<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Law of the Land</title>
	
	<link>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>land use law and zoning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain="lawoftheland.wordpress.com" port="80" path="/?rsscloud=notify" registerProcedure="" protocol="http-post" />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="LAW OF THE LAND" />
	
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LawOfTheLand" /><feedburner:info uri="lawoftheland" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub" /><geo:lat>42.654978</geo:lat><geo:long>-73.800539</geo:long><feedburner:emailServiceId>LawOfTheLand</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>NY Appellate Court Holds Challenge to Construction of Garage Pursuant to Use Variance Moot Without Attempts for Injunctive Relief</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/l6FQXFX4ZOw/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-holds-challenge-to-construction-of-garage-pursuant-to-use-variance-moot-without-attempts-for-injunctive-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw - New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunctive Relief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6452</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The petitioners and respondents own adjoining parcels of property in a residentially zoned district.  The property is located in the Town of Amsterdam, Montgomery County.  The respondents  operate a...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=l6FQXFX4ZOw:1FmDwo3Pfso:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=l6FQXFX4ZOw:1FmDwo3Pfso:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/l6FQXFX4ZOw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-holds-challenge-to-construction-of-garage-pursuant-to-use-variance-moot-without-attempts-for-injunctive-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-holds-challenge-to-construction-of-garage-pursuant-to-use-variance-moot-without-attempts-for-injunctive-relief/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Appellate Court Deems Zoning Board Decision to Deny Special Exception Permit Arbitrary and Capricious</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/5b4_4pPw8LM/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-deems-zoning-board-decision-to-deny-special-exception-permit-arbitrary-and-capricious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw - New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Use/Exception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6450</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Kabro Associates, LLC applied for a special exception permit with the Town of Islip Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) to extend its off-street parking lot and extend its floor space into its rear lot...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=5b4_4pPw8LM:HNHBVPF1RFQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=5b4_4pPw8LM:HNHBVPF1RFQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/5b4_4pPw8LM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-deems-zoning-board-decision-to-deny-special-exception-permit-arbitrary-and-capricious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-deems-zoning-board-decision-to-deny-special-exception-permit-arbitrary-and-capricious/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Appellate Court Dismisses Stipulation of Settlement Where it Was Ambiguous for Failure to Indicate Applicable Zoning Ordinances</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/IvSX81NDjPY/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-dismisses-stipulation-of-settlement-where-it-was-ambiguous-for-failure-to-indicate-applicable-zoning-ordinances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw - New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoning - Interpretation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6458</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A New York appellate court explained that stipulations of settlement are not enforceable unless “definite and complete.”  Since the stipulation in this case was ambiguous as to whether the campground...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=IvSX81NDjPY:P0MJXHREfjs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=IvSX81NDjPY:P0MJXHREfjs:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/IvSX81NDjPY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-dismisses-stipulation-of-settlement-where-it-was-ambiguous-for-failure-to-indicate-applicable-zoning-ordinances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ny-appellate-court-dismisses-stipulation-of-settlement-where-it-was-ambiguous-for-failure-to-indicate-applicable-zoning-ordinances/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HI Appeals Court Holds Land Use Commission Only has Jurisdiction over State Law Issues and Cannot Issue a Declaratory Ruling after County has Already Issues a Concrete Ruling</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/LaJNUx3BHAw/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/hi-appeals-court-holds-land-use-commission-only-has-jurisdiction-over-state-law-issues-and-cannot-issue-a-declaratory-ruling-after-county-has-already-issues-a-concrete-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agricultural Uses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6444</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Kuleana Ku’ikahi LLC filed a petition requesting the Land Use Commission (LUC) issue a declaratory ruling determining that neighboring land was being used in violation of state and county laws....<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=LaJNUx3BHAw:cuxozXYiNws:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=LaJNUx3BHAw:cuxozXYiNws:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/LaJNUx3BHAw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/hi-appeals-court-holds-land-use-commission-only-has-jurisdiction-over-state-law-issues-and-cannot-issue-a-declaratory-ruling-after-county-has-already-issues-a-concrete-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/hi-appeals-court-holds-land-use-commission-only-has-jurisdiction-over-state-law-issues-and-cannot-issue-a-declaratory-ruling-after-county-has-already-issues-a-concrete-ruling/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Appellate Court Finds Zoning Board’s Decision on Nonconforming Use Variance to be Without a Rational Basis</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/OuRWCkSdk5I/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/ny-appellate-court-finds-zoning-boards-decision-on-nonconforming-use-variance-to-be-without-a-rational-basis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw - New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Conforming Uses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6455</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Petitioners owned property that was used as a multi-family dwelling.  The petitioners applied for a nonconforming use variance from the relevant zoning code, which was enacted in 1934. The Zoning...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=OuRWCkSdk5I:y6-kQ8KXSGg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=OuRWCkSdk5I:y6-kQ8KXSGg:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/OuRWCkSdk5I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/ny-appellate-court-finds-zoning-boards-decision-on-nonconforming-use-variance-to-be-without-a-rational-basis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/ny-appellate-court-finds-zoning-boards-decision-on-nonconforming-use-variance-to-be-without-a-rational-basis/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MD Appeals Court Holds County Residents Challenging Sizable Number of Land Actions as Against County Charter Lack Standing as Voters</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/MlWBDHafiXg/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/md-appeals-court-holds-county-residents-challenging-sizable-number-of-land-actions-as-against-county-charter-lack-standing-as-voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Necessary Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6447</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A group of Howard County residents brought suit against the county challenging over 100 land use actions taken by the County over the last two decades. They sought declaratory judgment that the acts,...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=MlWBDHafiXg:m84Bv7ey6AM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=MlWBDHafiXg:m84Bv7ey6AM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/MlWBDHafiXg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/md-appeals-court-holds-county-residents-challenging-sizable-number-of-land-actions-as-against-county-charter-lack-standing-as-voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/md-appeals-court-holds-county-residents-challenging-sizable-number-of-land-actions-as-against-county-charter-lack-standing-as-voters/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>OR Supreme Court Holds that in Determining Whether a Property Owner has a Vested Right to Complete Development of a Subdivision Must Include Consideration of the Extent and General Cost of the Project to be Vested</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/f7ET8g0Lq0w/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/or-supreme-court-holds-that-in-determining-whether-a-property-owner-has-a-vested-right-to-complete-development-of-a-subdivision-must-include-consideration-of-the-extent-and-general-cost-of-the-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vested Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6442</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A Property owner claimed that he had a vested right to complete development of a 59 lot subdivision. The Department of Land Conservation and development (DLCD) sought review of the county planning...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=f7ET8g0Lq0w:21EVClr9pKQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=f7ET8g0Lq0w:21EVClr9pKQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/f7ET8g0Lq0w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/or-supreme-court-holds-that-in-determining-whether-a-property-owner-has-a-vested-right-to-complete-development-of-a-subdivision-must-include-consideration-of-the-extent-and-general-cost-of-the-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/or-supreme-court-holds-that-in-determining-whether-a-property-owner-has-a-vested-right-to-complete-development-of-a-subdivision-must-include-consideration-of-the-extent-and-general-cost-of-the-project/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>TX Supreme Court Holds Failure to Pursue Appeal of Administrative Nuisance Finding Bars Takings Claim</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/wITA8YLQBZk/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/tx-supreme-court-holds-failure-to-pursue-appeal-of-administrative-nuisance-finding-bars-takings-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6439</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Plaintiff owned twenty buildings. The city found that the property was a nuisance and notified him that it intended to demolish 15 of the buildings that were substandard. Plaintiff sued to enjoin the...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=wITA8YLQBZk:W6cuap8axxg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=wITA8YLQBZk:W6cuap8axxg:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/wITA8YLQBZk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/tx-supreme-court-holds-failure-to-pursue-appeal-of-administrative-nuisance-finding-bars-takings-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/tx-supreme-court-holds-failure-to-pursue-appeal-of-administrative-nuisance-finding-bars-takings-claim/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MD Court of Appeals Holds that When Development Regulations Incorporate Master Plan Compliance, The Master Plan itself Becomes a Regulatory Device</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/L1Jovi3C81M/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/22/md-court-of-appeals-holds-that-when-development-regulations-incorporate-master-plan-compliance-the-master-plan-itself-becomes-a-regulatory-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subdivision Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6437</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In 1991, the owner of property and the County government failed to resolve whether certain restrictions could be placed on parcels surrounding a certain historic mansion. In considering the Master...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=L1Jovi3C81M:4Spq_ngzMKw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=L1Jovi3C81M:4Spq_ngzMKw:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/L1Jovi3C81M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/22/md-court-of-appeals-holds-that-when-development-regulations-incorporate-master-plan-compliance-the-master-plan-itself-becomes-a-regulatory-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/22/md-court-of-appeals-holds-that-when-development-regulations-incorporate-master-plan-compliance-the-master-plan-itself-becomes-a-regulatory-device/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit Court of Appeals Dismisses Constitutional Claims Over Regulation of Advertisements on Benches</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~3/2Ls2lFfyByk/</link>
		<comments>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/6th-circuit-court-of-appeals-dismisses-constitutional-claims-over-regulation-of-advertisements-on-benches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Salkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Conforming Uses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/?p=6435</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Plaintiff company is in the business of putting benches with advertisements on them on public and private property. In 1993, the City, enforcing its ordinances, confiscated more than 200 benches and...<br/>
<br/>
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=2Ls2lFfyByk:83CXPy9RLis:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?a=2Ls2lFfyByk:83CXPy9RLis:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawOfTheLand?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawOfTheLand/~4/2Ls2lFfyByk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/6th-circuit-court-of-appeals-dismisses-constitutional-claims-over-regulation-of-advertisements-on-benches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/00651b4ab9f7af0f240c5e5ee91ce49d?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patty Salkin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/6th-circuit-court-of-appeals-dismisses-constitutional-claims-over-regulation-of-advertisements-on-benches/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

