<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><!-- generator="podbean/5.5" --><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
    <title>KEI Live</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feed.podbean.com/keia/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/KoreanKontext</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>KEI Live is the official podcast feed for the Korea Economic Institute of America’s live panels and events. Hear panels and discussions covering Korean policy, economics, culture, and more, directly from our public events.<br /><br />[KEI is registered under FARA on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:16:32 -0400</pubDate>
    <generator>https://podbean.com/?v=5.5</generator>
    <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010 Korea Economic Institute</copyright>
    <category>News:Politics</category>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
          <itunes:summary>Korean Kontext is a newly launched initiative by the Korea Economic Institute in Washington, D.C. Its aim is to provide listeners with a source for broad-based, substantive information about the U.S.-Korean relationship from all angles: political, cultural, economic, and social. Tackling major topics using current and historical context, interviews with prominent policy leaders, scholars,and artists, and in-depth analysis, Korean Kontext is crafted to inform the newcomer and the Korea guru alike. </itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
	

    
    	<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="http://keia.podbean.com/mf/web/ssdt7/KoreanKontextLogocopy.jpg"/>
    
    <itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>A behind-the-scenes conversation with the scholars, artists, and opinion-makers who bridge our two worlds.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics"/><itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/><itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film"/><itunes:category text="Technology"/><itunes:owner><itunes:email>podcast@keia.org</itunes:email><itunes:name>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:name></itunes:owner><item>
        <title>18th Annual 727 Korean War Veterans Armistice Day Commemoration</title>
        <itunes:title>18th Annual 727 Korean War Veterans Armistice Day Commemoration</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/18th-annual-727-korean-war-veterans-armistice-day-commemoration/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/18th-annual-727-korean-war-veterans-armistice-day-commemoration/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:16:32 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/8615f2da-76c6-3c73-9481-a8656a70d099</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
Join us for the 18th Annual 727 Korean War Veterans Armistice Day Commemoration to mark the signing of the Korean War ceasefire agreement on July 27, 1953, as we honor the enduring legacy of Korean War veterans and stand together in support of peace on the Korean Peninsula.
 
Held in the historic Cannon Caucus Room on Capitol Hill, this event features remarks from Members of Congress and veterans; Korean traditional performances; and a candlelighting ceremony at 7:27 PM—a powerful moment symbolizing remembrance and hope.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
Join us for the 18th Annual 727 Korean War Veterans Armistice Day Commemoration to mark the signing of the Korean War ceasefire agreement on July 27, 1953, as we honor the enduring legacy of Korean War veterans and stand together in support of peace on the Korean Peninsula.
 
Held in the historic Cannon Caucus Room on Capitol Hill, this event features remarks from Members of Congress and veterans; Korean traditional performances; and a candlelighting ceremony at 7:27 PM—a powerful moment symbolizing remembrance and hope.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="117770405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/sd47gyyb7d744ghy/727_202574pwt.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
Join us for the 18th Annual 727 Korean War Veterans Armistice Day Commemoration to mark the signing of the Korean War ceasefire agreement on July 27, 1953, as we honor the enduring legacy of Korean War veterans and stand together in support of peace on the Korean Peninsula.
 
Held in the historic Cannon Caucus Room on Capitol Hill, this event features remarks from Members of Congress and veterans; Korean traditional performances; and a candlelighting ceremony at 7:27 PM—a powerful moment symbolizing remembrance and hope.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4906</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   Join us for the 18th Annual 727 Korean War Veterans Armistice Day Commemoration to mark the signing of the Korean War ceasefire agreement on July 27, 1953, as we honor the enduring legacy of Korean War veterans and stand together in support of peace on the Korean Peninsula.   Held in the historic Cannon Caucus Room on Capitol Hill, this event features remarks from Members of Congress and veterans; Korean traditional performances; and a candlelighting ceremony at 7:27 PM—a powerful moment symbolizing remembrance and hope.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>South Korea’s New President and Prospects for U.S.-Korea Relations: A View from Former Ambassadors</title>
        <itunes:title>South Korea’s New President and Prospects for U.S.-Korea Relations: A View from Former Ambassadors</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-new-president-and-prospects-for-us-korea-relations-a-view-from-former-ambassadors/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-new-president-and-prospects-for-us-korea-relations-a-view-from-former-ambassadors/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:49:27 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/4e05f551-8648-3b70-93be-92d0dc3ad8ae</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
 
Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
 
Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="90796901" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/p694upgn96ba8tny/South_Koreas_New_President_and_Prospects_for_USKorea_Relations_A_View_from_Former_Ambassadors7y51t.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
 
Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3782</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.   Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>From Peaceful Unification to Two Koreas? Paradigm Shifts in Inter-Korean Relations</title>
        <itunes:title>From Peaceful Unification to Two Koreas? Paradigm Shifts in Inter-Korean Relations</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/from-peaceful-unification-to-two-koreas-paradigm-shifts-in-inter-korean-relations/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/from-peaceful-unification-to-two-koreas-paradigm-shifts-in-inter-korean-relations/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:37:43 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/f96f3811-3d4c-394f-9978-99a945036088</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="85380773" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/wj74a8ca4z45xi85/peaceful_unificationbsfmk.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3557</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>220</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>The Globalization of K-Culture</title>
        <itunes:title>The Globalization of K-Culture</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-globalization-of-k-culture/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-globalization-of-k-culture/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:12:15 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/358e566f-79ce-3fd6-9ed0-355d2d403923</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="94368101" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/2r3u28kmp2x8x4cr/Globalization_of_K_Culture8cq5u.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3931</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea</title>
        <itunes:title>Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/beyond-the-demographic-cliff-economic-adaptation-in-hyper-aged-korea/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/beyond-the-demographic-cliff-economic-adaptation-in-hyper-aged-korea/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/24285d6a-bc33-33c5-b6e1-9cbbfe5c7886</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.
 
KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.
 
By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.
 
Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.
 
KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.
 
By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.
 
Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="84217253" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/2pt9757v3dpftdbj/Beyond_the_Demographic_Cliff_Economic_Adaptation_in_Hyper_Aged_Korea632ad.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.
 
KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.
 
By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.
 
Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3508</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>218</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.   KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.   By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.   Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Unpacking South Korea’s 2025 Presidential Election</title>
        <itunes:title>Unpacking South Korea’s 2025 Presidential Election</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/unpacking-south-korea-s-2025-presidential-election/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/unpacking-south-korea-s-2025-presidential-election/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 17:43:26 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/9350e8f1-f510-3284-a480-84f3830ac51b</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
 
KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
 
KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="89053292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/tn2hzar685k7knui/Unpacking_South_Korea_s_2025_Presidential_Election6ipgt.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
 
KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3710</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.   KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context</title>
        <itunes:title>South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-geoeconomic-strategy-industrial-policy-in-comparative-context/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-geoeconomic-strategy-industrial-policy-in-comparative-context/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 16:57:12 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/a0caf189-d3cc-3679-978b-931cdf5de242</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.
 
Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.
 
Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="85037663" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/rnx9wh8x4hwznees/South_Koreas_Geoeconomic_Strategy_Industrial_Policy_in_Comparative_Context881yf.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.
 
Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3542</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>216</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.   Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Managing US-South Korea Relations under the Shadow of Impeachment</title>
        <itunes:title>Managing US-South Korea Relations under the Shadow of Impeachment</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/managing-us-south-korea-relations-under-the-shadow-of-impeachment/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/managing-us-south-korea-relations-under-the-shadow-of-impeachment/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 16:42:23 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/6b09fb46-c7f3-3128-8d1a-cfe91eb1b5ab</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?
 
Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?
 
Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="82207775" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/9t68v6vthi74sde9/Managing_US-South_Korea_Relations_under_the_Shadow_of_Impeachmentb7ayn.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 


 
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?
 
Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3424</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>215</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]   South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?   Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region</title>
        <itunes:title>Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/recalibration-in-the-indo-pacific-perspectives-from-the-region/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/recalibration-in-the-indo-pacific-perspectives-from-the-region/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:26:31 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/9782e914-dcad-39dc-98d6-3a91815cd2da</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order?</p>
<p>Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order?</p>
<p>Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="200963406" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/4jkrpxg8t8gx5xy2/RECAL.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order?
Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>8372</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>214</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order? Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>All Hands on Deck: Korea's Strategic Role in Revitalizing U.S. Shipbuilding</title>
        <itunes:title>All Hands on Deck: Korea's Strategic Role in Revitalizing U.S. Shipbuilding</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/all-hands-on-deck-koreas-strategic-role-in-revitalizing-us-shipbuilding/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/all-hands-on-deck-koreas-strategic-role-in-revitalizing-us-shipbuilding/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 13:15:32 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/1f7abd10-320a-3d25-a507-0a5c9b0a414f</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow.</p>
<p>Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow.</p>
<p>Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="106568208" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/secs8mh7bnrtbgdm/all_hands_on_deck_podacytr.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow.
Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4439</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>213</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow. Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict</title>
        <itunes:title>Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siloed-no-more-the-us-rok-alliance-and-a-taiwan-conflict/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siloed-no-more-the-us-rok-alliance-and-a-taiwan-conflict/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:50:02 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/35dbf835-3b10-3ee5-b61a-ac9c7f253f15</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan.</p>
<p>KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.</p>
<p>Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective.</p>
<p>Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency.</p>
<p>KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan.</p>
<p>KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.</p>
<p>Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective.</p>
<p>Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency.</p>
<p>KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="86308904" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ikz3y4srguvqycue/Siloed_No_More_PODbdgc0.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan.
KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective.
Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency.
KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3595</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>212</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan. KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective. Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency. KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>What Are Current American Attitudes Toward the Korean Peninsula?</title>
        <itunes:title>What Are Current American Attitudes Toward the Korean Peninsula?</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/keififthannualsurveydiscussion/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/keififthannualsurveydiscussion/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:04:55 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/56c0e2a1-bb62-3d5e-940b-c5db7144a0e7</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: <a href='https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share'>https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share</a> .</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: <a href='https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share'>https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="40027352" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/vi9a5hus5nxrw7pa/edit_mixdown.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.
 
This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share .]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>1667</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.   This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share .</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>NATO and the Indo-Pacific Partners</title>
        <itunes:title>NATO and the Indo-Pacific Partners</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/nato-and-the-indo-pacific-partners/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/nato-and-the-indo-pacific-partners/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/b0a3c293-a887-330e-9a90-ef049136236d</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="129368212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/gxi2tpup3babja4w/NATO_POD91xjy.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5389</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>210</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>What are Domestic Politics Doing to the U.S.-Korea Alliance?</title>
        <itunes:title>What are Domestic Politics Doing to the U.S.-Korea Alliance?</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/what-are-domestic-politics-doing-to-the-us-korea-alliance/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/what-are-domestic-politics-doing-to-the-us-korea-alliance/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/dcc31118-e55e-31f1-9256-198f59dfcd4d</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In April 2023, the United States and South Korea marked the 70th anniversary of an alliance that has served the strategic interests of both countries. Their relationship has expanded beyond security issues to include trade, technology, and other important policy areas. However, the alliance now faces challenges from changing notions of national interests and political polarization in both countries.</p>
<p>On January 16, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion with Scott Snyder, author of The U.S.-Korea Alliance: Why It May Fail and Why It Must Not, on what domestic political developments in both countries mean for the future of the U.S.-Korea alliance.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In April 2023, the United States and South Korea marked the 70th anniversary of an alliance that has served the strategic interests of both countries. Their relationship has expanded beyond security issues to include trade, technology, and other important policy areas. However, the alliance now faces challenges from changing notions of national interests and political polarization in both countries.</p>
<p>On January 16, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion with Scott Snyder, author of The U.S.-Korea Alliance: Why It May Fail and Why It Must Not, on what domestic political developments in both countries mean for the future of the U.S.-Korea alliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="87866371" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/gkurp4/recentpod.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In April 2023, the United States and South Korea marked the 70th anniversary of an alliance that has served the strategic interests of both countries. Their relationship has expanded beyond security issues to include trade, technology, and other important policy areas. However, the alliance now faces challenges from changing notions of national interests and political polarization in both countries.
On January 16, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion with Scott Snyder, author of The U.S.-Korea Alliance: Why It May Fail and Why It Must Not, on what domestic political developments in both countries mean for the future of the U.S.-Korea alliance.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3660</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>In April 2023, the United States and South Korea marked the 70th anniversary of an alliance that has served the strategic interests of both countries. Their relationship has expanded beyond security issues to include trade, technology, and other important policy areas. However, the alliance now faces challenges from changing notions of national interests and political polarization in both countries. On January 16, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion with Scott Snyder, author of The U.S.-Korea Alliance: Why It May Fail and Why It Must Not, on what domestic political developments in both countries mean for the future of the U.S.-Korea alliance.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Charting China’s Use of Armed Coercion: James Siebens (Part 2)</title>
        <itunes:title>Charting China’s Use of Armed Coercion: James Siebens (Part 2)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siebens_2/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siebens_2/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/8756a90a-fb69-3104-8274-3b2d942d74ca</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it.</p>
<p>James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War (Routledge 2020), a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting (Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion.</p>
<p>The second part of our conversation focuses on the application of his analysis to the Korean Peninsula – both historically and in a more contemporary context – and James’ thoughts on what the United States has gotten right and wrong on China and some related policy recommendations.</p>
<p> </p>
The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found <a href='https://www.routledge.com/Chinas-Use-of-Armed-Coercion-To-Win-Without-Fighting/Siebens/p/book/9781032481838'>here</a>.
A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found <a href='https://www.stimson.org/2023/keep-calm-and-carry-on-chinas-armed-coercion-isnt-working/'>here</a>.]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it.</p>
<p>James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, <em>Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War </em>(Routledge 2020)<em>, </em>a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of <em>China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting </em>(Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion.</p>
<p>The second part of our conversation focuses on the application of his analysis to the Korean Peninsula – both historically and in a more contemporary context – and James’ thoughts on what the United States has gotten right and wrong on China and some related policy recommendations.</p>
<p> </p>
The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found <a href='https://www.routledge.com/Chinas-Use-of-Armed-Coercion-To-Win-Without-Fighting/Siebens/p/book/9781032481838'>here</a>.
A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found <a href='https://www.stimson.org/2023/keep-calm-and-carry-on-chinas-armed-coercion-isnt-working/'>here</a>.]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="58739963" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ybcw3q/siebenspod2.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it.
James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War (Routledge 2020), a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting (Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion.
The second part of our conversation focuses on the application of his analysis to the Korean Peninsula – both historically and in a more contemporary context – and James’ thoughts on what the United States has gotten right and wrong on China and some related policy recommendations.
 
The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found here.
A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found here.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>2447</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it. James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War (Routledge 2020), a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting (Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion. The second part of our conversation focuses on the application of his analysis to the Korean Peninsula – both historically and in a more contemporary context – and James’ thoughts on what the United States has gotten right and wrong on China and some related policy recommendations.   The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found here. A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found here.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Charting China’s Use of Armed Coercion: James Siebens (Part 1)</title>
        <itunes:title>Charting China’s Use of Armed Coercion: James Siebens (Part 1)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siebens_1/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siebens_1/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:52:54 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/696da147-f357-3392-a4a6-c1fdd1e04e8c</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it.</p>
<p>James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War (Routledge 2020), a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting (Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion.</p>
<p>Our conversation is split into two parts, the first of which focuses on: the motivation behind his latest book project and what sets it apart from other work on China; key terms and concepts used throughout the book, such as coercion, deterrence and compellence; and the overall content and structure of the book as well as some of the representative examples of China’s use of armed coercion and whether they were effective.</p>
<p> </p>
The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found <a href='https://www.routledge.com/Chinas-Use-of-Armed-Coercion-To-Win-Without-Fighting/Siebens/p/book/9781032481838'>here</a>.
A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found <a href='https://www.stimson.org/2023/keep-calm-and-carry-on-chinas-armed-coercion-isnt-working/'>here</a>.]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it.</p>
<p>James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, <em>Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War </em>(Routledge 2020)<em>, </em>a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of <em>China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting </em>(Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion.</p>
<p>Our conversation is split into two parts, the first of which focuses on: the motivation behind his latest book project and what sets it apart from other work on China; key terms and concepts used throughout the book, such as coercion, deterrence and compellence; and the overall content and structure of the book as well as some of the representative examples of China’s use of armed coercion and whether they were effective.</p>
<p> </p>
The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found <a href='https://www.routledge.com/Chinas-Use-of-Armed-Coercion-To-Win-Without-Fighting/Siebens/p/book/9781032481838'>here</a>.
A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found <a href='https://www.stimson.org/2023/keep-calm-and-carry-on-chinas-armed-coercion-isnt-working/'>here</a>.]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="65728081" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/zitr33/siebenspod_1.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it.
James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War (Routledge 2020), a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting (Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion.
Our conversation is split into two parts, the first of which focuses on: the motivation behind his latest book project and what sets it apart from other work on China; key terms and concepts used throughout the book, such as coercion, deterrence and compellence; and the overall content and structure of the book as well as some of the representative examples of China’s use of armed coercion and whether they were effective.
 
The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found here.
A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found here.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>2738</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Building on last year’s "Rethinking Korea initiative," in 2024 KEI will continue to explore the evolution of US-Korea relations, Korea's place in the world, rapid changes in Korean society, and a fast changing geopolitical and strategic landscape. The initiative involves both retrospective inquiry as well as prospective analysis about future trends. Our guest today is intently focused on the role of armed coercion as a tool of foreign policy employed by both the United States and China and how other states perceive and respond to it. James A. Siebens is a Fellow with Stimson Center’s Reimagining US Grand Strategy program, where he leads the Defense Strategy and Planning project. His research focuses on grand strategy, military coercion, and gray zone conflict. Building on a co-edited volume titled, Military Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War (Routledge 2020), a book on U.S. strategy and military operations since the end of the Cold War, James is also the editor of China’s Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting (Routledge 2023), a recently published study on China’s use of military and paramilitary forces for purposes of coercion. Our conversation is split into two parts, the first of which focuses on: the motivation behind his latest book project and what sets it apart from other work on China; key terms and concepts used throughout the book, such as coercion, deterrence and compellence; and the overall content and structure of the book as well as some of the representative examples of China’s use of armed coercion and whether they were effective.   The book, "China's Use of Armed Coercion: To Win Without Fighting," can be found here. A shorter piece by James A. Siebens examining the effectiveness of China's use of armed coercion may be found here.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Where are North Korea's Relations with Russia Headed?</title>
        <itunes:title>Where are North Korea's Relations with Russia Headed?</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/2_8_24/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/2_8_24/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/6ad68eb4-15cf-3d55-965b-20050c571dc3</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time since the end of the Cold War, North Korea has embraced relations with Russia as a key component of its foreign policy and domestic development. However, Russia’s need for North Korean artillery and weapons to conduct its war in Ukraine also create a different dynamic between the two countries than during the Cold War. This new dynamic and the unknown outcome of the war in Ukraine raise questions about the long-term viability of deepening ties between North Korea and Russia, as well as Pyongyang’s choice to deepen relations with Moscow and to a lesser extent Beijing, rather than seeking to improve relations with Washington and Seoul.</p>
<p>On February 8, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion on these and other issues related to the growing relationship between North Korea and Russia with long-time North Korea expert Dr. Andrei Lankov of Kookmin University.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time since the end of the Cold War, North Korea has embraced relations with Russia as a key component of its foreign policy and domestic development. However, Russia’s need for North Korean artillery and weapons to conduct its war in Ukraine also create a different dynamic between the two countries than during the Cold War. This new dynamic and the unknown outcome of the war in Ukraine raise questions about the long-term viability of deepening ties between North Korea and Russia, as well as Pyongyang’s choice to deepen relations with Moscow and to a lesser extent Beijing, rather than seeking to improve relations with Washington and Seoul.</p>
<p>On February 8, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion on these and other issues related to the growing relationship between North Korea and Russia with long-time North Korea expert Dr. Andrei Lankov of Kookmin University.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="82490623" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/rndywb/Lankov_Podcastbobxq.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[For the first time since the end of the Cold War, North Korea has embraced relations with Russia as a key component of its foreign policy and domestic development. However, Russia’s need for North Korean artillery and weapons to conduct its war in Ukraine also create a different dynamic between the two countries than during the Cold War. This new dynamic and the unknown outcome of the war in Ukraine raise questions about the long-term viability of deepening ties between North Korea and Russia, as well as Pyongyang’s choice to deepen relations with Moscow and to a lesser extent Beijing, rather than seeking to improve relations with Washington and Seoul.
On February 8, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion on these and other issues related to the growing relationship between North Korea and Russia with long-time North Korea expert Dr. Andrei Lankov of Kookmin University.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3435</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>For the first time since the end of the Cold War, North Korea has embraced relations with Russia as a key component of its foreign policy and domestic development. However, Russia’s need for North Korean artillery and weapons to conduct its war in Ukraine also create a different dynamic between the two countries than during the Cold War. This new dynamic and the unknown outcome of the war in Ukraine raise questions about the long-term viability of deepening ties between North Korea and Russia, as well as Pyongyang’s choice to deepen relations with Moscow and to a lesser extent Beijing, rather than seeking to improve relations with Washington and Seoul. On February 8, 2024, KEI hosted a discussion on these and other issues related to the growing relationship between North Korea and Russia with long-time North Korea expert Dr. Andrei Lankov of Kookmin University.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>The U.S.-ROK-DPRK Strategic Triangle in the Indo-Pacific Era</title>
        <itunes:title>The U.S.-ROK-DPRK Strategic Triangle in the Indo-Pacific Era</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-us-rok-dprk-strategic-triangle-in-the-indo-pacific-era/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-us-rok-dprk-strategic-triangle-in-the-indo-pacific-era/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/1200bd9e-0dc3-3c52-95ba-4f603bee4d90</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>On August 17, 2023, KEI held a program on the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea Strategic Triangle in the Indo-Pacific Era. The program featured Scott Snyder’s work to help better understand: the evolution in perceptions of the three main actors in the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangle, including their respective approaches to one another and interactions with China; the main impacts of U.S.-China rivalry on their respective postures and priorities; and the future trajectory of both U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangular relations and great power relations in the region.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 17, 2023, KEI held a program on the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea Strategic Triangle in the Indo-Pacific Era. The program featured Scott Snyder’s work to help better understand: the evolution in perceptions of the three main actors in the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangle, including their respective approaches to one another and interactions with China; the main impacts of U.S.-China rivalry on their respective postures and priorities; and the future trajectory of both U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangular relations and great power relations in the region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="86523973" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/8wgs8i/usrokdprkpod.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 17, 2023, KEI held a program on the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea Strategic Triangle in the Indo-Pacific Era. The program featured Scott Snyder’s work to help better understand: the evolution in perceptions of the three main actors in the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangle, including their respective approaches to one another and interactions with China; the main impacts of U.S.-China rivalry on their respective postures and priorities; and the future trajectory of both U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangular relations and great power relations in the region.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3604</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>205</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>On August 17, 2023, KEI held a program on the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea Strategic Triangle in the Indo-Pacific Era. The program featured Scott Snyder’s work to help better understand: the evolution in perceptions of the three main actors in the U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangle, including their respective approaches to one another and interactions with China; the main impacts of U.S.-China rivalry on their respective postures and priorities; and the future trajectory of both U.S.-South Korea-North Korea triangular relations and great power relations in the region.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>How Can Korea and Australia Cooperate in the Indo-Pacific?</title>
        <itunes:title>How Can Korea and Australia Cooperate in the Indo-Pacific?</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/how-can-korea-and-australia-cooperate-in-the-indo-pacific/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/how-can-korea-and-australia-cooperate-in-the-indo-pacific/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/beeaf164-d1d0-370f-86aa-6e638908b59e</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>On August 30, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion with Prof. Rory Medcalf on South Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Middle Power Convergence with Australia. Over the past decade, the concept of the “Indo-Pacific” has replaced the late 20th century “Asia-Pacific” as a central frame of reference for strategy and external policy. Although the Indo-Pacific is often associated particularly with Japan and its influential prime minister the late Abe Shinzo, in fact, Australia was the first country to formally recognize the Indo-Pacific as its regional security environment. As a fellow middle power and independent-minded U.S. ally, with its own geopolitical complexities to navigate, Australia provides an illuminating example for South Korea as it operationalizes its Indo-Pacific strategy.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 30, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion with Prof. Rory Medcalf on South Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Middle Power Convergence with Australia. Over the past decade, the concept of the “Indo-Pacific” has replaced the late 20th century “Asia-Pacific” as a central frame of reference for strategy and external policy. Although the Indo-Pacific is often associated particularly with Japan and its influential prime minister the late Abe Shinzo, in fact, Australia was the first country to formally recognize the Indo-Pacific as its regional security environment. As a fellow middle power and independent-minded U.S. ally, with its own geopolitical complexities to navigate, Australia provides an illuminating example for South Korea as it operationalizes its Indo-Pacific strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="87293681" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/egcrtp/australiapod.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 30, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion with Prof. Rory Medcalf on South Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Middle Power Convergence with Australia. Over the past decade, the concept of the “Indo-Pacific” has replaced the late 20th century “Asia-Pacific” as a central frame of reference for strategy and external policy. Although the Indo-Pacific is often associated particularly with Japan and its influential prime minister the late Abe Shinzo, in fact, Australia was the first country to formally recognize the Indo-Pacific as its regional security environment. As a fellow middle power and independent-minded U.S. ally, with its own geopolitical complexities to navigate, Australia provides an illuminating example for South Korea as it operationalizes its Indo-Pacific strategy.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3636</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>204</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>On August 30, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion with Prof. Rory Medcalf on South Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Middle Power Convergence with Australia. Over the past decade, the concept of the “Indo-Pacific” has replaced the late 20th century “Asia-Pacific” as a central frame of reference for strategy and external policy. Although the Indo-Pacific is often associated particularly with Japan and its influential prime minister the late Abe Shinzo, in fact, Australia was the first country to formally recognize the Indo-Pacific as its regional security environment. As a fellow middle power and independent-minded U.S. ally, with its own geopolitical complexities to navigate, Australia provides an illuminating example for South Korea as it operationalizes its Indo-Pacific strategy.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Energy Insecurity: How Resource-Poor Korea and Japan Powered Their Economies</title>
        <itunes:title>Energy Insecurity: How Resource-Poor Korea and Japan Powered Their Economies</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/energy-insecurity-how-resource-poor-korea-and-japan-powered-their-economies/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/energy-insecurity-how-resource-poor-korea-and-japan-powered-their-economies/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/29fbe542-82a2-3d1d-af29-9b372fb7f97c</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite being industrial powerhouses, Korea and Japan are both resource-poor nations with limited domestic sources of energy. Powering their economies required both to develop supply chains for fossil fuels, nuclear power, and renewable energy to power their economies. However, different domestic political constraints resulted in differing approaches to achieving energy security.</p>
<p>On September 21, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion on Korea and Japan’s efforts to achieve energy security with Dr. Seong-ik Oh who discussed his new book, Overseas Energy Investment of Korea and Japan: How did Two East Asian Resources-Rare Industrial Giants Respond to Energy Security Challenges.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite being industrial powerhouses, Korea and Japan are both resource-poor nations with limited domestic sources of energy. Powering their economies required both to develop supply chains for fossil fuels, nuclear power, and renewable energy to power their economies. However, different domestic political constraints resulted in differing approaches to achieving energy security.</p>
<p>On September 21, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion on Korea and Japan’s efforts to achieve energy security with Dr. Seong-ik Oh who discussed his new book, Overseas Energy Investment of Korea and Japan: How did Two East Asian Resources-Rare Industrial Giants Respond to Energy Security Challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="82121459" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/vmvvzs/energypod.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Despite being industrial powerhouses, Korea and Japan are both resource-poor nations with limited domestic sources of energy. Powering their economies required both to develop supply chains for fossil fuels, nuclear power, and renewable energy to power their economies. However, different domestic political constraints resulted in differing approaches to achieving energy security.
On September 21, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion on Korea and Japan’s efforts to achieve energy security with Dr. Seong-ik Oh who discussed his new book, Overseas Energy Investment of Korea and Japan: How did Two East Asian Resources-Rare Industrial Giants Respond to Energy Security Challenges.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3420</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>203</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Despite being industrial powerhouses, Korea and Japan are both resource-poor nations with limited domestic sources of energy. Powering their economies required both to develop supply chains for fossil fuels, nuclear power, and renewable energy to power their economies. However, different domestic political constraints resulted in differing approaches to achieving energy security. On September 21, 2023, KEI hosted a discussion on Korea and Japan’s efforts to achieve energy security with Dr. Seong-ik Oh who discussed his new book, Overseas Energy Investment of Korea and Japan: How did Two East Asian Resources-Rare Industrial Giants Respond to Energy Security Challenges.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
</channel>
</rss>