<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10titles.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemtitles.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Legal Ethics Forum</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-79372</id>
    <updated>2013-06-19T12:19:16-04:00</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LegalEthicsForum" /><feedburner:info uri="legalethicsforum" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="license" type="text/html" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/" /><logo>http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif</logo><entry>
        <title>Regulatory appointee criticizes staff lawyers in speech "hypo" (aftermath of San Bruno pipeline explosion)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/qH0TcDvuSaU/regulatory-appointee-criticizes-staff-lawyers-in-speech-hypo-aftermath-of-san-bruno-pipeline-explosi.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/regulatory-appointee-criticizes-staff-lawyers-in-speech-hypo-aftermath-of-san-bruno-pipeline-explosi.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab4f0350970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-19T12:19:16-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-19T12:19:16-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">We previously covered the interesting story of the dispute between staff attorneys at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the political appointee, Frank Lindh, who oversees the lawyers. Following the catastrophic pipeline explosion and fire in San Bruno (LA...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/qH0TcDvuSaU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/regulatory-appointee-criticizes-staff-lawyers-in-speech-hypo-aftermath-of-san-bruno-pipeline-explosi.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Most Leading Law Firm Insurers See Rise in Malpractice Claims Frequency, Severity"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/BXvERtmtHxs/most-leading-law-firm-insurers-see-rise-in-malpractice-claims-frequency-severity.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/most-leading-law-firm-insurers-see-rise-in-malpractice-claims-frequency-severity.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab4a74ea970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-19T03:56:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-19T03:56:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Ames &amp;amp; Gough has another of their surveys out. Excerpt from press release: What’s driving the claims volume? “The key impetus is the recession of 2007 to 2009,” said Ms. Garczynski, although many of these claims are still working their...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/BXvERtmtHxs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/most-leading-law-firm-insurers-see-rise-in-malpractice-claims-frequency-severity.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Justice Department Fought to Conceal NSA’s Role in Terror Case From Defense Lawyers"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/6jia8vY8aXE/justice-department-fought-to-conceal-nsas-role-in-terror-case-from-defense-lawyers.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/justice-department-fought-to-conceal-nsas-role-in-terror-case-from-defense-lawyers.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d8b5e19970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-19T03:24:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-19T03:24:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Story at Wired. Excerpt: "When a senior FBI official told Congress the role the NSA’s secret surveillance apparatus played in a San Diego terror financing case today, nobody was more surprised to hear it than the defense attorney who fought...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/6jia8vY8aXE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/justice-department-fought-to-conceal-nsas-role-in-terror-case-from-defense-lawyers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>James E. Moliterno, "Ethics 20/20's Successfully Achieved its Mission: It 'Protected, Preserved, and Maintained'"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/wvV5xBFdGWs/james-e-moliterno-ethics-2020s-successfully-achieved-its-mission-it-protected-preserved-and-maintain.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/james-e-moliterno-ethics-2020s-successfully-achieved-its-mission-it-protected-preserved-and-maintain.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-06-19T12:10:40-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab15ed5e970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-19T03:07:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-19T03:07:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: The legal profession tends to look inward and backward when faced with crisis and uncertainty. Greater advances could be made by looking outward and forward to find in society and culture the causes of and connections with the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/wvV5xBFdGWs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/james-e-moliterno-ethics-2020s-successfully-achieved-its-mission-it-protected-preserved-and-maintain.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"The NYT, Zach Braff, and the Ethics of Kickstarter-ing "</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/1JHqj2Zkfmc/the-nyt-zach-braff-and-the-ethics-of-kickstarter-ing-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/the-nyt-zach-braff-and-the-ethics-of-kickstarter-ing-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab451d72970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-18T12:22:14-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-18T12:22:14-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Christine Hurt offers thoughts (and mostly criticism) at Conglomerate about the NYT "The Ethicist" column. Although I haven't read the current column, I too was consistently disappointed with The Ethicist in general.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/1JHqj2Zkfmc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/the-nyt-zach-braff-and-the-ethics-of-kickstarter-ing-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>More on Maracich v. Spears</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/oc826yXvI7g/more-on-maracich-v-spears.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/more-on-maracich-v-spears.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab40e786970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-18T03:56:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-18T03:56:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Overlawyered has more discussion of the case we mentioned yesterday dealing with a statute that protects the privacy of drivers' data but does provide an exception for litigation uses of that data. The SCOTUS held that solicitation of clients does...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/oc826yXvI7g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/more-on-maracich-v-spears.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Lydia Pallas Loren, "The Viability of the $30 (or Less) Casebook"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/z-eECkOGDhs/lydia-pallas-loren-the-viability-of-the-30-or-less-casebook.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/lydia-pallas-loren-the-viability-of-the-30-or-less-casebook.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191030bcccf970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-18T03:02:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-18T03:02:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: It is not uncommon for a new hardbound copy of today’s law school casebooks to exceed $200. And, each year, the prices inch ever higher. After exploring the various dynamics in the traditional publishing market that have led...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/z-eECkOGDhs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/lydia-pallas-loren-the-viability-of-the-30-or-less-casebook.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Nussbaum and Wolf - In Defense of the Third Year of Law School</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/cdQNkJj5rZw/nussbaum-and-wolf-in-defense-of-the-third-year-of-law-school.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/nussbaum-and-wolf-in-defense-of-the-third-year-of-law-school.html" thr:count="6" thr:updated="2013-06-18T23:58:39-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d7eaedf970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-17T15:51:25-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-17T16:27:08-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Martha Nussbaum and Charles Wolf have published an editorial on Bloomberg that defends the third year of law school. Some of the comments to the piece impugn the authors as out-of-touch and insensitive to the plight of indebted graduates. However,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/cdQNkJj5rZw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Milan Markovic</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/nussbaum-and-wolf-in-defense-of-the-third-year-of-law-school.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit: Batson challenge rejected after prosecutor claims mistake was made</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/qWYzYuMSRg4/ninth-circuit-batson-challenge-rejected-after-prosecutor-claims-mistake-was-made.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/ninth-circuit-batson-challenge-rejected-after-prosecutor-claims-mistake-was-made.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019103733f9b970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-17T12:12:02-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-17T12:12:02-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Ninth Circuit Blog brings news of Aleman v. Uribe, a case where the prosecutor struck a Hispanic potential juror and explained that the strike was based upon a mistake rather than on discriminatory motive.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/qWYzYuMSRg4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/ninth-circuit-batson-challenge-rejected-after-prosecutor-claims-mistake-was-made.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Two new SCOTUS decisions dealing with lawyers and lawyering</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/YE2xVkQQOq4/two-new-scotus-decisions-dealing-with-lawyers-and-lawyering.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/two-new-scotus-decisions-dealing-with-lawyers-and-lawyering.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d7cd727970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-17T11:09:01-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-17T21:07:57-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Maracich v. Spears: Lawyers use of DMV records for solicitation was barred by statute; the litigation exception in the statute did not encompass solicitation of clients. Opinion here. Pages 20-26 weigh the interests of attorneys doing the soliciting and interests...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/YE2xVkQQOq4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/two-new-scotus-decisions-dealing-with-lawyers-and-lawyering.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Top 350 firms grew 1.1% in last year</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/PhkePMbgbhY/top-350-firms-grew-11-in-last-year.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/top-350-firms-grew-11-in-last-year.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d768f4f970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-16T18:46:31-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-16T18:46:31-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">ABA Journal. Down from 1.7% the prior year. By the time you pass No. 200, you start reaching the firms with more partners than associates, so we're not just talking about the leveraged firms.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/PhkePMbgbhY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/top-350-firms-grew-11-in-last-year.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Affirmative action ruling contest: race vs. class" (Analysis article from AP)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/JwfNQpptTD8/affirmative-action-ruling-contest-race-vs-class-analysis-article-from-ap.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/affirmative-action-ruling-contest-race-vs-class-analysis-article-from-ap.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d73c539970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-16T11:36:42-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-17T12:03:41-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Here. (h/t: How Appealing) UPDATE: The topic is discussed at Concurring Opinions and in this NYT op-ed written by Sherrilyn Ifill titled, Race vs. Class: The False Dichotomy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/JwfNQpptTD8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/affirmative-action-ruling-contest-race-vs-class-analysis-article-from-ap.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Andrew Flavelle Martin, "Legal Ethics Versus Political Practices: The Application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to Lawyer-Politicians"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/3-uSDHKcY94/andrew-flavelle-martin-legal-ethics-versus-political-practices-the-application-of-the-rules-of-profe.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/andrew-flavelle-martin-legal-ethics-versus-political-practices-the-application-of-the-rules-of-profe.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-06-17T08:47:32-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aad41338970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-16T03:59:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-16T10:45:33-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Canadian legal ethics has paid little attention to how the rules of professional conduct for lawyers apply to lawyer-politicians – that is, politicians who happen to be lawyers. This article addresses this issue with reference to what Canadian...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/3-uSDHKcY94" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/andrew-flavelle-martin-legal-ethics-versus-political-practices-the-application-of-the-rules-of-profe.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Lorin Geitner, "Social Architecture and the Law: Law, Through the Lens of Religion"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/zQoP1pllyGM/lorin-geitner-social-architecture-and-the-law-law-through-the-lens-of-religion.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/lorin-geitner-social-architecture-and-the-law-law-through-the-lens-of-religion.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac4bb14970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-15T03:57:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-15T03:57:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: How can we account for the differing popular images of attorney in various countries? One way of doing so may be to bring a paradigm developed in religious studies to examine the most publically accessible and prototypical venue...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/zQoP1pllyGM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/lorin-geitner-social-architecture-and-the-law-law-through-the-lens-of-religion.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bryan Garner offers thoughts on lawyers and lying -- Is it ever OK?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/iywpf9vgOH0/bryan-garner-offers-thoughts-on-lawyers-and-lying-is-it-ever-ok.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/bryan-garner-offers-thoughts-on-lawyers-and-lying-is-it-ever-ok.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-06-15T08:10:10-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab21d214970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-14T17:22:11-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-16T19:27:40-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">ABA Journal carries Garner's new article on lying. Garner doesn't analyze the question using the categories that the ethics rules and the law of fraud use, but it's a nice article nonethless. Excerpt: "Is it ever justifiable for a lawyer,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/iywpf9vgOH0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/bryan-garner-offers-thoughts-on-lawyers-and-lying-is-it-ever-ok.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>If you act now!  (Law school for no tuition if you accept right away)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/YG2_3MGawyo/if-you-act-now-law-school-for-no-tuition-if-you-accept-right-away.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/if-you-act-now-law-school-for-no-tuition-if-you-accept-right-away.html" thr:count="8" thr:updated="2013-06-17T11:57:47-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01910358304f970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-14T14:11:50-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-14T14:11:50-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Above the Law posts some news that's either too hard to believe or, in this economy, all too easy to believe. In an effort to fill seats with strong students, a law school sent out this email: We are excited...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/YG2_3MGawyo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/if-you-act-now-law-school-for-no-tuition-if-you-accept-right-away.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>California task force recommends law student pro bono &amp; practical skills</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/lNSBY7QVfuY/california-task-force-recommends-law-student-pro-bono-practical-skills.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/california-task-force-recommends-law-student-pro-bono-practical-skills.html" thr:count="6" thr:updated="2013-06-19T01:26:58-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019103564747970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-14T09:44:14-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-14T10:03:12-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">As we've discussed before, the external regulation of law schools continues apace. Once you have California and New York requiring pro bono or certain types of courses, you're getting close to a national standard, given that each state contains about...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/lNSBY7QVfuY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/california-task-force-recommends-law-student-pro-bono-practical-skills.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>ReInvent Law London 2013 is Kicking Off Now - Follow It Live via Twitter!</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/RvG5r8_Hjrg/reinvent-law-london-2013.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/reinvent-law-london-2013.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab1d02f8970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-14T06:06:54-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-14T10:43:20-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">We're about to kick off ReInvent Law London 2013. The featured lineup of over 20 speakers includes QualitySolicitors Chief Executive Craig Holt, the Legal Services Board's Chief Executive Chris Kenny, and Richard Susskind on "The Past, Present, and Future of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/RvG5r8_Hjrg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Renee Newman Knake</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/reinvent-law-london-2013.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Neil Hamilton, "Law-Firm Competency Models and Student Professional Success: Building on a Foundation of Professional Formation/Professionalism"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/yHDbOcB53RA/neil-hamilton-law-firm-competency-models-and-student-professional-success-building-on-a-foundation-o.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/neil-hamilton-law-firm-competency-models-and-student-professional-success-building-on-a-foundation-o.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aad40dec970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-14T03:57:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-14T03:57:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Both law students and law schools have an opportunity created by the convergence of (1) significant employment market changes for law graduates, (2) sharp declines in law school applications, (3) increased applicant attention to each school’s employment outcomes,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/yHDbOcB53RA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/neil-hamilton-law-firm-competency-models-and-student-professional-success-building-on-a-foundation-o.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Donald J. Smythe, "Estimating Law Schools' Cumulative Passage Rates on the California Bar Exam: Some Observations and Conjectures"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/-wmv5mR8Zpc/donald-j-smythe-estimating-law-schools-cumulative-passage-rates-on-the-california-bar-exam-some-obse.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/donald-j-smythe-estimating-law-schools-cumulative-passage-rates-on-the-california-bar-exam-some-obse.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aafce6f1970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-13T23:26:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-13T23:26:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: This article uses data reported by the State Bar of California to estimate, evaluate, and compare law schools’ cumulative passage rates on the California bar exam over the periods from 2007 to 2012 and 1997 to 2012. It...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/-wmv5mR8Zpc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/donald-j-smythe-estimating-law-schools-cumulative-passage-rates-on-the-california-bar-exam-some-obse.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Philip G. Schrag, "MOOCs and Legal Education: Valuable Innovation or Looming Disaster?"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/z3sodVlbsiU/philip-g-schrag-moocs-and-legal-education-valuable-innovation-or-looming-disaster.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/philip-g-schrag-moocs-and-legal-education-valuable-innovation-or-looming-disaster.html" thr:count="7" thr:updated="2013-06-18T04:42:24-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0191034d81d2970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-13T12:04:20-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-17T18:11:51-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. (I taught a partially online PR course and was told that one faculty member had called it "the beginning of the end." But why not outsource certain parts of the course -- especially exposition of the basics -- to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/z3sodVlbsiU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/philip-g-schrag-moocs-and-legal-education-valuable-innovation-or-looming-disaster.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Magdalene D'Silva, "Comparative Professional Responsibility and Legal Ethics Education: Privilege in Global Legal Services"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/4G0POgOAIyg/magdalene-dsilva-comparative-professional-responsibility-and-legal-ethics-education-privilege-in-glo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/magdalene-dsilva-comparative-professional-responsibility-and-legal-ethics-education-privilege-in-glo.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102fc5bfe970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-13T03:56:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-13T03:56:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: This paper discusses the impact of globalisation on Australian professional responsibility and legal ethics education by a brief critical analysis of the doctrine of client/legal professional privilege in global legal services such as international arbitration. The analysis is...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/4G0POgOAIyg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/magdalene-dsilva-comparative-professional-responsibility-and-legal-ethics-education-privilege-in-glo.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Maj. Hasan: Pro se representation, shadow counsel, and unpalatable theories of imperfect necessity</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/A-R5uFgR4yQ/maj-hasan-pro-se-representation-and-unpalatable-theories-of-imperfect-necessity.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/maj-hasan-pro-se-representation-and-unpalatable-theories-of-imperfect-necessity.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-06-15T08:32:50-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192ab0e076e970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-12T16:11:16-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-15T10:18:57-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">One of the issues I continue to find interesting is the criminal defense counsel's dilemma when an accused wants to present a defense that seems nonsensical to practical lawyers. The defenses of John Brown and the Unabomber are paradigmatic. According...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/A-R5uFgR4yQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/maj-hasan-pro-se-representation-and-unpalatable-theories-of-imperfect-necessity.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Gemma E. Smyth, " Lulling Ourselves into a False Sense of Competence: Learning Outcomes and Clinical Legal Education in Canada, the United States and Australia" </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/NbSQKy2AcWw/gemma-e-smyth-lulling-ourselves-into-a-false-sense-of-competence-learning-outcomes-and-clinical-lega.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/gemma-e-smyth-lulling-ourselves-into-a-false-sense-of-competence-learning-outcomes-and-clinical-lega.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac4b69d970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-12T03:54:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-12T03:54:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Over the past several years, the regulation and accreditation of legal education in most common law jurisdictions is shifting significantly, with greater emphasis on ‘outcomes’ or ‘outputs’. In Canada, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada is entering...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/NbSQKy2AcWw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/gemma-e-smyth-lulling-ourselves-into-a-false-sense-of-competence-learning-outcomes-and-clinical-lega.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Pennsylvania Judge Reportedly Under Investigation for Wife's Receipt of Referral Fees</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/tNQCR_dnack/pennsylvania-judge-reportedly-under-investigation-for-wifes-receipt-of-referral-fees.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/pennsylvania-judge-reportedly-under-investigation-for-wifes-receipt-of-referral-fees.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-06-17T07:35:45-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d44be7d970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-11T13:49:43-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-11T13:49:43-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">This interesting story was forwarded to me by a former student. Apparently over the course of several years and while working in her husband's chambers, a lawyer made a number of referrals to prominent personal injury firms and earned significant...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/tNQCR_dnack" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Milan Markovic</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/pennsylvania-judge-reportedly-under-investigation-for-wifes-receipt-of-referral-fees.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Douglas NeJaime, "Cause Lawyers Inside the State"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/SUo2twv08n4/douglas-nejaime-cause-lawyers-inside-the-state.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/douglas-nejaime-cause-lawyers-inside-the-state.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d058475970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-11T03:15:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-11T03:15:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Scholarship on the legal profession tends to situate cause lawyers in a state of adversarial tension with government lawyers. In this conventional account, cause lawyers challenge the agenda of government attorneys, who represent institutional interests and the status...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/SUo2twv08n4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/douglas-nejaime-cause-lawyers-inside-the-state.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Judith McMorrow, "In Defense of the Business of Law"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/iNYbSTpq-X0/judith-mcmorrow-in-defense-of-the-business-of-law.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/judith-mcmorrow-in-defense-of-the-business-of-law.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac3e463970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-10T03:10:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-10T03:10:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: This article focuses on three current professionalism challenges in the U.S. legal profession: (i) the problem of neglect, poor client communication, and poor management of client funds; (ii) the need to improve the ethical infrastructures in practice settings...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/iNYbSTpq-X0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/judith-mcmorrow-in-defense-of-the-business-of-law.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>More on the Confidentiality Implications of Hunter v. Virginia State Bar</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/_Syx_5x_kss/hunter_case.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/hunter_case.html" thr:count="19" thr:updated="2013-06-18T04:59:35-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019103278338970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-09T20:20:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-13T10:26:49-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">In February, we had a useful discussion about the Virginia Supreme Court's decision in Hunter v. Virginia State Bar. In one part of Hunter (see page 18), the Court held that lawyers have a First Amendment right to reveal and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/_Syx_5x_kss" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Andrew Perlman</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/hunter_case.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Richard Zitrin, "Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/gteiJlAg0L0/richard-zitrin-guard-your-clients-public-secrets.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/richard-zitrin-guard-your-clients-public-secrets.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aaefb933970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-09T17:21:45-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-09T18:17:47-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">We previously posted about the Virginia disciplinary case against Horace Frazier Hunter, a criminal defense lawyer who blogged about his cases and used his clients' actual names without consent. When the case reached the Supreme Court of Virginia, it held...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/gteiJlAg0L0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/richard-zitrin-guard-your-clients-public-secrets.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Sherri Lee Keene, "One Small Step for Legal Writing, One Giant Leap for Legal Education: Making the Case for More Writing Opportunities in the 'Practice-Ready' Law School Curriculum"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/RqbT6snbD2w/sherri-lee-keene-one-small-step-for-legal-writing-one-giant-leap-for-legal-education-making-the-case.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/sherri-lee-keene-one-small-step-for-legal-writing-one-giant-leap-for-legal-education-making-the-case.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac3e133970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-09T03:08:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-09T03:08:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Legal writing is more than an isolated practical skill or a law school course; it is a valuable tool for broadening and deepening law students’ and new attorneys’ knowledge and understanding of the law. If experienced legal professionals,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/RqbT6snbD2w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/sherri-lee-keene-one-small-step-for-legal-writing-one-giant-leap-for-legal-education-making-the-case.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Samantha Moppett, "Lawyering Outside the Box: Confronting the Creativity Crisis"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/MjqrYw4Hd3g/samantha-moppett-lawyering-outside-the-box-confronting-the-creativity-crisis.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/samantha-moppett-lawyering-outside-the-box-confronting-the-creativity-crisis.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-06-08T10:13:40-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac3df64970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-08T03:07:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-08T03:07:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: The Great Recession was not only a defining moment in world history and for the United States economy; it was also a turning point for the legal profession. The economic downturn resulted in a long-term structural adjustment in...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/MjqrYw4Hd3g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/samantha-moppett-lawyering-outside-the-box-confronting-the-creativity-crisis.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New Ethics Opinion Discusses Duty to Disclose Fraud Against a Tribunal</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/wFAETPnOMT8/new-ethics-opinion-discusses-duty-to-disclose-fraud-against-a-tribunal.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/new-ethics-opinion-discusses-duty-to-disclose-fraud-against-a-tribunal.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d1f0a23970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T20:44:54-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T20:44:54-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">In New York, the only mandatory exception to the duty to preserve client confidences is contained in Rule 3.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 3.3(a)(3) provides that “If a lawyer, a lawyer’s client, or a witness called by...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/wFAETPnOMT8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Nicole Hyland</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/new-ethics-opinion-discusses-duty-to-disclose-fraud-against-a-tribunal.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Now That We Know About PRISM and Similar Programs, How Does that Affect Client Confidentiality?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/AW_cuXPS9xc/now-that-we-know-about-prism-and-similar-programs-how-does-that-affect-client-confidentiality.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/now-that-we-know-about-prism-and-similar-programs-how-does-that-affect-client-confidentiality.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019103143621970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T18:13:43-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-08T11:46:14-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Two days ago, the Guardian reported that Verizon was providing massive amounts of data to the U.S. Government. Some people freaked out, but others told us not to worry because it's only "metadata" - in other words, the Government isn't...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/AW_cuXPS9xc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Nicole Hyland</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/now-that-we-know-about-prism-and-similar-programs-how-does-that-affect-client-confidentiality.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Indifference to appellate court's scheduling orders leads to dismissal of appeal</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/ZyvZjKs8AD8/indifference-to-appellate-courts-scheduling-orders-leads-to-dismissal-of-appeal.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/indifference-to-appellate-courts-scheduling-orders-leads-to-dismissal-of-appeal.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aad4a218970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T03:16:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T03:16:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Justia has news of a Second Circuit decision, RLI Ins. Co. v. JDJ Marine, Inc.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/ZyvZjKs8AD8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/indifference-to-appellate-courts-scheduling-orders-leads-to-dismissal-of-appeal.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Limited Scope Representation: An Issue of Access to the Bankruptcy System"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/-ZvuFiJyPc8/limited-scope-representation-an-issue-of-access-to-the-bankruptcy-system.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/limited-scope-representation-an-issue-of-access-to-the-bankruptcy-system.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d0fc1e7970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T03:10:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T03:10:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">At Credit Slips, Lois Lupica and Nancy Rapoport discuss the possible use of limited scope representations to ameliorate the difficulties faced by pro se bankruptcy filers.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/-ZvuFiJyPc8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/limited-scope-representation-an-issue-of-access-to-the-bankruptcy-system.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bruce Green &amp; Jane Moriarity, "Rehabilitating Lawyers: Perceptions of Deviance and Its Cures in the Lawyer Reinstatement Process"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Ldj4FbFle1o/bruce-green-jane-moriarity-rehabilitating-lawyers-perceptions-of-deviance-and-its-cures-in-the-lawye.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/bruce-green-jane-moriarity-rehabilitating-lawyers-perceptions-of-deviance-and-its-cures-in-the-lawye.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-06-07T12:36:14-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d0571a2970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T03:06:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T03:06:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: State courts’ approach to lawyer admissions and discipline has not changed fundamentally in the past century. Courts still place faith in the idea that “moral character” is a stable trait that reliably predicts whether an individual will be...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Ldj4FbFle1o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/bruce-green-jane-moriarity-rehabilitating-lawyers-perceptions-of-deviance-and-its-cures-in-the-lawye.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Government lawyers and the settlement following the San Bruno gasline explosion (Who decides? The staff or the appointee?)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/Xhd72jK1Q8I/government-lawyers-and-the-settlement-following-the-san-bruno-gas-line-explostion-who-decides-the-st.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/government-lawyers-and-the-settlement-following-the-san-bruno-gas-line-explostion-who-decides-the-st.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d12baab970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-06T16:18:55-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T00:21:27-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">KQED carries a story about the legal team from the California Public Utilities Commission stepping off the case, apparently because of a disagreement with superiors about how to handle the settlement with PG&amp;amp;E following the catastrophic gasline explosion in San...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/Xhd72jK1Q8I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/government-lawyers-and-the-settlement-following-the-san-bruno-gas-line-explostion-who-decides-the-st.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Florida adopts "Code for Resolving Professionalism Complaints"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/QpwclPgAUXc/florida-adopts-code-for-resolving-professionalism-complaints.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/florida-adopts-code-for-resolving-professionalism-complaints.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d10c5a2970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-06T12:19:59-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-06T12:25:49-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Order here. This appears to create a process for handling complaints rather than yet another professionalism code. (h/t: Legal Profession Blog) Excerpt: As a first step, the Professionalism Commission has concluded and now proposes that we should not attempt to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/QpwclPgAUXc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/florida-adopts-code-for-resolving-professionalism-complaints.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Non-Profit Plaintiff Prevailing On Preliminary Injunction Which Materially Altered Relationships Entitled To Fee Recovery Unless Exceptional Circumstances Show Otherwise"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/rNvLZ_nH1c0/non-profit-plaintiff-prevailing-on-preliminary-injunction-which-materially-altered-relationships-ent.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/non-profit-plaintiff-prevailing-on-preliminary-injunction-which-materially-altered-relationships-ent.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac88f48970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-06T03:21:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-06T03:21:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">California Attorney's Fees Blog has the story about a new Ninth Circuit opinion on attorneys fees.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/rNvLZ_nH1c0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/non-profit-plaintiff-prevailing-on-preliminary-injunction-which-materially-altered-relationships-ent.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Deborah R. Gerhardt &amp; Jon P. McClanahan, "Do Trademark Lawyers Matter?"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/YmXlic8TB14/deborah-r-gerhardt-do-trademark-lawyers-matter.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/deborah-r-gerhardt-do-trademark-lawyers-matter.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aabe1f63970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-06T03:11:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-06T09:28:20-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Kate Spelman pointed me to this interesting article by UNC's Deborah Gerhardt and Jon P. McClanahan, which looks at the outcomes for trademark applicants that are lawyered-up vs. ones who aren't. A while back, we saw an article analyzing whether...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/YmXlic8TB14" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/deborah-r-gerhardt-do-trademark-lawyers-matter.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Cheaper by the Hour: Temporary Lawyers and the Deprofessionalization of the Law"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/vjf_Ei9P7YA/cheaper-by-the-hour-temporary-lawyers-and-the-deprofessionalization-of-the-law.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/cheaper-by-the-hour-temporary-lawyers-and-the-deprofessionalization-of-the-law.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-06-06T11:21:23-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d0b2f62970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-06T03:00:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-06T03:00:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Law and Politics Book Review. Book by Robert Brooks; review by Mark Kessler. (h/t: Patrick O'Donnell) Excerpt: In this fascinating ethnography combining participant observation and interviews, Robert A. Brooks makes the case that the use of temporary contract lawyers by...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/vjf_Ei9P7YA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/cheaper-by-the-hour-temporary-lawyers-and-the-deprofessionalization-of-the-law.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Law-yer or Loy-er? (part 2 of a continuing series)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/IfQwID3YKHg/law-yer-or-loy-er-part-2-of-a-continuing-series.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/law-yer-or-loy-er-part-2-of-a-continuing-series.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aac71652970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-05T17:59:47-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-05T17:59:47-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">We tackled this important topic previously. Now, Josh Blackman's blog guided me to this page showing terrific maps of regional pronunciation as tallied by Professor Bert Voux and as displayed by graduate student Joshua Katz.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/IfQwID3YKHg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/law-yer-or-loy-er-part-2-of-a-continuing-series.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Conflicts of interest in legal education</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/0RiauHKNQ-I/conflicts-of-interest-in-legal-education.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/conflicts-of-interest-in-legal-education.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102fcf618970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-05T14:10:37-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-05T14:10:37-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">John's post below raises a question I've been thinking about for awhile: how do we, as law professors, identify and handle the conflicts of interest that arise in legal education? The dispute underlying the Phoenix complaint looks in many ways...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/0RiauHKNQ-I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cassandra Burke Robertson</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/conflicts-of-interest-in-legal-education.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Make Patent Trolls Pay in Court (NYT Op-ed by Chief Judge Randall Rader (Fed. Cir.), Colleen Chien, and David Hricik)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/RXhQd-0y_XU/make-patent-trolls-pay-in-court-nyt-op-ed-by-chief-judge-randall-rader-fed-cir-colleen-chien-and-dav.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/make-patent-trolls-pay-in-court-nyt-op-ed-by-chief-judge-randall-rader-fed-cir-colleen-chien-and-dav.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901d067afb970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-05T13:18:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-05T13:18:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">The op-ed suggests that federal judges already have the tools to impose costs on patent trolls. (As you may know, there are a number of proposals around to make it harder to be a patent troll. What are the incentives...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/RXhQd-0y_XU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/make-patent-trolls-pay-in-court-nyt-op-ed-by-chief-judge-randall-rader-fed-cir-colleen-chien-and-dav.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>"Defence counsel not alter egos of clients: judge"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/jfEISaVIS7k/defence-counsel-not-alter-egos-of-clients-judge.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/defence-counsel-not-alter-egos-of-clients-judge.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-06-05T06:59:01-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901cf44a10970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-05T03:46:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-05T03:46:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">LawTimesNews (Can.): "Defence lawyers aren’t the alter egos of their clients, a Superior Court judge said in a recent ruling denouncing what he called a misunderstanding of a client-solicitor relationship. Questions around how to direct the case and what questions...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/jfEISaVIS7k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/defence-counsel-not-alter-egos-of-clients-judge.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Matt Nichol, "Transnational Legal Education: A Comparative Study of Japan and Australia"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/pIMRPibqKqg/matt-nichol-transnational-legal-education-a-comparative-study-of-japan-and-australia.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/matt-nichol-transnational-legal-education-a-comparative-study-of-japan-and-australia.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102bd6fd9970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-05T03:41:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-05T03:41:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: Legal education is transnationalizing. The legal classroom is globalizing in that a university’s classroom is not defined by walls but is now mobile through technology and international university affiliations. The legal classroom itself is globalized, composed of local...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/pIMRPibqKqg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/matt-nichol-transnational-legal-education-a-comparative-study-of-japan-and-australia.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Law school plotted to sabotage its own students?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/JeXjZ3P24gs/law-school-plotted-to-sabotage-its-own-students.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/law-school-plotted-to-sabotage-its-own-students.html" thr:count="5" thr:updated="2013-06-05T06:31:24-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef0192aaba8578970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-04T14:46:09-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-04T14:46:09-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">These allegations bother me. Two former professors at Phoneix School of Law have brought a wrongful termination suit in which they allege that the school concocted ways to prevent law students from successfully transfering to other law schools. ABA Journal....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/JeXjZ3P24gs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/law-school-plotted-to-sabotage-its-own-students.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Justice O'Connor: elected judges are politicians</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/UGDyVMfd06U/justice-oconnor-elected-judges-are-politicians.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/justice-oconnor-elected-judges-are-politicians.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-06-04T22:08:37-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef019102e166d9970c</id>
        <published>2013-06-04T03:57:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-04T10:08:33-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Chicago Tribune. Quote from Justice O'Connor's recent Lecture on History, Ethics, and Law: "“I think there are many who think of judges as politicians in robes. In many states, that’s what they are.” (h/t: Above the Law) The article notes:...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/UGDyVMfd06U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/justice-oconnor-elected-judges-are-politicians.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Dave Holness, "Recent Developments in the Provision of Pro Bono Legal Services by Attorneys in South Africa"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/HvNiMCstvK0/dave-holness-recent-developments-in-the-provision-of-pro-bono-legal-services-by-attorneys-in-south-a.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/dave-holness-recent-developments-in-the-provision-of-pro-bono-legal-services-by-attorneys-in-south-a.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901cbe9c11970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-04T03:22:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-04T03:22:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Article. Abstract: This paper focuses on legal service delivery for the indigent by attorneys in private practice acting pro bono in civil rather than criminal matters. In this regard there have been and continue to be considerable gaps between the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/HvNiMCstvK0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/dave-holness-recent-developments-in-the-provision-of-pro-bono-legal-services-by-attorneys-in-south-a.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>You could see this coming: "Congress Probing Chief Counsel’s Office in Washington in IRS Scandal"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/bspV8wuD4I0/you-could-see-this-coming-congress-probing-chief-counsels-office-in-washington-in-irs-scandal.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/you-could-see-this-coming-congress-probing-chief-counsels-office-in-washington-in-irs-scandal.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-06-04T09:22:26-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341cb84553ef01901cf34b37970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-03T19:18:38-04:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-03T20:38:51-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">You could see this coming a mile away and now the story has been broken at the National Review. (I posted about it the morning after the story broke, and then again here, about a week later. Although I mentioned...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~4/bspV8wuD4I0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Steele</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/06/you-could-see-this-coming-congress-probing-chief-counsels-office-in-washington-in-irs-scandal.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->
