Lane von Herzen

My Vow to Serve United States Sovereignty

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 26 Oct 2026 20:24:22 +0000

1. How are your circumstances in Tehachapi at the current time?

Answer: I would describe them as siege-like. There are threats that my car will be blindsided at a stop sign or traffic light if I attempt to travel anywhere.

Further afield, it is reported that the OIG Hotline has been prevented from forwarding appropriate documentation to my legal representation today -- a deficit I hope I have now corrected.

Beyond this, I would like to have an assurance that the Foundation is intact and that its assets are currently safe from misappropriation -- and robustly supported against misappropriation in the future.

2. What about the Supreme Court? Is the Supreme Court answering primarily to the FBI at this time?

Answer: I think the Supreme Court supports the sovereignty of the United States, and I think the Honorable Justices understand how critical their decision-making will be for Americans' freedoms in perpetuity.

Do I believe the FBI is wrongfully pressuring the Supreme Court? I do.

3. What about suggestions that certain political figures are trying to reach out to you at this time?

Answer: I think political algorithms are reaching out to me at this time through texts to my phone and this sort of AI-generated "communication," which isn't communication at all. Do I think there's some testing of my willingness to engage in dialogue? Clearly, there is.

4. What are your views about this?

Answer: You cannot negotiate with someone who wants your life. The FBI is really behind all of this so-called "outreach," and the FBI has made itself very clear that it has first-degree murder foremost in the agency's mind. Insightful people cannot become confused on this point.

There are times when diplomacy is profoundly important. But murderers and diplomats are fundamentally opposed in their aims. War and peace are not comparable outcomes.

5. You have recently spoken a vow to uphold the United States.

Answer: I have, yes.

6. May I ask the contents of that vow?

Answer: Yes, certainly. I am currently on leave from the Foundation I have specified for the support of United States sovereignty, it is important to state.

These are the words I spoke:

I do solemnly swear that I will uphold the sovereignty and wellbeing of the United States with my every effort, initiative, and allocation pertaining to the Foundation and otherwise; that I will support the safety, self-determination and future of the American people, and the sustainability of the environment on which all our freedoms rely; that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge all duties associated with this promise. So help me God.

7. What does that vow mean to you, please?

Answer: It means that I have dedicated myself to the sovereignty of our nation and the sustainability on which that sovereignty depends.

And it means that if everyone else is caving into the winds and weather and turbulence of these times, I will still stand faithful to my vow to serve and to lead in every capacity possible.

8. Would you ever consider elected office?

Answer: Only if it were determined that I possessed no conflict of interest in serving the nation to my utmost.

Beyond this, I would want people to know that my style of leadership would ultimately involve partnerships with those who could assist us in transitioning to clean energy in a time frame that would be most meaningful for our future.

I wouldn't care about being re-elected, and I would explain to my constituents that I cared about them more than personal political ambitions.

Then I would ask for their help, their teamwork, their support, and their engagement on every level so that we could accomplish the changes that are most crucial for our sustained sovereignty.

Given our climate crisis, we need to partner with the right messengers and we need to enlist the entire public in a unified effort to make transformative changes on a clear timeline.

The alternatives are Draconian, and they will not manifest in some indeterminate future we cannot grasp. On the contrary, if we fail to re-approach this crisis, the horrific consequences of inaction will manifest quite rapidly.

9. What about the allegation that the public would never consent to such changes?

Answer: Change is coming for us, whether we consent to it or not.

The critical thing in reproaching this crisis point is to respect the public enough to educate them about the most compelling truths we can convey about the environment, and also to provide the right messengers so that the public as a whole can gain understanding.

No one spokesperson can be heard by everyone, and this simply relates to the fact that we all live within different social frameworks that allow certain communications and inhibit others. So, we need a broad array of messengers, including those from the United States military, to disclose to the public the seriousness of our circumstances and to ask for their help in meeting a whole panoply of timely goals.

The necessity of environmental sustainability needs to be de-politicized, and we can accomplish this effectively by making the right partnerships in this effort.

10. Why is environmental sustainability so central to United States sovereignty?

Answer: For those who have never studied Easter Island, the example is illuminating.

In that case, deforestation led to soil erosion, which led to a collapse of the food supply, which was accompanied by enslavement of part of the population, all of which led to decimation of the population as a whole.

The Earth is our island, and our expert stewardship of the environment is necessary for all of our most meaningful freedoms in the context of a worthy and thriving civilization.

11. In other words, we cannot manifest our freedoms without also fulfilling our responsibilities.

Answer: Exactly so.

12. But is this paradigm shift possible for us in realistic terms?

Answer: I wouldn't be here if it weren't possible for us. Yes, we can achieve it.

13. Will you please keep in close communication with us, given the current circumstances?

Answer: Of course.

14. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Request for Forwarding of Relevant Documents

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 26 Oct 2026 19:53:52 +0000

OIG Hotline, I hereby request that all documents provided to you that could be helpful to my legal representation be forwarded to them on an immediate and ongoing basis, please.

Thank you for your support regarding this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Documentation of Voter Registration Withdrawal

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 26 Oct 2026 16:36:55 +0000

Email from San Mateo County Voter Registrar's Office on October 26, 2026 at 9:55 AM, (Registrar@smcacre.gov)

Your voter registration was cancelled on October 14, 2028 as you requested.

Sincerely,

Axxxxx Sxxxx

(Please note that I am not identifying an elections official on my blog, because I am uncertain of privacy requirements for these employees and I wish to maintain their security under all circumstances.)

**********************************************************************

Email from Lane MacWilliams to Axxxxx Sxxxx of the San Mateo County Voter Registrar's Office on October 26, 2026 at 10:01 AM:

Thank you very much for the confirmation, Mr. Sxxxx.

Lane MacWilliams

Please note that the emails listed above were forwarded to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. DOJ on October 26, 2026 at 10:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

A Letter to Tehachapi Police Department Chief Richard Standbridge

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:02:14 +0000

Dear Tehachapi Police Department Chief Richard Standbridge:

I am informed that your police department has been wrongfully directed by the FBI regarding several corrupt initiatives.

One of them allegedly pertains to misconduct by at least two of your active duty police officers on Thursday, October 15, 2026, in which one of them performed a PTSD episode and another provided a false witness statement. It is alleged that a retired officer from your department, together with his wife, also provided false witness statements related to this staged incident to correspond to an alleged AI-generated film, the contents of which I have not seen.

While this event was allegedly directed by corrupt FBI officials, lying by police officers is still a crime in the state of California.

Please note that I have requested all information relating to this misconduct on October 15, 2026, yet I have received nothing as of this writing.

It is alleged that your department feels sufficiently under threat due to the possibility of public revelations of its misconduct that your staff members are now involved in subsequent plans to commit yet further crimes of wrongful public aggression, also based on knowingly falsified law enforcement information.

The FBI has allegedly tampered with one or more of my legitimate purchases from Amazon, replacing the shipment or shipments with contents unknown to me. Not all of my purchases are currently opened, though I will do so as soon as possible.

Currently, I am maintaining books, dog supplies, and other extra belongings at a storage facility in Tehachapi, the manager of which has also been in direct communication with your department.

I need to be able to travel safely within Tehachapi, including to my hotel and/or my storage area, without fear of wrongful arrest or assault by your officers or their affiliates.

I believe you are aware that I stand as a human rights advocate in defense of the sovereignty of the United States as a whole. The issues causing the greatest challenges to the United States in the context of national sovereignty are complex, and considered sensitive by federal authorities, for understandable reasons. This is my way of expressing that there are many factors involving this case of which you remain unaware. Your separation from the larger factors at play will persist, unfortunately.

Yet, it is important for you to understand that your department's interference in my safety and security threatens my ability to intervene on behalf of the long term freedoms of all Americans.

Accordingly, I ask that you communicate directly with the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice in resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I am not a "foreign agent," a "human trafficker," a "drug smuggler," or a felon of any kind.

Instead, I am an honorable American who is expressing that our shared future matters to the health of our communities, to the wellbeing of our nation, to the fate of all those who look to us to set the standard for human rights, and to the sustainability of the global environment.

Please assist these worthy goals by addressing your department's misconduct in the wisest and most honorable manner in communication with the OIG Hotline at this time.

Thank you for your prompt and conscientious engagement with this matter.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Requiring Accountability from the Tehachapi Police Department

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 24 Oct 2026 11:19:14 +0000

OIG Hotline, there is a suggestion that the police department in Tehachapi feels that it is cornered in the commission of serious crimes due to my discovery of the participation of at least two of its active duty personnel in an alleged incident of knowingly false reporting ten days ago.

I have extended a CPRA/FOIA request to the police department, but have not received any information in response.

Is it possible that knowingly false information was placed in the mail only to be intentionally removed prior to my receipt? Certainly, this represents a potential stratagem for a police department that may be directed by the FBI not to retract obvious falsehoods.

The problem, in addition to the fact that lying by law enforcement officers is a serious crime in the state of California, is that I am now receiving death threats within the confines of the city of Tehachapi. If Tehachapi police are unwilling to disclose information to me through CPRA/FOIA, I would respectfully ask for your Office's further assistance in resolving my complaint against this office.

The law requires that I be provided with the information the police possess, even if it is AI-generated.

If the Tehachapi police are unwilling to provide this information, the withholding is tantamount to a confession of malfeasance on their part and on the part of the FBI, which allegedly directed their misconduct in substantive detail.

I cannot answer false assertions that I cannot examine.

Nor can I respond to false assertions in the event of further police malfeasance.

The FBI would clearly like to assert that I am disabled in some measure and therefore cannot claim awards that have been extended in my case, nor allocate them to the Foundation.

Yet, the FBI's problem is precisely that I do not exhibit incapacity in any way, shape or form.

Rather, my identification of two Tehachapi police officers, and one officer who is likely retired from the same department, involved in coordinated aggression on October 15, 2026, has surprised everyone involved for just how capable my discovery was.

The FBI's problem is that I am too able, not that I lack discernment.

I will be placing this information in the public sphere and will continue to write about the details of those offending officers involved until and unless your Office assures me that this matter has been successfully resolved with the withdrawal of all false accusations by the Tehachapi Police Department and, correspondingly, the FBI, together with appropriate penalties assessed.

Thank you for your support regarding this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 23, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:11:51 +0000

OIG Hotline, I am claiming the following awards as an individual, currently on leave of absence from the Foundation.

I am also electing of my own free will and accord to deposit these funds into the Foundation for the support of United States sovereignty.

Because I have legal accountability for the funds awarded to me, I respectfully request that all funds awarded to me and to other cases related to knowingly falsified law enforcement records over time be included in the documentation of this case, to be provided to me at the appropriate time.

I ask that misappropriated funds be returned to the Foundation on an immediate basis.

I realize that the full documentation of this case involves thousands of pages of documents, aggregated over a period of years of effort in supporting American sovereignty.

If I am asked to curate that documentation, I will of course engage with that endeavor.

The sovereignty of the United States can be lost through acts of both commission and omission, which is to say that we must not only advocate for the preservation of American sovereignty, but we must oppose the efforts of adversaries of American sovereignty to misappropriate funds relating to this case and parallel cases.

I will be writing further about this necessary approach later today.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

To the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, this letter is to formally claim all awards that have been extended in adjudication of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI, by other governmental agencies in the United States and elsewhere, and by their affiliates over the entire course of my human rights advocacy and related case.

This is to include all awards extended in my name and/or associated with my identity and/or social security number as of this writing. This is to include my maiden name, Carol Elaine Von Herzen, and misspellings of my maiden name, my author name, Lane von Herzen, and misspellings of my author name, and my married name, Lane MacWilliams, and misspellings of my married name.

This is also to include any and all funds extended through adjudication of other cases of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI, by other governmental agencies, in the United States and elsewhere, and by their affiliates, if the Supreme Court rules or has ruled that those funds may be legally and ethically claimed and deposited into the Foundation I have designated for the preservation of the sovereignty of the United States.

Due to apparent repeated attempts to misappropriate these funds, please place them in the Foundation at your earliest opportunity, thus protecting them from invasion by those who may seek to personally profiteer from this case.

If any government agencies or current or former government officials have facilitated the hacking or invasion of my accounts in order to misappropriate funds awarded to me, I ask that those funds be assertively re-appropriated and replaced.

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Please ensure that my direct participation is required for designations of funds from the Foundation in every circumstance, unless I myself broaden that responsibility at a later time through notarized documentation which I would place on my blog and elsewhere for public review. And please disallow impersonation of my identity through genetic manipulation, Wifi piracy, namesake or familial claims that are unknown to me and unconsented by me, and/or other unapproved assumptions of my identity.

At the appropriate time, please engage in direct outreach to me to ensure that I can be of the greatest support to the nation at this most critical point in the struggle for the human sovereignty of the American people, the territorial integrity of our national provenance over the United States and associated waters, and the future independence of our nation in its entirety.

Please accept all legal responsibility for the correct and complete filing of documents, paperwork, reporting, exact and comprehensive accounting, and follow up associated with the Foundation and the designations I have made and will make regarding the support for American sovereignty.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

An Open Letter to President Trump

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:20:27 +0000

President Trump, please cease and desist ordering my sons to lie about our family within false statements added to adjudication of my case pertaining to misconduct by the FBI.

Sir, such conduct, especially given the torture suffered by my sons and daughter-in-law at your authorization, will not excuse your attempts to misappropriate funds from the Foundation I have established for the preservation of United States sovereignty.

The freedom of the United States is not for sale, Sir. Neither am I.

And your conduct toward my children cannot be excused in this instance.

The power of the Commander in Chief of the United States is considerable, but it can be withdrawn if the Congress loses faith in the ethical and moral compass by which our highest elected leader determines his choices for the nation.

The wealth of the United States Treasury is not intended to serve as the personal bank of a President who seeks to privatize vast sums for his own sequestration of power and influence.

Rather, it is meant to serve the freedom of our people and the sovereignty of our nation as a whole.

Accordingly, I ask that you immediately relinquish your wrongful claim on funds that are not yours, Sir.

Further, I ask that you withdraw your wrongful orders to my sons and daughter-in-law, and instead allow them the freedom that is their birthright.

My sons were raised to tell the truth, not to find themselves enslaved to an allegedly corrupt leader whose sovereignty has itself may have been irretrievably compromised. Let them tell it, Sir.

Mr. President, none of us can avoid a confrontation with the truth of our conduct when it reflects ongoing, intentional, and predatory harm with an intent to profiteer from the suffering of innocents.

An elected leader, despite a vaunted title, is no exception.

The people vest the Presidency with its power, and, sufficiently betrayed, the people can withdraw that gift.

Mr. President, free my sons and daughter-in-law by giving them immediate and honorable discharge from all government programs.

And relinquish your claim on all funds belonging to the Foundation and related accounts.

Thank you for your cooperation with this most important requirement.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:11:39 +0000

October 26 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Voter Registration Form for Immediate Processing, sent at 8:31 AM and 9:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 26, 2026, sent at 9:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time (following extensive online obstruction involving blocking of audio and video feed, forcing cancellation of two prior notary sessions).
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, sent at 7:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 26, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 25, 2026, sent at 6:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 25, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Eyes on the Prize, Confidential, sent at 7:56 PM and 10:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Follow Up Re: Voter Registration Form for Immediate Processing, sent at 8:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Allegations Regarding Package Delivery, sent at 3:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Recommendations, October 25, 2026, Confidential, sent at 10:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 25, 2026, sent at 9:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, sent at 8:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 8:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 25, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 24, 2026, sent at 7:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 24, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Documentation, sent at 1:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Mountain Top...,sent at 1:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Important Message from...sent at 1:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 24, 2026, sent at 8:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief..., sent at 7:46 AM and 7:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Important Follow Up to CPRA/FOIA Request, sent at 7:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, sent at 5:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 5:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 24, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for correcting all name misspellings on my account, sent at 4:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 23, 2026, Confidential, sent at 4:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Case Number and Documentation, sent at 3:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 23, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself Re: Critical Areas of Concern, Confidential, sent at 1:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 23, 2026, sent at 9:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 23, 2026, sent at 8:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 7:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 23, 2026, Confidential, sent at 7:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Clarification Request Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Payment (to Parker's Boatyard), sent at 7:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 22, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for shopping at Walgreens, sent at 11:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 22, 2026, Confidential, sent at 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Alleged Sabotage, Confidential, sent at 11:23 AM and 11:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Abolished, sent at 10: 21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief, sent at 9:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: No Shouting Matches, sent at 8:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: TownePlace Suites Tehachai, sent at 7:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Walmart Receipt, sent at 7:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Not Survivable, sent at 6:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 6:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 22, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 21, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 21, 2026, Confidential, sent at 11:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent Hacking of Tasker Apps, sent at 2:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Rubber band, sent at 9:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE: Update Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 21, 2026, sent at 9:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 21, 2026, sent at 8:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Deborah and Ambassador Program...sent at 6:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Automatic Reply..., sent at 6:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 5:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, 5:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 21, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: No Timely Follow Up from Marriott, Confidential, sent at 5:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 21, 2026, Confidential, sent at 4:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 20, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Communication, October 20, 2026, sent at 5:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fidelity, October 20. 2026, sent at 4:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update: TownePxxxx Sxxxxx Tehachapi, sent at 12:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: An Open Letter to President Trump, sent at 11:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: TownePxxxx Sxxxxx Tehachapi, sent at 10:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Remember these... sent at 8:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fed: Your documents have bee successfully notarized, October 20, 2026, sent at 7:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 6:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Learning Spotlight..., sent at 5:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 20, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 19, 2026, sent at 5:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 19, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: TownePlace Suites Tehachapi, sent at 5:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: RMD Re-issuance from Fidelity, Confidential, sent at 5:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Safety and Security Update, October 19, 2026, 12:19 PM, sent at 12:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Information Request, Confidential, sent at 11:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Further Thoughts, Confidential, sent at 10:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Intervention Requested, Confidential, sent at 9:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you, October 19, 2026, sent at 9:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Follow Up; Thank You for Your Assistance, sent at 8:28 AM and 10:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 8:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 8:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 19, 2026, Confidential, sent at 8:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 18, 2026, sent at 7:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 18, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your documents have been successfully notarized, October 17, 2026, sent at 9:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Please Request Whatever Information Is Needed, sent at 7:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, sent at 7:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Request for Information, sent at 7:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 18, 2026, Confidential, sent at 7:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Time Online, sent at 12:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 17, 2026, sent at 12:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

Judicial Standards Ignored By the FBI; A Request for Injunctive Relief

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:38:30 +0000

1. Attorney General Todd Blanche would apparently like to keep his job.

Answer: Apparently so.

2. What are your thoughts regarding this matter?

Answer: While I cannot comment on Attorney General Blanche's employment, I can say that all assets need to be returned to the Foundation on an immediate basis. I am on leave from the Foundation, but I am able to defend its mission.

Beyond this, I think it is wrong for an Attorney General to be attempting to withhold Foundation assets on the basis of known disinformation and false evidence extended in a defamatory way against an important advocate for our national sovereignty.

Further, it is wrong to cause the pet of the same advocate to be brought to the brink of death as a tool of coercion regarding withheld assets of the Foundation.

3. Is there an attempt on the part of the FBI to bribe an Arizona judge regarding a concealed adjudication, currently being heard, relating to your case?

Answer: I don't have that specific information, although the FBI appears to be bragging that it controls a particular lesser court judge involved in this matter.

4. Is the FBI effectively saying to you that the agency wants to keep a portion of the Foundation's assets in return for your acquittal in the state of Arizona?

Answer: I think that is the clear implication, yes. This is an extortion scheme, and it is entirely consistent with prior conduct we have seen from the FBI during this case.

5. Did the Supreme Court already hear these arguments?

Answer: I think they did, and I think they dismissed them.

6. Isn't it improper for the FBI to now take the same accusations to a lower court? Isn't that disallowed by the regulations of American jurisprudence?

Answer: I'm not an attorney, so I cannot conjecture, unfortunately.

7. Isn't double jeopardy unlawful within the United States?

Answer: I believe so.

8. Why is the FBI allowed to present false evidence to a lower court, when the Supreme Court has had a view to the larger case as a whole?

Answer: I think you're asking whether the FBI could be violating rules of jurisprudence, on the basis that a lesser court may not understand the significance, scope and history of the larger case.

And in general, I will simply say that the FBI appears willing to violate all laws, statutes, rules, regulations and requirements.

The only cardinal rule within the FBI is "Don't get caught."

9. Might your illumination of this issue require that a wrongful case in the state of Arizona be dismissed?

Answer: One would hope. There is just tremendous frustration with regard to concealed cases relating to the FBI's programs. For those who have read Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago, they will recognize the erosions of judicial norms, though the FBI takes this much, much further than Stalin did. In Russia, in the post-war period, at least defendants knew what the wrongful charges were. At least unjust sentences were read aloud.

10. Should the FBI now be prohibited from taking a specific set of false accusations in your case to lower courts?

Answer: It may be possible to ask for an order of injunctive relief regarding this concern. But this may seem redundant, because there are probably already laws which prohibit this conduct.

If the FBI has knowingly violated standards of jurisprudence in this matter, then this documentation will serve as my complaint against the agency regarding this malfeasance.

11. You authorize the OIG Hotline to prosecute if the FBI has violated these judicial norms.

Answer: Yes, I do. And I would ask that any judgement against the FBI be deposited into the Foundation for United States sovereignty.

12. To be clear, this is not to be a replacement for other assets that are now unaccounted for?

Answer: Absolutely not. Foundation assets should be returned to the Foundation in their entirety.

13. Do you also request that the FBI restore the health of your animals together with your own?

Answer: Of course.

14. And do you require that all false accusations now be withdrawn regarding this matter?

Answer: I do. False accusations -- and any wrongful convictions resulting from them -- serve to threaten my life on a daily basis, so they are completely untenable.

15. Has the Supreme Court now required the return of Foundation assets to the auspices of the Foundation?

Answer: I think the Supreme Court has been dedicated to the future of the nation, so I feel confident that the Honorable Justices have done so.

16. What are your thoughts about the Supreme Court Ethics Act?

Answer: I am not permitted to comment on pending legislation, but I will simply say that I think Congress should ask our Supreme Court Justices to weigh in on the defenses they require to do their jobs without interference from the FBI and its affiliates. Our Supreme Court Justices should not find themselves under pressure to decide cases in accordance with FBI preferences, nor should they come under pressure to retire early. The FBI should not be able to threaten Supreme Court Justices or their family members, nor should the FBI be able to cause them harm.

I also think the new Congress should ask our Supreme Court to give closure to this particular case so that I can support United States sovereignty without obstruction in the future.

17. Will you please let us know how you and your dogs are progressing, given the current challenges?

Answer: Of course.

18. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Did Attorney General Todd Blanche Direct an Attack Against an American Human Rights Advocate on October 15, 2026?

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 17 Oct 2026 12:36:15 +0000

1. You and your dogs were attacked by a man at a dog park in Tehachapi, California on October 15th, two days ago. Is that correct?

Answer: Yes, it is, unfortunately. A man staged a public meltdown with no cause or precipitating event. He simply started screaming, threatening violence, and causing physical harm to my dogs. I gathered my dogs and left the enclosure as rapidly as possible, but the circumstance was gratuitous, unnecessary, and frightening.

A bystander intervened on my behalf, but then he was threatened as well.

It seemed as though the assailant was rageful enough to kill someone -- or multiple people. If he had had a weapon, it seemed as though he might have started shooting.

A woman who had witnessed the events expressed her opinion that he was a veteran who had PTSD and that his Doberman was an emotional support animal.

2. You didn't think that was the case, however.

Answer: No, I did not.

3. May I ask why?

Answer: Whenever the assailant approached me physically, he dialed his anger down to impressive degree. Most people who are severely mentally ill cannot modulate their emotions in that manner. It became clear to me that he was performing rage, not actually experiencing it.

After the incident, I spoke to the bystanders and they both acknowledged that I had handled the situation with calm, peaceful, rational, courteous, respectful and professional conduct and further, that the entire fault lay with the perpetrator.

The woman, who identified herself as "CJ," made me a little uncomfortable when she alleged that the assailant had disability rights to cause us harm.

I responded that being a danger to the public had nothing whatsoever to do with disability rights.

But she was of the opinion that the individual was experiencing PTSD as a veteran and that the dog was present due to the disability.

4. You did not believe that the animal was an emotional support animal, did you?

Answer: No, I've never seen a Doberman that is an emotional support animal. The breed is intended to perceive and guard against external threats, and that's a very different set of abilities from a dog that is emotionally responsive to its owner.

Further, if the dog had been an emotional support animal, he or she would have tried to calm down his raging owner -- and no such interaction occurred.

In fact, the assailant did not seem to be able to handle the dog particularly well. I was not convinced he actually owned the dog at all.

5. The other bystander, who introduced himself as "Bob," appeared to be a kind person.

Answer: Yes, he was appearing to travel with his wife, and he seemed shocked by the perpetrator's behavior. He expressed disapproval of the assailant in all the right ways. He seemed perfectly reasonable, and so did his spouse.

6. Yesterday, however, you found out who all these people were, didn't you?

Answer: Yes, I did.

7. How did that come about, please?

Answer: I decided to file a California Public Records Act request with the local police department in Tehachapi to see whether anyone had filed a complaint about the perpetrator.

And when I navigated online to the Tehachapi Police Department website, I immediately recognized "CJ" and the assailant himself as active duty police officers pictured with their colleagues.

8. So, the perpetrator and one of the witnesses are police officers?

Answer: Yes, they are. And I think it's highly likely that "Bob" is a retired police officer from the same department. These people all know each other, apparently.

Not only that, the entire incident was rehearsed and staged in detail, and afterwards, an AI-generated video was allegedly produced depicting different events with which the police officers' false witness statements corresponded.

9. What does the AI-generated video show?

Answer: I have no idea. Once, the FBI created AI-generated video of someone bearing my likeness in Flagstaff, Arizona in which I was allegedly screaming, crying and crawling through a laundromat. So, anything is possible.

10. You did proceed with filing your California Public Records Act/FOIA request, didn't you?

Answer: I most certainly did.

11. Did you also communicate with the Police Chief in Tehachapi?

Answer: Richard Standbridge. Yes, I sent him an email delineating the misconduct of his officers and requesting an explanation. Lying by law enforcement is a crime in the state of California, so these people have a lot of explaining to do. Their lack of integrity risked my life, certainly, so apologies are due in this matter and so are reparations.

Beyond this, I recently revealed an apparent plan by the Department of Justice to wrongfully demand audits of voter rolls in multiple states with an intent to corrupt the upcoming midterm elections.

So the attempt to discredit me at this moment in time places the integrity of the midterm elections at risk.

12. In light of the U.S. Attorney General's misconduct, did he have anything to do with the crimes of the lying police officers in Tehachapi? Did Todd Blanche's office direct the U.S. Attorney in the district to have direct communication with the police department in planning this attack ahead of time?

Answer: Did Todd Blanche's office have communication with U.S. District Attorney Eric Grant? Did his office also have communication with Kern County District Attorney Cynthia Zimmer? There are allegations that both of these communications occurred, yes, though I do not yet have independent verification of those calls.

13. Could you have lost your life through this attack?

Answer: Anytime you have a corrupt U.S. Attorney General directing communication with a District Attorney, yes, it's highly possible. The intent of that line of communication is to ensure that any loss of life is explained away by a District Attorney's false reporting about a violent event. In this way, a planned and public first degree murder by compromised law enforcement officials can be depicted in the official record as an "accident."

So, yes, it's a highly dangerous circumstance whenever that top-down communication is initiated.

14. Would the President have directed that communication?

Answer: Todd Blanche is serving at the pleasure of the President. I think the desire to exculpate the President in the context of any illegal planning that may have transpired to subvert the midterm elections is likely acute. We don't know what took place in terms of directives to the Attorney General other than the fact that the state of California was wrongfully directed to conduct an audit of its voter rolls within 48 hours through a demand from the Department of Justice, with threats of a federal investigation to follow. And the intent in that case appears to have been to disqualify a large number of lawful California voters.

15. On what basis would a large number of California voters have been disqualified?

Answer: On the basis of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates.

16. Would there have been arrests of innocent Americans?

Answer: This is entirely possible. Broad scale falsified law enforcement reporting is always intended to result in mass arrests at some point. We just need to review our history to understand that much.

17. What would have happened to those people if those arrests had occurred?

Answer: Fascism always involves mass detention, torture, and large-scale atrocities toward the peaceable public. In other words, people are taken from their homes, arrested, and never return.

It's a quick way to take complete control of a nation.

And the FBI has probably worked out exactly what percentage of people need to be targeted in order for the public at large to be terrorized into submission.

The numbers are not that high with purges of this nature. Likely one percent or less at the outset.

In this case, there would be allegations of extensive voter fraud.

Meanwhile, the FBI would be extorting the public for every ounce of wealth it could misappropriate from them.

18. Speaking of misappropriation, what has President Trump done with Foundation assets at this time? Where are the Foundation's assets and who has control of them? Have they been wrongfully disseminated? And to whom?

Answer: These are all highly appropriate questions. We need to understand whether the President is privatizing public wealth from the National Treasury through this case, and we need to understand where those assets are disappearing. Further, the records of this case that the President has directed to be destroyed need to be resurrected and accessed for a full accounting of the crimes he has committed in this matter.

19. What about Presidential immunity?

Answer: Presidential immunity is not Presidential impunity. Let's see what the American people have to say when the facts of this matter are revealed in their entirety.

20. Can all of the Foundation's assets be returned to Foundation auspices?

Answer: Clearly, this is what needs to occur on an immediate basis.

The Supreme Court does not approve of this theft of public assets, and neither does the Congress.

This level of crime dooms the chances for United States sovereignty, and no one who genuinely loves this country wants to see that loss.

21. Has the Supreme Court supported the Foundation's mission to ensure that United States sovereignty endures?

Answer: I believe the Supreme Court wants to see the United States retain its long term freedoms, so I believe they are supporting the Foundation's initiative, yes.

22. What needs to happen next with regard to your situation in Tehachapi, California?

Answer: Well, the President and Todd Blanche need to allow the Tehachapi Police Department to apologize to me for their misconduct. All of the false information needs to be acknowledged as invalid and then withdrawn entirely. Any and all wrongful charges against me need to be dropped immediately.

Any lasting harm to my animals needs to be reversed. Any tampering with my vehicle needs to be removed. Any plans for a staged car accident need to be withdrawn.

Certainly damages need to be paid, and these should be deposited into the Foundation, even though I am on leave from the Foundation at this time.

23. What type of lasting harm did your animals suffer?

Answer: It seems that the perpetrator of the public tantrum on Thursday may have dosed one of my dogs with a toxin that is alleged to cause "continuous cancer." She is currently quite ill, so the assertion seems plausible.

24. Were your dogs falsely characterized as vicious due to the compromised reports of the police officers involved?

Answer: Allegedly so. The intent seems to have been to justify their killing and my own.

25. Yet, your dogs are extremely friendly to others, aren't they?

Answer: Without question. They are the most loving dogs I have ever owned. Beautiful animals in every regard.

26. What are the most significant threats you are facing at this time?

Answer: Kidnapping, car bomb, staged car accident, car sabotage, staged accident with an e-bike or electric scooter, electro-magnetic targeting within my hotel room, staged evidence within my hotel room, staged evidence with items taken from my hotel room, staged evidence within my vehicle, physical assault including ambush when I take out recycling and trash at the hotel, compromised food and water, false witness statements of cognitive incapacity or mental illness, false witness statements of human trafficking activity, heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, lethal harm perpetrated during an ambulance transport. This list goes on.

27. What is your best defense?

Answer: The truth. Always the truth.

And I think it's important to state that not all truths have to be told at all times. But in this instance, corruption at the highest levels of the federal government has placed my life at risk through intentional attack.

So, in that case, I am going to be shining a bright light on these wrongful actions by those who are wielding the public trust and the power the public has vested in them in good faith.

28. What about the U.S. military in all of this? What is the military's role?

Answer: The U.S. military is answerable to the President as Commander in Chief. So we rely on the President not to be ordering an ambush of a highly honorable writer and human rights advocate in order to avoid public scrutiny for his own criminal acts.

If I were the U.S. military, I would want me on their side.

You don't target those who have the most to contribute to the nation.

29. The President allegedly fears impeachment regarding his criminal acts during these last two years. Do you have any thoughts about that matter?

Answer: I think that is a matter for the new Congress. And assuming our midterm elections will now be free and fair, I'm sure members of Congress will address any concerns they have about the President's treatment of his oath of office.

30. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Emails to the OIG Hotline

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:22:11 +0000

October 16, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your City of Tehachapi public records request #26-xxx has been submitted., sent at 5:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: FOIA/CPRA Request Relating to Misconduct on the Part of At Least Two Active-duty Tehachapi Police Officers, sent at 5:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Lane MacWilliams has shared notarized documents with you; Lane MacWilliams' Vow, sent at 12:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Corrected Request for Injunctive Relief, October 16, 2026, sent at 11:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief, October 16, 2026, sent at 11:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Alleged Food and Water Deprivation, Confidential, sent at 9:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your documents have been successfully... , sent at 8:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Apparent FBI Tampering with Hotel Room Curtains, sent at 6:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 6:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:52 Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 16, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 15 and 16, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Complaint, Further Details Pertaining to Dog Park Attack By Alleged Police Employees or Affiliates on October 15, 2026, sent at 5:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Alleged Police Department Staging of Attack at Park on October 15, 2026, sent at 5:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

The Real "Midterm Surprise"? A Free and Fair Election for the United States

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 15 Oct 2026 17:24:47 +0000

1. You found out what the "midterm surprise" was yesterday, didn't you?

Answer: I believe so.

2. How did that come about?

Answer: It seemed that my right to vote might be treated as a "test case" for a much larger perpetration of false claims of voter fraud nationally.

The State of California was directed by the U.S. Department of Justice to audit voting rolls concerning a list of names provided by the DOJ, and to do so within two days.

And it seemed that the federal government intended to disqualify those voters whose names were listed.

3. Was your name on that list?

Answer: I don't have that information, unfortunately.

But in an effort to learn more about my own access to a lawful voting process, I started asking questions of my county voting registrar's office, and the responses were, from my perspective, alarmingly insufficient, incomplete and dishonest.

Ultimately, it became quite clear through my dialogue with the county voting registrar that I was not likely to have access to participation in a free and fair election.

At that point, and with a great deal of regret, I felt it was necessary to withdraw my voter registration.

To be clear, this is not an action I recommend to anyone else. I think Americans should be registered to vote, and I think they should exercise their lawful right to vote at every opportunity.

4. Yet, you felt the withdrawal of your own voter registration might help other voters?

Answer: I did. Because I have filed a complaint with the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, the California Department of Justice and the California Secretary of State over this matter.

Given that there was a demand from the U.S. Attorney General to the state of California for an audit of voter rolls on short notice, along with a threat to follow up with federal investigators, it seemed that this could represent a much larger plan nationwide to disrupt the voting process.

If enough votes are disqualified through these proceedings, then the outcome of the midterms will be altered. And, no doubt, this is the intent.

5. You made the point yesterday that you believe the FBI, and subsequently the U.S. DOJ, accessed state voter rolls unlawfully. How did that occur?

Answer: It seems that, when many states refused to provide statewide voter rolls to the federal government when this was originally demanded a number of years ago, the FBI bypassed state Attorneys General and Secretaries of State and went directly to the County Voting Registrars, where the agency obtained the information through allegations of a "national security" prerogative. So the federal government has the information, though not through legal means. Further, the federal government appears to have identified the voters it wishes to disqualify. Likely, the Attorney General intends to give notification of required voter audits to numerous states, after which it will declare the response insufficient and commence an investigation intended to disqualify large numbers of honorable American voters.

6. So, can this scheme be halted in advance?

Answer: That's what we're about to find out.

7. What is the role of the DMV in the falsification of voters' names and addresses for the County Voting Registrars?

Answer: The DMV seems to be "updating" voters names and addresses with inserted errors and conveying those errors to the County Voting Registrars as though Americans are regularly re-registering to vote.

In some cases, the DMV appears to be misspelling addresses on driver's licenses with the explanation that these constitute DMV abbreviations, which is not the case.

8. And is all of this occurring at the direction of the FBI?

Answer: It seems to be, yes. These initiatives appear to be driven by the three-letter agencies. I do find it concerning that there is an allegation that Europeans are being affected by similar manipulations of their names and addresses, and that their own elections are being distorted by the same stratagems. This would imply CIA involvement, certainly. So, this is a problem that may well overflow our national borders. If this is even a remote possibility, I would think that the United Nations should be informed of this issue as soon as possible.

9. You have filed complaints about this matter, so are you prohibited from discussing this case publicly?

Answer: My public commentary may be the only means I have of thoroughly illuminating this issue for the wider nation and the wider world, so I think there is a necessity to talk about this to the extent that we can solve the issue together.

When Americans participate in free and fair elections, they are exercising their sovereignty, which our Constitution characterizes as inalienable. That is to say, our Constitution asserts that as human beings, we are born free and that our freedom is inseparable from our lives and our national character.

So we don't want to forfeit that sovereignty through silence, omission, inaction or fear.

We need to work together to support one another's sovereign rights as vigorously as we defend our own, That's what our freedom depends on -- our understanding that we cannot be free unless our neighbors are also free.

10. What is it about the United States that gives you hope for human sovereignty over the long term?

Answer: Americans have a great deal of courage and independence woven into our national identity. I think we possess a fundamental sense of fairness and equity that requires us to defend one another in difficult circumstances. I think we're generous, I think we're engaged, I think we're resilient, I think we're inquisitive, I think we're innovative, and I think we're insightful. All of this is extremely hopeful when it comes to the preservation of United States sovereignty.

On top of all of those gifts, I think we can fight our way out of a corner to miraculous degree.

So, we have reason to engage vigorously with these concerns regarding our fundamental freedoms.

11. Can we successfully do so?

Answer: I wouldn't be here if we couldn't succeed. I wouldn't be holding this torch if the path could not be illuminated. I wouldn't be sounding this clarion call if I did not think we could answer.

12. What do you imagine yourself doing on November 3, 2026?

Answer: I imagine myself bringing water, food, and encouragement to people who are waiting in line to cast their ballots. I don't know whether that's legal to do in all states, but that's what I would most like to do.

13. Will you please keep in close communication with us regarding this remarkable concern of false claims of voter fraud originating with the federal government?

Answer: Of course, yes.

14. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Preventing a Theft of America's Future

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:05:02 +0000

1. The FBI may have extended an extortion attempt today in an effort to "make a deal" regarding the necessity of returning funds to the Foundation for United States sovereignty. Now, it seems the FBI is doubling down on false allegations in an attempt to misappropriate funds for privatization.

Who would be the beneficiary of privatization of Foundation funds?

Answer: First, I need to express that misappropriations in the trillions of dollars place the United States at severe risk of sovereignty forfeiture in perpetuity.

So there really is no "safe" level of misappropriations in the trillions. Obviously, in ethical terms, we don't want misappropriations of any amount.

But private individuals who have sequestered trillions are effectively wielding a power that exceeds that of the major nations globally. These individuals have the resources to deploy their own private surveillance, to maintain their own private armies, to assign their own private assassins against whoever disagrees with them.

And there's no effective framework of accountability for these people. They are functioning as invisible rulers who cause the people to suffer great losses in their freedom and wellbeing. Yet, the public remains uncertain about the causes of their eroding self-determination.

2. Why is the FBI doubling down on false reporting at this time?

Answer: The far right may have taken control of Foundation funds. If so, this represents an intoxicating lure for the FBI.

This is an agency which appears to be focused on "money-making" day and night. Their personnel seem to consider themselves entrepreneurs, not organized criminals.

So, they're going to strive mightily to steal as much from the Foundation as they possibly can.

3. Does the President have the ability to call a halt to these abuses?

Answer: As Commander in Chief, he certainly has the authority, yes.

4. Does he have the motivation?

Answer: I would like to see that motivation demonstrated in his insistence on a hiatus in false reporting in the case for at least the length of time required to return the funds to the auspices of the Foundation.

No one should be attempting to capitalize on wrongful possession of the funds to add more lies from corrupt law enforcement into the mix.

We simply need the FBI to be forced to step back.

5. What is the risk with regard to disappearing funds?

Answer: The risk is that Vladimir Putin has his hands on the U.S. National Treasury, or that Xi Xinping does, or that A's cadre does. And the timing for any or all of these outcomes is astonishingly poor.

6. How do you feel about the FBI's alleged extortion attempts in general?

Answer: I can only say that the FBI knows by now that I am not a person who caves into extortion. I have promised the American people to support their sovereignty, and I cannot be corrupted in that journey.

7. So what message would you extend to President Trump regarding the current concerns?

Answer: I would respectfully request the return of Foundation funds on behalf American people. All our freedoms are in the balance. We cannot lose sight of the prize, which is our self-determination and all the meaning within life that accompanies our fundamental freedom.

8. What if the President himself is acting at the behest of a foreign power?

Answer: This is always a risk. If he's acting on his own behalf, the funds will come back in their entirety.

If he's acting on behalf of those opposed to the United States, we're going to have a battle royal in a legal context.

Our nation simply cannot tolerate that erosion of sovereignty coming from the highest leader in the land.

9. What can we do to encourage President Trump to do the right thing regarding this issue?

Answer: Those funds represent the future of the United States, the quality of life all Americans will enjoy, the character of freedom that all Americans will exercise in their daily lives, the self-determination with which they will be educated, choose their careers, care for their children and their elderly, live in a clean environment free from contamination or harm. This is really about the quality of the future we will all share.

A theft of these funds is a theft of that future.

So I think we can all agree, including President Trump, that those funds must be returned in their entirety.

10. Is there any intention on the part of the FBI to cause confusion and conflict surrounding the midterms, and then abscond with the funds in the midst of that smokescreen?

Answer: I think that is a genuine risk in this circumstance, without question. In a real sense, the FBI is holding the Foundation's assets hostage, and with that leverage, they will try to extract concessions from the American people, though without their consent. Instead the FBI will heavily pressure the Congress and the Supreme Court to agree to a "settlement" of funds that do not belong to the FBI at all.

11. Can the FBI be forced to concede instead?

Answer: I think we should all work for that outcome. If the Congress and the Supreme Court hold the line, we will succeed in recovering the funds for the Foundation. But the sooner the better, and I don't think anyone should be waiting for another urgent situation to arise.

12. Will you please keep us informed if the funds are returned promptly and if, as you have requested, the FBI is forced to take a hiatus from false reporting regarding this case?

Answer: Yes, of course.

13. Will the election be allowed to unfold freely and fairly?

Answer: I will be reporting any improper conduct on the part of the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office. Right now, it's clear to me that the voting registrars in general are under significant pressure from the FBI. How that manifests in this election, we have yet to fully comprehend.

14. Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 11, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 11 Oct 2026 21:21:38 +0000

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Adequately Preparing the American Electorate for the Midterm Elections

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:04:14 +0000

1. What are your thoughts about National Guardsmen and ICE being deployed to polling locations?

Answer: Anytime armed personnel are standing by during a voting process that should be free and fair, we need to acknowledge that there is substantive potential for a corrupted voting process.

2. What do you mean by that assertion?

Answer: We live in an era of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. In judicial settings, two or more witness statements from law enforcement officials are considered highly credible evidence.

Imagine 100 people arriving at a polling location. There's a little bit of a line as a result, and the line winds left and right in front of law enforcement personnel who are closely observing each voter. Quite a few voters have cell phones in their hands. A few may be having conversations on those phones, or with their spouses or neighbors while waiting in line. And, it goes without saying, this whole series of events is being filmed.

Everything appears to proceed normally in the voting process itself.

But a few hours later, without voters being informed, the law enforcement officers who were present at the time of the voting procedure file false witness statements alleging felonious content on voters' cell phones and felonious conduct within the voting hall. AI-generated film backs up everything they say. Some innocent voters may be arrested on the basis of the false allegations, and there may be a number of civilian witnesses who are also providing false witness statements to corroborate the other false evidence. What could the false accusations be? Jonathan Glaser was trying to vote twice. Or Mary Allenby signed a ballot for her sick mother who wasn't present. Basically, the false allegations would have to do with voter fraud.

Out of the 100 voters who showed up at the polling station at 12:00 noon, 37 were chosen ahead of time by an AI algorithm to be accused of a voting fraud conspiracy. Another 10 were directed to file false witness statements about what they saw. The remaining 53 are left alone for the time being.

And charges are filed against the 37 voters in a judicial proceeding that includes submission of all of the "evidence," after which their votes are disqualified on the basis that they are now convicted felons.

The thirty-seven disqualifications, multiplied across the national electorate, are enough to alter a number of voting outcomes. And that was the point all along.

3. Could this kind of scheme represent the basis for mass arrests?

Answer: Easily. But it's just as likely that the processes of voter disqualification would be concealed from the public, and the reported voting percentages would be extremely close to 50/50 voting outcomes. A given state senator would have won by just 312 votes, for example. Close race! So the disqualifications of votes would be entirely obscured.

With the help of AI-generated video, AI-generated cell phone communications, false testaments from law enforcement and false witness statements from other voters and voting personnel -- enough evidence would be present for mass convictions on the basis of a voter fraud conspiracy.

And you're off to the races at that point.

4. What do you mean by that?

Answer: The public trust has been violated. Anything can happen following the breach of the public's good faith.

5. What could protect against a scenario like the one you describe?

Answer: Filming with cell phones is generally prohibited inside and directly outside of polling locations, so this represents a substantive issue in terms of a truthful counterargument to false allegations.

I think Americans who are voting in person can go to the polls with friends and family members, who will stand as a bulwark against any false narrative. Voters can try to have a benevolent "voting buddy" who will confirm that everything they did inside the polling station was appropriate and lawful. And if someone finds herself or himself alone at the polling station, she or he can ask a benevolent stranger to vouch for their good conduct.

It is our bonds to one another that support our human rights.

We need to call on one another's kindness and responsiveness to ensure that our votes will be counted.

Further, during the time delay when the votes are being counted, Americans can email their County Voting Registrars to ask "Was my vote counted?" Their registrars will answer them! And this is a step everyone can be taking to safeguard our elections as well.

One of the things that political parties can be doing to ensure a free and fair vote is to let their supporters know the email of their local voting registrars and encourage them to follow up right away.

I don't think we can assume that everyone will take the time to look up the information.

But if the email is provided to them, many people will inquire.

In the longer term, there should be independent documentation of all events inside polling locations, and that material should never be made available for AI-generated alterations to content.

These are my recommendations.

They're low tech and achievable, so I hope people will make the extra effort to incorporate them.

6. In your estimation, what are the odds that such a scenario could be attempted during the midterm elections?

Answer: What are the odds that there will be false witness statements and falsified law enforcement reporting connected to the midterms at some level of perpetration? One hundred percent.

It won't happen at every polling location, but it will happen broadly enough to be a substantive concern regarding the integrity and validity of this election.

A scenario involving mass arrests would be much more of a declaration of conflict between the political parties and could involve false charges against members of Congress and state representatives.

But the risks are not low, and I think everyone can ascertain the clear and present concerns.

7. What are the chances that you yourself could be targeted through such a scheme of false reporting?

Answer: Significant. My cell phone appears to be a frequent target of Wifi piracy, so my communications are often faked, I presume. And, if Foundation assets have been returned or will soon be returned, then there may possibly be a high motivation to falsely implicate me for the purpose of profiteering by the Executive Branch.

8. Could such a scheme result in civil strife?

Answer: Peaceable protest is guaranteed by the Constitution. If Americans feel that their votes were not counted, then they will express their concern through peaceful gatherings, I'm sure. The key is to maintain them for enough successive days that the government has to grant concessions. One day of peaceful protests is not that effective. Ten to twenty consecutive days of peaceful protests is something that insists on a changed policy perspective. So, that's what people need to keep in mind.

Americans have a profound sense of fairness and social justice. And we're truly an impressive electorate in this regard, big-hearted and engaged and supportive and genuine.

9. Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Emails to the OIG Hotline -- Post in Progress

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 09 Oct 2026 15:17:19 +0000

October 13, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: A MESSAGE FOR..., sent at 2:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Voter Registration, sent at 9:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your documents have been successfully... sent at 8:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, sent at 7:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 13, 2026, Confidential, sent at 7:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 12 and 13, 2026, sent at 7:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 11, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 11, 2026, sent at 2:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Confidential, sent at 12:24 PM and 2:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Pre-conditions Re: Leave. sent at 9:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Newly Notarized Affidavit for Your Office, October 11, 2026, sent at 8:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Flagstaff, Arizona, Background Information ... sent at 8:23 AM and 8:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 5:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 5:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 11, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 10, 2026, sent at 5:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: New Item Discovered Within Hotel Suite, sent at 5:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Long Term Preservation of United States Sovereignty, sent at 4:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 10, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: E..., sent at 12:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 9, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, October 9, 2026, sent at 8:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 7:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 9, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 8, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 8, 2026, sent at 8:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 8, 2026, 5:26 PM, sent at 5:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Requests for Injunctive Relief, sent at 11:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

Requests for Injunctive Relief

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 08 Oct 2026 17:16:02 +0000

1. There are allegations that someone has filed false claims against the Foundation and/or against you yourself on the basis of a crime or crimes the FBI committed in the Flagstaff, Arizona area. Do you know anything about this issue?

Answer: I truly don't. There appear to be allegations that the Foundation has been robbed due to false claims. And if that is the case, I would ask that every penny be tracked so that the funds can be reclaimed at the earliest possible time. I certainly have committed no crimes in Flagstaff or anywhere else.

2. Is it true that the FBI has been referring to Democrats as "suckers" as recently as this morning due to the agency's theft of Foundation funds as a result of the agency's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer: I cannot comment on this allegation. It appears that the FBI may have forced certain Democrats to accept misappropriated funds in an effort to exculpate the agency of later accusations of wrongdoing. This is a classic stratagem of organized crime, which forces the acceptance of funds under threat in order to obfuscate the truth. If that's true, I think pressured officials can return funds at a later date and prosecutions can proceed against the actual aggressors.

3. Have Tom Lyons, Brandan Pesa and President Trump directed the misappropriation of funds based on false accusations toward you yourself?

Answer: Well, a DEW is currently being deployed within my hotel room at the TownePlace Suites in Tehachapi, so someone has certainly extended false accusations that have not been withdrawn as of this time.

4. Are any of these men capable of supporting the sovereignty of the United States?

Answer: Let's look at their prior actions for the answer to that question.

5. What is the likelihood that these men have arranged to take your life so that they can profiteer from Foundation funds without being held to account?

Answer: That would need to be determined in a legal setting, certainly.

However, I can say that some unknown person sent a message to my cell phone asking for forgiveness this morning.

6. Are you inclined to forgive Tom Lyons, Brandan Pesa and President Trump for the alleged crimes these men have committed against your family members and yourself?

Answer: Without naming names, I will simply say that a request for forgiveness implies that there is remorse. No one should be asking for forgiveness regarding funds that have not been returned to the Foundation or false accusations that have not yet been withdrawn. That's not a request for forgiveness. That's a request for a free license to commit first degree murder and misappropriation.

7. What are the threats of a "mishap" intended to take your life today, Thursday, October 8, 2026?

Answer: I have no idea. The FBI has repeatedly threatened to blow up hotels in which I have stayed previously, so they could be recycling that plan. Or they could plan to use an autonomous sniper device within my vehicle. Or they could have placed another car bomb on the vehicle itself, similar to the one I found on my rental car on August 28, 2026. Or they could be planning a staged car accident. Or they could be planning public violence. Any and all of these criminal plans could be in place.

But again, in this instance, this appears to be a clear attempt by criminal elements to hide the evidence of their theft of Foundation funds based on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

So, I don't think it's a viable approach. If I lose my life today, then at least three individuals will be on the front lines as murderers in the public record. And, while they may not care about that in the immediate term, history will care on their behalf, and so will everyone else.

8. What about recent claims that the President is afraid of impeachment with regard to his misconduct regarding this case?

Answer: I think anyone who continues to misappropriate funds from the Foundation and anyone who continues to strive against the sovereignty of the United States is placing himself in legal jeopardy at this point.

9. You are not amenable to any negotiation with the current President or with the FBI?

Answer: You cannot negotiate with someone who wants your life. It's important to know where people are coming from in terms of their fundamental motivations. Benevolent people always want to believe that others are approaching them with a mirrored benevolence. But this is not always the case, and there are certain historical times in which we make that assumption at our peril.

In answering your question, I will simply say that I will not be conversing with anyone who intends to take my life. Absolutely not.

10. And you will not be extending a demanded "forgiveness" to those who feel guilty about their crimes associated with knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer: Again, this is a legal matter. I do advise those who have lied in a courtroom, and the FBI is front and center on this score, to withdraw their false claims and acknowledge what they have done to harm not only this case, but the larger sphere of an independent judiciary within the United States.

11. Do you grant the OIG Hotline the permission to appeal any wrongful conviction or convictions to the Supreme Court?

Answer: Yes, I hereby extend to the OIG Hotline a request for injunctive relief regarding any lower court conviction or convictions pertaining to this case.

12. Can that request be urgently pursued?

Answer: I would hope so.

13. You picked up your absentee ballot yesterday. Will you be allowed to have your vote counted in this election if the FBI and its close affiliates have extended knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against you?

Answer: If there are concealed convictions, then my vote will be discounted, certainly. And this is true for all Americans. Anyone who has suffered false accusations within a hidden dossier held by the FBI can have their vote disqualified without their ever knowing that it has happened. Law enforcement officials present in voting locations can sign false statements saying that certain voters were suspicious or had suspicious content on their cell phones or suspicious communications within their direct observation -- and that alone will likely be enough to invalidate votes.

And this has been my point for the last nine years.

We cannot expect that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting will result in anything other than corrupted elections.

We should not be surprised by this problem, and we should not expect that the FBI will exercise restraint with regard to false reporting pertaining to the midterms.

14. So, how will you move forward in casting your vote?

Answer: I am going to fill out my ballot, but I am hereby requesting an order for injunctive relief from the Supreme Court to allow my vote to be counted in light of my long term advocacy for the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, opposing unconstitutional conduct by the FBI.

15. Can the Supreme Court grant that freedom for your lawful and honorable vote to be counted?

Answer: I have faith in the Supreme Court. I think they can.

16. Will you please continue to remain in close contact with us given the extraordinary threats to your life and wellbeing you are currently experiencing?

Answer: Of course. Yes.

17. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Complaint, October 7, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 07 Oct 2026 19:51:04 +0000

OIG Hotline, please receive this complaint regarding any and all false claims pertaining to my activities, words, associations or actions vis a vis the Foundation or in any other context.

I continue to uphold the highest possible standards of conduct at all times in recognition of the opportunity to contribute to the sovereignty of the United States and the self-determination of our people.

I have made no recent political contributions to my knowledge and understanding, and any such contributions would have been extended without my awareness or consent. I cannot reference any fraudulent contributions, because Chase Bank appears to be withholding my requested credit card records at this time.

That said, I will be requesting the provision of these records once more.

In the meantime, please take any legal action necessary to protect the Foundation and related accounts from misappropriation, in addition to protecting my safety and security at this time.

Thank you for your intervention at the earliest possible time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Upholding Standards for Foundation Leadership

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:54:19 +0000

1. What is the latest attempt to misappropriate funds from the Foundation you have specified for the support of American sovereignty?

Answer: It seems as though there are false claims of communication regarding campaign finance between Democrats and myself, when those have not taken place.

2. Haven't you recently received outreach from the Trump administration?

Answer: Not that has represented dialogue, no. Having said that, I do receive emails and text messages from both Democrats and Republicans. I'm not actually able to take meetings with political figures, because the chances for misrepresentation are significant.

3. May I ask you to elaborate?

Answer: It would be relatively easy for a third party such as the FBI to state that we were discussing finances or campaigns or political maps or legislation or Constitutional Amendments or endorsements. And I am not able to engage in any of these ways.

As an example, I had outreach recently from an organization called The Grand Bargain Project. But I am not able to discuss fundraising issues with them because they are notably left-leaning. So, as much as I enjoy discussing history, government, and the sovereignty of the American people, I cannot engage at the level of discussing specific platforms, campaigns, fundraising, or any other partisan approach to the interests of the United States.

4. Didn't you make allocations recently to level out political spending regarding the midterm elections?

Answer: Only if the Supreme Court approved of that measure as a means of fully educating the American public about their political choices in November.

There are cases in which Democrats have outspent Republicans, and, conversely, in which Republicans have outspent Democrats. So, I was simply suggesting that the public have the opportunity to learn more about the candidates' policies and priorities in advance of the election. My support was entirely non-partisan.

5. Are you an independent voter?

Answer: Yes, I am. I don't think I have cancelled previous registrations, but my most recent registration is as an independent voter. And again, this is most helpful, because it allows me to support Americans' sovereignty without political bias or undue influence.

6. Have you asked for financial documentation recently from Chase Bank?

Answer: I have, yes. I asked for credit card documentation, because there has been an indication that there may have been fraudulent charges on my account without my knowledge or consent.

7. And did they supply that documentation at your request?

Answer: No, they appear to be intentionally withholding it, which certainly raises concerns.

8. Do you think there are fraudulent political donations on that credit card?

Answer: Yes, I think there may be, and I only say this on the basis of thank you messages I have received regarding donations I did not make.

9. Who would have been behind any such fraudulent donations?

Answer: Oh, the FBI and its affiliates, without question.

They have waited for a time when I'm traveling, and then they have exercised their prerogative to withhold records from me. So, the conduct is limited to only a few powerful agencies, with the FBI at the top of the list.

10. You need a bit more time to obtain the records in question, apparently.

Answer: Yes, in the face of FBI obstruction, everything takes more time.

11. But in the meantime, the FBI may be accusing you of collusion in which you have not participated to any degree whatsoever.

Answer: You know, this is the great challenge at hand. The FBI is both the arsonist and the firefighter. FBI personnel are both committing the crimes and then subsequently "discovering" them. Whether we are talking about Flagstaff, Arizona or a credit card account, the agency is acting in criminal and predatory ways toward the American public. And then, remarkably, every crime committed by the FBI is subsequently projected onto innocent Americans. So, the agency represents one big tautological trap of falsified law enforcement reporting. Everyone has a fake dossier of "crimes" of which they know nothing, often backed up by AI representation of their image and voice.

So, the FBI has become an exceptionally dangerous threat to American sovereignty.

And we really have no plan to unwind these corrupted programs as of yet, with our opportunity to intervene in these compromised initiatives rapidly receding.

12. You have shopped for a car recently. Did you buy one?

Answer: No. The FBI was using my visit to a car dealership to further knowingly false claims, so I did not pursue this possibility, even though I do need a safe vehicle to drive.

The sovereignty of the United States is more important than my car at this moment.

But obviously, I can best support that sovereignty if my safety and security are maintained.

13. Do you feel that the Foundation will be preserved in light of these disclosures?

Answer: I think it must be preserved, yes.

14. Have you maintained all requirements for foundation leadership in general?

Answer: I have endeavored to scrupulously maintain all requirements, yes. I am exceptionally careful about my conduct, my communications, my activities, every initiative I undertake.

I know that everything I do can have tremendous repercussions regarding Americans' future freedoms, so I take that responsibility seriously and I manifest it as my first priority.

15. Do you hope to have the opportunity to intervene on behalf of American sovereignty over time?

Answer: I do.

16. Will you please remain in close communication with us, given the fact that there seem to be mounting pressures regarding your case and the implications of your case?

Answer: Yes, of course.

17. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Emails to the OIG Hotline

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:48:02 +0000

October 8, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, October 8, 2026, sent at 8:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 8:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Scientific...., sent at 5:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 8, 2026, Confidential, sent at 4:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 7, 2026, sent at 3:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 7, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Allegations of Non-conventional..., sent at 7:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Voice to Text Dictation..., sent at 7:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Complaint, October 7, 2026, sent at 12:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Upholding Standards for Foundation Leadership, sent at 9:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, October 7, 2026, sent at 8:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 6:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 6:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 7, 2026, sent at 6:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Dog Park, sent at 6:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd 30/55, sent at 6:35 AM and 6:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 6, 2026, sent at 6:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

Important Additional Change to Funding Allocations

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:46:35 +0000

OIG Hotline, in order to prevent pressure on your Office by the FBI, affiliated agencies, and/or organized crime, I am hereby withdrawing at this time the clause in my finances affidavit which allows the current lead investigator in my case to increase funding by up to 50% of the original allocation for any and/or all initiatives budgeted at 1T or below.

I will make this change in future affidavits. However, for the time being, this document is to serve as legal and binding and is to replace the previous clause addressing this issue.

Thank you for allowing me to make this change to my documentation.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Change to Funding Allocations

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 20:54:03 +0000

OIG Hotline, at this time, I will be excluding space related initiatives from those for which the OIG Hotline has the authority to increase funding by up to 50 percent. Further, I am limiting funding for space related initiatives to 500 B at this time. This change will be reflected in my next affidavit for your Office. In the meantime, this is to be considered a legal and binding document.

This is due to the fact that two individuals have manipulated certain initiatives in improper ways. If potential increases in funding for other initiatives are resulting in extortion by organized crime, I will need to make further changes as well.

Beyond this, certain individuals appear to have colluded in a plan to remove certain members of the OIG Hotline from their positions of authority in overseeing this matter.

If I need to make further changes to ensure that honorable conduct is upheld and preserved in this case, I will do so.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

The Loss of a Child Is Not "Math." The Loss of Our Greatest Gifts Is Not "Collateral Damage."

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 19:22:31 +0000

OIG Hotline, please accept this complaint against the FBI and its affiliates with regard to alleged false accusations pertaining to the loss of a child's life (It is unknown to me whether this referenced child was a boy or a girl.) in or around the area of Flagstaff, Arizona. I have asked your Office for verification of the fundamental facts of this situation, and I am not yet in receipt of that information. Having said that, if the FBI has indeed harmed a child in the Flagstaff, Arizona area with the intent of not only obtaining a wrongful conviction against me or another person with regard this alleged crime, and potentially with regard to previous crimes by the FBI in this case, then an immediate lawsuit against the agency and all those involved is not only appropriate, it is necessary.

Secondly, I hereby request an order of injunctive relief regarding two issues:

The FBI and its affiliates should in no way receive financial rewards for committing violence against the American public regardless of specific programs, Executive Orders, or overall mission and objectives. The lives of the public cannot become a violent video game with points, bonuses, and rewards for the murder of innocent Americans wrongfully maligned by FBI programs of false reporting. (To place this in perspective, the agency will have false reporting about any and every child it has harmed, in order to wrongfully justify its appalling predation. This information should be acquired by the OIG Hotline so that the record of this case includes the details of the FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against all Americans, including minor children.). Any and all misappropriated funds relating to false accusations in this case must be returned to the Foundation I have specified for the preservation of American sovereignty.

Any and all orders for my harm based on wrongful conviction pertaining to false evidence by the FBI, including falsified DNA evidence, should be prohibited from manifesting through an emergency intervention from the Supreme Court. I can only assist the nation's sovereignty if I am alive and well, and beyond that, free from unjustified harm and predatory conduct by the FBI and its affiliated agencies and contractors.

Thank you very much for your advocacy regarding these critical concerns.

I will close by saying the following:

This morning I received an email with the subject heading "Let's talk about the math, Lane," as if this were an opportunity for extortion by the FBI.

This is my response.

The loss of a child's life is not "math."

Those who think otherwise need to go back to school to re-evaluate the way they are looking at this situation in terms of critical moral boundaries.

If we want to do the "math," we can start by talking about AI-mediated quotas of various kinds, the totals of which I happen to know -- and not through any disclosures from any "insider" or transfer by anyone of sensitive information.

But if we want to be worthy human beings, we will look at things differently -- meaningfully, insightfully, benevolently, compassionately, and with wisdom and insight.

True leadership is about extending the wisdom we need in the time window we need it. We need not only to be right in our interventions, but we need to be right at the right time.

This is the reason I have stated that we need to work together to ensure that these interventions occur. I can best facilitate that process if I am spoken of honestly and truthfully, and if my participation is upheld in all circumstances.

A worthy nation will not emerge from our current crises by accident.

Rather, it will be created by those of us who understand that what makes humanity dignified, worthy, redemptive, brilliant, mysterious, knowing, and transformative cannot be abandoned at this crossroads.

Just as the loss of a child is not "math," the loss of our greatest gifts is not "collateral damage."

The United States will only be able to assume leadership on the global stage with regard to human potential and environmental sustainability if we comprehend these truths.

Thank you for allowing me to express these most serious concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

On the Causes of Moral Outrage

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 04:27:42 +0000

1. Evidently some of President Trump's inner circle are now stating privately that he should be in prison. Do you know what they are referring to?

Answer: There is an allegation that he approved of the FBI's murder of a first-grade child (I don't know the gender) in Flagstaff, Arizona in order to try to misappropriate funds from the Foundation. Nor, I should point out, do I know whether the allegations are legitimate.

Having said that, FBI personnel and affiliates appeared to be breaking into my apartment and placing items there that did not belong to me. When I rented a pickup truck to move some furniture, a nearly identical pickup truck appeared in the same parking spot with a child's items in the flatbed of the vehicle. So, there were details such as this that were entirely alarming.

2. Why is Tom Lyons so focused on trying to falsely accuse you of child murder?

Answer: Because this is precisely the crime he and his friends have committed. All of their worst acts are projected outward onto the innocent. And, obviously, they feel tremendous guilt over this fact. The conscience is a remarkable taskmaster, and these people are hounded by their own.

I simply need to say that I do not appreciate the projected blame, and I will not tolerate its continuation.

3. Doesn't Tom Lyons want you to approve of his candidacy for a certain position of an unspecified nature?

Answer: That suggestion has been rumored.

4. Is he going about it the right way by falsely accusing you of the FBI's most heinous acts?

Answer: Brilliant question. This doesn't quite seem logical, does it?

5. What does Tom Lyons need to do to atone for his conduct, now and in the past?

Answer: First, he should stop killing children in any setting at any time for any reason.

Second, he should acknowledge his knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting concerning genetics and whatever other false evidence he has concocted.

I have traveled all over the country during the last six months. Is Tom Lyons going to be killing a child for every location in which I spent a few days in a row? Do we need to wonder about this now?

6. How preposterous is it that Tom Lyons is extending these false accusations through concealed proceedings in a court of law in which you are not even informed of the allegations nor allowed to speak in your own defense?

Answer: The Supreme Court would not be conducting itself in this manner with regard to this case, in my opinion. So, what's really astonishing, beyond all the details you describe, is the fact that Tom Lyons is shopping for judges in lesser courts -- those who do not know his history of lying throughout this case, and those who can be easily manipulated to render a guilty verdict based on utter falsehoods and prevarication.

With regard to the concealment, this is just an unthinkable distortion of jurisprudence.

Tom Lyons won't invite me into the courtroom, because he knows he would end up in handcuffs once I had had my say.

7. What responsibility does the President bear in this situation?

Answer: The President is Commander in Chief. He knows any narrative along these lines is false. Every person involved in this deceit must be seen as bearing one hundred percent of the responsibility. Obviously, the President is uniquely positioned to bear that burden, since he is the one who authorizes false reporting initiatives.

8. What was your response to these allegations when you learned of them this evening?

Answer: Absolute incredulity. I cannot think of any situation in which someone who has extended so much on behalf of the nation has been treated so poorly by a sitting President.

9. What is the justification?

Answer: It appears to be pure avarice. The Foundation bears substantive capital which it is committed to apply to the support of American sovereignty. And obviously, there are those who would wish to privatize those funds for their own personal sequestration of power.

10. How do we know the President wouldn't use it well?

Answer: Because he is selling off the National Parks, shutting down the Endangered Species Act, and exploiting America's pristine landscapes for mining and drilling interests. He is not preserving the nation's territorial integrity as it is.

Nor do our people feel valued and upheld.

11. How do you answer the President's assertion that we have entered "the Golden Age?"

Answer: Whose "Golden Age"? I have been traveling around the country for the past six months and I can state with confidence that the American people are growing poorer.

Those who don't have their mitts on the National Treasury are struggling.

12. How do you respond to FBI threats to "turn the lights out" over a substantial part of the country if they don't like the way the midterm elections are shaping up?

Answer: I think they're quite serious. The FBI doesn't believe in democracy. Elections make them queasy. They would prefer to dispense with the entire process. They feel that planned terrorist acts serve their cause.

13. What can these people do to apologize appropriately at this juncture?

Answer: As I said, they can stop killing innocent children and then, adding insult to atrocity, blaming it on the blameless.

After that, they can acknowledge in a courtroom the specifics of their false accusations.

14. Wouldn't you appreciate a direct apology relating to Tom Lyons' misconduct in this matter?

Answer: Unequivocally. Yes. But I would immediately observe that, given Mr. Lyons' efforts to take my life, that apology would be best extended through an independent intermediary.

15. Is the FBI still considering a Peng Shuai-style "replacement" through AI-generated audio and video following violent conduct on the part of the agency?

Answer: I am informed that they are, yes.

16. And hasn't Tom Lyons really originated that whole line of attack?

Answer: This appears to be the consensus, yes.

17. What would it take for the FBI to abandon that course of planning?

Answer: Sufficient exposure would place a damper on such plans, certainly. One of the greatest concerns I have is that the FBI has obviously perpetrated this type of crime before. How many times has the FBI "replaced" American citizens with AI communications, video and audio? This is anyone's guess. But the answer is more than 100. They feel fairly confident.

18. Do you carry a sense of moral outrage over the crimes that have allegedly been committed by the FBI in the hope of the agency's profiteering from this case?

Answer: How could it be possible for good people to respond with any less? Moral outrage represents an appropriate description.

At the same time, we need to ensure that we place blame where it belongs. And that means that the FBI and the President have a lot of explaining to do to the American public regarding the allegation that these men may have harmed a young child in their pursuit of profit.

We need to be exceptionally clear that the American public is not enslaved to overseers who determine their lives and deaths with impunity and callous disregard for our humanity, benevolence, worthiness, sovereignty, and gifts.

Tom Lyons is now responsible for publicly disclosing all he knows about the false reporting in this allegation.

19. And speculation from insiders that President Trump himself belongs in prison?

Answer: Let's find out the truth of what he authorized in this situation before speculating about where he belongs.

But in general, any individual who is harming innocents for profit needs to be exposed for a predatory criminality that the public will evaluate by its moral and ethical measures that hold to the truth.

20. What about FBI programs that involve murder of the American public?

Answer: All of the atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War II's Holocaust were legal at the time or rendered legal shortly after they occurred. But the Holocaust still stands as a moral wound on humanity's shared responsibility for the deaths of innocents.

We have learned that human beings are capable of perpetrating astonishing and unforgivable wrongs when they justify those acts as necessary for the aggregation of power.

And it is precisely because of the existence of unacceptable programs by the FBI that I have made the point that we need to re-approach our current environmental crisis from a much better vantage point.

That doesn't mean the President should be authorizing the murder of children in this case, and he should not assume my silence if he does.

He will not receive that response.

21. What about allegations that President Trump will order you to be killed on the basis of his desire to avoid accountability for this latest alleged murder on the part of Tom Lyons?

Answer: There were prior allegations that Executive Orders had been extended for murders, including my own, that would allow the misappropriation of the Foundation for the profiteering of the President. So, I think this conduct needs to be regarded as part of the same case and part of the same miscarriage of justice.

22. Has the Foundation been preserved as of this moment?

Answer: I certainly hope it has. The American people deserve to know that those funds are still present in full in defense of their sovereignty.

23. And you will not be tolerating invasions of that funding for "privatization" by corrupt public officials?

Answer: I will not.

Nor will I be tolerating further predatory FBI crimes toward this innocent under the heading of this case.

Let's expose the facts of this matter and see what the public has to say about those who would so disregard our most profound bonds to one another in intentionally targeting our most vulnerable members of society.

24. What is your response to the FBI's statements about being "concerned for all involved in this tragedy"?

Answer: The FBI does not get to speak those words when the FBI caused the tragedy.

25. What is your response to those who say that things will become better regarding your case as soon as the midterm elections arrive?

Answer: With conduct such as the FBI is alleged to be perpetrating now, one month is an eternity away.

The benevolent public cannot withstand this type of malfeasance from the President and expect to remain unharmed.

26. You will not accept FBI exhortations to remain silent over these false allegations?

Answer: No one should expect silence in response to heinous crimes perpetrated by the FBI in this matter.

That suggestion is disconnected from reality, and I would question the mental health of anyone who would extend it.

I am always going to defend the innocent and the vulnerable.

If the President wants to abandon those values, he's going to need to meet the public over this issue and explain himself.

27. What can be done about Tom Lyons and his FBI cohort, a group that appears to be facilitating atrocities on a repeated basis?

Answer: These people have legal immunity, apparently. But they do not have immunity from the public's clear-eyed evaluation of their criminal acts. This conduct is completely unacceptable to any civilized society, and I ask that the facts be disclosed on an immediate basis in order to ensure that no further harm or defamation occurs.

28. What about the assertion of certain members of Russian organized crime that they are the "boss" of the nation at this point?

Answer: Let's find out how the American public feels about their alleged harm of innocent Americans. Once the facts of this matter are fully revealed to the American people, these individuals may not feel so self-assured.

How would Tom Lyons or Brandan Pesa's children respond to the knowledge that their fathers allegedly murdered children for profit?

What do they think their children's friends would say about them at school?

These men are condemning their own families to an existence of shame and regret. So I don't think this situation is so easily dismissed on the basis of legal immunity from prosecution.

Further, I will say this: if it is true that the FBI has killed a child and attempted to extend wrongful blame toward me for this atrocity, then the agency needs to extend rather limitless damages to me over the associated crimes, including defamation, with those damages to be deposited into the Foundation I have specified for the support of American sovereignty.

Beyond this, the agency can have no possibility of profiteering from misappropriations of Foundation assets in the future. Otherwise, there would be an incentive for the FBI to continue down this unconscionable path.

And we simply cannot allow that to occur.

29. It is reported that the FBI has perpetrated lethal harm of some kind toward a FlexCar vehicle that you are meant to pick up today, October 4, 2026. How are you going to address that allegation?

Answer: One monstrosity at a time. It's 5:20 AM in the morning. I need some rest right now.

30. Thank you for speaking with us this morning

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Time for the FBI to Abandon Institutional Deceit in This Case

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:02:30 +0000

1. There are reports of recent attempts to invade the funds currently within the Foundation you have established for the support of American sovereignty. What is the basis for that attempted misappropriation?

Answer: They are likely to represent a combination of lies, among them false accusations of Communism, shoplifting, human trafficking, drug trafficking, fraudulent misrepresentation, and predatory conduct toward the vulnerable.

2. How many of those accusations are true?

Answer: Zero.

3. You are currently reading a book called "Less Is More." Is the author a Communist?

Answer: He's not a capitalist, that's for certain. And I disagree with him on his points about the economy, while I am interested in his ideas about the environment.

4. Can you please expound on your thoughts regarding the capitalist economy of the United States?

Answer: Right now, it's important for us to understand that we're not experiencing a free market system, per se. AI is now integrated into American banking and shadow banking to the extent that the behavior of the bond markets, commodities and other investments is not a true reflection of Adam Smith's "invisible hand." Consumer prices also do not currently reflect a free market.

Having said that, the United States has historically appreciated the free flow of capital to support innovation, entrepreneurship, and ever-emerging technologies in the realms of high tech, biotech, medicine, scientific research, and more.

The ability to create new businesses, to contribute to new aspects of American culture through the arts and communications, to establish new frontiers for human development through science and technology -- these are part of the American ethos which claims not only that Americans have a gift for creating new intellectual property and proprietary technology, but also that, through that same process, for reinventing themselves.

We view our proprietary inventions as so central to our experience of life that they are part of our identity.

That's part of what makes Americans unique and industrious and driven and insightful and rare. We don't want to give up our invaluable ways of interacting with the wider world.

5. So you believe in the free market.

Answer: Yes. If we want innovation and creation and human development, we need to support the free market.

The key is going to be to task the free market with solving our environmental challenges. The solutions in that realm may require advanced economies to consume less over time, so we need to consider the free market economics of sustainability as a high priority.

6. You don't sound like a Communist.

Answer: I am not a Communist. I believe that Americans have a proprietary interest in and right to their own inventions, and that no one else, including the FBI, has the right to misappropriate their intellectual property and sell it to the highest bidder on the international market.

7. Are you guilty of any of the other accusations the FBI has fabricated regarding this case?

Answer: No, I am not. I am a highly honorable person, and I think this should be obvious by this time, given my attempts to support United States sovereignty.

8. So, can the current false accusations be seen purely as an attempt to misappropriate Foundation funds and funds that are owing to the Foundation?

Answer: Yes, I think it is clear that the FBI's lies in this case have been inexcusable. They have been motivated entirely by money.

9. Are you of a mind to overlook missing funds or redacted records?

Answer: Missing funds and redacted records are highly likely to result in the strengthening of the enemies of American sovereignty.to the point that individual sovereignty cannot be reasserted. There's simply a point at which privatization of wealth becomes so egregious as to foreclose all possibilities of the public's future freedom. So misappropriations at this time cannot be tolerated.

10. Will the Congress and the Supreme Court offer their support in this regard?

Answer: I am confident that they will.

11. And you yourself will insist that funding and documentation be complete.

Answer: Yes, I am insisting.

12. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

2. How many of those accusations are true?

Answer: Zero.

3. You are currently reading a book called "Less Is More." Is the author a Communist?

Answer: He's not a capitalist, that's for certain. And I disagree with him on his points about the economy, while I am interested in his ideas about the environment.

4. Can you please expound on your thoughts regarding the capitalist economy of the United States?

We view our proprietary inventions as so central to our experience of life that they are part of our identity.

That's part of what makes Americans unique and industrious and driven and insightful and rare. We don't want to give up our invaluable ways of interacting with the wider world.

5. So you believe in the free market.

Answer: Yes. If we want innovation and creation and human development, we need to support the free market.

6. You don't sound like a Communist.

7. Are you guilty of any of the other accusations the FBI has fabricated regarding this case?

Answer: No, I am not. I am a highly honorable person, and I think this should be obvious by this time, given my attempts to support United States sovereignty.

8. So, can the current false accusations be seen purely as an attempt to misappropriate Foundation funds and funds that are owing to the Foundation?

Answer: Yes, I think it is clear that the FBI's lies in this case have been inexcusable. They have been motivated entirely by money.

9. Are you of a mind to overlook missing funds or redacted records?

10. Will the Congress and the Supreme Court offer their support in this regard?

Answer: I am confident that they will.

11. And you yourself will insist that funding and documentation be complete.

Answer: Yes, I am insisting.

12. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen