Lane von Herzen

We Need to Talk About Ben Sasse

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:25:00 +0000

1. Ben Sasse, a former Republican senator, was recently interviewed in the New York Times regarding his terminal cancer diagnosis. But, on reading the interview, you found some concerning details that, in your view, require broader attention. Could you expound on those specifics, please?

Answer: First of all, I would like to express my concern for Ben Sasse and his family at this time. This is a person who has dedicated his life to the service of others and someone who has engaged with public life with a rare compass of ethics and integrity.

2. But you find some of the details of his illness to be unusual.

Answer: I do, and I think Congress will find them unusual as well.

3. What are those details, please?

Answer: Ben Sasse was diagnosed simultaneously with pancreatic cancer, lymphoma, liver cancer, lung cancer, cancer of the blood vessels and more. This is an unlikely presentation when it comes to terminal cancer diagnosis, and it generally represents a deadly exposure to radiation or a powerful chemical carcinogen. We just don't normally see people being diagnosed with unrelated cancers simultaneously. When we do see it, there is a reason. This is not merely "the luck of the draw" or compromised genetics. There is likely to have been significant harm to the environment of the patient, and an inquiry into this matter should be undertaken by the Congress as a whole, in a bipartisan way, because this particular instance is so grievous.

4. What should Congress do as a start to assess what has happened in this situation?

Answer: Congress should pull Ben Sasse's FBI file immediately.

5. How do you know that former Senator Ben Sasse has an FBI file?

Answer: Everyone has an FBI file. All Americans. Even minors. This is what I have been trying to convey through my discussions on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates. If you think you're the exception, you're wrong. If you think your spouse is the exception, you're wrong again. If you think your children are the exception, you're wrong three times over.

6. Do you have any idea what former Senator Ben Sasse's FBI file might contain?

Answer: The FBI labels every American of faith as a religious extremist, so I can guarantee that much is there. So the honorable former Senator would certainly have been mischaracterized as a "dangerous person" on this basis alone.

Having said that, there is likely to be a great deal of unrelated falsified law enforcement reporting as well.

7. Why do you say that?

Answer: The FBI likes to throw the whole kitchen sink of false accusations into the files. Espionage, Terrorism, Child abuse. Capital crimes. On the chance that any single accusation is later disproved, the agency can still claim that the "target of interest" was engaged in criminal conduct.

8. Why is former Senator Ben Sasse's case particularly important to the nation as a whole?

Answer: Because we want our elected officials to be able to speak freely about their opinions, their beliefs, their advocacy for their constituents, and their concerns for our nation as a whole. If we have reached the point at which honesty and integrity in the public sphere are answered with a concealed death sentence, extended through a hidden adjudication, then we have lost our Constitutional governance and all the critical guarantees that go along with it.

Public service cannot become the arena of personal grievance, political vengeance, and targeted harm. We need to rely on the ability of Congress, in a bipartisan way, to ensure that our elected officials, our former elected officials, and others who are advocating for the nation, are not incapacitated in retaliation for a perceived slight or a killed out of a desire to profiteer. This is unacceptable conduct for any civilized nation, and we need together to reject it outright.

Beyond this, I would point out that Americans of faith are not radicals, extremists, or terrorists, and the FBI needs to stop mischaracterizing them in these ways. The separation of Church and State means that no government body or agency should be targeting Americans for the manifestation of their religious or spiritual beliefs.

And that includes the FBI.

9. What should Congress do if indeed it is found that Ben Sasse's FBI file is filled with disinformation?

Answer: After that, Congress should inquire about any and all concealed judgments against him on the basis of this knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

Following this, members of the House and Senate should obtain all information about the means by which the FBI may have directed specific harms toward Ben Sasse and toward his family members.

10. Is there a responsibility on the part of Congress to ensure that Ben Sasse receives the best possible care at this time?

Answer: Congress needs to evaluate this matter behind closed doors. I would certainly hope that Ben Sasse's care would be prioritized under these circumstances.

Republicans and Democrats alike need to know that they are empowered to speak their minds, to help their constituents, to uphold long term human rights for Americans, and to lead with honesty, integrity, courage, and fortitude.

That means we're going to need certain changes within the FBI, because no Congressperson or former Congressperson should be suffering due to their public service. Our nation is immeasurably weakened whenever this happens.

11. Do you think both Democrats and Republicans can join together to address this particular issue?

Answer: Oh, yes. Everyone needs to express that, as our elected leaders, they are collectively insisting that their ability to exercise their Constitutional freedoms in defense of the national interest must be protected.

And the same holds true for our military leaders and retired military leaders. We don't want to see those who demonstrate the power of extraordinary character and integrity being targeted in any manner whatsoever by the FBI or any of its affiliates. We need our military to be able to hold the line in certain critical aspects of the nation's future. That means our leaders within the Congress and the military both need to reject the targeting of those who are serving or have served Americans' sovereignty and security.

12. When should this concern be taken up by a busy and overburdened Congress?

Answer: How soon is now? This is an urgent matter for all of our leaders, and it needs to be addressed immediately. Any time we have a problem with the architecture of our government, the issue needs to rise to the top of our priorities.

13. Will we be reading about this issue in the newspapers?

Answer: No, I expect that Congress will address it confidentially. But Congress, the Supreme Court and the DOJ have a critical role in ensuring that there are laws in place that protect civilian and military leaders who are advocating -- or, as in the case of former Senator Ben Sasse -- who have advocated in the past -- for the welfare of the American public and their long term human rights.

14. You have documented recently that the FBI seems to be expressing profound antipathy to American churches and houses of worship.

Answer: Yes, and that antipathy plays a role in this particular instance, I have no doubt. But Americans of faith are not insane, dangerous, delusional, or radicalized. And as Americans, we have the right to worship as we choose, with all the Constitutional freedoms that are afforded to us. Now is not the time to be relinquishing that right. Our nation is much weaker if we are disallowed from exercising religious freedom. Spiritual inquiry should not translate to an indictment. And this needs to be made much clearer to the FBI.

15. Is there anything you would like to add?

Answer: Totalitarianism can often arrive with technological advances that outpace our moral and spiritual development. Knowledge without commensurate wisdom and benevolence represents a tremendous risk for human society, and, indeed, for the world as a whole.

Right now, the FBI is wielding highly advanced tools without the insight, wisdom, and restraint that we require. And, in the realm of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, AI is increasingly being harnessed to the aggregation of disinformation about Americans and to the unseen consequences of that aggregation.

We don't currently have meaningful plans in place to deconstruct the architecture of that false reporting. These files of disinformation represent Americans' permanent records. And they may not be public, but they are determinative.

So, this represents a governmental crisis, and not only for the United States, but for other nations as well.

16. Can we change our current course?

Answer: We need to engage at every inflection point available to us. But yes, if I didn't think we could rescue human sovereignty for Americans, and by extension all those we influence, I wouldn't be striving for our future in this manner.

17. What do we need to be focusing on most?

Answer: Right now, let's focus on the good Senator Ben Sasse, and, regardless of our political views, let's see what a Congressional investigation into this matter will illuminate.

18. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline, on April 10. 11,12, 13 and 14,, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:25:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to the attention of your Office on April 10, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Signing of Listing Agreement, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:38 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Code Red Allegation, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:39 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Best Western Dos Rios Management and Best Western Management, sent at 10:39 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Austin Airport Hilton Management, sent at 9:56 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Communication to Task Rabbit Support Team, sent at 9:42 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 8:51 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Stranded Due to Apparent EV Tampering, sent at 4:33 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 10, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:38 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 11:15 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: We Need to Talk About Ben Sasse, sent at 8:33 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Document shared with you..., sent at 1:03 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Strengthening Words for My Beloved Young Man, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:21 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 9, 2026, sent at 12:03 AM Central time.

April 11, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 9:00 AM Central time.
The Need for Heightened Caution, sent at 8:56 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Code Red Allegation, sent at 5:18 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent Vehicle Charging Obstruction, sent at 4:27 AM Central time.

April 12, 2026:

Notes to Myself, sent at 10:39 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signing of L...., sent at 5:16 PM Pacific time (signature postponed while FedEx sent).
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 3:54 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Electrify America Management, sent at 10:39 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 12, 2026, sent at 8:41 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 7:15 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Please Do Not Commence Work Until I Hear from My Insurance... sent at 7:12 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Photos Fwd: ATTN: Atrium Inn's Management, sent at 7:00 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Atrium Inn's Management, sent at 3:08 AM Pacific time.

April 13, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: 2025 Chase Bank 2124 Records, sent at 1:16 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys,please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:09 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: 2025 Accounting Information for 40 Gansett, sent at 1:03 PM Pacific time. (in addition to 12:05 AM Pacific time on April 14, 2026)
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Tucson Airport Hilton Front Desk, sent at 6:25 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself Re: A Few Words About ActBlue, sent at 5:39 AM Pacific time.

April 14, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: I will call you tomorrow, sent at 12:09 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx, Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Pacific time.
List, Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Pacific time.

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline on April 7, 8, and 9, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:41:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office today, April 7, 2026.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Taskrabbit in Austin, TX, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:58 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 2:53 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change, sent at 2:42 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 2:26 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 7, 2026, sent at 5:53 AM Central time.

April 8:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, 7:32 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 5:07 PM Central time.

April 9:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 9:46 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 9:05 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Traveling Once More, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:53 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Engagement Letter; Draft Letter, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:44 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: FK Consultation Information, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:41 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Amazon Package Delivery, sent at 8:02 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Real Estate Attorney Referrals, Etc., Pertaining to... , sent at 8:00 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Referral from Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx, sent at 7:58 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Policy #1509219 Coverage of Attorney Needed Due to Third Party Malfeasance, sent at 7:56 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Additional Tax Documentation for 2025 and 2026, sent at 7:55 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Case Number 21030976 Pick Up of MB EQS 450, sent at 7:54 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Document shared with you: "45 Vista Verde Marketing", sent at 7:49 AM Central time.

A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:38:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, this is to document that current apparent threats I am receiving from the FBI include references to car bomb, hotel bomb, drone assault, staged car accident, acute illness caused by air and/or water compromise at the Airport Hilton in Austin, TX, food poisoning, heart attack, and other potentially fatal damage to underlying health.

The FBI appears to reference knowingly false allegations referencing mental illness, an irony given the documented mental illnesses of some of the personnel involved in this case among FBI personnel.

A substantive risk of false reporting appears to exist in the person of my TaskRabbit assistant, Audrey C., who is arriving shortly. I will update your Office regarding the errands she runs on my behalf.

In general, I would like to see a complete turnaround in the current conduct of the FBI and its affiliates toward my family members and toward myself.

Until there is a clear, consistent and sustained change in directives toward this agency, I am going to assume that Txx Lxxxx and his affiliates remain murderous in their intent toward my family, my friends, my pets and myself.

I don't believe that conduct will serve the corrupt objectives of this cohort, and I hope that honorable members of our government will prove me right in this regard.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:50:00 +0000

An addendum has been inserted in bold-face type below.

*****************************************************************************

OIG Hotline, it appears that I continue to be deprived of legal assistance as of this writing, so I cannot rely on legal guidance in addressing the U.S. Postal Service.

A robust and reliable mail service is critical for the sustenance of our democratic norms, including the maintenance of mail-in voting in both Democratic and Republican states. We cannot expect that mail-in voting will be preserved if the U.S. mail service is allowed to decline and fail as a public entity.

Therefore, I respectfully request that your Office allocate 109 billion dollars to clear the current debt of the USPS.

In addition, I ask that the OIG Hotline allocate a 300 billion dollar endowment, of which not more than five percent of total value is to be drawn in any given year for the purpose of ensuring that the U.S. Post Office does not incur any further indebtedness. The endowment should be invested in such a manner as to ensure retained underlying value over time, anticipating inflation, and should earn at least five percent interest income per year. The Post Office should have expert assistance in the management of this endowment.

The Post Office appears to have significant unfunded liabilities related to longstanding pension promises to its employees, and if those liabilities should exceed available funds on the basis of annual endowment interest (not to exceed five percent of total value of the endowment) and operating income, I would ask that the USPS receive assistance in addressing solvency concerns with its retirees.

The fiscal management of the U.S. Postal Service should be carefully guarded, as its failure to maintain reliable and honorable mail service, without interference or obstruction, is critical for our nation's sovereign future. A trustworthy mail service is essentially a natural extension of free speech, the right to vote, freedom of assembly, and many other liberties our Constitution clearly delineates as protected activities within the United States.

I must state that the FBI and its affiliates should be expressly excluded from co-opting the U.S. Postal Service for the purpose of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. Fake communications, false donations, forged letters as "evidence" of supposed wrongdoing by the honorable American public must be halted quite decisively.

The U.S. Postal Service should not constitute yet another way for the FBI to lie about the worthy American people.

Rather, we should ensure that the U.S. Postal Service separate itself from the FBI and its affiliates to the greatest extent possible. Mail carriers and USPS personnel at all levels should be bound by promises to uphold the Constitution, and together with that vow, they should be expressly prohibited from lying about those members of the public they serve.

This endowment is contingent upon the discontinuation of any financial connection between the USPS on the one hand and the FBI and its affiliates on the other. Individual postal workers should under no circumstances receive bribes or payoffs for false reporting for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency.

The U.S. Postal Service is intended to serve the American public, not participate in harmful conduct toward mail customers in any capacity whatsoever.

Further, it should be a federal crime for anyone to utilize the U.S. Postal Service in any capacity for the purpose of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

The FBI and its affiliates should never be enabled to cause harm to the American public through co-opting U.S. mail service, and the agency's obstruction of the normal receipt and sending of honorable mail should never be permitted.

I hope the United States Congress and the Supreme Court will render this clear to all.

This allocation is predicated on these requirements, and I will appreciate their strict observance, as will the American people as a whole.

Thank you for allowing me to specify this allocation on behalf of the sovereignty of the American people, and on behalf of our national independence which derives from our individual freedoms.

I hope this gift will make a substantive difference to our shared future.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

General George's Testimony Before Congress

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 06 Apr 2026 12:55:00 +0000

1. I would like to revisit the concerns pertaining to General George's recent departure as Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army.

Answer: Please go ahead.

2. Have you received any information that General George refused to deploy drones or explosive devices against you at others' directives?

Answer: Multiple times, yes, although I must point out that I am not in a position to confirm the veracity of those claims.

3. Have you received any allegations that General George declined to deploy various forms of violence against you, including kidnapping and sexual violence, at the directive of others?

Answer: Yes, I have.

4. And have those claims been substantiated?

Answer: The only substantiation I have of those claims is the fact that I have been fairly aggressively stalked in hotel settings since General George's departure.

5. Does this mark a change in your experience lately, given that you have been traveling since March 27th?

Answer: It does mark a notable change in my safety, yes.

6. And have you received any allegations that General George declined to deploy Pxxxxxx Program personnel against you in an assassination order when others favored that aggression?

Answer: I have.

7. Do you feel markedly more endangered since General George left his position as Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army last week?

Answer: Without question, I do. I have a strong suspicion that General George was not caving in to those who support the gratuitous harm of honorable Americans for profit and entertainment.

8. You believe he disagreed with unethical harm toward the American people -- harm that stands separate and apart from mission and objectives.

Answer: I do.

9. Is it your hope and expectation that Congress will investigate this matter thoroughly?

Answer: Yes, I would like to see that thorough illumination in closed sessions, allowing General George and other military personnel to speak freely to members of Congress about their experiences.

10. Is there further information you would like to add?

Answer: I think there are other deployments affecting my family members and myself that General George also opposed, and I hope the whole truth will be disclosed for the United States Congress as soon as possible.

My sons have reportedly been subjected to repeated sovereignty violations, so this represents an extremely serious area of concern.

As a nation, we need our military leaders to insist that military standards be upheld and preserved, even under great pressure to abandon them. So, we need to recognize that, when our military leaders are being forced to retire or resign their commissions due to ethical concerns regarding departure from mission and objectives, the circumstances for our nation are extremely serious.

We need to establish a means by which our military leaders can fully document their objections to directives that diverge from their mission and objectives in an effort to discourage civilian leaders from exercising wrongful authority.

11. Is history insistent on justice?

Answer: We always need to be careful about who is writing our history. If the facts have been documented in meaningful ways, then history is remarkably insistent on the truth.

When our leaders feel that they will be accountable to the truth of their conduct over the long reach of history, then the American people will be experiencing a higher standard of governance.

We need to do everything possible to ensure that we are supporting our military leadership in facilitating that documentation.

12. Is there critical documentation that needs to transpire with regard to the ethical stance of General George in insisting that gratuitous harm not be perpetrated in this case?

Answer: There is, without question.

13. Are you specifically requesting that Congress illuminate the ethical concerns involved in General George's departure?

Answer: I am, yes. I think his departure signals a profound challenge to the sovereignty of military leadership within the United States, and I think the American people need to come to a clearer understanding of what has occurred.

14. Is that possible to do without divulging protected information?

Answer: Congress should have access to all information about this matter, and with regard to the public, yes, a much clearer comprehension of the pressures on our top military leadership can be achieved.

15. Is there an alternative to closed session hearings regarding this matter in the U.S. Congress?

Answer: No, I don't think so. This issue is too important for half-measures or lassitude. We need Congress to take the reins here and to wield them well.

16. Will you please keep in close communication with us, given ongoing threats to your safety?

Answer: Of course.

17. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Regarding General George

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 06 Apr 2026 01:38:06 +0000

1. Quite a few military leaders have recently been forced to retire due to alleged conflicts with the Department of Defense, most recently Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Randy George, who, by all accounts, demonstrated great fealty to the President's directives. What are your perspectives about the loss of these experienced leaders from among our military ranks?

Answer: The allegation was that General George attempted to defend the planned promotion of four officers to the rank of one-star generals, although there was an alleged attempt to obstruct their advancement due to race and gender.

2. In fact, that obstruction did take place, didn't it?

Answer: I would assume so.

3. What does it say to you that qualified military personnel are being held back on the basis of race and gender at this time?

Answer: It says to me that the FBI and the CIA are pulling rank over our military leadership, frankly. Military officers and enlisted service members who are women or people of color, or both, are being overtly marginalized at this time, a change we can ultimately expect to see reflected in American society as a whole.

Those who are students of history will recognize that victimization follows marginalization, so the Department of Defense is now signaling that military or law enforcement personnel who are women or people of color will not be protected in the future.

Military leaders who stand for their own provenance over their ranks are continuing to be forced out, leading me to conclude that rules of military engagement are likely to be summarily and consistently violated by the FBI and CIA. In other words, there will be no further rules of war, consistent military chain of command, or military justice that will be recognized as valid by the intelligence agencies.

4. Is this conflict over promotions reflective of the only disagreement between General George and the Department of Defense?

Answer: Almost certainly not.

I remain deeply concerned by the architecture of totalitarianism that may not be able, through reasoned and thoughtful engagement, to be deconstructed at any time in the future.

Alongside damage to our internal military governance, civilian structures of governance will be yet further decimated, to be certain.

5. What are the risks for us?

Answer: The risks include the vast diminishment of the level of human civilization -- not merely in our numbers, but in our determination to stand separate from barbarism, and our ability to rise above barbarism once it fully manifests.

6. Do you see other warning signs?

Answer: It is notable that, whatever one may think of their performance, two high-level female staff members have recently been forced out of their positions: Attorney General Pam Bondi and Secretary Kristi Noem.

There are five other women in the President's Cabinet, but as women's human rights become more endangered within the United States, the FBI may dictate their removal as well.

7. Secretary Hegseth's minister reportedly disapproves of women's right to vote.

Answer: Duly noted.

8. Is this an insignificant detail pertaining to governance within the United States currently?

Answer: No. It represents radically regressive ideology that may well have dramatic effects on our nation as a whole.

9. How would you characterize the FBI's misogyny?

Answer: As murderous. Fairly frequently, if my hair is not perfect or I haven't applied my makeup, the FBI will send a death threat to my phone: "All dogs go to Heaven." In other words, if you're a woman, any worth you might have from the FBI's perspective depends on your attractiveness on any given day. Of course, if a woman is too attractive, she might be murdered on the basis of her appearance as well. So, the FBI regularly signals a mindset that involves the stalking and killing of women for entertainment, at least in the context of threats sent to me.

10. Do you think General George would have approved of that mindset?

Answer: I do not. I think General George likely demonstrated superior character and integrity throughout his long career, and I think he would have made that clear. Beyond that, I think his expectations for the conduct of his troops manifested meaningful standards for ethical conduct in every way possible. That personal and professional honor may have made the FBI uncomfortable.

11. What would you do if you were a member of the United States Congress at this point?

Answer: I would be interested in hearing from every high-level military leader who has been forced to retire or resign over the last year. I would want Congress as a whole to be asking difficult questions in closed sessions with these individuals so that I could gain a clear picture of what has occurred here.

I think we need to understand that when our military leaders are holding the line in matters of ethics and integrity, we need to be supporting their ongoing service to the nation.

If the FBI is even partially involved in dictating the removal of certain military leaders -- and I do believe this is a concern, given alleged communications between military intelligence and the FBI -- then we need to halt that overreach.

12. Should certain military leaders be reinstated?

Answer: Congress has a critical role to play in insisting that our military leaders have the freedom and authority to uphold ethical standards and military codes of conduct without losing their commissions. The Congress as a whole needs to determine how they will support the military leadership in this regard, but I do think they need to consider meaningful steps that will guarantee that our military leaders can safely raise objections to misconduct, overreach, or gratuitous harm.

We are depending on our military to exercise restraint when restraint is possible. That means we need to give them the standing to do so.

Without this, our whole society will suffer declines from which our long term recovery is deeply imperiled.

13. Your father served in the U.S. Army, did he not?

Answer: Yes, he did. And I think he felt that the military reinforced his sense of innate discipline and integrity throughout his illustrious scientific career.

14. Does it surprise you that our military leaders may be holding the line when it comes to critical matters being discussed behind the scenes?

Answer: Not at all. But again, we need to ensure that our elected officials defend them in turn.

15. Today is Easter Sunday. Do you have any words for us on this occasion?

Answer: Happy Easter for all those who are celebrating. We draw hope from the knowledge that, despite great travails, we can find sustenance and renewal in benevolence, generosity, compassion and abundant good faith with one another.

16. Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline on April 4, April 5, and April 6, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 06 Apr 2026 01:28:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your attention on the following dates. Please note that this list will be updated.

April 4, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 4, 2026, 9:48 PM Central time, sent at 9:50 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, sent at 4:36 PM and 7:08 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:36 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 1:32 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding April 3 and April 4, 2026, sent at 12:15 PM Central time.

April 5, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: von Herzen/MacWilliams Cape Cod Property, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:56 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 8:36 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Regarding General George, sent at 8:13 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 6:39 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: EV Charging Stop, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:21 AM Central time.

April 6, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty, April 6, 2026, sent at 9:58 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Control Over Rental Inquiries, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:36 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty, sent at 8:52 PM and 9:05 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Mooring Payment Date Discrepancy, sent at 6:56 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Mooring Questions, sent at 6:53 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Investigation; Fwd: Proposed Changes to Mooring Regulations, sent at 6:51 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats of Planned Account Invasion, sent at 3:59 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:42 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Preservation of Evidence Demand..., sent at 1:39 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 12:17 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: A Reflection on What Lasts, sent at 12:11 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: General George's Testimony Before Congress, sent at 7:57 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Front Desk Assistance, sent at 12:08 AM Central time.

What the Constitution Left Out

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 03 Apr 2026 17:45:00 +0000

Our Constitution represents a brilliant delineation of our civil liberties as Americans. Regarded the world over as a model of a people's foundational rights, it is viewed by many as divinely inspired.

Our rights to free speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom from unlawful search and seizure, freedom of religion, separation of Church and State, in addition to our rights to privacy, our rights to own private property, and, indeed, many other fundamental liberties we hold as necessary for the congress of our worthy nation, our close-knit communities, and our meaningful individual aspirations as proud citizens of the United States, are guaranteed within the Constitutional articles and amendments upon which we all rely.

The founders were balancing myriad concerns in 1787, when the Constitution was composed, including the balance between state and federal governance, the rights of slaves and the critical question of their future, the place of women in the workings of the nation, the methods by which the co-equal callings of the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government could check one another when necessary, and much more.

So, we can forgive them for what they left out. The task of identifying what is missing from the Constitution now falls to us to determine, with wisdom, courage, and clarity of purpose.

And good people, it is this:

Our rights are of inestimable worth to the future of our people and the sovereignty of our nation.

But they will all go away if we do not formalize the responsibilities on which they rely.

In addition to upholding our human rights, we must fully comprehend the requirement that we stand as much better stewards of the environment of the Earth.

Without our understanding that our freedoms depend on our responsibilities to steward the environment, we will lose everything we set out to preserve.

Without breathable air, clean water, pristine land, and a thriving wilderness, we have no rights at all -- nothing to bequeath to our children and grandchildren, no legacy we would wish to claim.

And this is the unsayable thing.

We have overtaxed the environment to such astonishing degree that we are now risking the future of humanity, and all of our beloved freedoms alongside this future.

Because we have not yet understood the seriousness of the manner in which our rights and our responsibilities are inextricably bound to one another, we are seeing serious losses of environmental resources around the globe, alarming loss of diversity of wildlife, the extinction of whole species and ecosystems which developed over thousands of years.

Humanity is part of this narrative, not separate from it.

Human populations are so high at the current time that the global environment is facing stressors that are unsustainable. And that climate crisis is happening now, not fifty years from now.

As a direct result, we are seeing broad movements toward totalitarianism worldwide. With these changes, we will experience not only a broad decimation of our human rights. Totalitarianism also brings other losses, more shocking, more historic, and more indelible.

Good people, as tragic as this territory is, it was foreseeable. And, in fact, it was foreseen.

What messaging did we need that we didn't have? We needed the military to be assigned a forward role in speaking to the American public, and indeed, to other nations, about goal-setting regarding climate markers, so that all of us could have engaged in assiduous efforts to change our way of life early and profoundly in defense of the environment as a whole.

Climate change will never be a politically easy topic for elected officials to address. The oil companies are too powerful for meaningful transitions in energy consumption to be made without de-politicizing the issue through coordination with our military leaders. Entrenched interests easily create enough uncertainty regarding climate science for the public to be distracted, polarized, and conflicted regarding critical requirements for change.

So, we needed our most respected Generals to stand before the public as early as possible in explaining that the Earth's environment doesn't care whether Americans are Democrats or Republicans. It doesn't care about our race, our gender, our religion, or our personal orientation. In making critical changes, it is our commitment to our families, our communities, our national security, and the world as a whole that matters, not the superficial differences that can serve to divide us.

Such a course of guidance from our military would not have represented an autocratic course, but rather one that assigned politically fraught but critical issues to those required to stand separate from the political sphere.

And this should have occurred beginning forty to fifty years ago.

In many ways, we required a companion document to the Constitution, one which formalized our responsibilities in reaching climate sustainability and in maintaining it indefinitely.

We still need this document to guide us in the future toward humanity's preservation, alongside the realization of our greatest potential.

Without it, we will not succeed.

At this moment, our task is to identify every possible inflection point regarding the environment's trajectory and to intervene in it with the highest quality of leadership, wisdom, commitment, courage, and integrity we can muster.

Part of that analysis involves identifying critical environmental inflection points that were missed over the past forty years.

Our current challenges are immense and immediate, but they are not insurmountable.

We need all of our talents, gifts, insights, knowledge, creativity, resourcefulness and acumen in establishing a better way forward that seeks to reclaim Americans' human rights in the long term, and that seeks to rescue our national sovereignty at the same time.

Those approaches will not be conventional, predictable or assured, just as any moonshot endeavor is not a humble or meager attempt to change the course of our reach into the future.

But they must now occupy our hearts and minds in forming our unified resolve to manifest them.

And we must ensure that we have all the resources necessary to bring them to fruition.

My case before the Supreme Court continues to gather those resources. Let's ensure that they are preserved for this most urgent task.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline on April 2 and April 3, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 03 Apr 2026 11:51:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails, sent to the attention of your Office on April 2 and April 3, 2026. Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day today:

April 2, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: VonHerzen Trust Doc, Additional Background, sent at 11:26 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Addendum to Health Update, April 2, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:01 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Alleged Tax Preparation Concern, sent at 9:05 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Property Showing This Evening, sent at 8:47 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Locked Storage Facility, sent at 6:21 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 6:06 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Request for Injunctive Relief Re: Alleged Plans for Increased Aggression from..., sent at 6:00 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Fwd: Confirmation of Our Trip Details, sent at 3:11 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:April 2, 2026, 12:07 PM Pacific time, sent at 12:54 PM Central time.

April 3, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 11:36 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Courteous Language, sent at 10:09 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 9:35 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Protection from..., sent at 2:21 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: KPM Texts, Confidential, sent at 2:05 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief Re: Propagation of DOJ Cases Relating to Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting, sent at 1:05 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: What the Constitution Left Out, sent at 12:48 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Addendum to Health Update, April 3, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:42 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Real Estate Representation, sent at 12:23 AM Central time.

Request for Injunctive Relief Re: Alleged Plans for Increased Aggression from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:54:00 +0000

1. It has been suggested that the departure of Attorney General Pam Bondi was timed to coincide with an Executive Order prohibiting the release of investigative reports to you, as required by the Supreme Court. Is this your understanding?

Answer: Yes, it is.

2. The FBI is also alleging that an Executive Order has been extended which specifically calls for your arrest on false charges. Is that so?

Answer: The agency appears to be making this claim.

3. What about threats of sexual harassment, sexual assault, kidnapping and/or first degree murder that have also reportedly been authorized at the highest level? Are those plans meant to apply to you?

Answer: This is what the FBI appears to suggest, yes. It is important for me to document that I have not received independent verification of any of the threats mentioned here.

4. Have you received any settlements associated with your case?

Answer: None.

5. Have you received any assets associated with settlements awarded to you?

Answer: None.

6. Have you received any direct communication about awards extended to you in the adjudication of your case?

Answer: None.

7. Is it possible that there is an intention on the part of the FBI to use Executive Orders to take the lives of your entire family during a period in which there is an Acting Attorney General, previously the President's personal attorney, who has been provided with immunity from prosecution regarding illegal and unconstitutional acts relating to your case?

Answer: Yes, this tactic is entirely possible. This would represent a highly opportunistic plan, and this type of high level personnel change is often something the FBI and its affiliates aggressively exploit.

8. Was Attorney General Pam Bondi holding the line regarding upholding the Supreme Court's determination that investigative reports should be released to you?

Answer: I believe she was, yes. She possessed immunity from prosecution in this matter, but she likely was unwilling to violate the Constitution by ignoring the Supreme Court ruling regarding the release of information.

9. What about Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche? Will he have any compunctions about violating the Constitution in the interests of wrongfully profiteering from your case, to the detriment of the American people?

Answer: I think some people are concerned about their place in history, because they recognize that the truth of their conduct may rise into public view. So over and above individual ethics and professional boundaries, the manner in which certain officials are shaping the history of the United States is now becoming one of urgent importance.

10. Is the FBI, along with its affiliates, effectively advancing a Russian agenda in influencing governance within the United States at this time?

Answer: It appears to be doing exactly this, much to our detriment.

11. And do you believe that the FBI and its affiliates are directing the Executive Branch with regard to the timing of Executive Orders, high level personnel changes, etc.

Answer: I do think the tail is wagging the dog in this period of time, yes. We appear to have lost sovereignty within our elected government. The FBI does not want to be held accountable to the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, the American public, the United States Congress, or anyone else. So, I expect that the agency is dictating the manner in which this case is currently being handled, including directing Executive Orders that appear to be originating with the President.

12. If this is true, then we have a corruption problem in which FBI personnel are directly profiteering from their own crimes against you and your family.

Answer: Yes. That problem appears to be front and center right now.

13. In the past, when the FBI has been caught in this level of corruption, they have resorted to heightened aggression, haven't they?

Answer: There are many instances in which this has been the case, yes. The FBI appears to believe that all of its problems can be solved by targeted assassinations toward the honorable public within the United States and elsewhere.

14. What are the odds that Vladimir Putin and other foreign adversaries may be profiteering from the raiding of awards extended to you, and the U.S. National Treasury as a whole?

Answer: One hundred percent, in my opinion.

15. What is the appropriate response from the United States?

Answer: I would suggest that the Supreme Court prevent any and all decisions from the DOJ pertaining to this case during the period of time in which an Acting Attorney General is standing in for a permanently appointed official in this critical role. If it is possible to file a request for injunctive relief safeguarding my family members and myself while ensuring the preservation of awards in this case, that would be highly appropriate. Recent physical harms, which I will delineate for the OIG Hotline in detail, should be reversed in their entirety.

Next, I would ask the United States Congress to prioritize confirmation of a candidate for Attorney General who will be bound by the requirements of the Constitution in defending the interests of national security, even when those determinations may oppose the Executive Branch.

Further, I would request that the Executive Branch withdraw any and all Executive Orders that would violate the Supreme Court's rulings in this case, that would place my loved ones or myself in jeopardy in any context, that would support the proliferation of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting within the United States or spurious investigative efforts within the Department of Justice, that would wrongfully place my records into the public sphere without my participation or consent, or that would wrongfully implicate my family members or myself of wrongdoing.

Outreach from an honorable intermediary needs now to occur, and I ask that this initiative be prioritized on an urgent basis.

16. You see the departure of Attorney General Pam Bondi as an ominous sign that you and your family members could experience greatly heightened risks to your safety and security.

Answer: Decidedly so.

17. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer: You are most welcome.

18. Please keep in close communication with us, given the circumstances at hand.

Answer: I will, of course.

Lane MacWilliams

April 2, 2026, 12:07 PM

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:07:00 +0000

1. Your sons are allegedly both being directed to perpetrate assassinations as part of the Pxxxxxx Program in the near future. Is that the case?

Answer: This is the allegation I have received, yes.

2. Are these "assignments" intended to coerce your own actions in some manner?

Answer: I have no doubt that there is a punitive component vis a vis my recent revelations about the apparent plans of the FBI and its affiliates. And certainly, the FBI and its affiliates have desired to silence me in general.

But I think it's important to recognize that these agencies appear to have asked for silence at the same time that they have furthered plans to take the lives of my whole family.

This is a consistent pattern for the FBI. The agency extends an apparent plea for confidentiality, even while plotting first-degree murder toward those who might comply.

3. Having said that, you are not disclosing everything you know about the plans of the FBI and its affiliates.

Answer: No, I'm not. I am making ongoing assessments about what disclosures are in the best interests of the nation. And if the FBI and its affiliates have forgotten their commitment to serve the United States, I have not.

4. Your younger son has been allegedly forced to engage in drug trafficking at FBI directive, and your older son has been allegedly forced to engage in weapons trafficking at CIA directive, with the CIA acting as FBI contractor in this particular case. What is the purpose of these activities?

Answer: Basically, the FBI uses the activities the agency itself has directed for the purposes of blackmail and coercion. Once the agency forces an individual to break the law in any context, FBI personnel make it clear that they can sacrifice that individual at any time by turning around and prosecuting them publicly. The agency pleads "national security concerns" before a judge, while simultaneously explaining to their victims that it is elementary for the agency to have people killed in a prison setting. And off the individual goes to jail for a long sentence.

5. In this specific case, however, you are well informed about the agency's stratagems. So doesn't that render them ineffective?

Answer: Yes, if the FBI or its affiliates attempted to prosecute my sons, they would be wading into deep waters, given the crimes the agencies have already committed against my family members. The FBI and its affiliates can threaten these steps, but I don't think they can actually take them.

The greater risk is out and out murder of my family members, and, obviously, I face the same threat myself.

6. By the FBI?

Answer: By the FBI and its affiliates, yes. The agency has made clear to me that it has bribed certain elected and appointed officials repeatedly regarding this case. So, the agency can further plans of first-degree murder by referring to legacy concerns for highly placed leaders. And this was their objective from the beginning: leverage and control.

7. What should happen to the plans of the FBI and its affiliates regarding current "assignments" to your sons and perhaps even your daughter-in-law?

Answer: They should be canceled immediately.

8. And what about the apparent demands of the FBI that you hold silent at this point?

Answer: Again, I need to point out that I am not disclosing everything I know about the FBI's conduct outside of its mission and objectives, or even its activities within the framework of its central approved tasks.

But complete silence is not possible due to allegations of ongoing attempts to harm my loved ones.

I am endeavoring to ensure that my voice reflects wisdom, courage, discernment, insight, and often restraint.

9. What is your take on the FBI's attempt to duplicate and expand on AI-generated false reporting investigative efforts as a means of inflating the currency and enriching a handful of officials who would be regularly siphoning off funds derived from spurious judgements?

Answer: This would represent an unforgivable distortion of the intent of my case, which is to defend the long term human rights of all Americans, not to render that defense impossible.

10. Does Attorney General Pam Bondi have an important role to play in refusing to allow that approach?

Answer: Yes, her role is critical. She needs to be able to insist that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting will not become further entrenched because of my case, but rather to ensure that the opposite will occur.

11. You have been traveling over the last five days, so your time has been limited. Will you now have the opportunity for more discussion about matters of importance regarding the country as a whole?

Answer: I plan to make the time expand, because these issues are so critical to our shared future, yes.

12. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

My True Potential to Help

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:29:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, my hxxxxxd and I have arrived in Austin, Texas today, April 1, 2026. I hope to evaluate the area for a stay of at least several months, longer if I am treated well here.

My hxxxxxd plans to return to the Bay Area on Sunday, April 5, 2026.

I do note that the state of Texas as a whole is conducting emergency drills tomorrow morning and early afternoon, a first as a statewide endeavor.

Texas is likely to become overtly militarized, in my opinion, in the not-too-distant future. Military, government and law enforcement officials, together with preferred business personnel, will have their safety assured.

Can I, in this environment, survive and even thrive?

It depends on whether my honor and dignity are upheld and respected.

I have been asked to stop writing publicly about the problem of the FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting at this time, although such a step would be entirely dependent on the cessation of torture toward my sons and daughter-in-law, including affiliated demands for knowingly false witness statements, whether signed electronically or otherwise.

Certainly, I would continue in any circumstance to document this case for your Office.

Having said that, the FBI appears to suggest that the DOJ is planning to expand multiple investigations of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting with the intent of radically devaluing the dollar through extending massive awards to victims, which are to be later misappropriated by government officials in wrongfully implicating the same.

I strenuously object.

My case should not be used as a model for the torture and abuse of innocent Americans.

Rather, it should be strictly limited to address my concerns for the sovereignty of the American people and the independence of the nation as a whole.

Because this is such a critical concern, I will include this communication on my blog. Once I am assured that the United States government, including the DOJ, has promised not to prey upon other honorable Americans in the same manner that I (and my family members) have been preyed upon, I will treat my documentation for your Office as direct communication.

But I will not be replaced in a government attempt to commoditize the profitable torture of innocent Americans for the benefit of their elected and appointed overseers.

That would represent such a gross distortion of the intent of my defense of the long term human rights of all Americans, it would doom the future of our sovereignty as a nation, not rescue it.

I respectfully request the support of the U.S. Department of Justice, the United States Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, and all officials involved in this matter in preventing the propagation of these wrongs toward others.

If this administration needs more information from me, then it should enable me to hire a team of bodyguards and a full-time notary public, alongside the acquisition of a protected residence and an armored vehicle. That way, I could move with greater safety throughout the wider world.

OIG Hotline, World War II was filled with examples in which the Axis powers worked prisoners to death in slave labor camps and then simply replaced them with other victims.

But my point all along has been that human beings are, by their very nature, unique, rare, and irreplaceable. Can we accept the fact that we are spiritual in our fundamental identities and also accept that we have overburdened the environment to the breaking point? Both of these realities are true.

The answers for us are not to be found in (redacted content) for the profit of a handful of individuals who oppose human sovereignty in every measure.

Rather, the answers look quite different.

I hope I will have the chance to elucidate them for a government that understands my true potential to help.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline on April 1, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:28:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see my emails sent to the attention of your Office today, April 1, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: My True Potential to Help, sent at 10:47 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Junction, Texas Hotel Stay on March 31/April 1, 2026, sent at 9:40 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: El Paso Hotel Stay, March 30/31, 2026, sent at 9:37 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Tucson, Arizona Hotel Stay, March 29/30, 2026 sent at 9:24 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Palm Springs, CA Fwd: Hotel 28/29, sent at 9:06 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Zilker Park, Austin, Texas, April 1, 2026, sent at 8:27 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Starbucks in Junction, Texas on April 1, 2026, sent at 8:09 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 7:48 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Photos Forthcoming, sent at 12:03 PM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 11:59 AM Central time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: UPDATE Re: Balmoreah, TX, sent at 11:56 AM Central time.

Emails to the OIG Hotline

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:25:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to you with date/time stamps noted herewith. The FBI appears to allege having created AI-generated communications through online impersonation of me and potentially my family members over the period of my travel, or prior to that. Accordingly, please treat with skepticism any documentation that is not noted herewith. Please reach out to me with any questions whatsoever.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

March 27, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 26 and March 27, 2026, sent at 3:19 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Vista Verde Way Valuations, sent at 9:06 AM and 11:41 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: UPDATE Re: Have Time to Meet with..., sent at 1:28 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 4:37 PM Pacific time.

March 28, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, March 28, 2026, sent at 1:07 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Autonomous Rerouting of Vehicle, March 28, 2026, sent at 6:55 PM Pacific time.

March 29, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Documentation, sent at 3:36 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: GTM Texts, March 29, 2026, sent at 11:21 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Notes, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:41 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Replacement Address within MB Operating System, sent at 11:44 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: CPR Event at Charging Station, sent at 11:47 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: UPDATE Re: Notes, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 1:35 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Suspicious vehicle at charging station 3/28/26, sent at 1:51 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Unusual Pedestrian Behavior, sent at 1:54 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Suspicious vehicle at charging station, sent at 1:57 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Car registration, sent at 2:01 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent Attempted Staged Car Accident, sent at 5:10 PM Pacific time.

March 30, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Fwd: GTM Texts, March 29, 2026, sent at 11:59 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE: Signature Re: Notes, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:01 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Fwd: Re: Replacement Address within MB Operating System, sent at 12:03 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Fwd: CPR Event at Charging Station, sent at 12:04 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Re: UPDATE Re: Notes, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:08 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Fwd:Suspicious vehicle at charging station 3/28/26, sent at 12:11 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Fwd: Unusual Pedestrian Behavior, sent at 12:12 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature: Fwd: Suspicious Vehicle at Charging Station, sent at 12:13 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Fwd: Car registration, sent at 12:15 PM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signature Re: Apparent Attempted Staged Car Accident, sent at 12:16 PM Mountain time.

March 31, 2026::

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Allegations of Refuse Tampering, sent at 4:36 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 5:05 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, March 31, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 5:57 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Keywords, Update, March 31, 2026, Confidential, sent at 10:41 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Who Is "Extreme"?, sent at 6:28 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: All Hotel Rooms Reflect Honorable Stays, sent at 6:37 AM Mountain time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 6:40 AM Mountain time.

Emails to the OIG Hotline on March 26, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:59:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to the attention of your Office on March 26, 2026. Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Amazon Delivery to Front Door, sent at 10:10 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Norm's Passing, sent at 4:03 PM and 10:14 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Follow Up, March 26, 2026, sent at 1:49 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Uncle Norm's Passing, sent at 12:12 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Norm's Passing, sent at 12:05 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond at your earliest convenience!, sent at 11:35 AM and 12:51 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 11:26 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:When the Truth Is on Trial, sent at 11:23 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 25 and 26, 2026, sent at 1:52 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for coming to the house today!, sent at 1:32 AM Pacific time. (an email to two realtors)
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: What Is at Stake for Us? Confidential, sent at 1:27 AM Pacific time.

Please also note the following email sent on March 27, 2025:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 26 and 27, 2026, sent at 2:19 AM Pacific time.

When the Truth Is on Trial

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:51:00 +0000

1. It is alleged that you have been "on trial" for the last several weeks regarding your case. Have you participated in your own defense? Have you been empowered to speak directly to attorneys defending you? Have you been able to answer false claims by the FBI?

Answer: No, I have no idea what the false charges are, and I have not been able to see the false evidence. All of this is proceeding without my input, my guidance, or my exculpatory documentation, of which I have a great deal.

2. There has been an allegation that AI-generated "deep fake" films have been presented to a Grand Jury as purported evidence over the course of this proceeding. What is your view of that suggestion?

Answer: Sometimes it seems as though everyone in the world has been privileged to see deep fake material bearing my likeness except for me.

I cannot begin to express how wrong this whole process is.

If we want to prohibit the utilization of deep fake material, both video and audio, by corrupt law enforcement agencies, then we need to actually gather the courage to show the victims what false material was created without their knowledge or consent.

Without this critical step, the discussion is moot.

In this case, there needs to be accountability that involves me, given that I have been the one affected by the FBI's crimes in this regard.

3. The FBI seems also to have alleged that the agency has put forward falsified DNA evidence of some kind. Would you like to weigh in on this allegation by the agency?

Answer: Almost everything I would say to exonerate myself is considered a "national security secret" by the FBI. If I were contacted by the Grand Jury, I would give them a sample of my DNA that dates back ten or more years, for the simple reason that any claims of differences between an older sample and current samples are one hundred percent due to misconduct by the FBI itself.

But all of that evidence would probably be presented under seal in a courtroom setting, because the FBI is quite guarded regarding its "sources and methods" when it comes to framing the innocent.

So, this is a big deal, and it should not be evaluated or resolved without my direct participation.

4. Why not?

Answer: Because without the truth of the matter, false convictions become more than a risk. They become a likelihood.

5. And what do false convictions translate to for a person in your position, who has been a tireless advocate for the long term human rights of Americans, as well as an unyielding supporter of the sovereignty of the nation as a whole?

Answer: In this case, where there is so much at stake financially given the awards that have been extended to me, false convictions translate to a death sentence.

6. A death sentence in absentia?

Answer: Yes, this is the astonishing nature of concealed judicial proceedings. The accused have no knowledge of the charges, nor do they have any opportunity to disprove them.

7. And what would happen if such a wrongful sentence were carried out?

Answer: Massive theft of awards extended to me in this case -- settlements about which I have not yet been properly informed.

8. So there is an overwhelming motivation on the part of the FBI to allege your guilt, or your family members' guilt, surrounding crimes of which you have no knowledge whatsoever.

Answer: Oh, yes. The conflict of interest for the FBI and its affiliates is astounding.

9. You have expressed a great deal of concern regarding the FBI's establishment of the architecture of false reporting for the nation, because these structures will be exceptionally difficult for us to unmake later.

Answer: I have, because falsified law enforcement reporting is not needed for the FBI's mission and objectives. Rather, it represents the architecture of totalitarianism, and, because of the manner in which AI is generating false information about all Americans, we need to be deeply concerned about the ways in which these falsehoods will be misused in the future.

If you knew that the FBI could falsely accuse you of the most serious crimes possible at any time, would you still exercise free speech?

Most people, understanding the danger, would not. So, the fundamentals of our freedoms are dismantled by falsified law enforcement reporting. The Constitution is simply erased as an enforceable document under these circumstances.

And that is the intent of falsified law enforcement reporting: total control over the public at all times.

Remarkably, it's not the most dangerous sovereignty violation for the nation. But all by itself, it represents a stunning violation of the human rights we hold sacred. So, we need to consider if this is the best we can do for our family, our friends, our neighbors, our nation and ourselves.

I think we're worthy of much better governance.

But we need to engage with this issue or the inflection point will pass us by.

10. What does that mean in terms of your "trial" about which you know no substance?

Answer: It means that I had better be exonerated of all wrongdoing, as should my family members. And it means that if that doesn't happen, I should be contacted right away in order to participate in my own urgent appeal.

It also means that I need to be provided with outreach, investigative reports, and awards extended to me so that I can make the difference for the nation that I am intended to make.

11. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

A Request for an Appeal, If Appropriate

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Wed, 25 Mar 2026 03:34:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to allege that a "kill order" has been extended by this administration toward my family members and/or myself.

I am not aware of the false allegations that are meant to have justified any such wrongful directive.

The FBI appears to suggest that profiteering stands as the primary motivation for intentionally falsified law enforcement reporting related to this alleged order.

For reasons unknown to me, the FBI appears to be attributing this directive to support from a single judge who is not on the Supreme Court. I will include the judge's identity within an email communication to your Office, as I do not feel it is appropriate to do so publicly.

I will observe that the Supreme Court knows this case well by now, and no one should feel empowered to undermine the highest Court's rulings by remanding critical aspects of this case to lesser judgement.

I do not believe that practice to be ethical, and I do not believe that the FBI should be permitted to treat life and death decisions for this highly honorable human rights advocates as a judicial "dating game," seeking the most harmful penalties possible in order to silence the agency's critics.

Please assist me in filing an appeal if appropriate, given whatever false accusations have been registered in this matter.

This is to confirm that all of my conduct, communications, activities, and television, cell phone and computer content and use have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form, reflecting the highest character and integrity in every way, shape and form.

Thank you for your assiduous advocacy regarding this matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline on March 24 and March 25, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:24:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following email sent to your Office on March 24 and March 25, 2026. Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Somewhere, sent at 8:37 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Confirmation of Visit with Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx and Pxxxxxxx Kxxxxxx, sent at 11:24 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 11:26 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: (EXTERNAL) Re: Revised Mooring Regulations, sent at 12:04 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Amazon Delivery, March 24, 2026, sent at 1:48 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Request for an Appeal, If Appropriate, Confidential, sent at 8:42 PM Pacific time.

Emails sent to your Office on March 25, 2026 include the following:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 24, 2026, Confidential, sent at 3:53 AM.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 9:49 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Amazon Deliveries, March 25, 2026, sent at 11:04 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Please Respond As Soon As Possible, Gxxxxxx, sent at 1:58 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Afternoon Amazon Deliveries, March 25, 2026, sent at 6:58 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Kxxxx Txxxxx Appointment, March 25, 2026, sent at 9:29 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Evening Amazon Delivery, March 25, 2026, sent at 10:48 PM Pacific time.

Emails sent to your Office on March 26, 2026 include the following:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: What Is at Stake for Us?, Confidential, sent at 1:27 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Keywords, What Is at Stake for Us?, Confidential, sent at 1:27 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for coming to the house today!, sent at 1:32 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 26, 2026, sent at 1:52 AM Pacific time.

Emails to the OIG Hotline on March 23, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:57:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see emails sent to your Office today, March 23, 2026:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for coming to the house today!, sent at 11:21 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you!, sent at 11:18 PM Pacific time.
Meeting Today; Inspection in Kxx's Presence, sent at 11:16 PM Pacific time.
Re: Revised Mxxxxxx Regulations, sent at 11:12 PM Pacific time.
Falmouth Hxxxxx Mxxxxx Regulations, sent at 11:11 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 10:36 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Documentation of Possible FBI Threats of Forgery, sent at 10:08 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: (redacted), sent at 7:58 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 22 and March 23, 2026, sent at 5:49 AM and 11:57 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The U.S. Postal Service as Necessary for Democracy, sent at 5:40 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Accountable, sent at 5:11 AM Pacific time.

The U.S. Postal Service as Necessary for Democracy

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:38:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, this is to document my intention to ensure that the U.S. Postal Service be appropriately funded and supported as foundational to the preservation of democracy within the United States, including its importance in states that allow mail-in ballots pertaining to state and federal elections. Because this provision is so important, I would appreciate outreach to ensure that it is written correctly. Accordingly, I would ask that communication be extended to me at the earliest possible time in order to appropriately establish this support for our national interest.

Thank you for facilitating all appropriate steps in this process.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Accountable

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:09:00 +0000

1. Has Trump advisor Stephen Miller allegedly advocated for the theft of your entire awards from the U.S. DOJ?

Answer: This is what the FBI alleges, yes.

2. On what basis, please?

Answer: On the basis of knowingly false accusations by the FBI.

3. Are these related to your family property on Cape Cod?

Answer: The FBI is alleged to have extended so many false accusations, it is unknown which lies are being emphasized in this latest attempt to steal from the American people through intended misappropriations.

4. Have these referenced misappropriations yet occurred?

Answer: Not yet.

5. Must Attorney General Pam Bondi approve them?

Answer: I'm sure that approval is required.

6. Is there any sense whatsoever that these individuals are accountable to history, to the public's evaluation, or to you yourself for this conduct?

Answer: I think you are asking whether there is fear on the part of anyone involved regarding the possibility of being exposed for unprecedented theft from the American people of funds totaling many trillions of dollars.

And the answer is yes, these people are conscious that they are suggesting flagrant violations of the law, of ethical standards, of judicial boundaries, and of reasoned judgement.

7. Can wrongful appropriations from your account be halted?

Answer: Most certainly. But the Congress and the Supreme Court need to demonstrate the determination to protect the future of human sovereignty by blocking this attempt to steal those funds.

8. Will they do so?

Answer: We need to call on them to do so, because the stakes are so high.

9. Can you articulate them once more, please?

Answer: If we allow the misappropriation of funds from my account, we are allowing the aggregation of wrongful wealth in the hands of those who will destroy all hope of human sovereignty in the future. The transfer of massive wealth to foreign adversaries of the United States, which will be the inevitable result of misappropriations, will prevent us from recovering our most fundamental human freedoms in the future.

It cannot be allowed.

10. What should happen with regard to those advising this conduct, in this case Stephen Miller, allegedly?

Answer: The greatest quality of leadership is wisdom. Where it is lacking, the risks for disastrous outcomes are greatly amplified.

I don't know Stephen Miller, but I am deeply concerned about the allegations that have been extended in this instance.

11. Won't these problems continue to occur unless the Supreme Court ruling concerning your case is upheld through appropriate communication with you regarding the investigative reports?

Answer: As long as there is defiance and disrespect for the Supreme Court by those responsible for upholding the ruling, the risks are untenable.

12. Who is most responsible for upholding the Supreme Court's ruling?

Answer: The United States Department of Justice, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, clearly.

13. Is AG Pam Bondi also responsible for protecting funds in your account from wrongful invasion?

Answer: Yes, she must hold the line defined by the Supreme Court with regard to protecting the funds.

14. Are you still awaiting honorable outreach regarding your case?

Answer: Yes, I am.

15. Are your children and daughter in law still being threatened with active harm by their agencies?

Answer: Most definitely.

16. Your older son has what appears to be an electrical burn on the back of his left hand. What caused this injury, please?

Answer: There appears to be the possibility that this was caused by a contact pad associated with electric shock.

17. Are you referencing intentional torture when you say "electric shock"?

Answer: Yes, I am.

18. To what does your son attribute this injury?

Answer: To scalding water at the kitchen sink in his apartment.

19. Is this explanation plausible?

Answer: No, his apartment building sets controls on water temperature that are quite low by comparison to the standard water temperature range. So, there is no possibility that he was scalded by hot water anywhere in the building.

20. Has your older son suffered electric shock torture in the past?

Answer: Yes, the FBI alleges that this crime has been committed against him previously.

21. By whom?

Answer: By agency affiliates at the directive of the FBI within his apartment building.

22. Isn't this conduct illegal?

Answer: For FBI contractors to be torturing American citizens within the continental United States? Yes, I believe that is illegal in every measure.

23. Do you believe that the FBI's ongoing involvement in human trafficking also constitutes torture?

Answer: Without question, it does.

24. So the human rights of your children are being egregiously violated while you are advocating for the long term human rights of all Americans?

Answer: Yes.

25. You must be profoundly displeased.

Answer: Mightily displeased, yes.

26. Please keep in close contact with us to report on the health and wellbeing of your family, your pets, and yourself.

Answer: Thank you for your concern. I most certainly will.

27. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline on March 21, 2026 and March 22, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Sun, 22 Mar 2026 03:24:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see my communications to your Office on March 21, 2026.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane Macwilliams' Wifi Access, March 21, 2026, sent at 8:24 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: GTM Texts, March 20, 2026, sent at 8:07 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: KPM Texts, March 20, 2026, sent at 8:02 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Amazon Delivery, March 21, 2026, sent at 7:57 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 3:58 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane Macwilliams' Wifi Access, March 20, 2026, sent at 8:24 AM (March 21, 2026)

On March 22, 2026, the following communications were sent to your Office:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane Macwilliams' Wifi Access, March 22 and March 23, 2026, sent at 5:48 AM and 5:49 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The U.S. Postal Service as Necessary for Democracy, sent at 5:40 AM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Battling False Information, sent at 3:21 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Kroll Re: Fwd: Legal Notice of Kroll Class Action Exclusion ... Los Angeles Times Communications..., sent at 3:19 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Who Is Txx Lxxxx and Why Is He Not Stepping Forward Honorably?, sent at 3:16 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Inspection in Kxx's Presence, sent at 2:21 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Mxxxxx Fxxxxxx' Acknowledgement, sent at 1:42 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Still Not a Radical, sent at 8:39 AM Pacific time.

Emails to the OIG Hotline on March 20, 2026

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Fri, 20 Mar 2026 21:30:00 +0000

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office today, March 20, 2026. Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day.

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 2:25 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fxxxxxxx' Dxx, March 20, 2026, sent at 2:22 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent Unscheduled Visit to 45 Vista Verde Way by Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx and Pxxxxxxx Kxxxxxxx, sent at 4:39 PM Pacific time.
ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: No Recent Political Donations, sent at 6:12 PM Pacific time.

Emails sent on March 21, 2026 include the following:

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane Macwilliams' Wifi Access on March 20, 2026, sent at 8:24 AM Pacific time.

Addressal of the FBI's "Hawaii Hilton" and Its Corollaries in the Continental United States

lanevonherzen@gmail.com (Lane von Herzen) — Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:03:00 +0000

1. The FBI has apparently been involved in the construction of an underground facility in Hawaii, mostly unused as of this time, intended to incarcerate women in the future, with a view toward sexual exploitation. Is this your understanding of the situation?

Answer: Yes, it is. This is a facility that incorporates advanced construction, including tsunami seals, reportedly. It has been carefully planned and built with the long term in mind.

2. What sort of women would be incarcerated there?

Answer: Women attractive to local and federal law enforcement and security personnel. This is truly the qualifier. The planning of this facility has no relationship to some spate of incipient crimes about to be committed by gangs of attractive and lawless women in Hawaii.

To the contrary, this detention center is intended to facilitate wrongful imprisonment and exploitation of perfectly honorable people.

3. How large is the facility?

Answer: Large enough to accommodate well over one hundred detainees, reportedly.

4. And were these women to be returned to their lives after their detention and presumed harm?

Answer: Decidedly not. No.

5. What was the plan regarding the fate of these intended prisoners?

Answer: Those women would not have survived their detention.

6. Would their family members have known what had become of them? Would anyone have known that they had been incarcerated?

Answer: No, there would have been no communication allowed with family members or legal representation on the basis of a "national security risk." In other words, they all would have been accused of espionage or terrorism, thus allowing the FBI to deprive them of their civil rights in their entirety.

7. Would these women have been foreign nationals exclusively?

Answer: No. While foreign nationals would have been at increased risk, Americans would have been snatched from their daily lives only to find themselves trapped in this location as well.

8. You have said that there are other facilities in the United States that mirror the one in Hawaii. Do you have any idea where they might be located?

Answer: There is reportedly one in Southern California, one in Texas, and one in Florida. I cannot comment on other locations, given that these have not been disclosed to me.

9. What is it about these facilities that discloses their purpose? How can we tell that they were intended for women in particular, and how can we tell that the planning involved sexual exploitation of detainees?

Answer: There are reportedly hotel-like bedrooms in addition to traditional cells. There are reportedly bidets. The structures are generally underground, which is to say concealed from public view, awareness and monitoring. So, the intent is fairly obvious in the architecture alone.

10. How were the women to be incarcerated? Is this known to you?

Answer: It's clear that foreign nationals could simply be picked up at any time by plain clothes law enforcement.

American women could be the victims of false allegations of human trafficking, incriminating cell phone content, suspicious purse or beach bag contents, falsified communications, the placement of unknown items in their hotel rooms by corrupt law enforcement, or simply false witness statements.

In Communist and Fascist nations, this is known as denunciation. And this dynamic has been well-described by Solzhenitsyn and others.

11. Who has overseen the construction of these facilities?

Answer: The FBI has directly managed this planning and construction over time on the basis of "national security preparedness."

12. Are members of the U.S. Congress aware of this construction?

Answer: They are now. Prior to this time, only a handful of Congressmen have been informed.

13. What about the U.S. Department of Justice?

Answer: The U.S. DOJ as a whole has not had access to this information, no.

14. What about the Executive Branch?

Answer: This is a question for the President and his staff, certainly.

15. What are your thoughts about this circumstance, please?

Answer: First, I will observe that we have seen these patterns before in other places around the world. Abductions of women and girls have been documented in Ukraine (https://khpg.org/en/1608814818), Nigeria, Haiti, Afghanistan, and other areas, with minority women at increased risk, certainly. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewelinaochab/2022/05/16/abducted-and-enslaved-minority-women-and-girls-let-down-by-governments-globally/

Alongside this, there have been reports of violence against women incarcerated within the United States, so we know this has been a systemic problem for our nation once a woman's formal freedom is taken from her.

At this time, we are seeing increasing detentions through federal law enforcement authorities.

So, the existence of facilities intended for sexual exploitation of women signals long term planning by the FBI with regard to increasing predation toward women and girls within the United States over time.

16. What are the necessary steps at this juncture?

Answer: Congress should subpoena information regarding how many of these facilities exist and where they are located. The sites should be directly assessed and evaluated. All documentation regarding the planning and construction of these centers should be aggregated.

The public should be made aware of the FBI's conduct regarding this matter, along with that of any other agencies and affiliates who played a central role in the dedication of taxpayer funds toward the intended victimization of women and girls.

The sites, obviously, should be decommissioned, and there needs to be a full accounting of this matter before the American electorate.

17. What other guidance can you provide regarding this astonishing development?

Answer: I will express that I am grateful this issue came to my attention and that I was able to raise the alarm promptly.

Our nation is under significant pressure due to environmental and geopolitical concerns at this time, and realistically, those stressors are likely to worsen.

Despite this, and perhaps even because of it, we must ensure that women and girls are not exploited, diminished, defamed, and rendered vulnerable to abduction, abuse, wrongful arrest, and isolation by the FBI and its affiliates.

Our nation's capacity to lead through the challenges that are imminent is dependent partly on our insistence that women and girls not be rendered victims of federal agencies that are increasingly seeking to exert power and control in a totalitarian manner.

Rather, women, alongside those men who defend their human rights, are necessary in ensuring that our defense of the sovereignty of the United States will succeed.

If we preferentially sacrifice women's human rights to the exigencies of the moment, we are also sacrificing children's human rights in the process. And the intended demeaning and diminishment of women and children as an institutional prerogative is decidedly not in the national interest.

It is only in adequately respecting and honoring our mothers, our sisters, our daughters and our wives -- alongside the men who know that women's human rights are not secondary -- that the United States can assert its rightful claim to the sovereignty of the American people and the nation as a whole.

The mission and objectives of the FBI simply do not include torture, sexual violence, and systemic predation toward the vulnerable.

Our worthy nation must reject those aggressions as inimical to our sovereign future.

I now ask for the help of the U.S. Congress in rigorously addressing the risks the FBI has wrongfully created for our women and girls, and correspondingly, our nation as a whole.

18. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams