Back in late 2001, one of us asked the old man if it was the worst year he’d ever lived through.

He made the point that while 2001 had been hard, it couldn’t hold a candle to the sheer madness of twelve months that began with the Tet Offensive in January, stumbled on to the assassination of Dr. King in April, and then only six weeks later Robert Kennedy in June. By the Fall cities across the country had seen rioting, looting and widespread arson, and in October the Chicago police took a firm stand against justice and freedom of speech behind billy clubs, riot shields and clouds of teargas right outside the site of the Democratic National Convention. And if that wasn’t enough, in November, Richard Nixon was elected 37th President of a United States of America that barely merited the name.

He had a point: 1968 must have been one hell of a dark ride.

But there is another way to look at it. 1968 — not just in the United States, but in much of the world — had something that 2001 (and all the years since) just didn’t. In both years there was war and the myriad pandaemons that spring, enraged, from its head. In both years there was jingoism and there were true believers who saw nothing beyond their own limited dogmas. There was intolerance of dissent and suppression of dissenters. In both times, there was mindless bigotry. In 1968 as in 2001 there were undercurrents of fear racing through the streets and demagogues aplenty in both times to wield that insecurity as a cudgel.

But what 1968 had in spades, and 2001 sorely lacked, was a resistance.

Sure, there were those of us who resisted the insanity in the salad days of this millennium, but we weren’t a resistance. We didn’t have the necessary coefficient of political friction to be more than an entertaining sideshow in the mad circus of a lurching empire.

We shouted and were ignored. And that we were right on virtually every count, doesn’t do much to salve the tragedy of so many lives lost, so much power and wealth distributed upwards, so many families brought to economic ruin. Hell, in many ways that feeling of political and economic irrelevancy is what drove us to sneak out of camp one night and disappear over the southern border, pausing for just a moment at dawn to look back as the caravan zombied towards the ringing of the next Taco Bell, the dim light of the Starbucks just over the horizon.

Adios, amigos. Nos vamos al sur.

But now we’re getting to wonder if there’s a dance in the old dame, yet.

We came down this way to live, work, create, bird-dog and booze-hound with abandon. But also with the background hope of producing some things of value that we could reinject back into the world we’d left behind. One is the spirit of Café No Sé, and after eight years of hearing people tell us that we’re the bar they’ve been searching for, the one that’s the right mix of spiritual anarchy, intellectual stimulation and physical debauchery, that we think we’ve done a pretty good job. Another is Ilegal Mezcal. Everything about our mezcal speaks to the spirit we thought was lost for good up north. It’s a damn-near holy drink. The agave is grown and harvested by real, individual, independent farmers. It’s produced, distilled and aged by a real, independent mezcalero, and it’s consumed by real and thoughtful drinkers. We’ve made this business as much with our wits and our balls as anything else, and now it’s hitting big back at home. There’s something inspirational about that. Maybe it will become the booze of the new resistance. The Ilegal 99!

Because, clearly, we were wrong about our old stomping grounds. Even if it slid right past our generation, them kids out at Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Oakland and Occupy Every Damn Place In Between seem to get it in the old 1968 kind of way, and with this issue of La Cuadra, we want to share a spirit of solidarity with our brothers and sisters on the line. So we’ve put together this mag with an eye towards honoring the élan of rebellion, resistance and intolerance for fools who rule us by dint of their power, not their honor.

In these pages there’s a story about a girl who, years back, launched a revolution in a classroom and in the process found something golden in her soul. There’s an analysis of politics in Guatemala (something we’ve avoided until now, but what the hell — somebody’s gotta tell the gringos what’s going on.) There’s a rumination on the need to resist dominant paradigms in development work, a story of some very resistant sea-turtles and a bit of wisdom from James Stephens in his poem, What Thomas An Buiel Said In A Pub. We’re proud of this one.

So, we’ll see you in the bar and at the barricades. Fist raised and smiling.

MJT and JPR

Facts About Guatemala Coffee Production and Anacafé

Guatemala as an average produces more than 3.8 million 60 kilo bags of coffee per year that yields around, thanks to more than 90,000 coffee producers than the Guatemalan National Coffee Association – Anacafé – represents and who are registered in our Association. We appreciate this space to let your readers know some important facts about Anacafé, some of them incorrectly mentioned in the article written by Laura Shearer and published on La Cuadra March / April issue:

● Several cases are mentioned in the article, regarding the procedures and supposed experiences that some members of coffee producer’s cooperatives have gone through while trying to get their export license, unfortunately they are all anonymous. If concrete cases could be provided, we could verify them and follow up accordingly, if necessary.

● As you know, coffee can be exported in different forms (green beans, roasted, as an extract, as finished product, ready to drink – RTD -, etc.) and therefore different types of licenses can be issued, depending also if it is a registered coffee producer or not. In any event, the requisites are quite simple, clear and legal, the procedure is fast, and once the appropriate requirements are fulfilled. The rules and regulations in order to export coffee, and hence to obtain a license, are clearly stated and it does not depend on a personal decision.

● It is crucial to protect not only the buyer (importer) and exporter, but to keep the outstanding reputation of the coffee producers, exporters and Guatemalan Coffees; that is, nationally and internationally.

● ANACAFE does not buy or export coffee. We operate on a free market basis. Once again, if you have solid proof that one of our representatives or technicians is doing so, we would appreciate to know the details to take further action.

Our Association provides free of charge, technical training and assistance, cupping laboratories, internet access, web site design, experimental farming to all coffee producers registered, through all our regional offices in the country.

Furthermore, for your information we do have a foundation (www.funcafe.org) that works on three main topics in rural areas: Education, Health and Food Safety, providing services to more than 800,000 people located in rural areas near coffee production zones all over the country.

Regarding issues related to child labor, on February 2009, the Board of Directors and International Labor Organization declared an official Statement in regards to this matter: “The Guatemalan coffee producers are interested and have the best disposition to produce and to export quality coffee, free of child labor, complying with national and international regulations and recognizing children rights as a priority right for human development in our country, in an environment of competitiveness and peace culture. Our vision is have Guatemalan coffee production free of child labor”

Since Anacafe was founded in 1960, we worked to provide new services and knowledge to improve coffee production and quality. We are aware that there is plenty of room for improvement and there are several subjects to discover and to improve, but we are working hard to give our best efforts to improve the quality of life and development in the coffee regions. We do invite you and all your readers to visit our site www.anacafe.org, where a lot of information can be found, otherwise feel free to stop by any of our offices located throughout Guatemala.

Sincerely,

Guatemalan National Coffee Association.

The Author Responds:

I appreciate Anacafé’s offer to follow-up on the cases of the cooperatives whose experiences applying for an export license I reported upon. These cooperatives, however, wish to remain anonymous. I also commend Anacafé’s intent to act on the cases I reported of Anacafé representatives offering to purchase coffee from producers. If I am able to gather more details about these cases, I will provide this to the Association.

I wish to make a correction: I reported that the cooperative from Huehuetenango applied for a producer-exporter license and that Anacafé required the cooperative to be a Sociedad Anónima and prove they had Q500,000 in capital. I since learned that this group is involved with two entities: one which applied for a producer-exporter license and one which applied for a purchaser-exporter license. It is the entity which applied for the purchaser-exporter license that was required to be a Sociedad Anónima and prove they had Q500,000 in capital. This explains why Anacafé enforced these requirements, as the purchaser-exporter license involves a capital assessment. I apologize for this error. To confirm: The entity applying for the purchaser-exporter license did become a Sociedad Anónima and raise the capital. Neither group has received a license to date.