Plaintiff is a Forensic Social Worker in The Legal Aid Society’s Parole Revocation Defense (“PRDU”) Unit. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff has ankylosing spondylitis and underwent medical treatment that rendered her immunocompromised. According to the complaint, Plaintiff sought a disability-based accommodation that would allow her to limit unnecessary courthouse exposure while remaining available to attend court when her physical presence was needed for client meetings, attorney support, hearings, or other court-related needs.

The complaint alleges that, rather than provide interim protection or conduct a good-faith individualized assessment, The Legal Aid Society required Plaintiff to remain physically present in court or the courthouse for up to seven hours per day during several court-coverage days, including when no client-specific or attorney-specific need required her physical presence. Plaintiff alleges that she had previously performed her job by working from The Legal Aid Society office across the street from the Bronx courthouse and attending court in-person when needed.

According to the complaint, Plaintiff requested a disability-based accommodation to work from The Legal Aid Society office during onsite court-coverage shifts and to attend court when called, rather than maintaining continuous courthouse presence. The complaint alleges that The Legal Aid Society denied her disability-based accommodation request on January 20, 2026, asserted that in-person/onsite court coverage was an essential function of the PRDU Forensic Social Worker role, and failed to provide an effective interim accommodation while the request was pending.

The complaint further alleges that The Legal Aid Society re-characterized Plaintiff’s job duties after she sought an accommodation, demanded unnecessary additional medical documentation, failed to engage in a good-faith cooperative dialogue, and retaliated against Plaintiff and similarly situated employees who requested disability-based accommodations or opposed disability accommodation practices.

Plaintiff alleges that, during the period when her accommodation request remained unresolved, she was required to continue disputed in-person court coverage without interim protection. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants’ refusal to provide interim protection required unnecessary or excessive courthouse exposure while she was immunocompromised and materially increased her risk of infection.

The complaint further alleges that other Legal Aid Society employees experienced similar accommodation-related practices. It seeks certification of four proposed classes: (1) a Location-Based Accommodation Class for employees who requested work-location, remote-work, reduced-presence, or exposure-limiting accommodations, (2) a Post-Request Job-Duty Recharacterization Class for employees whose duties or asserted essential functions were allegedly changed after they requested accommodations, (3) a NYCHRL Accommodation Delay Class for employees whose requests were allegedly delayed, including without interim measures, and (4) an Additional Medical Documentation Class for employees allegedly required to provide unnecessary or excessive medical documentation.

The ten-count complaint asserts claims under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the New York City Human Rights Law. The complaint’s claims include: alleged failure to reasonably accommodate; retaliation; interference, coercion, threats, and intimidation; medical inquiry violations; unlawful qualification standards and screening; failure to engage in a cooperative dialogue; and aiding and abetting liability against the individual defendants under the NYCHRL.

Among other requested relief, Plaintiff seeks class-wide declaratory and injunctive relief requiring lawful, timely, individualized accommodation procedures, prompt interim measures while accommodation requests are pending, limits on allegedly unnecessary medical-documentation demands, as well as training, monitoring, and other forward-looking relief. As to declaratory relief, Plaintiff also seeks a declaration that The Legal Aid Society’s alleged conduct was willful and undertaken with reckless disregard for the rights of Plaintiff and the proposed classes.

Plaintiff also seeks individual relief including back pay, front pay, reinstatement and/or full grant of the requested accommodation, compensatory damages, punitive damages under the NYCHRL, nominal damages, actual damages, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, costs, and interest.

The case is Kubicki v. The Legal Aid Society, et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-03882, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The complaint contains allegations only. The Court has not made any findings on the merits, and Defendants have not been adjudicated liable for any of the alleged conduct.

CASE INFORMATION

Southern District of New York
Kubicki v. The Legal Aid Society, et al.
Case No. 1:26-cv-03882

Former Prosecutors Continue to Deliver Hard-Hitting Defense While Expanding Attorney Wellness Initiatives

PARSIPPANY, NJ – The Bianchi Law Group, LLC, a premier New Jersey criminal defense firm founded by former prosecutors, proudly celebrates 13 years of serving clients across all 21 counties of New Jersey. Founded in 2013 by Robert A. Bianchi, Esq., former Morris County Prosecutor, and David J. Bruno, Esq., former Major Crimes Assistant Prosecutor, the firm has built a reputation for aggressive, knowledgeable criminal defense rooted in insider prosecutorial experience.

“After leaving the Prosecutor’s Office, Bob and I were excited to build BLG from the ground up, and 13 years later, we are still standing, still fighting, and still growing,” said David J. Bruno, founding partner at The Bianchi Law Group. 

What sets The Bianchi Law Group apart is the rare combination of credentials and experience that its founding partners bring to the table. Robert A. Bianchi served as Morris County Prosecutor from 2007 to 2013, appointed by the Governor of New Jersey and unanimously confirmed by the New Jersey Senate. He is the only practicing criminal defense attorney in New Jersey who is both a New Jersey Supreme Court Certified Criminal Trial Attorney and a former Governor-appointed County Prosecutor.

David J. Bruno served alongside Bianchi in the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office from 2007 to 2013, where he was assigned to the Major Crimes Unit prosecuting the most serious criminal offenses, as well as the Professional Standards Unit monitoring police misconduct and the Fraud Unit investigating white collar crimes.

Both partners hold the prestigious designation of Certified Criminal Trial Attorney by the New Jersey Supreme Court, a credential held by less than 1% of the more than 93,000 attorneys licensed in New Jersey.

The transition from prosecution to criminal defense was driven by a deep understanding of the justice system and a commitment to ensuring fair representation for those accused of crimes.

“Our team of former prosecutors brings the kind of experience and dedication that allows us to deliver hard-hitting criminal defense work. We do this while Bob and I expand our reach to serve more people through both representation and our attorney wellness and performance mindset initiatives,” Bruno added.

The firm’s attorneys understand prosecution strategies, courtroom procedures, and the inner workings of the New Jersey criminal justice system from years of experience on the other side. This insider knowledge has proven invaluable in defending clients facing charges ranging from criminal cases and domestic violence to complex white collar crimes and serious felonies.

Beyond case results, the firm has made a commitment to giving back to the legal community by lecturing or numerous Bar Associations, as well as, supporting attorney wellness, an often-overlooked aspect of legal practice. The firm’s attorney wellness initiatives reflect the partners’ dedication to supporting their colleagues and promoting a healthier, more sustainable approach to legal practice.

“Thirteen years ago, we set out to build a different kind of criminal defense firm, one grounded in prosecutorial experience and unwavering commitment to our clients. Today, I’m proud of what we’ve accomplished, not just in the courtroom, but in giving back to the legal community and supporting our colleagues through our attorney wellness initiatives. This is only the beginning.” This is not to mention all of the mentoring and performance mindset practices we give to the entire community of lawyers, and non-lawyers alike,” said Robert A. Bianchi, founding partner at The Bianchi Law Group.

Robert Bianchi and David Bruno have become a prominent legal voice on national television, having appeared as legal analysts on Court TV, CNN, ABC, FOX News, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC. Bianchi served for 6 years as a host and anchor at the Law & Crime Network, providing expert commentary on high profile criminal cases across the country. Both he and David host the Nothing but the Truth Podcast–a show about resilience and mindset practices. 

Throughout their career, Robert and Dave have been recognized with numerous awards, including:

• Prosecutor of the Year Award from the New Jersey Narcotics Enforcement Officers Association
• Honored speaker for both the Hudson and Morris County 200 Club(s)
• District Attorney of the Year Award from the National Council of Columbia Associations in Civil Service
• Community Service Award from the New York/New Jersey Asian-American Law Enforcement Advisory Board
• Man of the Year from the Italian American Police Society of New Jersey
• Man of the Year from The Columbian Foundation
• Bianchi Proudly serves his community as an EMT and rides as a volunteer ambulance member for the South Orange Rescue Squad. 

The Bianchi Law Group provides comprehensive legal representation in the following practice areas:

• Criminal Defense
• DWI/DUI Defense
• Domestic Violence Defense
• Municipal Court Cases
• Juvenile Crimes
• Drug Offenses
• Assault & Aggravated Assault
• Sex Crimes Defense
• White Collar Crimes
• Theft Crimes
• Murder & Manslaughter Defense
• Appeals
• Restraining Orders

The firm serves clients in all 21 counties of New Jersey, with a particular focus on Morris County, Monmouth County, Somerset County, Bergen County, and surrounding areas. Offices are located in Parsippany, with a strong presence serving Morristown and the greater Morris County region, as well as offices in Red Bank, NJ. .

As The Bianchi Law Group enters its next chapter, the firm remains committed to its founding principles: aggressive advocacy, insider prosecutorial knowledge, and unwavering dedication to client service.

“We are deeply grateful for every client who trusted us, every colleague who sends referrals our way, and a community that has supported us every step of the journey,” said Bruno. “The first 13 years built the foundation. The best is still ahead, and we are committed to delivering impact, service, and community at the highest level.”

The firm continues to expand its services while maintaining the personalized attention and high-level representation that has become its hallmark. With a team of former prosecutors who understand the system from the inside, The Bianchi Law Group is uniquely positioned to defend clients facing criminal charges and to advocate for those injured by the negligence of others.

For more information, visit bianchilawgroup.com.

In a highly competitive championship round, MSLAW faced Case Western Reserve University School of Law, which ultimately secured the national title in an exceptionally close and hard-fought trial. MSLAW’s second-place finish marks the first time in the school’s history that it has advanced to the National Championship Final, building on its previous record of multiple Top 4 finishes.

“This achievement reflects the extraordinary talent, preparation, and determination of our students,” said MSLAW faculty. “They continue to demonstrate that MSLAW competitors are among the very best in the country.”

The 2025–2026 competition centered on a complex double murder case set in a Philadelphia condominium. Students were challenged to analyze crime scene evidence, autopsy and forensic reports, and argue motions in limine to admit or exclude key evidence. Competitors conducted full trial proceedings, including opening statements, direct and cross-examinations of lay and expert witnesses, and closing arguments. Each four-person team argued both prosecution and defense sides, with students rotating roles as attorneys and witnesses.

MSLAW competed against 18 of the nation’s top law school teams—each a regional champion—progressing through multiple elimination rounds:

• Sweet 16: Defeated University of Maryland (Mid-Atlantic Regional Winner)
• Elite 8: Defeated Florida State University (Southern Regional Champion)
• Final Four: Defeated Syracuse University in a rematch of the NEBLSA regional competition
• Championship Round: Competed against Case Western Reserve University School of Law

The MSLAW team representing the school at the National Finals included:

• Klara Fleury (Brockton, MA)
• Kevin Marful (Worcester, MA)
• Sophia Basile (Rowley, MA)
• Julio Hernandez (Chelsea, MA)

Additional MSLAW Trial Team members who placed second in the Northeast Region of NBLSA include:
Marc Fevry, Dzidzai Mashoko, Cin Duran Valdez, Ashley Lopez Dishmey, Thor White, Farrah Kannan, Justin Fairbanks, and Preston Jackson-Stephens.

The team is coached by Professor Amy Dimitriadis and Professor Dan Harayda, whose leadership and mentorship have been instrumental in the program’s continued national success.

This milestone achievement underscores MSLAW’s commitment to practical legal training and excellence in advocacy, preparing students to excel in real-world courtroom environments.

About the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover
The Massachusetts School of Law provides an academically rigorous and affordable legal education with a focus on advocacy, ethics, and professional skills, preparing graduates to become effective lawyers and leaders in their communities.

Media Contact:
Rohit Bhasin, J.D.
Director of Admissions and Marketing
ro@mslaw.edu

The Center Square was launched in 2019 to fulfill the need for high-quality statehouse and statewide news across the United States. The focus of our work is federal, state and local government accountability and economic reporting. A taxpayer sensibility distinguishes our work from other coverage of federal, state and local issues. As a result of this approach, our readers are better informed about the focus of government and its cost to the citizens whose tax dollars fund governmental decisions.

According to Michael Arrigo, “All 50 states and three territories have a Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, a joint federal-state agency that investigates and prosecutes not only the abuse and neglect of recipients in hospitals and nursing homes but also fraud by Medicaid providers.” 

Michael Arrigo is the CEO of No World Borders. The company provides expert witnesses for civil and criminal litigation in medical billing disputes involving usual customary and reasonable (UCR) charges for medical bills in personal injury litigation, performs medical record audits to determine the accuracy of medical coding in alleged civil overpayment disputes between providers and health plans, and fraud expert analysis.  The company’s founder Michael Arrigo has been admitted as an expert by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Court and State Courts. He is admitted as an expert in medical billing, electronic health records, HIPAA privacy, HIPAA security rule, cybersecurity in healthcare, physician compensation, and corporate governance.

eFraud Investigator was built to bridge the gap between discovery and forensic analysis. While traditional e-discovery tools make documents searchable, they rarely make the numbers usable. This new platform extracts, digitizes, and mathematically verifies financial transactions from static PDFs, allowing legal teams to get to the truth faster.

Defensible Data for Court

“Attorneys have been burned by software that guesses at numbers,” says Barbara Steinberg, CEO of eFraud Services. “In litigation, data integrity is everything. eFraud Investigator delivers virtually 100% extraction accuracy and automatically verifies every transaction against the statement’s ending balance — ensuring the evidence you present is mathematically identical to the source documents provided in discovery.”

Key Capabilities for Litigators:

• Handle Redactions & Rotations: The AI is trained to handle the specific “messy” reality of subpoenaed records.
• Immediate Case Triage: A built-in dashboard visualizes the flow of funds instantly, allowing attorneys to decide if a case is worth pursuing before investing in hours of forensic accounting.
• Cost Recovery: Drastically reduces the billable hours associates spend on manual data entry.

This ruling follows the previously reported hung jury and mistrial in November 2025. As detailed in Aiello Harris Abate, Law Group PC, Achieves Hung Jury in Federal Tax-Fraud Trial of New Jersey CPA, defense attorneys James A. Abate and Jay J. Freireich of Aiello Harris Abate Law Group PC secured the hung-jury outcome after deliberations were unable to reach a unanimous verdict. At that time, the Honorable Zahid N. Quraishi, U.S.D.J.  reserved decision on a pending motion for acquittal.

In a detailed written Opinion and Order issued on February 13, 2026, the Court determined that the Government failed to present sufficient evidence from which a rational jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Applying the standard under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, the Court concluded that the evidence did not establish that Mr. Demba willfully violated a known legal duty — a required element in criminal tax prosecutions.

The tax fraud case involved Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) credit calculations, an area the Court recognized as particularly complex within federal tax law. The Opinion emphasized that inaccuracies alone are insufficient to prove criminal intent and that the Government failed to negate Mr. Demba’s good-faith belief regarding the methodology used.

The Court further found insufficient evidence to support the obstruction charge, concluding that the record did not establish corrupt intent beyond a reasonable doubt. The Judgment of Acquittal prevents retrial under double jeopardy principles and brings the matter to a final resolution.

Aiello Harris Abate Law Group PC, which represents clients in complex criminal defense matters including Federal and New Jersey tax fraud cases, successfully defended Mr. Demba throughout the proceedings, led by James A. Abate and Jay J. Freireich.

CASE INFORMATION

United States District Court – District Of New Jersey – Trenton, NJ
United States of America v. Christopher Ward Demba
Case No. 3:25-cr-00032-ZNQ

Over the past decade and a half, Bixon has built a reputation for determined advocacy, personalized client support, and strategic courtroom representation. Now, as he celebrates this professional milestone, he continues defending clients facing a wide range of criminal charges, including drug-related offenses, theft crimes, weapons charges, and DUI.

“Fifteen years in practice has reinforced one thing for me, every person deserves a strong and unwavering defense,” said Michael Bixon. “Being accused of a crime can turn someone’s world upside down in an instant. My goal is to step in immediately, protect my client’s rights, and fight for their future from day one.”

Bixon Law handles a wide range of criminal defense matters, including:

• Drug possession charges
• Drug trafficking allegations
• Marijuana-related offenses
• Weapons charges
• Assault and battery
• Theft crimes
• DUI and other serious offenses

Michael Bixon has secured favorable outcomes for clients facing charges ranging from misdemeanors to the most severe felony accusations, including dismissals in cases involving violent crime allegations and major drug offenses.

“Every case deserves attention, preparation, and a defense strategy tailored to the individual,” Bixon added. “I don’t believe in treating people like case numbers. I believe in treating them like human beings who deserve a real chance to be heard.”

Courtroom Experience and National Media Insight

In addition to his work in the courtroom, Michael Bixon has gained recognition through appearances on CourtTV, where he has provided legal insight and commentary on high-profile criminal cases. His media presence reflects a deep understanding of criminal law, trial strategy, and the realities defendants face within the justice system.

“CourtTV gives the public a window into how complex criminal cases really are,” said Bixon. “But what matters most to me is applying that knowledge and experience directly to the people here in Atlanta who need a strong defense when everything is on the line.”

Commitment to Clients, 24/7 Support, and Fair Representation

Known for being accessible and client-focused, Bixon emphasizes communication and support throughout the legal process.

“When someone is facing any kind of criminal accusation, fear and uncertainty come with it,” Bixon said. “My job is to bring clarity, guidance, and aggressive advocacy so my clients never feel like they’re facing the system alone.”

Bixon Law serves clients across the Atlanta metro area and is committed to defending the constitutional rights of the accused while pursuing the best possible outcomes through negotiation, litigation, or trial when necessary.

About Michael Bixon

Michael Bixon earned his Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Central Florida before receiving his Juris Doctorate from Barry University School of Law. He clerked in criminal and constitutional law matters early in his career and later became a Senior Associate Attorney at the Reynolds Law Group after moving to Atlanta.

He has also volunteered extensively with the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyer Foundation, assisting clients with housing and debt-related legal matters.

Michael Bixon is a member of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, the Georgia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and is a graduate of the Bill Daniel Trial Program.

Bixon Law is a criminal defense firm based in downtown Atlanta, Georgia, located at 260 Peachtree Street NW, Suite 2200. The firm represents clients throughout the Atlanta metropolitan area and surrounding counties, providing strategic defense in state and local courts across Georgia.

Byrd Davis Alden & Henrichson will distribute $25 Uber vouchers to help Austin residents ring in 2026 safely. The credits are limited to one per person and valid exclusively within the Austin area from 7:00 PM on December 31, 2025, through 4:00 AM on January 1, 2026.

To claim a credit, visit https://byrddavis.com/helping-austin-get-home-safely/, scroll to the bottom of the page, and enter the mobile number or email associated with your Uber account. The $25 credit will be automatically deposited into qualifying accounts on the morning of December 31st.

“New Year’s Eve should be about celebration, not tragedy,” said Kevin Henrichson, Partner at Byrd Davis Alden & Henrichson. “We’ve expanded our program this year because we want even more Austin residents to have a safe ride home.”

Throughout their 66 years serving Austin families, the firm has witnessed the devastating impact of holiday impaired driving incidents firsthand, motivating their continued investment in prevention efforts.

“Behind every DWI statistic is a shattered family,” Henrichson explained. “We’ve represented parents who’ve lost children, children who’ve lost parents, and spouses left to pick up the pieces. When getting home safely is as simple as opening an app, there’s absolutely no excuse for impaired driving.”

Texas Impaired Driving Reality:

• A DWI-related death occurs every 7 hours and 2 minutes in Texas
• In 2024, 26.2% of all Texas traffic fatalities involved alcohol, according to TxDOT
• DWI penalties can exceed $17,000 in fines, legal fees, and associated costs

To secure your free New Year’s Eve Uber credit, visit https://byrddavis.com/helping-austin-get-home-safely/.

Somerville, New Jersey – The tragic deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, and the subsequent arrest of their son Nick have raised numerous legal and financial questions for many people. Among those questions is, can and should Nick, as the accused killer, still receive his inheritance? The short answer is not likely.

Although parricide is rare, it accounts for approximately 2% of homicides in the United States, and of that number, only about a quarter involve the killing of both parents.

While investigators work to piece together evidence in this parricide case, and try to bring the Reiner family justice through the criminal system, important legal and financial questions remain for the three other Reiner children: Jake, Romy, and Tracy (adopted). Rob Reiner, an accomplished Hollywood director, and his wife, Michele, had an estimated net worth of over $200 million. Many have asked whether Nick Reiner would still be entitled to any inheritance from his parents.

Under California’s Probate Code, sections 250-259 (also known as the “Slayer Statute”), if Nick is found to have “feloniously and intentionally” killed his parents, he would be precluded from receiving “any property, interest, or benefit under a will of the decedent, or a trust created by or for the benefit of the decedent or in which the decedent has an interest.” California’s Slayer Statute goes on with more specificity as to all kinds of other prohibitions against Nick, but the overall spirit and language of the law is clear. Children who kill a parent are not entitled to receive estate benefits from the person they killed.   

Of course, since Nick Reiner has not yet been convicted, and is still presumed innocent under the law, he could try to make an argument that he is entitled to at least some portions of his parents’ estate until the conclusion of the murder trial. Such monies could help fund his legal defense. However, if the other beneficiaries of the estate desire to stop such preliminary distributions, they also could bring their own action in California Probate Court to try prevent any proceeds from being distributed until after the murder trial has concluded.

What all of this means is that, while all four Reiner children will have to say goodbye to their parents, Nick likely will also have to say goodbye to his parents’ money.

Theresa A. Lyons, Esq., MSW is a lawyer, social worker, and the Managing Partner of Lyons & Associates, PC, a law firm that represents clients in many matters, including estate planning and litigation issues.  Fabian T. Ardila is a law student at Seton Hall University and also serves as a 2ndLieutenant Firefighter in Raritan New Jersey. They can be reached at 908-575-9777.  www.lyonspc.com 

HMW Law’s New Year Safe Ride Campaign offers 100 free Uber or Lyft vouchers, helping participants get home safely after their celebrations. Each voucher is valued at $20 and can be used through Uber or Lyft between 5:00 PM on December 31, 2025, and 11:59 PM on January 1, 2026.

Reserve your voucher by December 29, 2025, by completing the form on HMW Law’s campaign page.

“We see too many cases that start with one avoidable decision,” said Brandon Henderson, managing partner of HMW Law. “This campaign is about giving people an easy, no-excuses option. If we can help one person make the safer choice, it’s worth it.”

Taking Action During a High-Risk Holiday

The National Safety Council projects nearly 375 traffic fatalities nationwide over the New Year’s holiday period, with drunk driving as a leading cause. In response, HMW Law—The Ohio Trial Attorneys is encouraging people to plan ahead and use rideshare services to avoid tragic consequences.

Open to residents in Cleveland and surrounding areas, the firm’s campaign seeks to prevent DUI-related incidents and support community well-being through direct action.

How to Participate

• Sign Up by December 29: Complete the short form on HMW Law’s campaign page to reserve your voucher.
• Use on New Year’s Eve or Day: Vouchers are valid for Uber or Lyft from December 31 at 5:00 PM through January 1 at 11:59 PM.
• One Per Person: Limited quantity available—early sign-ups encouraged.

Mr. Leal had previously been convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (fentanyl) in the 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County.

In a challenge brought by Ordiway PLLC, the defense argued that the trial record affirmatively showed only eleven jurors were empaneled and sworn. Under the Texas Constitution and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a felony jury must consist of twelve persons unless that right is expressly waived by the defendant.

The State argued that the issue was forfeited because the defense did not object during the trial. Nevertheless, the Fifth Court of Appeals rejected this argument. In the opinion authored by Justice Mike Lee, the Court held that the right to a twelve-person jury is fundamental and cannot be waived by silence.

“The record matters,” Justice Lee wrote in the Court’s opinion. “We cannot assume there were twelve jurors when the record shows only eleven. Therefore, we hold that Leal’s conviction was obtained in violation of his constitutional right to a jury consisting of twelve jurors.”

Brett Ordiway, lead appellate counsel for Mr. Leal, commented on the significance of the ruling:

“This decision reaffirms that the procedural safeguards guaranteed by the Texas Constitution are non-negotiable. While the charge in this case was serious, the integrity of the jury system requires that every felony defendant be tried by a full jury of twelve, unless they explicitly agree otherwise. We are pleased that the Fifth Court of Appeals recognized this structural error and upheld the rule of law.”

The case, Richard Eric Leal v. The State of Texas (No. 05-24-00446-CR), has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

CASE INFORMATION

The Fifth Court of Appeals
Richard Eric Leal v. The State of Texas
No. 05-24-00446-CR

As an institution dedicated to providing a practical and affordable legal education, MSLAW is committed to preparing students for fulfilling careers in law and leadership roles across diverse sectors. The school distinguishes itself through its emphasis on ethics, advocacy, leadership, and professional skills, aiming to equip graduates with the tools necessary for making a societal contribution and advancement.

Notably, MSLAW eschews the traditional reliance on the LSAT in its admissions process, opting instead for personal interviews and a unique MSLAW Essay Aptitude Test. MSLAW offers rolling admissions and stands as the most cost-effective law school in New England, a fact that resonates with students mindful of their financial commitments. The curriculum integrates professional skill training, enabling graduates to explore rewarding career opportunities without the financial burdens that often accompany a legal education.

To further accommodate diverse needs, MSLAW offers flexible scheduling options, including both day and evening programs. This flexibility allows students to balance their legal education with work, family, and other obligations.

The school’s faculty, comprised of experienced practitioners, brings real-world insights to the classroom, enhancing the learning experience and ensuring that students are well-prepared for the challenges of the legal profession.

Prospective students are encouraged to attend the Open House to engage directly with the MSLAW community and learn more about the opportunities available to them. The event serves as an introduction to an educational environment where affordability, practicality, and personal growth are prioritized, aligning with the school’s mission to nurture future leaders in law, business, and technology.

For those considering a legal education that aligns with their lifestyle, budget, and professional aspirations, the Massachusetts School of Law offers a promising path forward.

For liability in the first damages phase, the jury has awarded $1,041,667 for wrongful termination, $1,051,667 for whistleblower retaliation, $666,667 for breach of contract, and varying amounts against the individual defendants and Yolo Food Bank for what Plaintiffs alleged was a campaign of defamation culminating in a press release issued by Yolo Feed Bank. Defamation damages against all individual defendants and Yolo Food Bank so far total approximately $240,000. The punitive damages phase of the deliberations will continue later in the month when the jury will decide on the amount of punitive damages to award.

“This verdict vindicates Mr. Bisch’s four years of exemplary service to Yolo County’s most vulnerable residents,” said Sanjiv N. Singh, lead counsel for Mr. Bisch, and veteran catastrophic loss litigator with major settlements and/or verdicts for high profile cases against The Boeing Company, Los Angeles County, American Airlines,  Level 10, Webcor, The Jay Paul Company, and numerous confidential settlements with major firms, charities, and corporations. “Mr. Bisch should be heralded as a champion of nonprofit accountability—he fought a long and hard battle to seek justice for retaliation and refused to capitulate when his Board gave in to improper pressure and conflicted interests.”

Michael B. Indrajana, Mr. Singh’s long standing co-counsel in 75 claims against Boeing in two separate crashes, sat second chair for what was his first jury trial. “It was a privilege to have worked by Michael Bisch’s side on this groundbreaking lawsuit,” Mr. Indrajana added.

Evidence at trial showed a systematic campaign to discredit Bisch, including false allegations that were not true and not properly investigated. Yolo Food Bank Board members’ own testimony revealed they likely conducted no meaningful investigation of allegations against Mr. Bisch. Evidence showed defendants’ explanations for termination were likely pretextual and constantly shifting. Multiple former employees testified to the positive transformation of the organization under Mr. Bisch’s leadership.

Singh added that, “This verdict sends a clear message that nonprofit executives cannot be terminated for fulfilling their ethical obligations and protecting the interests of the community.”

CASE REFERENCE: Michael Bisch v. Yolo Food Bank, et al., Yolo County Superior Court Case No. CV2022-1431

The firm’s new space reflects its continued growth and commitment to providing clients with personalized, results-driven legal representation in a more modern, accessible environment. Located near the heart of downtown Syracuse, the new office offers convenient access and improved facilities for client consultations, team collaboration, and community engagement. 

This move marks an exciting new chapter for CDH Law. It will allow the firm to serve its clients better and continue delivering the highest quality of legal advocacy they’ve come to expect.

CDH Law’s attorneys will continue to represent individuals and families across Central New York in matters involving:

• Criminal defense
• Family and matrimonial law
• Personal injury
• Estate planning
• Real estate

The firm looks forward to welcoming both new and returning clients to its new location and continuing to serve as a trusted advocate throughout Central New York’s legal community. To learn more about CDH Law or to schedule a consultation at the new office, please visit our website at https://lawcdh.com.

Case Background

The U.S. Department of Justice announced in January 2025 that Demba, owner of Demba & Associates CPA LLC in Hillsborough, had been indicted on 55 counts of aiding and assisting in preparing false tax returns and obstructing the Internal Revenue Service.

Following pre-trial motions and evidentiary rulings, prosecutors proceeded to trial on 19 counts involving alleged false entries on client returns from 2018 to 2023.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mark McDonald and Alexis Hughes accused Demba of operating a “factory of fraud.” They alleged he invented figures—particularly “prior-year minimum-tax credits” on IRS Form 8801—to reduce client liabilities and later supplied fabricated worksheets to IRS auditors to conceal discrepancies.

The government sought to show that Demba intentionally falsified data to keep clients returning for his services, calling a series of IRS agents and former clients to testify. Dozens of tax returns and internal spreadsheets were admitted into evidence.

Defense: Complex Tax Rules, Not Criminal Intent

Representing Demba, James A. Abate and Jay J. Freireich maintained that the discrepancies stemmed from the complexity of federal tax law, not deliberate fraud. They emphasized that Demba was a licensed CPA with more than 30 years of practice, had cooperated with auditors, and that no evidence showed personal gain.

“Even if some returns contained errors, that does not make them crimes,” said James A. Abate, managing partner of Aiello Harris Abate, Law Group PC. “The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any mistakes were willful and intended to defraud. The jury’s split confirms that intent was never proven.”

“Federal tax law—especially rules governing the Alternative Minimum Tax carry-forward credit—is difficult even for professionals,” added Jay J. Freireich, trial counsel at the firm. “Our client acted in good faith and used accepted accounting methods. The jury recognized the reasonable doubt that existed.”

Under cross-examination, IRS Revenue Agent Thomas Mazur conceded that Form 8801 credits can produce inconsistent calculations even within IRS review systems. Several clients testified that they never discussed those figures and relied on Demba’s professional judgment.

Outcome and Implications

After two days of deliberation, the jury reported it was deadlocked on all counts, and Judge Quraishi declared a mistrial. No conviction was entered, and Mr. Demba remains presumed innocent. Prosecutors have not yet announced whether to seek a retrial or pursue a negotiated resolution.

Legal observers note that the outcome illustrates the difficulty of proving willful criminal intent in complex financial and tax-preparer cases. The court’s emphasis on the requirement that conduct be “willful and knowing” was central to the defense’s success.

“Professionals accused of tax fraud deserve the same presumption of innocence as anyone else,” said James A. Abate. “This verdict reinforces that accounting disagreements and technical misinterpretations cannot automatically be treated as crimes.”

CASE INFORMATION

United States District Court of New Jersey, Trenton
United States of America vs. Christopher Ward Demba
Case No. 3:25-cr-00032-ZNQ-1

Washington, D.C. – [November 3, 2025] — Marino Finley LLP is proud to announce that nationally recognized trial attorney Billy Martin has joined the firm as Of Counsel in our Washington, D.C. office.

A former federal prosecutor, seasoned trial lawyer, and one of the most sought-after litigators in the United States, Mr. Martin has earned a reputation as a trusted advocate in many sensitive, high-visibility cases. His ability to navigate challenging legal and media environments makes him a valued addition to our litigation practice.

Mr. Martin is widely known for his decades of experience handling high-stakes litigation, exceptional courtroom skills, and for representing high-profile clients, professional athletes, entertainers, celebrities, and public and political figures in complex civil and criminal matters. His career has been defined by discretion, strategic acumen, and an unwavering commitment to justice.

“We have been partners at big law in the past and we are thrilled to re-unite with Billy at Marino Finley,” said Dan Marino.  “Billy’s track record of success in the courtroom, combined with his deep integrity and judgment, enhances our ability to serve clients in matters where the stakes—and the scrutiny—are highest.”

Mr. Martin has received numerous honors throughout his career. Among them are being named to the American Trial Lawyers Association’s Top 100 Trial Lawyers list, Best Lawyers in America, D.C. Bar Association’s Legend of the Bar, National Law Journal’s “50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers,” ranked 4^th in Washingtonian Magazine’s List of Top Lawyers, and featured by both Black Enterprise Magazine and Ebony Magazine. He has also been selected for inclusion in the Washington, D.C., Super Lawyers from 2007 to 2024.

“I have respected the work of this firm throughout my career and am thrilled to join this powerhouse litigation team where clients are the first priority and the highest bar of legal excellence is upheld,” says Mr. Martin.

Mr. Martin’s arrival enables Marino Finley to harness the experience gained from having tried more than 250 jury trials in jurisdictions across the country. Marino Finley handles civil and criminal litigation matters throughout the United States. Working with its European affiliate, www.sofoslaw.gr, Marino Finley also handles international arbitrations and criminal matters involving U.S. citizens. For more information, visit www.marinofinley.com.

“There was no investigation,” Sombathy says in the interview. “They had no evidence that he was ever at the crime scene. The case started at the end. They thought they had a suspect and killed the entire criminal investigation.” 

According to Sombathy, the lead investigator was a close relative of the alleged victim, a fact that raised serious concerns about the integrity of the process. Key evidence in the case was overlooked or not secured. Ultimately, cell phone records mapped the defendant’s movements miles away at the time of the shooting. 

“The phone data is scientific evidence. You can’t intimidate it,” Sombathy explains. “It’s always going to be the same.”

At trial, Sombathy centered on credibility and the jury’s duty to “speak the truth,” reminding jurors that the verdict rests on evidence, not character attacks. The jury deliberated for less than an hour before returning not guilty verdicts on the most serious counts.

“The word verdict comes from the Latin ‘to speak the truth,’” says Sombathy. “And I really leaned in on that. I said [to the jury], ‘If we’re speaking the truth, then where’s the video from across the street? Where’s my client’s statement?’”

Sombathy, a former homicide prosecutor who has tried more than 200 jury trials, says the case reinforced a core lesson: “Never assume the police properly investigated a case.” 

Listen to the full episode: “Uncovering the Truth: A Shocking Case of Injustice and Flawed Investigation.”

To earn this elite designation, Benavides completed advanced coursework in Forensic Chromatography, Forensic Drug Analysis, and Forensic Principles of DUID through Axion Laboratories in Chicago, Illinois. The certification identifies attorneys who apply scientifically validated principles in the courtroom to challenge flawed evidence and expose unreliable testing procedures.

“As a Forensic Lawyer-Scientist, I believe every person deserves a defense grounded in truth and science,” said Benavides. “Understanding the chemistry behind blood, breath, and drug testing gives me the tools to hold the state accountable and ensure that my clients’ rights are fully protected.”

With more than 15 years of experience, Eric Benavides is a proven trial attorney known for securing multiple Not Guilty verdicts and countless case dismissals for clients across Texas. He has been consistently recognized by his peers for excellence in criminal defense, including being named a Texas Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2020 to 2023 and a Texas Super Lawyer in 2024, an honor awarded to only five percent of attorneys in the state. He has also been recognized as one of Houston’s Top Lawyers by both Houstonia and H-Texas Magazines and holds a perfect 10.0 AVVO rating with 100 percent positive client reviews.

A graduate of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Trial College in Huntsville, Texas, Benavides is also certified in NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing, often with more training than the officers conducting DUI arrests. His scientific background and courtroom experience uniquely position him to challenge forensic evidence and defend clients facing DWI and criminal charges.

Benavides is a proud member of the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, National College of DUI Defense, DUI Defense Lawyers Association, and the American Chemical Society.

A native of Kingsville, Texas, Benavides graduated as Valedictorian of Academy High School, earned his Bachelor’s degree from the University of Texas, and received his Juris Doctorate from Texas Tech University School of Law.

For more information or to schedule a consultation, visit www.ericbenavides.com or contact Benavides Law Group in Houston, Texas.

MSLAW distinguishes itself in the realm of legal education by providing an academically rigorous yet affordable path to a law degree. The institution stands out by eschewing the conventional LSAT requirement and offering the lowest tuition among law schools on the East Coast. 

By assembling a diverse faculty that includes scholars, judges, and practitioners, MSLAW provides a learning environment rich in real-world experience and diverse perspectives. In contrast to traditional models, MSLAW emphasizes accessibility and practical training. It operates on a rolling admissions basis, allowing applicants the flexibility to apply at any point during the year. 

The November Open House offers a comprehensive introduction to the MSLAW experience. Prospective students will have the opportunity to engage with faculty, explore academic programs, and discover the unique resources available on campus. By attending, they can gain a deeper understanding of how the school prepares its graduates to effectively utilize their legal skills in the service of their clients and communities.

MSLAW maintains a firm commitment to non-discrimination, welcoming individuals from all walks of life. This inclusive ethos is at the heart of the school’s mission to provide a supportive and diverse educational environment. Prospective students are encouraged to visit the Andover campus and experience firsthand the school’s dedication to community-oriented legal education.

With over 125 years of combined experience, the firm’s dedicated team of attorneys understands that everyone deserves a second chance. Whether you are under investigation, recently arrested, convicted, or seeking appeal or post-conviction relief, the firm’s mission is to deliver strong, compassionate, and results-driven legal advocacy.

“Our clients come to us during some of the most difficult times in their lives,” said Robert David Malove, founder and managing attorney. “We can’t promise specific outcomes, but we can guarantee our tireless dedication and the full weight of our legal resources to fight for their rights and future.”

From 6 convenient offices located in Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers, Palm Beach County, St. Lucie County, Key West, and Orlando, The Law Offices of Robert David Malove serves clients across Florida and in federal courts nationwide. This expansion ensures that individuals in Broward County and surrounding areas have greater access to skilled defense attorneys who are deeply committed to achieving justice.

The firm’s experienced legal team provides comprehensive representation for a wide range of cases, including criminal defense, DUI charges, appeals, and post-conviction relief. Each case is meticulously reviewed to build a strong, personalized defense strategy aimed at securing the best possible results.

What sets The Law Offices of Robert David Malove apart is its client-focused approach. The firm encourages potential clients to learn more about its attorneys and paralegals through their detailed bios, which highlight their education, experience, and personal motivations for helping those accused of crimes in Florida.

Clients can easily connect with the firm by calling or filling out the contact form on the website to determine if the team is the right fit for their case.

For more information or to schedule a consultation, visit www.robertmalovelaw.com or contact the Fort Lauderdale office today.