A snippet from their about page:

Welcome to Grimm Grammar, an irreverent revival and shameless exploitation of 19th-century Grimm Fairy Tales for honorable pedagogical purposes.  Fortunately for you, Dear Reader, thirty-six characters from these fairy tales have returned to 21st century Germany (their precise location cannot be revealed for privacy reasons) to model all things grammatical … anything the most eager language learner may wish to know about the German language.

…

This online grammar reference was created for lower-division language courses at the University of Texas, but any beginning or intermediate learner of German may use it completely free of charge, as long as he or she is willing to take a trip to the imaginary world of Grimm Grammar … the characters of which are grumpy and gorgeous, scary and smarmy, witty and wicked!

If you’re getting started in German, check it out; you could probably skip the introductory German grammar book, and instead just wait until you need a copy Hammer’s.

I’ve also done a tiny bit of Russian recently, working a bit on lesson 54 of Russian without Toil, as well as on some of the exercises in chapter 12 of the New Penguin Russian Course. Nothing overly exciting about either, however. I want to sit down for a few hours and plow through a bit of my Russian history book soon.

And, finally, I’ve been trying to decide on how I want to rearrange my language learning schedule. While I’m making progress, certainly, I’m not entirely happy with my haphazard way of hopping from one language to another. Some languages tend to get lost in the mess, and as of late, French has been suffering quite a lot – not to mention poor Spanish, which seems to have wholly vanished from my studies. I’m not frustrated enough to slash any more from my current list, but I’m going to have to put my current list into some sort of overall structure to please myself. I’m just not entirely sure how I’m going to do that. I know some people insist on sticking to one or two languages until they’re mastered them (whatever that means), but I don’t see myself doing that. I’ve also read of some people spending a few months on a couple of languages, then switching to other languages for a few months, etc. Again, I’m not sure I could do this.

Hrm. I’ll figure something out.

Later in the evening, I took my copy of Russisch ohne Mühe to bed with me, and reviewed lesson 24. I’m not sure why, but my bookmark was on that lesson, so it seemed as good a lesson as any to review.

For German, I’ve been adding vocabulary to Anki; nothing new there. I did another copying session with French with Ease, and today, I did two Assimil lessons, one for Dutch and one for Russian.

For Dutch, it was lesson 24; for Russian, it was lesson 54 of the 1951 Russian without Toil. Not a whole lot to note about either, I’m afraid, except for one thing: in the Russian lesson, the English translation refers to telephonic robots. I have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about. All I can think of is something like today’s autodialers which call people for advertising purposes. At any rate, telephonic robots sounds hilarious.

As a review (and for something to do while doing less interesting things, like dishes and laundry), I listened to lessons 8-28 of Russisch ohne Mühe. After listening to it, I’m reminded again of the fact that while I progress more slowly due to the base language being German, I still prefer Russisch ohne Mühe (1971) over Russian without Toil (1951). It seems tighter, and just generally to be of better quality. I suppose that’s logical enough, what with it being the second “try” at a Russian course for Assimil.

Dutch

While I didn’t do a whole lot of it, I finally got around to copying out some Dutch by hand for some much needed spelling practice. I copied lessons one and two of Dutch with Ease. I’ve already noted a few things I had not noticed previously, despite reading the lessons repeatedly. For example, it’s maakt, not makt (makes, does), and zes, not ses (six). I also listened to around 15 minutes of Dutch radio online, but didn’t really understand a great deal of it. I know that at one point they were talking about Michael Jackson, however…

German

I added around 40 cards to Anki, mostly from Langenscheidt’s Basic German Vocabulary text. Still plugging vocabulary holes, it seems. A few of them were from a paragraph from the Wikipedia article Chinesisch-Schwedische Expedition; I’m not quite sure what in this article caught my eye, but I found the paragraph stuffed in a Google Documents file with a number of translations already added in at the bottom. The one that I found most interesting was the phrase “vor Ort,” which means “on site, in the field.”

I also listened to an episode of ZeitZeichen. It was about the death of the Aztec leader Moctezuma II (later to be called Montezuma by the Spaniards).

Danish

Did I say Danish? Um, yes, yes I did. You see, I was looking on Abebooks for one thing, and I came across another thing, that thing being an old copy of Teach Yourself Danish. And it was only a dollar! So of course, I had to buy it, just in case. But the book arrived today, and I couldn’t help myself, and so I read the preface and general introduction. Having done nothing more, my only comment is that the book reports that the language shares a huge number of loan words from German, as well as a large number of words sharing the same root as similar English words. Thus, anyone with a knowledge of English and German already has a leg up in learning Danish. Well, isn’t that convenient.

After that, I copied out the first four or five sentences from Stranitsy Istorii by Syrov. Thanks to Iversen providing the full publication details at the HTLAL forums, I was able to find the book. It’s a history book designed for learners of Russian with all of the accents marked. Anyway, after copying each sentence, I looked up all of the words and figured out the declensions of things. It was certainly slow going, but it was nice to read the whole paragraph and feel that I actually got most of it (after a fair amount of work). There was one construction I was somewhat baffled by, though:

Советскую страну населяет более сотни различных народов.

As best as I can make out, this comes out something like:

(The) Soviet country [accusative] inhabit more hundreds of various / different peoples.

I get the gist of it, but the usage of более has me a bit puzzled. My dictionary shows it as meaning “more.” However, “more than” seems to be более чем, and so the lonely более evades me somewhat.

Google Translate spits this out for the above sentence:

This morning, I started out with the New Penguin Russian Course. I worked through some exercises in chapter 12 dealing with verb aspect, and did a short word list with the verbs presented.

In the afternoon, I finished copying lesson 52 of Russian without Toil. I started a list of the new words in the lesson that I need to learn; I still like pulling the words out into a list, so I can look them up and verify they mean exactly what the translation says they do. I also want to know both the imperfective / perfective forms of verbs, and Assimil doesn’t always provide that for all of the verbs.

Finally, I read a few pages from Terence Wade’s Comprehensive Russian Grammar about verb conjugation.

I copied out / translated lesson 20 of New French with Ease, and then made some notes from lesson 21 about things I had forgotten. One such thing was the fact that if the definite article is added before a day of the week, it means that what’s happening happens on that day of the week repeatedly. An example might help explain that a wee bit better:

Il vient samedi – He’s coming (on) Saturday.
Il vient le samedi – He comes (on) Saturdays [i.e., every Saturday].

I also listened to the first 10 or so lessons of Using French as review.

German

I listened to some podcasts and read a few articles at Deutsche Welle; nothing earth shaking, I’m afraid.

Russian

Read lessons 49, 50 and 51 as review in Russian without Toil.

I listened to around an hour of Manfred Mai’s Deutsche Geschichte in audiobook format. I found it pretty easy to follow along; I’m not sure if he’s using a fairly simple vocabulary, or if it’s because of my background in history.

I also listened to a few podcasts from Deutsche Welle, but don’t remember which ones.

And, as usual, I did my Anki reviews (around 50 cards).