<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><!-- generator="podbean/5.5" --><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss" version="2.0">

<channel>
    <title>KEI Live</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feed.podbean.com/keia/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/KoreanKontext</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>KEI Live is the official podcast feed for the Korea Economic Institute of America’s live panels and events. Hear panels and discussions covering Korean policy, economics, culture, and more, directly from our public events.<br /><br />[KEI is registered under FARA on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:35:35 -0400</pubDate>
    <generator>https://podbean.com/?v=5.5</generator>
    <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010 Korea Economic Institute</copyright>
    <category>News:Politics</category>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
          <itunes:summary>Korean Kontext is a newly launched initiative by the Korea Economic Institute in Washington, D.C. Its aim is to provide listeners with a source for broad-based, substantive information about the U.S.-Korean relationship from all angles: political, cultural, economic, and social. Tackling major topics using current and historical context, interviews with prominent policy leaders, scholars,and artists, and in-depth analysis, Korean Kontext is crafted to inform the newcomer and the Korea guru alike. </itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
	

    
    	<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="http://keia.podbean.com/mf/web/ssdt7/KoreanKontextLogocopy.jpg"/>
    
    <itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>A behind-the-scenes conversation with the scholars, artists, and opinion-makers who bridge our two worlds.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics"/><itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/><itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film"/><itunes:category text="Technology"/><itunes:owner><itunes:email>podcast@keia.org</itunes:email><itunes:name>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:name></itunes:owner><item>
        <title>The Lee Jae Myung Administration’s Regional Diplomacy with China and Japan</title>
        <itunes:title>The Lee Jae Myung Administration’s Regional Diplomacy with China and Japan</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-lee-jae-myung-administration-s-regional-diplomacy-with-china-and-japan/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-lee-jae-myung-administration-s-regional-diplomacy-with-china-and-japan/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:35:35 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/c37cb845-25c8-3a2c-9fcd-bd5da9a0ecce</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>South Korea’s Lee Jae Myung administration has embraced what it calls “national interest–driven pragmatic diplomacy.” While this approach embraces a strong U.S.–Korea alliance, it also raises key questions about Seoul’s evolving relationships with its regional neighbors, China and Japan.</p>
<p>Will the Lee government return to “strategic ambiguity” as a way to mend ties with the Xi Jinping government? What is the administration’s China policy, and how is it viewed from Beijing?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, South Korea–Japan relations have continued to improve, but the election of Sanae Takaichi raises some doubts about whether this momentum will be sustained.</p>
<p>Ms. Shihoko Goto, Vice President of Programs and Director of the Asia Program, Foreign Policy Research Institute, and Dr. Sungmin Cho, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Sungkyunkwan University, will tackle these and other questions on an exclusive panel moderated by Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Affairs.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Korea’s Lee Jae Myung administration has embraced what it calls “national interest–driven pragmatic diplomacy.” While this approach embraces a strong U.S.–Korea alliance, it also raises key questions about Seoul’s evolving relationships with its regional neighbors, China and Japan.</p>
<p>Will the Lee government return to “strategic ambiguity” as a way to mend ties with the Xi Jinping government? What is the administration’s China policy, and how is it viewed from Beijing?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, South Korea–Japan relations have continued to improve, but the election of Sanae Takaichi raises some doubts about whether this momentum will be sustained.</p>
<p>Ms. Shihoko Goto, Vice President of Programs and Director of the Asia Program, Foreign Policy Research Institute, and Dr. Sungmin Cho, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Sungkyunkwan University, will tackle these and other questions on an exclusive panel moderated by Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Affairs.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="85931919" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/9ktnvexjrbs894g8/lee_jae_myung6wbjr.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[South Korea’s Lee Jae Myung administration has embraced what it calls “national interest–driven pragmatic diplomacy.” While this approach embraces a strong U.S.–Korea alliance, it also raises key questions about Seoul’s evolving relationships with its regional neighbors, China and Japan.
Will the Lee government return to “strategic ambiguity” as a way to mend ties with the Xi Jinping government? What is the administration’s China policy, and how is it viewed from Beijing?
Meanwhile, South Korea–Japan relations have continued to improve, but the election of Sanae Takaichi raises some doubts about whether this momentum will be sustained.
Ms. Shihoko Goto, Vice President of Programs and Director of the Asia Program, Foreign Policy Research Institute, and Dr. Sungmin Cho, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Sungkyunkwan University, will tackle these and other questions on an exclusive panel moderated by Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Affairs.
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3580</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>229</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>South Korea’s Lee Jae Myung administration has embraced what it calls “national interest–driven pragmatic diplomacy.” While this approach embraces a strong U.S.–Korea alliance, it also raises key questions about Seoul’s evolving relationships with its regional neighbors, China and Japan. Will the Lee government return to “strategic ambiguity” as a way to mend ties with the Xi Jinping government? What is the administration’s China policy, and how is it viewed from Beijing? Meanwhile, South Korea–Japan relations have continued to improve, but the election of Sanae Takaichi raises some doubts about whether this momentum will be sustained. Ms. Shihoko Goto, Vice President of Programs and Director of the Asia Program, Foreign Policy Research Institute, and Dr. Sungmin Cho, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Sungkyunkwan University, will tackle these and other questions on an exclusive panel moderated by Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Affairs. [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>What to Expect from APEC 2025: Fostering Sustainable Prosperity in the Asia-Pacific Region</title>
        <itunes:title>What to Expect from APEC 2025: Fostering Sustainable Prosperity in the Asia-Pacific Region</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/what-to-expect-from-apec-2025-fostering-sustainable-prosperity-in-the-asia-pacific-region/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/what-to-expect-from-apec-2025-fostering-sustainable-prosperity-in-the-asia-pacific-region/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:30:05 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/ba337341-15ec-3d81-b8e0-60920b28b3bd</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>APEC 2025 will facilitate high-level dialogue between member nations, including major trading partners such as the United States, China, Korea, and Japan. This marks one of the first opportunities for multilateralism between leaders following new administrations entering APEC capitals across both Asia and North America. </p>
<p>What impact will this have on bilateral and regional trade and policy? How can APEC strengthen Asia-Pacific cooperation amidst the rapid development of emerging technologies? How has Korea helped progress toward these goals? </p>
<p>Join the Korea Economic Institute of America for an informed discussion co-hosted with the National Center for APEC on what to expect out of this year’s APEC forum and how it will shape relations across the Indo-Pacific.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APEC 2025 will facilitate high-level dialogue between member nations, including major trading partners such as the United States, China, Korea, and Japan. This marks one of the first opportunities for multilateralism between leaders following new administrations entering APEC capitals across both Asia and North America. </p>
<p>What impact will this have on bilateral and regional trade and policy? How can APEC strengthen Asia-Pacific cooperation amidst the rapid development of emerging technologies? How has Korea helped progress toward these goals? </p>
<p>Join the Korea Economic Institute of America for an informed discussion co-hosted with the National Center for APEC on what to expect out of this year’s APEC forum and how it will shape relations across the Indo-Pacific.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="116768655" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/xy7xyv87jx9cjgme/what_to_expect_from_APEC6uqdk.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[APEC 2025 will facilitate high-level dialogue between member nations, including major trading partners such as the United States, China, Korea, and Japan. This marks one of the first opportunities for multilateralism between leaders following new administrations entering APEC capitals across both Asia and North America. 
What impact will this have on bilateral and regional trade and policy? How can APEC strengthen Asia-Pacific cooperation amidst the rapid development of emerging technologies? How has Korea helped progress toward these goals? 
Join the Korea Economic Institute of America for an informed discussion co-hosted with the National Center for APEC on what to expect out of this year’s APEC forum and how it will shape relations across the Indo-Pacific.
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4864</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>228</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>APEC 2025 will facilitate high-level dialogue between member nations, including major trading partners such as the United States, China, Korea, and Japan. This marks one of the first opportunities for multilateralism between leaders following new administrations entering APEC capitals across both Asia and North America.  What impact will this have on bilateral and regional trade and policy? How can APEC strengthen Asia-Pacific cooperation amidst the rapid development of emerging technologies? How has Korea helped progress toward these goals?  Join the Korea Economic Institute of America for an informed discussion co-hosted with the National Center for APEC on what to expect out of this year’s APEC forum and how it will shape relations across the Indo-Pacific. [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Securing East Asia's Energy Future: Advancing U.S.-Korea-Japan Cooperation in Natural Gas</title>
        <itunes:title>Securing East Asia's Energy Future: Advancing U.S.-Korea-Japan Cooperation in Natural Gas</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/securing-east-asias-energy-future-advancing-us-korea-japan-cooperation-in-natural-gas/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/securing-east-asias-energy-future-advancing-us-korea-japan-cooperation-in-natural-gas/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:22:02 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/70c882ae-ccae-33ac-b889-5c50adc2cbc5</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States, South Korea, and Japan are enhancing their trilateral cooperation to secure natural gas supply chains in East Asia. Recent strategic agreements and natural gas developments highlight the partners’ focus on developing cooperation frameworks to mitigate both market and geopolitical challenges.</p>
<p>Dr. Seong-ik Oh, Director General for the Office of Central Land Tribunal at Korea’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, joins KEI’s program to share his research into these cooperation frameworks, discuss potential pitfalls, and analyze the future potential of trilateral energy cooperation. His research will appear in the Fall/Winter 2025 issue of Korea Policy, KEI’s flagship journal, this December.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States, South Korea, and Japan are enhancing their trilateral cooperation to secure natural gas supply chains in East Asia. Recent strategic agreements and natural gas developments highlight the partners’ focus on developing cooperation frameworks to mitigate both market and geopolitical challenges.</p>
<p>Dr. Seong-ik Oh, Director General for the Office of Central Land Tribunal at Korea’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, joins KEI’s program to share his research into these cooperation frameworks, discuss potential pitfalls, and analyze the future potential of trilateral energy cooperation. His research will appear in the Fall/Winter 2025 issue of Korea Policy, KEI’s flagship journal, this December.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="83891151" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/kznhfx8id94hbuqw/securing_east_asiabnwdm.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[The United States, South Korea, and Japan are enhancing their trilateral cooperation to secure natural gas supply chains in East Asia. Recent strategic agreements and natural gas developments highlight the partners’ focus on developing cooperation frameworks to mitigate both market and geopolitical challenges.
Dr. Seong-ik Oh, Director General for the Office of Central Land Tribunal at Korea’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, joins KEI’s program to share his research into these cooperation frameworks, discuss potential pitfalls, and analyze the future potential of trilateral energy cooperation. His research will appear in the Fall/Winter 2025 issue of Korea Policy, KEI’s flagship journal, this December.
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3495</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>227</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>The United States, South Korea, and Japan are enhancing their trilateral cooperation to secure natural gas supply chains in East Asia. Recent strategic agreements and natural gas developments highlight the partners’ focus on developing cooperation frameworks to mitigate both market and geopolitical challenges. Dr. Seong-ik Oh, Director General for the Office of Central Land Tribunal at Korea’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, joins KEI’s program to share his research into these cooperation frameworks, discuss potential pitfalls, and analyze the future potential of trilateral energy cooperation. His research will appear in the Fall/Winter 2025 issue of Korea Policy, KEI’s flagship journal, this December. [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>The U.S.-South Korea Allied Approach toward North Korea-Russia Cooperation</title>
        <itunes:title>The U.S.-South Korea Allied Approach toward North Korea-Russia Cooperation</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-us-south-korea-allied-approach-toward-north-korea-russia-cooperation/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-us-south-korea-allied-approach-toward-north-korea-russia-cooperation/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:14:46 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/156582c9-3978-35fd-a8b7-77883266ff75</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the signing of a “comprehensive strategic partnership treaty” between North Korea and Russia on June 19, 2024, ties between the two countries have only warmed as the war in Ukraine enters its fourth year. This year, North Korea-Russia relations have notably expanded beyond the security domain, whilst at the same time, deepening within the realm of security.  This heightened relationship, which both sides now refer to as an “alliance,” poses an ever-increasing threat to Washington, its alliance with Seoul, and the broader international community.</p>
<p>Such rapprochement between North Korea and Russia comes at a time when the U.S.-South Korea alliance faces important challenges, not least the commitments and expectations of both countries with respect to their alliance. The need to strengthen U.S.-South Korea ties—however difficult—has never been greater, both in combating mutual threats and furthering cooperation in new areas.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the signing of a “comprehensive strategic partnership treaty” between North Korea and Russia on June 19, 2024, ties between the two countries have only warmed as the war in Ukraine enters its fourth year. This year, North Korea-Russia relations have notably expanded beyond the security domain, whilst at the same time, deepening within the realm of security.  This heightened relationship, which both sides now refer to as an “alliance,” poses an ever-increasing threat to Washington, its alliance with Seoul, and the broader international community.</p>
<p>Such rapprochement between North Korea and Russia comes at a time when the U.S.-South Korea alliance faces important challenges, not least the commitments and expectations of both countries with respect to their alliance. The need to strengthen U.S.-South Korea ties—however difficult—has never been greater, both in combating mutual threats and furthering cooperation in new areas.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="84215439" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/zwfs2kbavgks3e45/Allied_Approach_toward_North_Korea79lq1.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Following the signing of a “comprehensive strategic partnership treaty” between North Korea and Russia on June 19, 2024, ties between the two countries have only warmed as the war in Ukraine enters its fourth year. This year, North Korea-Russia relations have notably expanded beyond the security domain, whilst at the same time, deepening within the realm of security.  This heightened relationship, which both sides now refer to as an “alliance,” poses an ever-increasing threat to Washington, its alliance with Seoul, and the broader international community.
Such rapprochement between North Korea and Russia comes at a time when the U.S.-South Korea alliance faces important challenges, not least the commitments and expectations of both countries with respect to their alliance. The need to strengthen U.S.-South Korea ties—however difficult—has never been greater, both in combating mutual threats and furthering cooperation in new areas.
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3508</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>226</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Following the signing of a “comprehensive strategic partnership treaty” between North Korea and Russia on June 19, 2024, ties between the two countries have only warmed as the war in Ukraine enters its fourth year. This year, North Korea-Russia relations have notably expanded beyond the security domain, whilst at the same time, deepening within the realm of security.  This heightened relationship, which both sides now refer to as an “alliance,” poses an ever-increasing threat to Washington, its alliance with Seoul, and the broader international community. Such rapprochement between North Korea and Russia comes at a time when the U.S.-South Korea alliance faces important challenges, not least the commitments and expectations of both countries with respect to their alliance. The need to strengthen U.S.-South Korea ties—however difficult—has never been greater, both in combating mutual threats and furthering cooperation in new areas. [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>American Attitudes toward the Korean Peninsula 2025</title>
        <itunes:title>American Attitudes toward the Korean Peninsula 2025</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/american-attitudes-toward-the-korean-peninsula-2025/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/american-attitudes-toward-the-korean-peninsula-2025/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:57:30 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/cf49be9e-65f3-3172-8123-ff23078b5556</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>The first year of the Trump administration in the United States and the first several months of the Lee administration in South Korea have brought significant changes to both domestic politics and foreign policy. As Americans adjust to this political transition, domestic and international issues remain at the forefront of public attention. </p>
<p>With US foreign policy more significant than ever due to ongoing geopolitical challenges in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, KEI, in partnership with YouGov, examined where American attitudes stand with regard to US-Korea relations. What are American opinions on the alliance’s role on the Korean Peninsula and beyond? How do Americans view US-Korea relations today? How do Americans differ in these outlooks?</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first year of the Trump administration in the United States and the first several months of the Lee administration in South Korea have brought significant changes to both domestic politics and foreign policy. As Americans adjust to this political transition, domestic and international issues remain at the forefront of public attention. </p>
<p>With US foreign policy more significant than ever due to ongoing geopolitical challenges in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, KEI, in partnership with YouGov, examined where American attitudes stand with regard to US-Korea relations. What are American opinions on the alliance’s role on the Korean Peninsula and beyond? How do Americans view US-Korea relations today? How do Americans differ in these outlooks?</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="84001167" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/v728fkt7uwczdjiw/American_Attitudes_toward_the_Korean_Peninsula_20258xwqc.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[The first year of the Trump administration in the United States and the first several months of the Lee administration in South Korea have brought significant changes to both domestic politics and foreign policy. As Americans adjust to this political transition, domestic and international issues remain at the forefront of public attention. 
With US foreign policy more significant than ever due to ongoing geopolitical challenges in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, KEI, in partnership with YouGov, examined where American attitudes stand with regard to US-Korea relations. What are American opinions on the alliance’s role on the Korean Peninsula and beyond? How do Americans view US-Korea relations today? How do Americans differ in these outlooks?
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3499</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>225</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>The first year of the Trump administration in the United States and the first several months of the Lee administration in South Korea have brought significant changes to both domestic politics and foreign policy. As Americans adjust to this political transition, domestic and international issues remain at the forefront of public attention.  With US foreign policy more significant than ever due to ongoing geopolitical challenges in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, KEI, in partnership with YouGov, examined where American attitudes stand with regard to US-Korea relations. What are American opinions on the alliance’s role on the Korean Peninsula and beyond? How do Americans view US-Korea relations today? How do Americans differ in these outlooks? [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>The U.S.-Korea Alliance and Economic Cooperation under Presidents Trump and Lee</title>
        <itunes:title>The U.S.-Korea Alliance and Economic Cooperation under Presidents Trump and Lee</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-us-korea-alliance-and-economic-cooperation-under-presidents-trump-and-lee/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-us-korea-alliance-and-economic-cooperation-under-presidents-trump-and-lee/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:50:13 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/1b97c370-ece1-3d4e-b020-b4b658a97c88</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>U.S.–South Korea relations have regained momentum after the election of President Lee Jae Myung in June, with the two sides signing a record trade deal in July and President Lee visiting Washington for a White House summit in August.</p>
<p>Yet both governments continue to confront pressing issues, including tariff negotiations, alliance modernization, and regional and global challenges involving North Korea and China. Managing divergent priorities and policy preferences will shape perceptions of alliance credibility and commitment.</p>
<p>At the same time, emerging areas of economic collaboration are beginning to take shape, creating opportunities to offset these frictions and expand trade even further.</p>
<p>Speakers:</p>
<p>Bruce Klingner, Senior Fellow at the Mansfield Foundation
Troy Stangarone, Non-Resident Fellow at the Carnegie Mellon Institute
KEI Director of Academic Affairs Ellen Kim </p>
<p> </p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S.–South Korea relations have regained momentum after the election of President Lee Jae Myung in June, with the two sides signing a record trade deal in July and President Lee visiting Washington for a White House summit in August.</p>
<p>Yet both governments continue to confront pressing issues, including tariff negotiations, alliance modernization, and regional and global challenges involving North Korea and China. Managing divergent priorities and policy preferences will shape perceptions of alliance credibility and commitment.</p>
<p>At the same time, emerging areas of economic collaboration are beginning to take shape, creating opportunities to offset these frictions and expand trade even further.</p>
<p>Speakers:</p>
<p>Bruce Klingner, Senior Fellow at the Mansfield Foundation<br>
Troy Stangarone, Non-Resident Fellow at the Carnegie Mellon Institute<br>
KEI Director of Academic Affairs Ellen Kim </p>
<p> </p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="94149135" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/etduzikhawej6y8t/The_US_Korea_Alliance9cvvd.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[U.S.–South Korea relations have regained momentum after the election of President Lee Jae Myung in June, with the two sides signing a record trade deal in July and President Lee visiting Washington for a White House summit in August.
Yet both governments continue to confront pressing issues, including tariff negotiations, alliance modernization, and regional and global challenges involving North Korea and China. Managing divergent priorities and policy preferences will shape perceptions of alliance credibility and commitment.
At the same time, emerging areas of economic collaboration are beginning to take shape, creating opportunities to offset these frictions and expand trade even further.
Speakers:
Bruce Klingner, Senior Fellow at the Mansfield FoundationTroy Stangarone, Non-Resident Fellow at the Carnegie Mellon InstituteKEI Director of Academic Affairs Ellen Kim 
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3922</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>224</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>U.S.–South Korea relations have regained momentum after the election of President Lee Jae Myung in June, with the two sides signing a record trade deal in July and President Lee visiting Washington for a White House summit in August. Yet both governments continue to confront pressing issues, including tariff negotiations, alliance modernization, and regional and global challenges involving North Korea and China. Managing divergent priorities and policy preferences will shape perceptions of alliance credibility and commitment. At the same time, emerging areas of economic collaboration are beginning to take shape, creating opportunities to offset these frictions and expand trade even further. Speakers: Bruce Klingner, Senior Fellow at the Mansfield Foundation Troy Stangarone, Non-Resident Fellow at the Carnegie Mellon Institute KEI Director of Academic Affairs Ellen Kim    [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Promoting Economic Cooperation at APEC Against the Backdrop of Geopolitical Uncertainty</title>
        <itunes:title>Promoting Economic Cooperation at APEC Against the Backdrop of Geopolitical Uncertainty</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/promoting-economic-cooperation-at-apec-against-the-backdrop-of-geopolitical-uncertainty/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/promoting-economic-cooperation-at-apec-against-the-backdrop-of-geopolitical-uncertainty/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:37:57 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/b2d98a47-d265-3eec-b786-caa81c22b2b7</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Audio issues resolve at 8:00</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Donald Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs has shaken the global trading order. At the same time, geopolitical rivalries among major powers are intensifying as Trump attempts to end the military conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, and the U.S.-China geoeconomic competition appears to be deepening as both sides test their respective economic leverage on each other while enhancing their respective supply chain resiliency.</p>
<p>Thus, South Korea assumes responsibility for hosting the APEC business and leaders’ meetings at a complex moment. The role of multilateral institutions in promoting international trade is under assault from rising tariffs, making the task of easing barriers to economic cooperation more difficult. The APEC summit in South Korea will be the first major multilateral economic meeting to occur following the Trump administration’s imposition of universal tariffs. Furthermore, the APEC summit is a potential venue for the first meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at a moment when a stable framework for managing U.S.-China economic relations has not yet been established.</p>
<p>Following the conclusion of the first summit between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, KEI will host a distinguished panel of Korean speakers, who will share their perspectives on the geoeconomic and geopolitical forces shaping South Korea’s approach to hosting the APEC leaders’ summit.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audio issues resolve at 8:00</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Donald Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs has shaken the global trading order. At the same time, geopolitical rivalries among major powers are intensifying as Trump attempts to end the military conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, and the U.S.-China geoeconomic competition appears to be deepening as both sides test their respective economic leverage on each other while enhancing their respective supply chain resiliency.</p>
<p>Thus, South Korea assumes responsibility for hosting the APEC business and leaders’ meetings at a complex moment. The role of multilateral institutions in promoting international trade is under assault from rising tariffs, making the task of easing barriers to economic cooperation more difficult. The APEC summit in South Korea will be the first major multilateral economic meeting to occur following the Trump administration’s imposition of universal tariffs. Furthermore, the APEC summit is a potential venue for the first meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at a moment when a stable framework for managing U.S.-China economic relations has not yet been established.</p>
<p>Following the conclusion of the first summit between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, KEI will host a distinguished panel of Korean speakers, who will share their perspectives on the geoeconomic and geopolitical forces shaping South Korea’s approach to hosting the APEC leaders’ summit.</p>
<p>[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="128394725" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/k5g3d4ng7qifhfkq/Promoting_Economic_Cooperationbp0d2.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Audio issues resolve at 8:00
 
The Donald Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs has shaken the global trading order. At the same time, geopolitical rivalries among major powers are intensifying as Trump attempts to end the military conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, and the U.S.-China geoeconomic competition appears to be deepening as both sides test their respective economic leverage on each other while enhancing their respective supply chain resiliency.
Thus, South Korea assumes responsibility for hosting the APEC business and leaders’ meetings at a complex moment. The role of multilateral institutions in promoting international trade is under assault from rising tariffs, making the task of easing barriers to economic cooperation more difficult. The APEC summit in South Korea will be the first major multilateral economic meeting to occur following the Trump administration’s imposition of universal tariffs. Furthermore, the APEC summit is a potential venue for the first meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at a moment when a stable framework for managing U.S.-China economic relations has not yet been established.
Following the conclusion of the first summit between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, KEI will host a distinguished panel of Korean speakers, who will share their perspectives on the geoeconomic and geopolitical forces shaping South Korea’s approach to hosting the APEC leaders’ summit.
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5349</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>223</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Audio issues resolve at 8:00   The Donald Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs has shaken the global trading order. At the same time, geopolitical rivalries among major powers are intensifying as Trump attempts to end the military conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, and the U.S.-China geoeconomic competition appears to be deepening as both sides test their respective economic leverage on each other while enhancing their respective supply chain resiliency. Thus, South Korea assumes responsibility for hosting the APEC business and leaders’ meetings at a complex moment. The role of multilateral institutions in promoting international trade is under assault from rising tariffs, making the task of easing barriers to economic cooperation more difficult. The APEC summit in South Korea will be the first major multilateral economic meeting to occur following the Trump administration’s imposition of universal tariffs. Furthermore, the APEC summit is a potential venue for the first meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at a moment when a stable framework for managing U.S.-China economic relations has not yet been established. Following the conclusion of the first summit between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, KEI will host a distinguished panel of Korean speakers, who will share their perspectives on the geoeconomic and geopolitical forces shaping South Korea’s approach to hosting the APEC leaders’ summit. [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Trilateralism Through Transition: Prospects for Strengthening U.S.-South Korea-Japan Partnership</title>
        <itunes:title>Trilateralism Through Transition: Prospects for Strengthening U.S.-South Korea-Japan Partnership</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/trilateralism-through-transition-prospects-for-strengthening-us-south-korea-japan-partnership/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/trilateralism-through-transition-prospects-for-strengthening-us-south-korea-japan-partnership/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:38:41 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/39c0ceaf-4d04-35d7-8e01-8f8d75afc0da</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[On August 18, 2023, U.S. President Joe Biden, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida convened at Camp David for the first standalone trilateral summit between the three countries. The three leaders reaffirmed and deepened consultative mechanisms, security and defense cooperation, and regional cooperative initiatives. All three countries have since undergone leadership transitions. The future of the trilateral relationship now lies with new leadership in each of the three countries.
 
Please join the Korea Economic Institute of America and the Mansfield Foundation for a timely event held on the second anniversary of the Camp David Summit.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 








]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[On August 18, 2023, U.S. President Joe Biden, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida convened at Camp David for the first standalone trilateral summit between the three countries. The three leaders reaffirmed and deepened consultative mechanisms, security and defense cooperation, and regional cooperative initiatives. All three countries have since undergone leadership transitions. The future of the trilateral relationship now lies with new leadership in each of the three countries.
 
Please join the Korea Economic Institute of America and the Mansfield Foundation for a timely event held on the second anniversary of the Camp David Summit.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 








]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="107349413" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/7gykhuvecm9hfuxz/Trilateralism_Through_Transition6lan3.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 18, 2023, U.S. President Joe Biden, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida convened at Camp David for the first standalone trilateral summit between the three countries. The three leaders reaffirmed and deepened consultative mechanisms, security and defense cooperation, and regional cooperative initiatives. All three countries have since undergone leadership transitions. The future of the trilateral relationship now lies with new leadership in each of the three countries.
 
Please join the Korea Economic Institute of America and the Mansfield Foundation for a timely event held on the second anniversary of the Camp David Summit.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 








]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4472</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>On August 18, 2023, U.S. President Joe Biden, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida convened at Camp David for the first standalone trilateral summit between the three countries. The three leaders reaffirmed and deepened consultative mechanisms, security and defense cooperation, and regional cooperative initiatives. All three countries have since undergone leadership transitions. The future of the trilateral relationship now lies with new leadership in each of the three countries.   Please join the Korea Economic Institute of America and the Mansfield Foundation for a timely event held on the second anniversary of the Camp David Summit.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>South Korea’s New President and Prospects for U.S.-Korea Relations: A View from Former Ambassadors</title>
        <itunes:title>South Korea’s New President and Prospects for U.S.-Korea Relations: A View from Former Ambassadors</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-new-president-and-prospects-for-us-korea-relations-a-view-from-former-ambassadors/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-new-president-and-prospects-for-us-korea-relations-a-view-from-former-ambassadors/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:49:27 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/4e05f551-8648-3b70-93be-92d0dc3ad8ae</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
 
Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
 
Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="90796901" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/p694upgn96ba8tny/South_Koreas_New_President_and_Prospects_for_USKorea_Relations_A_View_from_Former_Ambassadors7y51t.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.
 
Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3782</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>On June 3, South Koreans elected Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung as the country’s next president. He was inaugurated amid deep domestic political polarization and uncertainty in external trade and security dynamics. How the new leader navigates such internal and external conditions has important implications for the U.S.-South Korea relationship and regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific.   Please join a distinguished panel of former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea to analyze the election outcome and implications for the alliance. Moderated by KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder, Ambassadors Philip Goldberg (2022–2025), Harry Harris (2018–2021), and Kathleen Stephens (2008–2011) discuss these topics and more.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>From Peaceful Unification to Two Koreas? Paradigm Shifts in Inter-Korean Relations</title>
        <itunes:title>From Peaceful Unification to Two Koreas? Paradigm Shifts in Inter-Korean Relations</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/from-peaceful-unification-to-two-koreas-paradigm-shifts-in-inter-korean-relations/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/from-peaceful-unification-to-two-koreas-paradigm-shifts-in-inter-korean-relations/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:37:43 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/f96f3811-3d4c-394f-9978-99a945036088</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="85380773" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/wj74a8ca4z45xi85/peaceful_unificationbsfmk.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3557</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>220</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>For decades, inter-Korean relations have oscillated between confrontation and cautious engagement, grounded in a shared yet contested aspiration of eventual peaceful unification. This aspiration, rooted in nationalist ideals and constitutional mandates on both sides of the 38th parallel, has shaped the political lexicon and security posture of both Seoul and Pyongyang throughout. Yet developments since the beginning of last year suggest that North Korea under Kim Jong Un is abandoning the peaceful reunification paradigm altogether. At the turn of 2024, Pyongyang publicly reframed the Republic of Korea not as a compatriot regime but as a separate, hostile state. Speaking at a session of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament, Kim issued orders to reify that political decision in the country’s society, military, and economy. The pivot marks a potentially irreversible rupture in inter-Korean relations — one with consequences not only for the Korean Peninsula but also for regional geopolitics. This article explores three interrelated dimensions of that apparently transformative policy turn. First, it examines the nature, drivers, and implementation of North Korea’s paradigm shift on unification and reconciliation. Second, it analyzes the spectrum of South Korean political responses, from government policy to public sentiment. Finally, it reflects on the potential long-term implications of this shift for the future of the peninsula and the broader security environment in Northeast Asia.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>The Globalization of K-Culture</title>
        <itunes:title>The Globalization of K-Culture</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-globalization-of-k-culture/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/the-globalization-of-k-culture/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:12:15 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/358e566f-79ce-3fd6-9ed0-355d2d403923</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="94368101" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/2r3u28kmp2x8x4cr/Globalization_of_K_Culture8cq5u.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3931</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>KEI Operations Manager Mai Pressley sits down with Areum Jeong, assistant professor of Korean Studies at Arizona State University, and Jeanie Chang, a licensed therapist and founder of “Noona’s Noonchi,” to discuss the global impact of Korean culture, what attracts international fans, and how domestic social issues are portrayed in popular culture and resonate abroad.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea</title>
        <itunes:title>Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/beyond-the-demographic-cliff-economic-adaptation-in-hyper-aged-korea/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/beyond-the-demographic-cliff-economic-adaptation-in-hyper-aged-korea/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/24285d6a-bc33-33c5-b6e1-9cbbfe5c7886</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.
 
KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.
 
By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.
 
Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.
 
KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.
 
By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.
 
Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="84217253" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/2pt9757v3dpftdbj/Beyond_the_Demographic_Cliff_Economic_Adaptation_in_Hyper_Aged_Korea632ad.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.
 
KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.
 
By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.
 
Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3508</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>218</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event, “Beyond the Demographic Cliff: Economic Adaptation in Hyper-Aged Korea,” which examines how South Korea can redesign its economic structures to sustain prosperity and promote national security under conditions of demographic maturity.   KEI Non-Resident Fellow Darcie Draudt-Véjares will discuss this research into South Korea’s demographics and help attendees better understand how and why South Korea’s efforts to reverse its world-low fertility rates have failed.   By 2070, Korea’s population is projected to shrink by 27%, with older adults comprising nearly half the total. But the country can also adapt to this new reality, prioritizing age-smart industrial policy and retooling national strategies around longevity and capital efficiency. This includes increasing investment in financial literacy, pension equity, and regional specialization. Dr. Draudt-Véjares’s full report on these pathways forward will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due out in early June.   Dr. Ellen Kim, KEI’s Director of Academic Programs, will host this hybrid panel event on Monday, May 19, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT at the KEI event space in Washington, D.C. and live on YouTube.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Unpacking South Korea’s 2025 Presidential Election</title>
        <itunes:title>Unpacking South Korea’s 2025 Presidential Election</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/unpacking-south-korea-s-2025-presidential-election/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/unpacking-south-korea-s-2025-presidential-election/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 17:43:26 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/9350e8f1-f510-3284-a480-84f3830ac51b</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
 
KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
 
KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="89053292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/tn2hzar685k7knui/Unpacking_South_Korea_s_2025_Presidential_Election6ipgt.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
 
KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3710</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Voters will soon elect a new leader for South Korea, who will shape the country’s economy, domestic politics, and foreign policy for the next half-decade. This event will help attendees better understand the major fault lines in the presidential election, identify key issues for voters, and interpret what each leading candidate could mean for the U.S.-South Korea relationship.   KEI President and CEO Scott Snyder will moderate a discussion between three leading U.S. and South Korean journalists who will offer informed, on-the-ground perspectives on the presidential frontrunners. The conversation will explore the factors shaping the election, including economic challenges, national security concerns, and regional dynamics, along with generational and other divides among the electorate.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context</title>
        <itunes:title>South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-geoeconomic-strategy-industrial-policy-in-comparative-context/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/south-korea-s-geoeconomic-strategy-industrial-policy-in-comparative-context/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 16:57:12 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/a0caf189-d3cc-3679-978b-931cdf5de242</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.
 
Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.
 
Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="85037663" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/rnx9wh8x4hwznees/South_Koreas_Geoeconomic_Strategy_Industrial_Policy_in_Comparative_Context881yf.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.
 
Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3542</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>216</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>KEI is pleased to hold a program on South Korea’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Industrial Policy in Comparative Context. Like other countries, South Korea faces an increasingly uncertain and fractious global political economy marked by the exclusionary trade and investment policies, export controls, and a hardening of geopolitical fault lines. In this context, South Korea—and Korean firms—must consider a range of industrial policies as part of its broader geoeconomic strategy.   Please come join KEI’s program with KEI’s Non-resident Fellow Dr. Sunhyung Lee, which offers a discussion on the evolution of South Korea’s industrial policies in comparison to those of the United States, China, and Japan as well as patterns in the investment flows of South Korean firms. Dr. Lee’s research will be featured in the spring/summer issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Managing US-South Korea Relations under the Shadow of Impeachment</title>
        <itunes:title>Managing US-South Korea Relations under the Shadow of Impeachment</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/managing-us-south-korea-relations-under-the-shadow-of-impeachment/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/managing-us-south-korea-relations-under-the-shadow-of-impeachment/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 16:42:23 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/6b09fb46-c7f3-3128-8d1a-cfe91eb1b5ab</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?
 
Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?
 
Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="82207775" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/9t68v6vthi74sde9/Managing_US-South_Korea_Relations_under_the_Shadow_of_Impeachmentb7ayn.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?
 
Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.
 
[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] 






]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute of America</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3424</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>215</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol currently faces both an impeachment trial and a criminal trial for his declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, and related charges of seeking to undermine South Korea’s democratic processes. If the Constitutional Court rules to uphold Yoon’s impeachment, he would be the second president in the country’s history to be impeached and formally removed from office following Park Geun-hye’s removal from office in 2017, an event which coincided with the beginning of the first Trump administration. What is the impact on alliance management that results from a prolonged vacuum in South Korean leadership and the resulting political transition? How do alliance managers cope with such circumstances and what is the overall impact on alliance consultations and cooperation mechanisms under such circumstances?   Please join KEI for a discussion with U.S.-South Korea alliance managers to assess the status and prospects for the U.S.-South Korea relationship under the shadow of Yoon’s impeachment proceedings. Ahn Ho-young, former South Korean ambassador to the United States (2013 to 2017), Vincent Brooks, former commander of United States Forces Korea, United Nations Command, and ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (2016 to 2018), and Sheena Chestnut Greitens, associate professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, will discuss these topics and more.   [This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region</title>
        <itunes:title>Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/recalibration-in-the-indo-pacific-perspectives-from-the-region/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/recalibration-in-the-indo-pacific-perspectives-from-the-region/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:26:31 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/9782e914-dcad-39dc-98d6-3a91815cd2da</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order?</p>
<p>Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order?</p>
<p>Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="200963406" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/4jkrpxg8t8gx5xy2/RECAL.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order?
Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>8372</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>214</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] KEI is pleased to hold a program titled, Recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from the Region. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and ongoing U.S.-China strategic competition raises critical questions for U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, including: Will narrowing strategic space between the United States and China force regional states into increasingly challenging foreign policy dilemmas? Alternatively, will regional states assert agency and seek greater autonomy? To what degree are we already in a multipolar international order and, if so, what affect will an intensifying U.S.-China competition have on that order? Please come join KEI’s program with regional experts, which offers a two-part panel discussion featuring South Korea, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, and Singapore’s perspectives on these and other important questions facing the region. The panelists’ research will be featured in the spring/summer 2025 issue of KEI’s flagship journal, Korea Policy, due to be published in digital format in early June.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>All Hands on Deck: Korea's Strategic Role in Revitalizing U.S. Shipbuilding</title>
        <itunes:title>All Hands on Deck: Korea's Strategic Role in Revitalizing U.S. Shipbuilding</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/all-hands-on-deck-koreas-strategic-role-in-revitalizing-us-shipbuilding/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/all-hands-on-deck-koreas-strategic-role-in-revitalizing-us-shipbuilding/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 13:15:32 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/1f7abd10-320a-3d25-a507-0a5c9b0a414f</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow.</p>
<p>Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow.</p>
<p>Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="106568208" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/secs8mh7bnrtbgdm/all_hands_on_deck_podacytr.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow.
Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4439</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>213</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] In 2024, Korean shipbuilders Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries both entered into Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) agreements to support U.S. naval vessels in Korean yards. That same year, Hanwha acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, while HD Hyundai partnered with Anduril and Palantir to advance artificial intelligence innovations in unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous naval systems, building on previous partnerships with Palantir to develop smart shipyard solutions. As the United States experiences a dearth of both naval and commercial shipbuilding capacity, U.S.-China competition at sea has led Washington to consider additional ways of revitalizing America’s once dominant position in the maritime domain. Legislative efforts such as the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act include potential to leverage allied support in strengthening the U.S. shipbuilding process, as does greater cooperation between the U.S. and Korean governments through the White House’s newly announced Shipbuilding Office. With Korean shipbuilders leading in advanced maritime technology and industrial capacity, their role in servicing and constructing U.S. naval and commercial maritime assets—both domestically and overseas—is poised to grow. Please join KEI for a discussion with experts in the field to assess the status and prospects for the US-South Korea strategic cooperation in shipbuilding. Colin Grabow, Associate Director at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, and Michael Viggiano, Director of Government Affairs for Defense at Hanwha USA, will discuss these topics and more.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict</title>
        <itunes:title>Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siloed-no-more-the-us-rok-alliance-and-a-taiwan-conflict/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/siloed-no-more-the-us-rok-alliance-and-a-taiwan-conflict/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:50:02 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/35dbf835-3b10-3ee5-b61a-ac9c7f253f15</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan.</p>
<p>KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.</p>
<p>Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective.</p>
<p>Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency.</p>
<p>KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan.</p>
<p>KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.</p>
<p>Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective.</p>
<p>Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency.</p>
<p>KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="86308904" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ikz3y4srguvqycue/Siloed_No_More_PODbdgc0.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan.
KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective.
Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency.
KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3595</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>212</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] KEI is pleased to host an exclusive event titled Siloed No More: The U.S.-ROK Alliance and a Taiwan Conflict, which examines whether and how the U.S.-ROK alliance is situated to respond to a potential conflict over Taiwan. KEI Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs Dr. Clint Work will discuss this project, which builds upon previous research on Seoul and Washington’s rhetorical alignment on the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Alexis Turek, Research Assistant at the Coalition for Defense of Taiwan (CDOT), a joint initiative between the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), will join Dr. Work on stage and offer insights into how his findings fit into broader strategic thinking about Taiwan from a U.S. perspective. Through dozens of interviews with U.S. and ROK current and former government officials, think tank experts, and academics—as well as open-source research—Dr. Work will distill insights on the evolution and state of U.S.-ROK alliance discussions on a Taiwan conflict; key challenges obstructing such discussions; and critical variables and dynamics the alliance would have to consider and navigate in the event of a contingency. KEI will publish an executive summary of Dr. Work’s research as well as the full special report concurrent with the event.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>What Are Current American Attitudes Toward the Korean Peninsula?</title>
        <itunes:title>What Are Current American Attitudes Toward the Korean Peninsula?</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/keififthannualsurveydiscussion/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/keififthannualsurveydiscussion/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:04:55 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/56c0e2a1-bb62-3d5e-940b-c5db7144a0e7</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: <a href='https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share'>https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share</a> .</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: <a href='https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share'>https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="40027352" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/vi9a5hus5nxrw7pa/edit_mixdown.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.
 
This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share .]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>1667</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>Scott Snyder and James Kim of KEI sat down with Dina Smeltz from The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to discuss the results of KEI's 5th Annual Survey Report, and the current perceptions Americans have towards the Korean Peninsula.   This is a follow-up conversation to the live event KEI hosted about the survey results. You can find that event here: https://youtube.com/live/IQdVPZOKGpo?feature=share .</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
    <item>
        <title>NATO and the Indo-Pacific Partners</title>
        <itunes:title>NATO and the Indo-Pacific Partners</itunes:title>
        <link>https://keia.podbean.com/e/nato-and-the-indo-pacific-partners/</link>
                    <comments>https://keia.podbean.com/e/nato-and-the-indo-pacific-partners/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">keia.podbean.com/b0a3c293-a887-330e-9a90-ef049136236d</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]</p>
<p>NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure length="129368212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/gxi2tpup3babja4w/NATO_POD91xjy.mp3"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]
NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Korea Economic Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5389</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>210</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            <author>podcast@keia.org (Korea Economic Institute)</author><itunes:subtitle>[KEI is registered under the FARA as an agent of the KIEP, a public corporation established by the government of the Republic of Korea. Additional information is available at the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.] NATO’s 75th Anniversary Summit was held in Washington, DC, on July 9–11, and its Indo-Pacific Partners (IP4)—Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand—attended as they did NATO’s 2022 Madrid and 2023 Vilnius summits. NATO has made clear that although it remains dedicated to the defense of its Transatlantic area, the challenges with which it is dealing are global and immediate. The attendance of the IP4 is a demonstration that NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners perceive common interests in coping with an increasingly dangerous world. On July 18, 2024 KEI hosted a discussion of the Washington NATO Summit and the future of cooperation with the IP4 with NATO’s Director for Partnerships and Global Affairs, Kristian Meszaros, and leading experts on Japan, Korea, and Australia and New Zealand: Mirna Galic from USIP, Dr. Hyun Ji Rim from SAIS, and Kathryn Paik from CSIS. The discussion was moderated by Dr. Clint Work, Fellow and Director of Academic Affairs from KEI.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>News,Politics,Society,Culture,Korea,South,Korea,North,Korea,ROK,DPRK,Foreign,Policy,International,Relations,Korean,American,Korea,Watchers,KEI,Korea,Economic,Institute,Security,Defense,Asia,Peninsula</itunes:keywords></item>
</channel>
</rss>