<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in</title>
	
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LawMatters" /><feedburner:info uri="lawmatters" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Actors and the Proposed Copyright Amendment</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/cqE-HXjlpNY/actors-and-the-proposed-copyright-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/actors-and-the-proposed-copyright-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1815</guid>
		<description>The Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, proposes to amend the Copyright Act so as to clarify the definition of “performers” and their rights. The definition of a “performer” in Section 2(qq) is an inclusive definition which states that a performer “includes an actor, singer, musician, dancer, acrobat, juggler, conjurer, snake charmer, a person delivering a lecture [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=cqE-HXjlpNY:-Qf2feXq4Sg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/cqE-HXjlpNY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/actors-and-the-proposed-copyright-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/actors-and-the-proposed-copyright-amendment</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Societies and the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/dtPL-xEJSWs/copyright-societies-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/copyright-societies-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1786</guid>
		<description>The Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, aims to completely restructure the working of and the eligibility criteria for membership in copyright societies by various amendments to Chapter VII of the Copyright Act, 1957, which would make it possible for only authors of works to become members of copyright societies and to manage them. This is intended [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=dtPL-xEJSWs:JzxJ9UEkA5E:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/dtPL-xEJSWs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/copyright-societies-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/copyright-societies-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Attribution of Licences under the Proposed Copyright Amendment</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/Tmw_eaoVk00/attribution-of-licences-under-the-proposed-copyright-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/attribution-of-licences-under-the-proposed-copyright-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1796</guid>
		<description>(This post has been revised on Spetember 3, 2010, based on comments from Pranesh Prakash.) It has been proposed to amend Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957, so as to delete the word “signed” from it. If amended in this fashion, the primary part of the Section would state: “The owner of the copyright in [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Tmw_eaoVk00:bLMgEWC8elo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/Tmw_eaoVk00" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/attribution-of-licences-under-the-proposed-copyright-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/attribution-of-licences-under-the-proposed-copyright-amendment</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi High Court takes up the “No Cashless Facility” Health Insurance Issue</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/hpsRo1MStdk/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1773</guid>
		<description>One might conclude that if one bought a health insurance policy, and paid a higher premium in order to avail of the &amp;#8220;cashless facility&amp;#8221;, the said &amp;#8220;cashless facility&amp;#8221; would actually be made available to one. Such a conclusion, however, apparently proved to be erroneous in a number of cases, including one involving a cancer patient. [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=hpsRo1MStdk:vb6HOrMCpgI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/hpsRo1MStdk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>OSP / ISP Liability and the Copyright (Amendment) Bill</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/Vc1L_7ues1w/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1757</guid>
		<description>(This post is a rough draft; comments would be appreciated. &amp;#8212; Nandita Saikia saikianandita@gmail.com) The Copyright Amendment Bill attempts to create a safe harbour for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and Online Service Providers (OSPs) in Indian copyright law through amendments to Sections 52(1)(b) and 52(1)(c) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (which would effectively be [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=Vc1L_7ues1w:Qd8_OCL0O24:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/Vc1L_7ues1w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinoffs and Sequels</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/sdvtkt2GJf4/spinoffs-and-sequels</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/spinoffs-and-sequels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage and Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1754</guid>
		<description>It looks like Michael Douglas and his ex-wife Diandre are set to debate the difference between these two forms of derivative works &amp;#8212; sequels and spinoffs &amp;#8212; in Court. Under the terms of their divorce, Diandre is entitled to fifty per cent of income from spinoffs of movies in which Michael Douglas acted before their [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=sdvtkt2GJf4:p-LNpsn0Oa0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/sdvtkt2GJf4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/spinoffs-and-sequels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/spinoffs-and-sequels</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Privilege and Property. Essays on the History of Copyright.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawMatters/~3/oU1w8JNW3gM/privilege-and-property-essays-on-the-history-of-copyright</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/privilege-and-property-essays-on-the-history-of-copyright#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 04:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1765</guid>
		<description>&amp;#8220;What can and can’t be copied is a matter of law, but also of aesthetics, culture, and economics.&amp;#8221; According to its publisher, OpenBook Publishers, this book edited by Martin Kretschmer, with Lionel Bently and Ronan Deazley will trace the history of copyright law, and its emergence from a &amp;#8220;a wide range of norms and practices&amp;#8221; [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:KwTdNBX3Jqk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?a=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMatters?i=oU1w8JNW3gM:Rp_MaGL2O_s:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMatters/~4/oU1w8JNW3gM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/privilege-and-property-essays-on-the-history-of-copyright/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://lawmatters.in/content/privilege-and-property-essays-on-the-history-of-copyright</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
