<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Law Firm Web Strategy</title>
	
	<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog</link>
	<description>by Steve Matthews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:14:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LFWS-Comments" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing Google OS! Kinda… by Steve Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/announcing-google-os-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=200#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Perhaps. But I've also read commentary that says this was a direct response to Bing, and MS pushing hard on the search front. Which also makes sense, but either way, I don't have an issue with more competition in either market. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps. But I&#8217;ve also read commentary that says this was a direct response to Bing, and MS pushing hard on the search front. Which also makes sense, but either way, I don&#8217;t have an issue with more competition in either market. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing Google OS! Kinda… by David Knott</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/announcing-google-os-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>David Knott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=200#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>I agree from a personal standpoint, but from a marketing standpoint you have to give them credit. They are creating buzz this far off will certainly let them get off to a fast start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree from a personal standpoint, but from a marketing standpoint you have to give them credit. They are creating buzz this far off will certainly let them get off to a fast start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s Your Tweetable Elevator Pitch? by Steve Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/whats-your-tweetable-elevator-pitch/comment-page-1/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=192#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, Thorne. Yours is a cleaner alternative. By including the extra terms I was hoping to get the reader to ask, 'what kind of work?', and perhaps inspired further investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Thorne. Yours is a cleaner alternative. By including the extra terms I was hoping to get the reader to ask, &#8216;what kind of work?&#8217;, and perhaps inspired further investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s Your Tweetable Elevator Pitch? by Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/whats-your-tweetable-elevator-pitch/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=192#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>RE: "Stem does leg work to help law firms get noticed:"

You couldn't shorten this and make it more direct: 

"Stem helps law firms get noticed:"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;Stem does leg work to help law firms get noticed:&#8221;</p>
<p>You couldn&#8217;t shorten this and make it more direct: </p>
<p>&#8220;Stem helps law firms get noticed:&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clark Wilson LLP Guest Blogs at Slaw.ca by Law Firm Web Strategy : Stem Client Roundup for June ‘09</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/clark-wilson-llp-guest-blogs-at-slaw-ca/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Firm Web Strategy : Stem Client Roundup for June ‘09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=162#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>[...] Megawatt and Canadian Trademark Blog writers join forces with new bloggers to produce 10 outstanding posts throughout the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Megawatt and Canadian Trademark Blog writers join forces with new bloggers to produce 10 outstanding posts throughout the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Twitter by The Problem with Twitter | Library Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/the-problem-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>The Problem with Twitter | Library Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=119#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Matthews – “I understand that blogs are hard work, and that twitter is easier. So what? If you’re going to put hours into this, the last thing you want to do is take the easy way out. As the TechCrunch post says, blogging delivers those memorable pieces that you (and others!) will refer to for years to come.”   Posted in Uncategorized | | Top Of Page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Matthews &#8211; &#8220;I understand that blogs are hard work, and that twitter is easier. So what? If you’re going to put hours into this, the last thing you want to do is take the easy way out. As the TechCrunch post says, blogging delivers those memorable pieces that you (and others!) will refer to for years to come.&#8221;   Posted in Uncategorized | | Top Of Page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinkedIn Lawyers Hit 840K by CCHatter » Blog Archive » Lawyers and social networks – playing with numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/linkedin-lawyers-hit-840k/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>CCHatter » Blog Archive » Lawyers and social networks – playing with numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=156#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>[...] Author: Linda Moore    The number of lawyers on business social network LinkedIn has hit 840,000, according to Stem Legal’s Steve Matthews.  Apparently the number of lawyers on LinkedIn is growing at approximately double the rate of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Author: Linda Moore    The number of lawyers on business social network LinkedIn has hit 840,000, according to Stem Legal’s Steve Matthews.  Apparently the number of lawyers on LinkedIn is growing at approximately double the rate of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New additions to LawBlogs.ca by Law Firm Web Strategy : Latest additions to LawBlogs.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/new-additions-to-lawblogsca/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Firm Web Strategy : Latest additions to LawBlogs.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=141#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>[...] total of 14 new Canadian law blogs since our April update. Congratulations to all, and as always, let us know of any that are missing, and we’ll get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] total of 14 new Canadian law blogs since our April update. Congratulations to all, and as always, let us know of any that are missing, and we&#8217;ll get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LexisNexis says TCO for SaaS 22% Less by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>That is great. Not suprising at all. 

In response to the previous comment, I have used NetDocuments. Still do. It is great. 

I think google is right by saying that soon our only program will be our web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is great. Not suprising at all. </p>
<p>In response to the previous comment, I have used NetDocuments. Still do. It is great. </p>
<p>I think google is right by saying that soon our only program will be our web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LexisNexis says TCO for SaaS 22% Less by Leonard Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Steve: those of us who live in the SaaS world and have serviced law firms welcome your perspective and coverage of this release by Lexis. To confirm what you are stating, NetDocuments has had large firms using SaaS-based DMS for years now, including Dorsey &amp; Whitney, Kutak Rock, Lewis Brisbois, etc. all over 1000 users.  There is also a difference if "web-based" and SaaS and I question if Interaction is truly "SaaS".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: those of us who live in the SaaS world and have serviced law firms welcome your perspective and coverage of this release by Lexis. To confirm what you are stating, NetDocuments has had large firms using SaaS-based DMS for years now, including Dorsey &amp; Whitney, Kutak Rock, Lewis Brisbois, etc. all over 1000 users.  There is also a difference if &#8220;web-based&#8221; and SaaS and I question if Interaction is truly &#8220;SaaS&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawyer Marketing with Twitter by Twitter and the Virtual Law Office « Virtual Law Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/lawyer-marketing-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and the Virtual Law Office « Virtual Law Practice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/lawyer-marketing-with-twitter/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>[...] Lawyer Marketing with Twitter, Steve Mathews (@stevematthews) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lawyer Marketing with Twitter, Steve Mathews (@stevematthews) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Legal Ranks Swell on LinkedIn by Blawg Review #207</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legal-ranks-swell-on-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #207</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=142#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>[...] a defendant to examine the plaintiff’s computer to determine his patterns of Facebook usage. Steve Matthews of Stem Legal noted the astonishing one-year increase in the number of lawyers on LinkedIn, from 118,000 in April [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a defendant to examine the plaintiff&#8217;s computer to determine his patterns of Facebook usage. Steve Matthews of Stem Legal noted the astonishing one-year increase in the number of lawyers on LinkedIn, from 118,000 in April [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Legal Ranks Swell on LinkedIn by Steve Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legal-ranks-swell-on-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=142#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>Charon: When we add United Kingdom in quotes to the search, the results trim down to 25k profile pages. About the same as Canada. Does that help?

Doug: Chalk it up to not enough data points. This is a simple BF reminder to re-run the search and monitor the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charon: When we add United Kingdom in quotes to the search, the results trim down to 25k profile pages. About the same as Canada. Does that help?</p>
<p>Doug: Chalk it up to not enough data points. This is a simple BF reminder to re-run the search and monitor the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New additions to LawBlogs.ca by Brian Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/new-additions-to-lawblogsca/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=141#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Thanks for listing my new blog, Steve!  I just launched my blog and it's been a great experience so far.  Having just discovered your blog, I'm really impressed and will now be a regular visitor.  You've got some great info.  Cheers, Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for listing my new blog, Steve!  I just launched my blog and it&#8217;s been a great experience so far.  Having just discovered your blog, I&#8217;m really impressed and will now be a regular visitor.  You&#8217;ve got some great info.  Cheers, Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Legal Ranks Swell on LinkedIn by Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legal-ranks-swell-on-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=142#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Steve -

I have noticed lawyers poring into LinkedIn over the last year. (But just like other internet profile platforms, many are abandoned and not actively updated.)

One thing I find odd about the graph is that it looks fairly linear. I would have expected it to have more of a curve upward showing rapid adoption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve -</p>
<p>I have noticed lawyers poring into LinkedIn over the last year. (But just like other internet profile platforms, many are abandoned and not actively updated.)</p>
<p>One thing I find odd about the graph is that it looks fairly linear. I would have expected it to have more of a curve upward showing rapid adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
