<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196</id><updated>2009-11-09T01:42:00.528-05:00</updated><title type="text">Legal History Blog</title><subtitle type="html">scholarship, news and new ideas in legal history</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2778</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LegalHistoryBlog" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>LegalHistoryBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-5125019689568775080</id><published>2009-11-09T01:42:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-09T01:42:00.534-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><title type="text">Kellogg on Holmes on Judicial Restraint</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5125019689568775080/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=5125019689568775080&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/5125019689568775080" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/5125019689568775080" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/sPjHNT0Aeww/kellogg-on-holmes-on-judicial-restraint.html" title="Kellogg on Holmes on Judicial Restraint" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvdmCH-YmeI/AAAAAAAABvU/nuy6FnLV8wA/s72-c/26413r+cropped.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Frederic R. Kellogg, University of Edinburgh Law School, has posted Holmes, Common Law Theory and Judicial Restraint, which originally appeared in John Marshall Law Review 36 (2003): 457.  Here is the abstract:Judicial restraint is a subject properly bound with the interpretation, and hence the definition, of law. The nature and contours of what judges interpret dictate what is appropriate for &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=sPjHNT0Aeww:Uqvub8siv4E:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=sPjHNT0Aeww:Uqvub8siv4E:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=sPjHNT0Aeww:Uqvub8siv4E:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=sPjHNT0Aeww:Uqvub8siv4E:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/kellogg-on-holmes-on-judicial-restraint.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-4515769065719613369</id><published>2009-11-08T16:06:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-08T16:17:58.950-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Books" /><title type="text">Weekend book notes</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4515769065719613369/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=4515769065719613369&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/4515769065719613369" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/4515769065719613369" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/VnieSVFK2iY/weekend-book-notes.html" title="Weekend book notes" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Borrowing from Ralph Luker this weekend: Carlin Romano, "Perspectives on the fall of the Berlin Wall," LA Times, 8 November, reviews Stephen Kotkin's Uncivil Society: 1989 and the Implosion of the Communist Establishment, Michael Meyer's The Year That Changed the World: The Untold Story Behind the Fall of the Berlin Wall, Constantine Pleshakov's There Is No Freedom Without Bread!: 1989 and the &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=VnieSVFK2iY:WUHZuufcDZE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=VnieSVFK2iY:WUHZuufcDZE:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=VnieSVFK2iY:WUHZuufcDZE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=VnieSVFK2iY:WUHZuufcDZE:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/weekend-book-notes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-4936348783069791107</id><published>2009-11-08T02:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-08T02:15:00.050-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Courts and judges" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Books" /><title type="text">Wefing on Richard J. Hughes</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4936348783069791107/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=4936348783069791107&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/4936348783069791107" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/4936348783069791107" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/7tko_tKJjV4/wefing-on-richard-j-hughes.html" title="Wefing on Richard J. Hughes" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvQidnGHJuI/AAAAAAAABvM/q9z_ybNqjDE/s72-c/wefing_L.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Just published by the Rutgers University Press is The Life and Times of Richard J. Hughes, by John B. Wefing, Seton Hall University School of Law.  According to the Press, the bookexplores the influential public service of this two-term New Jersey governor. He was the only person in New Jersey history to serve as both governor and chief justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court.This biography &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=7tko_tKJjV4:HAwZKFshHBo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=7tko_tKJjV4:HAwZKFshHBo:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=7tko_tKJjV4:HAwZKFshHBo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=7tko_tKJjV4:HAwZKFshHBo:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/wefing-on-richard-j-hughes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-6519383310000835639</id><published>2009-11-08T00:13:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-08T00:13:00.932-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Religion" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethnicity" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Books" /><title type="text">﻿Goodfriend on Baer, Trial of Frederick Eberle</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6519383310000835639/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=6519383310000835639&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/6519383310000835639" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/6519383310000835639" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/GUfCzt56oYM/goodfriend-on-baer-trial-of-frederick.html" title="﻿Goodfriend on Baer, Trial of Frederick Eberle" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvG3PatEa2I/AAAAAAAABu8/Ws76Xq7UMTg/s72-c/baer_the+trial+.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">H-SHEAR has published Ethnicity and Language in the Early Republic, a review by Joyce Goodfriend, University of Denver, of Friederike Baer, The Trial of Frederick Eberle: Language, Patriotism and Citizenship in Philadelphia's German Community, 1790 to 1830 (New York University Press, 2008).  The review commences:This small book tackles a very large subject, nothing less than what it meant to be &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=GUfCzt56oYM:JbYQ9Yz6sJQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=GUfCzt56oYM:JbYQ9Yz6sJQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=GUfCzt56oYM:JbYQ9Yz6sJQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=GUfCzt56oYM:JbYQ9Yz6sJQ:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/goodfriend-on-baer-trial-of-frederick.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-1756261903481285210</id><published>2009-11-07T01:27:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T01:27:00.142-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lectures Workshops and Announcements" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Courts and judges" /><title type="text">Brandeis at the National Archives</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1756261903481285210/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=1756261903481285210&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1756261903481285210" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1756261903481285210" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/rUW9icXeVNY/brandeis-at-national-archives.html" title="Brandeis at the National Archives" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvIeQmGO0dI/AAAAAAAABvE/mXm1TBR7eys/s72-c/26159v.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The National Archives, in conjunction with the Freedom Forum’s First Amendment Center, will be hosting a panel, Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, the Law and the 21st Century, to be held at the Archives’s William G. McGowan Theater, 7th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., on Thursday, November 19, at 7 p.m.According to the announcement:As a Supreme Court justice (1916–&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=rUW9icXeVNY:sjXj4xMt9pY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=rUW9icXeVNY:sjXj4xMt9pY:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=rUW9icXeVNY:sjXj4xMt9pY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=rUW9icXeVNY:sjXj4xMt9pY:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/brandeis-at-national-archives.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-2249805623612676175</id><published>2009-11-07T00:32:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T00:32:00.334-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Intellectual Property" /><title type="text">Hirtle, et al., on Copyright and Cultural Institutions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2249805623612676175/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=2249805623612676175&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/2249805623612676175" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/2249805623612676175" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/WoyEErVI0m4/hirtle-et-al-on-copyright-and-cultural.html" title="Hirtle, et al., on Copyright and Cultural Institutions" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">﻿Peter B. Hirtle, Cornell University Library, Emily Hudson University of Melbourne Law School, and Andrew T. Kenyon, University of Melbourne Law School have posted Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for Digitization for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums ( Cornell University Library Press) on SSRN and here.  Here is the abstract:Digital communications technologies have led to &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=WoyEErVI0m4:DQnfvIg8SO8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=WoyEErVI0m4:DQnfvIg8SO8:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=WoyEErVI0m4:DQnfvIg8SO8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=WoyEErVI0m4:DQnfvIg8SO8:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/hirtle-et-al-on-copyright-and-cultural.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-8425677722170831461</id><published>2009-11-06T01:14:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-06T06:51:50.230-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fun" /><title type="text">The Law Are an Ass</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8425677722170831461/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=8425677722170831461&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/8425677722170831461" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/8425677722170831461" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/GgQrDFMzd00/law-are-ass.html" title="The Law Are an Ass" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/Su-TkqnM_1I/AAAAAAAABuM/hMJWuQQF0tk/s72-c/the-united-states-of-america-map.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Minor Myers, Brooklyn Law School, has posted Supreme Court Usage and the Making of an 'Is' It originally appeared in the  Green Bag, 2d ser.   11 (Summer 2008): 457.  Here's the abstract:This survey examines use of the phrases “United States is” and “United States are” in opinions of the United States Supreme Court from 1790 to 1919. The familiar claim, popularized by Shelby Foote in the Ken &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=GgQrDFMzd00:934MP3-h1Kk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=GgQrDFMzd00:934MP3-h1Kk:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=GgQrDFMzd00:934MP3-h1Kk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=GgQrDFMzd00:934MP3-h1Kk:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/law-are-ass.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-6841980920746962341</id><published>2009-11-06T01:12:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-06T01:12:00.099-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Administrative law" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><title type="text">Morag-Levine 's Long View on Agency Statutory Interpretation</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6841980920746962341/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=6841980920746962341&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/6841980920746962341" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/6841980920746962341" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/Es_w02FpwNk/morag-levine-s-long-view-on-agency.html" title="Morag-Levine 's Long View on Agency Statutory Interpretation" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvDxzMM1LLI/AAAAAAAABu0/BE2hf-ARthE/s72-c/225px-AVDicey.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Noga Morag-Levine, Michigan State University College of Law, has posted Agency Statutory Interpretation and the Rule of Common Law, which is forthcoming in Michigan State Law Review (2009).  Here is the abstract:American administrative theory and law have long treated as an axiom the notion that agencies are subordinate to the statutes that govern their mandates, and that statutory interpretation&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=Es_w02FpwNk:ptmgxqLTA88:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=Es_w02FpwNk:ptmgxqLTA88:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=Es_w02FpwNk:ptmgxqLTA88:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=Es_w02FpwNk:ptmgxqLTA88:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/morag-levine-s-long-view-on-agency.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-6921060684288170579</id><published>2009-11-06T01:05:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-06T01:05:00.486-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fellowships Grants and Awards" /><title type="text">SHFG Prizes</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6921060684288170579/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=6921060684288170579&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/6921060684288170579" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/6921060684288170579" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/dyPcA-oksKw/shfg-prizes.html" title="SHFG Prizes" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">[Here's an announcement from the Society for History in the Federal Government:]The Society for History in the Federal Government awards two prizes each year for outstanding scholarship in a published article or essay related to the history of the federal government. We are inviting submissions for the 2010 prizes, for articles or essays published during calendar year 2009. (The deadline for &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=dyPcA-oksKw:a4Bel--i5vo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=dyPcA-oksKw:a4Bel--i5vo:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=dyPcA-oksKw:a4Bel--i5vo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=dyPcA-oksKw:a4Bel--i5vo:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/shfg-prizes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-2305773112126293067</id><published>2009-11-05T10:51:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T11:11:12.080-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Conferences and Calls for Papers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Race" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Crime and Criminal Law" /><title type="text">Confronting/Imagining Legal Justice &amp; Injustice:  at Harvard tomorrow</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2305773112126293067/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=2305773112126293067&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/2305773112126293067" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/2305773112126293067" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/gvCiYMBAc7I/confrontingimagining-legal-justice.html" title="Confronting/Imagining Legal Justice &amp; Injustice:  at Harvard tomorrow" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Tomorrow at Harvard:Confronting Legal Injustice/Imagining Legal Justice Friday, November 06, 2009 9:30 AMAmes Courtroom, Austin HallHarvard Law SchoolCambridge, MA 02138This day-long conference will bring together authors from two recent books co-edited by Professors Charles Ogletree and Austin Sarat. Please join us as we discuss the various ways we confront the law’s failures as well as imagine &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=gvCiYMBAc7I:Lcvz1k76_C4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=gvCiYMBAc7I:Lcvz1k76_C4:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=gvCiYMBAc7I:Lcvz1k76_C4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=gvCiYMBAc7I:Lcvz1k76_C4:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/confrontingimagining-legal-justice.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-9015292290281456968</id><published>2009-11-05T03:37:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T07:05:50.627-05:00</updated><title type="text">November at the Miller Center</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/9015292290281456968/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=9015292290281456968&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/9015292290281456968" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/9015292290281456968" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/axjrmH866Uc/november-at-miller-center.html" title="November at the Miller Center" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The Governing American in a Global Era Colloquium of the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia has a number of interesting sessions this month.  Further about webcasts and attending in person is here.Friday, November 6Cell Blocks and Red Ink: Mass Incarceration, the Economic Crisis, and Penal ReformMarie Gottschalk, Political Science, University of PennsylvaniaFriday, &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=axjrmH866Uc:sr4qp0Zv69s:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=axjrmH866Uc:sr4qp0Zv69s:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=axjrmH866Uc:sr4qp0Zv69s:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=axjrmH866Uc:sr4qp0Zv69s:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/november-at-miller-center.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-3015141161824473252</id><published>2009-11-05T01:59:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T01:59:00.630-05:00</updated><title type="text">Johns on Julius Stone</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3015141161824473252/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=3015141161824473252&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/3015141161824473252" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/3015141161824473252" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/1_IJof95MNU/johns-on-julius-stone.html" title="Johns on Julius Stone" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvDvdnFjJLI/AAAAAAAABus/3dXoiOgNrcs/s72-c/juliusStone.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Fleur E. Johns, Sydney Law School, has posted The Gift of Realism: Julius Stone and the International Legal Academy in Australia, which is forthcoming in Julius Stone: A Study of Influence, eds. H. Irving, J. Mowbray &amp; K. Walton (Sydney: Federation Press).  Here is the abstract:This chapter contributes to a series of studies seeking to gauge what has been made of the work of international lawyer &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=1_IJof95MNU:AKJb4G7VLGE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=1_IJof95MNU:AKJb4G7VLGE:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=1_IJof95MNU:AKJb4G7VLGE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=1_IJof95MNU:AKJb4G7VLGE:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/johns-on-julius-stone.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-1259930200138707796</id><published>2009-11-04T13:09:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T13:09:00.896-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><title type="text">Historians &amp; others on Obama</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1259930200138707796/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=1259930200138707796&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1259930200138707796" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1259930200138707796" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/hUyrlUuVwqg/historians-others-on-obama.html" title="Historians &amp; others on Obama" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">From Ralph Luker:A year after his election, historians assess President Obama: Walter Isaacson, Michael Kazin, Rick Perlstein, Ted Widmer, and Garry Wills, Daily Beast, 2 November; and Doris Kearns Goodwin, Huffington Post, 3 November.And in the New York Times, reporters assess the Obama presidency.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=hUyrlUuVwqg:cjVv2WfAzJg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=hUyrlUuVwqg:cjVv2WfAzJg:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=hUyrlUuVwqg:cjVv2WfAzJg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=hUyrlUuVwqg:cjVv2WfAzJg:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/historians-others-on-obama.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-7889391840898646669</id><published>2009-11-04T10:57:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T11:07:56.763-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Courts and judges" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Labor" /><title type="text">Fudge and Tucker on Picketing Before the British Columbia Court of Appeals</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7889391840898646669/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=7889391840898646669&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/7889391840898646669" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/7889391840898646669" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/IQ-8wjdw8ko/fudge-and-tucker-on-picketing-before.html" title="Fudge and Tucker on Picketing Before the British Columbia Court of Appeals" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">'Everybody Knows What a Picket Line Means': Picketing Before the British Columbia Court of Appeal has just been posted by Judy Fudge, University of Victoria Faculty of Law and Eric Tucker, York University Osgoode Hall Law School.  It appeared in BC Studies, No. 162, pp. 53-79, Summer 2009.  Here's the abstract:      The general hostility of courts towards workers’ collective action is well &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=IQ-8wjdw8ko:bS3XThxEQq0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=IQ-8wjdw8ko:bS3XThxEQq0:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=IQ-8wjdw8ko:bS3XThxEQq0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=IQ-8wjdw8ko:bS3XThxEQq0:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/fudge-and-tucker-on-picketing-before.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-5169596729925846954</id><published>2009-11-04T06:53:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T06:53:00.533-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Administrative law" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><title type="text">Mashaw on Administrative Law in the Gilded Age</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5169596729925846954/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=5169596729925846954&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/5169596729925846954" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/5169596729925846954" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/q2R6RDYOS4E/mashaw-on-administrative-law-in-gilded.html" title="Mashaw on Administrative Law in the Gilded Age" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvDtEblVqKI/AAAAAAAABuk/u7aON_42MSg/s72-c/goodnow.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Jerry Mashaw, Yale Law School, has posted the latest installment in his history of administrative law avant la lettre, Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Gilded Age.  Here is the abstract:This article has a simple message. The standard history of the development of American Administrative Law is at best partial and in many respects incorrect. The national government of the &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=q2R6RDYOS4E:6m2MTi8Z0e8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=q2R6RDYOS4E:6m2MTi8Z0e8:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=q2R6RDYOS4E:6m2MTi8Z0e8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=q2R6RDYOS4E:6m2MTi8Z0e8:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/mashaw-on-administrative-law-in-gilded.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-7612417781788458844</id><published>2009-11-04T01:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T01:38:00.309-05:00</updated><title type="text">Jackson and Resnik's Federal Courts Stories</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7612417781788458844/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=7612417781788458844&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/7612417781788458844" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/7612417781788458844" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/SjdaGgNNkoU/jackson-and-resniks-federal-courts.html" title="Jackson and Resnik's Federal Courts Stories" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvC1SUQ1OPI/AAAAAAAABuc/YV3Bq6sUigc/s72-c/517109601_8f60f86a52.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">One doesn't generally expect to find first-rate scholarship in works intended as supplements to law school casebooks.  This is true even for the intelligently conceived "Law Stories" series, published by Foundation Press, which "tell the stories behind the leading cases in important areas of law." Its thirty or so volumes have performed the pedagogically useful function of making accessible &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=SjdaGgNNkoU:FDJ6jV3Gp8s:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=SjdaGgNNkoU:FDJ6jV3Gp8s:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=SjdaGgNNkoU:FDJ6jV3Gp8s:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=SjdaGgNNkoU:FDJ6jV3Gp8s:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/jackson-and-resniks-federal-courts.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-1361317227108990449</id><published>2009-11-04T01:01:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T01:01:00.233-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Immigration and Citizenship" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional studies" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><title type="text">Shawhan on Lyman Trumbell on Birthright Citizenship</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1361317227108990449/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=1361317227108990449&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1361317227108990449" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1361317227108990449" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/QKfXCC91juQ/shawhan-on-lyman-trumbell-on-birthright.html" title="Shawhan on Lyman Trumbell on Birthright Citizenship" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/Su87qsqughI/AAAAAAAABuE/iRYscBK1s-o/s72-c/416px-Lyman_Trumbull+2.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Mark Shawhan, Yale Law School, has posted Domicile and Birthright Citizenship, which is a student comment forthcoming in the Yale Law Journal.  Here is the abstract:This Comment argues that the contemporary debate on the meaning of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has overlooked a significant piece of historical evidence. Scholars such as Peter Schuck, Rogers Smith, and John &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=QKfXCC91juQ:FJ30FUjy1q8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=QKfXCC91juQ:FJ30FUjy1q8:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=QKfXCC91juQ:FJ30FUjy1q8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=QKfXCC91juQ:FJ30FUjy1q8:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/shawhan-on-lyman-trumbell-on-birthright.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-1938143318518493671</id><published>2009-11-04T00:44:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T07:21:11.425-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Legal profession" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Women" /><title type="text">Nackenoff and Sullivan on Women Lawyers and Progressive-Era Governance</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1938143318518493671/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=1938143318518493671&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1938143318518493671" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1938143318518493671" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/H2EzpWaK3qQ/nackenoff-and-sullivan-on-women-lawyers.html" title="Nackenoff and Sullivan on Women Lawyers and Progressive-Era Governance" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/SvBgByLVv-I/AAAAAAAABuU/SocsM3IXM3M/s72-c/Image.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Carol Nackenoff, Swarthmore College, and Kathleen Sullivan, Ohio University, have posted Women Lawyers and Governance in the Progressive Era, which they presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in September.  Here’s the abstract:Progressive Era court reform led to creation of new courts that had both formal and informal positions, some of which were filled by &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=H2EzpWaK3qQ:5kxj8tQTDsk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=H2EzpWaK3qQ:5kxj8tQTDsk:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=H2EzpWaK3qQ:5kxj8tQTDsk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=H2EzpWaK3qQ:5kxj8tQTDsk:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/nackenoff-and-sullivan-on-women-lawyers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-5575858773942975446</id><published>2009-11-03T01:12:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-03T01:12:00.225-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional studies" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Articles and essays" /><title type="text">Gudridge on Lash's Ninth Amendment in Jotwell</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5575858773942975446/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=5575858773942975446&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/5575858773942975446" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/5575858773942975446" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/VSmusLFotws/gudridge-on-lashs-ninth-amendment-in.html" title="Gudridge on Lash's Ninth Amendment in Jotwell" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Other Rights, is a summary and appreciation of Kurt Lash's recent Stanford Law Review article on the Ninth Amendment, contributed by Patrick Gudridge, University of Miami School of Law, to the new on-line journal Jotwell.  Gudgridge concludes, "It is the great virtue of Lash’s analysis that it is provocative not only in its immediate conclusions, but in the glimpse it affords of its variants – it&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=VSmusLFotws:hh_l0ngZ5pA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=VSmusLFotws:hh_l0ngZ5pA:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=VSmusLFotws:hh_l0ngZ5pA:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=VSmusLFotws:hh_l0ngZ5pA:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/gudridge-on-lashs-ninth-amendment-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-4421967375245207197</id><published>2009-11-03T00:43:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-03T00:43:00.380-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Conferences and Calls for Papers" /><title type="text">Moore on the Osgoode Society at 30</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4421967375245207197/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=4421967375245207197&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/4421967375245207197" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/4421967375245207197" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/bK49pRET95g/moore-on-osgoode-society-at-30.html" title="Moore on the Osgoode Society at 30" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/Su84X5YebmI/AAAAAAAABt8/kOgYRPkrZs0/s72-c/wosgoode.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html"> A report by Christopher Moore, "a Toronto-based writer, blogger and commentator," on Friday's conference of the  Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History is here.Image credit: William Osgoode&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=bK49pRET95g:smuaVWL0ly4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=bK49pRET95g:smuaVWL0ly4:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=bK49pRET95g:smuaVWL0ly4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=bK49pRET95g:smuaVWL0ly4:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/moore-on-osgoode-society-at-30.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-526611036231793949</id><published>2009-11-02T10:16:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-02T12:58:41.443-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lectures Workshops and Announcements" /><title type="text">The Newberry Seminar on Early Modern Legal History</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/526611036231793949/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=526611036231793949&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/526611036231793949" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/526611036231793949" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/q0oUsTklYeg/newberry-seminar-on-early-modern-legal.html" title="The Newberry Seminar on Early Modern Legal History" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_B-52RkKewCI/Su4bG1VzM6I/AAAAAAAABt0/ydy7h0Rn5iU/s72-c/cid_aj1738_b.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">This year's Symposium on Comparative Early Modern Legal History at the Newberry Library in Chicago (left), with funding by the University of Illinois College of Law, is "New Perspectives on Legal Pluralism."  Organized by Lauren Benton, New York University, and Richard Ross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, it will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Friday, April 23, 2010, at the &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=q0oUsTklYeg:JE_MwYKA8F4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=q0oUsTklYeg:JE_MwYKA8F4:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=q0oUsTklYeg:JE_MwYKA8F4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=q0oUsTklYeg:JE_MwYKA8F4:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/newberry-seminar-on-early-modern-legal.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-7275839974250290776</id><published>2009-11-02T09:02:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-02T09:02:00.166-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Blog news" /><title type="text">"You were always on my mind..."</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7275839974250290776/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=7275839974250290776&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/7275839974250290776" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/7275839974250290776" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/b7w7U3o8yqs/you-were-always-on-my-mind.html" title="&quot;You were always on my mind...&quot;" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xAgF1JPH6Ac/Su3duPSwOPI/AAAAAAAABJs/60lx4QNQ_FU/s72-c/research+%26+flowers+587.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">We are always thinking of you, dear reader, even when your faithful bloggers are spending too much time in various airports, attempting to meet too many deadlines, or are otherwise occupied.Apologies for sparse blogging over the next week. And if you're out of legal history links, perhaps you'll find some solace here.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=b7w7U3o8yqs:yPyOfA0-ujA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=b7w7U3o8yqs:yPyOfA0-ujA:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=b7w7U3o8yqs:yPyOfA0-ujA:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=b7w7U3o8yqs:yPyOfA0-ujA:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/you-were-always-on-my-mind.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-1468817157625298995</id><published>2009-11-01T13:08:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-01T13:50:47.401-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Scholarship -- Books" /><title type="text">Sunday Book Round-up</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1468817157625298995/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=1468817157625298995&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1468817157625298995" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/1468817157625298995" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/5vfDNbyRyYc/sunday-book-round-up.html" title="Sunday Book Round-up" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Ayn Rand and the World She Made by Anne C. Heller is taken up today in the New York Times and the San Francisco Chronicle. Also in the NY Times, James McPherson reviews THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR: A Military History by John Keegan.An interview with Mark Mazower, author of No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations, appears in the Boston Globe.Children of &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=5vfDNbyRyYc:me2PwCJXyN8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=5vfDNbyRyYc:me2PwCJXyN8:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=5vfDNbyRyYc:me2PwCJXyN8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=5vfDNbyRyYc:me2PwCJXyN8:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/sunday-book-round-up.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-290455526034946310</id><published>2009-10-31T08:49:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-31T08:49:00.150-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Holidays" /><title type="text">H1N1 Halloween</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/290455526034946310/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=290455526034946310&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/290455526034946310" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/290455526034946310" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/kd8GcKqWyQU/h1n1-halloween.html" title="H1N1 Halloween" /><author><name>Mary L. Dudziak</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17607431773053262679</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="14729967342883849816" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xAgF1JPH6Ac/SuvfHQW5bEI/AAAAAAAABJc/YKXOpTS0JcM/s72-c/frank%27s+halloween.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">In case you are having an H1N1 Halloween, I thought this reprisal of Frank's Halloween 2007 might be, um, well not comforting, but somehow fitting....Happy Halloween from the Legal History Blog.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=kd8GcKqWyQU:1fkLFNvQ2mw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=kd8GcKqWyQU:1fkLFNvQ2mw:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=kd8GcKqWyQU:1fkLFNvQ2mw:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=kd8GcKqWyQU:1fkLFNvQ2mw:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/h1n1-halloween.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-226690016900160196.post-2880939123862178957</id><published>2009-10-31T01:24:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-11-01T18:40:06.947-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Legal profession" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Courts and judges" /><title type="text">Henry Friendly Chooses Private Practice</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2880939123862178957/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=226690016900160196&amp;postID=2880939123862178957&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/2880939123862178957" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/226690016900160196/posts/default/2880939123862178957" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalHistoryBlog/~3/OA08NijpES8/henry-friendly-chooses-private-practice.html" title="Henry Friendly Chooses Private Practice" /><author><name>Dan Ernst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15293271193435973157</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11811801821475199876" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Like Jerold Auerbach and perhaps others, I have long quoted an off-the-cuff remark of Judge Henry Jacob Friendly (1903-1986) at the 150th anniversary of the founding of the Harvard Law School, as a window into the calculations of soon-to-be graduates at the nation’s elite law schools in the 1920s.  “Practically everyone thought there was only one career that was worth pursuing, namely private &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=OA08NijpES8:XRCVaAysFXk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=OA08NijpES8:XRCVaAysFXk:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?i=OA08NijpES8:XRCVaAysFXk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?a=OA08NijpES8:XRCVaAysFXk:dnMXMwOfBR0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LegalHistoryBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/henry-friendly-chooses-private-practice.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
