<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10titles.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemtitles.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Legal Ethics Forum</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-79372</id>
    <updated>2013-05-23T03:56:00-04:00</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LegalEthicsForum" /><feedburner:info uri="legalethicsforum" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="license" type="text/html" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/" /><logo>http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif</logo><entry>
        <title>Ethics links about the future of the profession  (May 23, 2013)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/hPnytiTW4vQ/ethics-odds-and-ends-may-23-2013.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/ethics-odds-and-ends-may-23-2013.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c75ab96970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-23T03:56:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-23T03:56:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Law Technology News: Stanford is a source of innovations in the legal profession. (h/t: ABA Journal) ABA Journal: "Law firm leaders say industry shift permanent, yet don’t list value and efficiency as top concerns" Bernie Burk, at Faculty Lounge, "Proliferation...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/hPnytiTW4vQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/ethics-odds-and-ends-may-23-2013.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Sara Rankin, "The Fully Formed Lawyer: Why Law Schools Should Require Public Service to Better Prepare Students for Private Practice"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/bj0S4UAvhdA/sara-rankin-the-fully-formed-lawyer-why-law-schools-should-require-public-service-to-better-prepare-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/sara-rankin-the-fully-formed-lawyer-why-law-schools-should-require-public-service-to-better-prepare-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191025c6a18970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-23T03:45:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-23T03:45:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: It is now commonly accepted that law schools are graduating students who are under-prepared for practice in the real world. In other words, students that perform adequately in the classroom seem to struggle or suffer — to an...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/bj0S4UAvhdA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/sara-rankin-the-fully-formed-lawyer-why-law-schools-should-require-public-service-to-better-prepare-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Round-ups of coverage of IRS issue</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/RfZzGiSq6V8/round-ups-of-coverage-of-irs-issue.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/round-ups-of-coverage-of-irs-issue.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01910269a29d970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-22T10:14:58-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-22T10:14:58-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Tax Law Prof Blog continues to run full daily round-ups of coverage.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/RfZzGiSq6V8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/round-ups-of-coverage-of-irs-issue.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Laurel Rigertas, "Post-Watergate: The Legal Profession and Respect for the Interests of Third Parties"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/9axgokpyJPs/laurel-rigertas-post-watergate-the-legal-profession-and-respect-for-the-interests-of-third-parties.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/laurel-rigertas-post-watergate-the-legal-profession-and-respect-for-the-interests-of-third-parties.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-22T07:30:23-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aa24d0b6970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-22T03:44:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-22T13:09:16-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: As a result of Watergate, the legal profession’s reputation was badly damaged. Disciplinary action was taken against eighteen lawyers, which prompted the American Bar Association to focus on improving ethical standards and education for lawyers. Over the subsequent...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/9axgokpyJPs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/laurel-rigertas-post-watergate-the-legal-profession-and-respect-for-the-interests-of-third-parties.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Anatomy of a Murder In New York (sort of)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/MHzYAaIAvQI/anatomy-of-a-murder-in-new-york-sort-of.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/anatomy-of-a-murder-in-new-york-sort-of.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-05-22T06:42:06-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aa2d4f7c970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-21T21:51:30-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T21:51:30-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">The video clip from Anatomy of a Murder in which Paul Biegler (Jimmy Stewart) meets with his client Lt. Frederic Manion (Ben Gazzara) and tells him the legal defenses to homicide before asking what happened is, of course, often used...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/MHzYAaIAvQI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Stephen Gillers</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/anatomy-of-a-murder-in-new-york-sort-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>IRS official to take the Fifth (and probably wishes she had chosen candor)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/WW-LhVpRDkg/irs-official-to-take-the-fifth-and-probably-wishes-she-had-chosen-candor.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/irs-official-to-take-the-fifth-and-probably-wishes-she-had-chosen-candor.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aa2b6a39970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-21T16:36:27-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T23:27:39-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">On a day when Senator Hatch accused a lawyer (Steven Miller) of lying by omission for failing to correct earlier false statements to Congress, we are told that another lawyer (Lois Lerner, whose job at the IRS was apparently not...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/WW-LhVpRDkg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/irs-official-to-take-the-fifth-and-probably-wishes-she-had-chosen-candor.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Douglas E. Abrams, " Plagiarism in Lawyers’ Written Advocacy (Part 1)"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/fcE-aSwcIt4/douglas-e-abrams-plagiarism-in-lawyers-written-advocacy-part-1.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/douglas-e-abrams-plagiarism-in-lawyers-written-advocacy-part-1.html" thr:count="6" thr:updated="2013-05-22T15:56:45-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c6677cc970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-21T04:42:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T04:42:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Short article. Abstract: Professor Abrams authors a column, Writing It Right, in Precedent, the Missouri Bar's quarterly magazine. In a variety of contexts, the column stresses the fundamentals of quality legal writing - precision, conciseness, simplicity and clarity. Future columns...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/fcE-aSwcIt4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/douglas-e-abrams-plagiarism-in-lawyers-written-advocacy-part-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>American Bankruptcy Institute issues report on ethics in bankruptcy practice</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/7LDvI4gAgiY/american-bankruptcy-institute-issues-report-on-ethics-in-bankruptcy-practice.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/american-bankruptcy-institute-issues-report-on-ethics-in-bankruptcy-practice.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c5972c7970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-21T03:38:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T03:38:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">With thanks and a hat tip to Richard Carmody, here are some resources about the ABI's recent report on ethics in bankrupty practice. (It reminds me of the ACTEC gloss on the ethics rules.) The final report: Download Final_Report_ABI_Ethics_Task_Force And...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/7LDvI4gAgiY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/american-bankruptcy-institute-issues-report-on-ethics-in-bankruptcy-practice.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New California Opinion on Receiving Ostensibly Privileged Document to which Crime Fraud Exception Might Apply</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/20_MEjcNMUY/new-california-opinion-on-receiving-ostensibly-privileged-document-to-which-crime-fraud-exception-mi.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/new-california-opinion-on-receiving-ostensibly-privileged-document-to-which-crime-fraud-exception-mi.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-05-21T14:23:06-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c66cb64970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-21T03:34:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T03:34:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">California Opinion 2013-188 asks: If an attorney receives from a non-party a confidential written communication between opposing counsel and opposing counsel‟s client, what should the attorney do if the attorney reasonably believes that the communication may not be privileged because...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/20_MEjcNMUY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/new-california-opinion-on-receiving-ostensibly-privileged-document-to-which-crime-fraud-exception-mi.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bad or Stupid? The Lawyers of the Canadian PM</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/qR286u8jCy0/bad-of-stupid-the-lawyers-of-the-canadian-pm.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/bad-of-stupid-the-lawyers-of-the-canadian-pm.html" thr:count="4" thr:updated="2013-05-21T21:37:57-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191025c12cb970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T22:47:05-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T22:57:28-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Some of you may know that this has been an interesting week in Canadian politics. There was the allegedly crack smoking mayor of Toronto (to see the video donate at the "crackstarter" campaign on Gawker) and, as well, a story...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/qR286u8jCy0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Alice Woolley</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/bad-of-stupid-the-lawyers-of-the-canadian-pm.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>DOJ Inspector General's report: US Attorney unlawfully leaked to discredit critic</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/iRCezAzXH4Y/doj-inspector-generals-report-us-attorney-unlawfully-leaked-to-discredit-critic.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/doj-inspector-generals-report-us-attorney-unlawfully-leaked-to-discredit-critic.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c62e804970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T13:50:27-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T14:53:13-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">The Inspector General released a report about an unlawful leak by the then-US-Attorney arising out of the "Fast and Furious" snafu. We discussed the matter when it the issue arose, but now the IG report is out. (We've also repeated...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/iRCezAzXH4Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/doj-inspector-generals-report-us-attorney-unlawfully-leaked-to-discredit-critic.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>The DOJ briefs opposing the Florida and Kentucky ethics opinions on IAC waivers -- and the Virginia opinion</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Y6e355itrYs/the-doj-briefs-opposing-the-florida-and-kentucky-ethics-opinions-on-iac-waivers.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/the-doj-briefs-opposing-the-florida-and-kentucky-ethics-opinions-on-iac-waivers.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-05-21T13:41:41-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c61c3ad970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T11:00:38-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T11:27:42-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">To follow up on a prior post, below are the DOJ briefs asking that the Florida and Kentucky opinions on IAC waivers be vacated. And here is the Virginia opinion, LEO 1857 (which strikes me as overreaching, even though my...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Y6e355itrYs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/the-doj-briefs-opposing-the-florida-and-kentucky-ethics-opinions-on-iac-waivers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Recent Conference on the OLC Torture Memos</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/tV78fAAJ_jM/recent-conference-on-the-olc-torture-memos.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/recent-conference-on-the-olc-torture-memos.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-21T11:26:17-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c592e09970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T03:54:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T03:54:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">[Tigran Edlred passes along this news.] For those with a continuing interest in the OLC torture memos (which have been discussed extensively on LEF), you might be interested in a recent symposium hosted by the New England Journal on Criminal...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/tV78fAAJ_jM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/recent-conference-on-the-olc-torture-memos.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bruce Green, "Federal Criminal Discovery Reform: A Legislative Approach"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/mm8vHl_F_Ic/bruce-green-federal-criminal-discovery-reform-a-legislative-approach.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/bruce-green-federal-criminal-discovery-reform-a-legislative-approach.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb3f8a80970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T03:04:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T03:04:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Given that this is the 50th anniversary of Brady, and given all the inadequacies we've seen in the DOJ's exercise of that duty, isn't it time for a legislatve solution? Abstract: In general, discovery is far narrower in federal...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/mm8vHl_F_Ic" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/bruce-green-federal-criminal-discovery-reform-a-legislative-approach.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Why Not Plant the IRS Question with the Congress?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/0vuXlzN2A7U/why-not-plant-the-irs-question-with-the-congress.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/why-not-plant-the-irs-question-with-the-congress.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191024f63b2970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-19T11:32:42-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T13:44:10-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">After reading the WSJ round-up of testimony about the planted question by the IRS, I have to wonder: if Lois Lerner and Steve Miller spent time that week carefully planting a question for the ABA conference as a vehicle to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/0vuXlzN2A7U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/why-not-plant-the-irs-question-with-the-congress.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Waiving IAC claims (and a bleg for sources, committee opinions, etc.)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/2liZsV0IC1g/waiving-iac-claims-and-a-bleg-for-sources-committee-opinions-etc.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/waiving-iac-claims-and-a-bleg-for-sources-committee-opinions-etc.html" thr:count="4" thr:updated="2013-05-20T14:52:35-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aa17a87a970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-19T11:10:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-19T11:12:15-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Rick Underwood's comment to an earlier post highlighted a hot issue that I'm trying to get a better handle on: the enforceabilty of a waiver of IAC claims by an accused. I found this law review article by Nancy King...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/2liZsV0IC1g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/waiving-iac-claims-and-a-bleg-for-sources-committee-opinions-etc.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Josh Bowers, "Lafler, Frye, and the Subtle Art of Winning by Losing"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/antIstUhF5U/josh-bowers-lafler-frye-and-the-subtle-art-of-winning-by-losing.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/josh-bowers-lafler-frye-and-the-subtle-art-of-winning-by-losing.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-05-19T10:44:48-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb486784970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-19T03:47:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-19T03:47:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: In its recent decisions, Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, the Court recognized defendants’ rights to effective assistance of plea-bargaining counsel. Counter-intuitively, however, it is the government that may come to benefit most from the Court’s rulings...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/antIstUhF5U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/josh-bowers-lafler-frye-and-the-subtle-art-of-winning-by-losing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>OJ Simpson's lawyer fights back (to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/g0tk7QMI_88/oj-simpsons-lawyer-fights-back-to-claims-of-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/oj-simpsons-lawyer-fights-back-to-claims-of-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-19T11:04:17-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb4f9ebf970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-18T15:40:14-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-19T11:26:18-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">News story here. Talk Left has views. There have been recent opinions by the ABA and the DC Bar about the ethics of responding to a former client's claim that you rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. UPDATE. In the comments,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/g0tk7QMI_88" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/oj-simpsons-lawyer-fights-back-to-claims-of-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Viewpoint: Court Struggles to Regulate Attorney Blogging"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/mPs5zaSsr8k/viewpoint-court-struggles-to-regulate-attorney-blogging.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/viewpoint-court-struggles-to-regulate-attorney-blogging.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c510ee7970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-18T12:41:03-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-18T12:41:03-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Richard Zitrin offers this op-ed.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/mPs5zaSsr8k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/viewpoint-court-struggles-to-regulate-attorney-blogging.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Wal-Mart's whistle-blower problem: Public revelations trump privilege"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Mb1CGQQrTCw/wal-marts-whistle-blower-problem-public-revelations-trump-privilege.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/wal-marts-whistle-blower-problem-public-revelations-trump-privilege.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-18T09:00:58-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb4861be970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-18T03:44:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-18T03:44:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Alison Frankel, at Thomson Reuters, has the story. Read the whole thing but here's a key excerpt: "Attorney-client privilege confers powerful protection over confidential corporate documents. But according to a ruling Thursday by Chancellor Leo Strine of Delaware Chancery Court,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Mb1CGQQrTCw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/wal-marts-whistle-blower-problem-public-revelations-trump-privilege.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Rob Bejesky, "An Albatross for the Government Legal Advisor Under MRPC Rule 8.4"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/gnzpmRE7kgk/rob-bejesky-an-albatross-for-the-government-legal-advisor-under-mrpc-rule-84.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/rob-bejesky-an-albatross-for-the-government-legal-advisor-under-mrpc-rule-84.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-18T04:04:32-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191021a01d6970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-18T03:05:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-18T03:05:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Rule 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct requires lawyers to impart honest representations of the law and candid legal advice. Rebuke roused due to advisory opinions furnished by government attorneys who offered an unchecked vision of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/gnzpmRE7kgk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/rob-bejesky-an-albatross-for-the-government-legal-advisor-under-mrpc-rule-84.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>IRS scandal: where were the IRS and WH lawyers?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/WO1H0NIWbfw/irs-scandal-where-were-the-irs-and-wh-lawyers.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/irs-scandal-where-were-the-irs-and-wh-lawyers.html" thr:count="6" thr:updated="2013-05-18T18:56:25-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb457c67970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-17T13:16:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-22T14:47:01-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">UPDATE(5/17): the New York Times is now reporting that the general counsel of the Treasury was informed in 2012, before the election, of the Inspector General's investigation. I have the same questions about that lawyer (as well as IRS and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/WO1H0NIWbfw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/irs-scandal-where-were-the-irs-and-wh-lawyers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Are You Heading to the ABA-CPR Conference in San Antonio?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/91UpEoLxw8A/are-you-heading-to-the-aba-cpr-conference-in-san-antonio.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/are-you-heading-to-the-aba-cpr-conference-in-san-antonio.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191023dc4ad970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-17T12:16:45-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T12:16:45-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Alberto Bernabe passes on this news about meet-ups there. For those of you planning to attend the upcoming ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility in San Antonio, I would like to let you know of two activities organized by the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/91UpEoLxw8A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/are-you-heading-to-the-aba-cpr-conference-in-san-antonio.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Why Was a Senior Advisor to the Secretary of State also Working for a Political Intelligence Firm?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/9UNwRhorU0s/why-was-a-senior-advisor-to-the-secretary-of-state-also-working-for-a-political-intelligence-firm.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/why-was-a-senior-advisor-to-the-secretary-of-state-also-working-for-a-political-intelligence-firm.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb44aadd970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-17T10:40:24-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T10:40:24-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">According to this story, Secretary of State Clinton’s closest advisor at the State Department, Huma Abedin changed her status to part time and became a special government employee (SGE) when she went on maternity leave (this is understandable, particularly when...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/9UNwRhorU0s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Richard Painter</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/why-was-a-senior-advisor-to-the-secretary-of-state-also-working-for-a-political-intelligence-firm.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Class Action a la Francais?"  Is American-style litigation heading to la belle France?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/nE57UI8Lpgg/class-action-a-la-francais-is-american-style-litigation-heading-to-la-belle-france.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/class-action-a-la-francais-is-american-style-litigation-heading-to-la-belle-france.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb40e41c970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-17T03:40:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T03:40:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">McGuire Woods notes that the French are considering allowing a form of class action that is far less robust than we have here in the USA. Still, it seems that some American plaintiffs lawyers are eyeing a chance to go...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/nE57UI8Lpgg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/class-action-a-la-francais-is-american-style-litigation-heading-to-la-belle-france.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Leslie C. Levin, Christine Zozula &amp; Peter Siegelman, " A Study of the Relationship between Bar Admissions Data and Subsequent Lawyer Discipline"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/tjF-0UY6hD0/leslie-c-levin-christine-zozula-peter-siegelman-a-study-of-the-relationship-between-bar-admissions-d.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/leslie-c-levin-christine-zozula-peter-siegelman-a-study-of-the-relationship-between-bar-admissions-d.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c23f32c970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-17T03:01:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T03:01:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: The research reported here uses information from the admissions files of lawyers admitted to the Connecticut bar from 1989 to 1992 to compare those who were disciplined with those who were not disciplined. It analyzes information reported during...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/tjF-0UY6hD0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/leslie-c-levin-christine-zozula-peter-siegelman-a-study-of-the-relationship-between-bar-admissions-d.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Key Amendment Introduced by Minnesota State Representative David FitzSimmons Protects Churches and other Religious Organizations from Frivolous Lawsuits</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/xyMS5yI15k4/key-amendment-introduced-by-minnesota-state-representative-david-fitzsimmons-protects-churches-and-o.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/key-amendment-introduced-by-minnesota-state-representative-david-fitzsimmons-protects-churches-and-o.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102377579970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T15:22:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T10:32:24-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Just because a lawsuit is weak – with no precedent to support it – does not mean a plaintiffs’ lawyer won’t try to bring it. It is a miscarriage of justice when any defendant must spend money defending a frivolous...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/xyMS5yI15k4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Richard Painter</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/key-amendment-introduced-by-minnesota-state-representative-david-fitzsimmons-protects-churches-and-o.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Eliminate the 'C' Grade in Law School?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/RkNhd1Kp37M/eliminate-the-c-grade-in-law-school.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/eliminate-the-c-grade-in-law-school.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-05-17T21:42:48-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb3e7940970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T14:26:15-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T14:26:15-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Professor Joshua M. Silverstein at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock argues yes in his article, A Case for Grade Inflation in Legal Education. The article has been reported in the Wall Street Journal Law Blog and the ABA...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/RkNhd1Kp37M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Brooks Holland</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/eliminate-the-c-grade-in-law-school.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>random thoughts about scandals (e.g., the AG recused but no written record?)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/3Ex8DmnE7Tw/random-thoughts-about-scandals-eg-the-ag-recused-but-no-written-record.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/random-thoughts-about-scandals-eg-the-ag-recused-but-no-written-record.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb3db7ab970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T12:35:20-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T12:35:20-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Attorney General Eric Holder testified that he was recused from the leak investigation that ended up gathering telephone records about AP reporters, but that there is no writing to memorialize the recusal. Are there any experts out there who can...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/3Ex8DmnE7Tw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/random-thoughts-about-scandals-eg-the-ag-recused-but-no-written-record.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Nora Freeman Engstrom, "Attorney Advertising and the Contingency Fee Cost Paradox"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/AQDFrN5UCh4/nora-freeman-engstrom-attorney-advertising-and-the-contingency-fee-cost-paradox.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/nora-freeman-engstrom-attorney-advertising-and-the-contingency-fee-cost-paradox.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-17T09:36:30-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c23ec17970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T04:56:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T04:56:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: It has long been taken as gospel that attorney advertising drives down the cost of legal services. The Supreme Court assumed it when first permitting attorney advertising in the landmark First Amendment case, Bates v. State Bar of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/AQDFrN5UCh4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/nora-freeman-engstrom-attorney-advertising-and-the-contingency-fee-cost-paradox.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>CIA looking for ethics counsel</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Gb0lDHVmcZ4/cia-looking-for-ethics-counsel.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/cia-looking-for-ethics-counsel.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb2a2c67970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T03:57:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T03:57:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Job description here. (h/t Lisa Lerman) Excerpt: The Office of General Counsel is seeking a highly qualified Ethics Counsel at the GS-13 to GS-15 level to join its exciting and challenging legal practice. The ethics practice at CIA provides the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Gb0lDHVmcZ4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/cia-looking-for-ethics-counsel.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Citi: "Law firm managing partners express weakened confidence"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/FdNtcABqkJQ/citi-law-firm-managing-partners-express-weakened-confidence.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/citi-law-firm-managing-partners-express-weakened-confidence.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c395337970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T03:19:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T03:19:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Thomson Reuters carries the story. Excerpt: "Even as the overall economy strengthened in March and April, law firm managing partners expressed increasing pessimism about their firms' financial prospects, according to a new survey by Citi Private Bank. The survey ....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/FdNtcABqkJQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/citi-law-firm-managing-partners-express-weakened-confidence.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Internal investigations, Inspectors General &amp; the Benefits of Accountability </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/MojCQ6AK3j4/internal-investigations-inspectors-general-the-benefits-of-accountability-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/internal-investigations-inspectors-general-the-benefits-of-accountability-.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-15T21:04:07-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb36d3b0970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T20:29:30-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T20:29:30-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Since last Friday, we've all heard that the IRS targeted Tea Party groups for more intense scrutiny of their applications for tax-exempt status. There have been innumerable news stories. Congressional committees are holding hearings on the issue. The Attorney General...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/MojCQ6AK3j4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Kathleen Clark</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/internal-investigations-inspectors-general-the-benefits-of-accountability-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ethics: SF Giant (Affeldt) voluntarily fixes contract error that gave him $500k too much</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/4X4onja6Huk/ethics-sf-giant-affeldt-voluntarily-fixes-contract-error-that-gave-him-500k-too-much.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/ethics-sf-giant-affeldt-voluntarily-fixes-contract-error-that-gave-him-500k-too-much.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191022ece0b970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T19:33:34-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T19:34:55-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Yahoo Sports. San Francisco Giants player Jeremy Affeldt voluntarily corrected a clerical error in his contract and thereby reliniquished $500k. Affeldt says that lawyers told him he could easily hold onto the windfall, but he simply couldn't take the money....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/4X4onja6Huk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/ethics-sf-giant-affeldt-voluntarily-fixes-contract-error-that-gave-him-500k-too-much.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Josh Bowers, "Two Rights to Counsel"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/bye1six_w0M/josh-bowers-two-rights-to-counsel.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/josh-bowers-two-rights-to-counsel.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb2152d8970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T16:54:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T16:54:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: This forthcoming essay argues that there is not one constitutionally recognized right to counsel, but two. There is a right to legal counsel and a right to extralegal counsel. The right to legal counsel applies principally to the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/bye1six_w0M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/josh-bowers-two-rights-to-counsel.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Reduce Student Loans</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/HQJ-tUFdnEA/reduce-student-loans.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/reduce-student-loans.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-05-15T19:22:07-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c353e43970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T12:16:18-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T12:16:18-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">The interest rates on federal student loans will double this July if Congress doesn't take action. Fortunately, Senator Elizabeth Warren has introduced legislation that would provide a one-year fix to the impending doubling of students' rate by setting the student...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/HQJ-tUFdnEA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Monroe Freedman</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/reduce-student-loans.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Profile of Ted Frank, who challenges fee awards in class actions</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/ckoUXs613Is/profile-of-ted-frank-who-challenges-fee-awards-in-class-actions.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/profile-of-ted-frank-who-challenges-fee-awards-in-class-actions.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb22a925970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T03:23:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T03:23:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">The digital version of The American Lawyer carries a profile of Ted Frank, who has built a practice area of objecting to fee awards. Frank blogs at Point of Law.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/ckoUXs613Is" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/profile-of-ted-frank-who-challenges-fee-awards-in-class-actions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>IRS scandal: why reveal at the ABA conference? (The answer isn't flattering to the IRS)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/4WBd6PNTVvw/irs-scandal-why-reveal-at-the-aba-conference-the-answer-isnt-flattering-to-the-irs.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/irs-scandal-why-reveal-at-the-aba-conference-the-answer-isnt-flattering-to-the-irs.html" thr:count="4" thr:updated="2013-05-17T11:43:40-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01910225c61c970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T00:06:12-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T13:52:55-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">UPDATE (5/17): The day this story broke, one week ago, it struck me as odd and troubling that the IRS revealed the news at an ABA conference. I had private correspondence about that over the weekend and made a post...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/4WBd6PNTVvw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/irs-scandal-why-reveal-at-the-aba-conference-the-answer-isnt-flattering-to-the-irs.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Of Lawyers and Journalists: The AP Subpoenas</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/ufA2WiCivB8/of-lawyers-and-journalists-the-ap-subpoenas.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/of-lawyers-and-journalists-the-ap-subpoenas.html" thr:count="4" thr:updated="2013-05-20T08:16:59-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01910224bc8e970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T21:20:09-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T21:20:09-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Lawyers and journalists -- law and journalism -- have much in common. Obligations to the truth. Reliance on experts. Right to be heard. Etc. Right now we see the media's outrage at DOJ's subpoena of the phone records (home, cell,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/ufA2WiCivB8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Stephen Gillers</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/of-lawyers-and-journalists-the-ap-subpoenas.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>When is a lawyer's demand letter really just extortion? (again)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/MRFQa5ZjjoQ/when-is-a-lawyers-demand-letter-really-just-extortion-again.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/when-is-a-lawyers-demand-letter-really-just-extortion-again.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c2bc8eb970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T13:46:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T14:47:38-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">ABA Journal carries the story about an appeal of a ruling that a lawyer's demand letter was extortion. The briefing is here and here. (We've carried lots of stories on this general topic over the years. Law is a low-grade...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/MRFQa5ZjjoQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/when-is-a-lawyers-demand-letter-really-just-extortion-again.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Has the Economy Increased Lawyer Ethics Violations?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/BXaKlSVv_M0/has-the-economy-increased-lawyer-ethics-violations.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/has-the-economy-increased-lawyer-ethics-violations.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-14T16:33:17-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb292fae970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T13:46:33-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T13:46:33-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">This ABA Journal article asks whether the current legal market has contributed to an increase in lawyer discipline.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/BXaKlSVv_M0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Brooks Holland</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/has-the-economy-increased-lawyer-ethics-violations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Religious Freedom and Freedom to Marry in Minnesota Effective August 1</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/rTL0xhqvR5k/religious-freedom-and-freedom-to-marry-in-minnesota-effective-august-1.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/religious-freedom-and-freedom-to-marry-in-minnesota-effective-august-1.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb278c5b970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T10:03:37-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T10:03:37-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Bill signing today at 5 PM at the Capitol in St. Paul: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minn-governor-sign-bill-allowing-gay-marriage-19173664 The State will no longer refuse to recognize marriages between persons of the same sex. This change has come about despite heated opposition from religious denominations that...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/rTL0xhqvR5k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Richard Painter</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/religious-freedom-and-freedom-to-marry-in-minnesota-effective-august-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Justices are a more diverse group than the lawyers who argue at the Supreme Court"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/70zOkoA_3gY/justices-are-a-more-diverse-group-than-the-lawyers-who-argue-at-the-supreme-court.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/justices-are-a-more-diverse-group-than-the-lawyers-who-argue-at-the-supreme-court.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb21441b970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T03:44:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T03:44:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">WaPo has the story. We previously looked at the demographics of the lawyers who argue before SCOTUS.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/70zOkoA_3gY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/justices-are-a-more-diverse-group-than-the-lawyers-who-argue-at-the-supreme-court.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Chevron seeks to sue Patton Boggs for fraud and deceit"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/07ImskAayI8/chevron-seeks-to-sue-patton-boggs-for-fraud-and-deceit.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/chevron-seeks-to-sue-patton-boggs-for-fraud-and-deceit.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901c24058c970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T03:11:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T03:11:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">CNN Money carries the story. The proposed complaint is here. Key graf from the story: Since late 2010, Washington, D.C. law firm Patton Boggs has been poking a sleeping tiger. It has filed three peculiar federal lawsuits -- in its...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/07ImskAayI8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/chevron-seeks-to-sue-patton-boggs-for-fraud-and-deceit.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Brady v Maryland turns 50 years old today -- but does compliance lag?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/91d2RkH9l4Q/brady-v-maryland-turns-50-years-old-today-but-does-compliance-lag.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/brady-v-maryland-turns-50-years-old-today-but-does-compliance-lag.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb1f2817970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T13:31:07-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-13T13:31:07-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Brady v Maryland was issued 50 years ago today. (h/t: Scott Greenfield) It would be difficult to gather all the posts we've had over the years at LEF about cases and stories where the Brady rights of the accused were...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/91d2RkH9l4Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/brady-v-maryland-turns-50-years-old-today-but-does-compliance-lag.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>HHS Secretary Appears to Violate Federal Ethics Rules – Again</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Ay6GWud3kWw/hhs-secretary-appears-to-violate-federal-ethics-rules-again.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/hhs-secretary-appears-to-violate-federal-ethics-rules-again.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-13T10:36:09-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb1d1925970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T08:36:47-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-13T08:36:47-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Less than a year after the Office of Special Counsel found that Secretary Sebelius violated the Hatch Act last fall, the New York Times reports that she is actively fundraising for a nonprofit group that supports the President’s political agenda....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Ay6GWud3kWw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Richard Painter</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/hhs-secretary-appears-to-violate-federal-ethics-rules-again.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Trends in Global and Canadian Lawyer Regulation" (new article by Laurel Terry)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/k_vLl7cpJgc/trends-in-global-and-canadian-lawyer-regulation-new-article-by-laurel-terry.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/trends-in-global-and-canadian-lawyer-regulation-new-article-by-laurel-terry.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102083ac0970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T03:41:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-13T03:41:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Globalization and technology have changed the practice of law in dramatic ways. This is true not only in the U.S. and Canada, but around the world. Global regulatory trends have begun to emerge as lawyer regulators have had...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/k_vLl7cpJgc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/trends-in-global-and-canadian-lawyer-regulation-new-article-by-laurel-terry.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"The Transformation of Irish Legal Services"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Hj2PQt_woL0/the-transformation-of-irish-legal-services.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/the-transformation-of-irish-legal-services.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191021246fa970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T03:08:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-13T03:08:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">A post about the difficulties lawyers face in Ireland can be found at John Flood's Random Academic Thoughts.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Hj2PQt_woL0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/the-transformation-of-irish-legal-services.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>OJ Simpson to get IAC hearing</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/nBQWdwCJsXw/oj-simpson-to-get-iac-hearing.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/oj-simpson-to-get-iac-hearing.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-05-13T11:37:03-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef017eeb0fbdde970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T03:01:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-13T03:01:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">CBS (Las Vegas) has the story. Simpson says that the attorney's error included a failure to forward a plea deal to Simpson.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/nBQWdwCJsXw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/oj-simpson-to-get-iac-hearing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Kathy Kassabian, "Clients Don't Come Cheap: The Unconstitutional Texas Client Solicitation Laws May Cost Practitioners Millions"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/eXeb0KtlnOY/kathy-kassabian-clients-dont-come-cheap-the-unconstitutional-texas-client-solicitation-laws-may-cost.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/kathy-kassabian-clients-dont-come-cheap-the-unconstitutional-texas-client-solicitation-laws-may-cost.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102018d23970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-12T03:52:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-12T03:52:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Many states have tried to impose laws that prohibit attorneys from using direct-mail to solicit employment from accident victims and arrestees. This Comment explores the harsh reality of the Texas client solicitation laws (Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/eXeb0KtlnOY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/05/kathy-kassabian-clients-dont-come-cheap-the-unconstitutional-texas-client-solicitation-laws-may-cost.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->
