<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyering » Employment Law Information Network</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.elinfonet.com/category/federal/lawyering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.elinfonet.com</link>
	<description>All Things Labor and Employment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Littler Lightbulb – May 2026 Employment Appellate Roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/littler-lightbulb-may-2026-employment-appellate-roundup/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=178294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Littler Lightbulb – May 2026 Employment Appellate Roundup Supreme Court Holds FAAA Does Not Preempt Negligent Hiring Claims Against Freight Brokers  tgelbman@littler.com Mon, 06/08/2026 &#8211; 09:41</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/littler-lightbulb-may-2026-employment-appellate-roundup/">Littler Lightbulb – May 2026 Employment Appellate Roundup</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Steps to Preparing for the Deposition of an Organization</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/five-steps-to-preparing-for-the-deposition-of-an-organization/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldberg Segalla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Corporations and other organizations can be deposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) and state law counterparts. These depositions are unique because the deponent speaks for the corporation, and the testimony binds the entity – not the individual – often with consequences that are difficult to unwind later. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/five-steps-to-preparing-for-the-deposition-of-an-organization/">Five Steps to Preparing for the Deposition of an Organization</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are AI Chats Privileged? Courts Split on Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/are-ai-chats-privileged-courts-split-on-attorney-client-and-work-product-protection/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CDF Labor Law LLP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=164670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Are AI Chats Privileged? Courts Split on Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/are-ai-chats-privileged-courts-split-on-attorney-client-and-work-product-protection/">Are AI Chats Privileged? Courts Split on Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI and the Work-Product Doctrine: A New Frontier &#124; CDF Labor Law LLP</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/ai-and-the-work-product-doctrine-a-new-frontier-cdf-labor-law-llp/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CDF Labor Law LLP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=164514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AI and the Work-Product Doctrine: A New Frontier</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/ai-and-the-work-product-doctrine-a-new-frontier-cdf-labor-law-llp/">AI and the Work-Product Doctrine: A New Frontier | CDF Labor Law LLP</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intersection of AI and Attorney-Client Privilege—A Cautionary Tale</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/the-intersection-of-ai-and-attorney-client-privilege-a-cautionary-tale/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=158346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge in the U.S. Southern District of New York has issued a significant decision at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and legal privilege, ruling that documents generated using a publicly available AI tool are not shielded by attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. The case, United</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/the-intersection-of-ai-and-attorney-client-privilege-a-cautionary-tale/">The Intersection of AI and Attorney-Client Privilege—A Cautionary Tale</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wider Lens on Summary Judgment: What the Eleventh Circuit&#8217;s Decision in Ismael v. Roundtree Means for Employers</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/a-wider-lens-on-summary-judgment-what-the-eleventh-circuits-decision-in-ismael-v-roundtree-means-for-employers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=157381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Florida, Georgia, and Alabama) provides an important reminder for employers: courts must look at the &#8220;entire picture&#8221; when deciding whether a discrimination or retaliation case should go to a jury.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/a-wider-lens-on-summary-judgment-what-the-eleventh-circuits-decision-in-ismael-v-roundtree-means-for-employers/">A Wider Lens on Summary Judgment: What the Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Ismael v. Roundtree Means for Employers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States v. Heppner and AI Discovery: Confidentiality and Privilege
Concerns</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/united-states-v-heppner-and-ai-discovery-confidentiality-and-privilegeconcerns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maynard Nexsen PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - Discovery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=157463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons From Appellate Practice: The Mixed Blessings of Supplemental Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/lessons-from-appellate-practice-the-mixed-blessings-of-supplemental-jurisdiction/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=151285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For plaintiffs and defendants alike, there is a strong temptation to include and keep all claims in one lawsuit. After all, the likely alternative is litigating multiple lawsuits, either at once or serially. Practitioners, however, should remember that federal courts require federal subject matter jurisdiction over all claims before them.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/lessons-from-appellate-practice-the-mixed-blessings-of-supplemental-jurisdiction/">Lessons From Appellate Practice: The Mixed Blessings of Supplemental Jurisdiction</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>They Said What?!: Protect Your Internal Discussions from Disclosure in
Litigation</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/they-said-what-protect-your-internal-discussions-from-disclosure-inlitigation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maynard Nexsen PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - Discovery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=142791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons From Appellate Practice: Inclusive Decision-making May Increase Litigation Risks</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/lessons-from-appellate-practice-inclusive-decision-making-may-increase-litigation-risks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=141327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Discrimination claims turn on the motive for the employment decision at issue. Accordingly, cases often focus on the decision-maker. What comments has he made that might suggest prohibited bias? Whom else has she made decisions about under similar circumstances? What did she know and when did she know it? When</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/lessons-from-appellate-practice-inclusive-decision-making-may-increase-litigation-risks/">Lessons From Appellate Practice: Inclusive Decision-making May Increase Litigation Risks</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Circuit Greenlights FLSA Releases in Rule 23 Opt-Out Settlements</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/third-circuit-greenlights-flsa-releases-in-rule-23-opt-out-settlements/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=140480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Third Circuit Greenlights FLSA Releases in Rule 23 Opt-Out Settlements On October 16, 2025, in a matter of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Lundeen v. 10 West Ferry Street Operations LLC d/b/a Logan Inn,1 that the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) opt-in</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/third-circuit-greenlights-flsa-releases-in-rule-23-opt-out-settlements/">Third Circuit Greenlights FLSA Releases in Rule 23 Opt-Out Settlements</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Littler Lounge: Data Doesn’t Lie – Following the Digital Footprints in Workplace Lawsuits</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/littler-lounge-data-doesnt-lie-following-the-digital-footprints-in-workplace-lawsuits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - Evidence (Lawyering)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=136837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Littler Lounge: Data Doesn’t Lie – Following the Digital Footprints in Workplace Lawsuits Think your digital trail is just background noise? Think again. In this episode, discover how data – from social media to id badge swipes – can alter the trajectory of a workplace lawsuit. Hosts Claire Deason and</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/littler-lounge-data-doesnt-lie-following-the-digital-footprints-in-workplace-lawsuits/">Littler Lounge: Data Doesn’t Lie – Following the Digital Footprints in Workplace Lawsuits</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Employers Need to Know About the Fate of Wider Relief After Trump v. CASA, Inc.</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/what-employers-need-to-know-about-the-fate-of-wider-relief-after-trump-v-casa-inc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump v Casa]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=128356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What Employers Need to Know About the Fate of Wider Relief After Trump v. CASA, Inc. On June 27, 2025, in Trump v. CASA, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that universal injunctions—injunctions that prohibit the federal government from enforcing a law, regulation, order, or policy to any person, not</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/what-employers-need-to-know-about-the-fate-of-wider-relief-after-trump-v-casa-inc/">What Employers Need to Know About the Fate of Wider Relief After Trump v. CASA, Inc.</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, but Does Not Decide on Birthright Citizenship Challenge</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/supreme-court-limits-nationwide-injunctions-but-does-not-decide-on-birthright-citizenship-challenge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=122716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a closely watched decision issued on June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Trump v. CASA, Inc., No. 24A884, that federal district courts lacked authority to issue universal (nationwide) injunctions blocking enforcement of federal policies. While the decision did not resolve the underlying constitutional</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/supreme-court-limits-nationwide-injunctions-but-does-not-decide-on-birthright-citizenship-challenge/">Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, but Does Not Decide on Birthright Citizenship Challenge</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rules Federal District Courts Likely Lack Authority for Universal Injunctions</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/supreme-court-rules-federal-district-courts-likely-lack-authority-for-universal-injunctions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 20:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=120714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States held that federal district courts likely lack the authority to issue universal injunctions blocking presidential actions nationwide, a ruling that is likely to allow the Trump administration to continue enforcing executive orders (EO) or other policies despite legal challenges</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/supreme-court-rules-federal-district-courts-likely-lack-authority-for-universal-injunctions/">Supreme Court Rules Federal District Courts Likely Lack Authority for Universal Injunctions</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
