Lane von Herzen

Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 11, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 11 Oct 2026 21:21:38 +0000

To the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, this letter is to formally claim all awards that have been extended in adjudication of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI, by other governmental agencies in the United States and elsewhere, and by their affiliates over the entire course of my human rights advocacy and related case.

This is to include all awards extended in my name and/or associated with my identity and/or social security number as of this writing. This is to include my maiden name, Carol Elaine Von Herzen, and misspellings of my maiden name, my author name, Lane von Herzen, and misspellings of my author name, and my married name, Lane MacWilliams, and misspellings of my married name.

This is also to include any and all funds extended through adjudication of other cases of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI, by other governmental agencies, in the United States and elsewhere, and by their affiliates, if the Supreme Court rules or has ruled that those funds may be legally and ethically claimed and deposited into the Foundation I have designated for the preservation of the sovereignty of the United States.

Due to apparent repeated attempts to misappropriate these funds, please place them in the Foundation at your earliest opportunity, thus protecting them from invasion by those who may seek to personally profiteer from this case.

If any government agencies or current or former government officials have facilitated the hacking or invasion of my accounts in order to misappropriate funds awarded to me, I ask that those funds be assertively re-appropriated and replaced.

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Please ensure that my direct participation is required for designations of funds from the Foundation in every circumstance, unless I myself broaden that responsibility at a later time through notarized documentation which I would place on my blog and elsewhere for public review. And please disallow impersonation of my identity through genetic manipulation, Wifi piracy, namesake or familial claims that are unknown to me and unconsented by me, and/or other unapproved assumptions of my identity.

At the appropriate time, please engage in direct outreach to me to ensure that I can be of the greatest support to the nation at this most critical point in the struggle for the human sovereignty of the American people, the territorial integrity of our national provenance over the United States and associated waters, and the future independence of our nation in its entirety.

Please accept all legal responsibility for the correct and complete filing of documents, paperwork, reporting, exact and comprehensive accounting, and follow up associated with the Foundation and the designations I have made and will make regarding the support for American sovereignty.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Adequately Preparing the American Electorate for the Midterm Elections

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:04:14 +0000

1. What are your thoughts about National Guardsmen and ICE being deployed to polling locations?

Answer: Anytime armed personnel are standing by during a voting process that should be free and fair, we need to acknowledge that there is substantive potential for a corrupted voting process.

2. What do you mean by that assertion?

Answer: We live in an era of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. In judicial settings, two or more witness statements from law enforcement officials are considered highly credible evidence.

Imagine 100 people arriving at a polling location. There's a little bit of a line as a result, and the line winds left and right in front of law enforcement personnel who are closely observing each voter. Quite a few voters have cell phones in their hands. A few may be having conversations on those phones, or with their spouses or neighbors while waiting in line. And, it goes without saying, this whole series of events is being filmed.

Everything appears to proceed normally in the voting process itself.

But a few hours later, without voters being informed, the law enforcement officers who were present at the time of the voting procedure file false witness statements alleging felonious content on voters' cell phones and felonious conduct within the voting hall. AI-generated film backs up everything they say. Some innocent voters may be arrested on the basis of the false allegations, and there may be a number of civilian witnesses who are also providing false witness statements to corroborate the other false evidence. What could the false accusations be? Jonathan Glaser was trying to vote twice. Or Mary Allenby signed a ballot for her sick mother who wasn't present. Basically, the false allegations would have to do with voter fraud.

Out of the 100 voters who showed up at the polling station at 12:00 noon, 37 were chosen ahead of time by an AI algorithm to be accused of a voting fraud conspiracy. Another 10 were directed to file false witness statements about what they saw. The remaining 53 are left alone for the time being.

And charges are filed against the 37 voters in a judicial proceeding that includes submission of all of the "evidence," after which their votes are disqualified on the basis that they are now convicted felons.

The thirty-seven disqualifications, multiplied across the national electorate, are enough to alter a number of voting outcomes. And that was the point all along.

3. Could this kind of scheme represent the basis for mass arrests?

Answer: Easily. But it's just as likely that the processes of voter disqualification would be concealed from the public, and the reported voting percentages would be extremely close to 50/50 voting outcomes. A given state senator would have won by just 312 votes, for example. Close race! So the disqualifications of votes would be entirely obscured.

With the help of AI-generated video, AI-generated cell phone communications, false testaments from law enforcement and false witness statements from other voters and voting personnel -- enough evidence would be present for mass convictions on the basis of a voter fraud conspiracy.

And you're off to the races at that point.

4. What do you mean by that?

Answer: The public trust has been violated. Anything can happen following the breach of the public's good faith.

5. What could protect against a scenario like the one you describe?

Answer: Filming with cell phones is generally prohibited inside and directly outside of polling locations, so this represents a substantive issue in terms of a truthful counterargument to false allegations.

I think Americans who are voting in person can go to the polls with friends and family members, who will stand as a bulwark against any false narrative. Voters can try to have a benevolent "voting buddy" who will confirm that everything they did inside the polling station was appropriate and lawful. And if someone finds herself or himself alone at the polling station, she or he can ask a benevolent stranger to vouch for their good conduct.

It is our bonds to one another that support our human rights.

We need to call on one another's kindness and responsiveness to ensure that our votes will be counted.

Further, during the time delay when the votes are being counted, Americans can email their County Voting Registrars to ask "Was my vote counted?" Their registrars will answer them! And this is a step everyone can be taking to safeguard our elections as well.

One of the things that political parties can be doing to ensure a free and fair vote is to let their supporters know the email of their local voting registrars and encourage them to follow up right away.

I don't think we can assume that everyone will take the time to look up the information.

But if the email is provided to them, many people will inquire.

In the longer term, there should be independent documentation of all events inside polling locations, and that material should never be made available for AI-generated alterations to content.

These are my recommendations.

They're low tech and achievable, so I hope people will make the extra effort to incorporate them.

6. In your estimation, what are the odds that such a scenario could be attempted during the midterm elections?

Answer: What are the odds that there will be false witness statements and falsified law enforcement reporting connected to the midterms at some level of perpetration? One hundred percent.

It won't happen at every polling location, but it will happen broadly enough to be a substantive concern regarding the integrity and validity of this election.

A scenario involving mass arrests would be much more of a declaration of conflict between the political parties and could involve false charges against members of Congress and state representatives.

But the risks are not low, and I think everyone can ascertain the clear and present concerns.

7. What are the chances that you yourself could be targeted through such a scheme of false reporting?

Answer: Significant. My cell phone appears to be a frequent target of Wifi piracy, so my communications are often faked, I presume. And, if Foundation assets have been returned or will soon be returned, then there may possibly be a high motivation to falsely implicate me for the purpose of profiteering by the Executive Branch.

8. Could such a scheme result in civil strife?

Answer: Peaceable protest is guaranteed by the Constitution. If Americans feel that their votes were not counted, then they will express their concern through peaceful gatherings, I'm sure. The key is to maintain them for enough successive days that the government has to grant concessions. One day of peaceful protests is not that effective. Ten to twenty consecutive days of peaceful protests is something that insists on a changed policy perspective. So, that's what people need to keep in mind.

Americans have a profound sense of fairness and social justice. And we're truly an impressive electorate in this regard, big-hearted and engaged and supportive and genuine.

9. Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Emails to the OIG Hotline -- Post in Progress

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 09 Oct 2026 15:17:19 +0000

October 11, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 11, 2026, sent at 2:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Confidential, sent at 12:24 PM and 2:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Pre-conditions Re: Leave. sent at 9:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Newly Notarized Affidavit for Your Office, October 11, 2026, sent at 8:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Flagstaff, Arizona, Background Information ... sent at 8:23 AM and 8:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 5:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 5:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 11, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 10, 2026, sent at 5:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: New Item Discovered Within Hotel Suite, sent at 5:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Long Term Preservation of United States Sovereignty, sent at 4:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 10, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: E..., sent at 12:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 9, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, October 9, 2026, sent at 8:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 7:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 9, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 8, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 8, 2026, sent at 8:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 8, 2026, 5:26 PM, sent at 5:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Requests for Injunctive Relief, sent at 11:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

Requests for Injunctive Relief

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 08 Oct 2026 17:16:02 +0000

1. There are allegations that someone has filed false claims against the Foundation and/or against you yourself on the basis of a crime or crimes the FBI committed in the Flagstaff, Arizona area. Do you know anything about this issue?

Answer: I truly don't. There appear to be allegations that the Foundation has been robbed due to false claims. And if that is the case, I would ask that every penny be tracked so that the funds can be reclaimed at the earliest possible time. I certainly have committed no crimes in Flagstaff or anywhere else.

2. Is it true that the FBI has been referring to Democrats as "suckers" as recently as this morning due to the agency's theft of Foundation funds as a result of the agency's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer: I cannot comment on this allegation. It appears that the FBI may have forced certain Democrats to accept misappropriated funds in an effort to exculpate the agency of later accusations of wrongdoing. This is a classic stratagem of organized crime, which forces the acceptance of funds under threat in order to obfuscate the truth. If that's true, I think pressured officials can return funds at a later date and prosecutions can proceed against the actual aggressors.

3. Have Tom Lyons, Brandan Pesa and President Trump directed the misappropriation of funds based on false accusations toward you yourself?

Answer: Well, a DEW is currently being deployed within my hotel room at the TownePlace Suites in Tehachapi, so someone has certainly extended false accusations that have not been withdrawn as of this time.

4. Are any of these men capable of supporting the sovereignty of the United States?

Answer: Let's look at their prior actions for the answer to that question.

5. What is the likelihood that these men have arranged to take your life so that they can profiteer from Foundation funds without being held to account?

Answer: That would need to be determined in a legal setting, certainly.

However, I can say that some unknown person sent a message to my cell phone asking for forgiveness this morning.

6. Are you inclined to forgive Tom Lyons, Brandan Pesa and President Trump for the alleged crimes these men have committed against your family members and yourself?

Answer: Without naming names, I will simply say that a request for forgiveness implies that there is remorse. No one should be asking for forgiveness regarding funds that have not been returned to the Foundation or false accusations that have not yet been withdrawn. That's not a request for forgiveness. That's a request for a free license to commit first degree murder and misappropriation.

7. What are the threats of a "mishap" intended to take your life today, Thursday, October 8, 2026?

Answer: I have no idea. The FBI has repeatedly threatened to blow up hotels in which I have stayed previously, so they could be recycling that plan. Or they could plan to use an autonomous sniper device within my vehicle. Or they could have placed another car bomb on the vehicle itself, similar to the one I found on my rental car on August 28, 2026. Or they could be planning a staged car accident. Or they could be planning public violence. Any and all of these criminal plans could be in place.

But again, in this instance, this appears to be a clear attempt by criminal elements to hide the evidence of their theft of Foundation funds based on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

So, I don't think it's a viable approach. If I lose my life today, then at least three individuals will be on the front lines as murderers in the public record. And, while they may not care about that in the immediate term, history will care on their behalf, and so will everyone else.

8. What about recent claims that the President is afraid of impeachment with regard to his misconduct regarding this case?

Answer: I think anyone who continues to misappropriate funds from the Foundation and anyone who continues to strive against the sovereignty of the United States is placing himself in legal jeopardy at this point.

9. You are not amenable to any negotiation with the current President or with the FBI?

Answer: You cannot negotiate with someone who wants your life. It's important to know where people are coming from in terms of their fundamental motivations. Benevolent people always want to believe that others are approaching them with a mirrored benevolence. But this is not always the case, and there are certain historical times in which we make that assumption at our peril.

In answering your question, I will simply say that I will not be conversing with anyone who intends to take my life. Absolutely not.

10. And you will not be extending a demanded "forgiveness" to those who feel guilty about their crimes associated with knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer: Again, this is a legal matter. I do advise those who have lied in a courtroom, and the FBI is front and center on this score, to withdraw their false claims and acknowledge what they have done to harm not only this case, but the larger sphere of an independent judiciary within the United States.

11. Do you grant the OIG Hotline the permission to appeal any wrongful conviction or convictions to the Supreme Court?

Answer: Yes, I hereby extend to the OIG Hotline a request for injunctive relief regarding any lower court conviction or convictions pertaining to this case.

12. Can that request be urgently pursued?

Answer: I would hope so.

13. You picked up your absentee ballot yesterday. Will you be allowed to have your vote counted in this election if the FBI and its close affiliates have extended knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against you?

Answer: If there are concealed convictions, then my vote will be discounted, certainly. And this is true for all Americans. Anyone who has suffered false accusations within a hidden dossier held by the FBI can have their vote disqualified without their ever knowing that it has happened. Law enforcement officials present in voting locations can sign false statements saying that certain voters were suspicious or had suspicious content on their cell phones or suspicious communications within their direct observation -- and that alone will likely be enough to invalidate votes.

And this has been my point for the last nine years.

We cannot expect that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting will result in anything other than corrupted elections.

We should not be surprised by this problem, and we should not expect that the FBI will exercise restraint with regard to false reporting pertaining to the midterms.

14. So, how will you move forward in casting your vote?

Answer: I am going to fill out my ballot, but I am hereby requesting an order for injunctive relief from the Supreme Court to allow my vote to be counted in light of my long term advocacy for the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, opposing unconstitutional conduct by the FBI.

15. Can the Supreme Court grant that freedom for your lawful and honorable vote to be counted?

Answer: I have faith in the Supreme Court. I think they can.

16. Will you please continue to remain in close contact with us given the extraordinary threats to your life and wellbeing you are currently experiencing?

Answer: Of course. Yes.

17. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Complaint, October 7, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 07 Oct 2026 19:51:04 +0000

OIG Hotline, please receive this complaint regarding any and all false claims pertaining to my activities, words, associations or actions vis a vis the Foundation or in any other context.

I continue to uphold the highest possible standards of conduct at all times in recognition of the opportunity to contribute to the sovereignty of the United States and the self-determination of our people.

I have made no recent political contributions to my knowledge and understanding, and any such contributions would have been extended without my awareness or consent. I cannot reference any fraudulent contributions, because Chase Bank appears to be withholding my requested credit card records at this time.

That said, I will be requesting the provision of these records once more.

In the meantime, please take any legal action necessary to protect the Foundation and related accounts from misappropriation, in addition to protecting my safety and security at this time.

Thank you for your intervention at the earliest possible time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Upholding Standards for Foundation Leadership

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:54:19 +0000

1. What is the latest attempt to misappropriate funds from the Foundation you have specified for the support of American sovereignty?

Answer: It seems as though there are false claims of communication regarding campaign finance between Democrats and myself, when those have not taken place.

2. Haven't you recently received outreach from the Trump administration?

Answer: Not that has represented dialogue, no. Having said that, I do receive emails and text messages from both Democrats and Republicans. I'm not actually able to take meetings with political figures, because the chances for misrepresentation are significant.

3. May I ask you to elaborate?

Answer: It would be relatively easy for a third party such as the FBI to state that we were discussing finances or campaigns or political maps or legislation or Constitutional Amendments or endorsements. And I am not able to engage in any of these ways.

As an example, I had outreach recently from an organization called The Grand Bargain Project. But I am not able to discuss fundraising issues with them because they are notably left-leaning. So, as much as I enjoy discussing history, government, and the sovereignty of the American people, I cannot engage at the level of discussing specific platforms, campaigns, fundraising, or any other partisan approach to the interests of the United States.

4. Didn't you make allocations recently to level out political spending regarding the midterm elections?

Answer: Only if the Supreme Court approved of that measure as a means of fully educating the American public about their political choices in November.

There are cases in which Democrats have outspent Republicans, and, conversely, in which Republicans have outspent Democrats. So, I was simply suggesting that the public have the opportunity to learn more about the candidates' policies and priorities in advance of the election. My support was entirely non-partisan.

5. Are you an independent voter?

Answer: Yes, I am. I don't think I have cancelled previous registrations, but my most recent registration is as an independent voter. And again, this is most helpful, because it allows me to support Americans' sovereignty without political bias or undue influence.

6. Have you asked for financial documentation recently from Chase Bank?

Answer: I have, yes. I asked for credit card documentation, because there has been an indication that there may have been fraudulent charges on my account without my knowledge or consent.

7. And did they supply that documentation at your request?

Answer: No, they appear to be intentionally withholding it, which certainly raises concerns.

8. Do you think there are fraudulent political donations on that credit card?

Answer: Yes, I think there may be, and I only say this on the basis of thank you messages I have received regarding donations I did not make.

9. Who would have been behind any such fraudulent donations?

Answer: Oh, the FBI and its affiliates, without question.

They have waited for a time when I'm traveling, and then they have exercised their prerogative to withhold records from me. So, the conduct is limited to only a few powerful agencies, with the FBI at the top of the list.

10. You need a bit more time to obtain the records in question, apparently.

Answer: Yes, in the face of FBI obstruction, everything takes more time.

11. But in the meantime, the FBI may be accusing you of collusion in which you have not participated to any degree whatsoever.

Answer: You know, this is the great challenge at hand. The FBI is both the arsonist and the firefighter. FBI personnel are both committing the crimes and then subsequently "discovering" them. Whether we are talking about Flagstaff, Arizona or a credit card account, the agency is acting in criminal and predatory ways toward the American public. And then, remarkably, every crime committed by the FBI is subsequently projected onto innocent Americans. So, the agency represents one big tautological trap of falsified law enforcement reporting. Everyone has a fake dossier of "crimes" of which they know nothing, often backed up by AI representation of their image and voice.

So, the FBI has become an exceptionally dangerous threat to American sovereignty.

And we really have no plan to unwind these corrupted programs as of yet, with our opportunity to intervene in these compromised initiatives rapidly receding.

12. You have shopped for a car recently. Did you buy one?

Answer: No. The FBI was using my visit to a car dealership to further knowingly false claims, so I did not pursue this possibility, even though I do need a safe vehicle to drive.

The sovereignty of the United States is more important than my car at this moment.

But obviously, I can best support that sovereignty if my safety and security are maintained.

13. Do you feel that the Foundation will be preserved in light of these disclosures?

Answer: I think it must be preserved, yes.

14. Have you maintained all requirements for foundation leadership in general?

Answer: I have endeavored to scrupulously maintain all requirements, yes. I am exceptionally careful about my conduct, my communications, my activities, every initiative I undertake.

I know that everything I do can have tremendous repercussions regarding Americans' future freedoms, so I take that responsibility seriously and I manifest it as my first priority.

15. Do you hope to have the opportunity to intervene on behalf of American sovereignty over time?

Answer: I do.

16. Will you please remain in close communication with us, given the fact that there seem to be mounting pressures regarding your case and the implications of your case?

Answer: Yes, of course.

17. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Emails to the OIG Hotline

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:48:02 +0000

October 8, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, October 8, 2026, sent at 8:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 8:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Scientific...., sent at 5:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 8, 2026, Confidential, sent at 4:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 7, 2026, sent at 3:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 7, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Allegations of Non-conventional..., sent at 7:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Voice to Text Dictation..., sent at 7:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Complaint, October 7, 2026, sent at 12:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Upholding Standards for Foundation Leadership, sent at 9:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, October 7, 2026, sent at 8:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 6:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 6:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 7, 2026, sent at 6:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Dog Park, sent at 6:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd 30/55, sent at 6:35 AM and 6:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 6, 2026, sent at 6:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

Important Additional Change to Funding Allocations

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:46:35 +0000

OIG Hotline, in order to prevent pressure on your Office by the FBI, affiliated agencies, and/or organized crime, I am hereby withdrawing at this time the clause in my finances affidavit which allows the current lead investigator in my case to increase funding by up to 50% of the original allocation for any and/or all initiatives budgeted at 1T or below.

I will make this change in future affidavits. However, for the time being, this document is to serve as legal and binding and is to replace the previous clause addressing this issue.

Thank you for allowing me to make this change to my documentation.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Change to Funding Allocations

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 20:54:03 +0000

OIG Hotline, at this time, I will be excluding space related initiatives from those for which the OIG Hotline has the authority to increase funding by up to 50 percent. Further, I am limiting funding for space related initiatives to 500 B at this time. This change will be reflected in my next affidavit for your Office. In the meantime, this is to be considered a legal and binding document.

This is due to the fact that two individuals have manipulated certain initiatives in improper ways. If potential increases in funding for other initiatives are resulting in extortion by organized crime, I will need to make further changes as well.

Beyond this, certain individuals appear to have colluded in a plan to remove certain members of the OIG Hotline from their positions of authority in overseeing this matter.

If I need to make further changes to ensure that honorable conduct is upheld and preserved in this case, I will do so.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

The Loss of a Child Is Not "Math." The Loss of Our Greatest Gifts Is Not "Collateral Damage."

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 19:22:31 +0000

OIG Hotline, please accept this complaint against the FBI and its affiliates with regard to alleged false accusations pertaining to the loss of a child's life (It is unknown to me whether this referenced child was a boy or a girl.) in or around the area of Flagstaff, Arizona. I have asked your Office for verification of the fundamental facts of this situation, and I am not yet in receipt of that information. Having said that, if the FBI has indeed harmed a child in the Flagstaff, Arizona area with the intent of not only obtaining a wrongful conviction against me or another person with regard this alleged crime, and potentially with regard to previous crimes by the FBI in this case, then an immediate lawsuit against the agency and all those involved is not only appropriate, it is necessary.

Secondly, I hereby request an order of injunctive relief regarding two issues:

The FBI and its affiliates should in no way receive financial rewards for committing violence against the American public regardless of specific programs, Executive Orders, or overall mission and objectives. The lives of the public cannot become a violent video game with points, bonuses, and rewards for the murder of innocent Americans wrongfully maligned by FBI programs of false reporting. (To place this in perspective, the agency will have false reporting about any and every child it has harmed, in order to wrongfully justify its appalling predation. This information should be acquired by the OIG Hotline so that the record of this case includes the details of the FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against all Americans, including minor children.). Any and all misappropriated funds relating to false accusations in this case must be returned to the Foundation I have specified for the preservation of American sovereignty.

Any and all orders for my harm based on wrongful conviction pertaining to false evidence by the FBI, including falsified DNA evidence, should be prohibited from manifesting through an emergency intervention from the Supreme Court. I can only assist the nation's sovereignty if I am alive and well, and beyond that, free from unjustified harm and predatory conduct by the FBI and its affiliated agencies and contractors.

Thank you very much for your advocacy regarding these critical concerns.

I will close by saying the following:

This morning I received an email with the subject heading "Let's talk about the math, Lane," as if this were an opportunity for extortion by the FBI.

This is my response.

The loss of a child's life is not "math."

Those who think otherwise need to go back to school to re-evaluate the way they are looking at this situation in terms of critical moral boundaries.

If we want to do the "math," we can start by talking about AI-mediated quotas of various kinds, the totals of which I happen to know -- and not through any disclosures from any "insider" or transfer by anyone of sensitive information.

But if we want to be worthy human beings, we will look at things differently -- meaningfully, insightfully, benevolently, compassionately, and with wisdom and insight.

True leadership is about extending the wisdom we need in the time window we need it. We need not only to be right in our interventions, but we need to be right at the right time.

This is the reason I have stated that we need to work together to ensure that these interventions occur. I can best facilitate that process if I am spoken of honestly and truthfully, and if my participation is upheld in all circumstances.

A worthy nation will not emerge from our current crises by accident.

Rather, it will be created by those of us who understand that what makes humanity dignified, worthy, redemptive, brilliant, mysterious, knowing, and transformative cannot be abandoned at this crossroads.

Just as the loss of a child is not "math," the loss of our greatest gifts is not "collateral damage."

The United States will only be able to assume leadership on the global stage with regard to human potential and environmental sustainability if we comprehend these truths.

Thank you for allowing me to express these most serious concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

On the Causes of Moral Outrage

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 04:27:42 +0000

1. Evidently some of President Trump's inner circle are now stating privately that he should be in prison. Do you know what they are referring to?

Answer: There is an allegation that he approved of the FBI's murder of a first-grade child (I don't know the gender) in Flagstaff, Arizona in order to try to misappropriate funds from the Foundation. Nor, I should point out, do I know whether the allegations are legitimate.

Having said that, FBI personnel and affiliates appeared to be breaking into my apartment and placing items there that did not belong to me. When I rented a pickup truck to move some furniture, a nearly identical pickup truck appeared in the same parking spot with a child's items in the flatbed of the vehicle. So, there were details such as this that were entirely alarming.

2. Why is Tom Lyons so focused on trying to falsely accuse you of child murder?

Answer: Because this is precisely the crime he and his friends have committed. All of their worst acts are projected outward onto the innocent. And, obviously, they feel tremendous guilt over this fact. The conscience is a remarkable taskmaster, and these people are hounded by their own.

I simply need to say that I do not appreciate the projected blame, and I will not tolerate its continuation.

3. Doesn't Tom Lyons want you to approve of his candidacy for a certain position of an unspecified nature?

Answer: That suggestion has been rumored.

4. Is he going about it the right way by falsely accusing you of the FBI's most heinous acts?

Answer: Brilliant question. This doesn't quite seem logical, does it?

5. What does Tom Lyons need to do to atone for his conduct, now and in the past?

Answer: First, he should stop killing children in any setting at any time for any reason.

Second, he should acknowledge his knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting concerning genetics and whatever other false evidence he has concocted.

I have traveled all over the country during the last six months. Is Tom Lyons going to be killing a child for every location in which I spent a few days in a row? Do we need to wonder about this now?

6. How preposterous is it that Tom Lyons is extending these false accusations through concealed proceedings in a court of law in which you are not even informed of the allegations nor allowed to speak in your own defense?

Answer: The Supreme Court would not be conducting itself in this manner with regard to this case, in my opinion. So, what's really astonishing, beyond all the details you describe, is the fact that Tom Lyons is shopping for judges in lesser courts -- those who do not know his history of lying throughout this case, and those who can be easily manipulated to render a guilty verdict based on utter falsehoods and prevarication.

With regard to the concealment, this is just an unthinkable distortion of jurisprudence.

Tom Lyons won't invite me into the courtroom, because he knows he would end up in handcuffs once I had had my say.

7. What responsibility does the President bear in this situation?

Answer: The President is Commander in Chief. He knows any narrative along these lines is false. Every person involved in this deceit must be seen as bearing one hundred percent of the responsibility. Obviously, the President is uniquely positioned to bear that burden, since he is the one who authorizes false reporting initiatives.

8. What was your response to these allegations when you learned of them this evening?

Answer: Absolute incredulity. I cannot think of any situation in which someone who has extended so much on behalf of the nation has been treated so poorly by a sitting President.

9. What is the justification?

Answer: It appears to be pure avarice. The Foundation bears substantive capital which it is committed to apply to the support of American sovereignty. And obviously, there are those who would wish to privatize those funds for their own personal sequestration of power.

10. How do we know the President wouldn't use it well?

Answer: Because he is selling off the National Parks, shutting down the Endangered Species Act, and exploiting America's pristine landscapes for mining and drilling interests. He is not preserving the nation's territorial integrity as it is.

Nor do our people feel valued and upheld.

11. How do you answer the President's assertion that we have entered "the Golden Age?"

Answer: Whose "Golden Age"? I have been traveling around the country for the past six months and I can state with confidence that the American people are growing poorer.

Those who don't have their mitts on the National Treasury are struggling.

12. How do you respond to FBI threats to "turn the lights out" over a substantial part of the country if they don't like the way the midterm elections are shaping up?

Answer: I think they're quite serious. The FBI doesn't believe in democracy. Elections make them queasy. They would prefer to dispense with the entire process. They feel that planned terrorist acts serve their cause.

13. What can these people do to apologize appropriately at this juncture?

Answer: As I said, they can stop killing innocent children and then, adding insult to atrocity, blaming it on the blameless.

After that, they can acknowledge in a courtroom the specifics of their false accusations.

14. Wouldn't you appreciate a direct apology relating to Tom Lyons' misconduct in this matter?

Answer: Unequivocally. Yes. But I would immediately observe that, given Mr. Lyons' efforts to take my life, that apology would be best extended through an independent intermediary.

15. Is the FBI still considering a Peng Shuai-style "replacement" through AI-generated audio and video following violent conduct on the part of the agency?

Answer: I am informed that they are, yes.

16. And hasn't Tom Lyons really originated that whole line of attack?

Answer: This appears to be the consensus, yes.

17. What would it take for the FBI to abandon that course of planning?

Answer: Sufficient exposure would place a damper on such plans, certainly. One of the greatest concerns I have is that the FBI has obviously perpetrated this type of crime before. How many times has the FBI "replaced" American citizens with AI communications, video and audio? This is anyone's guess. But the answer is more than 100. They feel fairly confident.

18. Do you carry a sense of moral outrage over the crimes that have allegedly been committed by the FBI in the hope of the agency's profiteering from this case?

Answer: How could it be possible for good people to respond with any less? Moral outrage represents an appropriate description.

At the same time, we need to ensure that we place blame where it belongs. And that means that the FBI and the President have a lot of explaining to do to the American public regarding the allegation that these men may have harmed a young child in their pursuit of profit.

We need to be exceptionally clear that the American public is not enslaved to overseers who determine their lives and deaths with impunity and callous disregard for our humanity, benevolence, worthiness, sovereignty, and gifts.

Tom Lyons is now responsible for publicly disclosing all he knows about the false reporting in this allegation.

19. And speculation from insiders that President Trump himself belongs in prison?

Answer: Let's find out the truth of what he authorized in this situation before speculating about where he belongs.

But in general, any individual who is harming innocents for profit needs to be exposed for a predatory criminality that the public will evaluate by its moral and ethical measures that hold to the truth.

20. What about FBI programs that involve murder of the American public?

Answer: All of the atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War II's Holocaust were legal at the time or rendered legal shortly after they occurred. But the Holocaust still stands as a moral wound on humanity's shared responsibility for the deaths of innocents.

We have learned that human beings are capable of perpetrating astonishing and unforgivable wrongs when they justify those acts as necessary for the aggregation of power.

And it is precisely because of the existence of unacceptable programs by the FBI that I have made the point that we need to re-approach our current environmental crisis from a much better vantage point.

That doesn't mean the President should be authorizing the murder of children in this case, and he should not assume my silence if he does.

He will not receive that response.

21. What about allegations that President Trump will order you to be killed on the basis of his desire to avoid accountability for this latest alleged murder on the part of Tom Lyons?

Answer: There were prior allegations that Executive Orders had been extended for murders, including my own, that would allow the misappropriation of the Foundation for the profiteering of the President. So, I think this conduct needs to be regarded as part of the same case and part of the same miscarriage of justice.

22. Has the Foundation been preserved as of this moment?

Answer: I certainly hope it has. The American people deserve to know that those funds are still present in full in defense of their sovereignty.

23. And you will not be tolerating invasions of that funding for "privatization" by corrupt public officials?

Answer: I will not.

Nor will I be tolerating further predatory FBI crimes toward this innocent under the heading of this case.

Let's expose the facts of this matter and see what the public has to say about those who would so disregard our most profound bonds to one another in intentionally targeting our most vulnerable members of society.

24. What is your response to the FBI's statements about being "concerned for all involved in this tragedy"?

Answer: The FBI does not get to speak those words when the FBI caused the tragedy.

25. What is your response to those who say that things will become better regarding your case as soon as the midterm elections arrive?

Answer: With conduct such as the FBI is alleged to be perpetrating now, one month is an eternity away.

The benevolent public cannot withstand this type of malfeasance from the President and expect to remain unharmed.

26. You will not accept FBI exhortations to remain silent over these false allegations?

Answer: No one should expect silence in response to heinous crimes perpetrated by the FBI in this matter.

That suggestion is disconnected from reality, and I would question the mental health of anyone who would extend it.

I am always going to defend the innocent and the vulnerable.

If the President wants to abandon those values, he's going to need to meet the public over this issue and explain himself.

27. What can be done about Tom Lyons and his FBI cohort, a group that appears to be facilitating atrocities on a repeated basis?

Answer: These people have legal immunity, apparently. But they do not have immunity from the public's clear-eyed evaluation of their criminal acts. This conduct is completely unacceptable to any civilized society, and I ask that the facts be disclosed on an immediate basis in order to ensure that no further harm or defamation occurs.

28. What about the assertion of certain members of Russian organized crime that they are the "boss" of the nation at this point?

Answer: Let's find out how the American public feels about their alleged harm of innocent Americans. Once the facts of this matter are fully revealed to the American people, these individuals may not feel so self-assured.

How would Tom Lyons or Brandan Pesa's children respond to the knowledge that their fathers allegedly murdered children for profit?

What do they think their children's friends would say about them at school?

These men are condemning their own families to an existence of shame and regret. So I don't think this situation is so easily dismissed on the basis of legal immunity from prosecution.

Further, I will say this: if it is true that the FBI has killed a child and attempted to extend wrongful blame toward me for this atrocity, then the agency needs to extend rather limitless damages to me over the associated crimes, including defamation, with those damages to be deposited into the Foundation I have specified for the support of American sovereignty.

Beyond this, the agency can have no possibility of profiteering from misappropriations of Foundation assets in the future. Otherwise, there would be an incentive for the FBI to continue down this unconscionable path.

And we simply cannot allow that to occur.

29. It is reported that the FBI has perpetrated lethal harm of some kind toward a FlexCar vehicle that you are meant to pick up today, October 4, 2026. How are you going to address that allegation?

Answer: One monstrosity at a time. It's 5:20 AM in the morning. I need some rest right now.

30. Thank you for speaking with us this morning

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Time for the FBI to Abandon Institutional Deceit in This Case

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:02:30 +0000

1. There are reports of recent attempts to invade the funds currently within the Foundation you have established for the support of American sovereignty. What is the basis for that attempted misappropriation?

Answer: They are likely to represent a combination of lies, among them false accusations of Communism, shoplifting, human trafficking, drug trafficking, fraudulent misrepresentation, and predatory conduct toward the vulnerable.

2. How many of those accusations are true?

Answer: Zero.

3. You are currently reading a book called "Less Is More." Is the author a Communist?

Answer: He's not a capitalist, that's for certain. And I disagree with him on his points about the economy, while I am interested in his ideas about the environment.

4. Can you please expound on your thoughts regarding the capitalist economy of the United States?

Answer: Right now, it's important for us to understand that we're not experiencing a free market system, per se. AI is now integrated into American banking and shadow banking to the extent that the behavior of the bond markets, commodities and other investments is not a true reflection of Adam Smith's "invisible hand." Consumer prices also do not currently reflect a free market.

Having said that, the United States has historically appreciated the free flow of capital to support innovation, entrepreneurship, and ever-emerging technologies in the realms of high tech, biotech, medicine, scientific research, and more.

The ability to create new businesses, to contribute to new aspects of American culture through the arts and communications, to establish new frontiers for human development through science and technology -- these are part of the American ethos which claims not only that Americans have a gift for creating new intellectual property and proprietary technology, but also that, through that same process, for reinventing themselves.

We view our proprietary inventions as so central to our experience of life that they are part of our identity.

That's part of what makes Americans unique and industrious and driven and insightful and rare. We don't want to give up our invaluable ways of interacting with the wider world.

5. So you believe in the free market.

Answer: Yes. If we want innovation and creation and human development, we need to support the free market.

The key is going to be to task the free market with solving our environmental challenges. The solutions in that realm may require advanced economies to consume less over time, so we need to consider the free market economics of sustainability as a high priority.

6. You don't sound like a Communist.

Answer: I am not a Communist. I believe that Americans have a proprietary interest in and right to their own inventions, and that no one else, including the FBI, has the right to misappropriate their intellectual property and sell it to the highest bidder on the international market.

7. Are you guilty of any of the other accusations the FBI has fabricated regarding this case?

Answer: No, I am not. I am a highly honorable person, and I think this should be obvious by this time, given my attempts to support United States sovereignty.

8. So, can the current false accusations be seen purely as an attempt to misappropriate Foundation funds and funds that are owing to the Foundation?

Answer: Yes, I think it is clear that the FBI's lies in this case have been inexcusable. They have been motivated entirely by money.

9. Are you of a mind to overlook missing funds or redacted records?

Answer: Missing funds and redacted records are highly likely to result in the strengthening of the enemies of American sovereignty.to the point that individual sovereignty cannot be reasserted. There's simply a point at which privatization of wealth becomes so egregious as to foreclose all possibilities of the public's future freedom. So misappropriations at this time cannot be tolerated.

10. Will the Congress and the Supreme Court offer their support in this regard?

Answer: I am confident that they will.

11. And you yourself will insist that funding and documentation be complete.

Answer: Yes, I am insisting.

12. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

2. How many of those accusations are true?

Answer: Zero.

3. You are currently reading a book called "Less Is More." Is the author a Communist?

Answer: He's not a capitalist, that's for certain. And I disagree with him on his points about the economy, while I am interested in his ideas about the environment.

4. Can you please expound on your thoughts regarding the capitalist economy of the United States?

We view our proprietary inventions as so central to our experience of life that they are part of our identity.

That's part of what makes Americans unique and industrious and driven and insightful and rare. We don't want to give up our invaluable ways of interacting with the wider world.

5. So you believe in the free market.

Answer: Yes. If we want innovation and creation and human development, we need to support the free market.

6. You don't sound like a Communist.

7. Are you guilty of any of the other accusations the FBI has fabricated regarding this case?

Answer: No, I am not. I am a highly honorable person, and I think this should be obvious by this time, given my attempts to support United States sovereignty.

8. So, can the current false accusations be seen purely as an attempt to misappropriate Foundation funds and funds that are owing to the Foundation?

Answer: Yes, I think it is clear that the FBI's lies in this case have been inexcusable. They have been motivated entirely by money.

9. Are you of a mind to overlook missing funds or redacted records?

10. Will the Congress and the Supreme Court offer their support in this regard?

Answer: I am confident that they will.

11. And you yourself will insist that funding and documentation be complete.

Answer: Yes, I am insisting.

12. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: October 1, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 01 Oct 2026 15:54:44 +0000

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline -- Post in Progress

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:18:02 +0000

October 5, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Reference, sent at 6:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
Five additional documents sent prior to 6:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 4, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Dental Details, sent at 5:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Important Additional Change to Funding Allocations, sent at 3:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Change to Funding Allocations, sent at 2:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Reiterating the Preservation of an Important Authority, sent at 1:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Item Not Belonging to Me..., sent at 1:00 PM and 2:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Complaint; Request for Injunctive Relief, October 4, 2026, sent at 12:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Let's Verify the Facts, Please, sent at 10:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits, October 4, 2026, sent at 7:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 6:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, October 3, 2026, (October 3 at 8:35 PM and October 4 and 5:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time).
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 4, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: On the Causes of Moral Outrage, sent at 5:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

October 2, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Thank you for the wam welcome to TownePlace Suites..., sent at 9:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding October 2, 2026, sent at 9:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, sent at 9:07 AM and 9:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Time for the FBI to Abandon Institutional Deceit in This Case, sent at 8:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Confirmation of Your Individual and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 7:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: (Proof)... sent at 7:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Statements from LM/CEVH, October 2, 2026, sent at 7:07 AM, Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: 451 at the Lowest, sent at 6:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Requested an Alternate Hotel Room in Order to Avoid Repeated "EM Sink" Shock, sent at 6:18 AM, Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 2, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:01AM, Pacific Daylight Time.

October 1, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: New FlexCar Onboarding, sent at 8:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Withdrawal of Real Estate POAs, sent at 6:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Can the FBI Be Brought to Heel on Banking and Financial Institutions in This Case?, sent at 11:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting, October 1, 2026, sent at 8:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 8:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 8:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signed and Dated Documents for Your Office, sent at 8:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Housekeeping, TownePlace Suites; Mountain Top Storage, Tehachapi, September 30, 2026, sent at 7:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief Re: Daily Notarized Affidavits, sent at 7:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, October 1, 2026, Confidential, sent at 6:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Totally...., sent at 5:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for shopping... sent at 2:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding September 30, 2026 and October 1, 2026, Through 1:52 AM, sent at 2:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 30, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Edison, September 29, 2026, sent at 1:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Parker's Boat Yard..., sent at 1:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Express Permission to the OIG Hotline Regarding Email, sent at 1:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, sent at 8:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Privacy Request ...., sent at 12:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Poppy and Birdie Update, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Feedback Regarding Additional Security Measures, sent at 7:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent... sent at 5:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 5:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 30, 2026, Confidential, sent at 5:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Medical Update, Confidential, sent at 5:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding September 29, 2026, sent at 5:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

The Ten

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 29 Sep 2026 22:16:55 +0000

1. What are some of the most heinous things President Trump has done regarding your case?

Answer: Recently? He authorized the placement of an electro-magnetic sink at a rental property I was considering, planning for my murder through its deployment.

2. What is an electro-magnetic sink and why is it dangerous?

Answer: There are conditions under which, when combined with other DEWs, it can cause a fatal electric shock very reliably.

3. So, it's an electrocution.

Answer: It is, yes. An electrocution that the victim has no advance warning about, under ordinary circumstances.

4. Was the FBI fined heavily for its participation in this scheme?

Answer: Very.

5. Did the agency learn its lesson?

Answer: Apparently not, because the agency, as of last night, set up the same equipment at my hotel, the TownePlace Suites by Marriott in Tehachapi, California.

6. They set up another electro-magnetic sink in order to cause fatal electric shock to you in your room?

Answer: Yes, they did.

7. Will you ask for injunctive relief pertaining to this follow on crime by the FBI?

Answer: Yes, I will.

8. So, the agency learned nothing from the first incident.

Answer: Apparently not. They wanted to repeat themselves and see whether they could get away with it the second time around.

9. How could the OIG Hotline ascertain the truth of this matter?

Answer: My understanding is that the military personnel supervising the equipment set up are the same. It's a little bit of a sophisticated technical problem, and not everyone can ensure that the electric currents are sufficient for the fatal shock to occur.

There is Dodge Ram pickup truck 42784L4 which the OIG Hotline should track. There are overlaps with the last attempt. So, I think the circumstances will become clear.

10. Are you filing a complaint regarding this issue?

Answer: Yes, with this dialogue. And I am herewith immediately claiming any and all penalties for the Foundation I have specified to protect American sovereignty.

11. May we turn to your car for a moment?

Answer: Please go ahead.

12. You have been informed that an autonomous sniper device has been placed in your car, intended to fire when you are stopped at a traffic light. Is this so?

Answer: Yes, apparently, the FBI has placed it inside the upholstery of the driver's seat. So, it's directly behind me the whole time I am driving.

13. You spoke about this for the first time yesterday, and today, your car has suddenly been recalled.

Answer: That's true.

14. What are the chances that that recall was entirely coincidental regarding the illumination of this matter?

Answer: Zero, in my opinion.

15. Did FlexCar, which is your car subscription service, knowingly place your life at risk by providing you with a car that had an autonomous sniper device placed inside it before you picked it up?

Answer: This appears to be the implication, yes.

16. Has FlexCar diminished in your eyes because of their failure to protect you in this important incident?

Answer: That would be a fair observation. Who would want to rent a car through a subscription service like FlexCar knowing that, even on one occasion, they accepted pay from the FBI to perpetrate murder against an honorable American human rights advocate within the United States? That would dent their business model, certainly.

All business is conducted on a basis of trust, and FlexCar seems to have proven that it has no respect for its customers, unfortunately.

Now, they want the car back before the device can be recovered by others.

17. Turning to another subject for a moment, the FBI has threatened to contaminate your food with psilocybin at every opportunity. What is the agency thinking regarding this matter?

Answer: They have allegedly harmed both of my sons with this methodology through their PsyOps division. They basically try to cause psychotic breaks among their sane critics, after which they call them mentally ill and justify yet further physical injury.

18. So, it's a plan of murder, essentially, with a quick stop along the way for a false diagnosis of mental illness.

Answer: Yes, that's accurate.

19. In this case, are they trying to diagnose you as mentally ill so that they can misappropriate funds under the auspices of the Foundation?

Answer: Yes, that's exactly what they are attempting.

20. Have they already stolen funds on that basis?

Answer: I'm under the impression that they were blocked on this occasion, even though they were reportedly wielding an AI-generated film bearing my likeness in which I was supposedly crawling and weeping through a laundromat.

21. Did that strike you as odd?

Answer: The allegation certainly bore no resemblance to my experience. So, yes, it seemed remarkably odd.

22. What is President Trump's culpability regarding all of these plans?

Answer: The buck stops with the President. So his responsibility is 100 percent. He has authorized the plans, and he is culpable of their implementation.

23. President Trump is allegedly worried about impeachment at this point.

Answer: So I understand.

24. May I know your thoughts about this possibility?

Answer: He has allegedly stolen at least three trillion dollars from this case in order to privatize those funds as his own family's personal assets. And now he is threatening to fire the lead investigator within the OIG Hotline so he or she cannot hold him to account regarding this matter. If either one of these allegations is true, then I understand why he may fear impeachment.

25. You have recently stated that you believe there needs to be campaign finance reform that would free our elected representatives from the control of those who are managing election finances at the state and federal levels.

Answer: Yes, I think those running for political office at the state and federal level can be rendered free of the burden of fundraising in order to focus on their constituents and their broader policy initiatives. And I think the nation would be much better off if we are able to implement this change across the board.

26. Returning to the OIG Hotline for a moment, how important is it that the staff members be free from the threat of job loss?

Answer: It is critical to the whole nation, frankly. These people are central to our ability to preserve United States sovereignty. And this is not an overstatement.

27. You insist that the OIG Hotline have job security, as well as personal health and safety on a daily basis.

Answer: I do.

28. Has the President also targeted the OIG Hotline through PsyOps and other predatory initiatives?

Answer: There is an allegation that ten people are currently being targeted, including at least two within the OIG Hotline. So, this is completely unacceptable.

29. Are the allegations true that the ten include three Supreme Court Justices who have ruled consistently in your favor regarding your case?

Answer: I cannot conjecture about that allegation, but I find the mere suggestion to be extremely disturbing.

30. Is the FBI attempting to control the rulings of the Supreme Court through unconstitutional intimidation and threats toward Supreme Court Justices?

Answer: I think Congress needs to ask them this question, and right away. Supreme Court decisions being made now will affect our nation's sovereignty for many generations. So we owe a debt of gratitude to those who are courageously holding the line on behalf of the freedom of the American people. That includes Supreme Court Justices, and it certainly also includes the OIG Hotline.

31. Can the safety of these ten critical people be restored?

Answer: That's what we're about to find out. I can only say that I am insisting on it, and I won't stop insisting until the FBI learns that it must relent.

32. Are your family members being affected by this targeting?

Answer: Yes, and I would expect that the family members of all ten people are being targeted as well.

33. In a word, how would you characterize that conduct by the FBI and those authorizing the FBI, including the President?

Answer: Unconscionable.

34. Given the extraordinary threats to your life from the FBI, including the firing of two bullets in your proximity the day before yesterday, will you please keep in close contact with us?

Answer: Yes, certainly.

35. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon, and please travel carefully through the wider world.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Assistance from Congress and the Supreme Court in Preventing Misappropriations

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:29:30 +0000

The total funding of the Foundation is here redacted, though this amount is included within an email to the OIG Hotline, sent on September 29, 2026 at 7:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time. Further content is also here redacted in order to respect critical boundaries.

Please be informed that I have no source of information from within the FBI or among its affiliates regarding any aspect of my case.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

*************************************************************************

OIG Hotline, this communication is to confirm that I am doing all I can to prevent misappropriations from the Foundation and related activities at this time.

My understanding is that the Foundation should contain at least xxx x at this juncture. Please ensure that that continues to be the case, allowing for the provisions I am specifying for your Office to oversee.

I respectfully ask everyone to honor the fact that the Foundation is intended to preserve American sovereignty at all times. The resources in their entirety will be needed so that we can invest, innovate, and solve problems prior to the emergence of crises that are too intractable to be surmounted.

A missing trillion here or there has the potential to doom American sovereignty by funding a functional oligarchy which has every motivation to oppose democratic self-governance in the future for the United States. Intelligence, surveillance, and defense technologies are now sufficiently advanced that extreme levels of wealth, aggregated by a few, can doom the possibility of self-determination for the country as a whole.

The public has no defense against the "usurpation of the people's sovereignty" through a "coup from above," as the author Shoshana Zuboff described.

The current threat from the Executive Branch, through the Attorney General, to fire certain staff members of the OIG Hotline if they do not permit misappropriations of funds from the Foundation and related activities of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting is unacceptable.

(redacted content)

I respectfully ask for the support of Congress and the Supreme Court in ensuring the highest ethics and integrity regarding this matter.

Thank you for allowing me to express these serious concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

A Supreme Court Inquiry Regarding Impartial Support for Free and Fair Elections

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 27 Sep 2026 10:51:46 +0000

OIG Hotline, given that there is a high degree of variability in communication strategies within Congressional campaigns at this time, and given that races are often unmatched in their efforts to reach the electorate with their priorities and approaches, I would ask the following:

Because the Foundation is intended to support United States sovereignty and to be non-partisan in that effort, does the Supreme Court believe that it would be unbiased to provide campaign finance sufficient to even out the spending of the two leading candidates in each Congressional race when spending is analyzed over the past six months? Perhaps the same thing could be done for state legislatures? If the Supreme Court feels that this would benefit voters across the board, then I could provide an allocation of up to 2 billion dollars for this purpose. An additional allocation of up to 200 million dollars could be dedicated to the provision of information to all Americans regarding their voting rights and the means of ensuring that they exercise those rights with confidence, knowledge, and up-to-date information regarding preparedness, thoroughness, and safety connected to voting in the midterms.

I do realize that sometimes Democrats are outspending Republicans and sometimes Republicans are outspending Democrats pertaining to specific Congressional contests this year.

But would it not support United States sovereignty to ensure that the public learns as much as possible about the choices they have in voting in the upcoming midterm elections?

Part of United States sovereignty is supporting free and fair elections that ensure that voters are fully informed regarding candidates' positions and priorities.

So I would like to know whether the Supreme Court feels that the approach described herein is supporting this shared goal.

If the Highest Court approves of this initiative, please ensure that it is implemented as soon as possible.

If the Supreme Court has objections, on the other hand, then we ought not to proceed, and I would respectfully request to be informed.

Thank you for your efforts to extend this inquiry at the earliest possible time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Emails to the OIG Hotline - Post in Progress

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 26 Sep 2026 13:09:52 +0000

September 28, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Vitamins, sent at 3:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Foundation Details, Confidential, sent at 2:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: The $680.68 you've given to support..., sent at 1:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Background: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, September 28, 2026, sent at 9:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, September 28, 2026, sent at 9:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 8:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 7:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 28, 2026, Confidential, sent at 7:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding September 27, 2026, sent at 7:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 27, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: ... Confidential, sent at 9:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Update Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, September 27, 2026, sent at 9:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 9:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, September 27, 2026, sent at 9:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 5:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 27, 2026, sent at 5:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Supreme Court Inquiry Regarding Impartial Support for Free and Fair Elections, sent at 4:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 26, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: The UPS Store... Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
Confidential Notes to Myself Re: Health Documentation, sent at 10:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Your Independent and Sovereign Rights, Confidential, sent at 9:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 9:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 26, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, September 26, 2026, sent at 9:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
Re: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief Regarding Five or More, September 26, 2026, 5:57 AM, Confidential, sent at 6:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding September 25, 2026 Until the Current Time, sent at 3:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

If Obstructed, Please Hire Foundation Staff to Stand Independent of the U.S. DOJ

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:40:14 +0000

OIG Hotline, if you are being obstructed in following my wishes regarding the management of the Foundation, please hire a Foundation management staff of the highest character and integrity, separate and apart from the U.S. DOJ, to remove Foundation assets from the auspices of the U.S. DOJ and to manage designations and allocations according to my directives and with your regular oversight and assistance.

If you ever feel that said staff is not meeting your requirements, you have the power to dismiss them and hire replacements.

Critical concerns at this moment in time relate to the fact that assets remaining within the auspices of the U.S. DOJ appear vulnerable to misappropriation resulting from violent conduct by the FBI and its affiliates.

For the record, I am soon to leave my hotel room with my dogs, and I have had extensive threats of a car crash relating to spontaneous acceleration due to alleged FBI/FBI contractor tampering with my vehicle. So, too, I have had extensive threats of sxxxxx vector deployment within my hotel suite, the results of which are also intended to be fatal.

So, the FBI is not halting its predatory crimes, and the prospect of misappropriation of funds appears to be the prime motivator.

As a result, we need to take the Foundation's assets out of the FBI's view as soon as possible, rendering them inaccessible to predatory invasion.

As I have mentioned many times. Foundation assets should not be ending up in the pockets of A's cadre, Vladimir Putin, or Xi Xinping. Yet to a certain degree, this has already occurred.

The architecture of this case needs to change, so that FBI predators cannot profit from their crimes with impunity.

Thank you for assisting with this important change to the manner in which this case is being treated by the FBI at the current time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Email Signature

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 25 Sep 2026 18:31:39 +0000

OIG Hotline, in order to ensure that there are no questions about my identity on documentation provided to your Office and to others relating to this case, I have created a new gmail signature today that reads Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen. This signature appears as follows:

Thank you for allowing me to extend this update for your reference.

I have restated my claim of all awards pertaining to knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting through this blog and via separate email to your Office, bearing this signature and dated September 25, 2026.

My prior claims remain valid, but I feel that this adaptation adds further weight to my ongoing communication regarding this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: September 25, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 25 Sep 2026 18:19:11 +0000

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Verification of My Signature

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:39:15 +0000

OIG Hotline, this afternoon, I notarized two affidavits for your Office by identifying myself as "Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen." I uploaded my birth certificate and marriage certificate for the notary, and I used my passport for identification as well.

My signature today used a thick online pen, so the writing appeared somewhat cramped. Having said that, the following was my genuine signature.

Please note that I have not used this particular signature for any other documentation today outside of the two affidavits referenced, one regarding "Finances" and the other regarding "Character and Conduct." Neither have I used this signature prior to today, as I created it online this afternoon.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this verification.

Please convey that anyone with questions can contact me directly concerning this matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: September 24, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:15:49 +0000

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen

Update on September 24, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:29:13 +0000

OIG Hotline, I stayed within the Hotel suite yesterday due to threats appearing to allege a deployment of fxxxs to my Hotel room during any absence. Obviously, that is a time-limited stratagem, but one that served me in the short term.

Other threats of concern referenced stepped-up aggression toward multiple people working on this case, not merely myself, with allusions to the KKK and fxxx deployment against multiple people. In addition, there was a reference to the "radium girls," which is usually an indication of ionizing radiation exposure, in addition to apparent mentions of thyroid targeting.

Mentions of acute illness including plague, bird flu, rabies and pneumonia have also been mentioned.

Further, threats of paralysis and becoming wheelchair bound appear to have been extended pertaining to staged auto accidents, remotely deployed vehicle airbags, explosive devices, MS, Parkinson's disease, ALS and more.

Finally, threats of illness, including dementia, due to gxxxxxx tampering appear to have been expressed. Aligned with disability due to dementia, there are also mentions of cadmium poisoning and airborne aluminium ion dissemination.

The FBI, which appears to conceive of itself as engaging in "entrepreneurial activity" through the torture and harm of law-abiding Americans, seems to be angry over a perception of exposure of agency wrongdoing and attendant humiliation, accompanied by a perception of "loss" of agency control over funds which are to be dedicated to American sovereignty.

Please ensure that all those working on this case have access to the above information.

I regret that this list is not complete.

Certainly, no one involved in the protection of American sovereignty through support of this case should be experiencing illnesses or accidents at this time.

I recognize that those laboring in support of American freedoms within this case are demonstrating extraordinary fortitude, commitment, dedication, courage, and insight regarding all that is at stake for our nation, our people, and our shared future as a direct result of the sovereignty crises now faced by our nation.

Though I have never had the honor of meeting OIG Hotline personnel, I will simply express once again my gratitude for their presence.

The United States is privileged to have their advocacy in this matter, and I am deeply grateful for their insistence regarding the importance of this case.

In order to enhance the job security of those within the OIG Hotline who have labored, at great personal risk, over American sovereignty during recent years, I express the following:

Regarding the lead investigator on this case within the OIG Hotline, and her/his right-hand protege, if one or both of them are forced from their employment within the U.S. DOJ against their desire, I direct that she/he/they assume a management role over the Foundation (and subsidiary foundations), while still allowing me to serve as leader of the Foundation (and subsidiary foundations). The first task in this instance would be the removal of all Foundation (and subsidiary foundations) funding and assets from DOJ auspices and control, so as to prevent misappropriations from the Foundation (and subsidiary foundations) in the absence of critical personnel. As manager(s) of the Foundation (and subsidiary foundations), these individuals would draw a salary from the Foundation for their ongoing efforts on behalf of the American people.

Further, if the lead investigator on this case within the OIG Hotline, and/or her/his right-hand protege, should find their work circumstances hostile, predatory, biased, disrespectful, or dangerous, and should she/he/they decide to leave the employ of the U.S. DOJ on this basis, all of the above stipulations apply. In that case, she/he or they may assume a management role over the Foundation, currently under my leadership, with their first task being the removal of Foundation assets from DOJ auspices and control, so as to prevent misappropriations in the absence of critical personnel.

In this role, she/he/they would continue to possess decision-making capability pertaining to key Foundation initiatives.

The sovereignty of the United States is not a game, and the FBI and its affiliate agencies and contractors should not be allowed to treat it as such.

The OIG Hotline continues to serve a key role in the preservation of the long term sovereignty of the United States. Yet I would hasten to point out that this gift is dependent on the high character of the lead investigator of the OIG Hotline, her/his protege, and no doubt their associates within the OIG Hotline. That integrity should be acknowledged and appreciated by the United States, in my considered opinion.

These invaluable people and their associates within the OIG Hotline should be protected against career harms on any ostensible basis.

At this moment, at least I can ensure that my confidence in these remarkable people finds immediate expression in this measure.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:36:06 +0000

September 26, 2026

Re: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief Regarding Five or More, September 26, 2026, 5:57 AM, Confidential, sent at 6:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding September 25, 2026 Until the Current Time, sent at 3:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 25, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: If Obstructed, Please Hire Foundation Staff to Stand Independent of the U.S. DOJ, sent at 5:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The Answer Is No, sent at 2:18 PM and 2:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Amazon Clarification, sent at 1:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting, September 25, 2026, sent at 11:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 9:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 25, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Documents for Your Office, sent at 8:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Health Update, September 25, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 24, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re Update, September 24, 2026, 7:14 PM, sent at 7:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Verification of Signature, September 24, 2026, sent at 3:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Affidavit Documentation: "Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen" sent at 1:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Parker's Boat Yard..., sent at 11:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates Re: Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting: September 24, 2026, sent at 11:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 24, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, sent at 10:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update on September 24, 2026, sent at 9:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 23, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Prevention of Gratuitous Suffering, Confidential, sent at 7:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Potential License Plates Pertaining to Unspecified Electrical Work at Tehachapi Hotel and Rental House, sent at 12:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Potential License Plates Pertaining to Unspecified Electrical Work at Tehachapi Hotel and Rental House, sent at 12:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of Awards Extended Through All Government Agencies and Affiliates, sent at 11:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, September 23, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:12 aM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding September 22, 2026, sent at 10:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your City of Tehachapi public records request ... , sent at 10:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Two Newly Notarized Affidavits for Your Office, sent at 10:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Fwd: Notes to Myself Re: "Electro-Magnetic Sink," sent at 8:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

September 22, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Resume, sent at 7:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time (This is regarding someone else's resume, not mine.)
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Verifying Closure of APS Account... sent at 5:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Request for Injunction Re: The Complex Considerations Within Universal Jurisdiction, sent at 5:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Respecting the Sentinel: Avoiding Another Fukushima Through a U.S. Leadership Initiative, sent at 1:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time.