<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.littler.com/rss/blogs/rss.xml/79521" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Littler.com Blog RSS Feed</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/rss/blogs/rss.xml/79521</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
        
  <item>

    <title>The NLRB&#039;s General Counsel Issues Guidance on the New Accelerated Election Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrbs-general-counsel-issues-guidance-new-accelerated-election-rules</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;109&quot; height=&quot;136&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Union%20vote2_1.JPG?1428507596&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On April 14, 2015, the National Labor Relations Board&amp;#39;s controversial &amp;quot;quickie election&amp;quot; rule goes into effect. &amp;nbsp;This week, the NLRB&amp;#39;s General Counsel, Richard F.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrbs-general-counsel-issues-guidance-new-accelerated-election-rules&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">138646 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB General Counsel Issues Report Concerning Legality of Common Employer Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-issues-report-concerning-legality-common-employer-rules</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;160&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/report3_1.JPG?1426778213&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/frederick-c-miner&quot;&gt;Frederick C. Miner &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/adam-paul-john-tuzzo&quot;&gt;Adam-Paul John Tuzzo &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NLRB General Counsel Richard Griffin issued yesterday a &lt;a href=&quot;http://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d4581b37135&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report Concerning Employer Rules&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, in a stated effort to provide guidance on the intersection of employer rules and the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).&amp;nbsp; The Report includes conclusions about common handbook policies that employers &amp;ndash; both nonunion and unionized &amp;ndash; may find surprising.&amp;nbsp; Employers should pay careful attention to this new guidance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-issues-report-concerning-legality-common-employer-rules&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137806 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Wisconsin Becomes Next &quot;Right to Work&quot; State</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/wisconsin-becomes-next-right-work-state</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;On March 6, 2015, Wisconsin&amp;rsquo;s State Assembly approved legislation that will make Wisconsin the 25th &amp;ldquo;Right to Work&amp;rdquo; state in the country.&amp;nbsp; Governor Walker has said he intends to sign 2015 Assembly Bill 61 into law within days.&amp;nbsp; The legislation significantly modifies Chapter 111 of the Wisconsin Statutes by, among other things, prohibiting employers and labor organizations from requiring employees to join, remain a member of, or financially support a labor organization as a condition of employment.&amp;nbsp; Violation of the law will be a Class A misdemeanor.&amp;nbsp;Con&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/wisconsin-becomes-next-right-work-state&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137411 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB GC Files First Lawsuit Against Franchisor as Joint Employer</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-gc-files-first-lawsuit-against-franchisor-joint-employer</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/legal-scale%20copy_0.jpg?1419021065&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As expected, the National Labor Relations Board&amp;#39;s Office of the General Counsel&amp;nbsp;has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/nlrb-office-general-counsel-issues-consolidated-complaints-against&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;filed an unfair labor practice complaint&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; against a franchisor and some of its franchisees as joint employers. The Board &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/workplace-policy-update/nlrb-general-counsel-takes-aim-franchises&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;first announced&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; it might take action against McDonald&amp;#39;s USA LLC for alleged actions of its franchisees in July of this year.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-gc-files-first-lawsuit-against-franchisor-joint-employer&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133826 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>The NLRB Issues its Long-Anticipated &quot;Quickie Election&quot; Rule, Making Union Organizing Faster and Easier</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-issues-its-long-anticipated-quickie-election-rule-making-union-organizi</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_78856576_ballot_box_voting_3.jpg?1418662772&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On December 15, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board (&amp;quot;NLRB&amp;quot;) published its long-anticipated Final Rule on &amp;quot;quickie elections.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; The Final Rule, which is scheduled to go into effect on April 14, 2015, significantly tilts the NLRB&amp;#39;s election procedures in favor of unions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-issues-its-long-anticipated-quickie-election-rule-making-union-organizi&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133646 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Creates Right to Use Corporate E-Mail to Organize and to Complain About Work: Ten Key Implications for Employers</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-creates-right-use-corporate-e-mail-organize-and-complain-about-work-ten</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000002088079Medium_laptop_boardroom_sky.jpg?1418656223&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a precedent-setting ruling, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the &amp;quot;Board&amp;quot;) held last week in &lt;em&gt;Purple Communications&lt;/em&gt; that Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) requires employers, except in very limited circumstances, to open their corporate e-mail systems to union organizing by employees and to group discussions among employees about the terms and conditions of employment during non-work time.&amp;nbsp; The 3-to-2 decision overturns the Board&amp;#39;s December 2007 decision in &lt;em&gt;Register Guard&lt;/em&gt;, holding that because a corporate e-mail system is t&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-creates-right-use-corporate-e-mail-organize-and-complain-about-work-ten&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133616 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Issues its &quot;Ambush&quot; Election Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-issues-its-ambush-election-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;112&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_62154526_vote_anonymous_2.jpg?1418400769&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As expected, the National Labor Relations Board released its much-anticipated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2014-28777_PI.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;final rule&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; amending union representation and election procedures.&amp;nbsp; The rule is scheduled to be formally published in the &lt;em&gt;Federal Register &lt;/em&gt;on December 15, and therefore take effect on April 14, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among other changes, the rule will:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-issues-its-ambush-election-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133506 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Says Employees Have a Right to use Employer&#039;s Email for Section 7 Activity under Certain Circumstances</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-says-employees-have-right-use-employers-email-section-7-activity-under-</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;113&quot; height=&quot;170&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/hand%20on%20mouse_0.jpg?1418317679&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a 3-2 split decision along party lines, the National Labor Relations Board has held that employees are presumptively permitted to use their employer&amp;#39;s email systems during non-work time for Section 7 activities if employers give employees access to their email systems.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-says-employees-have-right-use-employers-email-section-7-activity-under-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133476 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Senate Confirms NLRB Member</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/senate-confirms-nlrb-member</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;124&quot; height=&quot;119&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/stamp3_1.JPG?1418083911&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a late afternoon vote, the Senate on Monday confirmed the nomination of Lauren McFerran to serve as member of the National Labor Relations Board.&amp;nbsp; The final tally was 54-40 along party lines. McFerran &amp;ndash; who will replace outgoing member Nancy Schiffer &amp;ndash; will remain a member of the Board until December 16, 2019.&amp;nbsp;Continue reading this entry at Littler&amp;#39;s &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/workplace-policy-update/senate-confirms-nlrb-member&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Workplace Policy Update&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133361 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Senate HELP Committee Considers NLRB Nomination</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/senate-help-committee-considers-nlrb-nomination</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000010230298Medium_capitol_1.jpg?1416508538&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During a relatively sedate hearing to consider the nomination of Lauren McFerran to serve as a member of the National Labor Relations Board, the issue of joint employment and franchisor liability took center stage, at least for the Republican members of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/senate-help-committee-considers-nlrb-nomination&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132956 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Board Awards Unprecedented Remedies and Signals It Could Go Further</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-awards-unprecedented-remedies-and-signals-it-could-go-further</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/gavel_coming_down_motion_0.jpg?1416435625&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/suellen-oswald&quot;&gt;Suellen  Oswald &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Labor Relations Board&amp;rsquo;s decision in &lt;em&gt;HTH Corporation&lt;/em&gt;, 361 NLRB No. 65 (2014), re-affirms the Board&amp;rsquo;s intent to impose aggressive, unprecedented remedies.&amp;nbsp; In this case, the Board openly signaled that it has not yet reached the outer limits of its authority, and is prepared to go even further.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-awards-unprecedented-remedies-and-signals-it-could-go-further&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132846 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Board Deems Employees&#039; Lengthy and Detailed Social Media Comments Unprotected</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-deems-employees-lengthy-and-detailed-social-media-comments-unprotected</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000013571623XSmaller_social_media_people_connect_0.jpg?1416335558&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/suellen-oswald&quot;&gt;Suellen  Oswald &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After years of NLRB decisions protecting employees&amp;rsquo; profanity-laced tirades and outright threats against management in social media stream-of-consciousness posts, the Board recently said &amp;ldquo;no.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; In &lt;em&gt;Richmond District Neighborhood Center&lt;/em&gt;, 361 NLRB No. 74 (2014), the NLRB upheld the ALJ&amp;rsquo;s decision that two employees&amp;rsquo; Facebook plan for insubordination veered into the land of &amp;ldquo;unprotected&amp;rdquo; activity under the NLRA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-deems-employees-lengthy-and-detailed-social-media-comments-unprotected&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132701 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>HELP Committee to Consider New NLRB Nominee Next Week</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/help-committee-consider-new-nlrb-nominee-next-week</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;240&quot; height=&quot;180&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Target%20Date_1.jpg?1415904083&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an effort to expedite confirmation of Lauren McFerran to serve as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/hearing/?id=a27e64e1-5056-a032-52e9-c5e1ebacdd48&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;scheduled a full committee hearing&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; for next Thursday, November 20 to discuss her candidacy.&amp;nbsp;In a surprise move, on November 12 President Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/12/presidential-nominations-and-withdrawal-sent-senate&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;wi&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/help-committee-consider-new-nlrb-nominee-next-week&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132576 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>President Reportedly Withdraws Sharon Block&#039;s NLRB Nomination</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/president-reportedly-withdraws-sharon-blocks-nlrb-nomination</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;85&quot; height=&quot;128&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/pencil%20erasing2_3.JPG?1415838225&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps sensing former recess appointee Sharon Block&amp;#39;s confirmation to the National Labor Relations Board would be an uphill battle, President Obama has reportedly announced that he is withdrawing her nomination. In her stead, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/nlrb-sharon-block-lauren-mcferran-112833.html?hp=l2_4&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;reported&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by Edward-Isaac Dovere of &lt;em&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt;, the President will name Lauren McFerran, chief labor counsel for the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, as his choice to be the fifth Board member.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/president-reportedly-withdraws-sharon-blocks-nlrb-nomination&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132546 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Reaffirms D.R. Horton Decision Invalidating Arbitral Class Action Waivers</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-reaffirms-dr-horton-decision-invalidating-arbitral-class-action-waivers</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;147&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000015127071Small_check_mark_blue_0.jpg?1415737546&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a controversial decision that rejects the precedent of numerous federal and state courts, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has reaffirmed its earlier decision in &lt;em&gt;D.R. Horton&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Inc.,&lt;/em&gt; 357 NLRB No. 184 (2012).&amp;nbsp; In &lt;em&gt;D.R.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-reaffirms-dr-horton-decision-invalidating-arbitral-class-action-waivers&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132466 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB General Counsel Acknowledges Legal Stumbling Block in Joint Employment Issue, Highlights Priorities</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-acknowledges-legal-stumbling-block-joint-employment-iss</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;180&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Richard%20Griffin_7.jpg?1414605399&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wvulaw.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Play/31e143f0990647558b0268e9086ca3e41d?catalog=7e011120-398b-494f-8ce8-9e0aa870d371&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Speaking&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at a West Virginia University College of Law event last week, National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Richard F. Griffin, Jr. pointed out the pitfalls in his office&amp;#39;s argument that franchisors should be named in unfair labor practice charge complaints as joint employers with their franchisees.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-acknowledges-legal-stumbling-block-joint-employment-iss&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132076 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Board Holds off on Major E-mail Use Pronouncement . . . For Now</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-holds-major-e-mail-use-pronouncement-now</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000006530447Small_office_desks_work_station_empty.jpg?1412635013&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/noah-g-lipschultz&quot;&gt;Noah G. Lipschultz &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In its long-awaited &lt;em&gt;Purple Communications&lt;/em&gt; decision, on September 24, 2014, the NLRB reserved judgment on the most anticipated issue in the case: the legality of the employer&amp;rsquo;s electronic communications policy prohibiting use of e-mail for any nonbusiness reason, and the continuing validity of the NLRB&amp;rsquo;s 2007 &lt;em&gt;Register Guard&lt;/em&gt; decision.&amp;nbsp; The Board had previously invited briefing from both the parties and amicus regarding whether to overrule or modify &lt;em&gt;Register Guard&lt;/em&gt;, and it was anticipated the Board would address that issue in the &lt;em&gt;Purple Communicat&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-holds-major-e-mail-use-pronouncement-now&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">130961 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>California Hospital Ordered to Pay Union&#039;s Negotiating Costs</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/california-hospital-ordered-pay-unions-negotiating-costs</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;160&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Health%20Care%20Cost4.JPG?1410954697&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mynlrb.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d458187654b&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;decision&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; highlighting the importance of bargaining in good faith, the National Labor Relations Board recently held that a California Hospital must reimburse the union&amp;rsquo;s negotiating costs as a remedy for the hospital&amp;rsquo;s post-election misconduct.&amp;nbsp; NLRB Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce and Members Kent Y. Hirozawa and Harry I. Johnson adopted and expanded the Administrative Law Judge&amp;rsquo;s (ALJ) decision holding that Hospital of Barstow, Inc.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/california-hospital-ordered-pay-unions-negotiating-costs&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">130341 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Senate Considers Nomination of Sharon Block to the NLRB</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/senate-considers-nomination-sharon-block-nlrb</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;146&quot; height=&quot;110&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Capitol%20Building_7.jpg?1410281415&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A day after the Senate returned from its summer recess, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing to discuss the nomination of former recess appointee Sharon Block to be a member of the National Labor Relations Board. President Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/workplace-policy-update/president-obama-re-nominates-recess-appointee-nlrb-0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;announced his intent&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to re-nominate Block to the Board on July 10, 2014.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/senate-considers-nomination-sharon-block-nlrb&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">129951 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Unions Encourage Other Industry Sectors to Join Massive Fast Food Protest</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/unions-encourage-other-industry-sectors-join-massive-fast-food-protest</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Strike_0.jpg?1409863834&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/workplace-policy-update/fast-food-workers-plan-another-round-coordinated-protests-week&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;expected&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, individuals in several U.S.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/unions-encourage-other-industry-sectors-join-massive-fast-food-protest&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">129736 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Fast Food Workers Plan Another Round of Coordinated Protests this Week</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/fast-food-workers-plan-another-round-coordinated-protests-week</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;98&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000001280547Small_protest_signs_0.jpg?1409669658&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers at fast food chains around the nation should brace themselves for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://strikefastfood.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;series of protests&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and acts of civil disobedience that will occur this Thursday, September 4.&amp;nbsp; The strikes, organized by members of the &amp;quot;Fight for 15&amp;quot; movement, are part of the nationwide crusade to raise the minimum wage. The Fight for 15 organization carried out a similar campaign to raise wages last spring.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/fast-food-workers-plan-another-round-coordinated-protests-week&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">129526 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Addresses the Collective &quot;We&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-addresses-collective-we</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;118&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/email_button.jpg?1409256360&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/denise-barton-ward&quot;&gt;Denise  Barton Ward &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In applying a standard &lt;em&gt;Wright Line &lt;/em&gt;analysis of whether employee activity constitutes conduct protected by Section 7 of the NLRA, the Board, in &lt;em&gt;Hitachi Capital America Corp. and Virginia Kish&lt;/em&gt;, 361 NLRB No.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-addresses-collective-we&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">129456 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Expands Reach of NLRA by Finding Employee Who Sought Help From Coworkers For Her Sex Harassment Complaint Was Protected</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-expands-reach-nlra-finding-employee-who-sought-help-coworkers-her-sex-h</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000018330412Small_gossip_harassment.jpg?1408485621&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In yet another case that impacts both union and non-union employers, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently found that an employee who asked coworkers for assistance in preserving evidence for a sex harassment complaint she planned to raise with her employer was engaged in &amp;quot;concerted activities&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;mutual aid and protection&amp;quot; under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Fresh &amp;amp; Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 361 NLRB No. 12 (Aug. 11, 2014).&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-expands-reach-nlra-finding-employee-who-sought-help-coworkers-her-sex-h&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">129086 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Right to Union Representation Applies to Employer Referrals for Drug/Alcohol Tests NLRB Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/right-union-representation-applies-employer-referrals-drugalcohol-tests-nlrb</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000010782075Medium_test_tube_drop.jpg?1407255695&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/dale-l-deitchler&quot;&gt;Dale L. Deitchler &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Labor Relations Board, in its July 31, 2014 decision in &lt;em&gt;Ralph&amp;rsquo;s Grocery Co.&lt;/em&gt;, 361 N.L.R.B. No.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/right-union-representation-applies-employer-referrals-drugalcohol-tests-nlrb&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">128521 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB General Counsel Takes Aim at Franchises</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-takes-aim-franchises</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;170&quot; height=&quot;113&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/sharing%20briefcase_1.jpg?1406679024&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a move that could have a dramatic impact on the franchise business model, National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Richard Griffin has &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/nlrb-office-general-counsel-authorizes-complaints-against-mcdonalds&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;announced&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that his office intends to name a parent franchisor as a respondent in cases involving alleged unfair labor practices committed by franchisees if the parties are unable to reach a settlement.&amp;nbsp; According to the Board, the agency is currently investigating the various cha&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-takes-aim-franchises&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">128361 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>President Obama Re-Nominates Recess Appointee to the NLRB</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/president-obama-re-nominates-recess-appointee-nlrb</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;140&quot; height=&quot;210&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Sharon%20Block_0.jpg?1405111299&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two weeks after the U.S.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/president-obama-re-nominates-recess-appointee-nlrb&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">127531 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB General Counsel Outlines Priorities, Provides Noel Canning Update During Webinar</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-outlines-priorities-provides-noel-canning-update-during</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;180&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Richard%20Griffin_5.jpg?1404939558&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Richard Griffin discussed various steps the Board is taking in light of the &lt;em&gt;Noel Canning&lt;/em&gt; decision, as well as his office&amp;rsquo;s priorities during a July 9 webinar sponsored by the American Bar Association.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-outlines-priorities-provides-noel-canning-update-during&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">127436 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Supreme Court Invalidates NLRB Recess Appointments</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/supreme-court-invalidates-nlrb-recess-appointments</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;131&quot; height=&quot;98&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20facade_0.jpg?1404262132&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in &lt;em&gt;Noel Canning v. NLRB&lt;/em&gt;. Affirming the D.C. Circuit&amp;#39;s January 2013 ruling in favor of beverage distributor Noel Canning, the Court held that President Obama&amp;#39;s January 2012 recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were unconstitutional because the Congressional recess was of insufficient length.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/supreme-court-invalidates-nlrb-recess-appointments&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">127111 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Supreme Court Rules Against Public Sector Union in Limited Decision</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/supreme-court-rules-against-public-sector-union-limited-decision</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;155&quot; height=&quot;155&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/U.S.SupremeCourt_1.jpg?1404151456&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday delivered a limited blow to public sector unions.&amp;nbsp; In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-681_j426.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Harris v. Quinn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that compulsory union agency fees imposed on Illinois home care workers violate the First Amendment.&amp;nbsp; However, the Court held back from issuing a more expansive ruling that could have sounded the death knell for public sector unionism as a whole.&amp;nbsp; Specifically, the Court did not overrule its 1977 decision in &lt;em&gt;Abood v. Detroit Bd.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/supreme-court-rules-against-public-sector-union-limited-decision&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">127031 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>House Subcommittee Discusses Pending National Labor Relations Board Issues</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/house-subcommittee-discusses-pending-national-labor-relations-board-issues</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;99&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000006167953Small_capitol_3.jpg?1403647875&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court is just days away from releasing its recess appointment opinion in &lt;em&gt;Noel Canning,&lt;/em&gt; which will determine whether the National Labor Relations Board will have to revisit and re-decide &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chamberlitigation.com/recess-appointments-litigation-resource-page&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;thousands of decisions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. The validity of President Obama&amp;rsquo;s recess appointments to the NLRB, however, is not the only labor-related issue employers are watching.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/house-subcommittee-discusses-pending-national-labor-relations-board-issues&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">126786 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>The New Normal: Employee&#039;s Profane, Insubordinate Outburst Is Protected Activity According to the NLRB</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/new-normal-employees-profane-insubordinate-outburst-protected-activity-accor</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;123&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Getty_71416651_office_bully_small.jpg?1403209572&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/kyllan-b-kershaw&quot;&gt;Kyllan B. Kershaw &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On remand from the Ninth Circuit, the National Labor Relations Board held for the second time that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act&amp;nbsp; by terminating an employee who engaged in a profane and insubordinate outburst.&amp;nbsp; The Board required the employer to reinstate the employee with back pay and benefits.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Plaza Auto Center, Inc. and Nick Aguirre&lt;/em&gt;, 360 NLRB No. 117 (May 28, 2014).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/new-normal-employees-profane-insubordinate-outburst-protected-activity-accor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">126596 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Board Strikes Down Non-Solicitation Policy and Finds that Employee Instant Messages About Job Security Are Protected Activity</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-strikes-down-non-solicitation-policy-and-finds-employee-instant-messag</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;135&quot; height=&quot;203&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_58116421Smallest_smart_phone_at_work.jpg?1403103562&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/kyllan-b-kershaw&quot;&gt;Kyllan B. Kershaw &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;em&gt;Food Services of America, Inc.&lt;/em&gt;, 360 NLRB No. 123 (May 30, 2014), a Board panel majority (Hirozawa, Schiffer) struck down an employer&amp;rsquo;s solicitation policy and concluded that instant messages between two employees involving job security are protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The employer&amp;rsquo;s solicitation policy provided that:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-strikes-down-non-solicitation-policy-and-finds-employee-instant-messag&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">126561 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Board Upholds Firing of Employee for Violating Overbroad and Unlawful Confidentiality Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-upholds-firing-employee-violating-overbroad-and-unlawful-confidentiali</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_83109643_dont_talk_silenced.jpg?1403104519&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/kyllan-b-kershaw&quot;&gt;Kyllan B. Kershaw &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NLRB recently held that an employer lawfully terminated an employee for intentionally violating an overbroad and unlawful confidentiality rule.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Flex Frac Logistics&lt;/em&gt;, 360 NLRB No. 120 (May 30, 2014).&amp;nbsp; While the Board&amp;rsquo;s decision is a welcome change of pace, the result is very fact-specific.&amp;nbsp; The employer makes deliveries to energy companies for oil and gas drilling, using both directly-employed drivers and contractor-trucking companies.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/board-upholds-firing-employee-violating-overbroad-and-unlawful-confidentiali&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">126566 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Littler Shareholders Maury Baskin and Michael Lotito Testify at NLRB Public Meeting</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/littler-shareholders-maury-baskin-and-michael-lotito-testify-nlrb-public-mee</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_55310137_speaker_presentation_conference_3.jpg?1397238168&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly 50 speakers have or are slated to testify during the National Labor Relations Board&amp;rsquo;s 2-day public meeting on the proposed expedited or &amp;ldquo;ambush&amp;rdquo; election rule.&amp;nbsp;The Board sought input on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nlrb.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/basic-page/node-3317/Public%20Meeting%20speaker%20schedule%204-7%20_2__1.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;approximately 20 different issues&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; stemming from the proposed rule, which would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/non-union-employers-beware-nlrb-re-issues-its-proposed-ru&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/littler-shareholders-maury-baskin-and-michael-lotito-testify-nlrb-public-mee&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123906 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Recent Board Cases Reach Different Results in Review of Employer Work Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/recent-board-cases-reach-different-results-review-employer-work-rules</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000012880248Small_ethics.jpg?1397144870&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/gregory-brown&quot;&gt;Gregory A. Brown &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A trio of recent cases highlights the National Labor Relations Board&amp;rsquo;s current focus on employer work rules and conduct policies.&amp;nbsp; Under Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, workplace rules that &amp;ldquo;explicitly restrict&amp;rdquo; an employee&amp;rsquo;s exercise of protected concerted activity are unlawful.&amp;nbsp; Even workplace rules that do not explicitly limit employees&amp;rsquo; rights may be illegal if employees reasonably would understand the rules to prohibit such activity.&amp;nbsp; The NLRB&amp;rsquo;s two-member Republican minority and its three-member Democrat majority &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/recent-board-cases-reach-different-results-review-employer-work-rules&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123796 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>House Committee Advances Bills Seeking to Block NLRB Election Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/house-committee-advances-bills-seeking-block-nlrb-election-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;99&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000006167953Small_capitol_1.jpg?1397154205&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During a Wednesday markup session, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce voted along party lines in favor of sending to the House floor two bills that would effectively prevent the National Labor Relations Board from moving forward with its proposed expedited or &amp;ldquo;ambush&amp;rdquo; election rule in its current form.&amp;nbsp; According to Chairman John Kline (R-MN), the two bills &amp;ldquo;provide an appropriate government response&amp;rdquo; to the Board&amp;rsquo;s proposed rule.&amp;nbsp;Continue reading this entry at Littler&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/workplace-policy-update/house&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/house-committee-advances-bills-seeking-block-nlrb-election-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123851 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Clarifies Lawful Weingarten Representation Activity and Permissibility of Unilaterally Requiring Interviewees to Attest to the Veracity of Investigatory Interview Notes</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-clarifies-lawful-weingarten-representation-activity-and-permissibility-</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;170&quot; height=&quot;113&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/statement2_0.JPG?1396984634&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/stephanie-gail-lee&quot;&gt;Stephanie Gail Lee &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 25, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board affirmed the Administrative Law Judge&amp;rsquo;s ruling that an employer violated various sections of the National Labor Relations Act by engaging in retaliatory acts against an employee for his conduct in representing a coworker at an investigatory interview, and by unilaterally adopting a requirement that employees certify the veracity of investigative interview notes. &lt;em&gt;Murtis Taylor Human Services Systems&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;, &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mynlrb.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d4581634e7d&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;360 NLRB No.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-clarifies-lawful-weingarten-representation-activity-and-permissibility-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123711 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Legislation would Effectively Prevent NLRB&#039;s Representation Election Rule From Moving Forward</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/legislation-would-effectively-prevent-nlrbs-representation-election-rule-mov</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_78856576_ballot_box_voting_4.jpg?1395951921&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a preemptive strike against a final &amp;ldquo;ambush&amp;rdquo; representation election rule, Republican lawmakers in both chambers introduced legislation that would blunt its intended effects.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/legislation-would-effectively-prevent-nlrbs-representation-election-rule-mov&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123276 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB General Counsel Maps Out Key Policy Initiatives</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-maps-out-key-policy-initiatives</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;128&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/checklist.jpg?1394547265&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/jeffrey-m-place&quot;&gt;Jeffrey M. Place &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week, NLRB General Counsel Richard Griffin issued a memorandum to the National Labor Relations Board&amp;rsquo;s Regional Directors, outlining legal issues that the Regions cannot address without first submitting to the Board&amp;rsquo;s Division of Advice in Washington, DC.&amp;nbsp; The memorandum includes a lengthy list of issues Griffin considers &amp;ldquo;difficult&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;rare,&amp;rdquo; where the law is &amp;ldquo;in flux,&amp;rdquo; or where issues have &amp;ldquo;traditionally&amp;rdquo; been submitted to Advice.&amp;nbsp; According to Griffin, these types of matters must undergo a centralized review proc&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-general-counsel-maps-out-key-policy-initiatives&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122456 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>DOL Delays Release of Final Persuader Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/dol-delays-release-final-persuader-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;128&quot; height=&quot;85&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Delayed2.JPG?1394220671&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps&amp;nbsp;due to the increased scrutiny business advocacy groups have placed on the implications of the DOL&amp;rsquo;s anticipated revisions to the&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;persuader&amp;rdquo; regulations, the agency has said it is once again delaying the final rule&amp;rsquo;s release.&amp;nbsp; Initially slated for a November 2013 publication, the rule that would broaden the scope of an employer&amp;rsquo;s reportable activities by substantially narrowing the &amp;quot;advice exemption&amp;quot; in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) was subsequently re-set for a March 2014 unveiling,&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/dol-delays-release-final-persuader-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122376 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>House Committee Holds Hearing on Ambush Election Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/house-committee-holds-hearing-ambush-election-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;112&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_62154526_vote_anonymous_0.jpg?1394057629&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employee privacy and employer due process concerns were the focal point of Wednesday&amp;rsquo;s House Committee hearing on the National Labor Relations Board&amp;rsquo;s proposed expedited election rule. &amp;nbsp;Last month, the Board &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/non-union-employers-beware-nlrb-re-issues-its-proposed-rulemaking-fost&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;re-issued an expansive proposal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that would dramatically alter how union elections are conducted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/house-committee-holds-hearing-ambush-election-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122296 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Schedules Public Meetings to Discuss Proposed Expedited Election Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-schedules-public-meetings-discuss-proposed-expedited-election-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_55310137_speaker_presentation_conference_1.jpg?1393348241&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Labor Relations Board has scheduled at least two public meetings to address the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/dc-employment-law-update/nlrb-re-issues-expansive-proposed-representation-election-procedures-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;controversial re-proposal of a rule&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that would make significant amendments to the union representation election process.&amp;nbsp;After the so-called &amp;ldquo;ambush&amp;rdquo; election rule was first proposed in June 2011, the NLRB &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/blog/labor-relations-counsel?q=union-organizing-corporate-campaigns/speak&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-schedules-public-meetings-discuss-proposed-expedited-election-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122046 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Re-Issues Expansive Proposed Representation Election Procedures Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-re-issues-expansive-proposed-representation-election-procedures-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_78856576_ballot_box_voting_0.jpg?1391620352&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As expected, the National Labor Relations Board has re-issued its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2014-02128_PI.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;proposed rule&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that would dramatically change and expedite the union representation election process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/national-labor-relations-board-proposes-amendments-improve-representation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;According to the Board&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the proposed changes to the process &amp;ldquo;are identical to the representation procedure changes first proposed in June&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-re-issues-expansive-proposed-representation-election-procedures-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">121366 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>BLS Report Indicates Slight Increase in Private Sector Unionization</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/bls-report-indicates-slight-increase-private-sector-unionization</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;114&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_44515690_arrows_moving_up_0.jpg?1390839604&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the overall percentage of union membership in the U.S. workforce remained unchanged at 11.3% in 2013, there was a slight increase in the number of unionized workers in the private sector for the first time since 2009, according to the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) annual report&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. On the whole, 16 million U.S.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/bls-report-indicates-slight-increase-private-sector-unionization&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">120436 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Supreme Court Expressed Skepticism Regarding Validity of President Obama&#039;s NLRB Recess Appointments</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/supreme-court-expressed-skepticism-regarding-validity-president-obamas-nlrb-</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_2301627_SupremeCourt_small.jpg?1389734704&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/michael-j-lotito&quot;&gt;Michael J.  Lotito &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/ilyse-wolens-schuman&quot;&gt;Ilyse Wolens Schuman &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During Monday&amp;rsquo;s oral arguments of the closely watched case &lt;em&gt;NLRB v. Noel Canning&lt;/em&gt;, several members of the Supreme Court &amp;ndash; including those considered the most liberal &amp;ndash; took issue with the government&amp;rsquo;s legal justifications in support of President Obama&amp;rsquo;s January 4, 2012 recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.&amp;nbsp; On January 25, 2013, the D.C.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/supreme-court-expressed-skepticism-regarding-validity-president-obamas-nlrb-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">119766 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB&#039;s Notice Posting Rule Effectively Void, But Employers Should Anticipate Renewed Rulemaking Efforts</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrbs-notice-posting-rule-effectively-void-employers-should-anticipate-renew</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/GettyImages_95465964Small_gavels_on_book_0.jpg?1388786593&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Labor Relations Board&amp;rsquo;s legal attempt to revive its notice posting rule issued in August 2011 has run its course.&amp;nbsp; The rule &amp;ndash; &lt;em&gt;Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act&lt;/em&gt; &amp;ndash; would have required employers to conspicuously display a notice informing employees of their rights under the NLRA.&amp;nbsp; In May 2013, in &lt;em&gt;National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. NLRB&lt;/em&gt;, the U.S Court of Appeals for the D.C.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrbs-notice-posting-rule-effectively-void-employers-should-anticipate-renew&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">119216 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NLRB Dismisses Appeal, Opening Door to Re-Issued Election Rule</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-dismisses-appeal-opening-door-re-issued-election-rule</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/shutterstock_80316826_small_boomerang_0.jpg?1386707826&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Monday, the NLRB &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/Stipulation_of_Voluntary_Dismissal[1].pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;voluntarily dismissed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; its appeal in &lt;em&gt;Chamber Of Commerce v. NLRB&lt;/em&gt;, the case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found the Board&amp;rsquo;s expedited representation election rule invalid because the Board lacked a quorum when it issued the rule in December 2011.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nlrb-dismisses-appeal-opening-door-re-issued-election-rule&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">118406 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>NYU and UAW Agree to Union Election for Graduate Students</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nyu-and-uaw-agree-union-election-graduate-students</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/iStock_000009827310Small_graduates_caps_gowns_graduation.jpg?1385567456&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-nodereference field-field-author&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a href=&quot;/people/walter-c-hunter&quot;&gt;Walter C. Hunter &lt;/a&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NYU and the UAW have reached an agreement to pave the way for an election among covered graduate students at NYU and NYU-Poly to determine whether the graduate students will be represented as a bargaining unit by the UAW.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/nyu-and-uaw-agree-union-election-graduate-students&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">117676 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>ALJ Holds Employers Can Ban &quot;Gotcha&quot; Audio Recordings From The Workplace</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/alj-holds-employers-can-ban-gotcha-audio-recordings-workplace</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;136&quot; height=&quot;204&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Smart%20Phone_0.jpg?1383750386&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With audio recording applications (&amp;ldquo;apps&amp;rdquo;) often standard issue on ubiquitous smart phones, employees are now armed with a relatively inconspicuous way to capture their supervisor&amp;rsquo;s every gaffe.&amp;nbsp; In September, a $280,000 jury verdict in favor of an employee on race and sex discrimination claims demonstrated just how damaging an audio recording can be in employment litigation.&amp;nbsp; In that case, the plaintiff, who is African American, caught her supervisor, who is Hispanic, using the &amp;ldquo;N&amp;rdquo; word on tape, and the judge admitted the recording into evidence.&amp;nbs&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/alj-holds-employers-can-ban-gotcha-audio-recordings-workplace&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116571 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>

  <item>

    <title>Griffin Nomination Clears Procedural Hurdle</title>
    <link>http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/griffin-nomination-clears-procedural-hurdle</link>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-thumbnail&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;173&quot; height=&quot;115&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.littler.com/files/blogs/thumbs/Senate_in_session_0.jpg?1383078741&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update: The Senate voted 55-44 to confirm the nomination of Richard Griffin, Jr.&amp;nbsp;to be the next NLRB General Counsel.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.littler.com/labor-relations-counsel/griffin-nomination-clears-procedural-hurdle&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116096 at http://www.littler.com</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>