<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937</id><updated>2024-09-06T13:14:30.787-07:00</updated><category term="Condonation of delay"/><category term="Dishonour of cheques"/><title type='text'>LATEST JUDGEMENTS BY COURTS OF LAW IN INDIA</title><subtitle type='html'>This Blog gives you the Citation and just the headnotes of latest judgments law wise. Authentication be verified by the reader and the bloggers are not liable for the comments and headnotes.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default?redirect=false'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false'/><author><name>Siddharth Murarka</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17691817844512942710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Ei8ZmYidkYE/SzSSSUDJx4I/AAAAAAAAAAs/1jITISp6N_U/S220/Picture+11.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>63</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-5173546216425717534</id><published>2010-05-16T06:43:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:43:32.587-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Wakf Act — Review of own order.</title><content type='html'>Wakf Act, 1995 — Review of own order — Order obtained by playing fraud — Even in the absence of any express provision the CEO is empowered to review / recall his own order. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) (AUR) 3&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/5173546216425717534/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/wakf-act-review-of-own-order.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/5173546216425717534'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/5173546216425717534'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/wakf-act-review-of-own-order.html' title='Wakf Act — Review of own order.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-8548456620261870998</id><published>2010-05-16T06:42:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:43:05.295-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Succession _ Widow.</title><content type='html'>Succession — Successor-in-interest is not a successor-in-title — Successor-in-title succeeds upon succession either testamentary or intestate — Widow of the original owner — Her claim upon succession is not a claim as a successor-in-interest but a successor-in-title. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 69&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/8548456620261870998/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/succession-widow.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/8548456620261870998'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/8548456620261870998'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/succession-widow.html' title='Succession _ Widow.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-6179950060793322743</id><published>2010-05-16T06:42:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:42:34.974-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Succession — Nomination of shares.</title><content type='html'>Succession — Nomination of shares — Nominee has the right to the shares after the death of original shareholder and not the heirs of deceased — Specific statutory provision make the nominee entitled to all the rights in the shares excluding all other persons. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) 12&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/6179950060793322743/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/succession-nomination-of-shares.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6179950060793322743'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6179950060793322743'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/succession-nomination-of-shares.html' title='Succession — Nomination of shares.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-8270660587953566545</id><published>2010-05-16T06:41:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:42:12.003-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sales tax — Levy of — Steam.</title><content type='html'>Sales tax — Levy of — Steam cannot be classified under the Notification Entry No.233 as the same is not chemical. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) 34&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/8270660587953566545/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/sales-tax-levy-of-steam.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/8270660587953566545'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/8270660587953566545'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/sales-tax-levy-of-steam.html' title='Sales tax — Levy of — Steam.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-6649896674485037472</id><published>2010-05-16T06:41:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:41:50.739-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Quasi-judicial proceedings</title><content type='html'>Quasi-judicial proceedings — Guidelines or directions cannot encroach upon the discretion conferred by Rules upon any appellate authority and restrict its application of mind or attempt to cut the process of adjudication. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (NAG) 195&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/6649896674485037472/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/quasi-judicial-proceedings.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6649896674485037472'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6649896674485037472'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/quasi-judicial-proceedings.html' title='Quasi-judicial proceedings'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-1697375130262703443</id><published>2010-05-16T06:41:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:41:28.685-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Public premises</title><content type='html'>Public premises — Petition against order of Principal Judge under Public Premises Act — Jurisdiction of the Division Bench is not totally ousted. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 66&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/1697375130262703443/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-premises_16.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1697375130262703443'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1697375130262703443'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-premises_16.html' title='Public premises'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-2882128543085973131</id><published>2010-05-16T06:40:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:41:10.755-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Public servant disobeying law</title><content type='html'>Public servant disobeying law — Only be a natural person can be charged with an offence punishable u/s 166 coupled with a fact that he is a public servant — Offence u/s 166 cannot be against a particular office but it can only be against a person who holds an office. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) 8&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/2882128543085973131/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-servant-disobeying-law.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/2882128543085973131'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/2882128543085973131'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-servant-disobeying-law.html' title='Public servant disobeying law'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-7769962480785292576</id><published>2010-05-16T06:40:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:40:48.251-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Public premises</title><content type='html'>Public premises — District Judge when acting as Appellate Authority acts as a persona designata and hence no revision lies. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 66&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/7769962480785292576/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-premises.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/7769962480785292576'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/7769962480785292576'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-premises.html' title='Public premises'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-183656589515061761</id><published>2010-05-16T06:40:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:40:25.781-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Motor accident — Minor child — Compensation.</title><content type='html'>Motor accident — Minor child aged 11 years — Cannot be said that victims below the age of 15 years are to be excluded — &#39;Loss of future income&#39; as a head of compensation applies to all persons whether earning or not at the time. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 170&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/183656589515061761/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/motor-accident-minor-child-compensation.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/183656589515061761'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/183656589515061761'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/motor-accident-minor-child-compensation.html' title='Motor accident — Minor child — Compensation.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-1968158912790058505</id><published>2010-05-16T06:39:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:40:01.572-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Motor accident  — Compensation.</title><content type='html'>Motor accident — Findings of Tribunal — Where the claimant does not prefer any cross-objection against the finding recorded by the Tribunal that finding must be said to have assumed finality under Order 41 Rule 22 of CPC. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) (NAG) 7&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/1968158912790058505/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/motor-accident-compensation.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1968158912790058505'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1968158912790058505'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/motor-accident-compensation.html' title='Motor accident  — Compensation.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-6906596640321821318</id><published>2010-05-16T06:39:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:39:33.929-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Medical negligence.</title><content type='html'>Medical negligence — Offence punishable u/s 315 of IPC — Intention is one of the major ingredient. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (AUR) 95&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/6906596640321821318/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/medical-negligence.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6906596640321821318'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6906596640321821318'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/medical-negligence.html' title='Medical negligence.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-7224030296670921984</id><published>2010-05-16T06:38:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:39:09.033-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Maintenance — Second wife/ mistress.</title><content type='html'>Maintenance — Second wife/ mistress — Applicant have recourse to the provisions of Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) (NAG) 13&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/7224030296670921984/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/maintenance-second-wife-mistress.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/7224030296670921984'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/7224030296670921984'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/maintenance-second-wife-mistress.html' title='Maintenance — Second wife/ mistress.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-4067405492966562074</id><published>2010-05-16T06:38:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:38:38.980-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Interest — Delay in payment of decretal amount.</title><content type='html'>Interest — Delay in payment of decretal amount — An action only for interest is not unusual — Delay in payment of the decretal amount furnishes an independent cause of action for payment of interest on account of such delay — Claim maintainable u/s 3(1)(a), 3(1)(b) and u/s 4 of the Interest Act — Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 can also grant interest in such a a case. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 87&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/4067405492966562074/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/interest-delay-in-payment-of-decretal.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/4067405492966562074'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/4067405492966562074'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/interest-delay-in-payment-of-decretal.html' title='Interest — Delay in payment of decretal amount.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-1593026375119582385</id><published>2010-05-16T06:37:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:38:14.632-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Income tax — Re-opening of assessment.</title><content type='html'>Income tax — Re-opening of assessment — Reasons recorded cannot be allowed to grow with age and ingenuity by devising new grounds in replies and affidavits — Reasons which are recorded cannot be supplemented by affidavits. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 68&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/1593026375119582385/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/income-tax-re-opening-of-assessment.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1593026375119582385'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1593026375119582385'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/income-tax-re-opening-of-assessment.html' title='Income tax — Re-opening of assessment.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-928831958534646331</id><published>2010-05-16T06:37:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:37:45.306-07:00</updated><title type='text'>ESI Act — Applicability of.</title><content type='html'>ESI Act — Applicability of — Gas lighter with a flame was being used for melting and soldering the gold and other ornaments — Use of LGP satisfies the definition of power — Manufacturing process was going on with aid of power. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) (GOA) 30&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/928831958534646331/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/esi-act-applicability-of.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/928831958534646331'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/928831958534646331'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/esi-act-applicability-of.html' title='ESI Act — Applicability of.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-8039220436313238801</id><published>2010-05-16T06:37:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:37:20.254-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Divorce — Mental cruelty — Filing of false criminal case.</title><content type='html'>Divorce — Mental cruelty — Filing of false criminal case — Solitary incidence would itself constitute mental cruelty — It is illogical that more than one complaint are necessary to be filed to constitute mental cruelty. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) 29&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/8039220436313238801/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/divorce-mental-cruelty-filing-of-false.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/8039220436313238801'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/8039220436313238801'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/divorce-mental-cruelty-filing-of-false.html' title='Divorce — Mental cruelty — Filing of false criminal case.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-7101286018064849001</id><published>2010-05-16T06:36:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:36:55.137-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Corruption</title><content type='html'>Corruption case — Accepting felicitation is no corruption. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) 16&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/7101286018064849001/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/corruption.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/7101286018064849001'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/7101286018064849001'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/corruption.html' title='Corruption'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-153966392952040574</id><published>2010-05-16T06:36:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:36:31.016-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Grant of bail _ Confession of co-accused.</title><content type='html'>Bail — Grant of — Offence under POTA — Accomplice evidence is of a tainted character and as such is a weak evidence — Confession of co-accused cannot be read against the appellant while considering his plea for bail. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (5) LJSOFT 67&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/153966392952040574/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/grant-of-bail-confession-of-co-accused.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/153966392952040574'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/153966392952040574'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/grant-of-bail-confession-of-co-accused.html' title='Grant of bail _ Confession of co-accused.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-5782952705008512428</id><published>2010-05-16T06:35:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:35:51.701-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Porn websites _ Ban on.</title><content type='html'>Porn websites _ Person aggrieved by web content could file complaint u/s 67 and 67A of Information Technology Act _ Court turned down a public interest litigation seeking a blanket ban on websites with sexual content on the internet. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT (URC) 18&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/5782952705008512428/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/porn-websites-ban-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/5782952705008512428'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/5782952705008512428'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/porn-websites-ban-on.html' title='Porn websites _ Ban on.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-6077123682827735384</id><published>2010-05-16T06:35:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:35:21.822-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Secondary evidence</title><content type='html'>Secondary evidence _ Xerox copies prepared from xerox copies not covered under the ambit of secondary evidence as per the provisions of section 63(2) of Evidence Act. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT (URC) 9&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/6077123682827735384/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/secondary-evidence.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6077123682827735384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6077123682827735384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/secondary-evidence.html' title='Secondary evidence'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-2619450994825732011</id><published>2010-05-16T06:34:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:34:58.556-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Right of fair trial</title><content type='html'>Right of fair trial _ Accused should know allegations made against him and have a copy of the F.I.R. at the earliest stage even before his arrest _ Accused entitled to a certified copy of the F.I.R. from the officer in charge of the police station _ Applicant entitled to interim protection pending receipt of a copy of the F.I.R. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT (URC) 17&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/2619450994825732011/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/right-of-fair-trial.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/2619450994825732011'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/2619450994825732011'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/right-of-fair-trial.html' title='Right of fair trial'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-6849767630205967814</id><published>2010-05-16T06:33:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:34:16.889-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Public Trust _ Secretary _ Withdrawal of powers.</title><content type='html'>Public Trust _ Post of secretary _ There is no concept such as withdrawal of power and the person holding such post himself has to be removed. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT 164&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/6849767630205967814/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-trust-secretary-withdrawal-of.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6849767630205967814'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/6849767630205967814'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/public-trust-secretary-withdrawal-of.html' title='Public Trust _ Secretary _ Withdrawal of powers.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-1972081721066359906</id><published>2010-05-16T06:33:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:33:40.334-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Municipal Corporation _ Service of notice.</title><content type='html'>Municipal Corporation _ Pre suit statutory notice as required u/s 384 not necessary before the institution of the suit against an apprehended injury. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT 70&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/1972081721066359906/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/municipal-corporation-service-of-notice.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1972081721066359906'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1972081721066359906'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/municipal-corporation-service-of-notice.html' title='Municipal Corporation _ Service of notice.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-620140563843879583</id><published>2010-05-16T06:32:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:33:09.728-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Motor accident _ Contributory negligence.</title><content type='html'>Motor accident _ Merely because two vehicles are involved it could not be inferred that it is a case of contributory negligence _ It has to be specifically pleaded and proved on the basis of preponderance of probabilities. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT 123&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/620140563843879583/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/motor-accident-contributory-negligence.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/620140563843879583'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/620140563843879583'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/motor-accident-contributory-negligence.html' title='Motor accident _ Contributory negligence.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5102231445214713937.post-1245898153677045779</id><published>2010-05-16T06:32:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-16T06:32:38.712-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mahomedan Law _ Re-marriage after talak.</title><content type='html'>Mahomedan Law _ Re-marriage after talak _ Not necessary that the Halala formality must be complied with by the wife in case of every irrevocable Talak irrespective of its mode _ Only in case of a triple Talak, re-marriage with the same husband is legal and valid if Halala is observed _ In case of a talak in the Ahsan mode Halala is not mandatory. &lt;strong&gt;See 2010 (4) LJSOFT (URC) 6&lt;/strong&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/feeds/1245898153677045779/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/mahomedan-law-re-marriage-after-talak.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1245898153677045779'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5102231445214713937/posts/default/1245898153677045779'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://latestcaselaws.blogspot.com/2010/05/mahomedan-law-re-marriage-after-talak.html' title='Mahomedan Law _ Re-marriage after talak.'/><author><name>Sanjeev Kuchhal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10551350186414973435</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='27' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-NWBDXL3to8fV5LT4fVPIuvunbifDD65Fm7NHRYhLrcWApSqSiUaQKUBtxEgHtFgPKQqjMamQCHN3nIhZ0k6UYs71T6f2N-KhADm71l337VF_2EQ23Bqehl1rv2arA/s220/ljlogo2.GIF'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>