Robert Sapolsky of Stanford. Dr Sapolsky is to human behavior what Carl Sagan was to astronomy. There is no one better at explaining the topic to the general public than this man. It’s not even close. I first stumbled into Sapolsky in early 2003 and I’ve been something of a groupie ever since.  

The video series I am watching is an&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/JGrFr70wB6Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-07T10:35:33.619-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vC58DJxESF4/TzCeNOquHzI/AAAAAAAACLg/y3dmA7Awm-s/s72-c/File:Phineas_gage_-_1868_skull_diagram.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/cortical-factor.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Epigenetics and Mental Illness and You</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/QRahIY7W0oQ/epigenetics-and-mental-illness-and-you.html</link><category>epigenetics</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>bipolar disorder</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:19:49 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-4942436826116462764</guid><description>Two posts ago, I took Robert Whitaker to task for misreporting an NIMH-funded study in order to advance his own idiosyncratic agenda. Whitaker reported the study as a garden variety postmortem exam of brains of those with schizophrenia vs controls. The study, in fact, involved epigenetics, which Whitaker both failed to mention and displayed no knowledge of.

I first came across the field in late&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/QRahIY7W0oQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-01T19:19:49.920-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5rEh3M6aGqw/Tyn4izMlKvI/AAAAAAAACLQ/hxEbvv-m9HU/s72-c/350px-Chromatin_lg.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">20</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/epigenetics-and-mental-illness-and-you.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Robert Whitaker: Dangerous in America - Part II</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/G6Ybrg5XYi4/robert-whitaker-dangerous-in-america.html</link><category>Dangerous in America</category><category>Robert Whitaker</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:26:18 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1919323900901467568</guid><description>Yesterday, I reported on Robert Whitaker’s dangerous tendency to play fast and loose with the facts in support of his own agenda. This worked in his 2010 book, “Anatomy of an Epidemic,” which I was largely supportive of despite my strong reservations over the way he misrepresented the studies he relied upon to make his point, not to mention his unpardonable cheap shots fueled by his profound&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/G6Ybrg5XYi4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-01T12:26:18.519-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zPOwx6Mtj_E/Tr7ztswTTXI/AAAAAAAACEU/ekD4boGwYMk/s72-c/bobwhitaker.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">15</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/02/robert-whitaker-dangerous-in-america.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Robert Whitaker: Dangerous in America</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/GdGsXzrjHFQ/robert-whitaker-dangerous-in-america.html</link><category>International Congress on Schizophrenia Research</category><category>Robert Whitaker</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:43:40 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-8315299083099772991</guid><description>On his Mad in America blog, in a Jan 12 post Rethinking Brain Research in Psychiatry, Robert Whitaker, author of "Anatomy of an Epidemic," made the very legitimate point that brain studies on those with mental illness fail to account for the effects of exposure to psychiatric drugs.

Agreed. So, if you slice and dice the brains of deceased individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar and compare&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/GdGsXzrjHFQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-31T13:43:40.646-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zPOwx6Mtj_E/Tr7ztswTTXI/AAAAAAAACEU/ekD4boGwYMk/s72-c/bobwhitaker.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/robert-whitaker-dangerous-in-america.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Rerun: Mahler: The Man Who Saw It Coming</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/0wFNo60lass/rerun-mahler-man-who-saw-it-coming.html</link><category>Gustav Mahler</category><category>cyclothymia</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>bipolar</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:16:09 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-6258901786424693261</guid><description>I just got in the door from a weekend trip to LA. There, I experienced the ultimate musical performance of my life - Dudamel conducting Mahler Symphony 6. The following is from a mcmanweb article I wrote in 2004, which I posted in edited form as a blog in June 2011. Enjoy ...

Gustav Mahler described himself as three times homeless, a Bohemian   in Austria, an Austrian among Germans, and a Jew&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/0wFNo60lass" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-29T22:16:09.669-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-54efNjMu_k0/TgtdWHPU1fI/AAAAAAAAB9g/1qYsBVAKpIY/s72-c/mahler2.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/rerun-mahler-man-who-saw-it-coming.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Book of Fort: The Two Wise Old Fools</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/SE-hucc6srY/book-of-fort-two-wise-old-fools.html</link><category>Book of Fort</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:48:02 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-8459224897577036645</guid><description>Book II in the series ...

At the watering hole, along the barrens of Fey, on the fork of the road leading to Mem in one direction and Ar in the other, the wise and righteous Fort encountered a weary stranger in threadbare garments. And although Fort would later go hungry, he offered the stranger his last loaf, which the man eagerly consumed.

Fort bid the stranger to make himself comfortable,&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/SE-hucc6srY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T18:48:02.541-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F9Uw0Fhwzyw/TyC7xeXrHZI/AAAAAAAACLA/pU-ifS9Yjy0/s72-c/354393.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/book-of-fort-two-wise-old-fools.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Newt the Borderpath: Making the Case that Psychiatry is Not Allowed to Make</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/HbLZHyWWg9o/newt-borderpath-making-case-that.html</link><category>Newt Gingrich</category><category>borderpath</category><category>Barbara Oakley</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:42:59 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-3316797897513884053</guid><description>Picking up where we left off ...

Thanks to “the Goldwater Rule” embedded into the code of ethics of the American Psychiatric Association, it is unethical for psychiatrists to “offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.”

The rule was the direct outcome of more than a thousand psychiatrists venturing&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/HbLZHyWWg9o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-24T19:42:59.372-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--f6z6ia_lAA/Tx9UFoCjrnI/AAAAAAAACK4/ghlNXc7M63g/s72-c/newt-gingrich-baby.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/newt-borderpath-making-case-that.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Challenging the Bipolar-Sex Conventional Wisdom</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/p-7Bfe9LUuo/challenging-bipolar-sex-conventional.html</link><category>sex</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>bipolar disorder</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:50:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-5996811776229776933</guid><description>I just added a new article to mcmanweb, The Whole Bipolar Sex Thing, which had its genesis in a series of posts on HealthCentral. Following is an extract ...

The conventional wisdom is that (hypo)mania increases our sexual drive - often to the point of excess - while depression has the opposite effect. Goodwin and Jamison in their 2007 "Manic-Depressive Illness" note that Aretaeus of Cappadocia&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/p-7Bfe9LUuo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-24T12:50:00.843-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QMcsoS8v6pg/Tx8W_ao2BLI/AAAAAAAACKw/X2HY0BYVRyw/s72-c/4643979496_7609a421e3_z.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/challenging-bipolar-sex-conventional.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Newt and "The Goldwater Rule": Why Psychiatrists Will Not Tell You the Obvious</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/lb9MzoGwRIQ/newt-gingrichs-three-marriages-mean-he.html</link><category>Newt Gingrich</category><category>The Goldwater Rule</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:43:12 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1142968235077333081</guid><description>“Newt Gingrich’s three marriages mean he might make a strong president - really,” ran the headline to a Fox News article published last Friday. What else would you expect from the publicity arm of the Republican Party? The twist was the article was written by a psychiatrist, not just any psychiatrist, a psychiatrist employed by Fox News, Fox News’ house psychiatrist Keith Ablow. Dr Ablow also&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/lb9MzoGwRIQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-23T14:43:12.731-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DKnIvUKF0k8/Tx29amnJtmI/AAAAAAAACKo/rdIPQ34vzkQ/s72-c/Fox+News+-+Fair+%2526+Balanced.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/newt-gingrichs-three-marriages-mean-he.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Book of Fort</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/MlnnYISaPAw/book-of-fort.html</link><category>Book of Fort</category><category>John McManamy</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:38:21 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1479495072054244374</guid><description>The other day, while hiking in the mountains, I came across some ancient writings secreted in a cave. Clearly, they are Scripture from a forgotten people. I just finished translating the first scroll ...

And there lived in the land of Gob a righteous man named Fort, who was a crafter of fine hardwood didgeridoos. And his didgeridoos were strong and resonant and affordable and brought great joy&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/MlnnYISaPAw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-20T20:38:21.008-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DUQz2IUv1Cs/TxnRfpu-tNI/AAAAAAAACKY/XQKp8-YCtec/s72-c/michelangelo-buonarroti-jeremiah-detail.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/book-of-fort.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Incompetence in Psychiatry: Readers Weigh In</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/idYCWgm4OEg/incompetence-in-psychiatry-readers.html</link><category>John McManamy</category><category>psychiatric incompetence</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:11:01 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-2855854306978504876</guid><description>“What percentage of psychiatrists do you think are incompetent?” I asked in a reader poll that ran some six weeks during December and January. Framing my question negatively carries the strong risk of encouraging rotten tomatoes responses and thus undermining the credibility of any findings, but my attempts at positive construction came out totally pathetic. Sometimes negative is the best option.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/idYCWgm4OEg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-19T01:11:01.963-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7GYGnaLb2GQ/TxdCtqbiTQI/AAAAAAAACKQ/73dtT1Sn4gc/s72-c/ThreeStooges.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">13</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/incompetence-in-psychiatry-readers.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Rerun: We Still Have a Dream</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~3/HljMUqdhMrE/rerun-we-still-have-dream.html</link><category>mountain</category><category>Martin Luther King</category><category>John McManamy</category><category>dream</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (John McManamy)</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:52:52 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1098361547792425611.post-1295241395979398780</guid><description>Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place. But I'm not concerned about that now. I just want to do God's will. And He's allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I've looked over. And I've seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the promised land!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/KnowledgeIsNecessity/~4/HljMUqdhMrE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-16T12:52:52.116-08:00</app:edited><media:thumbnail url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iL75wcGkroE/S1PavFFTnHI/AAAAAAAABNE/Jli77cVKlaU/s72-c/mlkmountaintop3.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://knowledgeisnecessity.blogspot.com/2012/01/rerun-we-still-have-dream.html</feedburner:origLink></item><media:credit role="author">John McManamy</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating><media:description type="plain">Musings on Mental Health</media:description></channel></rss>

